Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot.Click to learn more!

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

From Ballotpedia
(Redirected fromThird Circuit)
Third Circuit
Court of Appeals
US-CourtOfAppeals-3rdCircuit-Seal.svg
Judgeships
Posts: 14
Judges: 14
Vacancies: 0
Judges
Chief:Michael Chagares
Active judges:Stephanos Bibas,Emil Bove,Michael Chagares,Cindy Chung,Arianna Freeman,Thomas Hardiman,Cheryl Ann Krause,Jennifer Mascott,Paul Matey,Tamika Montgomery-Reeves,Peter Phipps,David Porter,Luis Felipe Restrepo,Patty Shwartz

Senior judges:
Thomas Ambro,Robert Cowen,D. Michael Fisher,Julio Fuentes,Theodore McKee,Richard Nygaard,Marjorie Rendell,Jane Roth,Anthony Scirica,David Brooks Smith,Walter Stapleton


TheUnited States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit is afederal appellate court with appellatejurisdiction. It hears appeals from all of the circuit courts within its jurisdiction and its rulings may be appealed to theSupreme Court of the United States.

Appeals are heard in the James A. Byrne Federal Courthouse inPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania. It shares a courthouse with theUnited States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

One judge of the Third Circuit went on to serve on theSupreme Court of the United States.Samuel Alito was appointed to the Supreme Court in 2006 byGeorge W. Bush (R).


This page contains the following information on the Third Circuit.

Vacancies

See also:Current federal judicial vacancies

There are no current vacancies on theThird Circuit, out of the court's 14 authorized judicial posts.

Pending nominations

There are no pending nominees for this court.


Active judges

Article III judges

JudgeAppointed ByAssumed OfficeBachelorsLaw

Michael Chagares

George W. Bush (R)

April 20, 2006 -

Gettysburg College, 1984

Seton Hall University School of Law, 1987

Thomas Hardiman

George W. Bush (R)

April 2, 2007 -

University of Notre Dame, 1987

Georgetown University Law Center, 1990

Patty Shwartz

Barack Obama (D)

April 10, 2013 -

Rutgers University, 1983

University of Pennsylvania Law School, 1986

Cheryl Ann Krause

Barack Obama (D)

July 9, 2014 -

University of Pennsylvania, 1989

Stanford Law School, 1993

Luis Felipe Restrepo

Barack Obama (D)

January 13, 2016 -

University of Pennsylvania, 1981

Tulane University Law School, 1986

Stephanos Bibas

Donald Trump (R)

November 20, 2017 -

Columbia University, 1989

Yale Law School, 1994

David Porter

Donald Trump (R)

October 15, 2018 -

Grove City College, 1988

George Mason University, Antonin Scalia Law School, 1992

Paul Matey

Donald Trump (R)

March 18, 2019 -

University of Scranton, 1993

Seton Hall University School of Law, 2001

Peter Phipps

Donald Trump (R)

July 17, 2019 -

University of Dayton, 1995

Stanford Law School, 1998

Arianna Freeman

Joe Biden (D)

October 20, 2022 -

Swarthmore College, 2001

Yale Law School, 2007

Tamika Montgomery-Reeves

Joe Biden (D)

February 7, 2023 -

University of Mississippi

University of Georgia School of Law

Cindy Chung

Joe Biden (D)

February 21, 2023 -

Yale University, 1997

Columbia Law School, 2002

Emil Bove

Donald Trump (R)

August 20, 2025 -

Jennifer Mascott

Donald Trump (R)

October 10, 2025 -


Active Article III judges by appointing political party

Below is a display of the number of active judges by the party of the appointing president. It does not reflect how a judge may rule on specific cases or their own political preferences.

  • Democratic appointed: 6
  • Republican appointed: 8

Senior judges

Senior status is a classification forfederal judges at all levels who are semi-retired. Senior judges are Article III judges who, having met eligibility through age and service requirements, continue to serve on federal courts while typically hearing a reduced number of cases. Some senior judges, however, elect to retain a full caseload after taking senior status. According to the Administrative Office of U.S. Courts, senior judges "typically handle about 15 percent of the federal courts' workload annually."[1] The date listed under assumed office in the table below reflects the date that the judge took senior status.

JudgeAppointed ByAssumed OfficeBachelorsLaw

Robert Cowen

Ronald Reagan (R)

September 4, 1998 -

Drake University, 1952

Rutgers University School of Law, 1958

Walter Stapleton

Richard Nixon (R)

June 2, 1999 -

Princeton University, 1956

Harvard Law School, 1959

Richard Nygaard

Ronald Reagan (R)

July 9, 2005 -

University of Southern California, 1969

University of Michigan Law, 1971

Jane Roth

George H.W. Bush (R)

May 31, 2006 -

Smith College, 1956

Harvard Law School, 1965

Anthony Scirica

Ronald Reagan (R)

July 1, 2013 -

Wesleyan University, 1962

University of Michigan Law School, 1965

Marjorie Rendell

Bill Clinton (D)

July 1, 2015 -

University of Pennsylvania, 1969

Villanova University School of Law, 1973

Julio Fuentes

Bill Clinton (D)

July 18, 2016 -

Southern Illinois University, 1971

State University of New York, Buffalo School of Law, 1975

D. Michael Fisher

George W. Bush (R)

February 1, 2017 -

Georgetown University, 1966

Georgetown University Law Center, 1969

David Brooks Smith

December 4, 2021 -

Franklin and Marshall College, 1973

Dickinson School of Law, 1976

Theodore McKee

October 20, 2022 -

State University of New York, Cortland, 1969

Syracuse University College of Law, 1975

Thomas Ambro

Bill Clinton (D)

February 6, 2023 -

Georgetown University, 1971

Georgetown University Law Center, 1975


Senior judges by appointing political party

Below is a display of the number of senior judges by the party of the appointing president. It does not reflect how a judge may rule on specific cases or their own political preferences.

  • Democratic appointed: 5
  • Republican appointed: 7

Former judges

For more information on former judges, seeformer federal judges of the Third Circuit.

Jurisdiction

Map of the Third Circuit. Click on a district to find out more about it.


The Third Circuit hasappellate jurisdiction over cases heard in one of its subsidiary districts. These cases can include civil and criminal matters that fall under federal law. Appeals of rulings by theThird Circuit Court of Appeals are petitioned to theSupreme Court of the United States. JusticeSamuel Alito is thecircuit justice for the Third Circuit.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has appellatejurisdiction over the United States district court in the following federal judicial districts:

It also has appellate jurisdiction over theUnited States District Court for the U.S. Virgin Islands which, in spite of the name, is aterritorial court and belongs to no federal judicial district.

Caseloads

This section contains court management statistics dating back to 2010. It was last updated in September 2025. Click[show] below for more information on caseload terms and definitions.

Caseload statistics explanation
TermExplanation
Cases filed and terminatedThe number of civil and criminal lawsuits formally initiated or decided by the court in a calendar year. The chart below reflects the table columnsCases filed andCases terminated.
Average time from filing to dispositionThe average amount of time, in months, from a case's date of filing to date of disposition (acquittal, sentencing, dismissal, etc.). The chart below reflects the table columnsMedian time (Criminal) andMedian time (Civil).
Starting case loadThe number of cases pending from the previous calendar year.
Cases filedThe number of civil and criminal lawsuits formally initiated in a calendar year.
Cases terminatedThe total number of civil and criminal lawsuits decided by the court in a calendar year.
Remaining casesThe number of civil and criminal cases pending at the end of a given year.
Median time (Criminal)The average amount of time, in months, from a case's date of filing to the date of disposition. In criminal cases, the date of disposition occurs on the day of sentencing or acquittal/dismissal.
Median time (Civil)The average amount of time, in months, from a case's date of filing to the date of disposition.
Three-year civil casesThe number and percent of civil cases that were filed more than three years before the end of the given calendar year.
Vacant postsThe number of months during the year an authorized judgeship was vacant.
Trial/PostThe number of trials completed divided by the number of authorized judgeships on the court. Trials include evidentiary trials, hearings on temporary restraining orders, and preliminary injunctions.

Source:United States Courts, "Explanation of the Judicial Caseload Profiles for United States District Courts," accessed September 25, 2018

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit caseload stats, 2010-2024
YearAppeals FiledAppeals TerminatedPending AppealsTerminations on the Merits (per Active Judge)Procedural Terminations (per Active Judge)Total Written Decisions (per Active Judge)Number of JudgeshipsNumber of Sitting Senior JudgesNumber of Vacant Judgeship MonthsMedian Time From Filing Notice of Appeal to Disposition
20103,8854,2522,894428147144149512
20113,7224,1582,434442113133141069
20123,6993,6912,419440551411410128
20133,9104,2142,099590761921412166
20143,9623,2622,80942751147141167
20153,2163,3802,645318431081410188
20163,5443,2892,898393521391411187
20172,9363,6392,196465491241493511
20182,9302,7132,414321491041410218
20193,6093,6742,350512491401491410
20202,7282,8902,1873524711314809
20212,5502,6912,0463094610014919
20222,5672,5952,0163165110514919
20232,3732,5101,8792734086141038
20242,4652,5011,8422944194141069
Average3,2063,2972,342392611251410119

History

Court history

The Third Circuit was established by the United States Congress in 1891 with theEvarts Act of 1891, which established the first nine appeals circuits. Over the years, twelve additional seats were added to the court resulting in a total of fourteen seats.[2]

Judicial posts

The following table highlights the development of judicial posts for the Third Circuit:

YearStatuteTotal Seats
March 3, 189126 Stat. 8262
February 23, 189930 Stat. 8463
June 10, 193046 Stat. 5384
June 24, 193649 Stat. 19035
December 7, 194458 Stat. 7966
August 3, 194963 Stat. 4937
May 19, 196175 Stat. 808
June 18, 196882 Stat. 1849
October 20, 197892 Stat. 162910
July 10, 198498 Stat. 33312
December 1, 1990104 Stat. 508914

[2]

Reversal rate

See also:SCOTUS case reversal rates (2007 - Present)

Since 2007, SCOTUS has released opinions in1,313 cases. Of those, it reversed a lower court decision938 times (71.4 percent) while affirming a lower court decision363 times (27.6 percent).

In that time period, SCOTUS has decided57 cases originating from the Third Circuit, affirming in 18 cases and reversing in 39 cases, for a reversal rate of68.4 percent. As of the end of the2023 term, of the Article III circuits—the ordinal circuits, the D.C. Circuit, and the Federal Circuit—the court with the lowest rate of overturned decisions is theFourth Circuit at 62.1 percent.


Noteworthy cases

The following are noteworthy cases heard before this court. To suggest cases we should cover here,email us. To read opinions published by this court, clickhere.

  • Dismissal of suit over mandatory retirement age for PA judges affirmed (2014)
     Judge(s):Thomas Ambro,Kent Jordan, andJane Roth (Lerner, at al v. Corbett, et al, 13-4184)
Click for summary→

On April 29, 2014, a three-judge panel of the Third Circuit composed of JudgesThomas Ambro,Kent Jordan, and Senior JudgeJane Roth, upheld a decision rendered by JudgeJohn E. Jones, III of theMiddle District of Pennsylvania to dismiss a suit brought by a group of Pennsylvania judges challenging the state's retirement age law.[3]


In the underlying case, the plaintiffs alleged that their forced retirement at the age of 70 was based on preconceived notions of senior citizens’ deteriorating cognitive abilities, relying heavily on the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Judge Jones found those arguments "unconvincing," further noting that the plaintiffs did not have a due process claim as they did not have a constitutionally protected property interest in continued judicial employment.[3]


In an opinion written by Judge Ambro, the plaintiff judges' claims were again rebuked, with Ambro stating that theirFourteenth Amendment rights had not been violated. Judge Ambro found that the plaintiffs' claims that opinions reached inUnited States v. Windsor andShelby County v. Holder served as intervening authority failed as a matter of law.[3]

  • Computer hacker's conviction and sentence vacated for lack of proper venue (2014)
     Judge(s):Joseph Greenaway,Thomas Vanaskie, andMichael Chagares (U.S. v. Auernheimer, 13-1816)
Click for summary→

On April 11, 2014, a three-judge panel of the Third Circuit, composed of JudgesJoseph Greenaway,Thomas Vanaskie, andMichael Chagares, vacated a hacker's conviction and prison sentence on charges relating to the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA).[4]


In the underlying case, in June 2010, Andrew “weev” Auernheimer and co-conspirator Daniel Spiller discovered a security flaw on AT&T's network server that allowed them to obtain the email addresses of 114,000 iPad users. Auernheimer emailed the details of their find to several media outlets, and shared the full list of emails generated with a writer from Gawker, a news and gossip website. While Auernheimer resided in Arkansas and the servers affected were located in Texas and Georgia, he was prosecuted in New Jersey federal court, which Auernheimer argued was an improper venue under the circumstances. TheDistrict of New Jersey rationalized this course of action by saying that the email addresses of 4,500 New Jersey residents appeared on Auernheimer's list.[4]


In 2012, a jury convicted Auernheimer of identity fraud and conspiracy to access a computer without authorization, and in March 2013, he was sentenced by JudgeSusan Wigenton to forty-one months in prison. On appeal to the Third Circuit, the three-judge panel found that Auernheimer's conviction must be vacated because of improper venue. Writing for the court in a precedential decision, Judge Chagares noted that New Jersey was "not the site of either essential conduct element" of the CFAA -- Auernheimer neither accessed nor obtained the unauthorized information in the state at any time.[4] Chagares continued, writing:


[E]ven assuming that defective venue could be amenable to harmless error review, the venue error here clearly affected Auernheimer’s substantial rights. ... The venue error in this case is not harmless because there was no evidence that any of the essential conduct elements occurred in New Jersey. If Auernheimer’s jury had been properly instructed on venue, it could not have returned a guilty verdict; the verdict rendered in this trial would have been different.[4][5]


Auernheimer was released after having spent thirteen months in prison.[4]

  • Judges agree that non-fiction book about known affair isn't defamatory (2014)
     Judge(s):Thomas Ambro,Michael Fisher, andThomas Hardiman (Crecenz v. Penguin Group, Inc.; Capuzzo, 13-1242)
Click for summary→

On March 26, 2014, a three-judge panel of the Third Circuit, composed of JudgesThomas Ambro,Michael Fisher, andThomas Hardiman, ruled that a non-fiction book was not defamatory even though it addressed a married woman's affair with her boss.[6]


In the underlying case, Penguin Group published a book written by Michael Capuzzo called "The Murder Room: The Heirs of Sherlock Holmes Gather to Solve the World's Most Perplexing Cold Cases," in August 2010. The book recounted the work of the Vidocq Society, a Philadelphia-based forensic group, and its founding member, Frank Bender. Bender's assistant, Joan Crecenz, filed a lawsuit in 2011, alleging that she was defamed and suffered false light invasion of privacy as a result of Capuzzo's "reckless casting" of her as one of her boss's "girlfriends." During the course of the litigation, however, additional facts were disclosed concerning Crecenz's sexual relationship with Bender, and JudgeNoel Hillman of theDistrict of New Jersey awardedsummary judgment to Penguin Group and Capuzzo.[6]


Crecenz appealed to the Third Circuit, which affirmed the ruling. Judge Hardiman, on behalf of the majority, wrote:[6]


[W]e agree with the District Court thatsummary judgmentis appropriate because Capuzzo possessed overwhelming evidence of a sexual relationship between Bender and Crescenz, and because Crescenz has failed to refute that evidence. Even if a jury could credit Crescenz’s testimony and find the allegations of a sexual relationship false, no reasonable jury could find that Capuzzo was negligent in ascertaining the truth of his statements. Accordingly, the District Court did not err in grantingsummary judgment to Capuzzo on Crescenz’s defamation claim.[5]
  • FBI's racial profiling records kept under wraps (2013)
     Judge(s):D. Brooks Smith,Dolores Sloviter, andJane Roth (ACLU of New Jersey v. FBI, DOJ, 12-4345)
Click for summary→

On October 23, 2013, in a precedential opinion, a three-judge panel of theThird Circuit, composed of JudgeD. Brooks Smith and Senior JudgesDolores Sloviter andJane Roth, found that documents requested by theAmerican Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey (ACLU) from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) under a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request were properly withheld. In the underlying case, the ACLU filed a FOIA request seeking access to records concerning the "FBI's use of ethnic and racial data" in its "limited racial and ethnic profiling" as authorized by the 9/11 Commission's final report. The FBI identified 782 pages of documents related to the ACLU's request, but released only 312 pages, citing 186 pages as duplicative and 284 pages as exempt from disclosure. The ACLUfiled suit in May 2011, seeking access toall of the documents identified by the FBI. Citing several exemptions to FOIA rules, the FBI filed a motion forsummary judgment. This prompted the ACLU to file a cross-motion forsummary judgment, requesting that presiding JudgeEsther Salas of theDistrict of New Jersey review the documents privately. The ACLU further requested that Salas use a"Glomar-like" procedure in chambers. Judge Salas refused, and granted the FBI's motion forsummary judgment. The ACLU filed an appeal. Writing for three-judge panel of the Third Circuit, Judge Smith rejected the ACLU's "novel [Glomarization] proposal," and stated that "ample evidence" was available in support of Judge Salas' decision. Smith further noted that it would be "hard to imagine how the FBI could provide a more detailed justification for withholding information under this exemption without compromising the very information it sought to protect."[7][8]


Before the U.S. Supreme Court

This section focuses on cases the U.S. Supreme Court heard that originated in this court. To suggest cases we should cover here,email us.

2025-2026 term

See also:Supreme Court cases, October term 2025-2026

The following cases were scheduled for argument before the U.S. Supreme Court during the 2025-2026 term.

2025-2026 U.S. Supreme Court cases from the 3rd Circuit
CaseOpinion authorDecisionVote
Berk v. ChoyAmy Coney Barrettreversed andremanded9-0
Rutherford v. United StatesTBDTBDTBD
First Choice Women’s Resource Centers, Inc. v. PlatkinTBDTBDTBD

2024-2025 term

See also:Supreme Court cases, October term 2024-2025

The following cases were heard for argument before the U.S. Supreme Court during the 2024-2025 term.

2024-2025 U.S. Supreme Court cases from the 3rd Circuit
CaseOpinion authorDecisionVote
Kousisis v. United StatesAmy Coney Barrettaffirmed9-0
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. ZuchAmy Coney Barrettreversed andremanded8-1

2023-2024 term

See also:Supreme Court cases, October term 2023-2024

The following cases were heard for argument before the U.S. Supreme Court during the 2023-2024 term.

2023-2024 U.S. Supreme Court cases from the 3rd Circuit
CaseOpinion authorDecisionVote
Brown v. United States (Consolidated withJackson v. United States)Samuel Alitoaffirmed6-3
Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Co., LLCBrett Kavanaughreversed9-0
Wilkinson v. GarlandSonia Sotomayorreversed in part,vacated in part, andremanded6-3
Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. KirtzNeil Gorsuchaffirmed9-0

2022-2023 term

See also:Supreme Court cases, October term 2022-2023

The following cases were heard for argument before the U.S. Supreme Court during the 2022-2023 term.

2022-2023 U.S. Supreme Court cases from the 3rd Circuit
CaseOpinion authorDecisionVote
United States, ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc.Elena Kaganaffirmed8-1
Groff v. DeJoySamuel Alitovacated andremanded9-0

2021-2022 term

See also:Supreme Court cases, October term 2021-2022

The following cases were heard before the U.S. Supreme Court during the 2021-2022 term.

2021-2022 U.S. Supreme Court cases from the 3rd Circuit
CaseOpinion authorDecisionVote
Johnson v. Arteaga-MartinezSonia Sotomayorreversed andremanded8-1

2020-2021 term

See also:Supreme Court cases, October term 2020-2021

The following cases were heard before the U.S. Supreme Court during the 2020-2021 term.

2020-2021 U.S. Supreme Court cases from the 3rd Circuit
CaseOpinion authorDecisionVote
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaChief Justice John Robertsreversed andremanded9-0
Carney v. AdamsStephen Breyervacated andremanded8-0
FCC v. Prometheus Radio Project
(Consolidated withNational Association of Broadcasters v. Prometheus Radio Project)
Brett Kavanaughreversed9-0
Sanchez v. MayorkasElena Kaganaffirmed9-0
Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L.Stephen Breyeraffirmed8-1
PennEast Pipeline Co. v. New JerseyJohn Robertsreversed andremanded5-4


2019-2020 term

See also:Supreme Court cases, October term 2019-2020

The following cases were heard before the U.S. Supreme Court during the 2019-2020 term.

2019-2020 U.S. Supreme Court cases from the 3rd Circuit
CaseOpinion authorDecisionVote
Rotkiske v. KlemmClarence Thomasaffirmed8-1
CITGO Asphalt Refining Co. v. Frescati Shipping Co., Ltd.Sonia Sotomayoraffirmed7-2
Kelly v. United StatesElena Kaganreversed andremanded9-0
Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania (Consolidated withTrump v. Pennsylvania)Clarence Thomasreversed andremanded7-2

Former judges

Former chief judges

In order to qualify for the office ofchief judge in an Article III circuit or district court, or on theUnited States Court of International Trade, a judge must be in active service and hold seniority over the court's commissioned judges who are 64 years of age or under, have served one year or more, and have not previously served as chief judge.[9]

In the event that no judge on the court meets those qualifications, the youngest judge in regular active service aged 65 years or more and who has served as a judge for one year or more shall become chief judge. If no judge meets those qualifications, the judge holding seniority in active service who has not served as chief before shall become the chief judge.[10][11][12]

The chief judge serves for a term of seven years until another judge becomes eligible to serve in the position. No judge is permitted to serve as chief judge after reaching the age of 70 years unless no other judge is qualified to serve.[10][11][12]

Unlike the chief justice of the United States, a chief judge returns to active service after the expiration of their term and does not create a vacancy on the court by the fact of their promotion.[9][10][11][12]

On theUnited States Court of Federal Claims, the chief judge is selected by thepresident of the United States. The judge must be less than 70 years of age. A chief may serve until they reach age 70 or until another judge is designated by the president as the new chief judge. If the president selects a new chief judge, the former chief judge may continue active service on the court for the remainder of their appointed term.[13]



Federal courthouse

The Third Circuit shares the James A. Byrne Federal Courthouse with theEastern District of Pennsylvania located in Center CityPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania. The courthouse was designed by LZA Technology and opened in 1975 as part of the Bicentennial of the Declaration of Independence celebration.[14][15]

About United States Courts of Appeals

TheUnited States courts of appeals (orcircuit courts) are the intermediateappellate courts of theUnited States federal courts. The court of appeals was originally created in 1891 and has grown to include thirteen courts.

A court of appeals decides appeals from any of thedistrict courts that are in its federal judicial circuit. The appeals courts also can hear appeals from some administrative agencies. Decisions of the federal appeals courts can, in turn, be appealed to theSupreme Court of the United States.

There are thirteen United States courts of appeals. In addition, there are other federal courts (such as theCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces, which hears appeals in court-martial cases) that have "Court of Appeals" in their titles.

The eleven numbered circuits and theD.C. Circuit are defined by geography. The thirteenth court of appeal is theCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. This court has nationwide jurisdiction over certain types of appeals based on what the underlying legal case is about.

All of the courts of appeals also hear appeals from some administrative agency decisions and rulemaking. The largest share of this type of case is heard by the D.C. Circuit. The Federal Circuit hears appeals from specialized trial courts, primarily theCourt of International Trade and theCourt of Federal Claims, as well as appeals from the district courts inpatent cases and certain other specialized matters.

Federal circuit court judges are appointed for life. They are paid approximately $179,500 annually. At the age of 65, a federal judge may choose to retire with his or her full salary. Judges may also choose to go onsenior status at age 65, if they have served actively for 15 years.[16]

Appointments by president

The chart below shows the number of appeals court judges confirmed by the U.S. Senate through February 1 of the second year of each president's second term in office. At this point in the term, President Obama had the most appeals court appointments with 12.


Judges by circuit

See also:Judicial vacancies in federal courts

The table below displays the number of judges in each circuit and indicates how many were appointed by presidents from each major political party. It also includes the number of vacancies on a circuit and how many pending nominations for that circuit are before theUnited States Senate. The table can be sorted by clicking the column headers above the line. It is updated every Monday.



See also


External links


Footnotes

  1. United States Courts, "FAQs: Federal Judges: What is a senior judge?" accessed December 19, 2016
  2. 2.02.1Federal Judicial Center, "U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit: Legislative History," accessed May 5, 2021
  3. 3.03.13.2PennLive.com, "U.S. Appeals Court backs Pa. judge retirement mandate," April 29, 2014
  4. 4.04.14.24.34.4RT, "AT&T hacker ‘weev’ to walk free after appeals court agrees to vacate conviction," April 11, 2014
  5. 5.05.1Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  6. 6.06.16.2Courthouse News Service, "Exposing Not-So Secret Affair Isn't Defamatory," April 22, 2014 (archived)
  7. Courthouse News Service, "ACLU Sues FBI for Racial Profiling Info," May 6, 2011
  8. Courthouse News Service, "Court Keeps a Lid on FBI's Racial Profiling Records," October 25, 2013 (archived)
  9. 9.09.1United States Courts, "Frequently Asked Questions," accessed January 25, 2022
  10. 10.010.110.2Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute, "28 U.S. Code § 136 - Chief judges; precedence of district judges," accessed January 25, 2022
  11. 11.011.111.2Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute, "28 U.S. Code § 258 - Chief judges; precedence of judges," accessed January 25, 2022
  12. 12.012.112.2Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute, "28 U.S. Code § 45 - Chief judges; precedence of judges," accessed January 25, 2022
  13. Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute, "28 U.S. Code § 171 - Appointment and number of judges; character of court; designation of chief judge," accessed January 25, 2022
  14. Third Branch News, "Appellate Court Saves Money by Making Chambers Space Go Farther," December 4, 2013
  15. Courthouse News Service, "3rd Circuit Saves Money by Sharing Offices," December 10, 2013 (archive)
  16. United States Courts, "FAQs: Federal Judges," accessed May 5, 2021


US-CourtOfAppeals-3rdCircuit-Seal.svg
v  e
Federal judges who have served theU.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Active judges

Chief JudgeMichael Chagares  •  Patty Shwartz  •  Felipe Restrepo  •  Thomas Hardiman  •  Cheryl Ann Krause  •  Tamika Montgomery-Reeves  •  Stephanos Bibas  •  Peter Phipps  •  Paul Matey  •  David Porter (Third Circuit)  •  Arianna Freeman  •  Cindy Chung  •  Emil Bove  •  Jennifer Mascott

Senior judges

Thomas Vanaskie  •  Anthony Scirica  •  Walter Stapleton (federal judge)  •  Robert Cowen  •  Jane Roth  •  Richard Nygaard  •  Theodore McKee  •  Marjorie Rendell  •  Thomas Ambro  •  Julio Fuentes  •  Brooks Smith  •  D. Michael Fisher  •  

Former judgesSamuel Alito  •  Joseph Greenaway  •  Thomas Vanaskie  •  Marcus Wilson Acheson  •  Joseph Weis (Third Circuit)  •  Morton Greenberg  •  Ruggero Aldisert  •  Dolores Sloviter  •  Theodore McKee  •  Maryanne Trump Barry  •  Kent Jordan  •  Joseph Buffington  •  George Mifflin Dallas  •  Timothy Lewis (Pennsylvania)  •  Lee Sarokin  •  James Hunter  •  James Rosen  •  Michael Chertoff  •  Robert Wodrow Archbald  •  George Gray (Third Circuit)  •  John Bayard McPherson  •  William Mershon Lanning  •  Joseph Whitaker Thompson  •  John Warren Davis (Third Circuit)  •  Thomas Griffith Haight  •  Victor Baynard Woolley  •  William Clark (New Jersey)  •  Harry Kalodner  •  Phillip Forman  •  Albert Maris  •  John Biggs  •  Francis Biddle  •  William Francis Smith  •  Edward Becker  •  Abraham Freedman  •  James Ganey  •  Francis Van Dusen  •  Aloyisus Higginbotham  •  Carol Mansmann  •  Herbert Goodrich  •  Arlin Adams  •  John Gibbons (Third Circuit)  •  William Hastie  •  William Hutchinson  •  Charles Alvin Jones  •  Gerald McLaughlin  •  John O'Connell  •  Max Rosenn  •  Collins Seitz  •  David Stahl (Third Circuit)  •  Austin Staley  •  
Former Chief judges

Anthony Scirica  •  Ruggero Aldisert  •  Dolores Sloviter  •  Theodore McKee  •  Brooks Smith  •  Harry Kalodner  •  John Biggs  •  Edward Becker  •  Aloyisus Higginbotham  •  John Gibbons (Third Circuit)  •  William Hastie  •  Collins Seitz  •  Austin Staley  •  


v  e
U.S. Circuit Courts andDistrict Courts
First Circuit
Second Circuit
Third Circuit
Fourth Circuit
Fifth Circuit
Sixth Circuit
Seventh Circuit
Eighth Circuit
Ninth Circuit
Tenth Circuit
Eleventh Circuit