United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
| Third Circuit |
|---|
| Court of Appeals |
| Judgeships |
| Posts: 14 |
| Judges: 14 |
| Vacancies: 0 |
| Judges |
| Chief:Michael Chagares |
| Active judges:Stephanos Bibas,Emil Bove,Michael Chagares,Cindy Chung,Arianna Freeman,Thomas Hardiman,Cheryl Ann Krause,Jennifer Mascott,Paul Matey,Tamika Montgomery-Reeves,Peter Phipps,David Porter,Luis Felipe Restrepo,Patty Shwartz Senior judges: |
TheUnited States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit is afederal appellate court with appellatejurisdiction. It hears appeals from all of the circuit courts within its jurisdiction and its rulings may be appealed to theSupreme Court of the United States.
Appeals are heard in the James A. Byrne Federal Courthouse inPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania. It shares a courthouse with theUnited States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
One judge of the Third Circuit went on to serve on theSupreme Court of the United States.Samuel Alito was appointed to the Supreme Court in 2006 byGeorge W. Bush (R).
This page contains the following information on the Third Circuit.
- An overview of the court'sjurisdiction
- A list of the court'sactive and senior judges
- A list of the court'scurrent vacancies
- Abrief history of the court
- Case reversal statistics by the Supreme Court of the United States
- Noteworthy cases heard by the court
- A list of the court'sformer judges
- Information aboutU.S. Courts of Appeals
- Where the court islocated
Vacancies
- See also:Current federal judicial vacancies
There are no current vacancies on theThird Circuit, out of the court's 14 authorized judicial posts.
Pending nominations
There are no pending nominees for this court.
Active judges
Article III judges
| Judge | Appointed By | Assumed Office | Bachelors | Law |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| April 20, 2006 - | Gettysburg College, 1984 | Seton Hall University School of Law, 1987 | ||
| April 2, 2007 - | University of Notre Dame, 1987 | Georgetown University Law Center, 1990 | ||
| April 10, 2013 - | Rutgers University, 1983 | University of Pennsylvania Law School, 1986 | ||
| July 9, 2014 - | University of Pennsylvania, 1989 | Stanford Law School, 1993 | ||
| January 13, 2016 - | University of Pennsylvania, 1981 | Tulane University Law School, 1986 | ||
| November 20, 2017 - | Columbia University, 1989 | Yale Law School, 1994 | ||
| October 15, 2018 - | Grove City College, 1988 | George Mason University, Antonin Scalia Law School, 1992 | ||
| March 18, 2019 - | University of Scranton, 1993 | Seton Hall University School of Law, 2001 | ||
| July 17, 2019 - | University of Dayton, 1995 | Stanford Law School, 1998 | ||
| October 20, 2022 - | Swarthmore College, 2001 | Yale Law School, 2007 | ||
| February 7, 2023 - | University of Mississippi | University of Georgia School of Law | ||
| February 21, 2023 - | Yale University, 1997 | Columbia Law School, 2002 | ||
| August 20, 2025 - | ||||
| October 10, 2025 - |
Active Article III judges by appointing political party
Below is a display of the number of active judges by the party of the appointing president. It does not reflect how a judge may rule on specific cases or their own political preferences.
- Democratic appointed: 6
- Republican appointed: 8
Senior judges
Senior status is a classification forfederal judges at all levels who are semi-retired. Senior judges are Article III judges who, having met eligibility through age and service requirements, continue to serve on federal courts while typically hearing a reduced number of cases. Some senior judges, however, elect to retain a full caseload after taking senior status. According to the Administrative Office of U.S. Courts, senior judges "typically handle about 15 percent of the federal courts' workload annually."[1] The date listed under assumed office in the table below reflects the date that the judge took senior status.
| Judge | Appointed By | Assumed Office | Bachelors | Law |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 4, 1998 - | Drake University, 1952 | Rutgers University School of Law, 1958 | ||
| June 2, 1999 - | Princeton University, 1956 | Harvard Law School, 1959 | ||
| July 9, 2005 - | University of Southern California, 1969 | University of Michigan Law, 1971 | ||
| May 31, 2006 - | Smith College, 1956 | Harvard Law School, 1965 | ||
| July 1, 2013 - | Wesleyan University, 1962 | University of Michigan Law School, 1965 | ||
| July 1, 2015 - | University of Pennsylvania, 1969 | Villanova University School of Law, 1973 | ||
| July 18, 2016 - | Southern Illinois University, 1971 | State University of New York, Buffalo School of Law, 1975 | ||
| February 1, 2017 - | Georgetown University, 1966 | Georgetown University Law Center, 1969 | ||
| December 4, 2021 - | Franklin and Marshall College, 1973 | Dickinson School of Law, 1976 | ||
| October 20, 2022 - | State University of New York, Cortland, 1969 | Syracuse University College of Law, 1975 | ||
| February 6, 2023 - | Georgetown University, 1971 | Georgetown University Law Center, 1975 |
Senior judges by appointing political party
Below is a display of the number of senior judges by the party of the appointing president. It does not reflect how a judge may rule on specific cases or their own political preferences.
- Democratic appointed: 5
- Republican appointed: 7
Former judges
For more information on former judges, seeformer federal judges of the Third Circuit.
Jurisdiction
The Third Circuit hasappellate jurisdiction over cases heard in one of its subsidiary districts. These cases can include civil and criminal matters that fall under federal law. Appeals of rulings by theThird Circuit Court of Appeals are petitioned to theSupreme Court of the United States. JusticeSamuel Alito is thecircuit justice for the Third Circuit.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has appellatejurisdiction over the United States district court in the following federal judicial districts:
- District of Delaware
- District of New Jersey
- Eastern District of Pennsylvania
- Middle District of Pennsylvania
- Western District of Pennsylvania
It also has appellate jurisdiction over theUnited States District Court for the U.S. Virgin Islands which, in spite of the name, is aterritorial court and belongs to no federal judicial district.
Caseloads
This section contains court management statistics dating back to 2010. It was last updated in September 2025. Click[show] below for more information on caseload terms and definitions.
| Caseload statistics explanation | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Term | Explanation | ||||||||
| Cases filed and terminated | The number of civil and criminal lawsuits formally initiated or decided by the court in a calendar year. The chart below reflects the table columnsCases filed andCases terminated. | ||||||||
| Average time from filing to disposition | The average amount of time, in months, from a case's date of filing to date of disposition (acquittal, sentencing, dismissal, etc.). The chart below reflects the table columnsMedian time (Criminal) andMedian time (Civil). | ||||||||
| Starting case load | The number of cases pending from the previous calendar year. | ||||||||
| Cases filed | The number of civil and criminal lawsuits formally initiated in a calendar year. | ||||||||
| Cases terminated | The total number of civil and criminal lawsuits decided by the court in a calendar year. | ||||||||
| Remaining cases | The number of civil and criminal cases pending at the end of a given year. | ||||||||
| Median time (Criminal) | The average amount of time, in months, from a case's date of filing to the date of disposition. In criminal cases, the date of disposition occurs on the day of sentencing or acquittal/dismissal. | ||||||||
| Median time (Civil) | The average amount of time, in months, from a case's date of filing to the date of disposition. | ||||||||
| Three-year civil cases | The number and percent of civil cases that were filed more than three years before the end of the given calendar year. | ||||||||
| Vacant posts | The number of months during the year an authorized judgeship was vacant. | ||||||||
| Trial/Post | The number of trials completed divided by the number of authorized judgeships on the court. Trials include evidentiary trials, hearings on temporary restraining orders, and preliminary injunctions. | ||||||||
| United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit caseload stats, 2010-2024 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | Appeals Filed | Appeals Terminated | Pending Appeals | Terminations on the Merits (per Active Judge) | Procedural Terminations (per Active Judge) | Total Written Decisions (per Active Judge) | Number of Judgeships | Number of Sitting Senior Judges | Number of Vacant Judgeship Months | Median Time From Filing Notice of Appeal to Disposition | |
| 2010 | 3,885 | 4,252 | 2,894 | 428 | 147 | 144 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 12 | |
| 2011 | 3,722 | 4,158 | 2,434 | 442 | 113 | 133 | 14 | 10 | 6 | 9 | |
| 2012 | 3,699 | 3,691 | 2,419 | 440 | 55 | 141 | 14 | 10 | 12 | 8 | |
| 2013 | 3,910 | 4,214 | 2,099 | 590 | 76 | 192 | 14 | 12 | 16 | 6 | |
| 2014 | 3,962 | 3,262 | 2,809 | 427 | 51 | 147 | 14 | 11 | 6 | 7 | |
| 2015 | 3,216 | 3,380 | 2,645 | 318 | 43 | 108 | 14 | 10 | 18 | 8 | |
| 2016 | 3,544 | 3,289 | 2,898 | 393 | 52 | 139 | 14 | 11 | 18 | 7 | |
| 2017 | 2,936 | 3,639 | 2,196 | 465 | 49 | 124 | 14 | 9 | 35 | 11 | |
| 2018 | 2,930 | 2,713 | 2,414 | 321 | 49 | 104 | 14 | 10 | 21 | 8 | |
| 2019 | 3,609 | 3,674 | 2,350 | 512 | 49 | 140 | 14 | 9 | 14 | 10 | |
| 2020 | 2,728 | 2,890 | 2,187 | 352 | 47 | 113 | 14 | 8 | 0 | 9 | |
| 2021 | 2,550 | 2,691 | 2,046 | 309 | 46 | 100 | 14 | 9 | 1 | 9 | |
| 2022 | 2,567 | 2,595 | 2,016 | 316 | 51 | 105 | 14 | 9 | 1 | 9 | |
| 2023 | 2,373 | 2,510 | 1,879 | 273 | 40 | 86 | 14 | 10 | 3 | 8 | |
| 2024 | 2,465 | 2,501 | 1,842 | 294 | 41 | 94 | 14 | 10 | 6 | 9 | |
| Average | 3,206 | 3,297 | 2,342 | 392 | 61 | 125 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 9 | |
History
Court history
The Third Circuit was established by the United States Congress in 1891 with theEvarts Act of 1891, which established the first nine appeals circuits. Over the years, twelve additional seats were added to the court resulting in a total of fourteen seats.[2]
Judicial posts
The following table highlights the development of judicial posts for the Third Circuit:
| Year | Statute | Total Seats |
| March 3, 1891 | 26 Stat. 826 | 2 |
| February 23, 1899 | 30 Stat. 846 | 3 |
| June 10, 1930 | 46 Stat. 538 | 4 |
| June 24, 1936 | 49 Stat. 1903 | 5 |
| December 7, 1944 | 58 Stat. 796 | 6 |
| August 3, 1949 | 63 Stat. 493 | 7 |
| May 19, 1961 | 75 Stat. 80 | 8 |
| June 18, 1968 | 82 Stat. 184 | 9 |
| October 20, 1978 | 92 Stat. 1629 | 10 |
| July 10, 1984 | 98 Stat. 333 | 12 |
| December 1, 1990 | 104 Stat. 5089 | 14 |
Reversal rate
Since 2007, SCOTUS has released opinions in1,313 cases. Of those, it reversed a lower court decision938 times (71.4 percent) while affirming a lower court decision363 times (27.6 percent).
In that time period, SCOTUS has decided57 cases originating from the Third Circuit, affirming in 18 cases and reversing in 39 cases, for a reversal rate of68.4 percent. As of the end of the2023 term, of the Article III circuits—the ordinal circuits, the D.C. Circuit, and the Federal Circuit—the court with the lowest rate of overturned decisions is theFourth Circuit at 62.1 percent.
Noteworthy cases
The following are noteworthy cases heard before this court. To suggest cases we should cover here,email us. To read opinions published by this court, clickhere.
| • Dismissal of suit over mandatory retirement age for PA judges affirmed (2014) Judge(s):Thomas Ambro,Kent Jordan, andJane Roth (Lerner, at al v. Corbett, et al, 13-4184) | Click for summary→ |
|---|---|
On April 29, 2014, a three-judge panel of the Third Circuit composed of JudgesThomas Ambro,Kent Jordan, and Senior JudgeJane Roth, upheld a decision rendered by JudgeJohn E. Jones, III of theMiddle District of Pennsylvania to dismiss a suit brought by a group of Pennsylvania judges challenging the state's retirement age law.[3]
| |
| • Computer hacker's conviction and sentence vacated for lack of proper venue (2014) Judge(s):Joseph Greenaway,Thomas Vanaskie, andMichael Chagares (U.S. v. Auernheimer, 13-1816) | Click for summary→ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
On April 11, 2014, a three-judge panel of the Third Circuit, composed of JudgesJoseph Greenaway,Thomas Vanaskie, andMichael Chagares, vacated a hacker's conviction and prison sentence on charges relating to the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA).[4]
| ||||
| • Judges agree that non-fiction book about known affair isn't defamatory (2014) Judge(s):Thomas Ambro,Michael Fisher, andThomas Hardiman (Crecenz v. Penguin Group, Inc.; Capuzzo, 13-1242) | Click for summary→ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
On March 26, 2014, a three-judge panel of the Third Circuit, composed of JudgesThomas Ambro,Michael Fisher, andThomas Hardiman, ruled that a non-fiction book was not defamatory even though it addressed a married woman's affair with her boss.[6]
| ||||
| • FBI's racial profiling records kept under wraps (2013) Judge(s):D. Brooks Smith,Dolores Sloviter, andJane Roth (ACLU of New Jersey v. FBI, DOJ, 12-4345) | Click for summary→ |
|---|---|
On October 23, 2013, in a precedential opinion, a three-judge panel of theThird Circuit, composed of JudgeD. Brooks Smith and Senior JudgesDolores Sloviter andJane Roth, found that documents requested by theAmerican Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey (ACLU) from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) under a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request were properly withheld. In the underlying case, the ACLU filed a FOIA request seeking access to records concerning the "FBI's use of ethnic and racial data" in its "limited racial and ethnic profiling" as authorized by the 9/11 Commission's final report. The FBI identified 782 pages of documents related to the ACLU's request, but released only 312 pages, citing 186 pages as duplicative and 284 pages as exempt from disclosure. The ACLUfiled suit in May 2011, seeking access toall of the documents identified by the FBI. Citing several exemptions to FOIA rules, the FBI filed a motion forsummary judgment. This prompted the ACLU to file a cross-motion forsummary judgment, requesting that presiding JudgeEsther Salas of theDistrict of New Jersey review the documents privately. The ACLU further requested that Salas use a"Glomar-like" procedure in chambers. Judge Salas refused, and granted the FBI's motion forsummary judgment. The ACLU filed an appeal. Writing for three-judge panel of the Third Circuit, Judge Smith rejected the ACLU's "novel [Glomarization] proposal," and stated that "ample evidence" was available in support of Judge Salas' decision. Smith further noted that it would be "hard to imagine how the FBI could provide a more detailed justification for withholding information under this exemption without compromising the very information it sought to protect."[7][8] | |
Before the U.S. Supreme Court
This section focuses on cases the U.S. Supreme Court heard that originated in this court. To suggest cases we should cover here,email us.
2025-2026 term
The following cases were scheduled for argument before the U.S. Supreme Court during the 2025-2026 term.
| 2025-2026 U.S. Supreme Court cases from the 3rd Circuit | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Case | Opinion author | Decision | Vote |
| Berk v. Choy | Amy Coney Barrett | reversed andremanded | 9-0 |
| Rutherford v. United States | TBD | TBD | TBD |
| First Choice Women’s Resource Centers, Inc. v. Platkin | TBD | TBD | TBD |
2024-2025 term
The following cases were heard for argument before the U.S. Supreme Court during the 2024-2025 term.
| 2024-2025 U.S. Supreme Court cases from the 3rd Circuit | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Case | Opinion author | Decision | Vote |
| Kousisis v. United States | Amy Coney Barrett | affirmed | 9-0 |
| Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Zuch | Amy Coney Barrett | reversed andremanded | 8-1 |
2023-2024 term
The following cases were heard for argument before the U.S. Supreme Court during the 2023-2024 term.
| 2023-2024 U.S. Supreme Court cases from the 3rd Circuit | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Case | Opinion author | Decision | Vote |
| Brown v. United States (Consolidated withJackson v. United States) | Samuel Alito | affirmed | 6-3 |
| Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Co., LLC | Brett Kavanaugh | reversed | 9-0 |
| Wilkinson v. Garland | Sonia Sotomayor | reversed in part,vacated in part, andremanded | 6-3 |
| Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. Kirtz | Neil Gorsuch | affirmed | 9-0 |
2022-2023 term
The following cases were heard for argument before the U.S. Supreme Court during the 2022-2023 term.
| 2022-2023 U.S. Supreme Court cases from the 3rd Circuit | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Case | Opinion author | Decision | Vote |
| United States, ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc. | Elena Kagan | affirmed | 8-1 |
| Groff v. DeJoy | Samuel Alito | vacated andremanded | 9-0 |
2021-2022 term
The following cases were heard before the U.S. Supreme Court during the 2021-2022 term.
| 2021-2022 U.S. Supreme Court cases from the 3rd Circuit | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Case | Opinion author | Decision | Vote |
| Johnson v. Arteaga-Martinez | Sonia Sotomayor | reversed andremanded | 8-1 |
2020-2021 term
The following cases were heard before the U.S. Supreme Court during the 2020-2021 term.
| 2020-2021 U.S. Supreme Court cases from the 3rd Circuit | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Case | Opinion author | Decision | Vote |
| Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania | Chief Justice John Roberts | reversed andremanded | 9-0 |
| Carney v. Adams | Stephen Breyer | vacated andremanded | 8-0 |
| FCC v. Prometheus Radio Project (Consolidated withNational Association of Broadcasters v. Prometheus Radio Project) | Brett Kavanaugh | reversed | 9-0 |
| Sanchez v. Mayorkas | Elena Kagan | affirmed | 9-0 |
| Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L. | Stephen Breyer | affirmed | 8-1 |
| PennEast Pipeline Co. v. New Jersey | John Roberts | reversed andremanded | 5-4 |
2019-2020 term
The following cases were heard before the U.S. Supreme Court during the 2019-2020 term.
| 2019-2020 U.S. Supreme Court cases from the 3rd Circuit | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Case | Opinion author | Decision | Vote |
| Rotkiske v. Klemm | Clarence Thomas | affirmed | 8-1 |
| CITGO Asphalt Refining Co. v. Frescati Shipping Co., Ltd. | Sonia Sotomayor | affirmed | 7-2 |
| Kelly v. United States | Elena Kagan | reversed andremanded | 9-0 |
| Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania (Consolidated withTrump v. Pennsylvania) | Clarence Thomas | reversed andremanded | 7-2 |
Former judges
Former chief judges
In order to qualify for the office ofchief judge in an Article III circuit or district court, or on theUnited States Court of International Trade, a judge must be in active service and hold seniority over the court's commissioned judges who are 64 years of age or under, have served one year or more, and have not previously served as chief judge.[9]
In the event that no judge on the court meets those qualifications, the youngest judge in regular active service aged 65 years or more and who has served as a judge for one year or more shall become chief judge. If no judge meets those qualifications, the judge holding seniority in active service who has not served as chief before shall become the chief judge.[10][11][12]
The chief judge serves for a term of seven years until another judge becomes eligible to serve in the position. No judge is permitted to serve as chief judge after reaching the age of 70 years unless no other judge is qualified to serve.[10][11][12]
Unlike the chief justice of the United States, a chief judge returns to active service after the expiration of their term and does not create a vacancy on the court by the fact of their promotion.[9][10][11][12]
On theUnited States Court of Federal Claims, the chief judge is selected by thepresident of the United States. The judge must be less than 70 years of age. A chief may serve until they reach age 70 or until another judge is designated by the president as the new chief judge. If the president selects a new chief judge, the former chief judge may continue active service on the court for the remainder of their appointed term.[13]
|
|
Federal courthouse
The Third Circuit shares the James A. Byrne Federal Courthouse with theEastern District of Pennsylvania located in Center CityPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania. The courthouse was designed by LZA Technology and opened in 1975 as part of the Bicentennial of the Declaration of Independence celebration.[14][15]
About United States Courts of Appeals
TheUnited States courts of appeals (orcircuit courts) are the intermediateappellate courts of theUnited States federal courts. The court of appeals was originally created in 1891 and has grown to include thirteen courts.
A court of appeals decides appeals from any of thedistrict courts that are in its federal judicial circuit. The appeals courts also can hear appeals from some administrative agencies. Decisions of the federal appeals courts can, in turn, be appealed to theSupreme Court of the United States.
There are thirteen United States courts of appeals. In addition, there are other federal courts (such as theCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces, which hears appeals in court-martial cases) that have "Court of Appeals" in their titles.
The eleven numbered circuits and theD.C. Circuit are defined by geography. The thirteenth court of appeal is theCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. This court has nationwide jurisdiction over certain types of appeals based on what the underlying legal case is about.
All of the courts of appeals also hear appeals from some administrative agency decisions and rulemaking. The largest share of this type of case is heard by the D.C. Circuit. The Federal Circuit hears appeals from specialized trial courts, primarily theCourt of International Trade and theCourt of Federal Claims, as well as appeals from the district courts inpatent cases and certain other specialized matters.
Federal circuit court judges are appointed for life. They are paid approximately $179,500 annually. At the age of 65, a federal judge may choose to retire with his or her full salary. Judges may also choose to go onsenior status at age 65, if they have served actively for 15 years.[16]
Appointments by president
The chart below shows the number of appeals court judges confirmed by the U.S. Senate through February 1 of the second year of each president's second term in office. At this point in the term, President Obama had the most appeals court appointments with 12.
Judges by circuit
- See also:Judicial vacancies in federal courts
The table below displays the number of judges in each circuit and indicates how many were appointed by presidents from each major political party. It also includes the number of vacancies on a circuit and how many pending nominations for that circuit are before theUnited States Senate. The table can be sorted by clicking the column headers above the line. It is updated every Monday.
See also
- Federal courts
- Federal judge
- United States Court of Appeals
- District of Delaware
- District of New Jersey
- Eastern District of Pennsylvania
- Middle District of Pennsylvania
- Western District of Pennsylvania
External links
- Official Website of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals
- List of Third Circuit Judges
- Opinions of the Third Circuit
- Federal Judicial Center - About the Third Circuit
Footnotes
- ↑United States Courts, "FAQs: Federal Judges: What is a senior judge?" accessed December 19, 2016
- ↑2.02.1Federal Judicial Center, "U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit: Legislative History," accessed May 5, 2021
- ↑3.03.13.2PennLive.com, "U.S. Appeals Court backs Pa. judge retirement mandate," April 29, 2014
- ↑4.04.14.24.34.4RT, "AT&T hacker ‘weev’ to walk free after appeals court agrees to vacate conviction," April 11, 2014
- ↑5.05.1Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑6.06.16.2Courthouse News Service, "Exposing Not-So Secret Affair Isn't Defamatory," April 22, 2014 (archived)
- ↑Courthouse News Service, "ACLU Sues FBI for Racial Profiling Info," May 6, 2011
- ↑Courthouse News Service, "Court Keeps a Lid on FBI's Racial Profiling Records," October 25, 2013 (archived)
- ↑9.09.1United States Courts, "Frequently Asked Questions," accessed January 25, 2022
- ↑10.010.110.2Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute, "28 U.S. Code § 136 - Chief judges; precedence of district judges," accessed January 25, 2022
- ↑11.011.111.2Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute, "28 U.S. Code § 258 - Chief judges; precedence of judges," accessed January 25, 2022
- ↑12.012.112.2Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute, "28 U.S. Code § 45 - Chief judges; precedence of judges," accessed January 25, 2022
- ↑Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute, "28 U.S. Code § 171 - Appointment and number of judges; character of court; designation of chief judge," accessed January 25, 2022
- ↑Third Branch News, "Appellate Court Saves Money by Making Chambers Space Go Farther," December 4, 2013
- ↑Courthouse News Service, "3rd Circuit Saves Money by Sharing Offices," December 10, 2013 (archive)
- ↑United States Courts, "FAQs: Federal Judges," accessed May 5, 2021
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||