State legislative elections, 2026
| 2026 State Legislative Elections | |
|---|---|
2027» «2025 | |
In the 50 states, there are99 state legislative chambers altogether. Across 46 states, 88 of those chambers are holding regular legislative elections in 2026. The general election for state legislative races is onNovember 3, 2026.
States are also holdingspecial state legislative elections in 2026 to fill vacant seats.Click here for more.
In theU.S. Territories, five legislative chambers are holding regularly scheduled elections in 2026. Elections will be held for the American SamoaHouse of Representatives, theGuam Legislature, the Northern Mariana IslandsSenate andHouse of Representatives, and theU.S. Virgin Islands Legislature.
Two state legislative chambers, theMichigan andMinnesota state Houses, changed party control following the2024 general election. Republicans won control of theMichigan House from Democrats, and secured a tie in theMinnesota House.
There wereelections for the members of 85 of the nation's 99 legislative chambers in 2024, representing 5,807 of the country's 7,386 state legislative seats (79%).
- Partisan balanceThe partisan balance of state legislaturesRead more
- BattlegroundsInformation on battleground electionsRead more
- On the ballotA list of elections on the ballotRead more
- Pre-election analysisAnalysis published before the electionRead more
- Important dates and deadlinesA list of important dates and deadlines for the 2026 election cycleRead more
Partisan balance
As ofFebruary 16th, 2026, Republicans controlled55.12% of all state legislative seats nationally, while Democrats held43.89%. Republicans held a majority in57 chambers, and Democrats held the majority in39 chambers.Two chambers (Alaska House andAlaska Senate) were organized undermultipartisan, power-sharing coalitions.One chamber (Minnesota House of Representatives) was split evenly between both parties.
| Partisan balance of all 7,386 state legislative seats | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Legislative chamber | ![]() | ![]() | Other | Vacant | ||||
| State senates | 837 | 1,120 | 6 | 10 | ||||
| State houses | 2,405 | 2,951 | 20 | 37 | ||||
| Total: | 3,242 | 4,071 | 26 | 47 | ||||
Battlegrounds
Click the tabs below to view detailed information regarding battleground districts in the 2026 state legislative elections. In this section, you will find:
- A list of districts targeted by each political party
DLCC targets
TheDemocratic Legislative Campaign Committee announced they would target the following chambers in the2026 elections:[1]
- Alaska House andAlaska Senate
- Arizona House andArizona Senate
- Michigan House andMichigan Senate
- Minnesota House andMinnesota Senate
- New Hampshire House andNew Hampshire Senate
- Pennsylvania House
- Wisconsin Assembly andWisconsin Senate
In addition to those battleground chambers, the DLCC also announced plans to help Democrats:[2]
- Pick up seats in theGeorgia House andGeorgia Senate,Maine House andMaine Senate,Nebraska Senate,Pennsylvania Senate, andTexas House.
- Break or prevent Republican supermajorities in theFlorida House andFlorida Senate,Indiana House,Iowa House andIowa Senate,Kansas House,Missouri House andMissouri Senate,North Carolina House andNorth Carolina Senate,Ohio House, andSouth Carolina House
- Build Democratic supermajorities in theColorado House andColorado Senate,Delaware House,Nevada Assembly,New Mexico House,New York Senate,Oregon Senate,Vermont House andVermont Senate, andWashington House
RSLC targets
TheRepublican State Leadership Committee announced they would target the following chambers in the2026 elections:[3]
On the ballot
Click the tabs below to view information about the elections this year. In this section, you will find:
- A list of states holding elections
- Information about special elections
- Ballotpedia's Sample Ballot Lookup Tool
The table below highlights each state holding legislative elections in 2026. To learn more about elections in a particular chamber, click the link in the chamber column.
| State | Chamber | Republican | Democratic | Other | Vacancies | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | House | 76 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 105 |
| Alabama | Senate | 27 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 35 |
| Alaska | House | 21 | 14 | 5 | 0 | 40 |
| Alaska | Senate | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Arizona | House | 33 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 60 |
| Arizona | Senate | 17 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 30 |
| Arkansas | House | 80 | 19 | 0 | 1 | 100 |
| Arkansas | Senate | 13 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 17 |
| California | House | 20 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 80 |
| California | Senate | 6 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
| Colorado | House | 22 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 65 |
| Colorado | Senate | 7 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 18 |
| Connecticut | House | 49 | 102 | 0 | 0 | 151 |
| Connecticut | Senate | 11 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 36 |
| Delaware | House | 14 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 41 |
| Delaware | Senate | 3 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
| Florida | House | 84 | 33 | 0 | 3 | 120 |
| Florida | Senate | 13 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 20 |
| Georgia | House | 99 | 79 | 0 | 2 | 180 |
| Georgia | Senate | 31 | 23 | 0 | 2 | 56 |
| Hawaii | House | 9 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 51 |
| Hawaii | Senate | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 13 |
| Idaho | House | 61 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 70 |
| Idaho | Senate | 29 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 35 |
| Illinois | House | 40 | 78 | 0 | 0 | 118 |
| Illinois | Senate | 16 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 39 |
| Indiana | House | 70 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| Indiana | Senate | 22 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 25 |
| Iowa | House | 67 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| Iowa | Senate | 14 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 25 |
| Kansas | House | 88 | 37 | 0 | 0 | 125 |
| Kentucky | House | 80 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| Kentucky | Senate | 18 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 19 |
| Maine | House | 72 | 74 | 3 | 2 | 151 |
| Maine | Senate | 14 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 35 |
| Maryland | House | 39 | 102 | 0 | 0 | 141 |
| Maryland | Senate | 13 | 34 | 0 | 0 | 47 |
| Massachusetts | House | 25 | 132 | 1 | 2 | 160 |
| Massachusetts | Senate | 5 | 34 | 0 | 1 | 40 |
| Michigan | House | 58 | 52 | 0 | 0 | 110 |
| Michigan | Senate | 18 | 19 | 0 | 1 | 38 |
| Minnesota | House | 67 | 67 | 0 | 0 | 134 |
| Minnesota | Senate | 33 | 34 | 0 | 0 | 67 |
| Missouri | House | 106 | 52 | 0 | 5 | 163 |
| Missouri | Senate | 14 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 17 |
| Montana | House | 58 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| Montana | Senate | 16 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 25 |
| Nebraska | Senate | 17 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 24 |
| Nevada | House | 15 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 42 |
| Nevada | Senate | 4 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
| New Hampshire | House | 217 | 176 | 1 | 6 | 400 |
| New Hampshire | Senate | 16 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 24 |
| New Mexico | House | 26 | 44 | 0 | 0 | 70 |
| New York | House | 47 | 103 | 0 | 0 | 150 |
| New York | Senate | 22 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 63 |
| North Carolina | House | 71 | 49 | 0 | 0 | 120 |
| North Carolina | Senate | 30 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 50 |
| North Dakota | House | 40 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 46 |
| North Dakota | Senate | 21 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 24 |
| Ohio | House | 65 | 34 | 0 | 0 | 99 |
| Ohio | Senate | 11 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 17 |
| Oklahoma | House | 80 | 18 | 0 | 3 | 101 |
| Oklahoma | Senate | 18 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 24 |
| Oregon | House | 23 | 37 | 0 | 0 | 60 |
| Oregon | Senate | 4 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
| Pennsylvania | House | 98 | 100 | 0 | 5 | 203 |
| Pennsylvania | Senate | 12 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 25 |
| Rhode Island | House | 10 | 64 | 1 | 0 | 75 |
| Rhode Island | Senate | 4 | 34 | 0 | 0 | 38 |
| South Carolina | House | 88 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 124 |
| South Dakota | House | 65 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 70 |
| South Dakota | Senate | 32 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 35 |
| Tennessee | House | 75 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 99 |
| Tennessee | Senate | 13 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 17 |
| Texas | House | 88 | 62 | 0 | 0 | 150 |
| Texas | Senate | 10 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 16 |
| Utah | House | 61 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 75 |
| Utah | Senate | 10 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 15 |
| Vermont | House | 55 | 87 | 7 | 1 | 150 |
| Vermont | Senate | 13 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 30 |
| Washington | House | 39 | 59 | 0 | 0 | 98 |
| Washington | Senate | 7 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 24 |
| West Virginia | House | 90 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 100 |
| West Virginia | Senate | 32 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 34 |
| Wisconsin | House | 54 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 99 |
| Wisconsin | Senate | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 17 |
| Wyoming | House | 56 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 62 |
| Wyoming | Senate | 14 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 16 |
Pre-election analysis
Click the tabs below to view detailed analysis from before the election. In this section, you will find:
- Historical data related to competitiveness
- Information about state government trifectas
- Chambers that changed partisan control from 2010 to 2025
- Trifecta status from 2010 to 2025
Ballotpedia began examining thecompetitiveness of every state legislative race in the country in 2010. Three factors are used in this analysis: seats where the incumbent did not run for re-election, incumbents who ran in contested primaries, and seats contested by both major parties.
The following table details competitiveness data collected from regularly scheduled state legislative elections between 2010 and 2025. Odd-year elections are shown grouped together first followed by even-year elections.
| Competitiveness in state legislative elections (2010-2024) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | Total seats | Open seats | No major party competition | Incs. running | Incs. in contested primaries | ||||
| # | % | # | % | # | % | ||||
| Even-year elections | |||||||||
| 2024 | 5,807 | 962 | 16.6% | 2,224 | 38.3% | 4,853 | 1,039 | 21.4% | |
| 2022 | 6,278 | 1,492 | 23.8% | 2,559 | 40.8% | 4,852 | 1,299 | 26.8% | |
| 2020 | 5,875 | 876 | 14.9% | 2,044 | 34.8% | 4,999 | 1,006 | 20.1% | |
| 2018 | 6,067 | 1,194 | 19.7% | 2,046 | 33.7% | 4,876 | 1,082 | 22.2% | |
| 2016 | 5,916 | 1,032 | 17.4% | 2,508 | 42.4% | 4,887 | 985 | 20.2% | |
| 2014 | 6,051 | 1,019 | 16.8% | 2,663 | 44.0% | 5,041 | 983 | 19.5% | |
| 2012 | 6,013 | 1,314 | 21.9% | 2,384 | 39.6% | 4,790 | 1,117 | 23.3% | |
| 2010 | 6,127 | 1,143 | 18.7% | 2,142 | 35.0% | 4,984 | 995 | 20.0% | |
| Odd-year elections | |||||||||
| 2025 | 180 | 8 | 4.4% | 22 | 12.2% | 171 | 38 | 22.2% | |
| 2023 | 578 | 138 | 23.9% | 319 | 55.2% | 443 | 115 | 26.0% | |
| 2021 | 220 | 17 | 7.7% | 16 | 7.3% | 203 | 40 | 19.7% | |
| 2019 | 538 | 105 | 19.5% | 301 | 55.9% | 433 | 125 | 28.9% | |
| 2017 | 220 | 20 | 9.1% | 45 | 20.5% | 200 | 32 | 16.0% | |
| 2015 | 538 | 79 | 14.7% | 332 | 61.7% | 460 | 107 | 23.3% | |
| 2013 | 220 | 15 | 6.8% | 61 | 27.7% | 205 | 24 | 11.7% | |
| 2011 | 578 | 98 | 17.0% | 312 | 54.0% | 485 | 104 | 21.4% | |
Election coverage by office
U.S. SenateRead more
U.S. HouseRead more
GovernorsRead more
Secretary of stateRead more
Attorney generalRead more
Other state executivesRead more
State legislaturesRead more
State ballot measuresRead more
Local ballot measuresRead more
State judgesRead more
Local judgesRead more
Municipal governmentRead more
School boardsRead more
RecallsRead more
See also
- Past state legislative elections:2025 •2024 •2023 •2022 •2021 •2020 •2019 •2018 •2017 •2016
- Past state legislative special elections:2025 •2024 •2023 •2022 •2021 •2020 •2019 •2018 •2017 •2016
- Past election analysis:2025 •2024 •2023 •2022 •2021 •2020 •2019 •2018
Footnotes
- ↑NBC News, "Democrats unveil state legislative map for the next election cycle, with eyes on opposing Trump's agenda and redistricting," February 11, 2025
- ↑Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee, "The DLCC Target Map 2026," accessed December 22, 2025
- ↑RSLC, "MEMO: The New Redistricting Arms Race: How Winning Down-Ballot Elections in 2026 Are Essential for Republicans in 2029," October 31, 2025
- ↑The Washington Post, "Virginia Republicans snatched control of the state Senate, ended budget-Medicaid impasse," June 9, 2014
- ↑2025, 2015, and 2013 are not included because no chambers changed those years.
- ↑Chamber went from a Democratic majority to a 67-67 tie.
- ↑Chamber went from a Republican majority to a bipartisan governing coalition.
- ↑Democrats won a majority of seats, but did not have a majority when the legislative session began due to vacancies created during the interim.
- ↑Chamber went from being controlled by a Democratic-led bipartisan coalition to being led by a coalition with power split between the parties.
- ↑In this election, the Oregon House changed from a 30-30 tie to a 34-26 Democratic advantage.
- ↑The chamber first changed from Democratic to Republican control in a February 2011 special election. Republicans increased their majority to 24-15 in the 2011 elections.
- ↑The chamber changed partisan control prior to the 2011 elections due to Democrats switching to the Republican Party and special election wins by Republicans. Republicans increased their majority in the 2011 elections to 31-21.
- ↑In the 2011 elections, the chamber changed from a 22-18 Democratic advantage to a 20-20 tie. Republicans effectively controlled the chamber because Lieutenant Gov. Bill Bolling (R) could cast tie-breaking votes.
- ↑This chamber did not hold elections in 2010. It switched partisan control in December 2010 when Democrat Noble Ellington changed his party affiliation to Republican. In the regularly-scheduled 2011 elections, Republicans increased their majority to 58-45.
- ↑This chamber went from a 50-50 tie to a 68-32 Republican advantage in the 2010 elections.
- ↑This chamber went from a 36-24 Democratic advantage to a 30-30 tie in the 2010 elections.


