Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot.Click to learn more!

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act

From Ballotpedia
New Administrative State Banner.png
Administrative State
Administrative State Icon Gold.png
Five Pillars of the Administrative State
•Agency control
•Executive control
•Judicial control
•Legislative control
• Public Control
Click here for more coverage of theadministrative state on Ballotpedia.
Click here to accessBallotpedia's administrative state legislation tracker.

TheSmall Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) is a federal law passed in 1996 providing for greater participation of small businesses in the federal regulatory process. It amended and expanded theRegulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) of 1980, which required federal agencies to consider the effects of regulation on small entities such as small businesses,nonprofit organizations, and local governments. The SBREFA permittedjudicial review of alleged agency violations of the RFA. It also established requirements for federal agencies to provide small businesses with compliance assistance and opportunities for input in the regulatory process.[1][2]

Background

See also:Regulatory Flexibility Act

The SBREFA was signed into law by PresidentBill Clinton on March 29, 1996. It was part of the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, legislation that also included theCongressional Review Act.[3][4][5] The SBREFA amended theRegulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) of 1980, which had established requirements for federal agencies to consider the effects of regulation on small entities such as small businesses,nonprofit organizations, and local governments.[6]

According toInc. magazine, "by the early 1990s there was a growing clamor in the small business community and Congress for an amended RFA." In 1993, PresidentBill Clinton'sExecutive Order 12866 directed agencies to adhere to the RFA and its principles.[2] The SBREFA amended and expanded the requirements of the RFA, which was later amended again by the 2010Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the 2010 Small Business Jobs Act.[6]

Provisions

Judicial review of RFA compliance

The SBREFA guaranteedjudicial review for small entities that believe an agency violated the RFA. TheU.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) administers and monitors agency compliance with both the RFA and the SBREFA. According to a 1996 summary of the SBREFA provided by the SBA:[1]

“Many agencies have failed to comply with the RFA over the past 16 years, and small businesses found little recourse in the courts due to the absence of any enforcement mechanism. The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act corrects that by permitting judicial review of agencies' compliance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act.


Whenever a small business is adversely affected or aggrieved by an agency rulemaking for failure to comply with the RFA, the small business may seek review of the rule in court. The RFA now also applies to previously exempt interpretative rulemakings promulgated by the Internal Revenue Service that have information collection requirements.[7]

”
—U.S. Small Business Administration, "Summary of SBREFA" (1996)[1]


The SBREFA also enhanced the authority of the SBA Office of Advocacy to fileamicus curiae briefs in court proceedings dealing with alleged agency violations of the RFA. According to the SBA, "the following issues are subject to judicial review under the SBREFA:"[1]

“
  • the final regulatory flexibility analysis including the agency's efforts to evaluate alternative regulatory approaches and reasons for rejecting or accepting them;
  • the agency's effort to collect comments from small entities through a variety of mechanisms;
  • the agency's decision to certify that a rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities, and the factual basis for the certification;
  • the agency's compliance with a requirement for periodic reviews at the 10-year anniversary of every rule or the enactment of the 1980 law, which ever is first.[7]
”
—U.S. Small Business Administration, "Summary of SBREFA" (1996)[1]

Compliance assistance for small businesses

The SBREFA established requirements for federal agencies to publish regulatory compliance guides for all rules with a significant impact on small businesses. According to the SBA, "these guides must explain in plain language how the firms can comply with the regulations. If a small business is cited for a violation of a regulation, the court review may include the content of the small business compliance guide in assessing the reasonableness of the proposed penalty." Additionally, the act directed agencies to establish systems for addressing small business compliance inquiries. According to the SBA, "any guidance provided by an agency will be considered as evidence of the reasonableness of proposed penalties, fines or damages assessed against a small entity."[1]

Small business responses to regulatory enforcement actions

The SBREFA established a process for small businesses to register complaints about regulatory enforcement actions with the SBA. Complaints can be registered with the SBA ombudsman or a regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Board. The position of ombudsman and the regional boards were created by the SBREFA. The act also required federal agencies to establish policies providing for the reduction or waiver of civil penalties assessed against small businesses for violating statutory or regulatory requirements.[1]

Finally, the SBREFA expanded provisions of the Equal Access to Justice Act of 1980 allowing small businesses to recover attorney fees and other expenses resulting from administrative or judicial proceedings with the government. Fees may be recovered if the government's demands in a case are found to be unreasonable when compared with the actual outcome of the litigation.[1]

Periodic review of existing rules

See also:Retrospective regulatory review

The SBREFA added additionalperiodic review requirements to the RFA.[2] The RFA, as amended by the SBREFA, includes a requirement for federal agencies to "publish in theFederal Register a plan for the periodic review of the rules issued by the agency which have or will have a significant economic impact upon a substantial number of small entities."[6]

Additional requirements for covered agencies

The RFA and SBREFA impose additional reporting and review requirements on what they refer to as acovered agency, a term which includes the following:[6]

According to a summary of the requirements for covered agencies from theEnvironmental Protection Agency:[8]

“The purpose of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA), is to fit regulatory requirements to the scale of the businesses, organizations, and governmental jurisdictions subject to the regulation. The RFA requires that agencies determine, to the extent feasible, the rule's economic impact on small entities, explore regulatory options for reducing any significant economic impact on a substantial number of such entities, and explain their ultimate choice of regulatory approach. The Agency refers to the RFA as amended by SBREFA simply as the RFA.


Unless the Agency certifies that a rule does not have a Significant Economic Impact on a Substantial Number Of Small Entities (SISNOSE), RFA requires a formal analysis of the potential adverse economic impacts on small entities, completion of a Small Business Advocacy Review Panel (proposed rule stage), preparation of a Small Entity Compliance Guide (final rule stage), and Agency review of the rule within 10 years of promulgation. Agency compliance with many of the RFA requirements is judicially reviewable.[7]

”
—Environmental Protection Agency[8]


*Note: The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was created by theDodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and added to the definition ofcovered agency for the purposes of the RFA and SBREFA.[9][10]

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. ↑1.01.11.21.31.41.51.61.7U.S. Small Business Administration, "Summary of SBREFA," accessed February 20, 2018
  2. ↑2.02.12.2Inc., "Regulatory Flexibility Act," accessed September 11, 2017
  3. ↑U.S. Government Publishing Office, "Public Law 104–121—Mar. 29, 1996," accessed February 20, 2018
  4. ↑U.S. Small Business Administration, "SBREFA Legislative History," accessed February 20, 2018
  5. ↑Congress.gov, "H.R.3136 - Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996," accessed February 20, 2018
  6. ↑6.06.16.26.3Small Business Administration, "The Regulatory Flexibility Act," accessed September 11, 2017
  7. ↑7.07.17.2Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  8. ↑8.08.1Environmental Protection Agency, "Summary of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act," last updated October 17, 2016
  9. ↑Legal Information Institute, "5 U.S. Code § 609 - Procedures for gathering comments," accessed February 21, 2018
  10. ↑U.S. Government Publishing Office, "Public Law 111-203 - Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act," accessed February 21, 2018
v • e
The Administrative State
MainThe Administrative State Project Badge.png
Pillars
Reporting
Laws
Administrative Procedure Act •Antiquities Act •Civil Service Reform Act •Clayton Antitrust Act •Communications Act of 1934 •Congressional Review Act •Electronic Freedom of Information Act •Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938 •Federal Housekeeping Statute •Federal Reserve Act •Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 •Freedom of Information Act •Government in the Sunshine Act •Independent Offices Appropriations Act of 1952 •Information Quality Act •Interstate Commerce Act •National Labor Relations Act •Paperwork Reduction Act •Pendleton Act •Privacy Act of 1974 •Regulatory Flexibility Act •REINS Act •REINS Act (Wisconsin) •Securities Act of 1933 •Securities Exchange Act of 1934 •Sherman Antitrust Act •Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act •Truth in Regulating Act •Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Cases
Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner •A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States •Association of Data Processing Service Organizations v. Camp •Auer v. Robbins •Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council •Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe •Federal Trade Commission (FTC) v. Standard Oil Company of California •Field v. Clark •Food and Drug Administration v. Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation •Humphrey's Executor v. United States •Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) v. Chadha •J.W. Hampton Jr. & Company v. United States •Lucia v. SEC •Marshall v. Barlow's •Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency •Mistretta v. United States •National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) v. Sebelius •National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning Company •National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. •Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan •Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation •Skidmore v. Swift & Co. •United States v. Lopez •United States v. Western Pacific Railroad Co. •Universal Camera Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board •Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council •Wayman v. Southard •Weyerhaeuser Company v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service •Whitman v. American Trucking Associations •Wickard v. Filburn •Wiener v. United States
Terms
Adjudication (administrative state) •Administrative judge •Administrative law •Administrative law judge •Administrative state •Arbitrary-or-capricious test •Auer deference •Barrier to entry •Bootleggers and Baptists •Chevron deference (doctrine) •Civil servant •Civil service •Code of Federal Regulations •Codify (administrative state) •Comment period •Compliance costs •Congressional Record •Coordination (administrative state) •Deference (administrative state) •Direct and indirect costs (administrative state) •Enabling statute •Ex parte communication (administrative state) •Executive agency •Federal law •Federal Register •Federalism •Final rule •Formal rulemaking •Formalism (law) •Functionalism (law) •Guidance (administrative state) •Hybrid rulemaking •Incorporation by reference •Independent federal agency •Informal rulemaking •Joint resolution of disapproval (administrative state) •Major rule •Negotiated rulemaking •Nondelegation doctrine •OIRA prompt letter •Organic statute •Pragmatism (law) •Precautionary principle •Promulgate •Proposed rule •Publication rulemaking •Regulatory budget •Regulatory capture •Regulatory dark matter •Regulatory impact analysis •Regulatory policy officer •Regulatory reform officer •Regulatory review •Rent seeking •Retrospective regulatory review •Risk assessment (administrative state) •Rulemaking •Separation of powers •Significant regulatory action •Skidmore deference •Statutory authority •Substantive law and procedural law •Sue and settle •Sunset provision •Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions •United States Code •United States Statutes at Large
Bibliography
Agencies
Ballotpedia
Editorial Content
Josh Altic, Director of Content •Daniel Anderson, Associate Director of Elections & Data •Cory Eucalitto, Associate Director of Features •Ryan Byrne, Managing Editor of Ballot Measures •Mandy McConnell, Managing Editor of News •Doug Kronaizl, Managing Editor of Local Expansion •Abbey Smith, Managing Editor of Elections •Janie Valentine, Managing Editor of Law •Joel Williams, Managing Editor of Events •Joseph Greaney, Managing Editor of Policy •Andrew Bahl •Jaclyn Beran •Marielle Bricker •Joseph Brusgard •Emma Burlingame •Kelly Coyle •Jon Dunn •Victoria Edwards •Thomas Ellis •Nicole Fisher •Thomas Grobben •Brianna Hosea •Molly Kehoe •Tyler King •Glorie Martinez •Norm Leahy, Senior Editor •Nathan Maxwell •Jimmy McAllister •Brandon McCauley •Andrew McNair •Ellie Mikus •Mackenzie Murphy •Kaley Platek •Samantha Post •Adam Powell •Annelise Reinwald •Spencer Richardson •Victoria Rose •Briana Ryan •Myj Saintyl •Maddy Salucka •Emma Soukup •Alexis Thacker •Mina Vogel •Samuel Wonacott •Trenton Woodcox