Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot.Click to learn more!

Regulatory dark matter

From Ballotpedia
New Administrative State Banner.png
Administrative State
Administrative State Icon Gold.png
Five Pillars of the Administrative State
Agency control
Executive control
Judicial control
Legislative control
Public Control

Click here for more coverage of theadministrative state on Ballotpedia.
Click here to accessBallotpedia's administrative state legislation tracker.


Regulatory dark matter is a term coined by policy analyst Clyde Wayne Crews Jr. to describe, in his words, "executive branch and federal agency proclamations and issuances such as memoranda,guidance documents, bulletins, circulars, announcements and the like with practical if not always technically legally binding regulatory effect."[1][2] Crews is critical of what he callsregulatory dark matter because he believes agencies sometimes use these proclamations and issuances to impose practical requirements, set policy- and decision-making priorities, and take other actions that exceed the intent ofCongress or avoid federalrulemaking procedures.[3][4][5]

As of October 2017, Crews had published two reports on regulatory dark matter with theCompetitive Enterprise Institute (CEI).[6][3] Other critics ofthe administrative state, including writers forThe American Spectator,National Review, and the CEI, have also employed the term.[7][8][9]

Background

See also:Guidance (administrative state)

The concept ofregulatory dark matter was developed and named by Clyde Wayne Crews Jr., who as of October 2017 was vice president for policy and director of technology studies at theCompetitive Enterprise Institute, a libertarian think tank.[2][10] According to Crews' first report on regulatory dark matter, published by the CEI in December 2015, the term is derived from a concept in physics known asdark matter:[3]

Astrophysicists have concluded that ordinary visible matter—the Sun, the Moon, the planets, the Milky Way, the multitudes of galaxies beyond our own, and their trillions of component stars, planets, and gas clouds—make up only a tiny fraction of the universe. ... Instead, dark matter and dark energy make up most of the universe, rendering the bulk of existence beyond our ability to directly observe. Here on Earth, in the United States, there is also 'regulatory dark matter' that is hard to detect, much less measure.[11]
—Clyde Wayne Crews Jr., "Mapping Washington's Lawlessness 2016"[3]


Crews applies the term to, in his words, "executive branch and federal agency proclamations and issuances such as memoranda,guidance documents, bulletins, circulars, announcements and the like with practical if not always technically legally binding regulatory effect."[1] He refers to these regulatory actions asdark matter because they are exempt from the requirements of theAdministrative Procedure Act (APA), a federal law passed in 1946 establishing uniform procedures for federal agencies to propose and issue regulations, a process known asrulemaking.[3][12][13]

Crews is critical of what he callsregulatory dark matter because, according to his first report, agencies can use these proclamations and issuances to impose practical requirements, set policy- and decision-making priorities, and take other actions "without Congress actually passing a law or an APA-compliant legislative rule or regulation being issued."[3][4][5]

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.01.1SSRN, "Mapping Washington's Lawlessness: A Preliminary Inventory of Regulatory Dark Matter (2017 Edition)," February 18, 2016
  2. 2.02.1Competitive Enterprise Institute, "Regulatory Dark Matter," accessed October 2, 2017
  3. 3.03.13.23.33.43.5Competitive Enterprise Institute, "Mapping Washington's Lawlessness 2016: A Preliminary Inventory of 'Regulatory Dark Matter,'" December 2015
  4. 4.04.1The Washington Post, "Trump's team has detected the 'dark matter' of government regulation, meaning you ain't seen nothing yet," February 1, 2017
  5. 5.05.1National Review, "It's Time to Shine a Light on Regulatory 'Dark Matter,'" February 20, 2017
  6. Competitive Enterprise Institute, "Mapping Washington's Lawlessness: An Inventory of 'Regulatory Dark Matter,' 2017 edition," March 2017
  7. The American Spectator, "Markle Interests: Administrative Overreach and Regulatory Dark Matter," October 19, 2017
  8. National Review, "It’s Time to Shine a Light on Regulatory ‘Dark Matter,'" February 20, 2017
  9. Competitive Enterprise Institute, "Education Department Withdraws 'Dear Colleague' Letter Restricting Student and Faculty Rights," September 22, 2017
  10. Competitive Enterprise Institute, "Clyde Wayne Crews," accessed October 2, 2017
  11. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  12. The Regulatory Group, "Regulatory Glossary," accessed August 4, 2017
  13. Electronic Privacy Information Center, "The Administrative Procedure Act (APA)," accessed August 14, 2017
v  e
The Administrative State
MainThe Administrative State Project Badge.png
Pillars
Reporting
Laws
Administrative Procedure ActAntiquities ActCivil Service Reform ActClayton Antitrust ActCommunications Act of 1934Congressional Review ActElectronic Freedom of Information ActFederal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938Federal Housekeeping StatuteFederal Reserve ActFederal Trade Commission Act of 1914Freedom of Information ActGovernment in the Sunshine ActIndependent Offices Appropriations Act of 1952Information Quality ActInterstate Commerce ActNational Labor Relations ActPaperwork Reduction ActPendleton ActPrivacy Act of 1974Regulatory Flexibility ActREINS ActREINS Act (Wisconsin)Securities Act of 1933Securities Exchange Act of 1934Sherman Antitrust ActSmall Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness ActTruth in Regulating ActUnfunded Mandates Reform Act
Cases
Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerA.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesAssociation of Data Processing Service Organizations v. CampAuer v. RobbinsChevron v. Natural Resources Defense CouncilCitizens to Preserve Overton Park v. VolpeFederal Trade Commission (FTC) v. Standard Oil Company of CaliforniaField v. ClarkFood and Drug Administration v. Brown and Williamson Tobacco CorporationHumphrey's Executor v. United StatesImmigration and Naturalization Service (INS) v. ChadhaJ.W. Hampton Jr. & Company v. United StatesLucia v. SECMarshall v. Barlow'sMassachusetts v. Environmental Protection AgencyMistretta v. United StatesNational Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) v. SebeliusNational Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning CompanyNational Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSecurities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery CorporationSkidmore v. Swift & Co.United States v. LopezUnited States v. Western Pacific Railroad Co.Universal Camera Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardVermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense CouncilWayman v. SouthardWeyerhaeuser Company v. United States Fish and Wildlife ServiceWhitman v. American Trucking AssociationsWickard v. FilburnWiener v. United States
Terms
Adjudication (administrative state)Administrative judgeAdministrative lawAdministrative law judgeAdministrative stateArbitrary-or-capricious testAuer deferenceBarrier to entryBootleggers and BaptistsChevron deference (doctrine)Civil servantCivil serviceCode of Federal RegulationsCodify (administrative state)Comment periodCompliance costsCongressional RecordCoordination (administrative state)Deference (administrative state)Direct and indirect costs (administrative state)Enabling statuteEx parte communication (administrative state)Executive agencyFederal lawFederal RegisterFederalismFinal ruleFormal rulemakingFormalism (law)Functionalism (law)Guidance (administrative state)Hybrid rulemakingIncorporation by referenceIndependent federal agencyInformal rulemakingJoint resolution of disapproval (administrative state)Major ruleNegotiated rulemakingNondelegation doctrineOIRA prompt letterOrganic statutePragmatism (law)Precautionary principlePromulgateProposed rulePublication rulemakingRegulatory budgetRegulatory captureRegulatory dark matterRegulatory impact analysisRegulatory policy officerRegulatory reform officerRegulatory reviewRent seekingRetrospective regulatory reviewRisk assessment (administrative state)RulemakingSeparation of powersSignificant regulatory actionSkidmore deferenceStatutory authoritySubstantive law and procedural lawSue and settleSunset provisionUnified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory ActionsUnited States CodeUnited States Statutes at Large
Bibliography
Agencies
Ballotpedia
Editorial Content
Josh Altic, Director of ContentDaniel Anderson, Associate Director of Elections & DataCory Eucalitto, Associate Director of FeaturesRyan Byrne, Managing Editor of Ballot MeasuresMandy McConnell, Managing Editor of NewsDoug Kronaizl, Managing Editor of Local ExpansionAbbey Smith, Managing Editor of ElectionsJanie Valentine, Managing Editor of LawJoel Williams, Managing Editor of EventsJoseph Greaney, Managing Editor of PolicyAndrew BahlJaclyn BeranMarielle BrickerJoseph BrusgardEmma BurlingameKelly CoyleJon DunnVictoria EdwardsThomas EllisNicole FisherThomas GrobbenBrianna HoseaMolly KehoeTyler KingGlorie MartinezNorm Leahy, Senior EditorNathan MaxwellJimmy McAllisterBrandon McCauleyAndrew McNairEllie MikusMackenzie MurphyKaley PlatekSamantha PostAdam PowellAnnelise ReinwaldSpencer RichardsonVictoria RoseBriana RyanMyj SaintylMaddy SaluckaEmma SoukupAlexis ThackerMina VogelSamuel WonacottTrenton Woodcox