Public policy in Georgia

From Ballotpedia
Public Policy-Main-Masthead.png

Contents



BP-Initials-UPDATED.pngThis article does not contain the most recently published data on this subject. If you would like to help our coverage grow, considerdonating to Ballotpedia.


ThePublic Policy Project on Ballotpedia aims to illuminate major policy issues being discussed and implemented throughout the United States. Public policy can be complicated and controversial; deciding what works best and how to allocate resources to achieve a policy goal can involve multiple trade-offs. Much of the public policy that affects citizens economically, legally and socially, is made at the state level. Below you will find links and introductions to all theGeorgia public policy articles onBallotpedia. To see the policy overview of another state click on themap below.

For a list of all public policy articles onBallotpedia seehere.

Budget Policy

Budget Policy Logo.png

Budget and finances

InGeorgia, as in other states, lawmakers and public officials are elected in part to manage the state's finances. This includes generating revenues (money coming into the state from various sources) and approving expenditures (the money spent on governmental functions and servicingstate debt). State budgets are complex and fluid, as they depend on anticipated revenues and planned expenditures, which may alter over the course of a fiscal year. If revenues do not keep pace with expenditures, states generally have to raise taxes, cut services, borrow money, or a combination of the three. State budget decisions are also influenced by policy decisions at the national level, such as theAffordable Care Act or energy and environmental regulations, and issues at the local level, such as crime and the quality of education.

HIGHLIGHTS
  • Between fiscal years 2015 and 2016, total government spending in Georgia increased by approximately $2.5 billion—from $45.0 billion in fiscal year 2015 to an estimated $47.5 billion in 2016. This represents a 5.5-percent increase.[1]
  • In Georgia in fiscal year 2015, 53.2 percent of total tax revenues came from income taxes.
  • Education accounted for 43.3 percent of state expenditures in fiscal year 2015, while 21.9 percent went to Medicaid.
  • Taxes

    Georgia generates the bulk of its tax revenue by levying apersonal income tax and asales tax. The state derives its constitutional authority to tax fromArticle VII of the state constitution.[2][3]

    Tax policy can vary from state to state. States levy taxes to help fund the variety of services provided by state governments. Tax collections comprise approximately 40 percent of the states' total revenues. The rest comes from non-tax sources, such as intergovernmental aid (e.g., federal funds), lottery revenues and fees. The primary types of taxes levied by state governments include personal income tax, general sales tax, excise (or special sales) taxes and corporate income tax.[4]

    HIGHLIGHTS
  • According to the United States Census Bureau, Georgia collected $21.45 billion in tax revenue in 2016. The state's tax revenue per capita was $2,081.
  • Civil Liberties Policy

    Civil Liberties Policy Logo.png

    Affirmative action

    Affirmative action in Georgia refers to the steps taken by employers and universities inGeorgia to increase the proportions of historically disadvantaged minority groups at those institutions. Historically, affirmative action nationwide has taken many different forms, such asstrict quotas, extra outreach efforts, and racial and gender preferences. However, racial quotas in university admissions were banned in a 1978United States Supreme Court case,Regents of the University of California v. Bakke.[5]

    On June 29, 2023, theSupreme Court reversed lower court decisions inStudents for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College andStudents for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina, effectively ending the use of affirmative action in college admissions.

    As of March 2015, 109 out of 577 public four-year universities across the country reported that they considered race in admissions. This practice has been banned in eight states. Meanwhile, 28 states require affirmative action plans in either public employment or apprenticeships. Affirmative action programs that grant racial preferences have come under scrutiny in the courts for potentially violating the Equal Protection Clause of theFourteenth Amendment andTitle VII of the Civil Rights Act.[6][7]

    The following information details the use of affirmative action in universities and employment in Georgia, as well as notablecourt cases originating in the state.

    HIGHLIGHTS
  • In Georgia, three public universities reported considering race inadmissions as of March 2015. At that time there was no state law regarding affirmative action requirements foremployers.
  • The effects of affirmative action policies are contested. Proponents argue that affirmative action diversifies selective institutions and provides more opportunities to minorities. Opponents argue that implementing policies that favor some groups requires discrimination against others and that these policiesmay harm individuals they are meant to help.

    Campaign finance

    Campaign finance requirements govern how much money candidates and campaigns may receive from individuals and organizations, how they must report those contributions, and how much individuals, organizations, and political parties may contribute to campaigns. In addition to direct campaign contributions, campaign finance laws also apply to third-party organizations andnonprofit organizations that seek to influence elections throughindependent expenditures orissue advocacy.

    This page providesbackground on campaign finance regulation, listscontribution limits to state candidates and ballot measures inGeorgia,compares contribution limits to gubernatorial and state legislative candidates in Georgia with those from other states, and details thecandidate reporting requirements in Georgia.

    The information on this page pertains to candidates for state office and state ballot measures. Candidates for federal office are subject to federal campaign finance law. Candidates for local office are subject to all applicable state laws as well as any separate local campaign finance regulations.[8]

    As of July 2025:
  • Individuals could contribute $8,400 per election cycle to gubernatorial candidates and $3,300 per election cycle to state legislative candidates.
  • State parties could contribute $8,400 per election cycle togubernatorial candidates, $3,300 per election cycle tostate senate candidates, and $3,300 per election cycle tostate house candidates.
  • Political committees could contribute $8,400 per election cycle to gubernatorial candidates and $3,300 per election cycle to state legislative candidates.
  • Corporations and unions could contribute $8,400 per election cycle to gubernatorial candidates and $3,300 per election cycle to state legislative candidates.
  • Background

    Seal of the United StatesFederal Election Commission

    TheFederal Election Commission (FEC) is the independent regulatory agency that administers and enforces federal campaign election laws. The FEC is responsible for disclosing campaign finance information, enforcing limits and prohibitions on contributions and overseeing public funding of presidential elections.[9] According to the FEC, an individual becomes a federal candidate and must begin reporting campaign finances once he or she has either raised or spent $5,000 in his or her campaign. Within fifteen days of this benchmark, the candidate must register with the FEC and designate an official campaign committee, which is responsible for the funds and expenditures of the campaign. This committee must have an official treasurer and cannot support any candidate but the one who registered it. Detailed financial reports are then made to the FEC every financial quarter after the individual is registered. Reports are also made before primaries and before the general election.[10]

    The rules governing federal election campaigns and contributions have evolved over the past generation as result of a number of Supreme Court decisions. In the 2010Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission decision, the court held that corporate funding of independent political broadcasts in candidate elections cannot be limited. The court's decision also overturned the ban on for-profit and not-for-profit corporations and unions broadcasting electioneering communications in the 30 days before a presidential primary and in the 60 days before a general election.[11] In theSpeechNOW.org v. Federal Election Commission decision, the first application of theCitizens United decision, the court held that contribution limits on what individuals could give to independent expenditure-only groups, and the amount these organizations could receive, were unconstitutional. Contribution limits on donations directly to candidates, however, remained unchanged.[12][13] In 2014'sMcCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission decision, the court overturned biennial aggregate campaign contribution limits, and held that individuals may contribute to as many federal candidates as they want, but may only contribute up to the federal limit in each case.[14]

    While the FEC governs federal election campaigns and contribution limits, individual states require their own level of regulation and reporting. The amount of regulation required differs by state, as do the limits on campaign contributions and third-party activities to influence elections. Candidates for local office must follow any applicable state and local campaign finance regulations.

    Contribution limits

    The table below details contribution limits as they applied to various types of individuals and groups in Georgia as of July 2025. The uppermost row of the table indicates the contributor, while the leftmost column indicates the recipient.[15]

    Georgia contribution limits as of July 2025
     IndividualsPolitical Committee (PAC)Political partySuper PACsCorporationsUnions
    Statewide candidate (e.g.,governor)$8,400$8,400$8,400$0$8,400$8,400
    Senate candidate$3,300$3,300$3,300$0$3,300$3,300
    House candidate$3,300$3,300$3,300$0$3,300$3,300
    PACUnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimited$0UnlimitedUnlimited
    Party committeesUnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimited$0UnlimitedUnlimited
    Ballot measuresUnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimited$0UnlimitedUnlimited
    Limits apply per election cycle.
    Source:State Ethics Commission, "Contribution Limits," accessed July 13, 2025

    State comparisons in the 2024 elections

    See also:State-by-state comparison of campaign finance requirements
    Individual contribution limits
    Party contribution limits
    Political committee contribution limits
    Corporation and union contribution limits

    As of the 2024 elections, 38 states, including Georgia, had varying limits on individual contributions to gubernatorial or state legislative candidates. There were no limits in the remaining 12 states.


    Georgia

    Individual contribution limits in Georgia:

    • Governor: $8,400 per election
    • State Senate: $3,300 per election
    • State House: $3,300 per election
    Comparison to other states

    In the 38 states with individual contribution limits:

    • Governor
    • State Senate
      • Minimum: $200 per election (Colorado)
      • Maximum: $15,499.69 per election (Ohio)
    • State House
      • Minimum: $200 per election (Colorado)
      • Maximum: $15,499.69 per election (Ohio)

    Candidate reporting requirements

    Seal of Georgia

    DocumentIcon.jpgSee statutes:Title 21, Chapter 5 of the Georgia Code

    A candidate seeking state office inGeorgia must file with the State Ethics Commission. The process of registering and reporting with the commission is outlined below. A candidate seeking federal office must file with theFederal Election Commission. Reporting details for federal candidates are not included in this section.

    Getting started

    InGeorgia, campaign finance reporting can be completed onlinehere.

    To begin the campaign finance reporting process, a candidate must electronically file a Declaration of Intention to Accept Campaign Contributions (Form DOI) with the commission. This form must be filed before any contributions may be accepted.[17][18]

    The candidate may choose to form a campaign committee to accept contributions and make expenditures on his or behalf. To do this, he or she must file a Registration Form for a Campaign Committee (Form RC) with the commission. The name and address of the committee, its chairperson, treasurer and candidate must be registered with the commission before the committee can accept any contributions. One person may serve as both treasurer and chairperson, but if there is a vacancy in either position, no contributions may be accepted until the vacancy is filled. A candidate may have only one committee at a time.[17][18]

    Reporting requirements

    The candidate must use a bank account separate from his or her personal accounts for any campaign finance transaction. Reporting must begin when one of the following occurs:[19]

    • The candidate files a Declaration of Intention to Accept Campaign Contributions.
    • The candidate or candidate’s committee accepts a contribution.
    • The candidate or candidate’s committee makes an expenditure.

    Candidates are required to file the following reports:[20]

    • Personal Financial Disclosure Statement
      • All candidates and public officers running in an election must file a Personal Financial Disclosure Statement covering the previous calendar year. Only one of these forms is due per year. See the table below for information on when this form must be filed.
    Personal Financial Disclosure Statement filing
    Type of candidateWhen to file
    Current officeholderBetween January 1 and July 1 of each year
    Candidate for statewide officeNo later than 7 days after qualifying
    Candidate for office other than statewide officeNo later than 15 days after qualifying
    • Campaign Contribution Disclosure Statement (Form CCDR)
      • This form reports all expenditures and contributions. All contributions and expenditures greater than $100 must be itemized, as well as any aggregate totals of all contributions and expenditures of $100 or less.[21]
      • During an election year, this form must be filed six times. During a non-election year it is required only twice. In the case of run-off elections or special elections, extra reports must be filed.[19]
      • If a candidate has no opposition in a primary or general election and receives less than $100 in contributions, only the first and last reports need to be filed.[19]
      • There is a five business day grace period for filing these reports before any late fees are charged.[19]
      • If a candidate is unsuccessful in an election, he or she must still file reports for the remainder of an election cycle. If an unsuccessful candidate retains unpaid debts from the campaign, a supplemental Form CCDR must be filed by December 31 each year the debt remains unpaid.[19]
    • Two Business Day Report (TBD Form)
      • This form must be filed to disclose contributions (including loans) of $1,000 or more that are accepted between the last required report and the date of any election in which the candidate is running.[19]
      • These contributions must be reported online within two business days of receiving the contribution. These contributions must be included on the next regularly scheduled report, as well.[19]
    • Termination Statement
      • A termination statement must be submitted with a final Campaign Contribution Disclosure Report. It must identify the person responsible for maintaining campaign records and must be filed within 10 days of the dissolution of a campaign.[19]

    Campaign finance legislation

    The table below displays bills related to campaign finance introduced during or carried over to Georgia's current legislative session.[22]

    Election and campaign ballot measures

    See also:Elections and campaigns on the ballot andList of Georgia ballot measures


    Contact information

    Election agencies

    Seal of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission
    See also:State election agencies

    Individuals seeking additional information about election administration in Georgia can contact the following local, state, and federal agencies.

    Georgia County Election Offices

    Click here for a list

    Georgia Secretary of State Elections Division

    2 MLK Jr. Drive
    Suite 802 Floyd West Tower
    Atlanta, Georgia 30334
    Phone: 404-656-2871
    Fax: 404-463-5231
    Email:https://sos.ga.gov/form/contact-us
    Website:https://sos.ga.gov/elections-division-georgia-secretary-states-office

    Georgia Government Transparency and Campaign Finance Commission

    200 Piedmont Avenue SE
    Suite 1416 West Tower
    Atlanta, Georgia 30334
    Phone: 404-463-1980
    Fax: 404-463-1988
    Email:gaethics@ethics.ga.gov
    Website:http://ethics.ga.gov/

    U.S. Election Assistance Commission

    633 3rd Street NW, Suite 200
    Washington, DC 20001
    Phone: 301-563-3919
    Toll free: 1-866-747-1471
    Email:clearinghouse@eac.gov
    Website:https://www.eac.gov

    Federal Election Commission (FEC)

    1050 First Street, NE
    Washington, DC 20463
    Telephone: (202)-694-1100
    Toll-free: 1-800-424-9530
    Email:info@fec.gov
    Website:http://www.fec.gov/

    Recent news

    The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the termsGeorgia campaign finance. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

    See also

    Footnotes

    1. National Association of State Budget Officers, "State Expenditure Report (Fiscal 2014-2016)," accessed June 26, 2017
    2. Constitution of the State of Georgia, "Article VII," accessed October 17, 2014
    3. Tax Policy Center, "State Tax Collection Shares by Type 2000-2013," June 20, 2014
    4. Brunori, D. (2011).State Tax Policy: A Political Perspective. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute Press
    5. Oyez, "Regents of the University of California v. Bakke," accessed February 11, 2015
    6. Miller Center of Public Affairs, "Affirmative Action: Race or Class?" accessed February 10, 2015
    7. Business and Legal Resources, "Affirmative Action," accessed March 31, 2015
    8. National Conference of State Legislatures, "Campaign Finance Enforcement," accessed May 28, 2025
    9. Federal Election Commission, "About the FEC," accessed June 27, 2012
    10. Federal Election Commission, "Candidate Registration Brochure," accessed December 7, 2012
    11. New York Times, "Justices, 5-4, Reject Corporate Spending Limit," January 21, 2010
    12. Federal Election Commission, "Speechnow.org v. FEC," April 7, 2014
    13. OpenSecrets, "Two Federal Court Rulings Could Change Campaign Finance Landscape," March 26, 2010
    14. Federal Election Commission, "Ongoing Litigation," accessed March 18, 2015
    15. Vox, "Super PACs can spend unlimited amounts on elections, but must disclose their donors," accessed May 21, 2015
    16. National Conference of State Legislatures, "State Limits on Contributions to Candidates 2023-2024 Election Cycle," accessed May 8, 2025
    17. 17.017.1State Ethics Commission, "Candidate Information: State Level," accessed July 13, 2025
    18. 18.018.1State Ethics Commission, "Candidate Information: Statewide," accessed July 13, 2025
    19. 19.019.119.219.319.419.519.619.7Justia, "Georgia Code § 21-5-34 (2024)," accessed July 13, 2025
    20. Justia, "Georgia Code § 21-5-50," accessed July 13, 2025
    21. Justia, "Georgia Code § 21-5-3," accessed July 13, 2025
    22. Bills are organized by most recent action. Clicking on a bill will open its page onBallotpedia's Election Administration Legislation Tracker, which includes bill details and a summary.


    Ballotpedia
    Editorial Content
    Josh Altic, Director of ContentDaniel Anderson, Associate Director of Elections & DataCory Eucalitto, Associate Director of FeaturesRyan Byrne, Managing Editor of Ballot MeasuresMandy McConnell, Managing Editor of NewsDoug Kronaizl, Managing Editor of Local ExpansionAbbey Smith, Managing Editor of ElectionsJanie Valentine, Managing Editor of LawJoel Williams, Managing Editor of EventsJoseph Greaney, Managing Editor of PolicyAndrew BahlJaclyn BeranMarielle BrickerJoseph BrusgardEmma BurlingameKelly CoyleJon DunnVictoria EdwardsThomas EllisNicole FisherThomas GrobbenBrianna HoseaMolly KehoeTyler KingGlorie MartinezNorm Leahy, Senior EditorNathan MaxwellJimmy McAllisterBrandon McCauleyAndrew McNairEllie MikusMackenzie MurphyKaley PlatekSamantha PostAdam PowellAnnelise ReinwaldSpencer RichardsonVictoria RoseBriana RyanMyj SaintylMaddy SaluckaEmma SoukupAlexis ThackerMina VogelSamuel WonacottTrenton Woodcox
    Flag of Georgia
    v  e
    State ofGeorgia
    Atlanta (capital)
    Elections

    What's on my ballot? |Elections in 2026 |How to vote |How to run for office |Ballot measures

    Government

    Who represents me? |U.S. President |U.S. Congress |Federal courts |State executives |State legislature |State and local courts |Counties |Cities |School districts |Public policy

    Nonprofit regulation

    Nonprofit regulation in Georgia involves a complex set of rules that governnonprofit organizations and charitable giving throughout the state. Major issues surrounding nonprofit regulation nationwide include the following:

    • contribution limits,
    • donor disclosure, and
    • the redefinition ofissue advocacy.


    Georgia is one of39 states that require charitable organizations, and those intending to solicit on their behalf,to register with the state in order to solicit contributions, whether they are a Georgia organization or based out-of-state. In Georgia a number of groups and organizations are exempt from registration.[1]

    Georgia is one of32 states that allows registrants to use either theUnified Registration Statement (URS) or the state registration form.[2] Only seven states requiring registration do not accept the URS.

    According to Guidestar, an organization that reports on nonprofit companies, regulation of nonprofit activity protects donors and organizations from potential fraud and helps "to maintain trust in the [nonprofit] sector." According to the London School of Economics, nonprofit disclosure requirements can create privacy concerns among potential donors, thereby having an unintended negative impact on donor participation.[3][4]

    Education Policy

    Charter schools  •  Higher education  •  Public education  •  School choice 

    Education Policy Logo.png

    K-12 Public education

    TheGeorgia public school system (prekindergarten through grade 12) operates within districts governed by locally elected school boards and superintendents. In 2022, Georgia had 1,735,585 students enrolled in a total of 2,238 schools in 180 school districts. There were 115,647 teachers in the public schools, or roughly one teacher for every 15 students, compared to the national average of 1:16. In 2020, Georgia spent on average $11,707 per pupil.[5] The state's graduation rate was 82 percent in the 2018-2019 school year.[6]

    Higher education

    Georgia's higher education system is composed of 128 colleges and universities. Of these, 53 are public institutions, 36 are nonprofit private schools, and 39 are for-profit private institutions.[7]

    HIGHLIGHTS
  • Average ublic university tuition in Georgia increased 88 percent between 2005-2006 and 2015-2016, over four times the rate of inflation.
  • In Georgia, the total number of college faculty rose from 10,251 to 25,268 between the 1993-1994 and 2013-2014 school years.
  • The percentage of all part-time faculty, including graduate assistants, increased from 37 percent to 56.1 percent between the 1993-1994 and 2013-2014 school years.
  • School choice

    School choice is a term that refers to programs offering alternatives to assigned local public school options. Public school choice options include open enrollment policies,magnet schools, andcharter schools. Other options includeschool vouchers, scholarship tax credits, and education savings accounts (ESAs).[8][9]

    HIGHLIGHTS
  • According to the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools, a charter school advocacy group, there were an estimated 115 total charter schools in Georgia in the 2015-2016 school year. These schools enrolled approximately 82,800 students.
  • In Georgia, there were 150,360 students enrolled in 740 private schools in fall 2013, accounting for roughly 8.25 percent of the state's total school-age population.
  • Georgia enforces mandatory intra-district and voluntary inter-district open enrollment policies.
  • Proponents argue that school choice programs improve educational outcomes by expanding opportunity and access for historically disadvantaged students. In addition, advocates claim that school choice programs empower parents and improve traditional public schools through competition. Critics contend that these programs divert funds from traditional public schools, thereby generating unequal outcomes for students. In addition, some critics argue that school voucher programs wrongly direct tax dollars to religious organizations, which operate many private schools.

    Charter schools

    Charter schools in Georgia are public schools operated independently of public school systems. Although they are largely publicly funded, charter schools are exempt from many of the requirements imposed by state and local boards of education regarding hiring and curriculum. As public schools, charter schools cannot charge tuition or impose special entrance requirements; students are usually admitted through a lottery process if demand exceeds the number of spaces available in a school. Charter schools generally receive a percentage of the per-pupil funds from the state and local school districts for operational costs based on enrollment. In most states, charter schools do not receive funds for facilities or start-up costs; therefore, they must rely to some extent on private donations. The federal government also provides revenues through special grants. As of March 2017, 44 states and the District of Columbia had approved legislation authorizing the creation of public charter schools. Six states had not.

    HIGHLIGHTS
  • According to the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools, a charter school advocacy group, there were an estimated 115 total charter schools in Georgia in the 2015-2016 school year. These schools enrolled approximately 82,800 students.
  • Overall, charter school students accounted for 4.79 percent of total public school enrollment in Georgia in 2015.
  • TheGeorgia State Legislature approved the state's charter school law in 1994.
  • Election Policy

    Election Policy Logo.png

    Ballot access requirements

    In order to get on the ballot in Georgia, a candidate for state or federal office must meet a variety of state-specific filing requirements and deadlines.These regulations, known as ballot access laws, determine whether a candidate or party will appear on an election ballot. These laws are set at the state level. A candidate must prepare to meet ballot access requirements well in advance of primaries, caucuses, and the general election.

    There are three basic methods by which an individual may become a candidate for office in a state.

    1. An individual can seek the nomination of a state-recognized political party.
    2. An individual can run as an independent. Independent candidates often must petition in order to have their names printed on the general election ballot.
    3. An individual can run as a write-in candidate.

    This article outlines the steps that prospective candidates for state-level and congressional office must take in order to run for office in Georgia. For information about filing requirements for presidential candidates,click here. Information about filing requirements for local-level offices is not available in this article (contactstate election agencies for information about local candidate filing processes).

    Redistricting

    Redistricting is the process by which new congressional and state legislative district boundaries are drawn. Each of Georgia's 14 United States Representatives and 236 state legislators are elected from political divisions called districts. United States Senators are not elected by districts, but by the states at large. District lines are redrawn every 10 years following completion of the United States census. The federal government stipulates that districts must have nearly equal populations and must not discriminate on the basis of race or ethnicity.[10][11][12][13]

    Georgia was apportioned 14 seats in theU.S. House of Representatives after the 2020 census, the same number it received after the 2010 census. Click here for more information aboutredistricting in Georgia after the 2020 census.

    HIGHLIGHTS
  • Following the 2020 United States Census, Georgia was apportioned 14 congressional districts, which was unchanged from the number it had after the 2010 census.
  • Georgia's House of Representatives is made up of 180 districts; Georgia's State Senate is made up of 56 districts.
  • In Georgia, both congressional and state legislative district lines are drawn by the state legislature.
  • Voting



    Election Policy VNT Logo.png

    Election Information
    2026 election and voting dates
    Voter registration
    Early voting
    Absentee/mail-in voting
    All-mail voting
    Voter ID laws
    State poll opening and closing times
    Time off work for voting

    Ballotpedia's Election Administration Legislation Tracker

    Select a state from the menu below to learn more about its voting policies.

    The policies governing voter participation are enacted and enforced primarily at the state level. These policies, which includevoter identification requirements,early voting provisions,online voter registration systems, and more, dictate the conditions under which people cast their ballots in their respective states.

    This article includes the following information about voting policies in Georgia:

    Click here for more information about election administration in the state, including voter list maintenance policies, provisional ballot rules, post-election auditing practices, and additional election policy context.

    For information on elections happening this year,click here.

    Do you have questions about your elections? Looking for information about your local election official? Clickhere to use U.S. Vote Foundation’s election official lookup tool.

    Energy Policy

    Energy Policy-Logo.png

    Energy information

    Energy policy involves governmental actions affecting the production, distribution, and consumption of energy in a state. Energy policies are enacted and enforced at the local, state, and federal levels and may change over time. These policies include legislation, regulation, taxes, incentives for energy production or use, standards for energy efficiency, and more. Stakeholders include citizens, politicians, environmental groups, industry groups, and think tanks. A variety of factors can affect the feasibility of federal and state-level energy policies, such as availablenatural resources, geography, and consumer needs.

    Fracking

    Read about Georgia's state energy profile »

    According to theU.S. Energy Information Administration, Georgia had nooil ornatural gas reserves as of May 2017; thus, no fracking occurred in the state.[14]

    Environmental Policy

    Environmental Policy Logo.png

    Environmental information

    Environmental policy aims to conserve natural resources by balancing environmental protection with economic growth, property rights, public health, and energy production. Federal, state, and local government entities develop and implement environmental policies through laws and regulations. This page features information about environmental policy inGeorgia.

    Environmental governance in Georgia

    • TheGeorgia House has twostanding committees onGame, Fish and Parks andNatural Resources and Environment. TheGeorgia Senate also has a standing committee onNatural Resources and the Environment.
    • TheGeorgia Department of Natural Resources (DNR) is responsible for managing the state's natural resources and environment. The department's stated mission is to "to sustain, enhance, protect and conserve Georgia's natural, historic and cultural resources for present and future generations, while recognizing the importance of promoting the development of commerce and industry that utilize sound environmental practices."[15]
    • TheGeorgia Environmental Protection Division (EDP) is responsible for the state's environmental quality and protection programs. The EDP's mission states that the division "protects and restores Georgia’s environment. We take the lead in ensuring clean air, water and land. With our partners, we pursue a sustainable environment that provides a foundation for a vibrant economy and healthy communities."[16]

    Environmental budget

    See also:Environmental spending in the 50 states

    The table below features annual budget information for the Georgia Department of Natural Resources from 2011 to 2023:

    Environmental and natural resources budget in Georgia, 2011-2023
    Fiscal yearTotal spending
    2023$332,853,327
    2022$297,692,446
    2021$300,410,492
    2020$337,979,257
    2019$330,962,382
    2018$271,766,613
    2017$314,567,275
    2016$285,699,004
    2015$248,600,677
    2014$253,693,099
    2013$253,466,059
    2012$262,272,094
    2011$267,917,859
    Source:Georgia Governor's Office of Planning and Budget

    Air

    Clean Air Act

    See also:Implementation of the Clean Air Act

    TheClean Air Act is a federal law aimed at maintaining air quality and reducing air pollution. The law requires states and private industries to meet national air pollution standards. Each state must implement an EPA-approved plan to reduceair pollutants from industrial facilities such as chemical plants and utilities. Over 47,000 facilities nationwide were regulated under the Clean Air Act as of February 2023.[17][18][19][20]

    The table below features information about the number of regulated facilities under the Clean Air Act in Georgia from 2014 to 2023:

    Regulated facilities under the Clean Air Act in Georgia, 2014-2023
    YearNumber of EPA-regulated facilitiesNumber of state-regulated facilitiesNumber of local-regulated facilitiesTotal regulated facilities
    20231172201723
    202227177401801
    202118177601794
    202013176901782
    20197179201799
    20185179801803
    20173180801811
    20161180001801
    20151176601767
    20142183101833
    Source:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "EPA/State Air Dashboard"

    Mercury and air toxics standards

    See also:Mercury and air toxics standards

    Citing its authority under theClean Air Act, theU.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 2011 issued a rule (commonly known as the MATS rule) limiting the amount of mercury and other toxic air pollutants emitted by power plants. Mercury and air toxics standards (MATS) target mercury and other hazardous pollutants from over 580coal andoil-fired power plants nationwide. The MATS rule was issued by theObama administration as part of its larger policy limiting emissions fromcoal-fired power plants.[21]

    The EPA later reconsidered the MATS rule and, in 2020, determined "that it is not 'appropriate and necessary' to regulate electric utility steam generating units under section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA)."[22]

    A 2021 proposed rulemaking from the EPA seeks to revoke the 2020 action and reinstate the MATS rule.[23]

    During the period that the MATS rule was in effect, Georgia had ## power plants subject to the mercury standards.[24]

    Ozone standards

    See also:Ground-level ozone standards

    Federalozone standards establish the acceptable amount of ground levelozone, commonly known as smog, which is formed when nitrogen oxide combines with other organic chemicals in the atmosphere. Automobiles, power plants, factories and manufacturing centers emit the nitrogen oxide necessary for ozone formation. In high concentrations, ozone is harmful to human health.[25][26]

    EPA in 2015 lowered the acceptable amount of ground-level ozone (smog) in the air. The standards went into effect in 2025. States would have between the years 2020 and 2037 to create and establish a plan to meet the standards, depending how much ozone forms in certain areas of a state.[27][28]

    Back to top↑

    Clean Power Plan

    See also:Clean Power Plan andclimate change

    The EPA in 2015 finalized a regulatory action known as theClean Power Plan aimed at mitigating what the agency views as potentially human-causedclimate change. The plan aims to reducecarbon dioxide (CO2) emissions fromcoal- andoil-fired power plants (fossil fuel-fired) andnatural gas-fired power plants by 32 percent from 2005 levels by 2030. Each state would have to meet goals based on the number of fossil fuel- and natural gas-fired plants in the state.[29][30][31]

    After several states challenged the plan in court, arguing in part that the plan exceeded the EPA's statutory authority, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit delayed the rule's implementation in June 2016. The Trump administration later moved to replace the Clean Power Plan with the Affordable Clean Energy rule. The D.C. Circuit vacated the Trump-era rule in January 2021, "giving the incoming Biden administration a clean slate for" drafting a new rule, according toBloomberg.[32][33]

    Carbon dioxide emissions

    The following table provides information about annual carbon dioxide emissions in Georgia from 2010 to 2020:[34]

    Carbon dioxide emissions in Georgia, 2010-2020 (in million metric tons of energy-related carbon dioxide)
    YearTotal carbon dioxide emissions
    2020116.6
    2019136.5
    2018141.9
    2017141.8
    2016144.5
    2015145.7
    2014148.1
    2013142.9
    2012141.6
    2011160.0
    2010175.2
    Source:U.S. Energy Information Administration

    Land

    Federal land policy

    See also:Federal land policy

    Federal land policy involves theconservation and management ofnatural resources on land owned by the federal government. Most federal land policies focus on conservation, recreation, oil and natural gas extraction, wildlife and forest management, and grazing.

    The federal government as of 2018 owned around 640 million total acres of land (about 28 percent) of the 2.27 billion acres of land in the United States. Four federal agencies (the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), the National Park Service (NPS), the Forest Service (FS) oversee public lands for conservation, recreation, wildlife protection,grazing,energy production, and other purposes. The Department of Defense also oversees federal lands used for military, training, and related purposes. The majority of federal land is located in Alaska and 11 coterminous Western states[35]

    Federal land ownership

    See also:Federal land ownership by state

    The table below features information about changes in federal land ownership in Georgia from 1990 to 2018:[35]

    Change in federal land ownership in Georgia, 1990-2018
    YearTotal federal land (in acres)Percentage of state land owned by the federal government
    20181,946,4925.2%
    20101,956,7205.2%
    20001,933,4645.2%
    19901,921,6745.2%
    Source:Congressional Research Service

    Federal land management by agency

    The following table features information about federal land management in Georgia by federal agency in 2018:[35]

    Federal agency land management in Georgia, 2018
    AgencyTotal federal land in state managed by agency (in acres)Percentage of total federal land in state
    Bureau of Land Management (BLM)00%
    Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS)488,6481.3%
    National Park Service (NPS)39,9350%
    Forest Service (FS)867,5802.3%
    Department of Defense (DoD)550,3291.5%
    Source:Congressional Research Service

    National parks

    TheU.S. National Park Service (NPS) as of February 2023 oversaw what the agency describes as 424 units (often referred to as parks) and more than 150 related areas within the National Park System. The agency assists in managing national historic areas, wild and scenic rivers, historic landmarks, and national trails. The National Park System contained more than 85 million acres as of February 2023, including national parks, historical parks and sites, national monuments, battlefields and military parks, recreation areas, seashores, and parkways. More than 297 million visitors attended sites in the National Park System in 2021. NPS employed around 20,000 permanent, temporary, and seasonal employees as of February 2023.[36][37][38]

    NPS operated 11 national parks in Georgia as of February 2023.[39]

    The following table features visitation statistics for national parks in Georgia from 2017 to 2021.[40]

    National Park Service visitation in Georgia, 2017-2021
    YearTotal recreation visits
    20216,335,804
    20206,706,170
    20198,206,285
    20187,519,835
    20177,394,337
    Source:U.S. National Park Service

    Payments in lieu of taxes

    See also:Payments in lieu of taxes

    TheU.S. Department of the Interior pays local governments each year to offset what they lose in property taxes due to non-taxable federal land within their borders, commonly known aspayments in lieu of taxes (PILT). PILT payments go toward fire and police departments, public schools, road construction, and other local services. PILT amounts are based on population and the amount of federal land in a county. From 1977 (when PILT payments began) to 2022, the Interior Department paid out around $10.8 billion to states, territories, andWashington, D.C. PILT payments can be used for any governmental purpose.[41][42]

    The following table features information about payments in lieu of taxes received by local governments in Georgia from 2017 to 2021.[43]

    Total payments in lieu of taxes, Georgia, 2017-2021
    YearTotal payments in lieu of taxes
    2022$3,190,380
    2021$3,062,800
    2020$2,955,224
    2019$2,818,370
    2018$3,388,005
    Source:U.S. National Park Service

    Oil and natural gas activity

    See also:Oil and natural gas extraction on federal land andBLM oil and gas leases by state

    The federal government leases its land to private individuals and companies for energy development, including drilling forcrude oil andnatural gas,solar energy, andgeothermal energy. Oil and natural gas drilling on federal lands in the United States is primarily overseen by theU.S. Bureau of Land Management. Private oil and natural gas companies apply for leases from the BLM to produce energy on federal land. About 26 million acres of federal land—12.8 million of which produced oil and gas in economic quantities—were leased to about 24,000 oil and gas developers operating 96,000 wells at the end of fiscal year 2018.[44]

    The following table features information about oil and natural gas activity on federal land in Georgia from 2017 to 2021:[45][46]

    Oil and natural gas activity on federal land in Georgia, 2017-2021
    YearOil production (in thousands of barrels)Natural gas production (in million cubic feet)Total leases in stateTotal leased acres in state
    20210000
    20200000
    20190000
    20180000
    20170000
    Source:U.S. National Park Service

    Water

    Clean Water Act

    See also:Implementation of the Clean Water Act

    TheClean Water Act is a federal law regulating pollutants discharged into allwaters of the United States, including lakes, rivers, streams, andwetlands. The federal government approves water quality and technology standards for major sources of water pollution, such as chemical plants, steel manufacturers, municipal facilities, and others. Each state must establish water quality standards for all bodies of water within its boundaries.[47]

    Under the Clean Water Act, it is unlawful to discharge any pollutant from any source into navigable waters without a federal permit. The permit specifies what limitations or conditions apply to a facility before the facility may discharge any pollutants. Federal permits may contain facility-specific requirements and limitations depending on the water source.[48]

    The following table provides information about the number of Georgia facilities subject to regulation under the Clean Water Act from 2014 to 2023:[49]

    Clean Water Act permits, Georgia, 2014-2023
    YearNumber of facilities
    202367,513
    202275,276
    202170,543
    202059,772
    201956,572
    201853,618
    201741,610
    201630,379
    201520,645
    201413,591
    Source:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "National Water Activity Dashboard"

    Waste

    Superfund sites and hazardous waste facilities

    See also:Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act

    Superfund is a federal program that addresses contaminated waste sites and their return to practical use. Superfund sites include oil refineries, smelting facilities, mines and other industrial areas. The federal government can compel the private entities responsible for a waste site to clean the site or face penalties. If the federal government cleans a waste site, it can compel the responsible company to reimburse the government for cleanup costs. Because Superfund sites are added and removed from a prioritized list on a regular basis, the total number of Superfund sites since the program's inception in 1980 is unknown.[50][51][52]

    The federalResource Conservation and Recovery Act covers hazardous wastes, including their generation, treatment, storage and disposal. States may regulate hazardous wastes rather than the federal government. The EPA is responsible for all hazardous waste requirements if no state program exists. Hazardous waste regulations cover waste generators, transporters, treatment centers, storage and disposal facilities.[53]

    Georgia had 17 Superfund sites and 4,893 regulated hazardous waste facilities as of February 2023.[54][55]

    Endangered species

    Endangered Species Act

    See also:Endangered species in Georgia

    TheEndangered Species Act is a federal law that mandates the listing and conservation ofendangered and threatened species. The legislation aims to prevent the extinction of vulnerable species throughout the United States and to recover a species' population to the point where listing the species as endangered or threatened is no longer necessary. TheU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is responsible for the law's implementation.[26][56]

    Georgia had 75 federally listed endangered or threatened plant or animal species as of February 2023. To view the full list,click here.[57]

    Environmental ballot measures in Georgia

    The following list features historical information aboutballot measures relating to environmental issues in Georgia.

    Natural resources

    Environment

    Water

    Back to top↑

    Recent environmental legislation in Georgia

    The following list features information about environmental bills that have been introduced in or passed by theGeorgia State Legislature in the last five years. To learn more about these bills, click the bill title. This information is provided byBillTrack50 andLegiScan.

    Note: Due to the nature of the sorting process used to generate this list, some results may not be relevant to the topic. If no bills are displayed below, no legislation pertaining to this topic has been introduced in the legislature recently.

    See also

    External links

    Footnotes

    1. Fishman, S. & Barrett, R. (2012).Nonprofit Fundraising Registration: The 50 State Guide. NOLO.
    2. "Multistate Filing Form," accessed December 17, 2014
    3. Guidestar, Fundraising: What Laws Apply?" accessed February 18, 2015
    4. London School of Economics, "Campaign finance laws that make small donations public may lead to fewer people contributing and to smaller donations," January 7, 2015
    5. United States Census Bureau, "U.S. School System Current Spending Per Pupil by Region: Fiscal Year 2020," May 18, 2022
    6. National Center for Education Statistics, "Fast Facts: High school graduation rates," accessed September 28, 2022
    7. National Center for Education Statistics, "College Navigator - Georgia," accessed July 12, 2016
    8. National Conference of State Legislatures, "School Choice and Charters," accessed June 18, 2014
    9. Friedman Foundation for School Choice, "What is School Choice?" accessed June 18, 2014
    10. All About Redistricting, "Why does it matter?" accessed April 8, 2015
    11. Indy Week, "Cracked, stacked and packed: Initial redistricting maps met with skepticism and dismay," June 29, 2011
    12. The Atlantic, "How the Voting Rights Act Hurts Democrats and Minorities," June 17, 2013
    13. Redrawing the Lines, "The Role of Section 2 - Majority Minority Districts," accessed April 6, 2015
    14. Cite error: Invalid<ref> tag; no text was provided for refs namedEIA
    15. Georgia Department of Natural Resources, "Mission," accessed December 15, 2014
    16. Georgia Environmental Protection Division, "Mission, Vision, and Guiding Principles," accessed December 15, 2014
    17. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Clean Air Act Requirements and History," accessed August 7, 2014
    18. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Understanding the Clean Air Act," accessed August 7, 2014
    19. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "History of the Clean Air Act," accessed August 7, 2014
    20. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Analyze Trends: EPA/State Air Dashboard," accessed February 9, 2023
    21. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Basic Information on Mercury and Air Toxics Standards," accessed January 5, 2015
    22. EPA, "Final Revised Supplemental Finding and Results of the Residual Risk and Technology Review," accessed February 2, 2023
    23. EPA, "Proposed Revocation of the 2020 Reconsideration and Affirmation of the Appropriate and Necessary Supplemental Finding," accessed February 2, 2023
    24. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Power Plants Likely Covered by the Toxics Rule," accessed January 19, 2016
    25. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Ground Level Ozone: Regulatory Actions," accessed February 2, 2016
    26. 26.026.1U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Overview of EPA's Proposal to Update the Air Quality Standards for Ground-Level Ozone," November 25, 2014Cite error: Invalid<ref> tag; name "overview" defined multiple times with different content
    27. Washington Examiner, "EPA tries to appease green groups mad about ozone rules," October 1, 2015
    28. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Ground Level Ozone by the numbers," accessed February 2, 2016
    29. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Overview of the Clean Power Plan," accessed November 3, 2015
    30. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Clean Power Plan Toolbox for States," accessed November 3, 2015
    31. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Clean Power Plan - Rule Summary," August 3, 2015
    32. The Hill, "Supreme Court climate fight shakes up Senate races," February 10, 2016
    33. Bloomberg, "EPA’s Industry-Friendly Climate Rule Struck Down by Court (3)," January 19, 2021
    34. U.S. Energy Information Administration, "Energy-Related CO2 Emission Data Tables," accessed February 3, 2023
    35. 35.035.135.2Congressional Research Service, "Federal Land Ownership: Overview and Data," December 29, 2014
    36. U.S. National Park Service, "About Us," accessed February 7, 2023
    37. National Park Service, "Visitation Numbers," accessed February 7, 2023
    38. National Park Service, "Organizational Structure of the National Park Service," accessed February 7, 2023
    39. National Park Service, "Georgia," accessed February 7, 2023
    40. U.S. National Park Service, "Visitation By State and By Park (2017 - Last Calendar Year)," accessed February 7, 2023
    41. U.S. Department of the Interior, "Payment in Lieu of Taxes," accessed February 1, 2023
    42. U.S. Department of the Interior, "Frequently Asked Questions," accessed February 8, 2016
    43. U.S. National Park Service, "Payment in Lieu of Taxes," accessed February 7, 2023
    44. Bureau of Land Management, "About the BLM Oil and Gas Program," accessed February 7, 2023
    45. U.S. Department of the Interior, "Natural Resources Revenue Data," accessed February 7, 2023
    46. Bureau of Land Management, "Oil and Gas Statistics," accessed February 7, 2023
    47. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Summary of the Clean Water Act,” accessed January 29, 2014
    48. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "NPDES Home," accessed September 23, 2014
    49. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Analyze Trends: EPA/State Wastewater Dashboard," accessed February 9, 2023
    50. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Superfund Glossary, S," accessed December 1, 2014
    51. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Superfund Glossary, N," accessed November 25, 2014
    52. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Introduction to the Hazard Ranking System (HRS)," accessed February 17, 2015
    53. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)," accessed August 11, 2014
    54. Environmental Protection Agency, "National Priorities List (NPL) Sites - by State," accessed February 9, 2023
    55. Environmental Protection Agency, "Analyze Trends: EPA/State Hazardous Waste Dashboard," accessed February 9, 2023
    56. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, "ESA Overview," accessed October 1, 2014
    57. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, "Listed species believed to or known to occur in each State," accessed February 9, 2023

    [[Category:Environmental policy information by state

    Ballotpedia
    Editorial Content
    Josh Altic, Director of ContentDaniel Anderson, Associate Director of Elections & DataCory Eucalitto, Associate Director of FeaturesRyan Byrne, Managing Editor of Ballot MeasuresMandy McConnell, Managing Editor of NewsDoug Kronaizl, Managing Editor of Local ExpansionAbbey Smith, Managing Editor of ElectionsJanie Valentine, Managing Editor of LawJoel Williams, Managing Editor of EventsJoseph Greaney, Managing Editor of PolicyAndrew BahlJaclyn BeranMarielle BrickerJoseph BrusgardEmma BurlingameKelly CoyleJon DunnVictoria EdwardsThomas EllisNicole FisherThomas GrobbenBrianna HoseaMolly KehoeTyler KingGlorie MartinezNorm Leahy, Senior EditorNathan MaxwellJimmy McAllisterBrandon McCauleyAndrew McNairEllie MikusMackenzie MurphyKaley PlatekSamantha PostAdam PowellAnnelise ReinwaldSpencer RichardsonVictoria RoseBriana RyanMyj SaintylMaddy SaluckaEmma SoukupAlexis ThackerMina VogelSamuel WonacottTrenton Woodcox
    v  e
    Environmental Policy
    BackgroundEnvironmental Policy Project
    Energy and environmental news
    Environmental terms
    Air pollutantsAir Quality IndexBLM grazing permitCarbon dioxideCarbon footprintClean Air ActClean Water ActClimate change • ConservAmerica •Cross State Air Pollution RuleDeep ecologyEcologyEndangered speciesImplementation of the Endangered Species ActEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental healthEnvironmental restorationEnvironmental scienceFederal landFrackingGreenhouse effectGreenhouse gasGround-level ozone standardsGround waterHazardous air pollutantIntergovernmental Panel on Climate ChangeKeystone XLMercury and air toxics standardsMunicipal solid wasteNational Ambient Air Quality StandardsNational Pollutant Discharge Elimination SystemNational Priorities List of Superfund sites • National Wildlife Federation •Natural resourcesNonpoint source of water pollutionOilOzonePesticidePetroleumPoint source of water pollutionPublic water systemRadioactive wasteRenewable energy resourcesRenewable Portfolio StandardsSolar energyState parkSuperfundTraditional energy resourcesU.S. Bureau of Land ManagementU.S. Environmental Protection Agency • •U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceU.S. Forest ServiceU.S. Geological SurveyWastewater treatmentWater quality criteriaWetlandWilderness ActWilderness SocietyWind energy
    Endangered species terms
    Environmental policy by state
    Endangered species policy
    Endangered species policy by state
    Environmental statistics
    Endangered species statistics
    Ballotpedia
    Editorial Content
    Josh Altic, Director of ContentDaniel Anderson, Associate Director of Elections & DataCory Eucalitto, Associate Director of FeaturesRyan Byrne, Managing Editor of Ballot MeasuresMandy McConnell, Managing Editor of NewsDoug Kronaizl, Managing Editor of Local ExpansionAbbey Smith, Managing Editor of ElectionsJanie Valentine, Managing Editor of LawJoel Williams, Managing Editor of EventsJoseph Greaney, Managing Editor of PolicyAndrew BahlJaclyn BeranMarielle BrickerJoseph BrusgardEmma BurlingameKelly CoyleJon DunnVictoria EdwardsThomas EllisNicole FisherThomas GrobbenBrianna HoseaMolly KehoeTyler KingGlorie MartinezNorm Leahy, Senior EditorNathan MaxwellJimmy McAllisterBrandon McCauleyAndrew McNairEllie MikusMackenzie MurphyKaley PlatekSamantha PostAdam PowellAnnelise ReinwaldSpencer RichardsonVictoria RoseBriana RyanMyj SaintylMaddy SaluckaEmma SoukupAlexis ThackerMina VogelSamuel WonacottTrenton Woodcox

    Endangered species

    Endangered species policy in Georgia involves the identification and protection ofendangered and threatened animal and plant species. Policies are implemented and enforced by both the state and federal governments.

    HIGHLIGHTS
  • As of July 2016, Georgia had 69 species—47 endangered species and 22 threatened species—listed under the federalEndangered Species Act (ESA).
  • Of these, 42 were animal species and 27 were plant species.
  • Finance Policy

    Policypedia Finance Final.png

    Financial regulation information

    The United States financial system is a network that facilitates exchanges between lenders and borrowers. The system, which includes banks and investment firms, is the base for all economic activity in the nation. According to theFederal Reserve, financial regulation has two main intended purposes: to ensure the safety and soundness of the financial system and to provide and enforce rules that aim to protect consumers. The regulatory framework varies across industries, with different regulations applying to different financial services.[1]

    Individual federal and state entities have different and sometimes overlapping responsibilities within the regulatory system. For example, individual states and three federal agencies—the Federal Reserve, the Office of Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), and theFederal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)—regulate commercial banks. Other sectors of the financial market are regulated by specific entities.[2][3]

    HIGHLIGHTS
  • In 2015, there were a total of 183 distinct commercial banks in Georgia, with total deposits of $213.28 billion.
  • In Georgia, the Department of Banking and Finance is responsible for regulating banks, credit unions, and trust companies.
  • In 2015, a total of 61,924 financial crimes were reported in Georgia according to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FINCEN), an agency of the United States Department of Treasury.
  • Some, such as theBrookings Institution, argue that expanded governmental regulation of banks and financial products (e.g., mortgages) can prevent large-scale financial crises, protect consumers from abusive practices, and stabilize financial markets. Others, such as theCato Institute, argue that over-regulation of banks of banks and financial products burdens business, stalls economic growth, and does little, if anything, to stabilize financial markets. Beyond this basic debate about the role of the government in regulating the private financial sector, there are varying opinions about the proper extent of governmental regulation.[4][5]

    Healthcare Policy

    Healthcare Policy Logo.png

    Healthcare information

    Healthcare policy in Georgia involves thecreation and implementation of laws, rules, and regulations for managing the state's healthcare system. The healthcare system consists of services provided by medical professionals to diagnose, treat, and prevent mental and physical illness and injury. The system also encompasses a wide range of related sectors, such asinsurance,pharmaceuticals andhealth information technology.

    According to theNational Conference of State Legislatures, the 50 state legislatures collectively "make thousands of health policy decisions each year," not including the decisions made by local governments, which often oversee hospitals, and private bodies, such as insurers. These decisions can include budget appropriations, requirements for doctors obtaining their licenses, which services are covered by insurance, how personal health information is managed, and which immunizations children must receive, among many others.[6]

    Healthcare policy affects not only the cost citizens must pay for care, but also their access to care and the quality of care received, which can influence their overall health. A top concern for policymakers is therising cost of healthcare, which has placed an increasing strain on the disposable income of consumers as well as onstate budgets.

    Other issues in healthcare policy include

    Medicaid spending

    Georgia'sMedicaid program provides medical insurance to groups of low-income people and individuals with disabilities. Medicaid is a nationwide program jointly funded by the federal government and the states. Medicaid eligibility, benefits, and administration are managed by the states within federal guidelines. A program related to Medicaid is theChildren's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), which covers low-income children above the poverty line and is sometimes operated in conjunction with a state's Medicaid program. Medicaid is a separate program fromMedicare, which provides health coverage for the elderly.

    Effect of the Affordable Care Act

    Theimpact of theAffordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA), also known as Obamacare, has been debated among politicians, policymakers, and other stakeholders. The ACA was signed into law in 2010 by PresidentBarack Obama (D). The law facilitated the purchase of health insurance through a system ofhealth insurance exchanges, tax credits, and subsidies. Initially, states were required to expand eligibility for Medicaid under the law; a 2012 ruling by the United States Supreme Court made the Medicaid expansion voluntary for states. The law also required insurers to cover healthcare services within a standard set of benefits and prohibited coverage denials based on preexisting conditions. Under the law, all individuals were required to obtain healthinsurance.

    HIGHLIGHTS
  • Between 2013 and 2016, the number of uninsured individuals in Georgia declined by 29%.
  • About 400,000 individuals in Georgia were enrolled in health plans offered through the health insurance exchange in 2017. Enrollment in Medicaid amounted to about 1.8 million in May 2017.
  • TheKaiser Family Foundation found that between 2016 and 2017, average monthly premiums forbenchmark plans on Georgia's exchange increased by an average of 13% in the Atlanta market, from $254 to $286.

  • Immigration Policy

    Policypedia Imigration Final.png

    Immigration information

    Immigration policy determines who may become a new citizen of the United States or enter the country as a temporary worker, student, refugee, or permanent resident. The federal government is responsible for setting and enforcing most immigration policy.

    Meanwhile, states assume a largely supportive role, enacting their own supplementary laws and setting policies that may, for example, determine which public services immigrants can access, establish employee screening requirements, or guide the interaction between related state agencies and their federal counterparts.

    Some jurisdictions, including some states, cities, and counties, have adopted policies of not cooperating with federal immigration enforcement; these jurisdictions have become known assanctuary jurisdictions.

    HIGHLIGHTS
  • As of October 2016, Georgia did not allow lawfully residing immigrants to enroll inMedicaid or theChildren's Health Insurance Program. The state also did not allow individuals residing in the country without legal permission to access in-state tuition rates for public colleges and universities.
  • In 2014, Georgia's population amounted to 9.9 million. About 90.3 percent of Georgia residents were native-born citizens; 3.8 percent of residents were naturalized citizens and 6 percent were non-citizens.
  • Georgia's poverty rate during 2014 was 14.2 percent. Among native-born citizens, 13.3 percent lived below the poverty line, compared to 30.4 percent of non-citizens.
  • Pension Policy

    Pension Policy Logo.png

    Public pensions

    Georgiapublic pensions are the state mechanism by which state and many local government employees in Georgia receive retirement benefits.

    There were 67 public pension systems in Georgia as of 2020. Of these, 11 were state-level programs while the remaining 56 were administered at the local level. Membership in Georgia's various pension systems totaled 1,004,238, as of fiscal year 2020. Of these, 455,507 were active members.[7]

    HIGHLIGHTS
  • Total contributions of $5.3 billion were made to Georgia's state and local pension systems, in fiscal year 2020. Of this amount, $1.0 billion came from employees.
  • Georgia's state and local pension systems made payments totaling $10.0 billion, in fiscal year 2020.
  • Georgia's state and local pension systems held $118.4 billion in total cash and investment holdings, as of fiscal year 2020.

  • Public policy in other states

    Click your state for an overview of policy information in your state.
    http://ballotpedia.org/Public policy in STATE


    Footnotes

    Flag of Georgia
    v  e
    State ofGeorgia
    Atlanta (capital)
    Elections

    What's on my ballot? |Elections in 2026 |How to vote |How to run for office |Ballot measures

    Government

    Who represents me? |U.S. President |U.S. Congress |Federal courts |State executives |State legislature |State and local courts |Counties |Cities |School districts |Public policy

    Ballotpedia
    Editorial Content
    Josh Altic, Director of ContentDaniel Anderson, Associate Director of Elections & DataCory Eucalitto, Associate Director of FeaturesRyan Byrne, Managing Editor of Ballot MeasuresMandy McConnell, Managing Editor of NewsDoug Kronaizl, Managing Editor of Local ExpansionAbbey Smith, Managing Editor of ElectionsJanie Valentine, Managing Editor of LawJoel Williams, Managing Editor of EventsJoseph Greaney, Managing Editor of PolicyAndrew BahlJaclyn BeranMarielle BrickerJoseph BrusgardEmma BurlingameKelly CoyleJon DunnVictoria EdwardsThomas EllisNicole FisherThomas GrobbenBrianna HoseaMolly KehoeTyler KingGlorie MartinezNorm Leahy, Senior EditorNathan MaxwellJimmy McAllisterBrandon McCauleyAndrew McNairEllie MikusMackenzie MurphyKaley PlatekSamantha PostAdam PowellAnnelise ReinwaldSpencer RichardsonVictoria RoseBriana RyanMyj SaintylMaddy SaluckaEmma SoukupAlexis ThackerMina VogelSamuel WonacottTrenton Woodcox