Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot.Click to learn more!

Presidential Executive Order 13772 (Donald Trump, 2017)

From Ballotpedia
Administrative State
Administrative State Icon Gold.png
Five Pillars of the Administrative State
Judicial deference
Nondelegation
Executive control
Procedural rights
Agency dynamics

Click here for more coverage of theadministrative state on Ballotpedia


Executive Order 13772: Core Principles for Regulating the United States Financial System was a presidentialexecutive order issued byPresidentDonald Trump (R) in 2017 that put forth a set of standards, or core principles, to guide regulatory actions that impact the financial industry. The core principles aimed to foster economic growth, advance the domestic and international competitiveness of American companies, and streamline financial regulations, among other priorities. The order also directed the secretary of theU.S. Department of the Treasury to provide the president with periodic reports reviewing how the order's core principles were reflected in existing financial regulations, recommending regulatory improvements, and noting any actions taken to promote the core principles.[1]

PresidentJoe Biden (D) revoked E.O. 13772 on February 24, 2021, viaE.O. 14018.[2]

Background

During the 2016 presidential campaign, then-presidential candidateDonald Trump campaigned on a platform to eliminate what he called "job-killing regulations." He pledged to make repeal or reform of the 2010Dodd-Frank Act—legislation broadly aimed at protecting consumers from abusive financial services practices—and the law's resulting regulations a major goal of his transition. Prior to a meeting with his economic advisors on February 3, 2017, President Trump stated, “We expect to be cutting a lot out of Dodd-Frank. I have so many people, friends of mine, with nice businesses, they can’t borrow money, because the banks just won’t let them borrow because of the rules and regulations and Dodd-Frank.” Later that day, Trump issued Executive Order 13772, titled "Core Principles for Regulating the United States Financial System," geared toward examining, streamlining, and developing recommendations to improve federal regulations that impact the financial industry.[3][4]

Though E.O. 13772 did not specifically mention theDodd-Frank Act, the order's provisions targeted financial regulations that stemmed from the legislation.[5] The order put forth a set of guidelines, described ascore principles, that the Trump administration aimed to promote with respect to administrative regulations that impact the financial industry.Click here for a full list of the order's core principles.[1][5]

E.O. 13772 also required the secretary of theU.S. Department of the Treasury to periodically report to the president with a review of how the order's core principles were reflected in existing financial regulations, proposals for improvement, and descriptions of any actions taken to promote the core principles.[1]

Impact

Treasury SecretarySteve Mnuchin had issued three reports pursuant to E.O. 13772 as of April 2018. The reports included recommendations to streamline financial regulations through executive and legislative actions. The recommendations addressed regulations that impact "markets, liquidity, central clearing, financial products, asset management, insurance, and innovation," according to the first report.[6][7][8]

Provisions

Regulatory principles

The order put forth the following guidelines, or core principles, for regulatory actions concerning the financial industry:

(a) empower Americans to make independent financial decisions and informed choices in the marketplace, save for retirement, and build individual wealth;

(b) prevent taxpayer-funded bailouts;

(c) foster economic growth and vibrant financial markets through more rigorous regulatory impact analysis that addresses systemic risk and market failures, such as moral hazard and information asymmetry;

(d) enable American companies to be competitive with foreign firms in domestic and foreign markets;

(e) advance American interests in international financial regulatory negotiations and meetings;

(f) make regulation efficient, effective, and appropriately tailored; and

(g) restore public accountability within Federal financial regulatory agencies and rationalize the Federal financial regulatory framework.[1][9]

Reporting requirements

The order directed the secretary of theU.S. Department of the Treasury, in consultation with the heads of the agencies that make up theFinancial Stability Oversight Council, to periodically report to the president concerning "the extent to which existing laws, treaties, regulations, guidance, reporting and recordkeeping requirements, and other Government policies promote the Core Principles and what actions have been taken, and are currently being taken, to promote and support the Core Principles." The periodic reports were also required to include information about any laws or policies that inhibited the core principles.[1]

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.01.11.21.31.4WhiteHouse.gov, "Presidential Executive Order on Core Principles for Regulating the United States Financial System," February 3, 2017
  2. WhiteHouse.gov, "Executive Order on the Revocation of Certain Presidential Actions," February 24, 2021
  3. The Atlantic, "Trump Begins to Chip Away at Banking Regulations," February 3, 2017
  4. The New Republic, "How Democrats Are Helping Trump Dismantle Dodd-Frank," March 1, 2018
  5. 5.05.1The New York Times, "Trump Moves to Roll Back Obama-Era Financial Regulations," February 3, 2017
  6. U.S. Department of the Treasury, "Treasury Releases Second Report On The Administration’s Core Principles Of Financial Regulation," October 6, 2017
  7. U.S. Department of the Treasury, " Treasury Releases Third Report On The Administration’s Core Principles For Financial Regulation," October 26, 2017
  8. U.S. Department of the Treasury, " Treasury Releases First Report on Core Principles of Financial Regulation Stimulating Economic Growth, Increasing Access to Capital & Taxpayer Protection Are Top Priorities," June 12, 2017
  9. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
v  e
The Administrative State
MainThe Administrative State Project Badge.png
Pillars
Reporting
Laws
Administrative Procedure ActAntiquities ActCivil Service Reform ActClayton Antitrust ActCommunications Act of 1934Congressional Review ActElectronic Freedom of Information ActFederal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938Federal Housekeeping StatuteFederal Reserve ActFederal Trade Commission Act of 1914Freedom of Information ActGovernment in the Sunshine ActIndependent Offices Appropriations Act of 1952Information Quality ActInterstate Commerce ActNational Labor Relations ActPaperwork Reduction ActPendleton ActPrivacy Act of 1974Regulatory Flexibility ActREINS ActREINS Act (Wisconsin)Securities Act of 1933Securities Exchange Act of 1934Sherman Antitrust ActSmall Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness ActTruth in Regulating ActUnfunded Mandates Reform Act
Cases
Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerA.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesAssociation of Data Processing Service Organizations v. CampAuer v. RobbinsChevron v. Natural Resources Defense CouncilCitizens to Preserve Overton Park v. VolpeFederal Trade Commission (FTC) v. Standard Oil Company of CaliforniaField v. ClarkFood and Drug Administration v. Brown and Williamson Tobacco CorporationHumphrey's Executor v. United StatesImmigration and Naturalization Service (INS) v. ChadhaJ.W. Hampton Jr. & Company v. United StatesLucia v. SECMarshall v. Barlow'sMassachusetts v. Environmental Protection AgencyMistretta v. United StatesNational Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) v. SebeliusNational Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning CompanyNational Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSecurities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery CorporationSkidmore v. Swift & Co.United States v. LopezUnited States v. Western Pacific Railroad Co.Universal Camera Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardVermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense CouncilWayman v. SouthardWeyerhaeuser Company v. United States Fish and Wildlife ServiceWhitman v. American Trucking AssociationsWickard v. FilburnWiener v. United States
Terms
Adjudication (administrative state)Administrative judgeAdministrative lawAdministrative law judgeAdministrative stateArbitrary-or-capricious testAuer deferenceBarrier to entryBootleggers and BaptistsChevron deference (doctrine)Civil servantCivil serviceCode of Federal RegulationsCodify (administrative state)Comment periodCompliance costsCongressional RecordCoordination (administrative state)Deference (administrative state)Direct and indirect costs (administrative state)Enabling statuteEx parte communication (administrative state)Executive agencyFederal lawFederal RegisterFederalismFinal ruleFormal rulemakingFormalism (law)Functionalism (law)Guidance (administrative state)Hybrid rulemakingIncorporation by referenceIndependent federal agencyInformal rulemakingJoint resolution of disapproval (administrative state)Major ruleNegotiated rulemakingNondelegation doctrineOIRA prompt letterOrganic statutePragmatism (law)Precautionary principlePromulgateProposed rulePublication rulemakingRegulatory budgetRegulatory captureRegulatory dark matterRegulatory impact analysisRegulatory policy officerRegulatory reform officerRegulatory reviewRent seekingRetrospective regulatory reviewRisk assessment (administrative state)RulemakingSeparation of powersSignificant regulatory actionSkidmore deferenceStatutory authoritySubstantive law and procedural lawSue and settleSunset provisionUnified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory ActionsUnited States CodeUnited States Statutes at Large
Bibliography
Agencies
Ballotpedia
Editorial Content
Josh Altic, Director of ContentDaniel Anderson, Associate Director of Elections & DataCory Eucalitto, Associate Director of FeaturesRyan Byrne, Managing Editor of Ballot MeasuresMandy McConnell, Managing Editor of NewsDoug Kronaizl, Managing Editor of Local ExpansionAbbey Smith, Managing Editor of ElectionsJanie Valentine, Managing Editor of LawJoel Williams, Managing Editor of EventsJoseph Greaney, Managing Editor of PolicyAndrew BahlJaclyn BeranMarielle BrickerJoseph BrusgardEmma BurlingameKelly CoyleJon DunnVictoria EdwardsThomas EllisNicole FisherThomas GrobbenBrianna HoseaMolly KehoeTyler KingGlorie MartinezNorm Leahy, Senior EditorNathan MaxwellJimmy McAllisterBrandon McCauleyAndrew McNairEllie MikusMackenzie MurphyKaley PlatekSamantha PostAdam PowellAnnelise ReinwaldSpencer RichardsonVictoria RoseBriana RyanMyj SaintylMaddy SaluckaEmma SoukupAlexis ThackerMina VogelSamuel WonacottTrenton Woodcox