National Labor Relations Board

- The Administrative State
- Administrative State Index
- Ballotpedia's Five Pillars
- Educational opportunities related to the administrative state
- The Checks and Balances Newsletter
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- Tracking
- Terms and definitions
- Glossary of administrative state terms
- Deference
- Rulemaking
- Formal rulemaking
- Informal rulemaking
- Hybrid rulemaking
- Proposed rule
- Final rule
- Comment period
- Ex parte communications
- Judicial review
- Nondelegation doctrine
- Adjudication
- Administrative law judge
- Due process
- Federalism
- Guidance
- Executive agency
- Independent federal agency
- More terms and definitions
- Laws and statutes
- Executive orders
- Jimmy Carter
- Ronald Reagan
- Bill Clinton
- George W. Bush
- Barack Obama
- Donald Trump (first term)
- Presidential Executive Order 13765 (Donald Trump, 2017)
- Presidential Executive Order 13771 (Donald Trump, 2017)
- Presidential Executive Order 13772 (Donald Trump, 2017)
- Presidential Executive Order 13777 (Donald Trump, 2017)
- Presidential Executive Order 13781 (Donald Trump, 2017)
- Presidential Executive Order 13783 (Donald Trump, 2017)
- Presidential Executive Order 13789 (Donald Trump, 2017)
- Presidential Executive Order 13836 (Donald Trump, 2018)
- Presidential Executive Order 13837 (Donald Trump, 2018)
- Presidential Executive Order 13839 (Donald Trump, 2018)
- Presidential Executive Order 13843 (Donald Trump, 2018)
- Joseph Biden
- Donald Trump (second term)
- Executive Order: Exclusions From Federal Labor-Management Relations Programs (Donald Trump, 2025)
- Executive Order: Stopping Waste, Fraud, and Abuse by Eliminating Information Silos (Donald Trump, 2025)
- Executive Order: Eliminating Waste and Saving Taxpayer Dollars by Consolidating Procurement (Donald Trump, 2025)
- Executive Order: Continuing the Reduction of the Federal Bureaucracy (Donald Trump, 2025)
- Executive Order: Implementing the President's "Department of Government Efficiency" Cost Efficiency Initiative (Donald Trump, 2025)
- Executive Order: Ensuring Lawful Governance and Implementing the President's "Department of Government Efficiency" Deregulatory Initiative (Donald Trump, 2025)
- Executive Order: Commencing the Reduction of the Federal Bureaucracy (Donald Trump, 2025)
- Executive Order: Ensuring Accountability for All Agencies (Donald Trump, 2025)
- Executive Order: Implementing The President’s “Department of Government Efficiency” Workforce Optimization Initiative (Donald Trump, 2025)
- Executive Order: Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation (Donald Trump, 2025)
- Executive Order: Eliminating the Federal Executive Institute (Donald Trump, 2025)
- Executive Order: Council To Assess The Federal Emergency Management Agency (Donald Trump, 2025)
- Executive Order: Ending Radical And Wasteful Government DEI Programs And Preferencing (Donald Trump, 2025)
- Executive Order: Reforming The Federal Hiring Process And Restoring Merit To Government Service (Donald Trump, 2025)
- Executive Order: Establishing And Implementing The President’s “Department Of Government Efficiency” (Donald Trump, 2025)
- Executive Order: Restoring Accountability to Policy-Influencing Positions Within the Federal Workforce (Donald Trump, 2025)
- More executive orders
- Agencies
- Executive departments
- Dept. of State
- Dept. of Defense
- Dept. of Justice
- Dept. of the Treasury
- Dept. of Homeland Security
- Dept. of Education
- Dept. of Health and Human Services
- Dept. of Labor
- Dept. of Veterans Affairs
- Dept. of Transportation
- Dept. of Energy
- Dept. of Housing and Urban Development
- Dept. of the Interior
- Dept. of Agriculture
- Dept. of Commerce
- Executive agencies
- Independent agencies
- Executive departments
- Court cases
- Administrative state legislation tracker
| Administrative State |
|---|
| Read more about theadministrative state on Ballotpedia. |
| This article is a sprout; we plan on making it grow in the future. If you would like to help it grow, please considerdonating to Ballotpedia. |
TheNational Labor Relations Board (NLRB) is anindependent federal agency established in 1935.[1]
Noteworthy events
U.S. Supreme Court permits President Trump's firing of NLRB member (2025 )
In a 6-3 vote on May 22, 2025, the Supreme Court granted PresidentDonald Trump (R) the power to remove members of independent executive agencies without cause. The decision was not final, and the ruling stated that it did not apply to theFederal Reserve. This decision came after President Trump fired National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) member Gwynne Wilcox on January 27, 2025, three years before the expiration of her term, leaving the NLRB without a quorum. This was the first time that a president has ever fired a member of the NLRB. The temporary Supreme Court decision put on hold the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit's ruling to reinstate Wilcox and restore a NLRB quorum.[2][3]
NLRB rules that agency ALJs were properly appointed (2018)
The commissioners of theNational Labor Relations Board (NLRB) ruled on August 6, 2018, that the agency's ALJs were validly appointed by the agency pursuant to the Appointments Clause of theUnited States Constitution. The commissioners' unanimous vote rejected a challenge by Westrock Services Inc., a graphics printing company, that argued for the dismissal of the company's case before the NLRB on the grounds that the agency's ALJs had not been properly appointed.[4][5]
Westrock claimed that the NLRB's ALJs had not been appointed by the appropriate department head. The company argued that only the heads of cabinet-level agencies and the departments included under 5 U.S.C. § 101 constituted department heads for the purposes of the Appointments Clause. As such, Westrock argued that the NLRB commissioners did not have the authority to ratify their ALJ appointments.[4][5]
The NLRB commissioners rejected Westrock's claims and based their dismissal on theUnited States Supreme Court's decision inLucia v. SEC, which held that the ALJs of theSecurities and Exchange Commission (SEC) are inferior officers of the United States who must be appointed by the SEC commissioners, rather than hired by agency staff, in accordance with the Appointments Clause. The NLRB commissioners also citedFree Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, which held that the SEC, as a “freestanding component of the Executive Branch, not subordinate to or contained within any other such component, ... constitutes a ‘Departmen[t]’ for the purposes of the Appointments Clause.” Therefore, the NLRB concluded that its commissioners, like those of the SEC, jointly function as a department head for the purposes of the Appointment Clause.[5]
Westrock had not responded to the ruling as of August 7, 2018. The company can appeal the decision in federal court.[4]
U.S. Supreme Court upholds employer arbitration agreements, declines to applyChevron deference (2018)
On Monday, May 21, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that arbitration agreements between employers and employees are enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). The Supreme Court ruling reversed and remanded a decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, which had ruled that the agreement violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) and was not enforceable under the FAA.
The case involved a dispute between Epic Systems Corporation and a group of its employees regarding an arbitration agreement for wage-and-hour claims. In writing for the majority, Justice Neil Gorsuch observed that the case did not qualify forChevron deference—a principle of judicial review in which a federal court defers to a federal agency’s interpretation of an ambiguous statute that the agency administers.Chevron did not apply, according to Gorsuch, because no ambiguity existed in the NLRA statute, which is administered by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). Instead, Gorsuch wrote that the NLRB had sought to "interpret [the NLRA] in a way that limits the work of the Arbitration Act, which the agency does not administer."
Gorsuch further stated that Congress had put forth clear instructions for the enforcement of arbitration agreements in the NLRA and that any effort to change the policy must come from Congress itself. He wrote, "The policy may be debatable but the law is clear: Congress has instructed that arbitration agreements like those before us must be enforced as written. While Congress is of course always free to amend this judgment, we see nothing suggesting it did so in the NLRA—much less that it manifested a clear intention to displace the Arbitration Act.”[6][7]
See also
External links
Footnotes
- ↑National Labor Relations Board, "Our History," accessed April 9, 2018
- ↑Supreme Court of the United States, "DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL. v. GWYNNE A. WILCOX, ET AL." May 22, 2025
- ↑Associated Press, "Supreme Court declines to reinstate independent agency board members fired by President Donald Trump" May 22, 2025
- ↑4.04.14.2Bloomberg News, "Labor Board Affirms Appointments of In-House Judges," August 6, 2018
- ↑5.05.15.2National Labor Relations Board, "NLRB Administrative Law Judges Validly Appointed," August 6, 2018
- ↑WAMU, "Supreme Court Decision Delivers Blow To Workers’ Rights," May 21, 2018
- ↑Red State, "BREAKING. SCOTUS Overturns Arbitration Ruling By NLRB And Gives Congress Real Work To Do," May 21, 2018