Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot.Click to learn more!

Margin-of-victory (MOV)

From Ballotpedia


Election Policy Logo.png
Electoral system
Electoral systems by state
Ranked-choice voting (RCV)
Academic studies on RCV
Election dates
Election agencies
Election terms
Ballotpedia's Election Administration Legislation Tracker
Public Policy Logo-one line.png

An electoralmargin-of-victory (MOV) is the difference between the share of votes cast for the winning candidate and the second-place candidate in an election. For example, if Candidate A wins an election with 55 percent of the vote and Candidate B, the second-place finisher, wins 45 percent of the vote, the winner's margin of victory is 10 percent. Margins of victory can be used to measure electoral competitiveness, political party or candidate strength, and, indirectly, the popularity of a particular policy or set of policies.[1][2]

Usage

Ballotpedia calculates MOV as the percentage of total votes that separated the winner and the second-place finisher. For example, if the winner of a race received 47.2 percent of the vote and the second-place finisher received 45.8 percent of the vote, the MOV is calculated as 1.4 percent. In cases where a race is uncontested, the MOV is calculated as 100 percent. Ballotpedia uses MOV as a factor in determining thecompetitiveness of contests. In multi-winner elections, MOV is calculated as the difference between the winner with the fewest votes and the loser with the most votes.

Ballotpedia considers competitive races to be those with a MOV of less than 10 percent. Competitive districts are defined by a margin of victory of 5 percent or less. Mildly competitive districts were defined by a margin of victory between 5 and 10 percent. The MOV in previous Senate elections is one of the primary methods for estimating the potential competitiveness of a state in the future. In addition, MOV in past senate elections, how a president fared in each state is a big indicator of the political climate in a state. For instance, a Democratic incumbent in a state that supported President Donald Trump in 2016 is more likely to be vulnerable than a Democratic incumbent in a state that backed Hillary Clinton.

See also

State legislative competitiveness

External links

Footnotes

v • e
Election policy
Election legislationElection Policy on Ballotpedia Logo.png
Election administration
Voting policy
Electoral systems policy
Primary elections policy
Redistricting policy
Recount laws
Ballot access for
political candidates
Ballot access for
presidential candidates
Ballot access for
political parties
Electoral systems
Ballotpedia
Editorial Content
Josh Altic, Director of Content •Daniel Anderson, Associate Director of Elections & Data •Cory Eucalitto, Associate Director of Features •Ryan Byrne, Managing Editor of Ballot Measures •Mandy McConnell, Managing Editor of News •Doug Kronaizl, Managing Editor of Local Expansion •Abbey Smith, Managing Editor of Elections •Janie Valentine, Managing Editor of Law •Joel Williams, Managing Editor of Events •Joseph Greaney, Managing Editor of Policy •Andrew Bahl •Jaclyn Beran •Marielle Bricker •Joseph Brusgard •Emma Burlingame •Kelly Coyle •Jon Dunn •Victoria Edwards •Thomas Ellis •Nicole Fisher •Thomas Grobben •Brianna Hosea •Molly Kehoe •Tyler King •Glorie Martinez •Norm Leahy, Senior Editor •Nathan Maxwell •Jimmy McAllister •Brandon McCauley •Andrew McNair •Ellie Mikus •Mackenzie Murphy •Kaley Platek •Samantha Post •Adam Powell •Annelise Reinwald •Spencer Richardson •Victoria Rose •Briana Ryan •Myj Saintyl •Maddy Salucka •Emma Soukup •Alexis Thacker •Mina Vogel •Samuel Wonacott •Trenton Woodcox