Election law changes? Our legislation tracker’s got you.Check it out!

Jill Stein presidential campaign, 2016

From Ballotpedia
Jill Stein announced her presidential run on June 22, 2015.[1]

BP-Initials-UPDATED.pngBallotpedia'sscope changes periodically, and this article type is no longer actively created or maintained. If you would like to help our coverage grow, considerdonating to Ballotpedia.




Jill-Stein-circle.png

Jill Stein
Green presidential nominee
Running mate:Ajamu Baraka

Election
Green Party National ConventionPollsDebates Presidential election by stateBallot access

On the issues
Domestic affairsEconomic affairs and government regulationsForeign affairs and national security

Other candidates
Hillary Clinton (D) •Donald Trump (R) •Gary Johnson (L) •Vice presidential candidates

Ballotpedia's presidential election coverage
2028202420202016


Jill Stein was the 2016 Green nominee for president of the United States. She declared her candidacy on June 22, 2015, and officially received the nomination of theGreen Party on August 6, 2016, at theGreen Party National Convention. She was defeated byDonald Trump (R) in the general election on November 8, 2016.

For a decade, Stein was a fixture inMassachusetts state politics, running campaigns for state representative in 2004, secretary of the commonwealth in 2006, and governor in 2002 and 2010. She did not win any of these elections. She also ran for president in 2012, winning her party's nomination and securing 0.36 percent of the popular vote in the general election.

By trade, Stein is a physician who practiced internal medicine for 25 years. Although Stein retired in 2005, she frequently cited her professional background as a driving force for her entering the political arena in her 50s. She explained in one interview, "Now, I say I'm practicing political medicine instead of clinical medicine because it's the mother of all illnesses and we've got to fix this political disease so we can get down to fixing the things that threaten life, limb and even survival. That includes war, poverty and climate change, as well as our physical health."[2]

She supported progressive policy positions that would have moved "from the greed and exploitation of corporate capitalism to a human-centered economy that puts people, planet and peace over profit," according to her2016 campaign website. At the center of Stein's platform was the adoption of a "Green New Deal," which would have sought to create millions of new jobs and improve infrastructure, agriculture, and conservation in the United States.

See also:Fact check/Does half of the U.S. live "in or near poverty"?

On August 1, 2016, Stein announced that she had selected human rights advocateAjamu Baraka to be her running mate. She described him as an "activist, writer, intellectual and organizer with a powerful voice, vision, and lifelong commitment to building true political revolution."[3]

Stein typically received between 1 percent and 5 percent support in national polls in 2016. Under rules promulgated by theCommission on Presidential Debates (CPD), to qualify to participate in a presidential debate, a candidate must reach 15 percent support in an average of five selected national polls. Stein has said the CPD "is a thinly disguised scheme to protect the two establishment parties from competition" and called onHillary Clinton (D) andDonald Trump (R) to demand that she and Libertarian nomineeGary Johnson be allowed to join the debates.[4]

See also:Fact check/Are the presidential debates rigged in favor of major party candidates?
HIGHLIGHTS
  • Stein earned her medical degree from Harvard Medical School and practiced internal medicine for 25 years.
  • Stein previously ran for president in 2012 as the Green nominee. She came in fourth place in the general election, receiving 0.36 percent of the popular vote.
  • Central to Stein's platform was the adoption of the "Green New Deal," which would have sought to create millions of jobs and improve infrastructure and conservation through a nationwide transition to 100 percent renewable energy.
  • Interview with Ballotpedia

    On February 8, 2016,Jill Stein spoke with Ballotpedia about ballot access, her top policy initiatives, and the 2016 political climate.

    Stein on domestic affairs

    Stein had taken progressive positions on most social issues, supporting abortion rights, marriage equality, and the legalization of marijuana for medical and recreational use. She had called for terminating unconstitutional surveillance, closing Guantanamo, abolishing secret kill lists, and repealing indefinite detention without charge or trial. On education reform, Stein opposed high-stakes testing and the privatization of public schools. She defined healthcare as a basic human right and would have sought to implement a single-payer public health insurance program.

    Click the tiles below to learn more about Stein's positions on domestic affairs.

    Stein on economic affairs and government regulations

    Fundamental to Stein's platform was the adoption of a "Green New Deal" that would have created "living wage jobs," restore infrastructure across the country, and transition the country to a green economy. Stein supported reducing the deficit through the Green New Deal, cutting military spending, and changing how income is taxed. She had expressed opposition to the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the "globalized industrial factory" food system.

    Click the tiles below to learn more about Stein's positions on economic affairs and government regulations.

    Stein on foreign affairs and national security

    Stein had expressed support for a foreign policy focus on achieving peace and preserving human rights. According to her platform, Stein would have taken the following actions: "Establish a foreign policy based on diplomacy, international law, and human rights. End the wars and drone attacks, cut military spending by at least 50% and close the 700+ foreign military bases that are turning our republic into a bankrupt empire. Stop U.S. support and arms sales to human rights abusers, and lead on global nuclear disarmament."[5]

    Click the tiles below to learn more about Stein's positions on foreign affairs and national security.

    Polls

    All head-to-head polling and archives of primary polls dating back to 2013 can be seen on the fullpresidential polling page.


    Polls including third party candidates - (September-October 2016)
    PollDemocratic Party Hillary ClintonRepublican Party Donald TrumpLibertarian Party Gary JohnsonGreen Party Jill SteinUnsure or OtherMargin of ErrorSample Size
    ABC News/Washington Post
    October 10-13, 2016
    47%43%5%2%3%+/-4740
    NBC News/Wall St. Journal
    October 10-13, 2016
    48%37%7%2%6%+/-3.3905
    GWU/Battleground
    October 8-13, 2016
    47%39%8%2%4%+/-3.11,000
    Fox News
    October 10-12, 2016
    45%38%7%3%7%+/-3917
    NBC News/Wall Street Journal
    October 8-10, 2016
    46%37%8%2%7%+/-3.5806
    Reuters/Ipsos
    October 6-10, 2016
    44%37%6%2%11%+/-2.22,363
    Rasmussen
    October 5-9, 2016
    45%38%7%2%8%+/-2.51,500
    NBC News/SurveyMonkey
    October 3-9, 2016
    46%41%8%3%2%+/-123,329
    Economist/YouGov
    October 7-8, 2016
    44%38%5%1%12%+/-4.2971
    Quinnipiac
    October 5-6, 2016
    45%40%6%3%6%+/-31,064
    Fox News
    October 3-6, 2016
    44%42%6%2%6%+/-3896
    Rasmussen Reports
    October 3-5, 2016
    41%43%8%3%5%+/-2.51,500
    Economist/YouGov
    October 1-October 3, 2016
    43%40%5%3%9%+/-3.9911
    Reuters/Ipsos
    September 29-October 3, 2016
    42%36%8%2%12%+/-3.21,239
    CBS News
    September 28-October 2, 2016
    45%41%8%3%3%+/-41,217
    CNN/ORC
    September 28-October 2, 2016
    47%42%7%2%2%+/-31,213
    NBC News/SurveyMonkey
    September 26-October 2, 2016
    46%40%9%3%2%+/-126,925
    Fox News
    September 27-29, 2016
    43%40%8%4%5%+/-3911
    Public Policy Polling
    September 27-28, 2016
    44%40%6%1%9%+/-3.2933
    Reuters/Ipsos
    September 22-26, 2016
    42%38%7%2%9%+/-3.51,041
    Quinnipiac
    September 22-25, 2016
    44%43%8%2%3%+/-3.11,115
    Monmouth
    September 22-25, 2016
    46%42%8%2%2%+/-3.6729
    Economist/YouGov
    September 22-24, 2016
    44%41%5%2%8%+/-3.8948
    Bloomberg
    September 21-24, 2016
    41%43%8%4%4%+/-3.11,002
    ABC News/Washington Post
    September 19-22, 2016
    46%44%5%1%4%+/-4.5651
    Note: A "0%" finding means the candidate was not a part of the poll. The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email toeditor@ballotpedia.org.

    Ballot access

    Some states have special provisions permitting parties to place presidential candidates on the ballot without attaining full ballot status. Ballot access for the presidential candidates of select minor parties in previous election cycles is detailed below.

    Presidential ballot access, 2024

    See also:Presidential candidates, 2024.

    There were 11 candidates on the ballot inLouisiana, more than in any other state.Washington came in second, with 10 candidates.New York had two candidates on the ballot, the fewest in 2024.

    The following map shows the number of presidential candidates on the ballot in 2024 in each state.

    For information from previously presidential election years, click "[Show more]" below.

    Show more

    Presidential ballot access, 2020

    See also:Presidential candidates, 2020

    There were 21 candidates on the ballot each inVermont andColorado, more than in any other state.Arkansas andLouisiana came in second, with 13 candidates each. Twelve states featured only three candidates on the ballot.

    The following map shows the number of presidential candidates on the ballot in 2020 in each state.

    Presidential ballot access, 2016

    See also:Presidential candidates, 2016

    In 2016, the Democratic and Republican parties were fully ballot-qualified in all 50 states, granting them presidential ballot access by default. The following large minor parties achieved presidential ballot access as indicated:[6][7][8]

    1. Libertarian Party: 50 states
    2. Green Party: 44 states (write-in status in an additional three states)
    3. Constitution Party: 24 states (write-in status in an additional 22 states)

    The maps below provide further details for each of these parties. Hover over a state to see further details.

    Impact of minor party presidential candidates on party ballot status

    In some states, the performance of a minor party's presidential candidate can directly help that party attain state ballot status. The table below identifies state-level affiliates of the Libertarian and Green parties that gained ballot status between 2016 and 2017.[9] The table also indicates whether the performance of a presidential candidate can figure directly in methods for attaining ballot status.

    Impact of minor party presidential candidates on parties attaining ballot status between 2016 and 2017
    Political partyStateMethods for attaining ballot statusImpact of candidate on party statusNotes
    Libertarian PartyIowaCandidate petition, then poll 2%
    Hold meeting of 250, then poll 2%[10]
    Party met multiple thresholds for ballot statusThe Libertarian Party also ran a candidate for the United States Senate who won 2.6% of the total votes cast for that office.[11]
    Libertarian PartyMassachusettsRegistration drive, 1%
    Candidate petition, then poll 3%[10]
    Direct impactThe Libertarian candidate for president,Gary Johnson, won 4.2% of the total votes cast for that office. No other statewide contests featured Libertarians.[12]
    Libertarian PartyNew HampshireCandidate petition, then poll 4%
    Petition of 3% of last gubernatorial vote[10]
    Party met multiple thresholds for ballot statusThe Libertarian Party's candidate for governor,Max Abramson, won 4.3% of the total votes cast for that office.[13]
    Libertarian PartySouth DakotaPetition of 2.5% of last gubernatorial vote[10]No direct impactThe performance of a party's presidential candidate cannot directly help that party attain ballot status.
    Green PartyDelawareRegistration drive, 0.1%No direct impact[10]The performance of a party's presidential candidate cannot directly help that party attain ballot status.
    Green PartyMissouriPetition of 10,000 signaturesNo direct impact[10]The performance of a party's presidential candidate cannot directly help that party attain ballot status.


    Recent news

    The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the termsJill Stein 2016. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

    See also

    Footnotes

    1. Democracy Now, "Green Party’s Jill Stein Announces She Is Running for President," June 22, 2015
    2. The Diane Rehm Show, "A Conversation With Green Party Candidate Jill Stein," August 1, 2016
    3. TIME, "Green Party’s Jill Stein Selects Human-Rights Activist Ajamu Baraka as Running Mate," August 1, 2016
    4. The Guardian, "It is undemocratic to exclude me and Gary Johnson from presidential debates," September 6, 2016
    5. Jill Stein for President, "Power to the People Plan," accessed July 20, 206
    6. Libertarian Party, "2016 Presidential Ballot Access Map," accessed November 8, 2016
    7. Green Party US, "Ballot Access," accessed November 8, 2016
    8. Constitution Party, "Ballot Access," accessed November 8, 2016
    9. Affiliates of the Constitution Party are not included because no state affiliates of the party attained new ballot status between 2016 and 2017.
    10. 10.010.110.210.310.410.5Ballot Access News, "April 1, 2017 – Volume 32, Number 11," accessed July 28, 2017
    11. Iowa Secretary of State, "2016 General Election Canvass Summary," accessed July 28, 2017
    12. Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth, "Election results," accessed July 28, 2017
    13. New Hampshire Secretary of State, "Governor - 2016 General Election," accessed July 28, 2017
    v  e
    2016 United States Presidential Election
    OverviewsPresidential Elections-2016-badge.png
    Candidate profiles
    Path to the presidency
    Policy positions
    On the campaign trail
    Campaign staff
    Debates
    Analysis
    The media's coverage of Donald TrumpThe media's coverage of Hillary Clinton

    Post-debate analysis overview
    Democratic:April 14, 2016 (CNN)March 9, 2016 (Univision)March 6, 2016 (CNN)February 11, 2016 (PBS)February 4, 2016 (MSNBC)January 17, 2016 (NBC)December 19, 2015 (ABC)November 14, 2015 (CBS)October 13, 2015 (CNN)
    Republican:March 10, 2016 (CNN)March 3, 2016 (FNC)February 25, 2016 (CNN)February 13, 2016 (CBS)February 6, 2016 (ABC)January 28, 2016 (FNC)January 14, 2016 (FBN)December 15, 2015 (CNN)November 10, 2015 (FBN)October 28, 2015 (CNBC)September 16, 2015 (CNN)

    Insiders Poll: First Democratic debate (October 13, 2015)Presidential Nominating Index: Clinton remains choice of Democratic InsidersPresidential Nominating Index: Bush remains choice of Republican InsidersInsiders Poll: Winners and losers from the Fox News Republican Debate
    Ballotpedia
    Editorial Content
    Josh Altic, Director of ContentDaniel Anderson, Associate Director of Elections & DataCory Eucalitto, Associate Director of FeaturesRyan Byrne, Managing Editor of Ballot MeasuresMandy McConnell, Managing Editor of NewsDoug Kronaizl, Managing Editor of Local ExpansionAbbey Smith, Managing Editor of ElectionsJanie Valentine, Managing Editor of LawJoel Williams, Managing Editor of EventsJoseph Greaney, Managing Editor of PolicyAndrew BahlJaclyn BeranMarielle BrickerJoseph BrusgardEmma BurlingameKelly CoyleJon DunnVictoria EdwardsThomas EllisNicole FisherThomas GrobbenBrianna HoseaMolly KehoeTyler KingGlorie MartinezNorm Leahy, Senior EditorNathan MaxwellJimmy McAllisterBrandon McCauleyAndrew McNairEllie MikusMackenzie MurphyKaley PlatekSamantha PostAdam PowellAnnelise ReinwaldSpencer RichardsonVictoria RoseBriana RyanMyj SaintylMaddy SaluckaEmma SoukupAlexis ThackerMina VogelSamuel WonacottTrenton Woodcox