Public policy made simple. Dive into ourinformation hub today!

Final rule

From Ballotpedia
New Administrative State Banner.png
What is rulemaking in the context of the administrative state?

Rulemaking is a process by which administrative agencies amend, repeal, or create an administrative regulation. The most common rulemaking process isinformal rulemaking, which solicits written public feedback onproposed rules during acomment period. When required by statute, certain agencies must follow theformal rulemaking process, which incorporates a trial-like hearing in place of theinformalcomment period, orhybrid rulemaking, which blends specified elements offormal rulemaking into theinformal rulemaking process. Learn aboutrulemaking here.

Administrative State
Administrative State Icon Gold.png

Read more about theadministrative state on Ballotpedia.


Afinal rule, in the context ofadministrative rulemaking, is a federal administrative regulation that advanced through theproposed rule andpublic comment stages of therulemaking process and is published in theFederal Register with a scheduled effective date. The published final rule marks the last stage in therulemaking process and includes information about the rationale for the regulation as well as any necessary responses to public comments.[1][2]

Background

A final rule either implements a new federal agency regulation, modifies an existing regulation, or rescinds a previous regulation.[2]

After an agency publishes aproposed rule in theFederal Register and receives public comments, the agency may proceed to issue a final rule. According to theFederal Register, a final rule is only issued when an agency can "conclude that its proposed solution will help accomplish the goals or solve the problems identified. It must also consider whether alternate solutions would be more effective or cost less."[3]

A final rule generally goes into effect no less than 30 days after the publication date in theFederal Register. Final rules that are categorized assignificant rules andmajor rules take effect no less than 60 days after publication. In order for a final rule to take effect at an earlier date, an agency must cite good cause, which theFederal Register defines as persuasive reasoning, to demonstrate that the rule is in the public interest.[3]

Structure

Final rules follow a specific format for publication in theFederal Register. The final rule begins with a preamble, which includes several subsections, continues with a statement of authority, and concludes with the full text of the measure.[3]

Preamble

The preamble of a final rule is made up of the following subsections:[3]

  • Summary
    The summary section provides information about the agency's rationale behind the final rule, including contributing societal challenges and regulatory objectives.
  • Dates
    The dates section includes information about the final rule's effective date as well as any compliance dates, applicability dates, or any exceptions requiring congressional approval or compliance with thePaperwork Reduction Act.
  • Supplementary information
    The supplementary information section includes information about the basis and purpose of the final rule. According to theFederal Register, the basis and purpose description "sets out the goals or problems the rule addresses, describes the facts and data the agency relies on, responds to major criticisms in the proposed rule comments, and explains why the agency did not choose other alternatives."[3]

Statement of authority

The final rule must identify the agency's legal authority for issuing the rule.[3]

Full text

The final rule must include the full regulatory text of the rule. The regulatory text proposes amendments to theCode of Federal Regulations (CFR), complete with instructions for including each amendment in the CFR.[3]

Related rules

Interim final rule

According to theFederal Register, an interim final rule occurs "when an agency finds that it has good cause to issue a final rule without first publishing aproposed rule." The published interim final rule is effective immediately. An agency may modify an interim final rule at a later date based on public comments, or it may formalize the existing rule by publishing it as a final rule in theFederal Register.[3]

Direct final rule

According to theFederal Register, a direct final rule occurs "when an agency decides that a proposed rule is unnecessary because it would only relate to routine or uncontroversial matters." In these cases, the agency publishes the direct final rule in theFederal Register and provides a proposed effective date for the rule in the event that it does not receive any opposition during thepublic comment period. If the agency receives opposition to the direct final rule, the agency must withdraw the rule. Otherwise, the agency may proceed to publish the rule as a final rule in theFederal Register.[3]

See also

External links

Footnotes

v  e
The Administrative State
MainThe Administrative State Project Badge.png
Pillars
Reporting
Laws
Administrative Procedure ActAntiquities ActCivil Service Reform ActClayton Antitrust ActCommunications Act of 1934Congressional Review ActElectronic Freedom of Information ActFederal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938Federal Housekeeping StatuteFederal Reserve ActFederal Trade Commission Act of 1914Freedom of Information ActGovernment in the Sunshine ActIndependent Offices Appropriations Act of 1952Information Quality ActInterstate Commerce ActNational Labor Relations ActPaperwork Reduction ActPendleton ActPrivacy Act of 1974Regulatory Flexibility ActREINS ActREINS Act (Wisconsin)Securities Act of 1933Securities Exchange Act of 1934Sherman Antitrust ActSmall Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness ActTruth in Regulating ActUnfunded Mandates Reform Act
Cases
Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerA.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesAssociation of Data Processing Service Organizations v. CampAuer v. RobbinsChevron v. Natural Resources Defense CouncilCitizens to Preserve Overton Park v. VolpeFederal Trade Commission (FTC) v. Standard Oil Company of CaliforniaField v. ClarkFood and Drug Administration v. Brown and Williamson Tobacco CorporationHumphrey's Executor v. United StatesImmigration and Naturalization Service (INS) v. ChadhaJ.W. Hampton Jr. & Company v. United StatesLucia v. SECMarshall v. Barlow'sMassachusetts v. Environmental Protection AgencyMistretta v. United StatesNational Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) v. SebeliusNational Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning CompanyNational Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSecurities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery CorporationSkidmore v. Swift & Co.United States v. LopezUnited States v. Western Pacific Railroad Co.Universal Camera Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardVermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense CouncilWayman v. SouthardWeyerhaeuser Company v. United States Fish and Wildlife ServiceWhitman v. American Trucking AssociationsWickard v. FilburnWiener v. United States
Terms
Adjudication (administrative state)Administrative judgeAdministrative lawAdministrative law judgeAdministrative stateArbitrary-or-capricious testAuer deferenceBarrier to entryBootleggers and BaptistsChevron deference (doctrine)Civil servantCivil serviceCode of Federal RegulationsCodify (administrative state)Comment periodCompliance costsCongressional RecordCoordination (administrative state)Deference (administrative state)Direct and indirect costs (administrative state)Enabling statuteEx parte communication (administrative state)Executive agencyFederal lawFederal RegisterFederalismFinal ruleFormal rulemakingFormalism (law)Functionalism (law)Guidance (administrative state)Hybrid rulemakingIncorporation by referenceIndependent federal agencyInformal rulemakingJoint resolution of disapproval (administrative state)Major ruleNegotiated rulemakingNondelegation doctrineOIRA prompt letterOrganic statutePragmatism (law)Precautionary principlePromulgateProposed rulePublication rulemakingRegulatory budgetRegulatory captureRegulatory dark matterRegulatory impact analysisRegulatory policy officerRegulatory reform officerRegulatory reviewRent seekingRetrospective regulatory reviewRisk assessment (administrative state)RulemakingSeparation of powersSignificant regulatory actionSkidmore deferenceStatutory authoritySubstantive law and procedural lawSue and settleSunset provisionUnified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory ActionsUnited States CodeUnited States Statutes at Large
Bibliography
Agencies
Ballotpedia
Editorial Content
Josh Altic, Director of ContentDaniel Anderson, Associate Director of Elections & DataCory Eucalitto, Associate Director of FeaturesRyan Byrne, Managing Editor of Ballot MeasuresMandy McConnell, Managing Editor of NewsDoug Kronaizl, Managing Editor of Local ExpansionAbbey Smith, Managing Editor of ElectionsJanie Valentine, Managing Editor of LawJoel Williams, Managing Editor of EventsAndrew BahlJaclyn BeranMarielle BrickerJoseph BrusgardEmma BurlingameKelly CoyleJon DunnVictoria EdwardsThomas EllisNicole FisherJoseph GreaneyThomas GrobbenBrianna HoseaMolly KehoeTyler KingGlorie MartinezNorm Leahy, Senior EditorNathan MaxwellJimmy McAllisterBrandon McCauleyEllie MikusEllen MorrisseyMackenzie MurphyKaley PlatekSamantha PostAdam PowellAnnelise ReinwaldEthan RiceSpencer RichardsonVictoria RoseBriana RyanMyj SaintylMaddy SaluckaEmma SoukupAlexis ThackerMina VogelSamuel WonacottTrenton Woodcox