Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot.Click to learn more!

Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914

From Ballotpedia
New Administrative State Banner.png


Administrative State
Administrative State Icon Gold.png
Five Pillars of the Administrative State
Agency control
Executive control
Judicial control
Legislative control
Public Control

Click here for more coverage of theadministrative state on Ballotpedia.
Click here to accessBallotpedia's administrative state legislation tracker.

TheFederal Trade Commission Act (FTCA) is a federal law passed in 1914 establishing theFederal Trade Commission (FTC). It was signed into law by President Woodrow Wilson on September 26, 1914. The five-member body was created to protect consumers by preventing what it deemed unfair methods of competition between businesses and deceptive business practices. The FTC investigates “price-fixing agreements and other unfair methods of competition;” prohibits “mergers and price discriminations that threatened to lessen competition;” investigates “deceptive practices such as false advertising;” and regulates “packaging and labeling of consumer goods to prevent deception,” according to the National Archives and Records Administration. It replaced the Bureau of Corporations.[1][2]

Background

During the Progressive Era, there was an effort to regulate monopolies through antitrust laws. In 1890, Congress passed theSherman Act, which forbade “[e]very contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations,” and made it illegal “to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize any part of the tradeor commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations.” Questions about the Sherman Act that were raised in the 1911 U.S. Supreme Court casesStandard Oil Co. v United States andUnited States v. American Tobacco Co. made antitrust laws central to the 1912 election. This issue led in part to PresidentWoodrow Wilson's election.[3]

In 1913, during his first year in office, Wilson created the Bureau of Corporations, which was tasked with investigating monopolistic business practices. Then, in 1914, with the backing of Wilson, the Federal Trade Commission Act created the Federal Trade Commission. The Senate approved the FTCA on September 8, 1914, by a vote of 43-5. The House approved the bill by voice vote on September 10, 1914. The commission was launched in March 1915. The FTC replaced the Bureau of Corporations, which was created under President Theodore Roosevelt, and expanded its authority.[4]

Provisions

The FTCA created the Federal Trade Commission. The act gave the commission the authority to “(a) prevent unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce; (b) seek monetary redress and other relief for conduct injurious to consumers; (c) prescribe rules defining with specificity acts or practices that are unfair or deceptive, and establishing requirements designed to prevent such acts or practices; (d) gather and compile information and conduct investigations relating to the organization, business, practices, and management of entities engaged in commerce; and (e) make reports and legislative recommendations to Congress and the public.”[5]

Commission members

The five commissioners of the FTC are nominated by the president and must be confirmed by the Senate. Commissioners are appointed for seven-year terms. No more than three of the FTC members can be from the same political party.[1]

Unfair Practices

The FTCA bans unfair business practices. According to Al Krulick ofDebt.org, “the FTC considers a set of criteria established in the Supreme Court’s 1972 Sperry and Hutchinson ruling” to determine whether a practice is unfair. The criteria include unjustified consumer injury, violation of public policy, and deceptive practices.Cite error: Invalid<ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too many

FTC Bureaus

The FTC includes the Bureau of Consumer Protection, the Bureau of Competition, and the Bureau of Economics.Cite error: Invalid<ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too many

Enforcement

According to Krulick, if the FTC finds that a business violated the provisions of the FTCA, the FTC can “seek compliance through a consent order, or file an administrative complaint. Litigation is also possible. Administrative complaints are heard in front of an independent administrative law judge, with the FTC serving as prosecutor. The FTC can also bring cases to the federal courts, which can impose fines, appoint receivers and monitors, and freeze business assets when deemed necessary. The FTC also promulgates and enforces trade rules, which regulate business practices.”Cite error: Invalid<ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too many

Amending statutes

Below is a partial list of subsequent laws that amended provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act:[6]

  • TheRobinson-Patman Act (1936) outlawedprice discrimination, defined byInvestopedia as "a pricing strategy that charges customers different prices for the same product or service." This act added price discrimination as an anticompetitive practice regulated by the FTC.[7][8]
  • TheWheeler-Lea Act (1938) expanded the FTC's regulatory authority to include unfair and deceptive practices targeting consumers, such as false advertising. Prior to this act, the FTC was limited to regulating anticompetitive practices among businesses.[9]
  • TheMagnuson-Moss Warranty—Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act (1975) authorized the FTC to regulate written warranties on consumer products.[10]
  • TheHart-Scott-Rodino Act (1976) requires the parties to a large merger or acquisition to provide notification and information to the FTC before the transaction is completed.[11]

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.01.1Office of the Legislative Counsel, "Federal Trade Commission Act," accessed January 21, 2018
  2. National Archives and Records Administration, "Federal Trade Commission. 1914-," accessed January 21, 2018
  3. FTC.gov, "The Origins Of The FTC: Concentration, Cooperation, Control, And Competition," accessed January 21, 2018
  4. FTC.gov, "The Origins Of The FTC: Concentration, Cooperation, Control, And Competition," accessed January 21, 2018
  5. FTC.gov, "Federal Trade Commission Act," accessed January 21, 2018
  6. FTC.gov, "Federal Trade Commission Federal Trade Commission 90th Anniversary Symposium 90th Anniversary Symposium," September 22-23, 2004
  7. Investopedia, "Robinson-Patman Act," accessed March 12, 2018
  8. Investopedia, "Price Discrimination," accessed March 12, 2018
  9. AllBusiness, "Wheeler-Lea Act," accessed March 12, 2018
  10. Federal Trade Commission, "Magnuson Moss Warranty-Federal Trade Commission Improvements Act," accessed March 12, 2018
  11. Federal Trade Commission, "Premerger Notification Program," accessed March 12, 2018
v  e
The Administrative State
MainThe Administrative State Project Badge.png
Pillars
Reporting
Laws
Administrative Procedure ActAntiquities ActCivil Service Reform ActClayton Antitrust ActCommunications Act of 1934Congressional Review ActElectronic Freedom of Information ActFederal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938Federal Housekeeping StatuteFederal Reserve ActFederal Trade Commission Act of 1914Freedom of Information ActGovernment in the Sunshine ActIndependent Offices Appropriations Act of 1952Information Quality ActInterstate Commerce ActNational Labor Relations ActPaperwork Reduction ActPendleton ActPrivacy Act of 1974Regulatory Flexibility ActREINS ActREINS Act (Wisconsin)Securities Act of 1933Securities Exchange Act of 1934Sherman Antitrust ActSmall Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness ActTruth in Regulating ActUnfunded Mandates Reform Act
Cases
Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerA.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesAssociation of Data Processing Service Organizations v. CampAuer v. RobbinsChevron v. Natural Resources Defense CouncilCitizens to Preserve Overton Park v. VolpeFederal Trade Commission (FTC) v. Standard Oil Company of CaliforniaField v. ClarkFood and Drug Administration v. Brown and Williamson Tobacco CorporationHumphrey's Executor v. United StatesImmigration and Naturalization Service (INS) v. ChadhaJ.W. Hampton Jr. & Company v. United StatesLucia v. SECMarshall v. Barlow'sMassachusetts v. Environmental Protection AgencyMistretta v. United StatesNational Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) v. SebeliusNational Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning CompanyNational Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSecurities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery CorporationSkidmore v. Swift & Co.United States v. LopezUnited States v. Western Pacific Railroad Co.Universal Camera Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardVermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense CouncilWayman v. SouthardWeyerhaeuser Company v. United States Fish and Wildlife ServiceWhitman v. American Trucking AssociationsWickard v. FilburnWiener v. United States
Terms
Adjudication (administrative state)Administrative judgeAdministrative lawAdministrative law judgeAdministrative stateArbitrary-or-capricious testAuer deferenceBarrier to entryBootleggers and BaptistsChevron deference (doctrine)Civil servantCivil serviceCode of Federal RegulationsCodify (administrative state)Comment periodCompliance costsCongressional RecordCoordination (administrative state)Deference (administrative state)Direct and indirect costs (administrative state)Enabling statuteEx parte communication (administrative state)Executive agencyFederal lawFederal RegisterFederalismFinal ruleFormal rulemakingFormalism (law)Functionalism (law)Guidance (administrative state)Hybrid rulemakingIncorporation by referenceIndependent federal agencyInformal rulemakingJoint resolution of disapproval (administrative state)Major ruleNegotiated rulemakingNondelegation doctrineOIRA prompt letterOrganic statutePragmatism (law)Precautionary principlePromulgateProposed rulePublication rulemakingRegulatory budgetRegulatory captureRegulatory dark matterRegulatory impact analysisRegulatory policy officerRegulatory reform officerRegulatory reviewRent seekingRetrospective regulatory reviewRisk assessment (administrative state)RulemakingSeparation of powersSignificant regulatory actionSkidmore deferenceStatutory authoritySubstantive law and procedural lawSue and settleSunset provisionUnified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory ActionsUnited States CodeUnited States Statutes at Large
Bibliography
Agencies
Ballotpedia
Editorial Content
Josh Altic, Director of ContentDaniel Anderson, Associate Director of Elections & DataCory Eucalitto, Associate Director of FeaturesRyan Byrne, Managing Editor of Ballot MeasuresMandy McConnell, Managing Editor of NewsDoug Kronaizl, Managing Editor of Local ExpansionAbbey Smith, Managing Editor of ElectionsJanie Valentine, Managing Editor of LawJoel Williams, Managing Editor of EventsJoseph Greaney, Managing Editor of PolicyAndrew BahlJaclyn BeranMarielle BrickerJoseph BrusgardEmma BurlingameKelly CoyleJon DunnVictoria EdwardsThomas EllisNicole FisherThomas GrobbenBrianna HoseaMolly KehoeTyler KingGlorie MartinezNorm Leahy, Senior EditorNathan MaxwellJimmy McAllisterBrandon McCauleyAndrew McNairEllie MikusMackenzie MurphyKaley PlatekSamantha PostAdam PowellAnnelise ReinwaldSpencer RichardsonVictoria RoseBriana RyanMyj SaintylMaddy SaluckaEmma SoukupAlexis ThackerMina VogelSamuel WonacottTrenton Woodcox