Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

- The Administrative State
- Administrative State Index
- Ballotpedia's Five Pillars
- Educational opportunities related to the administrative state
- The Checks and Balances Newsletter
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- Tracking
- Terms and definitions
- Glossary of administrative state terms
- Deference
- Rulemaking
- Formal rulemaking
- Informal rulemaking
- Hybrid rulemaking
- Proposed rule
- Final rule
- Comment period
- Ex parte communications
- Judicial review
- Nondelegation doctrine
- Adjudication
- Administrative law judge
- Due process
- Federalism
- Guidance
- Executive agency
- Independent federal agency
- More terms and definitions
- Laws and statutes
- Executive orders
- Jimmy Carter
- Ronald Reagan
- Bill Clinton
- George W. Bush
- Barack Obama
- Donald Trump (first term)
- Presidential Executive Order 13765 (Donald Trump, 2017)
- Presidential Executive Order 13771 (Donald Trump, 2017)
- Presidential Executive Order 13772 (Donald Trump, 2017)
- Presidential Executive Order 13777 (Donald Trump, 2017)
- Presidential Executive Order 13781 (Donald Trump, 2017)
- Presidential Executive Order 13783 (Donald Trump, 2017)
- Presidential Executive Order 13789 (Donald Trump, 2017)
- Presidential Executive Order 13836 (Donald Trump, 2018)
- Presidential Executive Order 13837 (Donald Trump, 2018)
- Presidential Executive Order 13839 (Donald Trump, 2018)
- Presidential Executive Order 13843 (Donald Trump, 2018)
- Joseph Biden
- Donald Trump (second term)
- Executive Order: Exclusions From Federal Labor-Management Relations Programs (Donald Trump, 2025)
- Executive Order: Stopping Waste, Fraud, and Abuse by Eliminating Information Silos (Donald Trump, 2025)
- Executive Order: Eliminating Waste and Saving Taxpayer Dollars by Consolidating Procurement (Donald Trump, 2025)
- Executive Order: Continuing the Reduction of the Federal Bureaucracy (Donald Trump, 2025)
- Executive Order: Implementing the President's "Department of Government Efficiency" Cost Efficiency Initiative (Donald Trump, 2025)
- Executive Order: Ensuring Lawful Governance and Implementing the President's "Department of Government Efficiency" Deregulatory Initiative (Donald Trump, 2025)
- Executive Order: Commencing the Reduction of the Federal Bureaucracy (Donald Trump, 2025)
- Executive Order: Ensuring Accountability for All Agencies (Donald Trump, 2025)
- Executive Order: Implementing The President’s “Department of Government Efficiency” Workforce Optimization Initiative (Donald Trump, 2025)
- Executive Order: Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation (Donald Trump, 2025)
- Executive Order: Eliminating the Federal Executive Institute (Donald Trump, 2025)
- Executive Order: Council To Assess The Federal Emergency Management Agency (Donald Trump, 2025)
- Executive Order: Ending Radical And Wasteful Government DEI Programs And Preferencing (Donald Trump, 2025)
- Executive Order: Reforming The Federal Hiring Process And Restoring Merit To Government Service (Donald Trump, 2025)
- Executive Order: Establishing And Implementing The President’s “Department Of Government Efficiency” (Donald Trump, 2025)
- Executive Order: Restoring Accountability to Policy-Influencing Positions Within the Federal Workforce (Donald Trump, 2025)
- More executive orders
- Agencies
- Executive departments
- Dept. of State
- Dept. of Defense
- Dept. of Justice
- Dept. of the Treasury
- Dept. of Homeland Security
- Dept. of Education
- Dept. of Health and Human Services
- Dept. of Labor
- Dept. of Veterans Affairs
- Dept. of Transportation
- Dept. of Energy
- Dept. of Housing and Urban Development
- Dept. of the Interior
- Dept. of Agriculture
- Dept. of Commerce
- Executive agencies
- Independent agencies
- Executive departments
- Court cases
- Administrative state legislation tracker
- Research
| Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission | |
| Basic facts | |
| Location: | Washington, D.C. |
| Type: | Independent federal agency |
| Top official: | Mary Lu Jordan, Chair |
| Year founded: | 1977 |
| Website: | Official website |
TheFederal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (FMSHRC) is anindependent federal agency established in 1977 thatadjudicates legal disputes regarding the health and safety of mining operations pursuant to the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977. The commission's responsibilities are limited toadjudication proceedings. The agency does not issue or enforce regulations.[1][2]
Background
- See also:Adjudication
The FMSHRC was established under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977. Under the act, theU.S. Department of Labor (DOL) is authorized to issue regulations concerning the health and safety of the nation's mine operations. The regulations are enforced by mine inspectors employed by the DOL's Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA). Mine inspectors have the authority to issue citations and orders to mining facilities that violate regulations. Legal disputes that arise out of the MSHA's enforcement actions areadjudicated before the FMSHRC.[1][2]
The FMSHRC operates as anindependent federal agency led by five commissioners appointed by the president. As such, the agency is not affiliated with the DOL. The agency's administrative law judges (ALJs) hear cases and issue decisions. Cases before the FMSHRC generally concern disputes over alleged health and safety violations, mine closure orders, or proposed penalties. Appealed decisions are reviewed by the FMSHRC's commissioners at their discretion. All further appeals are directed to theUnited States courts of appeals.[1][3]
Leadership
| Administrative State |
|---|
| Read more about theadministrative state on Ballotpedia. |
The following individuals held leadership positions with the FMSHRC as of June 2025:[4]
- Mary Lu Jordan,Chair
- Moshe Z. Marvit.,Commissioner
- Timothy J. Baker,Commissioner
- Vacant,Commissioner
- Vacant,Commissioner
Noteworthy events
Federal appeals court finds appointments of agency ALJs invalid (2018)
A three-judge panel of theUnited States Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit held on July 31, 2018, that theFederal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission’s (FMSHRC) roster of ALJs was invalidly appointed. The panel ruled that the FMSHRC’s commissioners, rather than its chief ALJ, must appoint the agency's ALJs pursuant to the Appointments Clause of theUnited States Constitution. The panel consisted of judgesJeffrey Sutton,Deborah Cook, andRalph Guy.[5][6]
The panel issued the decision inJones Brothers Inc., Petitioner, v. Secretary of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration; Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, a case on appeal from the FMSHRC concerning a fine issued to Jones Brothers by the Mine Safety and Health Administration for certain safety violations. The panel vacated the FMSHRC’s decision and remanded the case to the agency for new proceedings before a validly appointed ALJ.[5]
The panel opinion cited theUnited States Supreme Court's decision inLucia v. SEC, which held that the ALJs of theSecurities and Exchange Commission (SEC) are inferior officers of the United States who must be appointed by the SEC commissioners, rather than hired by agency staff, in accordance with the Appointments Clause.[5]
See also
External links
Footnotes
- ↑1.01.11.2Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, "About," accessed February 22, 2024
- ↑2.02.1Government Publishing Office, "Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977," accessed August 24, 2018
- ↑U.S. Department of Labor, "Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission," accessed August 24, 2018
- ↑Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, "Chairman and Commissioner Tenure," accessed June 12, 2025
- ↑5.05.15.2United States Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit, "Jones Brothers Inc., Petitioner, v. Secretary of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration; Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission," July 31, 2018
- ↑Reuters, "6th Circuit says MSHA judges' appointments invalid," July 31, 2018
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||