Public policy made simple. Dive into ourinformation hub today!

Diane Wood

From Ballotpedia
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the official's last term in officecovered by Ballotpedia. Pleasecontact us with any updates.
Diane Wood
United States Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit
Tenure
2022 - Present
Years in position
3
Prior offices:
United States Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit
Years in office: 1995 - 2022
Education
Bachelor's
University of Texas, Austin, 1971
Law
University of Texas School of Law, 1975
Personal
Birthplace
Plainfield, NJ

Diane Pamela Wood is a judge onsenior status with theUnited States Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit. Wood was nominated to the Seventh Circuit by PresidentBill Clinton (D) on March 31, 1995. She was confirmed unanimously by theU.S. Senate and received her commission on June 30, 1995. Wood assumed senior status on September 7, 2022.[1]

Wood was elevated to the position ofchief judge onOctober 1, 2013, succeedingFrank Easterbrook.[2] She left the position of chief judge in 2020.


Biography

Early life and education

Wood was born in Plainfield,N.J., in 1950. Wood graduated with a B.A. from the University of Texas at Austin in 1971. She earned herJ.D., with honors, from the University of Texas School of Law in 1975.[1][2]

Professional career

Judicial career

7th Circuit Court of Appeals

Nomination Tracker
Fedbadgesmall.png
Nominee Information
Name: Diane P. Wood
Court:United States Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit
Progress
Confirmed 91 days after nomination.
ApprovedANominated: March 31, 1995
ApprovedAABA Rating:Unanimously Well Qualified
Questionnaire:
ApprovedAHearing: June 27, 1995
QFRs:(Hover over QFRs to read more)
ApprovedAReported: June 29, 1995 
ApprovedAConfirmed: June 30, 1995
ApprovedAVote: Voice vote


Wood was nominated to theSeventh Circuit Court of Appeals by PresidentBill Clinton on March 31, 1995. TheAmerican Bar Association rated WoodUnanimously Well Qualified for the nomination.[9] Hearings on Wood's nomination were held before theUnited States Senate Committee on the Judiciary on June 27, 1995, and her nomination was reported by U.S. Sen.Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) on June 29, 1995. Wood was confirmed by a voice vote in theU.S. Senate on June 30, 1995, and she received her commission the same day. Wood served aschief judge of the court from 2013 to 2020.[10][1]

Potential Supreme Court nominee

In 2008,The Washington Post reported that Judge Wood was a potential nominee for a vacancy on theU.S. Supreme Court. Journalists and pundits theorized that up to three Supreme Court justices could retire in Obama's term.[11][12]

Judge Wood was interviewed by the White House on May 4, 2010, regarding the replacement of Associate JusticeJohn Paul Stevens of the Supreme Court. Many experts viewed her as the potential front-runner to replace Stevens. During her interview, she was questioned by both President Obama and Vice President Biden.[13]

Noteworthy cases

Illinois Republican Party v. Pritzker (2020)

See also:Lawsuits about state actions and policies in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, 2020-2021

Illinois Republican Party v. Pritzker: On June 15, 2020, the Illinois Republican Party, together with three local Republican groups, filed suit against Governor J.B. Pritzker (D) in theUnited States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. In their complaint, Republicans argued that their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights had been violated because, "unlike churches, political parties are barred from gathering in groups greater than 10 under the Governor’s Executive Order 2020-38." Republicans said that "[w]hen the state grants access to one set of speakers, it must give equal access and treatment to all speakers of a similar character," contrasting their treatment to both that of churches and protesters. They have asked the court to enjoin the state from enforcing Executive Order 2020-38 against political parties. Pritzker’s spokeswoman, Jordan Abudayyeh, said, "[As] the Republicans who attended protests against the public health guidance are well aware, the State has never prevented people from exercising their First Amendment rights."[14][15]

On July 2, 2020, JudgeSara Lee Ellis, of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, denied Republicans' motion for an injunction against the gathering-size restriction (which was subsequently raised to 50 people). Republicans appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. On Sept. 3, a three-judge panel rejected the appeal, finding that precedent "does not compel the Governor to treat all gatherings alike." The panel further concluded that "free exercise of religion enjoys express constitutional protection, and the Governor was entitled to carve out some room for religion, even while he declined to do so for other activities." Finally, the court emphasized that re-subjecting religious gatherings to the mandatory cap would "leave the Republicans no better off than they are today." Chief JudgeDiane Wood and JudgesAmy St. Eve andAmy Coney Barrett sat on the panel and were unanimous in their decision.[16][17]

Daniel Suhr, counsel for the Republican Party, said in a statement, "We are disappointed in the decision, respectfully disagree with it, and are considering our options."[18]

Other cases

  • Hively v. Ivy Tech, 15-1720, (7th Cir. 2017): Wood, writing for the circuit courten banc, held that Title VII of theCivil Rights Act of 1964 (Act) prohibited discrimination in the workplace on the basis of sexual orientation. TheSeventh Circuit was the firstfederal appeals court to extend Title VII's protections to encompass discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation as a form of sex discrimination, which is prohibited explicitly under the text of the Act.
  • Walker v. O'Brien, 216 F.3d 626, (7th Cir. 2000): Wood, writing for the panel, held that the requirements of the Prison Litigation Reform Act do not apply to properly characterizedhabeas corpus actions because those actions are not “civil actions” within the meaning of the Act.
  • Fornalik v. Perryman, 223 F.3d 523, (7th Cir. 2000): Wood, writing for the panel, held that an INS district office order putting a minor alien in deferred status pending an application to proceed as an abused child of a visa recipient under the Violence Against Women Act took precedence over an earlier removal order issued by another INS district office.
  • Goldwasser v. Ameritech Corp., 222 F.3d 390 (7th Cir. 2000): Wood, writing for the panel, held that a violation of the 1996 Telecommunications Act was not sufficient to state a claim under general antitrust laws.
  • Illinois ex rel. Ryan v. Brown, 227 F.3d 1042 (7th Cir. 2000): Wood, writing for the panel, held that the State of Illinois itself, rather than taxpayer plaintiffs, was the correct party to sue under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act to recover losses stemming from a corrupt loan to public official.
  • St. John's United Church of Christ v. City of Chicago, 502 F.3d 616 (7th Cir. 2007): Wood, writing for the majority, held that the O'Hare Modernization Act’s amendment of the Illinois Religious Freedom Restoration Act did not violate the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment because it was a law of general applicability that did not target the plaintiff Church.
  • United States v. Warner & Ryan, 498 F.3d 666 (7th Cir. 2007): Wood, writing for the majority, affirmed the convictions on various criminal charges of former Illinois Governor George H. Ryan, Sr., and his associate Lawrence E. Warner.
  • Germano v. International Profit Association, 544 F.3d 798 (7th Cir. 2008). Wood, writing for the panel, held that statements transmitted by deaf individuals using a communications assistant in a telecommunications relay service conversation are not hearsay.
  • Christian Legal Society v. Walker, 453 F.3d 853 (7th Cir. 2006) (dissent). The panel majority held that the Christian Legal Society (CLS) was entitled to a preliminary injunction preventing Southern Illinois University's revocation of CLS's student group status based on the CLS's failure to adhere to the University's nondiscrimination policy. In dissent, Wood argued that CLS was not entitled to a preliminary injunction because it failed to show that it was likely to succeed on the merits and failed to demonstrate that it had a fundamental right to the benefits the University believed should have been withheld so long as CLS did not comply with the University's policy.
  • Bloch v. Frischholz, 533 F.3d 562 (7th Cir. 2008) (dissent). The panel majority held that a condominium association rule prohibiting objects outside of owners’ doors was facially neutral, and that the Fair Housing Act does not require a religious accommodation for those of Jewish faith wishing to put mezuzot on their doorposts. In dissent, Wood argued plaintiffs had established a claim for intentional religious discrimination under the Fair Housing Act, as there was sufficient evidence in the record to conclude that the rule was being applied in a way that would constitute a constructive eviction of observant Jews.
  • Solid Waste Agency v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, 191 F.3d 845 (1999): Wood, writing for the panel, held that the decision to regulate isolated waters based on their actual use as a habitat by migratory birds was within Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause. The Supreme Court reversed. 531 U.S. 159 (2001).
  • National Organization for Women v. Scheidler, 267 F.3d 687 (7th Cir. 2001): Wood, writing for the panel, held that the district court did not err in concluding that the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act authorized private plaintiffs to seek injunctive relief. In addition, the court held that the injunction issued by the district prohibiting violent conduct by anti-abortion protesters struck the proper balance and avoided any risk of curtailing activities protected by the First Amendment. The Supreme Court reversed. 537 U.S. 393 (2003).

John Doe investigations

See also:John Doe investigations related to Scott Walker

TwoJohn Doe investigations, beginning in 2010 and ending in 2015, were launched byMilwaukee County District AttorneyJohn Chisholm (D) into the activities of staff and associates of Gov.Scott Walker (R).[19] On February 10, 2014,Eric O'Keefe, a target in the second investigation, filed a federal lawsuit stating that the investigation was used as an instrument to shut down conservative speech and therefore violated the targets'First Amendment rights. The suit was filed with theU.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. Prosecutors subsequently filed an appeal with theSeventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals.[20]

During arguments, Seventh Circuit JudgeFrank Easterbrook questioned the constitutionality of the secrecy orders, stating they were “screaming with unconstitutionality.” Judge Diane Wood focused on why the suit was filed in federal court. O'Keefe's attorneys pointed to the fact that the Wisconsin Supreme Court had yet to take up the cases filed in state court.[21]

On September 24, the Seventh Circuit reversed the injunction order and dismissed the lawsuit, based on the concern that it constituted federal interference in a state case.[22][23]

Awards and associations

In 1990, Wood was named the Harold J. and Marion F. Green Chair in International Legal Studies becoming the first woman at the Law School to be honored with a named chair.

Outside of her role as a federal judge, Wood has worked on various legal reform projects. The majority of her involvement comes through theAmerican Bar Association and the Brookings Institution Project on Civil Justice Reform. Wood was instrumental in developing the University of Chicago’s first policy on sexual harassment and has become a consultant in business law as well, advising businesses on developing policies that take harassment law into account.

Judge Wood holds memberships in the American Law Institute, the International Academy of Comparative Law, the American Society of International Law, and theAmerican Bar Association. She has served on the governing councils of the ABA’s Section of Antitrust Law and its Section of International Law and Practice. Since joining the Court, she has continued to teach at The University of Chicago Law School as a Senior Lecturer.

See also

External links


Footnotes

  1. 1.01.11.21.3Federal Judicial Center, "Wood, Diane Pamela," accessed December 10, 2021
  2. 2.02.1The Indiana Lawyer, "Wood breaks gender barrier on the 7th Circuit," November 20, 2013
  3. New York Times, "Potential Justice Offers a Counterpoint in Chicago," May 11, 2009
  4. ABC News, "White House Prepares for Possibility of 2 Supreme Court Vacancies," February 4, 2010
  5. CBS News, "Obama Skewers Court--and Signals Change Ahead," January 28, 2010
  6. New York Times, "Ginsburg Has Surgery for Pancreatic Cancer," February 5, 2009
  7. Washington Post, "Ginsburg illness puts focus on Obama's choices," February 6, 2009
  8. Chicago Tribune, "Could Chicago's Judge Wood fill Ginsburg's seat if she resigns from Supreme Court?" February 8, 2009
  9. American Bar Association, "Ratings of Article III judicial nominees, 104th Congress," accessed May 31, 2016
  10. United States Congress, "PN 298 - Diane P. Wood - The Judiciary," accessed May 31, 2016
  11. Washington Post, "Predicting the Picks," October 28, 2008
  12. Chicago Sun Times, "Could Chicago's Judge Wood fill Ginsburg's seat if she resigns from Supreme Court?" February 8, 2009
  13. The Associated Press, "Obama Interviews Diane Wood for the Supreme Court," May 4, 2010
  14. United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, "Illinois Republican Party v. Pritzker: Complaint," June 15, 2020
  15. WTTW, "Illinois GOP Sues Gov. Pritzker Over Ban on Large Gatherings," June 16, 2020
  16. United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, "Illinois Republican Party v. Pritzker: Order," September 3, 2020
  17. United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, "Illinois Republican Party v. Pritzker: Opinion and Order," July 2, 2020
  18. Law360, "7th Circ. Keeps Illinois' COVID-19 Quarantine Order Afloat," September 3, 2020
  19. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin Milwaukee Division, "Eric O’Keefe, and Wisconsin Club for Growth, Inc.," accessed February 23, 2015
  20. United States Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, "Defendants'-Appellants’ Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Appeal & Memorandum in Support of Motion," May 5, 2014
  21. Wisconsin Reporter, "Wisconsin prosecutors appeal for protection from blowback in partisan probe," September 9, 2014
  22. United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit, "Eric O'Keefe and Wisconsin Club for Growth, Inc. v John T. Chisholm et al.," September 24, 2014
  23. Wisconsin Reporter, "Appeals court reverses John Doe injunction, but Wisconsin’s secret war far from over," September 24, 2014

Political offices
Preceded by
-
United States Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit
1995-2022
Succeeded by
-
US-CourtOfAppeals-7thCircuit-Seal.png
v  e
Federal judges who have served theU.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Active judges

   •  Amy St. Eve  •  Frank Easterbrook  •  John Z. Lee (United States Court of Appeals judge)  •  Michael B. Brennan (Wisconsin)  •  Michael Scudder  •  Joshua Kolar  •  Doris Pryor  •  Thomas Kirsch  •  Candace Jackson-Akiwumi  •  Nancy Maldonado  •  Rebecca Taibleson

Senior judges

Diane Sykes  •  Diane Wood  •  Daniel Manion  •  Ilana Rovner  •  David Hamilton (Seventh Circuit)  •  Kenneth Ripple  •  William Bauer  •  

Former judgesJohn Paul Stevens  •  Ann Williams (Federal judge)  •  Julian William Mack  •  Terence Evans  •  Joel Flaum  •  Michael Kanne  •  Richard Posner  •  John Coffey (Seventh Circuit)  •  Jesse Eschbach  •  Walter Quintin Gresham  •  Richard Cudahy  •  Thomas Fairchild  •  Philip Tone  •  William Allen Woods  •  James Graham Jenkins (Wisconsin)  •  William Henry Seaman  •  John William Showalter  •  Peter Stenger Grosscup  •  Christian Cecil Kohlsaat  •  Albert Barnes Anderson (federal judge)  •  Francis Elisha Baker  •  Samuel Alschuler  •  Evan Alfred Evans  •  Louis FitzHenry  •  George True Page  •  Walter Lindley  •  William Morris Sparks  •  James Earl Major  •  Walter Treanor  •  Francis Duffy  •  Otto Kerner, Sr.  •  Otto Kerner, Jr.  •  Harlington Wood  •  Winfred Knoch  •  William Parkinson (Indiana)  •  Luther Swygert  •  Sherman Minton  •  Latham Castle  •  Walter Cummings  •  Philip Finnegan  •  John Hastings  •  Roger Kiley  •  Wilbur Pell  •  Elmer Schnackenberg  •  Robert Sprecher  •  Hardress Swaim  •  Amy Coney Barrett  •  
Former Chief judges

Diane Sykes  •  Diane Wood  •  Joel Flaum  •  Richard Posner  •  William Bauer  •  Thomas Fairchild  •  William Morris Sparks  •  James Earl Major  •  Francis Duffy  •  Luther Swygert  •  Latham Castle  •  Walter Cummings  •  John Hastings  •  


Bill Clinton
v  e
Federal judges nominated byBill Clinton
1993

AdamsAmbroseBarnesBrinkemaBucklewChasanowCoffmanDaughtreyFergusonGinsburgHagenJacksonLancasterLevalLindsayMessitteMichaelPiersolSarisSchwartzSeybertShanahanShawStearnsTragerVazquezWilkenWilson

1994

BaerBarkettBattsBeatyBenavidesBennettBerriganBieryBlockBormanBreyerBrionesBrysonBuckloBurgessBurrageCabranesCalabresiCarrCasellasCastilloChatignyChinCindrichCoarCollinsCooperCoteCurrieDavisDominguezDownesDuvalFriedmanFurgesonGarciaGertnerGettlemanGillmorGilmoreGleesonHaggertyHamiltonHannahHawkinsHenryHolmesHoodHullHurleyJackJonesJonesKaplanKatzKernKesslerKoeltlLisiManningMcKeeMcLaughlinMelanconMiles-LaGrangeMooreMotzMurphyO'MalleyO'MearaOliverPaezB. ParkerF. ParkerR. ParkerPerryPonsorPoolerPorteousRendell • Riley •RobertsonRogersRossRussellSandsSarokinScheindlinSilverSquatritoStewartSullivanTatelThompsonTimlinUrbinaVanaskieVanceWallsWellsWilliams

1995

ArtertonAtlasBlackBlakeBriscoeTena CampbellTodd CampbellChesneyColeCollierDanielDavisDennisDlottDonaldDuffyEconomusEvansFallonFolsomGaughanGoodwinHeartfieldHuntIllstonJonesKingKornmannLawsonLenardLuceroLynchMcKinleyMoodyMooreMoskowitzMurphyMurthaNugentO'TooleOrlofskyPogueSessionsC. SmithO. SmithSteinThornburgTunheimWallachWardlawWebberWhaleyWinmill

Wood
1996

BroadwaterClevertFennerGershonGottschallGreenawayHinkleJonesKahnLaughreyLemmonMartenMillerMolloyMontgomeryPregersonRakoffSargusTashimaThomasZapata

1997

AdelmanBataillonBreyerCaputoCaseyChambersClayDamrellDroneyFriedmanGajarsaGarlandGilmanGoldGwinHallHaydenHullIshiiJenkinsKauffmanKennedyKimballKollar-KotellyLazzaraMarbleyMarcusMiddlebrooksMillerMoonPrattRendellSippelSiragusaSnyderThrash

1998

AikenBarbierBarzilayBermanButtramCarterCollinsDawsonDimitrouleasFletcherFogelFrankGraberHellersteinHerndonJamesJohnsonKaneKellyG. KingR. KingLasnikLeeLemelleLindsayLipezManellaMatzMcCuskeyMcKeownMcMahonMickleMollwayMordueMorenoMorrowMunleyMurphyPallmeyerPauleyPolsterPoolerRawlinsonRidgwayR. RobertsV. RobertsSackScottSeitzSeymourSheaSilvermanSleetSotomayorSteehStoryStraubTagleTarnowTraugerTraxlerTysonWardlawWhelanYoung

1999

AlsupBarryBrownBuchwaldCooperEatonEllisonFeessFisherGouldGuzmanHaynesHibblerHochbergHurdHuvelleJordanKatzmannKennellyLinnLorenzLynnMarreroMurguiaPannellPechmanPepperPhillipsSchreierStewartUnderhillWardWilliamsWilson

2000

AmbroAntoonBattaniBerzonBoltonBradyByeCavanaughDanielsDarrahDawsonDykFuentesGaraufisGarcia-GregoryHamiltonHuckHuntLawsonLefkowLynchMartinMcLaughlinMoodyMurguiaPaezPisanoPresnellRawlinsonReaganSchillerSingalSteeleSurrickSwainTallmanTeilborgTuckerWhittemore

v  e
John Doe investigations related to Scott Walker
Background
Lawsuits
State court lawsuits:Three Unnamed Petitioners v. Gregory A. PetersonEric O'Keefe, et al. vs. Wisconsin Government Accountability Board, et al.Two Unnamed Petitioners v. Gregory A. PetersonChristopher Brekken v. Bruce J. LandgrafChristopher L. Wiesmueller v. Neal NettesheimFrancis D. Schmitz v. Gregory A. PetersonCynthia Archer v. John Chisholm, et. al.Federal court lawsuits:Eric O'Keefe and Wisconsin Club for Growth, Inc. v. Francis Schmitz, et. al.Relevant rulings:McCutcheon v. Federal Election CommissionCitizens United v. Federal Election CommissionWisconsin Right to Life, Inc. v. Thomas BarlandCitizens for Responsible Government v. Wisconsin Government Accountability Board, et. al.Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.Wisconsin Coalition for Voter Participation Inc., et. al. v. State of Wisconsin Elections Board, et. al.
Prosecutors
Special prosecutor:Francis SchmitzPersonnel in Milwaukee County DA's Office:John ChisholmBruce LandgrafDavid BuddeDavid RoblesRobert StelterDistrict attorneys in the five John Doe countiesJohn ChisholmIsmael OzanneJane KohlweyLarry NelsonKurt Klomberg
Courts
Judges
Attorneys
Attorneys of JD targets:Steven BiskupicTodd Graves • Michael Bresnick •Edward MeyersDean StrangMatthew O'NeillDavid Rivkin • Andrew Grossman •Attorneys of JD prosecutors and judges:Patrick Fiedler • Samuel Leib •Randall CrockerDouglas KnottJoseph M. Russell
Supporters of JD investigations
Media
Elected Officials
Government Accountability Board
Wisconsin Government Accountability BoardCurrent board members:Gerald NicholTimothy VockeThomas CaneHarold FroehlichJohn FrankeElsa LamelasPast board members:Thomas BarlandMichael BrennanStaff:Kevin KennedyDean NickelJonathan BeckerShane Falk • Nathan Judnic • Elizabeth Blackwood • J. Douglas Haag •Vendors:Digital Intelligence
Targets of John Doe I
Prosecuted:Kelly RindfleischDarlene WinkKevin KavanaughTim RussellBrian Pierick • Wiliam Gardner •Investigated:Friends of Scott Walker • Christopher Wiesmueller •John HillerJim VillaCindy ArcherJailed by prosecutors/No charges filed:Christopher BrekkenAndrew P. Jensen, Jr.Home or office raided:Kelly RindfleischCindy ArcherDarlene WinkTim RussellBrian Pierick • Christopher Wiesmueller •Compelled to testify:R.J. Johnson
Targets of John Doe II
Individuals:Kelly RindfleischEric O'KeefeR.J. JohnsonDeborah JordahlJed SanbornCarol ValleyWilliam EisnerKeith GilkesSean HannityCharlie SykesOrganizations:Wisconsin Club for GrowthClub for GrowthWisconsin Right to LifeUnited Sportsmen of WisconsinCoalition Partners, LLCR.J. Johnson and Associates • Nonbox • TenCAPITOL •Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of CommerceAmerican Federation for ChildrenAmericans for ProsperityAmericans for Prosperity WisconsinRight Direction Wisconsin PACRepublican State Leadership Committee • Committee to Elect a Republican Senate •Wisconsin Recall Action FundJobs First CoalitionEnding Spending Action Fund • Mary Stitt & Associates •Wisconsin Manufacturers & CommerceLeague of American VotersCitizens for a Strong AmericaRepublican Party of WisconsinRepublican Governors AssociationAmerican CrossroadsWisconsin Family Action
Other