Public policy made simple. Dive into ourinformation hub today!

Ballot access requirements for political parties in South Dakota

From Ballotpedia
Public Policy Logo-one line.pngin South Dakota


Election Policy VNT Logo.png

Ballot access for major and minor party candidates
Ballot access for presidential candidates
Select a state below to learn more about ballot access requirements for candidates in that state.

Ballot access requirements for political parties in the United States
List of political parties in the United States
Ballotpedia's Election Administration Legislation Tracker
Note: This article is not intended to serve as a guide to running for public office. Individuals should contact theirstate election agencies for further information.

Although there are hundreds of political parties in the United States, only certain parties qualify to have the names of their candidates for office printed on election ballots. In order to qualify for ballot placement, a party must meet certain requirements that vary from state to state. For example, in some states, a party may have to file a petition in order to qualify for ballot placement. In other states, a party must organize around a candidate for a specific office; that candidate must, in turn, win a percentage of the vote in order for the party to be granted ballot status. In still other states, an aspiring political party must register a certain number of voters.

HIGHLIGHTS
  • As of May 2024, South Dakota officially recognized four political parties: theDemocratic,Libertarian,No Labels, andRepublican parties.
  • In some states, a candidate may choose to have a label other than that of an officially recognized party appear alongside his or her name on the ballot. Such labels are calledpolitical party designations. South Dakota does not allow candidates to use political party designations.
  • To learn more about ballot access requirements for political candidates in South Dakota, seethis article.

    DocumentIcon.jpgSeestate election laws

    Process for a political party to obtain ballot status

    Seal of South Dakota

    DocumentIcon.jpgSee statutes:Title 12, Chapter 12-5 of South Dakota Codified Law

    A political party inSouth Dakota is defined as a "party whose candidate for any statewide office received at least two and one-half percent of the total votes cast for that statewide office in either of the two previous general elections."[1]

    Party certification

    A new political party may be organized and participate in the primary election by filing a petition with the secretary of state no later than the last Tuesday of March at 5 p.m. prior to the date of the primary election.[2]

    A new political party must submit a written declaration signed by registered voters equaling at least 1 percent of the total number of votes cast for governor at the last preceding gubernatorial election. The declaration must contain the following information:[2]

    1. the name of the proposed party
    2. a brief statement of the party's principles

    Constitution and bylaws

    A political party must also adopt a constitution or a set of bylaws to govern its organization and the conduct of its affairs. The party's constitution and bylaws must not be inconsistent with laws ofSouth Dakota. The party central committee must file with thesecretary of state a copy of the document and amendments within 30 days of their approval.[3]

    Political parties

    See also:List of political parties in the United States

    As of May 2024, there were four recognized political parties inSouth Dakota.[4]

    PartyWebsite linkBylaws/platform link
    Democratic Party of South DakotaLink
    Libertarian Party of South DakotaLinkParty platform
    No LabelsLinkParty platform
    Republican Party of South DakotaLinkParty bylaws

    Noteworthy events

    2018

    HB 1286

    On March 23, 2018, GovernorDennis Daugaard (R) signed HB 1286 into law. The legislation provided the following changes to the state's ballot access laws for political parties:[5][6]

    • A party whose registration is less than 2.5 percent of the total number of registered voters receives alternative political status. A party whose registration meets or exceeds 2.5 percent of total registered voters is considered a political party and remains so for two general election cycles.
    • A new party can participate in the primary if it files a written declaration signed by at least 1 percent of the state's voters (i.e., 1 percent of the total number of votes cast for governor in the most recent gubernatorial election). The deadline for filing this declaration is the 5:00 p.m. on the last Tuesday in March prior to the primary.

    On March 8, 2018, theSouth Dakota House of Representatives voted 59 to 5 to approve HB 1286. TheSouth Dakota State Senate followed suit that same day, voting unanimously to approve the legislation.

    HB 1012

    On March 21, 2018, GovernorDennis Daugaard (R) signed HB 1012 into law. The legislation defined a political party as "a party whose candidate for any statewide office received at least two and one-half percent of the total votes cast for that statewide office in either of the two previous general elections." Previously, a political party was required to meet this requirement in each general election cycle. The legislation took immediate effect upon being signed into law. The legislation cleared the South Dakota State Senate on February 27, 2018, by a unanimous vote. The South Dakota House of Representatives approved the legislation by a unanimous vote on January 30, 2018.[7]

    Libertarian Party of South Dakota v. Shantel Krebs

    On February 21, 2018, United States District JudgeLawrence Piersol issued his ruling inLibertarian Party of South Dakota v. Shantel Krebs, striking down, among others, the following state statutes:[8]

    • 12-5-1: Establishing that a political party can participate in the primary if it files a written declaration containing signatures from at least 2.5 percent of the state's total voters (i.e., the total number of votes cast for governor in the most recent gubernatorial election).[9]
    • 12-6-4: Establishing that a candidate for office cannot have his or her name printed on a party's primary ballot unless a petition has been filed on that person's behalf by 5:00 p.m. on the last Tuesday in March preceding the primary.[10]

    Piersol wrote the following in his opinion:[8]

    Where restrictions on access to the ballot are involved, states must adopt the least restrictive means to achieve their ends and the state's interests must be considered in light of the significant role third parties have played in the political history of this country. The Court finds that the Defendants did not meet their burden of showing that the substantially burdensome ballot access provisions challenged by Plaintiffs are narrowly tailored to serve a compelling state interest. Further, the ballot access law at issue disadvantages one group over another so as to result in an unequal treatment which is not justified by a compelling interest.[11]

    2015 and 2016

    SB 69

    See also:South Dakota Independent Candidates Election Law Referendum, Referred Law 19 (2016)

    On March 13, 2015, theSouth Dakota State Legislature approved SB 69. The legislation included the following provisions:[12]

    1. The bill moved the filing deadline for newly qualifying political parties from the last Tuesday in March to the first Tuesday in March.
    2. The bill prohibited registered party members from signing the nominating petitions of independent candidates.
    3. The bill permitted the candidates of small ballot-qualified parties to access the primary ballot via one of the two following methods:
      1. obtaining signatures from 250 party members
      2. obtaining signatures from 1 percent of registered independent voters
    4. The bill raised the primary ballot signature requirement for candidates of large ballot-qualified parties from 1 percent of the party's previous gubernatorial general election vote to 1 percent of the party's total registered members.

    On March 20, 2015,Governor Dennis Daugaard signed the bill into law.[12][13]

    The American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) and other groups began circulating petitions in March 2015 to subject SB 69 to aveto referendum. According toBallot Access News, the "AFL-CIO is mostly interested in fighting SB 69 because it has a disproportionate effect on Democrats who want to run in the Democratic primary. SB 69 increased their primary petitions from 1 percent of the last vote for their party nominee for governor to 1 percent of the registered voters in that party." The bill was struck down viaveto referendum on November 8, 2016.[14]

    Explore election legislation with Ballotpedia

    • Try Ballotpedia's Election Administration Legislation Tracker
      Try Ballotpedia's Election Administration Legislation Tracker
      Ballotpedia's Election Administration Legislation Tracker provides daily updates on legislative activity related to election policy in all 50 states.

      Our election policy experts translate complex bill text into easy-to-understand summaries. And because it's from Ballotpedia, our legislation tracker is guaranteed to be neutral, unbiased, and nonpartisan.
    • Read Ballotpedia's State of Election Administration Legislation Reports
      Read Ballotpedia's State of Election Administration Legislation Reports
      Ballotpedia publishes regular analysis of election administration legislation, including three full reports per year, providing ongoing coverage of legislative activity affecting election policy in each state.

      These reports deliver insights into partisan priorities, dive deep into notable trends, and highlight activity in key states.
    • Subscribe to The Ballot Bulletin

      Subscribe to The Ballot Bulletin
      The Ballot Bulletin is a weekly email that delivers the latest updates on election policy.

      The newsletter tracks developments in election policy around the country, including legislative activity, big-picture trends, and recent news. Each email contains in-depth data from our Election Administration Legislation Tracker.


    See also

    Influencer Project Badge.png

    External links

    Footnotes

    1. South Dakota Codified Law, "Title 12-1-3(10)," accessed July 10, 2025
    2. 2.02.1South Dakota Codified Law, "Title 12-5-1," accessed July 10, 2025
    3. South Dakota Codified Law, "Title 12-5-1.1," accessed July 10, 2025
    4. South Dakota Secretary of State, "Recognized Political Parties," accessed May 23, 2024
    5. South Dakota Legislature, "House Bill 1286," accessed March 22, 2018
    6. Ballot Access News, "South Dakota Governor Signs Bill that Improves Ballot Access for Small Qualified Parties," March 23, 2018
    7. South Dakota Legislature, "House Bill 1012," accessed March 22, 2018
    8. 8.08.1United States District Court for the District of South Dakota, "Libertarian Party of South Dakota v. Shantel Krebs: Memorandum Opinion and Order," February 21, 2018
    9. South Dakota Codified Laws, "Section 12-5-1," accessed February 22, 2018
    10. South Dakota Codified Laws, "Section 12-6-4," accessed February 22, 2018
    11. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
    12. 12.012.1Ballot Access News, "South Dakota Legislature Passes Bill Making Ballot Access Worse," March 16, 2015
    13. Ballot Access News, "South Dakota Governor Signs Bill that Injures Ballot Access," March 20, 2015
    14. Ballot Access News, "South Dakota Referendum Petition, to Overturn Bad New Ballot Access Law, Begins to Circulate," April 21, 2015
    v  e
    Election policy
    Voting policyElection Policy on Ballotpedia Logo.png
    Ballot access for state and federal candidates
    Ballot access for political parties
    Ballot access for presidential candidates
    Redistricting
    Flag of South Dakota
    v  e
    State ofSouth Dakota
    Pierre (capital)
    Elections

    What's on my ballot? |Elections in 2025 |How to vote |How to run for office |Ballot measures

    Government

    Who represents me? |U.S. President |U.S. Congress |Federal courts |State executives |State legislature |State and local courts |Counties |Cities |School districts |Public policy

    Ballotpedia
    Editorial Content
    Josh Altic, Director of ContentDaniel Anderson, Associate Director of Elections & DataCory Eucalitto, Associate Director of FeaturesRyan Byrne, Managing Editor of Ballot MeasuresMandy McConnell, Managing Editor of NewsDoug Kronaizl, Managing Editor of Local ExpansionAbbey Smith, Managing Editor of ElectionsJanie Valentine, Managing Editor of LawJoel Williams, Managing Editor of EventsAndrew BahlJaclyn BeranMarielle BrickerJoseph BrusgardEmma BurlingameKelly CoyleJon DunnVictoria EdwardsThomas EllisNicole FisherJoseph GreaneyThomas GrobbenBrianna HoseaMolly KehoeTyler KingGlorie MartinezNorm Leahy, Senior EditorNathan MaxwellJimmy McAllisterBrandon McCauleyEllie MikusEllen MorrisseyMackenzie MurphyKaley PlatekSamantha PostAdam PowellAnnelise ReinwaldEthan RiceSpencer RichardsonVictoria RoseBriana RyanMyj SaintylMaddy SaluckaEmma SoukupAlexis ThackerMina VogelSamuel WonacottTrenton Woodcox