Public policy made simple. Dive into ourinformation hub today!

2016 presidential candidates on rural policy

From Ballotpedia



Presidential Elections-2016-badge.png

2016 Presidential Election
Date:November 8, 2016

Candidates
Winner:Donald Trump (R)
Hillary Clinton (D) •Jill Stein (G) •Gary Johnson (L) •Vice presidential candidates

Election coverage
Important datesNominating processBallotpedia's 2016 Battleground PollPollsDebatesPresidential election by stateRatings and scorecards

Ballotpedia's presidential election coverage
2028202420202016

Have you subscribed yet?

Join the hundreds of thousands of readers trusting Ballotpedia to keep them up to date with the latest political news. Sign up for the Daily Brew.
Click here to learn more.


This page was current as of the 2016 election.

See below what the2016 presidential candidates and their respective party platforms said about rural policy.

Interested in reading more? Ballotpedia also covered what the candidates said aboutenergy and environmental policy,agriculture and food policy,climate change,labor and employment, andbudgets.

OVERVIEW OF CANDIDATE POSITIONS
  • Hillary Clinton's plan to strengthen rural communities included encouraging investment in rural small businesses through simplified regulations for community banks, improving infrastructure, and expanding development tax credits. Clinton also called for increasing funding for new farmers, promoting clean energy leadership, and improving educational opportunities.
  • Donald Trump supported the Renewable Fuel Standard and criticized theBureau of Land Management's regulation of public lands.
  • Jill Stein expressed support for the ethical treatment of farm animals and sustainable and local agriculture.
  • Gary Johnson expressed support for a free market approach to energy production and supported an agriculture stewardship grant program while governor or New Mexico.
  • Democratic candidate

    Democratic Party Hillary Clinton

    caption
    • Hillary Clinton unveiled her plan to support coal-dependent communities on November 12, 2015. She proposed repurposing mine lands and power plant sites for forestry, agriculture, and manufacturing; electrifying dams on federal land; and supporting local food and agriculture businesses in Central Appalachia.[1]
    • On August 26, 2015, Clinton introduced her plan to strengthen rural communities with a speech inIowa and a corresponding white paper on her website.[2][3][4] Her proposal included the following actions:
      • Increase the number of Rural Business Investment Companies to develop more jobs and build "capital networks."[3]
      • Simplify regulations for community banks in rural areas to facilitate the funding of small businesses.[3]
      • Increase access to high-speed broadband technology.[3]
      • Permanently establish and expand the New Markets Tax Credit, which "was designed to increase the flow of capital to businesses and low income communities by providing a modest tax incentive to private investors."[3][5]
      • StrengthenU.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) grant programs, like the USDA StrikeForce Initiative, increasing their flexibility and ability to target rural development programs.[3]
      • Double funding for the Beginning Farmer and Rancher Development program and work to decrease student debt through theNew College Compact.[3]
      • Double funding for the Farmers Market Promotion Program and the Local Food Promotion Program to strengthen local food systems.
      • Improve the targeted distribution of federal resources for disaster assistance.[3]
      • Enact comprehensive immigration reform that acknowledges the contribution of immigrants and migrant workers to agriculture.[3]
      • Fully fund the Environmental Quality Incentive Programs and initiatives like the Regional Conservation Partnership Program.[3]
      • Strengthen the Renewable Fuel Standard.[3]
      • Encourage the installation of 500 million solar panels and the production of sufficient clean renewable energy to power every home in the U.S. within a decade through the Clean Energy Challenge.[3]
      • Double funding for Early Head Start to increase access to preschool education for rural children.[3]
      • Improve access to healthcare through telemedicine and rural health clinics.[3]
    • Clinton voted in favor ofan amendment to HR 2419 - Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008, that would have limited the amount of subsidies that married couples deriving a portion of their income from farming or related activities could receive.[6]
    The 2016 Democratic Party Platform on rural policy
    Investing in Rural America

    We will work to build a stronger rural and agricultural economy. Democrats will increasefunding to support the next generation of farmers and ranchers, with particular attention given topromoting environmentally sustainable agricultural practices. We will encourage programs toprotect and enhance family farms, a cherished way of life for millions of Americans. We willexpand local food markets and regional food systems and provide a focused safety net to assistfamily operations that need support during challenging times. And we will promote clean energyleadership and collaborative stewardship of our natural resources, while expanding opportunitiesin rural communities across America. While the EPA’s new Agricultural Worker ProtectionStandard goes a long way to protect farmworkers from harmful pesticides and herbicides, werecognize there is a lot more we can do. The Democratic Party supports stronger agriculturalworker protections including regulation of work hours, elimination of child labor, ensuringadequate housing for migrant workers, and sanitary facilities in the field.

    Democrats will spur investment to power the rural economy. We support strengthening ruralwater, sewer, and broadband infrastructure to make rural businesses more competitive. We willexpand access to equity capital for businesses and expand the New Markets Tax Credit to betterserve rural small businesses. We will promote collaborative stewardship of our natural resources,while developing clean fuels that will grow our economy, lower our energy bills, combat climatechange, and make America the clean energy superpower of the 21st century. We will provideassistance to producers who conserve and improve natural resources on their farms and doubleloan guarantees that support the bio-based economy’s dynamic growth.[9]

    —2016 Democratic Party Platform[10]

    Republican candidate

    Republican Party Donald Trump

    caption
    • Speaking at the Iowa Renewable Fuels Summit on January 19, 2016,Donald Trump expressed support for the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), saying, "I will encourage Congress to be cautious in attempting to change any part of the RFS. Energy independence is a requirement if America is to become great again."[11]
    • On January 7, 2016, Trump wrote an op-ed inThe Reno Gazette-Journal to criticize the Bureau of Land Management's control of significant portions of Nevada's land. He wrote, "In the rural areas, those who for decades have had access to public lands for ranching, mining, logging and energy development are forced to deal with arbitrary and capricious rules that are influenced by special interests that profit from the D.C. rule-making and who fill the campaign coffers of Washington politicians."[12]
    • In an October 2015 interview, Trump said "eminent domain is wonderful" because of the economic opportunities it creates. He explained, "If you have a factory, where you have thousands of jobs, you need eminent domain, it’s called economic development. Now you’re employing thousands of people and you’re able to build a factory, you’re able to build an Apple computer center, where thousands of people can work. You can do that, or you can say, 'Let the man have his house.'”[13]
    • As part of his plan to reform the Veterans Administration (VA) in October 2015, Trump stated he would "embed satellite VA clinics within hospitals and other care facilities in rural and other underserved areas. This step will ensure veterans have easy access to care and local hospitals and care facilities can handle the influx of patients without backlogs while tapping the specialized knowledge of VA health specialists."[14]
    • Read more of Donald Trump's public statements on 2016 campaign issues.
    The 2016 Republican Party Platform on rural policy
    Building the Future: Technology

    The digital revolution has transformed how we work, learn, sell, shop, socialize — in short, how we live.

    ...

    Government must keep pace with the technologydeployed in the private sector. There is an urgentneed to modernize the federal government’slegacy systems and to recruit the skilled technicalpersonnel who can advance the adoption of innovationin the public sector. At the cost of billions, thecurrent Administration has done little to advanceour goal of universal broadband coverage. Thathurts rural America, where farmers, ranchers, andsmall business people need connectivity to operatein real time with the world’s producers. Almost tenmillion Americans have given up wired broadbandconnections in just the last two years alone, and millionsmore have never been connected in the firstplace.

    We encourage public-private partnerships toprovide predictable support for connecting rural areas so that every American can fully participatein the global economy.[9]

    —2016 Republican Party Platform[15]

    Green candidate

    Green Party Jill Stein

    Jill-Stein-circle.png
    • In its 2016 party platform, the Green Party advocated for the humane treatment of animals. Stein tweeted about her support for protecting farm animals from abuse on May 7, 2016. She wrote, "We must end the abuse of animals, including farm animals, & strengthen our enforcement of existing laws."[16]
    • On May 5, 2016, Stein expressed support for sustainable agriculture. She tweeted, "We must practice agriculture that replenishes the soil; move to an energy efficient economy; & live in ways that respect natural systems."[17]
    • Read more of Jill Stein's public statements on 2016 campaign issues.
    The 2016 Green Party Platform on rural policy
    G. Land Use

    OUR POSITION

    Land use policies must promote sustainable development and respect ecology.

    Unlimited growth on a finite planet cannot be sustained.

    There is a fundamental difference between growth and development and between quantity and quality. Rather than exploiting the Earth for short-term gain, Greens believe in living in sustainable balance with it. Land use practices must be founded on stewardship of the Earth, to honor the interconnected and interdependent nature of all life, to respect ecosystems and other species, while at the same time providing for human needs in a responsible and sustainable way.

    Only an economics that is based upon environmental health is sustainable.

    GREEN SOLUTIONS

    Land ownership and property rights

    1. Insist that every property right has an implied responsibility to provide for the common good of people, places and the planet.

    2. Encourage the formation and operation of cooperatives, non-profits, land trusts, co-housing, and other forms of communal and public interest management of land and resources.

    ...

    Rural land use

    8. Preserve and expand rural land use patterns that promote open space, healthy ecosystems, wildlife corridors and the ecologically sustainable agriculture. Protect and expand large continuous tracts of public and private land for wildlife habitat and biological diversity, to permit healthy, self-managing wildlife populations to exist in a natural state, and to promote complete ecosystems.

    9. Promote livable rural communities to minimize urban migration.

    10. Transition rural communities into sustainable relationships with ranching, agriculture, forestry and mining.

    11. Reward farmers and ranchers for the ecosystem services they provide on private and public lands. Favor policies that promote mall-scale farmers and ranchers over large-scale corporate agriculture and ranching.

    ...

    I. Agriculture

    Food is a necessity and a fundamental human right. All people have a right to adequate, safe, nutritional and high quality food; and those who grow it have a right to a fair return for their labor.

    Our current food system is dominated by centralized agribusiness and unsustainable practices that threaten our food security, degrade the environment, destroy communities, and squeeze out family farmers. Our so-called cheap food comes at the expense of the exploitation of our farmers along with the oppression of third world peoples, inhumane treatment of animals, pollution of air and water, and degradation of our land.

    The agricultural system for the 21st Century must provide a high quality of life for farmers, nutritious and safe food for consumers, and reward farming methods that enhance the quality of water, soil, and air, and the beauty of the landscape.

    According to the 2006 United Nations "Livestock's Long Shadow" report and the World Watch Institute's 2009 article "Livestock and Climate Change," the livestock sector is one of the most significant contributors to our most serious environmental problems, including global warming, land degradation, air and water pollution, and loss of biodiversity.

    1. We encourage legislation that assists new farmers and ranchers, that promotes widespread ownership to small and medium-sized farms and ranches, and that revitalizes and repopulates rural communities and promotes sustainable development and stewardship.

    2. We support new farming and growing opportunities and urge the inclusion of non-traditional crops and foods in farm programs.

    3. We advocate regionalizing our food system and decentralizing agriculture lands, production, and distribution. We encourage public support for producer and consumer cooperatives, community kitchens, Community Supported Agriculture, urban agriculture, and community farms and gardens.

    4. We advocate the creation of a Food Policy Council composed of farmers, including small farmers and consumers, to oversee the USDA and all food policies at the local, state, and national level. This council should adjudicate conflicts of interest that arise when industries police themselves.

    5. We support the highest organic standards (California Organic Certification Standards, for example). We advocate shifting price supports and government subsidies to organic food products so that they will be competitive with chemically produced food. We believe that everyone, not just the wealthy, must be able to afford safe and healthy food.

    6. We urge the banning of sewage sludge or hazardous wastes as fertilizer, and of irradiation and the use of genetic engineering in all food production.

    7. We would phase-out man-made pesticides and artificial fertilizers. We support Integrated Pest Management techniques as an alternative to chemical-based agriculture.

    8. Food prices ought to reflect the true cost of food, including the health effects of eating processed foods, antibiotic resistance, pesticide effects on growers and consumers, soil erosion, water pollution, pesticide drift, and air pollution. Indirect costs (loss of rural communities, a heavily subsidized transportation system, cost of the military necessary to defend cheap oil, and reduced security), though more difficult to calculate, should be factored into the cost of our highly centralized food system.

    9. World hunger can best be addressed by food security—being self-sufficient for basic needs. Overpopulation is largely a consequence, not simply a cause, of poverty and environmental destruction, and all remedial actions must address living standards and food security through sustainable production.

    10. Because of the tremendous amount of energy used in agriculture, we support farm subsidies to encourage the transition from dirty fuels to clean renewable energy as one of the most effective ways to move our country to a sustainable future.

    11. We support legislation that provides energy and fuel conservation through rotational grazing, cover-crop rotations, nitrogen-fixing systems, and fuel-free, clean renewable energy development on the farm.

    12. We encourage states to promote net-metering to make decentralized energy production economically viable.

    13. Animal farming must be practiced in ethically and environmentally sustainable ways. We support a rapid phase out of confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs) not only because of their adverse impact on the environment, but also on food safety (e.g. disease epidemics), public health, and animal protection.

    14. Applying the Precautionary Principle to genetically modified organisms (GMOs), we support a moratorium until safety can be demonstrated by independent (non-corporate funded), long-term tests for food safety, genetic drift, resistance, soil health, effects on non-target organisms, and cumulative interactions.

    15. Most importantly, we support the growing international demand to eliminate patent rights for genetic material, life forms, gene-splicing techniques, and bio-chemicals derived from them. This position is defined by the Treaty to Share the Genetic Commons, which is available through the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy. The implications of corporate takeover and the resulting monopolization of genetic intellectual property by the bioengineering industry are immense.

    16. We support mandatory, full-disclosure food and fiber labeling. A consumer has the right to know the contents in their food and fiber, how they were produced, and where they come from. Labels should address the presence of GMOs, use of irradiation, pesticide application (in production, transport, storage, and retail), and the country of origin.

    17. We support the restoration of farmlands to black families who have been discriminated against and who have lost, or are about to lose, their farms as a result. Greens will work for a meaningful remedy to restore black farmers' unencumbered ownership of their land.[9]

    —2016 Green Party Platform[18]

    Libertarian candidate

    Libertarian Party Gary Johnson

    Gary-Johnson-(New Mexico)-circle.png
    • In late August 2011, David Baucom ofThe Objective Standard interviewed Gary Johnson in New Hampshire. Baucom asked, "Americans need an abundance of energy to fuel their industrial and high-tech lives. But the U.S. government is increasingly thwarting the production of energy by regulating the coal, oil, and nuclear industries. What, in your view, is the road to a future of abundant energy? And, as president, what will you do to put America on that road?" Johnson responded, "Well, the key being free market approaches to energy, period. And the government could in fact very much accommodate that free market road to energy. So in this case, removing the uncertainty when it comes to cap and trade, carbon emissions, when it comes to coal, a free market approach to nuclear energy. I don’t know [that] any new nuclear plant gets built, given [that] no one’s going to underwrite the liability. A free market approach to oil, allowing us to responsibly drill for oil in our own geographic boundaries. You know, in a fifteen-year period, it’s possible we would be able to produce 50 percent of what we consume. That’s significant. But we should be pursuing that. And when it comes to wind and solar and biofuel (and I don’t include ethanol in biofuel), there’s a lot of exciting possibility out there. Government has stepped in; it’s subsidized that production. We’ve made a big bet when it comes to this “green space,” I call it. But the assumption, or the presumption, of our investment in the green space is that every five years, the green space becomes 100 percent more efficient. That’s not happening. But if it were to happen, in fifteen years we could be looking at the green space providing 15 percent of our energy needs, which is not insignificant. But, obviously, it needs to be a balanced approach when it comes to energy, and, in my opinion, free-market-based."
      • Baucom followed up by asking Johnson what he thought about ethanol. Johnson replied, "I think it takes more energy to produce ethanol than what it produces. So I would not be in favor of continuing ethanol subsidies."[19]
    • In August 2001, while governor of New Mexico, Johnson signed a resolution in support of a national block grant program for agricultural stewardship. In 2002, Congress approved the program under which the U.S. Department of Agriculture provides states with grant money to "address threats to soil, air, water, and wildlife."[20]
    • Read more of Gary Johnson's public statements on 2016 campaign issues.
    The 2016 Libertarian Party Platform on rural policy
    2.2 Environment

    Competitive free markets and property rights stimulate the technological innovations and behavioral changes required to protect our environment and ecosystems. Private landowners and conservation groups have a vested interest in maintaining natural resources. Governments are unaccountable for damage done to our environment and have a terrible track record when it comes to environmental protection. Protecting the environment requires a clear definition and enforcement of individual rights and responsibilities regarding resources like land, water, air, and wildlife. Where damages can be proven and quantified in a court of law, restitution to the injured parties must be required.

    2.3 Energy and Resources

    While energy is needed to fuel a modern society, government should not be subsidizing any particular form of energy. We oppose all government control of energy pricing, allocation, and production.[9]

    —2016 Libertarian Party Platform[21]

    Withdrawn candidates

    Recent news

    The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms2016 presidential candidates on rural policy. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

    See also

    Footnotes

    1. Hillary Clinton for President, "Hillary Clinton’s Plan for Revitalizing Coal Communities," November 12, 2015
    2. The Des Moines Register, "Clinton seeks to spark investment in rural America," August 28, 2015
    3. 3.003.013.023.033.043.053.063.073.083.093.103.113.123.13TIME, "Hillary Clinton Calls For Greater Investment in Rural America," August 26, 2015
    4. Hillary Clinton for President, "Hillary Clinton’s Plan for a Vibrant Rural America," August 26, 2015
    5. New Markets Tax Credit Coalition, "New Markets Tax Credit Fact Sheet," accessed January 20, 2016
    6. Congress.gov, "Senate: Text of Amendments," November 17, 2007
    7. Senate.gov, "Roll Call for H.R. 2744 Conference Report," accessed January 13, 2016
    8. Congress.gov, "S.Amdt.3617 to H.R.4939," accessed January 13, 2016
    9. 9.09.19.29.3Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
    10. Democratic Party, "The 2016 Democratic Party Platform," accessed August 23, 2016
    11. Agriculture.com, "Trump Expresses Support for RFS, Biofuel Industry," January 19, 2016
    12. The Reno Gazette-Journal, "Trump: Nevada, US need a president who obeys rule of law," January 7, 2016
    13. National Review, "Donald Trump: ‘Eminent Domain Is Wonderful.'" October 7, 2015
    14. Donald Trump for President, "Veterans Administration Reforms That Will Make America Great Again," accessed January 19, 2016
    15. GOP.com, "Republican Platform 2016," July 18, 2016
    16. Twitter, "Dr. Jill Stein," May 7, 2016
    17. Twitter, "Dr. Jill Stein," May 5, 2016
    18. The Green Party of the United States, "Platform," August 6, 2016
    19. The Objective Standard, "An Interview with Governor Gary Johnson on What He Would Do as President," Fall 2011
    20. The Fence Post, "Ag politics: Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson takes stances on GMOs, Farm Bill and immigration," June 7, 2016
    21. Libertarian Party, "Libertarian Party Platform," May 27, 2016
    v  e
    2016 United States Presidential Election
    OverviewsPresidential Elections-2016-badge.png
    Candidate profiles
    Path to the presidency
    Policy positions
    On the campaign trail
    Ballotpedia's battleground poll • Campaign preparations • Political and leadership attributes •Presidential campaign trackers and opposition researchers
    Campaign staff
    Debates
    Analysis
    The media's coverage of Donald TrumpThe media's coverage of Hillary Clinton

    Post-debate analysis overview
    Democratic:April 14, 2016 (CNN)March 9, 2016 (Univision)March 6, 2016 (CNN)February 11, 2016 (PBS)February 4, 2016 (MSNBC)January 17, 2016 (NBC)December 19, 2015 (ABC)November 14, 2015 (CBS)October 13, 2015 (CNN)
    Republican:March 10, 2016 (CNN)March 3, 2016 (FNC)February 25, 2016 (CNN)February 13, 2016 (CBS)February 6, 2016 (ABC)January 28, 2016 (FNC)January 14, 2016 (FBN)December 15, 2015 (CNN)November 10, 2015 (FBN)October 28, 2015 (CNBC)September 16, 2015 (CNN)

    Insiders Poll: First Democratic debate (October 13, 2015)Presidential Nominating Index: Clinton remains choice of Democratic InsidersPresidential Nominating Index: Bush remains choice of Republican InsidersInsiders Poll: Winners and losers from the Fox News Republican Debate
    Ballotpedia
    Editorial Content
    Josh Altic, Director of ContentDaniel Anderson, Associate Director of Elections & DataCory Eucalitto, Associate Director of FeaturesRyan Byrne, Managing Editor of Ballot MeasuresMandy McConnell, Managing Editor of NewsDoug Kronaizl, Managing Editor of Local ExpansionAbbey Smith, Managing Editor of ElectionsJanie Valentine, Managing Editor of LawJoel Williams, Managing Editor of EventsAndrew BahlJaclyn BeranMarielle BrickerJoseph BrusgardEmma BurlingameKelly CoyleJon DunnVictoria EdwardsThomas EllisNicole FisherJoseph GreaneyThomas GrobbenBrianna HoseaMolly KehoeTyler KingGlorie MartinezNorm Leahy, Senior EditorNathan MaxwellJimmy McAllisterBrandon McCauleyEllie MikusEllen MorrisseyMackenzie MurphyKaley PlatekSamantha PostAdam PowellAnnelise ReinwaldEthan RiceSpencer RichardsonVictoria RoseBriana RyanMyj SaintylMaddy SaluckaEmma SoukupAlexis ThackerMina VogelSamuel WonacottTrenton Woodcox