Election law changes? Our legislation tracker’s got you.Check it out!

2016 presidential candidates on national security

From Ballotpedia



Presidential Elections-2016-badge.png

2016 Presidential Election
Date:November 8, 2016

Candidates
Winner:Donald Trump (R)
Hillary Clinton (D) •Jill Stein (G) •Gary Johnson (L) •Vice presidential candidates

Election coverage
Important datesNominating processBallotpedia's 2016 Battleground PollPollsDebatesPresidential election by stateRatings and scorecards

Ballotpedia's presidential election coverage
2028202420202016

Have you subscribed yet?

Join the hundreds of thousands of readers trusting Ballotpedia to keep them up to date with the latest political news. Sign up for the Daily Brew.
Click here to learn more.


This page was current as of the 2016 election.

See what the2016 candidates and their respective party platforms said about national security below.

Interested in reading more about the 2016 candidates' stances on issues related to national security?
Ballotpedia also covered what the candidates said aboutforeign affairs,the Iran nuclear deal,ISIS and terrorism, andSyrian refugees.

Democratic ticket

Democratic Party Hillary Clinton

caption
  • On September 27, 2016,The Washington Free Beacon published audio ofHillary Clinton discussing the U.S. nuclear weapons program during a private fundraiser in February, in which she said she would be “inclined” to cancel an upgrade of the Long Range Stand-Off missile program. “The last thing we need are sophisticated cruise missiles that are nuclear armed,” she said.[1]
  • On September 7, 2016, Clinton participated in a forum hosted by Matt Lauer on NBC News focused on national security and foreign policy. She made the following comments about military interventions in the Middle East and theIran nuclear agreement:[2]
    • On supporting military action in Iraq, Clinton said, “Look, I think that the decision to go to war in Iraq was a mistake. And I have said that my voting to give President Bush that authority was, from my perspective, my mistake. I also believe that it is imperative that we learn from the mistakes, like after- action reports are supposed to do, and so we must learn what led us down that path so that it never happens again. I think I’m in the best possible position to be able to understand that and prevent it.”
    • Discussing support for military action in Libya, Clinton said, “With respect to Libya, again, there’s no difference between my opponent and myself. He’s on record extensively supporting intervention in Libya, when Gadhafi was threatening to massacre his population. I put together a coalition that included NATO, included the Arab League, and we were able to save lives. We did not lose a single American in that action. And I think taking that action was the right decision. Not taking it, and permitting there to be an ongoing civil war in Libya, would have been as dangerous and threatening as what we are now seeing in Syria.”
    • Asked whether Iran should be trusted, Clinton said, “On the nuclear issue, no. I think we have enough insight into what they’re doing to be able to say we have to distrust but verify. What I am focused on is all the other malicious activities of the Iranians — ballistic missiles, support for terrorists, being involved in Syria, Yemen, and other places, supporting Hezbollah, Hamas.”
  • On July 25, 2016, during a speech at the V.F.W. Convention in Charlotte, North Carolina, Clinton contrasted her approach to national security toDonald Trump’s without actually naming him. She said, “I believe in standing with our allies. Generations of American troops fought and died to secure those bonds. They knew we were safer with more friends and partners. … You will never hear me say I will only listen to myself on national security. … One thing you will never hear from me: praise for dictators and strongmen who have no love for America.” Clinton also said that she would never “order troops to commit war crimes,” as Trump suggested he would by reinstituting waterboarding and targeting families of suspected terrorists.[3]
  • Read more of Hillary Clinton's public statements on national security.
The 2016 Democratic Party Platform on national security
Confront Global Threats

Democrats will protect our country. We will strengthen our homeland security, deal wisely and firmly with those who seek to imperil America or our partners, deter aggression, and promote peace. We will use all the tools of American power, especially diplomacy and development, to confront global threats and ensure war is the last resort.

Terrorism
We must defeat ISIS, al Qaeda, and their affiliates, and prevent other groups from emerging in their place. Democrats will continue to lead a broad coalition of allies and partners to destroy ISIS’ stronghold in Iraq and Syria. We will press those in the region, especially the Gulf countries and local forces on the ground, to carry their weight in prosecuting this fight. We will dismantle the global network of terror, which supplies terrorists with money, arms, and fighters, and stop them from recruiting and inspiring potential radicals. We will improve our intelligence capabilities, with appropriate safeguards here at home, and ensure that the intelligence community and law enforcement is prepared to deal effectively with the threats we face. We will harden our defenses as well as those of our partners against external and homegrown threats. We will secure the homeland, investing more resources to improve mass transit, aviation, infrastructure, and port security. And we will remain a resilient nation, always coming together to stand up to terror.

Democrats will seek an updated Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) that is more precise about our efforts to defeat ISIS and that does not involve large-scale combat deployment of American troops.

As we prosecute the fight against terrorism, Democrats will repudiate vile tactics that would do us harm. We reject Donald Trump’s vilification of Muslims. It violates the religious freedom that is the bedrock of our country and feeds into ISIS’ nefarious narrative. It also alienates people and countries who are crucial to defeating terrorism; the vast majority of Muslims believe in a future of peace and tolerance. We reject Donald Trump’s suggestion that our military should engage in war crimes, like torturing prisoners or murdering civilian family members of suspected terrorists.

These tactics run counter to American principles, undermine our moral standing, cost innocent lives, and endanger Americans. We also firmly reject Donald Trump’s willingness to mire tens of thousands of our combat troops in another misguided ground war in the Middle East, which would only further embolden ISIS. There is nothing smart or strong about such an approach.

Syria
The Syrian crisis is heartbreaking and dangerous, and its impact is threatening the region, Europe, and beyond. Donald Trump would inflame the conflict by alienating our allies, inexplicably allowing ISIS to expand in Syria, and potentially starting a wider war. This is a reckless approach. Democrats will instead root out ISIS and other terrorist groups and bring together the moderate Syrian opposition, international community, and our regional allies to reach a negotiated political transition that ends Assad’s rule. Given the immense scale of human suffering in Syria, it is also imperative that we lead the international community in providing greater humanitarian assistance to the civilian victims of war in Syria and Iraq, especially displaced refugees.

Afghanistan
In Afghanistan, we will work with the NATO-led coalition of partners to bolster the democratically-elected government as it assumes a primary role in tackling terrorism, forges amore secure future for the country, and safeguards advances, like securing women’s rights. Democrats will continue to push for an Afghan-led peace process and press both Afghanistan and Pakistan to deny terrorists sanctuary on either side of the border. We support President Obama’s decision to maintain a limited troop presence in Afghanistan into 2017 and ensure that Afghanistan never again serves as a haven for terrorists to plan and launch attacks on our homeland.

Iran
We support the nuclear agreement with Iran because, as it is vigorously enforced and implemented, it verifiably cuts off all of Iran’s pathways to a bomb without resorting to war. We reject Donald Trump’s view that we should have walked away from a deal that peacefully dismantles Iran’s nuclear program. We will continue the work of this administration to ensure that Iran never acquires a nuclear weapon and will not hesitate to take military action if Iran races towards one.

Democrats will also address the detrimental role Iran plays in the region and will robustly enforce and, if necessary, strengthen non-nuclear sanctions. Iran is the leading state sponsor of terrorism. It violates the human rights of its population, denies the Holocaust, vows to eliminate Israel, and has its fingerprints on almost every conflict in the Middle East. Democrats will push back against Iran’s destabilizing activities including its support for terrorist groups like Hamas and Hezbollah, counter Iran’s ballistic missile program, bolster the capabilities of our Gulf partners, and ensure that Israel always has the ability to defend itself. Finally, Democrats recognize that the Iranian people seek a brighter future for their country and greater engagement with the international community. We will embrace opportunities for cultural, academic and other exchanges with the Iranian people.

North Korea
North Korea is perhaps the most repressive regime on the planet, run by a sadistic dictator. It has conducted several nuclear tests and is attempting to develop the capability to put a nuclear warhead on a long-range missile that could directly threaten the United States. The regime is also responsible for grave human rights abuses against the North Korean people. Yet Donald Trump praises North Korea’s dictator; threatens to abandon our treaty allies, Japan and South Korea; and encourages the proliferation of nuclear weapons in the region. This approach is incoherent and rather than solving a global crisis, would create a new one. Democrats will protect America and our allies, press China to restrain North Korea, and sharpen the choices for Pyongyang to compel it to abandon its illegal nuclear and missile programs.

Russia
Russia is engaging in destabilizing actions along its borders, violating Ukraine’s sovereignty and attempting to recreate spheres of influence that undermine American interests. It is also propping up the Assad regime in Syria, which is brutally attacking its own citizens. Donald Trump would overturn more than 50 years of American foreign policy by abandoning NATO partners—countries who help us fight terrorism every day—and embracing Russian President Vladimir Putin instead. We believe in strong alliances and will deter Russian aggression, build European resilience, and protect our NATO allies. We will make it clear to Putin that we are prepared to cooperate with him when it is in our interest—as we did on reducing nuclear stockpiles, ensuring Iran could not obtain a nuclear weapon, sanctioning North Korea, and resupplying our troops in Afghanistan—but we will not hesitate to stand up to Russian aggression. We will also continue to stand by the Russian people and push the government to respect the fundamental rights of its citizens.

Cybersecurity and Online Privacy
Democrats will protect our industry, infrastructure, and government from cyberattacks. We will strengthen our cybersecurity, seek to establish global norms in cyberspace, and impose consequences on those who violate the rules. We will do this while protecting the privacy and civil liberties of the American people. We will also ensure a coherent strategy across federal agencies by building on the Obama Administration’s Cybersecurity National Action Plan, especially the empowerment of a federal Chief Information Security Officer, the modernization of federal information technology, and upgrades to government-wide cybersecurity.

Democrats reject the false choice between privacy interests and keeping Americans safe. We need liberty and security, and each makes the other possible. We will protect the privacy and civil liberties of the American people—standing firm against the type of warrantless surveillance of American citizens that flourished during the Bush Administration. We support recent reforms to government bulk data collection programs so the government is not collecting and holding millions of files on innocent Americans.

We will support a national commission on digital security and encryption to bring together technology and public safety communities to address the needs of law enforcement, protect the privacy of Americans, assess how innovation might point to new policy approaches, and advance our larger national security and global competitiveness interests.

Non-Proliferation of Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Weapons
Democrats are committed to preventing the spread of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and to eventually ridding the planet of these catastrophic weapons. We believe America will be safer in a world with fewer weapons of mass destruction. Donald Trump encourages the spread of nuclear weapons across Asia and the Middle East, which would weaken the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), and he is unwilling to rule out using a nuclear weapon against ISIS.

Democrats want to reduce the number of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons around the world, as well as their means of delivery, while retaining a strong deterrent as long as others maintain nuclear strike capabilities. We will strengthen the NPT, push for the ratification of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, and stop the spread of loose nuclear material.

Democrats will be informed by a new Nuclear Posture Review in determining continued ways to appropriately shape our nuclear deterrent, with the aim of reducing our reliance on nuclear weapons while meeting our national security obligations. Democrats will also seek new opportunities for further arms control and avoid taking steps that create incentives for the expansion of existing nuclear weapons programs. To this end, we will work to reduce excessive spending on nuclear weapons-related programs that are projected to cost $1 trillion over the next 30 years.[4]

—2016 Democratic Platform[5]

Democratic Party Tim Kaine

caption
  • On September 4, 2016,Tim Kaine discussed national security and cybersecurity on ABC's "This Week." He told Martha Raddatz, "And talk about national security -- [Trump] has openly encouraged Russia to engage in cyber hacking to try to find more e-mails or materials, and we know that this cyber attack on the DNC was likely done by Russia. A president was impeached and had to resign over an attack on the DNC during a presidential election in 1972. This is serious business. So contrast the Hillary situation, where the FBI said there’s no need for legal proceedings, with an attack that is being encouraged by Donald Trump on the DNC by Russia, similar to what led to resignation of a president 30 years ago."[6]
  • In September 2013, Kaine voted to authorize military force in Syria. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee approved an authorization by a 10-7 vote.[7]
  • Kaine supported theIran nuclear agreement and the bipartisan legislation that allowed Congress to review and vote on the deal.[8][9]
  • Read more of Tim Kaine's public statements on 2016 campaign issues.

Republican ticket

Republican Party Donald Trump

caption
  • Trump commented on a series of terror attacks that took place in New York, New Jersey, and Minnesota on September 17, 2016. In an interview on "Fox and Friends," Trump said, “I should be a newscaster because I called it before the news.” As reports of the explosion in New York were still coming in, Trump stated at a campaign rally on the night of September 17, “Just before I got off the plane, a bomb went off in New York and nobody knows exactly what's going on.”[10] In the "Fox and Friends" interview, Trump suggested that there could be more attacks in the future: “This is something that will happen, perhaps, more and more all over the country. Because we’ve been weak. Our country’s been weak. We’re letting people in by the thousands and tens of thousands. … We’re allowing these people to come into our country and destroy our country, and make it unsafe for people. We don’t want to do any profiling. If somebody looks like he’s got a massive bomb on his back, we won’t go up to that person ... because if he looks like he comes from that part of the world, we’re not allowed to profile. Give me a break.”[11]
  • On August 15, 2016,Donald Trump delivered a speech on national policy inOhio where he introduced the “three pillars” of his antiterrorism platform.[12][13]
    • Trump said that he would introduce a new ideological screening test for immigrants similar to what was in place during the Cold War. “The time is overdue to develop a new screening test for the threats we face today. I call it extreme, extreme vetting. Our country has enough problems. We don’t need more,” he said. Trump continued, “In addition to screening out all members or sympathizers of terrorist groups, we must also screen out any who have hostile attitudes toward our country or its principles ― or who believe that Sharia law should supplant American law.”
    • He reiterated his call for a temporary ban on “immigration from some of the most dangerous and volatile regions of the world that have a history of exporting terrorism.”
    • Trump also emphasized the importance of alliances with "moderate Muslim reformers in the Middle East.” He said that he would seek to hold an international conference with the leaders of Jordan, Egypt, Israel, and “all others who recognize this ideology of death that must be extinguished.” Trump also noted that there was an opportunity for improved relations with Russia, saying, “I also believe that we could find common ground with Russia in the fight against ISIS. They too have much at stake in the outcome in Syria, and have had their own battles with Islamic terrorism.”
  • At a rally in Florida on August 10, 2016, Trump called President Obama the “founder of ISIS” and Hillary Clinton the “co-founder.” Trump said, “ISIS is honoring President Obama. He is the founder of ISIS. He founded ISIS. And, I would say the co-founder would be crooked Hillary Clinton. … He was the founder of ISIS, absolutely. The way he removed our troops -- you shouldn't have gone in. I was against the war in Iraq. Totally against it.”[14]
    • Conservative radio hostHugh Hewitt called on Trump to clarify the remarks the following day. Hewitt said, “You meant that he [Obama] created the vacuum, he lost the peace.” Trump said, “No, I meant he’s the founder of ISIS. I do. He was the most valuable player. I give him the most valuable player award. I give her, too, by the way, Hillary Clinton.” On August 12, 2016, Trump tweeted that he was being sarcastic.[15][16]
  • Fifty Republican senior national security officials releaseda joint statement on August 8, 2016, charging thatDonald Trump “fundamentally...lacks the character, values, and experience” to be commander-in-chief. They continued, “He is unable or unwilling to separate truth from falsehood. He does not encourage conflicting views. He lacks self-control and acts impetuously. He cannot tolerate personal criticism. He has alarmed our closest allies with his erratic behavior.” While they also expressed reservations withHillary Clinton, they concluded that Trump “is not the answer to America’s daunting challenges and to this crucial election.”[17]
  • On August 2, 2016, Donald Trump promised to defeat theIslamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) by bombing them, if elected. He said, "We have no choice but to bomb them. They have taken over Libya. That was another one ofHillary Clinton's duties — they have taken over Libya. No good. We have to bomb them. … I would do what you have to do to get rid of ISIS. It's a horrific problem. ... We should have never been there in the first place. I was opposed to going into Iraq.”[18]
  • During a campaign rally in North Carolina on July 5, 2016, Donald Trump warned that Americans “should be worried about a continuation of Obama-era policies, particularly U.S. foreign policy in the wake of the Iraq war, which he said he opposed,” according toThe Wall Street Journal. Trump then said, “Saddam Hussein was a bad guy, right? He was a bad guy, a really bad guy. But you know what he did well? He killed terrorists. He did that so good. They didn’t read them the rights, they didn’t talk. They were a terrorist? It was over. Today, Iraq is Harvard for terrorism. You want to be a terrorist, you go to Iraq.”[19]
  • Donald Trump released a statement regarding the terrorist attack at an airport in Istanbul, Turkey, on June 28, 2016, that left at least 36 people dead and injured 147 people. He said, “Our prayers are with the families of those killed and injured in Istanbul. The whole world is stunned and horrified. The terrorist threat has never been greater. Our enemies are brutal and ruthless and will do anything to murder those who do not bend to their will. We must take steps now to protect America from terrorists, and do everything in our power to improve our security to keep America safe.”[20]
  • During a campaign event in St. Clairsville, Ohio,Trump expressed his support for waterboarding terrorists after the news of the terrorist attack in Istanbul, Turkey, broke late on June 28, 2016. Trump said, “We can’t do waterboarding, but they can do chopping off heads, drowning people in steel cages, they can do whatever they want to do. You know, you have to fight fire with fire. I like it a lot. I don’t think it’s tough enough.”[21]
  • After initially "calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on," Donald Trump’s “spokeswoman says he's no longer seeking the ban at all,” according toThe Associated Press. When asked to clarify Trump’s policy, Trump’s spokeswomanHope Hicks said, "Mr. Trump stated a position consistent with his speech two weeks ago.” On June 27, 2016, Hicks added in an email that Trump “has been very clear” about his policy and that the press has "tried to cause confusion." In the speech Hick’s referenced, Trump said, "When I'm elected, I will suspend immigration from areas of the world where there is a proven history of terrorism against the United States, Europe or our allies, until we fully understand how to end these threats."[22]
  • In an interview on April 11, 2016, Donald Trump called CIA DirectorJohn Brennan's refusal to waterboard “ridiculous.” He said, “We’re playing on different fields, and we have a huge problem with ISIS, which we can’t beat. And the reason we can’t beat them is because we can’t use strong tactics, whether it’s this or other thing. So I think his comments are ridiculous. Can you imagine these ISIS people sitting around, eating and talking about this country won’t allow waterboarding and they just chopped off 50 heads?”[23]
  • In a nine-minute video released by the Islamic State to celebrate the Brussels terrorist attacks on March 24, 2016, comments Trump made in a phone interview about the city were featured. “Brussels was one of the great cities — one of the most beautiful cities of the world 20 years ago — and safe. And now it’s a horror show — an absolute horror show,” Trump says.[24]
  • When asked if he would be willing to use tactical nuclear weapons against ISIS, Trump said, “I'm never going to rule anything out—I wouldn't want to say. Even if I wasn't, I wouldn't want to tell you that because at a minimum, I want them to think maybe we would use them.”[25]
  • Donald Trump said on March 22, 2016, in the wake of the Brussels terrorist attacks, that Brussels had changed drastically from when he visited the city years ago. “Anybody that goes there will tell you it's like an armed camp,” he said. Trump also warned that many people in the U.S. “have the same feelings and the same feeling of hate as the people in Brussels” and argued that America’s borders should be strengthened and more care taken with who is allowed in.[26]
  • On February 19, 2016, Trump called for his supporters to boycott Apple until it assists the Federal Bureau of Investigation in the investigation into the San Bernardino shooters.[27]
  • During a campaign stop inSouth Carolina on February 17, 2016,Donald Trump expressed support for enhanced interrogation techniques like waterboarding. He said, “Don’t tell me it doesn’t work. Torture works, OK folks? I think we should go much stronger than waterboarding, that’s the way I feel. They’re chopping off heads, believe me, we should go much stronger.”[28]
  • At theninth Republican presidential primary debate on February 13, 2016, Trump talked about the war in Iraq: “Obviously, the war in Iraq was a big, fat mistake. All right? Now, you can take it any way you want, and it took -- it tookJeb Bush, if you remember at the beginning of his announcement, when he announced for president, it took him five days. He went back, it was a mistake, it wasn't a mistake. It took him five days before his people told him what to say, and he ultimately said, ‘it was a mistake.’ The war in Iraq, we spent $2 trillion, thousands of lives, we don't even have it. Iran has taken over Iraq with the second-largest oil reserves in the world. Obviously, it was a mistake.George Bush made a mistake. We can make mistakes. But that one was a beauty. We should have never been in Iraq. We have destabilized the Middle East.”[29]
  • During theninth Republican presidential primary debate on February 13, 2016, Trump discussed the three questions that he would ask his national security experts on his first day in office: “What we want to do, when we want to do it, and how hard do we want to hit? Because we are going to have to hit very, very hard to knock out ISIS. We're going to also have to learn who our allies are. We have allies, so-called allies, we're spending billions and billions of dollars supporting people -- we have no idea who they are in Syria. Do we want to stay that route, or do we want to go and make something with Russia? I hate to say Iran, but with Russia, because we -- and the Iran deal is one of the worst deals I have ever seen negotiated in my entire life. It's a disgrace that this country negotiated that deal. But very important… Not only a disgrace, it's a disgrace and an embarrassment. But very important, who are we fighting with? Who are we fighting for? What are we doing? We have to rebuild our country. But we have to -- I'm the only one on this stage that said, ‘Do not go into Iraq. Do not attack Iraq.’ Nobody else on this stage said that. And I said it loud and strong. And I was in the private sector. I wasn't a politician, fortunately. But I said it, and I said it loud and clear, ‘You'll destabilize the Middle East.’ That's exactly what happened. I also said, by the way, four years ago, three years ago, attack the oil, take the wealth away, attack the oil and keep the oil. They didn't listen. They just started that a few months ago.”[30]
  • During an interview with Fox News on February 9, 2016, Trump criticized SenatorJohn McCain’s handling of the problems with theDepartment of Veterans Affairs and his stance on waterboarding. He said, "John McCain is a nice man. I like John McCain. But he has not been effective in taking care of the Veterans Administration. The veterans are absolutely in a bad way, they're being treated worse in many cases than illegal immigrants that come over our borders.” On the issue of waterboarding, which McCain opposes and has criticized some of the presidential candidates for stating that they would utilize the technique, Trump said, "As far as John McCain is concerned, when you say we can't waterboard but they can chop off the heads of Christians and they can chop off the heads of everybody in the Middle East as far as they want, I think that's pretty bad. So I said I'm totally in favor of waterboarding. Waterboarding is peanuts compared to chopping off heads."[31]
  • At theeighth Republican presidential primary debate on February 6, 2016, Trump said, as president, he would bring back waterboarding: "Well, I'll tell you what. In the Middle East, we have people chopping the heads off Christians, we have people chopping the heads off many other people. We have things that we have never seen before -- as a group, we have never seen before, what's happening right now. The medieval times -- I mean, we studied medieval times -- not since medieval times have people seen what's going on. I would bring back waterboarding and I'd bring back a hell of a lot worse than waterboarding."[32]
  • On February 8, 2016, Sen.John McCain (R-Ariz.) took issue with Trump's support waterboarding. "It is important to remember the facts: that these forms of torture not only failed their purpose to secure actionable intelligence to prevent further attacks on the U.S. and our allies, but compromised our values, stained our national honor and did little practical good," McCain, who chairs theArmed Services Committee, said. McCain, who was tortured while held in Vietnam as a prisoner of war, has been a vocal opponent of waterboarding and suggested that the Republican candidates should remember the fallout from the Bush administration's Abu Ghraib scandal, when human rights groups found that U.S. soldiers were abusing and torturing detainees at the Iraqi prison.[33]
  • On CNN'sNew Day on December 8, 2015, Trump said, unless his proposal to ban Muslims from entering the country was adopted, "You're going to have many more World Trade Centers if you don't solve it -- many, many more and probably beyond the World Trade Center. They want our buildings to come down; they want our cities to be crushed. They are living within our country. And many of them want to come from outside our country." When asked how long he would keep the ban on allowing Muslims into the country, Trump said, "It's until the country's representatives can figure out what's going on.”[34]
  • Trump called for a "total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States," theAssociated Press reported December 7, 2015. "The proposed ban would apply to immigrants and visitors alike, a sweeping prohibition affecting all adherents of Islam who want to come to the U.S. According to theAP, Trump's campaign said in a statement the ban should be in place "until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on." The statement continued, "Until we are able to determine and understand this problem and the dangerous threat it poses, our country cannot be the victims of horrendous attacks by people that believe only in jihad, and have no sense of reason or respect for human life." The idea faced an immediate challenge to its legality and feasibility from experts was swiftly condemned by his rival GOP candidates for president and other Republicans, the article said.[35]
  • On December 6, 2015, Trump said the desire to be “politically correct” was “part of the problem” in defeating terrorism in the U.S. He added that he supported profiling Muslims, saying, “If you have people coming out of mosques with hatred and with death in their eyes and on their minds, we’re going to have to do something.” Trump also pointed to his personal friendships with Muslims to defend his policy positions. “I'm not playing on fears. I don't want to play on fears. I understand the whole world. I have Muslim friends who are great people. And by the way, they tell me, 'there's a big problem.' I'm not playing on fears. I'm playing on common sense."[36][37]
  • He also noted that he supported profiling Muslims, saying, “If you have people coming out of mosques with hatred and with death in their eyes and on their minds, we’re going to have to do something.” Trump pointed to his personal friendships with Muslims to defend his policy positions. “I'm not playing on fears. I don't want to play on fears. I understand the whole world. I have Muslim friends who are great people. And by the way, they tell me, 'there's a big problem.' I'm not playing on fears. I'm playing on common sense." The desire to be “politically correct” is “part of the problem,” Trump warned.[38][39]
  • On December 3, 2015, Trump said theSan Bernardino, Calif., mass shooting was likely “another Islamic disaster.” He continued, “No matter where you look, it's the same thing. Then when I say we have to practice vigilance and we have to look at people — and whether you're looking at mosques or not — we have to be smart. They want to be so politically correct, but here's another case where it's Islamic terrorism." When asked what “looking at mosques” would entail, Trump said, “You have to be vigilant. You have to look. I mean, there's something wrong — something going on, all right?"[40]
  • In an interview on ABC News on November 22, 2015, Trump said he supported reinstating waterboarding. “I would bring it back, yes. I would bring it back. I think waterboarding is peanuts compared to what they’d do to us, what they’re doing to us, what they did to James Foley when they chopped off his head. That’s a whole different level and I would absolutely bring back interrogation and strong interrogation,” he said.[41]
  • Trump took to Twitter November 20, 2015, where he said he had not proposed setting up a database for registering Muslims in the United States. He stressed the idea was brought up by a NBC News reporter interviewing him. The interview opened up Trump to criticism fromHillary Clinton who denounced his comments calling them "shocking." Some of Trump's Republican opponents also weighed in on November 20, 2015.Jeb Bush called the idea "abhorrent" andTed Cruz said a registry goes against the notion of religious liberty.Bernie Sanders also called Trump's comments "outrageous and bigoted"[42]

    I didn't suggest a database-a reporter did. We must defeat Islamic terrorism & have surveillance, including a watch list, to protect America

    — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump)November 20, 2015
  • In the wake of the terrorist attack in Paris, November 13, 2015, Trump told NBC News on November 19, 2015, that he “would certainly implement” a database registering Muslims in the United States. “It’s all about management. Our country has no management,” Trump said, adding that Muslims would be legally obligated to sign up. When asked if such a database would be akin to the registration of Jews in Nazi Germany, Trump repeated four times, “You tell me.”[43]
  • In an October 25, 2015, interview with CNN, Trump said that Iraq and Libya would be more stable today if Saddam Hussein and Moammar Gadhafi had not been removed from power. He said, "I mean, look at Libya. Look at Iraq. Iraq used to be no terrorists. He [Hussein] would kill the terrorists immediately, which is like now it's the Harvard of terrorism. If you look at Iraq from years ago, I'm not saying he was a nice guy, he was a horrible guy, but it was a lot better than it is right now. Right now, Iraq is a training ground for terrorists. Right now Libya, nobody even knows Libya, frankly there is no Iraq and there is no Libya. It's all broken up. They have no control. Nobody knows what's going on."[44]
  • During a campaign event in South Carolina on October 19, 2015, Trump attempted to clarify a statement he had made that called the Bush administration’s decision to send troops into Afghanistan after 9/11 a “terrible mistake.” He explained that he was against the Iraq War and believed Afghanistan should have been the focus.[45]
  • Trump expressed support for Russia’s military intervention in Syria on October 4, 2015. "I like that Putin is bombing the hell out of ISIS, and it's going to be ISIS. I'll tell you why — Putin has to get rid of ISIS because Putin doesn't want ISIS coming into Russia," said Trump. He added that that did not mean he trusted Russian President Vladimir Putin. “I'm not justifying Putin, but you watch — he'll get bogged down there. He'll be there, he'll spend a fortune, he'll be begging to get out,” he said.[46]
  • On October 3, 2015, Trump questioned why “young” and “strong” male Syrian refugees weren’t fighting for Syria. He said accepting a large number of Syrian refugees “could be one of the greatest military coups of all time,” likening it to “a Trojan horse.”[47]
  • Trump expressed support for Russia’s military intervention in Syria. "I like that Putin is bombing the hell out of ISIS, and it's going to be ISIS. I'll tell you why — Putin has to get rid of ISIS because Putin doesn't want ISIS coming into Russia," said Trump. He added that that did not mean he trusted Russian President Vladimir Putin. “I'm not justifying Putin, but you watch — he'll get bogged down there. He'll be there, he'll spend a fortune, he'll be begging to get out,” he said.Cite error: Closing</ref> missing for<ref> tag
  • In June 2015, Trump stated in an interview withFOX's Bill O'Reilly, "I say that you can defeatISIS by taking their wealth. Take back the oil. Once you go over and take back that oil they have nothing. You bomb the hell out of them and then you encircle it, and then you go in. And you let Mobil go in, and you let our great oil companies go in. Once you take that oil they have nothing left." In this interview, Trump also predicted that he would have "a great relationship with Putin."[48]
  • According to a May 2015 article inThe Daily Signal, Trump suggested theNational Security Agency (NSA) should be allowed to continue its surveillance with "proper oversight." Trump said, "I support legislation which allows the NSA to hold the bulk metadata. For oversight, I propose that a court, which is available any time on any day, is created to issue individual rulings on when this metadata can be accessed."[49]
  • Speaking at theConservative Political Action Conference in February 2015, Trump invoked the approach of historic generals to say the country should be more forceful in its efforts against ISIS. Trump said, "On ISIS, nobody, if I decide to run and win, nobody would be tougher than Donald Trump. I would hit them so hard and so fast that they wouldn't know what happened. I would find a general. Remember the old days of…these great generals? General [Douglas] MacArthur is spinning in his grave when he sees what we did. So you gotta them hard, gotta hit them firm."[50]
  • During an appearance onFox and Friends in April 2013, Trump suggested that the United States should not get involved in the Syrian Civil War because it would mean "funding al Qaeda."[51]
  • In an April 2011 interview withThe Wall Street Journal, Trump declared that he would not intervene in Libya unless he could take the country's oil.[52]
The 2016 Republican Party Platform on national security
Confronting the Dangers

In the face of these threats, the first order of business for a Republican president and Congress will be to restore our nation’s military might. Republicans continue to support American military superiority which has been the cornerstone of a strategy that seeks to deter aggression or defeat those who threaten our vital national security interests. We must rebuild troop numbers and readiness and confirm their mission: Protecting the nation, not nation building. The United States should meet the Reagan model of “peace through strength” by a force that is capable of meeting any and all threats to our vital national security. We will no longer tolerate a President whose rules of engagement put our own troops in harm’s way or commanders who tell their soldiers that their first duty is to fight climate change.

A Republican administration will begin at once to undo the damage of the last eight years. We must move from a budget-based strategy to one that puts the security of our nation first. This means that our Republican president’s strategic vision will include the development of a balanced force to meet the diverse threats facing our nation. Special Operations Forces are simply not intended to deal with the full spectrum of threats. We need a Reagan-era force that can fight and win two-and one-half wars ranging from counterterrorism to deterring major power aggressors.

We should abandon arms control treaties that benefit our adversaries without improving our national security. We must fund, develop, and deploy a multi-layered missile defense system. We must modernize nuclear weapons and their delivery platforms, end the policy of Mutually Assured Destruction, and rebuild relationships with our allies, who understand that as long as the U.S. nuclear arsenal is their shield, they do not need to engage in nuclear proliferation.

While immigration is addressed in more detail elsewhere, we cannot ignore the reality that border security is a national security issue, and that our nation’s immigration and refugee policies are placing Americans at risk. To keep our people safe, we must secure our borders, enforce our immigration laws, and properly screen refugees and other immigrants entering from any country. In particular we must apply special scrutiny to those foreign nationals seeking to enter the United States from terror-sponsoring countries or from regions associated with Islamic terrorism. This was done successfully after September 11, 2001, under the National Security Entry-Exit Registration System, which should be renewed now

...

Facing 21st Century Threats:

Cybersecurity in an Insecure World
Cyber attacks against our businesses, institutions, and the government itself have become almost routine. They will continue until the world understands that an attack will not be tolerated — that we are prepared to respond in kind and in greater magnitude. Despite their promises to the contrary, Russia and China see cyber operations as a part of a warfare strategy during peacetime. Our response should be to cause diplomatic, financial, and legal pain, curtailing visas for guilty parties, freezing their assets, and pursuing criminal actions against them. We should seek to weaken control over the internet by regimes that engage in cyber crimes. We must stop playing defense and go on offense to avoid the cyber-equivalent of Pearl Harbor.

The Republican Congress has passed important legislation to advance information-sharing among entities endangered by cyber attacks. We will explore the possibility of a free market for Cy-ber-Insurance and make clear that users have a self-defense right to deal with hackers as they see fit. It is critical that we protect the cyber supply chain to ensure against contamination of components made all over the world, sometimes in offending countries. Our own cyber workforce should be expanded with the assistance of the military, business, and hacker communities to better protect our country.

Protection Against an Electromagnetic Pulse
A single nuclear weapon detonated at high altitude over this country would collapse our electrical grid and other critical infrastructures and endanger the lives of millions. With North Korea in possession of nuclear missiles and Iran close to having them, an EMP is no longer a theoretical concern — it is a real threat. Moreover, China and Russia include sabotage as part of their warfare planning. Nonetheless, hundreds of electrical utilities in the United States have not acted to protect themselves from EMP, and they cannot be expected to do so voluntarily since homeland security is a government responsibility. The President, the Congress, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Defense, the States, the utilities, and the private sector should work together on an urgent basis to enact Republican legislation, pending in both chambers, to protect the national grid and encourage states to take the initiative to protect their own grids expeditiously.

Confronting Internet Tyranny
Internet firewall circumvention and anti- censorship technology must become a national priority in light of the way authoritarian governments such as China, Cuba, and Iran restrict free press and isolate their people limiting political, cultural, and religious freedom. Leaders of authoritarian governments argue that governments have the same legal right to control internet access as they do to control migrant access. A focus on internet freedom is a cost-effective means of peacefully advancing fundamental freedoms in closed and authoritarian societies. But it is also an important economic interest, as censorship constitutes a trade barrier for U.S. companies operating in societies like China with advanced firewall protection policies. A Republican administration will champion an open and free internet based on principles of free expression and universal values and will pursue policies to empower citizens and U.S. companies operating in authoritarian countries to circumvent internet firewalls and gain accurate news and information online.[4]

—2016 Republican Party Platform[53]

Republican Party Mike Pence

caption
  • In September 2014,Mike Pence "applauded Obama for engaging with allies in an effort to defeat ISIS but added, 'This cannot be one more speech followed by hesitation and indecision. The Bible says, 'If the trumpet does not sound a clear call, who will know to get ready for battle?'" according toThe Indianapolis Star.[54]
  • While serving in Congress, Pence "was a strong proponent of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq," according toThe Washington Post.[55]
  • In 2011, Pence voted for H.Res.292 - Declaring that the President shall not deploy, establish, or maintain the presence of units and members of the United States Armed Forces on the ground in Libya, and for other purposes.[56]
  • Pence voted for H.R.3162 - the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) Act of 2001. It became law on October 26, 2001.[57]
  • Pence voted for H.R.3199 - the USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005. It became law on March 9, 2006.[58]

Green candidate

Green Party Jill Stein

Jill-Stein-circle.png
  • While campaigning in Iowa on September 11, 2016,Jill Stein said that she would not have assassinated Osama bin Laden if she were president. “I think assassinations … they’re against international law to start with and to that effect, I think I would not have assassinated Osama bin Laden but would have captured him and brought him to trial," she said.[60]
  • At a town hall event hosted by CNN on August 17, 2016, Stein criticized the approaches of the Bush and Obama administrations in the war on terror: “We have a track record now of fighting terrorism ... This track record is not looking so good. We have killed a million people in Iraq alone. … What do we have to show for this? Failed states, mass refugee migrations and repeated terrorist threats.” Stein also critiqued Clinton’s stances on foreign policy, saying, “The war effort that Hillary has especially been the engine behind ... To my mind, that's just not compatible with what my view of feminism is, that has a responsibility, not just to your own family, but to all families and to the human family.”[61]
  • During a February 5, 2016, interview withPolitical People Blog, Stein addressed defense spending and its impact on the safety of the U.S., saying, "It's very hard for people to listen to a proposal or a plan for reducing the military budget while they feel like their lives are at risk. And currently American fears are being so whipped up into a frenzy by this endless stream of propaganda. So, it's not only the election dialogue and the absolute fear campaigning going on on the part of Republicans, but the Democrats buy into that as well."[62]
  • In January 2015, Stein saidISIS had grown as a result of poor foreign policy choices. She explained, "We need a foreign policy based on international law, human rights, and diplomacy, instead of militarism. Our current foreign policy has been an outright, incredible disaster. Drones and torture have especially been damaging and the past decade of endless war on terror has been an unmitigated disaster which is now blowing back at us in the proliferation of extremist groups. ISIS itself grows directly out of the chaos. We see this in Iraq through ten years of vicious warfare and sectarian conflict that was promoted by our policies in Iraq."[63]
  • In a 2012 interview with Taylor Peck ofiSideWith, Stein criticized sanctions of Iran, saying, "That approach has been extremely unhelpful and we are not using diplomacy. If there are real threats to U.S. security then sanctions are warranted but I don't see that Iran is threatening U.S. security right now. The issue of Iran is that it has the potential to build nuclear weapons, it does not have nuclear weapons right now. There are already illegal nuclear weapons in the region in Israel and Pakistan. We need a comprehensive and evenhanded policy. There are drastic violations of human rights right now amongst both our friends and our enemies. Creating a nuclear free Middle East is the only way we are going to stop the development of nuclear weapons."[64]
  • Read more of Jill Stein's public statements on national security.
The 2016 Green Party Platform on national security
Foreign Policy—Peace and Disarmament

As one of the initiators and primary authors of the United Nations Charter, the United States is obligated to conform to the stipulations of the U.S. Constitution, which identifies all such agreements as treaties that hold the authority of U.S. law. The U.S. government is pledged to abide by its principles and guidelines in the conduct of foreign relations and affairs.

We recognize our government's obligation to take disputes with other nations or foreign bodies to the U.N. Security Council and General Assembly forum for negotiation and resolution. The U.N. and international laws, treaties and conventions that the U.S. has signed are the framework that controls U.S. military actions abroad.

The U.S. must recognize the sovereignty of nation-states and their right of self-determination.

We recognize and support the right of the U.N. to intervene in a nation-state engaged in genocidal acts or in its persistent violation and denial of the human rights of an ethnic or religious group within its boundaries, and the right to protect the victims of such acts.

The U.S. is obligated to render military assistance or service under U.N. command to enforce U.N. Security Council resolutions.

The U.S. must recognize and abide by the authority of the U.N. General Assembly to act in a crisis situation by passing a resolution under the Uniting for Peace Procedure when the U.N. Security Council is stalemated by vetoes.

We seek the permanent repeal of the veto power enjoyed by the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council.

We urge our government to sign the International Criminal Court agreement and respect the authority of that institution.

Our government does not have the right to justify preemptive invasion of another country on the grounds that the other country harbors, trains, equips and funds a terrorist cell.

Our government should establish a policy to abolish nuclear weapons. It should set the conditions and schedule for fulfilling that goal by taking the following steps: Declare a no-first-strike policy. Declare a no-pre-emptive strike policy. Declare that the U.S. will never threaten or use a nuclear weapon, regardless of size, on a non-nuclear nation. Sign the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT). Our pledge to end testing will open the way for non-nuclear states to sign the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which has been held up by our refusal to sign the CTBT. Honor the conditions set in the NPT for nuclear nations. Reverse our withdrawal from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty and honor its stipulations. End the research, testing and stockpiling of all nuclear weapons of any size. Dismantle all nuclear warheads from their missiles.We urge our government to sign the Toronto treaty banning the production, stockpiling, use and sale of land mines, and assist other nations in unearthing and disabling land mines buried in their lands.

We urge our government to end all stockpiling of chemical and biological weapons and all research, use, and sale of such weapons; and sign the convention that will establish the decrease and inspection of all nations' stockpiles of such weapons, which the U.S. abandoned.

The U.S. must allow foreign teams to visit the U.S. for verification purposes at least annually.

Our defense budget has increased out of all proportion to any military threat to the United States, and to our domestic social, economic and environmental needs. The United States government must reduce our defense budget to half of its current size. The 2012 defense budget exceeded $700 billion, and that does not take into account military expenditures not placed under the defense budget.

The U.S. has over 700 foreign military bases. We urge our government to phase out all bases not specifically functioning under a U.N. resolution to keep peace and bring home our troops stationed abroad, except for the military assigned to protect a U.S. embassy. Many of these bases are small and can be closed immediately. We advocate further reductions in U.S. foreign military bases at a rate of closure of 1/4 to 1/5 of their numbers every year.

Close the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation, formerly known as the School of the Americas, in Ft. Benning, Georgia.

The U.S. is the largest arms seller and dealer in the world. We urge our government to prohibit all arms sales to foreign nations and likewise prohibit grants to impoverished and undemocratic nations unless the money is targeted on domestic, non-military needs. In addition, grants to other nations may not be used to release their own funds for military purposes.

The U.S. must not be a conduit for defense contractors to market their products abroad and must shift our export market from arms to peaceful technology, industrial and agricultural products, and education.

The U.S. must prohibit all covert actions used to influence, de-stabilize or usurp the governments of other nations, and likewise prohibit the assassination of, or assistance in any form for the assassination of, foreign government officials.

We must build on the Earth Charter that came out of the 1992 U.N. environmental Earth Summit. New definitions of what constitutes real security between nations must be debated and adopted by the foreign policy community.[4]

—2016 Green Party Platform[65]

Libertarian candidate

Libertarian Party Gary Johnson

Gary-Johnson-(New Mexico)-circle.png
  • In an interview on Fox Business on September 19, 2016, Johnson said he would close the Department of Homeland Security. “I think it’s just another layer of bureaucracy. It’s just spending more money than we have to spend. Look, we should always be looking for ways to make government more efficient. Why is it that government makes the perfect choices and business doesn’t? Well, business doesn’t and they admit it. … It was the merging of 22 separate agencies. I just think it’s corporate reorg gone bad. I would just devolve those agencies back to where they came from in the first place. I think we can all recognize the FBI has been around a long time. They have a great reputation. Going forward, this would be FBI-driven.”[66]
  • Gary Johnson discussed withdrawing from Afghanistan in an interview withThe Los Angeles Times published on August 1, 2016. Johnson said, “Let's get out of Afghanistan now. I supported going into Afghanistan at the beginning. That was going after Al Qaeda, I think that we accomplished those goals after about seven months. We could have … after seven months, we didn't find Osama Bin Laden. But we could have said we're getting out, we've knocked out Al Qaeda, and we're going to come back in if we see that Osama Bin Laden raises his head. The consequences of getting out of Afghanistan tomorrow you could say are gonna be horrible. Well, we could mitigate the horrible circumstances [of] getting out by saying if your life's in danger because you've aligned yourself with the U.S. -- I imagine that might affect a lot of individuals -- we could offer them sanctuary in the U.S. and I don't think that's unprecedented.”[67]
  • Johnson released a statement regarding the terrorist attack at an airport in Istanbul, Turkey, on June 28, 2016, that left at least 36 people dead and injured 147 people. He said, "My thoughts are with the victims of the horrific and cowardly attack in #istanbul, & with our ally Turkey. Violent extremism is pure evil."[68]
  • During an interview withThe Texas Tribune on April 12, 2016, Johnson discussed how he would secure the border to prevent criminals from entering the United States. He said the crime “has to do with drugs. The U.S. is on the verge of having the whole country legalize marijuana. I think California is going to vote to legalize marijuana in November, and then 20 state legislatures will legalize it virtually overnight. This is going to lead to the end of prohibition. This is going to lead to a tremendous reduction in border violence.”[69]
  • In a statement released on November 19, 2015,Johnson said that Sharia ideology should be recognized as antithetical to American values. He said, "It is time that we have an open, honest dialogue about the politics of Sharia law. It is time that we face the reality that, while Islam is a faith that must be granted the same freedoms of religion as all others, Sharia is a political ideology that cannot coexist with the constitutional and basic human rights on which the United States is founded. We must face the fact that ISIS is a murderous, violent movement driven by Sharia ideology, not by the religion of Islam. We need not and should not be Islamophobic, but all who are free and wish to be free should be Shariaphobic."[70]
  • In an interview withReason in November 2015, Johnson criticized drone strikes. He said, "When it comes to drones, I think it makes a bad situation even worse. We end up killing innocents and fueling hatred as opposed to containing it. It just hasn't worked." He also briefly discussed theSyrian refugee crisis, saying, "We need to take our share, and I'm not sure what that share should be. I'd like to come up with a formula based on our coalition partners. I wouldn't say zero, but I don't know if 65,000 puts us in the category of 'our fair share.'"[70]
  • In August 2013, Johnson opposed military intervention in Syria because there was "no clear" American interest in the conflict there. He posted this statement to Facebook: “No one disagrees that the use of chemical weapons in Syria is despicable, and the results tragic. However, those facts alone do not make going to war either justified or even a good idea. And while the Administration can parse words all day long, launching missiles or dropping bombs constitutes going to war. There is no clear U.S. interest in what is, in reality, a civil war on the other side of the globe. Likewise, there is nothing to indicate at this time that intervening in that civil war will benefit anyone -- either here in America or in Syria. The consequences of our military actions in Iraq, Libya and Afghanistan should be a lesson to President Obama and others who appear determined to act without any meaningful strategic or national defense justification.”[71]
  • During a Republican presidential primary debate in September 2011, Johnson said he believed that "the biggest threat to our national security is the fact that we're bankrupt." He continued, "I am promising to submit a balanced budget to Congress in the year 2013, and included in that is a 43 percent reduction in military spending. I think it's crazy that we have foreign aid to countries when we're borrowing 43 cents out of every dollar to do that. Military alliances are really key to other countries taking up the slack."[72]
  • On May 27, 2011, Johnson said that the U.S. should no longer be in Afghanistan during an interview on FOX News. "Well, initially, Afghanistan was totally warranted. We were attacked. We attacked back. That's what our military is for. We should remain vigilant to the terrorist threat. But after being in Afghanistan for six months I think we effectively wiped out al Qaeda. And here it is, we are there 10 years later. We're building roads, schools, bridges, highways and hospitals and borrowing 43 cents out of every dollar to do that," Johnson said.[73]
  • Johnson wrote an op-ed inThe Daily Caller on March 23, 2011, to condemn U.S. military intervention in Libya to depose Muammar Gaddafi. Johnson argued that although the "world would be better off without" Gaddafi, the U.S. should not intervene because of the potential human and financial costs. "At the end of the day, what is happening in Libya is a civil war against a clearly bad leader. The world is full of clearly bad and evil leaders, and millions of people being victimized by them. What makes Libya special? Simply enforcing a no-fly zone will cost American taxpayers as much as $300 million a week, and that doesn’t include all those Tomahawk missiles and B-2 round trips. More importantly, those are American crews risking their lives. If there is some compelling reason to be doing what we are doing, tell us what it is. If, on the other hand, we are once again playing cop to the world, we can’t afford it," Johnson wrote.[74]
The 2016 Libertarian Party Platform on national security
The defense of the country requires that we have adequate intelligence to detect and to counter threats to domestic security. This requirement must not take priority over maintaining the civil liberties of our citizens. The Constitution and Bill of Rights shall not be suspended even during time of war. Intelligence agencies that legitimately seek to preserve the security of the nation must be subject to oversight and transparency. We oppose the government’s use of secret classifications to keep from the public information that it should have, especially that which shows that the government has violated the law.[4]
—2016 Libertarian Party Platform[75]

Withdrawn candidates

Recent news

The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms2016 presidential candidates national security. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

See also

Footnotes

  1. The Washington Free Beacon, "Clinton Privately Opposed Major U.S. Nuclear Upgrade," September 27, 2016
  2. TIME, "Read Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump’s Remarks at a Military Forum," September 7, 2016
  3. The New York Times, "Hillary Clinton Throws a Foreign Policy Counterpunch at Donald Trump," July 25, 2016
  4. 4.04.14.24.3Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  5. Democratic Party, "The 2016 Democratic Party Platform," accessed August 24, 2016
  6. ABC News, "'This Week' Transcript: Sen. Tim Kaine and Kellyanne Conway," September 4, 2016
  7. Politico, "How Senate committee members voted," September 4, 2013
  8. Politico, "Kaine on the issues: Not always taking the party line," July 23, 2016
  9. Politico, "Iran bill unlikely to scuttle deal," April 16, 2015
  10. CNN, "Trump says 'bomb went off in New York,'" September 18, 2016
  11. LA Times, "Donald Trump warns of more attacks and boasts that he 'called' bombing in New York," September 19, 2016
  12. The Washington Post, "Donald Trump calls for ‘extreme vetting’ of people looking to come to the United States," August 15, 2016
  13. Heavy, "Full Transcript of Donald Trump Foreign Policy Speech," August 15, 2016
  14. The Guardian, "Donald Trump calls Obama the 'founder of Isis'," August 11, 2016
  15. The New York Times, "Donald Trump Laments Sliding Polls While Maintaining His Provocative Approach," August 11, 2016
  16. The Hill, "Trump: Calling Obama ISIS founder was 'sarcasm,'" August 12, 2016
  17. The New York Times, "50 G.O.P. Officials Warn Donald Trump Would Put Nation's Security 'at Risk'," August 9, 2016
  18. The Hill, "Trump: US has 'no choice but to bomb' ISIS in Libya," August 2, 2016
  19. The Wall Street Journal, "Donald Trump, at North Carolina Rally, Praises Saddam Hussein’s Anti-Terror Approach," July 6, 2016
  20. DonaldJTrump.com, "Press Release: Trump Campaign Statement on Recent Istanbul Attack," June 28, 2016
  21. The Hill, "Trump renews call for waterboarding after Istanbul attack," June 29, 2016
  22. The Associated Press, "Trump's Shifting Position Muslim Ban Causes Confusion," June 28, 2016
  23. Politico, "Trump: CIA chief's waterboarding refusal 'ridiculous'," April 11, 2016
  24. Ishaan Tharoor,The Washington Post, "New Islamic State video celebrates Brussels attacks by quoting Donald Trump," March 24, 2016
  25. Bloomberg, "‘Unpredictability’ on Nukes Among Trump Keys to Muslim Respect," March 23, 2016
  26. ABC News, "Donald Trump Argues Many in US Share 'Same Feeling of Hate' as Terrorists Behind Brussels Attack," March 22, 2016
  27. CNN.com, "Trump calls for Apple boycott," February 19, 2016
  28. The Wall Street Journal, "Donald Trump Calls for Use of Torture, Resumption of Waterboarding," February 17, 2016
  29. The Washington Post, "The CBS News Republican debate transcript, annotated," February 13, 2016
  30. The Washington Post, "The CBS News Republican debate transcript, annotated," February 13, 2016
  31. CNN Politics, "Trump softens tone on McCain, stands by waterboarding support," February 9, 2016
  32. The Washington Post, "Transcript of the New Hampshire GOP debate, annotated," February 6, 2016
  33. The Hill, "McCain jabs Trump for waterboarding support," February 8, 2016
  34. CNN Politics, "Trump warns: 'Many more World Trade Centers'," December 8, 2015
  35. AP:The Big Story, "Trump calls for 'complete shutdown' on Muslims entering US," December 7, 2015
  36. Bloomberg, "Trump Says Political Correctness Helped Enable California Attack," December 6, 2015
  37. CBS News, "Donald Trump: "I'm not playing on fears" of Muslims," December 6, 2015
  38. Bloomberg, "Trump Says Political Correctness Helped Enable California Attack," December 6, 2015
  39. CBS News, "Donald Trump: "I'm not playing on fears" of Muslims," December 6, 2015
  40. Business Insider, " "TRUMP: San Bernardino shooting 'looks like another Islamic disaster'," December 3, 2015
  41. Talking Points Memo, "Donald Trump Said He'd Bring Back Waterboarding," November 22, 2015
  42. USA Today, "Trump, under fire, backs off Muslim database idea," November 20, 2015
  43. NBC News, "Donald Trump's Plan for a Muslim Database Draws Comparison to Nazi Germany," November 19, 2015
  44. CNN Politics, "Trump: World would be '100%' better with Hussein, Gadhafi in power," October 25, 2015
  45. CNN Politics, "Donald Trump: Obama considering executive order to take guns away," October 20, 2015
  46. Washington Examiner, "Trump: I support Putin 'bombing the hell' out of ISIS," October 4, 2015
  47. Newsmax, "Trump: Syrian Refugees Could be a 'Trojan Horse' Set to Topple US," October 3, 2015
  48. Newsmax, "Trump Trashes Other Candidates, Praises Putin on 'O'Reilly,'" June 16, 2015
  49. The Daily Signal, "Should the NSA ‘Spying’ Program Be Illegal? What 2016 Contenders Say.," May 20, 2015
  50. The Washington Post, "About that Donald Trump speech at CPAC," February 27, 2015
  51. The Washington Times, "Donald Trump on Syria: 'Wouldn't you think it's time to stay out of one of these?'" April 29, 2013
  52. The Wall Street Journal, "Trump: We Should Take Libya's Oil," April 19, 2011
  53. Republican Party, "The 2016 Republican Party Platform," accessed August 24, 2016
  54. The Indianapolis Star, “Amid presidential speculation, Gov. Mike Pence talks foreign policy," September 11, 2014
  55. The Washington Post, "Mike Pence lays out vision for a presidential campaign. But will he be a candidate?" December 12, 2014
  56. Congress.gov, "H.Res.292," accessed April 1, 2015
  57. Congress.gov, "H.R.3162," accessed April 1, 2015
  58. Congress.gov, "H.R.3199," accessed April 1, 2015
  59. Congress.gov, "H.J.Res.114," accessed April 1, 2015
  60. The Des Moines Register, "Jill Stein in Iowa: I would not have assassinated Osama bin Laden," September 11, 2016
  61. CNN, "Jill Stein: I will have trouble sleeping at night if either Trump or Clinton is elected," August 17, 2016
  62. Political People Blog, "Dr. Jill Stein on Foreign Policy, Bernie Sanders and a 'Green New Deal,'" February 5, 2016
  63. YouTube, "Jill Stein, Green Party State of The Union Response 2015," January 21, 2015
  64. iSideWith.com, "Interview with Jill Stein," August 7, 2012
  65. Green Party, "The 2016 Green Party Platform on Democracy," accessed August 24, 2016
  66. The Hill, "Gary Johnson: I’d close Dept. of Homeland Security," September 19, 2016
  67. The Los Angeles Times, "Editorial Possible presidential spoiler Gary Johnson speaks to The Times editorial board about siphoning votes from Hillary Clinton," August 1, 2016
  68. Twitter, "Gov. Gary Johnson," June 28, 2016
  69. The Texas Tribune, "Libertarian Eyes a Third-Party Presidential Chance," April 12, 2016
  70. 70.070.1Reason.com, "Gary Johnson Talks ISIS, Refugees, Black Lives Matter and Marijuana Leglization," November 19, 2015
  71. Facebook, "Gary Johnson," August 13, 2013
  72. International Business Times, "Gary Johnson 2012: Who Is He, and What Is His Platform?" September 23, 2011
  73. Fox News, "'Hannity' Primary: Gary Johnson," May 27, 2011
  74. The Daily Caller, "Here We Go Again," March 23, 2011
  75. Libertarian Party, "The 2016 Libertarian Party Platform," accessed August 24, 2016
v  e
2016 United States Presidential Election
OverviewsPresidential Elections-2016-badge.png
Candidate profiles
Path to the presidency
Policy positions
On the campaign trail
Campaign staff
Debates
Analysis
The media's coverage of Donald TrumpThe media's coverage of Hillary Clinton

Post-debate analysis overview
Democratic:April 14, 2016 (CNN)March 9, 2016 (Univision)March 6, 2016 (CNN)February 11, 2016 (PBS)February 4, 2016 (MSNBC)January 17, 2016 (NBC)December 19, 2015 (ABC)November 14, 2015 (CBS)October 13, 2015 (CNN)
Republican:March 10, 2016 (CNN)March 3, 2016 (FNC)February 25, 2016 (CNN)February 13, 2016 (CBS)February 6, 2016 (ABC)January 28, 2016 (FNC)January 14, 2016 (FBN)December 15, 2015 (CNN)November 10, 2015 (FBN)October 28, 2015 (CNBC)September 16, 2015 (CNN)

Insiders Poll: First Democratic debate (October 13, 2015)Presidential Nominating Index: Clinton remains choice of Democratic InsidersPresidential Nominating Index: Bush remains choice of Republican InsidersInsiders Poll: Winners and losers from the Fox News Republican Debate
Ballotpedia
Editorial Content
Josh Altic, Director of ContentDaniel Anderson, Associate Director of Elections & DataCory Eucalitto, Associate Director of FeaturesRyan Byrne, Managing Editor of Ballot MeasuresMandy McConnell, Managing Editor of NewsDoug Kronaizl, Managing Editor of Local ExpansionAbbey Smith, Managing Editor of ElectionsJanie Valentine, Managing Editor of LawJoel Williams, Managing Editor of EventsJoseph Greaney, Managing Editor of PolicyAndrew BahlJaclyn BeranMarielle BrickerJoseph BrusgardEmma BurlingameKelly CoyleJon DunnVictoria EdwardsThomas EllisNicole FisherThomas GrobbenBrianna HoseaMolly KehoeTyler KingGlorie MartinezNorm Leahy, Senior EditorNathan MaxwellJimmy McAllisterBrandon McCauleyAndrew McNairEllie MikusMackenzie MurphyKaley PlatekSamantha PostAdam PowellAnnelise ReinwaldSpencer RichardsonVictoria RoseBriana RyanMyj SaintylMaddy SaluckaEmma SoukupAlexis ThackerMina VogelSamuel WonacottTrenton Woodcox