Election law changes? Our legislation tracker’s got you.Check it out!

2016 presidential candidates on government regulations

From Ballotpedia


This page was current as of the 2016 election.


Presidential Elections-2016-badge.png

2016 Presidential Election
Date:November 8, 2016

Candidates
Winner:Donald Trump (R)
Hillary Clinton (D) •Jill Stein (G) •Gary Johnson (L) •Vice presidential candidates

Election coverage
Important datesNominating processBallotpedia's 2016 Battleground PollPollsDebatesPresidential election by stateRatings and scorecards

Ballotpedia's presidential election coverage
2028202420202016

Have you subscribed yet?

Join the hundreds of thousands of readers trusting Ballotpedia to keep them up to date with the latest political news. Sign up for the Daily Brew.
Click here to learn more.


See below what the2016 presidential candidates and their respective party platforms said about government regulations.

Interested in reading more about the 2016 candidates' stances on issues related to government regulations?
Ballotpedia also covered what the candidates said aboutbudgets,Wall Street and banking policy,trade, andfederal assistance programs.

OVERVIEW OF CANDIDATE POSITIONS
  • Hillary Clinton supports tightening Wall Street regulations and believes theAffordable Care Act and Dodd-Frank are moving the country in the right direction.
  • Donald Trump has described government regulation as a “stealth tax" and says government regulations should be pared back to ensure their benefits outweigh their costs. He wants to repeal theAffordable Care Act and believes that CEO salaries and bonuses cannot be regulated.
  • Jill Stein believes the public lacks confidence in regulatory agencies such as theFDA and is critical of the Dodd-Frank Act.
  • Gary Johnson advocates for a free market economy and would be willing to use executive authority instead of relying on Congress to advanceLibertarian objectives. He supports environmental regulation and mandatory nutrition labels.
  • Democratic candidate

    Democratic Party Hillary Clinton

    caption
    • Commenting on the planned merger of AT&T and Time Warner in October 2016, Clinton spokesman Brian Fallon said, "In general, we think that marketplace competition is a good and healthy thing for consumers and so there’s a number of questions and concerns that arise in that vein about this announced deal but there’s still a lot of information that needs to come out before, before any conclusions should be reached. Certainly, [Clinton] thinks that regulators should scrutinize it closely.”[1]
    • On December 9, 2015, Clinton said that, if elected president, she would use the regulatory authority of theU.S. Department of the Treasury to curb the number of corporate inversions if Congress did not act. “This is not only about fairness. This is about patriotism. If Congress won’t act, then I will ask the Treasury Department, when I’m there, to use its regulatory authority, if that’s what it takes,” she said during a campaign stop inIowa. She also said she backs an “exit tax” that would penalize mergers between U.S. companies and foreign corporations structured to reduce their taxes, a move known as a tax inversion. The plan comes after New York-based drug company Pfizer announced in November announcement of a plan to merge Ireland-based Allergan. The move would enable Pfizer to reduce its tax rate from around 25 percent in 2015 to about 18 percent. Ireland's lower corporate tax rate would have saved Pfizer nearly $1 billion of the $3.1 billion in U.S. taxes it paid in 2014, according to theAssociated Press.[2][3][4]
    Republicans Want to Reverse Our Progress, released in November 12, 2015
    • Clinton’s campaign released a video on November 12, 2015, attacking the Republican candidates for seeking to roll back President Obama’s policies, in a peek at how the Democratic frontrunner would contrast herself with the GOP in a general election, TIME reported.[5]
    • On October 8, 2015, Clinton wrote an op-ed forBloomberg detailing her proposals for Wall Street reform. Clinton recommended protecting the Dodd-Frank Act, eliminating the carried interest tax loophole, imposing a “risk fee” on banks with more than $50 billion in assets and enacting a “high-frequency trading” tax.[6][7]
    • On August 31, 2015, Clinton co-wrote an op-ed in The Huffington Post with U.S. Sen.Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.) promoting a new bill that would prohibit employers in the private sector from offering bonuses to departing employees who join the government.[8]
    The 2016 Democratic Party Platform on government regulations
    Reining in Wall Street and Fixing our Financial System

    To restore economic fairness, Democrats will fight against the greed and recklessness of WallStreet. Wall Street cannot be an island unto itself, gambling trillions in risky financialinstruments and making huge profits, all the while thinking that taxpayers will be there to bailthem out again. We must tackle dangerous risks in big banks and elsewhere in the financialsystem. We must make Wall Street work for the job-creating, productive economy—includingby making loans more affordable for small- and medium-sized businesses. We need to prohibitWall Street from picking and choosing which credit agency will rate its products as well as fromimposing excessive fees on consumers. And we must hold both individuals and corporationsaccountable when they break the law. Democrats believe that no bank can be too big to fail andno executive too powerful to jail. Democrats will support stronger criminal laws and civilpenalties for Wall Street criminals who prey on the public trust. We also support extending thestatute of limitations for prosecuting major financial fraud, and providing the Department ofJustice, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Commodity Futures TradingCommission more resources to prosecute wrongdoing. “Equal Justice Under Law” will not justbe words engraved on the entrance of the Supreme Court. It will be the standard that applies toWall Street and all Americans.

    We will also vigorously implement, enforce, and build on President Obama’s landmark Dodd-Frankfinancial reform law, and we will stop dead in its tracks every Republican effort to weakenit. We will stop Republican efforts to hamstring our regulators through budget cuts, and we willensure they have the resources and independence to fully enforce the law and hold bothindividuals and corporations accountable when they break the rules. We will also continue toprotect consumers and defend the CFPB from Republican attacks. We oppose any efforts tochange the CFPB’s structure from a single director to a partisan, gridlocked Commission andlikewise oppose any efforts to remove the Bureau’s independent funding and subject it to theappropriations process. Democrats will also continue to support the CFPB in enforcingfoundational civil rights laws protecting against discrimination in consumer lending. Democratscondemn predatory payday lending, and will protect consumers by defending the CFPB andimplementing strong new regulations.

    Our goal must be to create a financial system and an economy that works for all Americans, notjust a handful of billionaires. We support a financial transactions tax on Wall Street to curbexcessive speculation and high-frequency trading, which has threatened financial markets. Weacknowledge that there is room within our party for a diversity of views on a broader financialtransactions tax.

    Democrats will not hesitate to use and expand existing authorities as well as empower regulatorsto downsize or break apart financial institutions when necessary to protect the public andsafeguard financial stability, including new authorities to go after risky shadow-bankingactivities. Banks should not be able to gamble with taxpayers’ deposits or pose an undue risk toMain Street. Democrats support a variety of ways to stop this from happening, including anupdated and modernized version of Glass-Steagall as well as breaking up too-big-to-fail financialinstitutions that pose a systemic risk to the stability of our economy.

    We believe that personnel is policy. We will nominate and appoint regulators and officials whoare not beholden to the industries they regulate—people with a track record of standing up topower and safeguarding the public trust. We will crack down on the revolving door betweenthe private sector—particularly Wall Street—and the federal government. We will ban goldenparachutes for those taking government jobs. We will limit conflicts of interest by requiring bankand corporate regulators to recuse themselves from official work on particular matters that woulddirectly benefit their former employers. And we will bar financial service regulators fromlobbying their former colleagues for at least two years.

    We will protect and defend the Federal Reserve’s independence to carry out the dual mandateassigned to it by Congress—for both full employment and low inflation—against threats fromnew legislation. We will also reform the Federal Reserve to make it more representative ofAmerica as a whole, and we will fight to enhance its independence by ensuring that executives offinancial institutions are not allowed to serve on the boards of regional Federal Reserve banks orto select members of those boards.

    At a time when many of the largest banks have shunned communities across America,Democrats believe that we need to give Americans affordable banking options, including byempowering the United States Postal Service to facilitate the delivery of basic banking services.[10]

    —2016 Democratic Party Platform[11]

    Republican candidate

    Republican Party Donald Trump

    caption
    • Donald Trump said he wants to repeal the Affordable Care Act with something he dubbed "Donaldcare,"Breitbart reported September 15, 2015. “We’re going to get rid of Obamacare,” Trump told Breitbart after a giving a speech to Veterans for a Strong America—which just endorsed his candidacy for the White House. “We’re going to something really spectacular with that [healthcare], with immigration, with the armed forces,” Trump said.[12]
    • On September 13, 2015, Trump called rising CEO salaries “a total and complete joke.” He said, "It's very hard if you have a free enterprise system to do anything about that. You know the boards of companies are supposed to do it but I know companies very well and the CEO puts in all his friends...and they get whatever they want you know because their friends love sitting on the board. That's the system that we have and it's a shame and it’s disgraceful.”[13]
    • When endorsingMitt Romney in the 2012 presidential election, Trump commented in an op-ed inThe Washington Times, "Right now, government regulations cost us annually $1.75 trillion. They constitute a stealth tax that is larger than the amount theInternal Revenue Service collects every year from corporations and individuals combined. In just three years, Mr.Obama has added hugely to the annual regulatory bill." Trump supported a candidate that would "pare that back and make sure every single regulation has benefits that outweigh costs and that they don’t kill U.S. jobs."[14]
    • In his 2000 book,The America We Deserve, Trump wrote, "Most of us think the American Dream is a birthright, but without constant care and vigilance, it can and will be whittled down to nothing. The threatening agent is not some foreign power, but people who don’t understand the proper relationship between the public and private arenas. In other words, the greatest threat to the American Dream is the idea that dreamers need close government scrutiny and control. Job one for us is to make sure the public sector does a limited job, and no more."[15]
    The 2016 Republican Party Platform on government regulations
    Freeing Financial Markets

    The Republican vision for American bankingcalls for establishing transparent, efficient marketswhere consumers can obtain loans they need at reasonablerates based on market conditions. Unfortunately,in response to the financial institutions crisisof 2008-2009, the Democratic-controlled Congressenacted the Wall Street Reform and Consumer ProtectionAct, otherwise known as Dodd-Frank. Theydid not let the crisis go to waste but used it as anexcuse to establish unprecedented governmentcontrol over the nation’s financial markets. The consequenceshave been bad for everyone except federalregulators.

    Rather than address the cause of the crisis —the government’s own housing policies — the newlaw extended government control over the economyby creating new unaccountable bureaucracies.Predictably, central planning of our financial sectorhas not created jobs, it has killed them. It has notlimited risks, it has created more. It has not encouragedeconomic growth, it has shackled it.

    Since the enactment of Dodd-Frank, the numberof community banks has significantly declined,and the cost and complexity of complying withthe law has created impediments to the remainingbanks’ ability to support the customers they serve.From 13,000 community banks in 1985, only 1,900remain. Still, the majority of agricultural loans andsmall business loans are made by community banks.From start-ups foregone to home loans not made,Dodd-Frank’s excessive regulation and burdensomerequirements have helped contribute to theslow economy we all endure today under PresidentObama and the Democrats.

    Community banks are essential to ensuringsmall businesses have easy and affordable accessto the capital they need to grow and prosper.Community banks should be relieved of excessiveregulations. We support removing roadblocks andregulations that prevent access to capital.The worst of Dodd-Frank is the ConsumerFinancial Protection Bureau, deliberately designedto be a rogue agency. It answers to neither Congressnor the executive, has its own guaranteed fundingoutside the appropriations process, and uses itsslush fund to steer settlements to politically favoredgroups.

    Its Director has dictatorial powers unique in theAmerican Republic. Its regulatory harassment oflocal and regional banks, the source of most homemortgages and small business loans, advantagesbig banks and makes it harder for Americans to buya home. Its one-size-fits-all approach to every issuethreatens the diversity of the country’s financial systemand would leave us with just a few enormousinstitutions, as in many European countries.

    If the Bureau is not abolished, it should be subjectedto congressional appropriation. In that way,consumer protection in the financial markets can beadvanced through measures that are both effectiveand constitutional. Any settlements arising fromstatutory violations by financial institutions must beused to make whole the harmed consumers, withany remaining proceeds given to the general Treasury.Diversion of settlement funds to politically connectedparties should be a criminal offense.

    Republicans believe that no financial institutionis too big to fail. We support legislation to ensurethat the problems of any financial institution can beresolved through the Bankruptcy Code. We endorseprudent regulation of the banking system to ensurethat FDIC-regulated banks are properly capitalizedand taxpayers are protected against bailouts. Wewill end the government’s use of disparate impacttheory in enforcing anti-discrimination laws with regardto lending.[10]

    —2016 Republican Party Platform[16]

    Green candidate

    Green Party Jill Stein

    Jill-Stein-circle.png
    • Discussing vaccines, Stein said that the public lacks confidence in the agencies that regulate them because they are influenced by corporate lobbyists.[17]
    • "Vaccines are an invaluable medication," Stein toldThe Washington Post. But, "like any medication they also should be approved by a regulatory board that people can trust. And I think, right now, that is the problem — that people do not trust a Food and Drug Administration, or even the CDC for that matter, where corporate influence and the pharmaceutical industry has a lot of influence."[17]
    • Stein has expressed skepticism about theFood and Drug Administration and other agencies that regulate agriculture and pharmaceuticals because she believes that lobbyists have too great an impact on their decision making.[17]
    • During a speech in New York City in 2012 marking the first anniversary of Occupy Wall Street, Stein told the crowd that America is at a breaking point and that it was “time to turn that breaking point into a tipping point.” She also criticized the Dodd-Frank Act as “gutless, toothless, and useless.”[18]
    • Read more of Jill Stein's public statements on 2016 campaign issues.
    The 2016 Green Party Platform on government regulations
    C. Curbing Corporate Power

    OUR POSITION

    Greens want to reduce the economic and political power of large corporations, end corporate personhood and re-design corporations to serve our society, democracy and the environment.

    Unelected and unaccountable corporate executives are not merely exercising power in our society — they are ruling us. Greens will reduce corporate powers and privileges, including by stripping them of artificial "personhood" and constitutional protections. The Green Party supports strong and effectively enforced antitrust laws and regulation to counteract the concentration of economic and political power that imposes a severe toll on people, places and the planet.

    Greens believe the legal structure of the corporation is obsolete. At present, corporations are designed solely to generate profit. This legal imperative — profit above all else — is damaging our country and our planet in countless ways. We must change the legal design of corporations so that they generate profits, but not at the expense of the environment, human rights, public health, workers, or the communities in which the corporation operates.

    One point remains unequivocal: our planet cannot afford business as usual any longer. Because corporations have become the dominant economic institution of the planet, we must compel them to serve human and environmental needs, so that our peoples, nations and environment may live long and prosper.

    GREEN SOLUTIONS

    1. End corporate personhood. A key first step will be federal and state constitutional amendments abolishing the legal fiction of corporate personhood.

    2. Federal chartering of corporations that includes comprehensive, strict and enforceable social responsibility requirements.

    3. Strengthen the civil justice system to ensure that it holds corporations strictly liable for corporate crime, fraud, violence and malfeasance. This would include revoking the charters of corporations that routinely violate safety, health, environmental protection or other laws.

    4. Empower shareholders to stop abuses by the managers they hire through a structure of democratic governance and elections.

    5. Enforce existing antitrust laws and support even tougher new ones to curtail the overwhelming economic and political power of large corporations.

    6. Increase funding for and strengthen oversight of federal antitrust enforcement.

    ...

    K. Anti-Trust Enforcement

    The Green Party supports strong and effectively enforced anti-trust regulation to counteract the concentration of economic power that imposes a severe toll on the economy. The anti-trust division of the Justice Department has had its scope and powers reduced. An explosion of unregulated mergers and acquisitions, spinoffs, and leveraged buy-outs has overwhelmed the federal government's capacity to provide effective oversight. Financial and trading markets have become particularly vulnerable to insider trading. Securities and Exchange Commission regulation of these markets has seriously fallen short. Overall, what we see in unchecked market power is self-serving abuse of the democratic political process, price gouging, loss of productivity and jobs, reduced competitiveness, and of predatory and monopolistic practices.

    1. The Federal Trade Commission must vigorously oversee mergers where the combined sales of the companies exceeds $1 billion.

    2. The Justice Department must redefine"relevant market share" in assessing mergers.

    3. The Congress must enact its calls for competitiveness by stopping illegal monopolistic practices.

    4. We oppose the largesse of government in the form of massive corporate entitlements.[10]

    —2016 Green Party Platform[19]

    Libertarian candidate

    Libertarian Party Gary Johnson

    Gary-Johnson-(New Mexico)-circle.png
    • In an article examiningGary Johnson’s issue positions, Max Ehrenfreund ofThe Washington Post wrote that Johnson “is much more willing to compromise on questions about the size of government than the more doctrinaire Libertarian candidates of the past. … [H]e supportsenvironmental regulation, and he would be willing to use executive authority to achieve Libertarian objectives rather than relying on Congress.”[20]
    The 2016 Libertarian Party Platform on government regulations
    2.0 Economic Liberty

    Libertarians want all members of society to have abundant opportunities to achieve economic success. A free and competitive market allocates resources in the most efficient manner. Each person has the right to offer goods and services to others on the free market. The only proper role of government in the economic realm is to protect property rights, adjudicate disputes, and provide a legal framework in which voluntary trade is protected. All efforts by government to redistribute wealth, or to control or manage trade, are improper in a free society.[10]

    —2016 Libertarian Party Platform[23]

    Withdrawn candidates

    Recent news

    The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the termsPresidential candidates government regulations 2016. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

    See also

    Footnotes

    1. CBS News, "Where do Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump stand on the AT&T-Time Warner merger?" October 24, 2016
    2. AP:The Big Story, "Clinton offers new 'exit tax' on US-foreign company mergers," December 7, 2015
    3. The Wall Street Journal, "Hillary Clinton Talks Tough on Executive Action," December 9, 2015
    4. The Hill, "Clinton floats executive action crackdown on corporations," December 9, 2015
    5. TIME, "First Look on TIME: How Hillary Clinton Is Targeting Republican Candidates," November 12, 2015
    6. Bloomberg, "My Plan to Prevent the Next Crash," October 8, 2015
    7. Business Insider, "Here's Hillary Clinton's plan to take on Wall Street," October 8, 2015
    8. The Huffington Post, "To Restore Trust in Government, Slow Wall Street's Revolving Door," August 31, 2015
    9. Congress.gov, "S.2126 - Family Entertainment Protection Act," accessed July 26, 2015
    10. 10.010.110.210.3Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
    11. Democratic Party, "The 2016 Democratic Party Platform," accessed August 23, 2016
    12. Breitbart, "Donald Trump: Free Market ‘Donaldcare’ Will Replace Obamacare After Its Repeal," September 15, 2015
    13. CBS News, "Donald Trump on CEO pay: It's a 'complete joke'," September 13, 2015
    14. The Washington Times, "Trump: No one's apprentice," February 7, 2012
    15. Trump, Donald. (2000).The America We Deserve. Los Angeles, CA: Renaissance Books. (pages 44-45)
    16. [1-ben_1468872234.pdfGOP.com, "Republican Platform 2016," July 18, 2016]
    17. 17.017.117.2The Washington Post, "What Jill Stein, the Green presidential candidate, wants to do to America," August 2, 2016
    18. The New Yorker, "THE OCCUPY CANDIDATE," September 19, 2012
    19. The Green Party of the United States, "Platform," August 6, 2016
    20. The Washington Post, "What Gary Johnson, the Libertarian nominee for president, wants to do to America," July 5, 2016
    21. 21.021.121.2Scott Holleran, "Interview with Gary Johnson," August 21, 2011
    22. Library of Economics and Liberty, "Milton Friedman," accessed January 6, 2016
    23. Libertarian Party, "Libertarian Party Platform," May 27, 2016
    v  e
    2016 United States Presidential Election
    OverviewsPresidential Elections-2016-badge.png
    Candidate profiles
    Path to the presidency
    Policy positions
    On the campaign trail
    Campaign staff
    Debates
    Analysis
    The media's coverage of Donald TrumpThe media's coverage of Hillary Clinton

    Post-debate analysis overview
    Democratic:April 14, 2016 (CNN)March 9, 2016 (Univision)March 6, 2016 (CNN)February 11, 2016 (PBS)February 4, 2016 (MSNBC)January 17, 2016 (NBC)December 19, 2015 (ABC)November 14, 2015 (CBS)October 13, 2015 (CNN)
    Republican:March 10, 2016 (CNN)March 3, 2016 (FNC)February 25, 2016 (CNN)February 13, 2016 (CBS)February 6, 2016 (ABC)January 28, 2016 (FNC)January 14, 2016 (FBN)December 15, 2015 (CNN)November 10, 2015 (FBN)October 28, 2015 (CNBC)September 16, 2015 (CNN)

    Insiders Poll: First Democratic debate (October 13, 2015)Presidential Nominating Index: Clinton remains choice of Democratic InsidersPresidential Nominating Index: Bush remains choice of Republican InsidersInsiders Poll: Winners and losers from the Fox News Republican Debate
    Ballotpedia
    Editorial Content
    Josh Altic, Director of ContentDaniel Anderson, Associate Director of Elections & DataCory Eucalitto, Associate Director of FeaturesRyan Byrne, Managing Editor of Ballot MeasuresMandy McConnell, Managing Editor of NewsDoug Kronaizl, Managing Editor of Local ExpansionAbbey Smith, Managing Editor of ElectionsJanie Valentine, Managing Editor of LawJoel Williams, Managing Editor of EventsJoseph Greaney, Managing Editor of PolicyAndrew BahlJaclyn BeranMarielle BrickerJoseph BrusgardEmma BurlingameKelly CoyleJon DunnVictoria EdwardsThomas EllisNicole FisherThomas GrobbenBrianna HoseaMolly KehoeTyler KingGlorie MartinezNorm Leahy, Senior EditorNathan MaxwellJimmy McAllisterBrandon McCauleyAndrew McNairEllie MikusMackenzie MurphyKaley PlatekSamantha PostAdam PowellAnnelise ReinwaldSpencer RichardsonVictoria RoseBriana RyanMyj SaintylMaddy SaluckaEmma SoukupAlexis ThackerMina VogelSamuel WonacottTrenton Woodcox