Eating with our eyes (closed): Effects of visually associating animals with meat on antivegan/vegetarian attitudes and meat consumption willingness

@article{Earle2019EatingWO,  title={Eating with our eyes (closed): Effects of visually associating animals with meat on antivegan/vegetarian attitudes and meat consumption willingness},  author={Megan Earle and Gordon Hodson and Kristof Dhont and Cara C. MacInnis},  journal={Group Processes \& Intergroup Relations},  year={2019},  volume={22},  pages={818 - 835},  url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:164266896}}
Negative attitudes toward vegetarians/vegans (i.e., veg*ns) are common, particularly among those who desire/like/consume meat more. In two studies, we replicated and extended past work, showing that visual reminders of meat’s animal origins (vs. images of meat alone) decreased meat consumption willingness via increased empathy for animals, distress about meat consumption, and disgust for meat. We also assessed how animal–meat reminders influence antiveg*n attitudes. In Study 1 (N = 299… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

40 Citations

Intergroup attitudes between meat-eaters and meat-avoiders: The role of dietary ingroup identification

Why might some meat-eaters and meat-avoiders express negative attitudes toward each other? We investigated intergroup attitudes and potential underpinnings of these attitudes across three different

Red meat, reactance and political party: Defensive processing of empathy-based meat reduction appeals.

Reduction of red meat consumption is urgently needed, but there is concern that meat-reduction appeals may lead to reactance. Across three studies (total N = 2978), two of which were preregistered,

Butchers' and deli workers' psychological adaptation to meat.

Significant reductions in disgust, empathy, and meat-animal association are observed within the first year or 2 of meat handling for all types of meat.

The Role of State and Trait Emotional Empathy Toward Animals in the Associations of Dissociation and Meat Consumption

Many people enjoy eating meat but dislike the harming of animals that it entails. Dissociating meat from its animal origins has been identified as a powerful way to avoid cognitive dissonance

The Association Between Selfishness, Animal-Oriented Empathy, Three Meat Reduction Motivations (Animal, Health, and Environment), Gender, and Meat Consumption

This study examined how the level of meat consumption was related to two psychological factors, selfishness and animal-oriented empathy, and three motivations related to animal, health, and

56 References

It ain’t easy eating greens: Evidence of bias toward vegetarians and vegans from both source and target

Vegetarianism and veganism are increasingly prevalent in Western countries, yet anecdotal expressions of negativity toward vegetarians and vegans are common. We empirically tested whether bias exists

The Psychology of Eating Animals

Most people both eat animals and care about animals. Research has begun to examine the psychological processes that allow people to negotiate this “meat paradox.” To understand the psychology of
...

Related Papers

Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers