Connectionism, Systematicity, and the Frame Problem

@article{Haselager1998ConnectionismSA,  title={Connectionism, Systematicity, and the Frame Problem},  author={W.F.G. Haselager and J. F. H. van Rappard},  journal={Minds and Machines},  year={1998},  volume={8},  pages={161-179},  url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:12016883}}
It is concluded that the frame problem provides a difficulty to connectionism that is no less serious than the obstacle it constitutes for classical cognitive science.

23 Citations

Author ' s personal copy Connectionist semantic systematicity

This work presents a connectionist model of sentence comprehension that does not implement a symbol system yet behaves systematically, and argues that this systematicity arises robustly and in a psychologically plausible manner because it depends on structure inherent in the world.

Cognitive science, representations and dynamical systems theory

It is proposed that the dynamical systems theory approach, emphasizing the embodied embedded nature of cognition, might provide an important, non-representational alternative to the traditional representational cravings of cognitive science.

Problems of Connectionism

The relationship between philosophy and science has always been complementary. Today, while science moves increasingly fast and philosophy shows some problems in catching up with it, it is not always

What active inference still can’t do The (frame) problem that just won’t go away

The frame problem, or problem of relevance, concerns the capacity of cognitive agents to zero in on relevant information during action and perception, whilst intelligently ignoring everything else.

La dualidad del Problema de marco: Sobre interpretaciones y resoluciones

Broadly construed as a problem related to relevance, the frame problem has been the center of important debates and controversies in the decades of the 80’ and 90’. The key issue of this article will

TWO KINDS OF COMMON SENSE KNOWLEDGE (AND A CONSTRAINT FOR MACHINE CONSCIOUSNESS DESIGN)

In this paper, it will be argued that common sense knowledge has not a unitary structure. It is rather articulated at two different levels: a deep and a superficial level of common sense. The deep

61 References

THE CONSTITUENT STRUCTURE OF CONNECTIONIST MENTAL STATES: A REPLY TO FODOR AND PYLYSHYN

The primary purpose of this article is to reply to the central point of (1988) critique of connectionism. The direct reply to their critique comprises Section 2 of this paper. In short, I argue that

Connectionism and the problem of systematicity

It is argued that Connectionism potentially has an explanation for the acquisition of systematic behaviour, which is an issue not addressed in the Classical paradigm since systematicity is built into a Classical architecture.

Connectionism, classical cognitivism and the relation between cognitive and implementational levels of analysis

Abstract This paper discusses the relation between cognitive and implementational levels of analysis. Chalmers (1990, 1993) argues that a connectionist implementation of a classical cognitive

Connectionism and compositionality: Why Fodor and Pylyshyn were wrong

Abstract This paper offers a theoretical and an experimental perspective on the relationship between connectionist and classical (symbol‐processing) models. A structural flaw in Fodor and Pylyshyn's

Classical Questions, Radical Answers: Connectionism and the Structure of Mental Representations

The many and obvious contrasts between Connectionism and (something like) “most other work in Cognitive Science” often give rise to rather grandiose talk of scientific upheaval. Thus it is common to

Compositionality: A Connectionist Variation on a Classical Theme

It is demonstrated that Connectionist representations can be compositional without being Classical, and that Fodor and Pylyshyn's supposedly conclusive arguments in favor of the Classical approach do not in fact support that approach over the Connectionist alternative.

Connectionism and the Philosophy of Psychology

Introduction and overview the fundamental assumptions of classical cognitive science: classical cognitive science - representations and rules, Marr's framework for classical cognitive science and the

Philosophy and Connectionist Theory

This book discusses Connectionism, Connectionism and Other Styles of Cognitive Modeling, and the Philosophical Implications of Connectionism.
...

Related Papers

Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers