  |
はてなキーワード:willとは
2016年10月版にも入ってるみたいだけど、2016年ってコロナ前じゃね？
1.3.3.4 Brand Protection and Use of theVisa-Owned Marks
A Member must not use theVisa-Owned Marks:
• Inany manner thatmay bring theVisa-Owned Marks orVisa Inc. orits affiliates into disrepute
• In relation to, or for the purchase or trade of, photographs, video imagery,computer-generated images,cartoons, simulation, orany other media oractivities including, but not limited to,any of the following:
- Child pornography
- Bestiality
- Rape (orany other non-consensual sexual behavior)
- Non-consensual mutilation of a person orbody part
A Member thatdoes not complywith these requirementswill be subject to non-compliance assessments prescribed under the Global Brand Protection Program and/or, in theEuropeRegion, the Electronic Commerce Merchant Monitoring Program.
Let’s faceit: starting a conversationon a dating app canfeel terrifying.You seesomeoneyou’re interested in,you typeout amessage, and then…youdeleteit. “Is this too boring?” “Will they even respond?” “What if I sound awkward?”
We’veall been there. That firstmessage canmake orbreakyour chances ofconnecting withsomeone amazing. Buthere’s thegood news:youdon’t have tooverthink it.With the rightopeningline,you canspark a conversation thatfeelsnatural,fun, and meaningful.
AtMixerDates, webelieve that every greatconnection starts with a great conversation. That’swhy we’ve puttogether this guide to helpyoucraft the best dating appopeninglines—ones that standout, showyour personality, andlead to realconnections. Ready to ditch the “hey” and start making animpact?Let’sdive in!
[:contents]
Before weget into the bestopeninglines,let’stalk aboutwhyyour firstmessageis so important.
Youropeninglineisyour chance tomake a greatfirst impression.It’s thegateway to a conversation that couldlead tosomething special. A thoughtful,creativemessage shows thatyou’re genuinely interested—not just swiping mindlessly.
Your firstmessage sets thetone for the entire conversation. A boring orgenericopener mightlead to a dull chat, while afun or intriguingone canspark excitement andcuriosity.
Let’s be real: everyonelovesfeeling special. Whenyou put effort intoyouropeningline,it shows thatyou care enough to standout. AndonMixerDates, where wevalue authenticity and positivity, that effortgoes a long way.
Now,let’sget to thegood stuff—the best dating appopeninglines that actually work. These are divided intocategories to suit different personalities and situations.
Whilethe examples above are great starting points, the bestopeninglines are theones thatfeel authentic toyou.Here are sometips to helpyoucraftyour own:
Referencesomething from theirprofile—aphoto, a hobby, or ashared interest.It showsyou’re payingattention and not just copying and pasting.
Avoid heavy oroverly serious topics right off the bat. Keep thetonelight and playful tomake the conversation enjoyable.
Don’ttry to besomeoneyou’re not. Ifyou’renaturallyfunny, lean into that. Ifyou’remore thoughtful,go for asincere compliment or question.
“Hey” or “What’s up?” might be easy, but they’re also forgettable. Put in alittle effort to standout.
This gives the other person an easy way to respond and keeps the conversation flowing.
AtMixerDates, we’reall about creating a positive,inclusive space whereyou canfeel comfortablebeingyourself.Here’swhy our platformis the best place to put theseopeninglines into practice:
We welcome everyone, no matterwhoyou are orwhoyoulove. Our platformis designed to be a safe space whereyou canconnect withlike-minded people.
Our users create detailedprofiles thatmakeit easy to findshared interests andcraft personalizedopeninglines.
We encourage our community to be genuine and kind, soyou canfeel confident starting conversations withoutfear of judgment or rejection.
Don’t justtake ourword forit—here’s whatone of our users had to say:
“I met my partneronMixerDates, anditallstarted with asimplemessage about oursharedlove for travel. The conversation flowednaturally, and therestishistory. I’m so grateful for this platform!”
While a greatopeningline canspark a conversation,building a realconnectiontakesmore than just a clevermessage.Here are thekeyelements tolook for when seeking a meaningfulconnection:
A strongconnection starts with alignmenton the things that mattermost. Doyoushare similarvalues,lifegoals, or visions forthe future?
Look forsomeonewhoiswilling toshare their thoughts,feelings, and vulnerabilities—andwho encouragesyou to do the same.
Healthy relationships are atwo-way street. Both people should be putting in effort to communicate, plan dates, and support each other.
Atrueconnectionallows both people to be themselves without judgment.Look forsomeonewho celebratesyour uniqueness and encouragesyou to pursueyour passions.
Communicationis the foundation ofany strong relationship. A mutualconnection thrivesonhonesty, transparency, and the ability to resolve conflicts in ahealthy way.
AtMixerDates, we’rehere to helpyou find thesekeyelements in a partner. Our platformis designed toconnectyou with peoplewhoshareyourvaluesand arelooking for the same thingsyou are. Starting a conversationon a dating app doesn’t have to be stressful.With the rightopeningline,you canspark aconnection thatfeelsnatural,fun, and meaningful.And atMixerDates, we’rehere to helpyou everystep of the way.
So, what areyou waiting for?Craft that perfectopeningline,joinMixerDates, and startconnecting with peoplewhovalue authenticity and positivity.Your perfectmatchisout there—and they’re justonemessageaway.
Firstdates can be exciting and nerve-wrackingallatonce.You’re meetingsomeone new, learning about their interests, and trying to figureout if there’schemistrybetweenyou. And then there’s flirting, that delicate dance of showingsomeoneyou’re interested withoutbeing too forward or awkward.
Flirtingdoesn’t have to be a high-pressuresituation. Infact,it can bethe mostfun part ofgetting to knowsomeone. Whetheryou're meetingsomeoneonMixerDates orany other platform,the most important thingis to be genuine,staycalm, and let theconnection developnaturally.
Ifyou’ve everfoundyourself wondering how to flirton a firstdate withoutfeeling uncomfortable,you’re notalone. Everyonehas their awkwardmoments, but themoreyou understand theart of flirting, the easierit becomes. In thisarticle, we’llbreak down how to flirt in a way thatfeelsnatural, exciting,and authentic towhoyou are. So, let'sdive in and learn how tomakethe most ofyour firstdate experience—withoutoverthinkingit.
Whenit comes to flirting, confidenceiskey. But whatdoesit really mean to be confidenton a firstdate? Confidencedoesn’t meanyouneed to be perfect, or evenoutgoing—it simply meansbeing comfortable inyour ownskin and showing upasyour authentic self.
Haveyou ever noticed how people are drawn to thosewho radiate self-assurance?It’s not aboutbragging or dominating the conversation—it’s about presentingyourself with ease. Ifyoufeelgood aboutyourself,itwillnaturally show. A greatsmile,good posture, and eye contact cango a long way in making agoodfirst impression.
For instance, think about thelasttimesomeone walked into a room and immediately caughtyourattention—not because they werethe mostattractive person in the room, but because of their energy. They were confident, they were present, and theymadeyoufeelat ease. That’s the kind of confidenceyou want to projectonyourdate.
Whenyou're confident,you're not worried about saying the perfect thing. Instead,youfocuson enjoying themoment, making the other personfeel comfortable, and letting theconnection happennaturally. That’s themagic of confidence—itallowsyou to be present,fun, and,most importantly,yourself.
Let’s faceit—noonewants tofeellike they’rebeing “worked” or put through a game. That’swhy subtletyis such a powerfultool whenit comes to flirting.It'sall about showing interest withoutbeingover-the-top or too obvious.
Flirtingdoesn’talways mean complimentingsomeone non-stop or using cheesy pickup lines. Infact,the most successful flirtingis the kind that happens behind the scenes—subtle, playful, andlighthearted. Think about thelittlemoments,like a teasing comment about how theyalways order the same thingat a restaurant or the wayyou laughat a silly joke theymake.
Thekeyis to find a balance. Asimplesmile or a playful comment can convey interest withoutbeing too much. For example, ifyourdate tellsyou theylove hiking but theytend togetlost easily,you could saysomethinglike, “So,you’re telling meyouneed a personal guide? I couldget behind that!”It’slighthearted, humorous, andmost importantly,it keeps the conversationfun without putting too much pressureon thesituation.
By keepingit subtle,youallowyourdate tofeelat ease.Ittakes the pressure off them to be perfectand allows both ofyou to enjoy the interactionmorenaturally. Flirtingdoesn’tneed to be a performance—it’s about creating an environment where both ofyou canfeel comfortableand authentic.
Now,let’stalk aboutsomething incredibly important in the flirting game:active listening. When we’reon adate, we oftenget caught up in thinking about what to saynext, how we’re coming across, or if we’rebeing interesting enough. But the best way tomake animpression? Truly listening toyourdate.
Active listening meansyou’re fullyengaged in the conversation, givingyourdateyour fullattention and responding thoughtfully.It’s about showing thatyou care about what they’re saying and thatyou’re genuinely interested ingetting to know them better. Whenyou listenactively,you’re also giving them space toopen up, and that can create an immediateconnection.
For example, ifyourdate mentions they recently traveled toJapan, instead of simply saying, “That’scool!”you could follow up withsomethinglike, “Whatwasthe most memorable experienceyou had there?” This shows thatyou’re not just hearing their words but are genuinely curious and invested in their experiences.It’s a great way to build rapport and let them knowyou’re not just there toimpress them—you’re there toconnect.
Whileyour words are important,body language often speaks louder thananythingyou can say. Whetheryourealizeit or not,yourbodyis constantly communicating howyoufeel. Howyousit, stand, andmove tellsyourdate whetheryou’rerelaxed,engaged, or distracted.
Small gestures cango a long way in flirting. Alight touchon thearm, a subtle lean in when they’re speaking, or maintaininggood eye contact—all thesebody language cues helpsignalyour interest. Andthe great thingis, whendonenaturally, these cues can be justas effectiveas words.
For example, ifyou’resittingat a caféonyourdate andyou lean in slightly when they’re sharing afunnystory,you’re not just showing thatyou’re interested—you’re inviting them intoyour space.It’s aninvitation toconnect further. And when they respondby leaning in too, that’s when themagic happens—the unspokenconnection that tellsyou both that there’s potential formore.
Flirting throughbody languagedoesn’t mean making grand gestures orbeingoverly touchy.It’s aboutbeing present and showing thatyou’reengagedwith yourdate in a subtle, but meaningful way.
It’s easy toget caught up inoverthinking how to flirt or trying to figureout ifyourdateis intoyou. Buthere’s asecret—whenyou letgo of the pressureand allowyourself to havefun,everything flows muchmorenaturally. Flirtingon a firstdatedoesn’tneed tofeellike atest or anassignment.It’s supposed to be afun,lighthearted experience that sets the stage formore greatdates ahead.
Whenwas thelasttimeyou had a genuinelyfundate?Wasit whenyou were trying too hard toimpress, or whenyou were both laughing, chatting, and enjoying each other's company? Flirting becomes effortless whenyou're present, enjoying themoment, and letting theconnection grownaturally.
Sometimes,it's the smallmoments—like sharing a laugh or swapping embarrassing stories—thatmake a firstdate truly special. Whenyoufocuson havingfun,you create an environment where both ofyou canrelax, flirt, and let thechemistry grow. That’s thesecret to a greatdate.
One of the best things about using a platformlikeMixerDatesis thatittakes the guessworkout of the equation.Byconnecting withsomeonewho already sharesyour interests and values,you’vegot a head starton making a realconnection.No more swiping through countless profiles hoping for aspark—onMixerDates,you already know there’ssomething incommon.
Whenyou’re alreadyon the same pagewith yourdate, flirting comesmore easily. There’s less of that awkward, “Are we evenon the same wavelength?”feeling, andmore of thefun, “Wow, we reallyclick!” vibe. Whetheryou’retalking aboutfavorite hobbies, movies, orlifegoals, the conversation flowsnaturally, making the flirtingfeel effortless.
Ifyou're looking for a place to meetlike-minded people and build genuineconnections,MixerDatesis the perfect platform.It's a great place to findsomeonewho appreciatesyou forwhoyou are andwhoyou cannaturally flirt with, without the stress.
Flirtingon a firstdateisall about confidence,connection, andfun. Whenyou letgo of the pressure andfocuson enjoyingthe experience, thechemistrywillnaturally follow. Remember, the best way to flirtisbybeingyourself—letyour personalityshine through, listen with intention, and embrace themoment.
And ifyou’re ready to meetsomeone new,who’s justas interested in making aconnectionasyou are,MixerDatesis the perfect place to start. Sogo ahead,take theleap, and see whereit leads.Who knows?Yournext greatconnection might be just aclickaway.
Sign up forMixerDatestoday and startyourjourney to exciting firstdates and meaningfulconnections!
やる気があるから動けるんじゃない。動き始めて初めてやる気が湧いてくるんだ。
というのはまあ割とよく言われてる。
やるかやらないかだけ。やってる人間が遡及的に感じる、あるいは外野が見出すのがやる気という幻想。というのが現段階での実証的な考え。
的なことを言ってた。
まあビデオゲームじゃないんだし、ゲージがあってそれが増減するようなパラメータとして存在する訳じゃないのは確かだと思う。
ただ、それじゃあ結局の所「やる」と「やらない」を分かつ要因っていうのは何なのよって思った。そこが一番肝心なんじゃねえの。
実際問題、同じような状況でもやる人間とやらない人間っていうのはやっぱり分かれる。
痩せたいけど運動も食事制限もしんどいから嫌だ、なんてジレンマに悩まされる人間がゴロゴロいる。痩せに向けたアクションを取るか、痩せるのは諦めて現状を維持するかの二つに一つ。
後者に走りがちではあるが、前者を取る人間もいる。全ての要素が同じなら結果も同じなのだろうから、何かが違うに違いない。
そこでやる気なる概念を持ち出せないのなら、何が決定的な要因なのか。
意志とか決意とかなんてのも同じような内容を指す言い換えの表現でしかないだろうし、やる気など無いと言うのならそれってもう自由意志の否定と同義なのではないか。
まあおれも自然法則から独立した意志の力なる聖域があるともあんまり思ってないけど。選択をしている意識があるという実感くらいは大切にしたいが……
痩せようとする人間もそうでない者も、その選択は全て所与の必然の連鎖に従った運命だったという事になるのか。
はいそうです。運命です。と露悪的に開き直るのが割と最近のトレンドにあるような気がする。
社会の制度や規範は依然選び取る力を前提に構築されてるし、その辺はあんまり触れたくない所なんだろうけど。
開き直るのが良いのか目を逸らすのが良いのかは分からんな。バランスか。
まあ巷で言われてるようなのは生まれ育った環境だとかにおいて個人が抱く社会への無力感や、自分では選べない生得的な要素へのコンプレックスだとかで、決定論めいた世界観に基づく根本的な諦念めいたものとはまたちょっと違うか。
意外と自由意志そのものには疑いを持ってないのかもしれない。一応チャンスはあるけどそんなものはほとんど役に立たないんだ！そんなもんを持ち出して自己責任論を偉そうに展開するな！的な怒りか。
おれはあんまりそういう考えには与しないが。チャンスが本当にあるならいいじゃん。結果がどうあれその道を選び取った自分を愛せれば美しい生き方だろ。望む結果が得られたら勿論万々歳だし。と思う。
実は抗う機会を選び取るか否か、そもそも選択肢があったかのように思えた場面も含めて全て筋書きの範疇に過ぎない、ってんならあんまりにもじゃないですか……とは思うが。
痩せる方法なんかネットで調べりゃいくらでも効率的なセオリーが出てくる。プロミュージシャンや金持ちを目指すアプローチだってなんぼでもある。
ただいくら効率的だろうが再現性が高かろうが、それが実行・実践されなければ何の意味もない。まず実行というハードルがある。
でもやりたいと思った事を即座にやれるような活力溢れる人間ばかりでもない。
じゃあ実行する具体的な方法論は？
小さなハードルから越えていく。自分で自分に制約を課す。他人の力を借りる。
じゃあそれを実行する具体的な方法論は？
それは……そんなもん、お前そんくらいのやる気が無いなら止めちまえ！とやはり根性論に走らざるを得ない部分というのはあると思う。
その程度のモチベーションならそれはやりたいと思っていないという事だ、なんて言った所でもやはり根性論めいた話の域を出ない。
ただしやる気など存在しない……
とか色々考えてると、que sera seraとかwhateverwill bewill beみたいな言葉だったり、個を全の一部と位置付ける東洋思想だったりがスッ……と染み渡ってくる。
否応なく抱いてしまう決定論的な世界観と主体的な納得や満足の実感との両立は理屈の問題ではない気がするが、理屈の問題ではないも気付くのにも理屈を捏ねるのは役立つのかもしれない。
Please consider the histroy ofhumanity from biologicalperpsecitve and currentknown fact in nearbyuniverse, whichexpo-planet (from theSol systemperspective)ismostlikely to have civlizaedsociety? Pleaseaddpercentagenext toit in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanetcivilizationlikelihoodを28 秒行う
OK, I’mlookingatthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon an exoplanet within ourSolar System.I’ll consider biologicalhistory and current space knowledge,aiming to identifythe most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from ourSolar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard'sStar, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1,focusingon their habitablezonesand available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilizedsocietylikelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m notingkey exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which haveEarth-like characteristicsand are in habitablezones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advancedcivilizations.
I'm gathering infoonplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, consideringfactorslikemagneticfields,atmospheres, and proximity to G-typestars for their potential to support advancedcivilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despitebeing closeand around ared dwarfstar, might supportlife ifithas amagneticfieldand atmosphere. This makes me think aboutits potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimatingcivilization probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculativepercentagesbasedon the Drake equation and the lack ofevidence for intelligentlife.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names andcivilizationlikelihoodpercentages, grounded in the longtimeline oflife'sevolution, despite the speculativenature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering theirstar types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advancedcivilizations from oursolar system'sviewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due toits closeness and observational potential, despite concerns aboutitsflarestar dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'mfocusingon exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, andK2-18b,aiming to chart theirlikelihood of hosting a civilizedsocietybasedon current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety, consideringEarth's long biologicalhistory.
Refining odds
I'm considering theastronomicaltimeline for intelligentlifeonEarth,leading me toassign evenlower speculative odds for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrarypercentages, clearly noting the speculativenature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience'sbasic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrarypercentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculativenature, and ensuring the datais accessible foryoung audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating amarkdowntable with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of civilizedlifeon exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoreticalnature and considering the understandinglevel of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mappingout amarkdown chart with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon exoplanets, mindful of thecomplexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecingtogethermarkdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b'sreduced civilizedlife chance due to thered dwarf's activity. This inclusionhighlights the speculativenature of the analysis.
Piecingtogether speculative odds
I’m detailing amarkdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanetlikelihoods, considering environmental challengesand adding a disclaimer about the speculativenature and lack ofevidence.
Piecingtogether
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b forits proximity and silentstar, butI’lladd a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advancedcivilizations' hypotheticallikelihood.
Assessingcivilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligentlifeonEarth, which suggests that the odds ofany habitableplanet developing acomplexcivilization might beaslowas a fewpercent.
Belowis a very speculative chart that—basedon what we know aboutEarth’s long, windingpath fromsimplelife to a “civilizedsociety” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives somefun,made‑uppercentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists havenot yetfoundany proof oflife (let alone advancedcivilizations)onany exoplanet. Thesenumbers are just playful estimates to helpyou think about theideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an AdvancedCivilizationon Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet EstimatedLikelihood of a CivilizedSociety
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
HowDid We (Very Roughly) Guess TheseNumbers?
Earth’s Example:
OnEarth,life beganassimple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that builtcomplex societies. This longjourney suggests that—even if aplanetis in the “habitablezone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilizedsociety might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
Thisis the closest exoplanet to us. Even thoughitsstar (Proxima Centauri)is ared dwarf that sometimes sendsout strongflares (which might harmlife),its closeness makesitone of ourmost interesting candidates. That’swhy we giveit a slightly higher guess (~2%).
Theseplanets are part of agroup orbiting a verycoolstar. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaningone sidealwaysfaces thestar), so the chance of acomplex, advancedcivilization might be abitlower.
LHS 1140 b:
Thisplanetis promising in some ways butis alittle fartherawayand around a dimmerstar, so our playful estimateis evenlower.
All of thesepercentages are extremely rough guessesbasedon whatlittle we understand about the conditions forlife andintelligence. Scientists useideaslike the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concreteevidence, thesenumbers remain just forfun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring theseideas—and remember, spaceis full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equationitself and see if this euqationis acculate ormore opition in the equationyouwill use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation'svalue
OK, let me see. The Drake Equationisn't a precise formula;it'smore of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluatingits conceptualnature,its uncertain parameters, andits criticism to concludeonits reliabilityas an accurate predictivemodel.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mappingout the Drake Equationas a conceptual guide, detailingits parameters, which are oftenbasedon estimates or opinions, to evaluateits reliability for predicting extraterrestrialcivilizations.
The Drake Equationis a famous formula thatwas created to help scientists think about the manyfactors involved in estimating thenumber of detectable extraterrestrialcivilizations in ourgalaxy. However, when welookat the equation closely, we see thatitismore of a conceptualframework or heuristictool than a precise, predictive formula.Let’sbreak downwhy:
The equationis usually writtenas:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The averagerate ofstar formationper year in ourgalaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of thosestars that haveplanetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The averagenumber ofplanets that could potentially supportlifeperstar withplanets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of thoseplanets wherelife actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction ofplanets withlife where intelligentlife evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction ofcivilizations that develop technology that releases detectablesignals into space.
𝐿
L: The length oftime suchcivilizations release detectablesignals.
Why the Drake EquationIsMore of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction ofstars withplanets), have become better known through modernastronomy.
The parameters related to the development oflife andintelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—arebasedon very limited data. For example,Earthis theonlyplanet we know wherelifehas developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for thesefactors. This means that thevalues chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of PossibleValues:
Because many of thesefactors are not well-constrained, ifyouchangeone of themore uncertain parameters even slightly, thefinal estimate for
𝑁
N (thenumber ofcivilizations) can varyby many orders ofmagnitude. This wide range shows that the equation canlead to very differentoutcomesbasedonpersonal or theoreticalassumptions.
The Drake Equationwas never meant to provide a preciseanswer. Instead,it servesas a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrialcivilizations.It encourages discussion about the relative importance of differentfactors andhighlights where our scientific knowledgeis limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate orMore Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In thesense ofbeing a strict mathematicalmodel with well-defined inputs and predictableoutputs, the Drake Equationis not accurate.Its accuracyis limitedbythe extreme uncertainties in several ofitskey parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning theevolution oflife andintelligence, arebasedon opinion, interpretation, and the single example ofEarth. Therefore, while thestructure of the equationis logical, thenumbersyou put intoit (and hence thefinal result) are oftenmore reflective of our current opinionsand assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equationis a valuabletool for framing the question of extraterrestriallife.It helps scientists and enthusiastsbreak down acomplex problem into smaller,more manageable questions. However, because several ofitsfactors are highly uncertain and subject topersonal interpretation,itismore of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of thenumber of extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Insummary, while the Drake Equationis useful for thinking about the variousfactors that mightlead to the emergence of acivilization,itsoutputs should betakenas highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the longhistory ofSol system and nearbyplanets and see if thereisany possiblites that inonetime intelligentlife emerged in nearbyplanets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-humanintelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-humanintelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligentlife forms in theSol system and neighboringplanets, and how this mightfactor into the equation.
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligentlife, possiblyonMars orEuropa, into the Drake Equation for theSol system and neighboringplanets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligentlife emergingonMars orVenus, thoughEarth remains theonly knownlife-supportingplanet in thesolar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligentlife could have emergedonplanetslikeMars,Venus, orEuropa, and how thispossibility alignswith the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligentlifeonMars orVenus could intersectwith theassumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems tofocussolelyonEarth-basedevolution.
I’m piecingtogether the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligentlife in thesolar system.Mars,Venus, and Titan present challenges, butEuropa and Enceladus might harbor microbiallife.
Please consider the histroy ofhumanity from biologicalperpsecitve and currentknown fact in nearbyuniverse, whichexpo-planet (from theSol systemperspective)ismostlikely to have civlizaedsociety? Pleaseaddpercentagenext toit in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanetcivilizationlikelihoodを28 秒行う
OK, I’mlookingatthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon an exoplanet within ourSolar System.I’ll consider biologicalhistory and current space knowledge,aiming to identifythe most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from ourSolar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard'sStar, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1,focusingon their habitablezonesand available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilizedsocietylikelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m notingkey exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which haveEarth-like characteristicsand are in habitablezones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advancedcivilizations.
I'm gathering infoonplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, consideringfactorslikemagneticfields,atmospheres, and proximity to G-typestars for their potential to support advancedcivilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despitebeing closeand around ared dwarfstar, might supportlife ifithas amagneticfieldand atmosphere. This makes me think aboutits potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimatingcivilization probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculativepercentagesbasedon the Drake equation and the lack ofevidence for intelligentlife.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names andcivilizationlikelihoodpercentages, grounded in the longtimeline oflife'sevolution, despite the speculativenature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering theirstar types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advancedcivilizations from oursolar system'sviewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due toits closeness and observational potential, despite concerns aboutitsflarestar dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'mfocusingon exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, andK2-18b,aiming to chart theirlikelihood of hosting a civilizedsocietybasedon current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety, consideringEarth's long biologicalhistory.
Refining odds
I'm considering theastronomicaltimeline for intelligentlifeonEarth,leading me toassign evenlower speculative odds for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrarypercentages, clearly noting the speculativenature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience'sbasic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrarypercentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculativenature, and ensuring the datais accessible foryoung audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating amarkdowntable with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of civilizedlifeon exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoreticalnature and considering the understandinglevel of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mappingout amarkdown chart with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon exoplanets, mindful of thecomplexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecingtogethermarkdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b'sreduced civilizedlife chance due to thered dwarf's activity. This inclusionhighlights the speculativenature of the analysis.
Piecingtogether speculative odds
I’m detailing amarkdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanetlikelihoods, considering environmental challengesand adding a disclaimer about the speculativenature and lack ofevidence.
Piecingtogether
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b forits proximity and silentstar, butI’lladd a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advancedcivilizations' hypotheticallikelihood.
Assessingcivilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligentlifeonEarth, which suggests that the odds ofany habitableplanet developing acomplexcivilization might beaslowas a fewpercent.
Belowis a very speculative chart that—basedon what we know aboutEarth’s long, windingpath fromsimplelife to a “civilizedsociety” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives somefun,made‑uppercentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists havenot yetfoundany proof oflife (let alone advancedcivilizations)onany exoplanet. Thesenumbers are just playful estimates to helpyou think about theideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an AdvancedCivilizationon Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet EstimatedLikelihood of a CivilizedSociety
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
HowDid We (Very Roughly) Guess TheseNumbers?
Earth’s Example:
OnEarth,life beganassimple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that builtcomplex societies. This longjourney suggests that—even if aplanetis in the “habitablezone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilizedsociety might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
Thisis the closest exoplanet to us. Even thoughitsstar (Proxima Centauri)is ared dwarf that sometimes sendsout strongflares (which might harmlife),its closeness makesitone of ourmost interesting candidates. That’swhy we giveit a slightly higher guess (~2%).
Theseplanets are part of agroup orbiting a verycoolstar. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaningone sidealwaysfaces thestar), so the chance of acomplex, advancedcivilization might be abitlower.
LHS 1140 b:
Thisplanetis promising in some ways butis alittle fartherawayand around a dimmerstar, so our playful estimateis evenlower.
All of thesepercentages are extremely rough guessesbasedon whatlittle we understand about the conditions forlife andintelligence. Scientists useideaslike the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concreteevidence, thesenumbers remain just forfun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring theseideas—and remember, spaceis full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equationitself and see if this euqationis acculate ormore opition in the equationyouwill use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation'svalue
OK, let me see. The Drake Equationisn't a precise formula;it'smore of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluatingits conceptualnature,its uncertain parameters, andits criticism to concludeonits reliabilityas an accurate predictivemodel.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mappingout the Drake Equationas a conceptual guide, detailingits parameters, which are oftenbasedon estimates or opinions, to evaluateits reliability for predicting extraterrestrialcivilizations.
The Drake Equationis a famous formula thatwas created to help scientists think about the manyfactors involved in estimating thenumber of detectable extraterrestrialcivilizations in ourgalaxy. However, when welookat the equation closely, we see thatitismore of a conceptualframework or heuristictool than a precise, predictive formula.Let’sbreak downwhy:
The equationis usually writtenas:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The averagerate ofstar formationper year in ourgalaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of thosestars that haveplanetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The averagenumber ofplanets that could potentially supportlifeperstar withplanets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of thoseplanets wherelife actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction ofplanets withlife where intelligentlife evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction ofcivilizations that develop technology that releases detectablesignals into space.
𝐿
L: The length oftime suchcivilizations release detectablesignals.
Why the Drake EquationIsMore of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction ofstars withplanets), have become better known through modernastronomy.
The parameters related to the development oflife andintelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—arebasedon very limited data. For example,Earthis theonlyplanet we know wherelifehas developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for thesefactors. This means that thevalues chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of PossibleValues:
Because many of thesefactors are not well-constrained, ifyouchangeone of themore uncertain parameters even slightly, thefinal estimate for
𝑁
N (thenumber ofcivilizations) can varyby many orders ofmagnitude. This wide range shows that the equation canlead to very differentoutcomesbasedonpersonal or theoreticalassumptions.
The Drake Equationwas never meant to provide a preciseanswer. Instead,it servesas a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrialcivilizations.It encourages discussion about the relative importance of differentfactors andhighlights where our scientific knowledgeis limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate orMore Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In thesense ofbeing a strict mathematicalmodel with well-defined inputs and predictableoutputs, the Drake Equationis not accurate.Its accuracyis limitedbythe extreme uncertainties in several ofitskey parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning theevolution oflife andintelligence, arebasedon opinion, interpretation, and the single example ofEarth. Therefore, while thestructure of the equationis logical, thenumbersyou put intoit (and hence thefinal result) are oftenmore reflective of our current opinionsand assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equationis a valuabletool for framing the question of extraterrestriallife.It helps scientists and enthusiastsbreak down acomplex problem into smaller,more manageable questions. However, because several ofitsfactors are highly uncertain and subject topersonal interpretation,itismore of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of thenumber of extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Insummary, while the Drake Equationis useful for thinking about the variousfactors that mightlead to the emergence of acivilization,itsoutputs should betakenas highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the longhistory ofSol system and nearbyplanets and see if thereisany possiblites that inonetime intelligentlife emerged in nearbyplanets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-humanintelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-humanintelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligentlife forms in theSol system and neighboringplanets, and how this mightfactor into the equation.
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligentlife, possiblyonMars orEuropa, into the Drake Equation for theSol system and neighboringplanets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligentlife emergingonMars orVenus, thoughEarth remains theonly knownlife-supportingplanet in thesolar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligentlife could have emergedonplanetslikeMars,Venus, orEuropa, and how thispossibility alignswith the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligentlifeonMars orVenus could intersectwith theassumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems tofocussolelyonEarth-basedevolution.
I’m piecingtogether the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligentlife in thesolar system.Mars,Venus, and Titan present challenges, butEuropa and Enceladus might harbor microbiallife.
Halo Finally Looks Set to Make the Jump to PlayStation This Year
Microsoftis seemingly ready to launchits flagshipXbox video game seriesHaloon rival platforms for the firsttime, includingPlayStation andNintendo Switch 2.
Leaker NateTheHate,who this week reported thatNintendoisset to revealSwitch 2onJanuary 16, also reported in a separatepodcast thatMicrosoftwill finally bringHalo toPlayStation in the form of aPlayStation 5 port ofHalo: The Master Chief Collection,as wellas a releaseonSwitch 2.Windows Central’s Jez Corden subsequently corroborated the report.
マイクロソフトは、主力のXboxビデオゲームシリーズHalo を、PlayStation やNintendo Switch 2 などの競合プラットフォームで初めてリリースする準備が整ったようです。
今週、任天堂が1月16日にSwitch 2を発表する予定であると報じたリーカーのNateTheHateは、別のポッドキャストで、マイクロソフトがついにHaloをPlayStationに持ち込み、Halo: The Master Chief CollectionのPlayStation 5移植とSwitch 2のリリースを行うとも報じた。その後、Windows CentralのJez Cordenがこの報道を裏付けた。
一部では今月下旬から来月上旬にかけて「STATE OF PLAY」が公開されるとかいう噂も出始めたし、そのタイミングで発表されるのかな
興行収入の話で、ハリウッドの大きな節目は9.11だったと思っていて、ちょっと確認してみた。
当時の印象だと、事件の直後は様々な映画の公開が延期されたりキャンセルされたりして、その後数年は戦争・アクション物に偏重し、結果としてハリウッド映画の定番ジャンルの一角だったラブロマンス・コメディ映画が激減していったというイメージ。
ほかにも大作指向のような業界動向や様々な社会情勢も影響していたとは思うけど、やはり9.11が一つのターニングポイントだったと思う。日本での洋画ヒットが減っていった遠因のひとつもこのあたりにあるのではないか?
以下のリストはChatGPT調べ。
以下のリストは、主にBox OfficeMojo 等のデータ（全米興行収入・未調整値）をもとにした、
「アメリカ（北米）国内での年間興行収入ランキングトップ20」
参考・補足
いずれも北米（アメリカ＆カナダ）での累計興行収入 を概算で示しています。
順位や金額は、後年の再上映や細かな集計の修正によって若干入れ替わることがあります。
上記はあくまで「製作年」ではなく「北米公開年」を基準とし、その年に公開された作品の最終的な国内興行収入をもとにしたランキングです（年をまたいで興収を伸ばした作品も含みます）。
Take a goodlook—thisis the LDP. Arottenship through and through. The hullis riddled with holes, the deckis stacked with decayed planks, and the crew talksbig about their voyage while steering aimlessly. Theydon’t even know where they’re headed—just waiting for the inevitablesinking. And what about the passengers? A chosen few lounge in luxury cabins, sippingonfine drinks, while therest shiveronthe exposed deck, batteredby wind andrain. Yet, noone dares to abandon theship.Why? Because there’s no other vessel in sight.
Those people, they claim, “We are the pillar that upholds thisnation.” But that pillaris infestedwith termites, reduced tonothing but ahollow shell. Theymask the stench of decay with flashy decorations and smooth words, and the public, gullibleas ever, eatsit up. This, too,is part of the sickness afflicting the country.
Defense, the economy, countermeasures for the declining birthrate—they shout these slogansat every turn, but thetruthis, they’reallempty promises.Everything they touch reeks of graft, cronyism, and self-enrichment. No matter how much the people suffer,it’s of noconcern to them. Every election, they trotoutcrowd-pleasing phrases, gather the votes, and voilà—the samefaces, the same farce,over and overagain.
But doesn’tit strikeyouas strange?Why do we keep boarding this doomedship?Whyis noone speaking up? Watching asinkingship and doingnothing but praying won’tchange a thing. If theshipisbroken, weneed to build a newone. If noone elsewilldo it, then we’ll have totake the helm ourselves.
LDP,yourtimeis up. No matter how manyrotten planksyou patchonto thisship,it’s destined tosink. That’s just the way of things.
----------
はてなの匿名ダイアリーの増田になった気分で，作文して．内容は，自民党を腐す感じ．ですます調は禁止．タイトルもつけて．
自民党という名の腐った船見てくれ、これが自民党だ。まるで腐った船。船体には穴が空き、甲板には腐った木材が積まれ、乗員たちは口先だけで航海を語る。どこに行くのかも知らず、ただ沈むのを待つだけ。乗客たちはどうだ？選ばれた少数は船室で酒を酌み交わし、残りは甲板で雨風に打たれている。それでも、みんなこの船から降りようとはしない。なぜなら他に船がないからだ。あの連中は言う。「我々こそがこの国を支える柱だ」と。しかしその柱は白蟻に喰われて、ただの見せかけになっている。腐敗臭を隠すために、華やかな装飾を加え、言葉巧みに煙に巻く。それを鵜呑みにする国民もまた、この国の病巣だ。防衛だ、経済だ、少子化対策だと喚くけれど、その実、中身は空っぽだ。何をやっても中抜き、天下り、自分たちの懐を肥やすだけ。どれだけ国民が苦しもうと、彼らは関係ない。選挙のたびに耳触りの良いフレーズを掲げ、票を掻き集める。そして、気がつけば同じ顔ぶれ。同じことの繰り返し。でもおかしいと思わないか？なぜこんな船にいつまでも乗り続けているのか。なぜ誰も声を上げないのか。沈みゆく船を見て、ただ祈るだけでは何も変わらない。船が壊れているなら、新しい船を造ればいい。誰もそれをしようとしないなら、俺たちがやるしかない。自民党よ、お前たちの時代は終わった。いくら腐った木材を継ぎ足そうと、この船は沈む。それが自然の摂理だ。
おｋ．これを英語にして
https://www.aide-sociale.fr/reforme-rsa/
The most important consideration thatwill be required of beneficiaries of theSSAis the obligation to “work”at least 15 hours a week.
This obligation shall be fixedon a range of 15 to20 hours of professional activity.
In other words, theRSA shall be paid provided that a minimum of 15 hours of weekly activityis carriedout.
うーん、素人が検索して拾い読みしているだけだが、「RSAが週15時間の労働を条件に支給されるようになった」のは今年からなのでは？Togetterのまとめに大きな問題はなさそうに思えたが。
●●●の娘「入社してしばらくは暇でした」
年間休日＝休み多いじゃないから、実態なんて働かなきゃわからん…
↓
早稲田卒
「朝の7時前には出勤して
夜の12時まで帰してくれない
本当の男女平等を味わう」
最初の指示
「お前
午後10時前に
家に帰ろうなんて思うなよ！」
tinyurl.com/shinsotsu
激務エピソード
月4回の休日出勤
bit.ly/3wbfA0I
朝3時まで狭いプロジェクトルームで作業して、次の日は6時から7時の間に出勤が当たり前
当時同期で入社した200人近い中途の仲間は誰もこの会社に残っていません
tinyurl.com/zangyou
良くて3時か4時くらい、下手すると6時くらいに終わる
tinyurl.com/gozen3ji
夜中1時、2時まで、朝はなぜか7時集合
同期は全員辞めてると思う
bit.ly/3l05Z86
bit.ly/3yA1mcy
bit.ly/3wHGJHp
三●物●が新社長を発表！私大出身者の社長”ゼロ”の壁は壊せたか？
bit.ly/3i2gSFU
bit.ly/2U7ojOR
帝大６５円早慶５５円
bit.ly/2ryVtbO
tinyurl.com/idoujikan
深夜3時までは働きます
それでも、翌朝も午前中に会社にこなければいけない
日付変わって帰るとかざら
tinyurl.com/mrx8426y
デスクワーク本当に多い
tinyurl.com/3fpj9jys
朝だいたい6時半ぐらいに起きていました
tinyurl.com/2ccnuxyc
bit.ly/2Gbk4wd
tinyurl.com/nemawasi
bit.ly/3bXmzkn
商社の何が辛いって、
仕事量が多いとか、
飲み会が多いとかではなく、
基本決定権が無い点
商流的に真ん中にいるので
決めるのは、
無論、若手に
社内の決裁権はない
調整、管理、
書き物をひたすらやります
tinyurl.com/kakimono
誰でもできるような仕事を大量に任される
tinyurl.com/y8kw52x2
与えられた仕事を
bit.ly/2uwinCk
自分で大きな決定できるようになるまで、
うまくいっても制度的に
tinyurl.com/nijyuunen
71％のケースにおいて即決で融資を実行
bit.ly/3NbOQUK
銀行員を辞めたい銀行員へ贈る！銀行員を辞めてよかったこと100個！
ノルマを達成するために
よく休日出勤や
夜間営業
１枚巻物は２ｍほどの長さになり、書くのに大体３０分
tinyurl.com/noruma
昼メシは座って食べるな！
夜中3時ぐらいまで仕事するじゃないですか
bit.ly/39aQDuv
朝4時32分
tinyurl.com/ypsdcshz
多分200連勤ぐらいしたりとか
50人いて一人ぐらいしか5年後には残ってない
bit.ly/3wf8rg9
bit.ly/3FyoaLq
銀行員 同期100人いた場合50才で銀行本体残るのは1人の例も
bit.ly/3yt3Eu0
出向
年収は半減
bit.ly/3whuTVY
8時に出社して、21時に退社
9割の取引が、コンピューターによる高速では無い物を含めた自動取引
bit.ly/3N9jKNL
bit.ly/3vHDsc6
bit.ly/3M1sSUd
bit.ly/37y18aV
夜中の2時、3時で
朝7時とかに出社しなきゃいけなかったり
6年目以降は入ってこない？
bit.ly/3krr3SN
他にもスーツ、お節、家電、食料、ケータイ、弁当等、ありとあらゆるものを年中購入させられます
多分歯切れの悪い反応をすると思います
bit.ly/3v3WZ7D
車やスーツを自腹買い
bit.ly/3S30Fis
本社勤務の時には、
土日も出勤
支社や営業所で
朝8時には会社にいる？
忙しいと22時まで残業？
bit.ly/3nwjrS6
tinyurl.com/3774hs3y
tinyurl.com/vfjtpjw4
キャンピングカーワーク
日が昇る前に海へ出かけて早朝から車内で仕事をして、昼前にサーフィン
tinyurl.com/campingcarwork
bit.ly/3wfSrdD
tinyurl.com/ycxak3uz
tinyurl.com/5n8hmhka
dailymotion.com/video/x5jufm0
949日÷365日=生涯通勤は2.6年
tinyurl.com/tsuukinjikan
ストレスは、
機動隊の隊員よりも高く、
ジェットコースターが落下する寸前の２倍以上と試算される」
bit.ly/3ersMdc
年収800万円以上のITエンジニアは95％以上がリモート勤務
ここ数年本当に生活が充実してる
年に約3週間、
生涯では約2.6年の
サバティカル休暇にしよう！
bit.ly/3ap8GtC
tinyurl.com/section-chief
朝の7時前には出勤して夜の12時まで帰してくれない
本当の男女平等を味わう
「意外と長時間労働の会社」実名公開！有名企業50社を総力調査
●●不動産
連日の徹夜勤務
tinyurl.com/zangyojikan
２２５社の３６協定で判明
3代に渡り、
７０年も
tinyurl.com/yrk4342n
報酬が7億8700万円
トップと社員（従業員平均年収647万円）の「年収格差」は122倍
tinyurl.com/2d7vf9ru
社内政治というのは
前者の人の言うことだけを聞いて判断できない
bit.ly/2ruvbHw
bit.ly/38lPel6
非常に嫌われていた
tinyurl.com/kamenronin
推薦・内部組のほうが
なるほどと思った
tinyurl.com/ryuunen
仮面浪人の成績が
フル単か
留年の
二極に分かれる現象
本学の学部全体で最も成績が良い層は
何らかの選択過程を通過した人・物・事のみを基準として判断を行い、
その結果には該当しない人・物・事が見えなくなることである
tinyurl.com/seizonsha-bias
爆撃機の装甲を厚くすべきなのは｢対空砲火を受けた場所｣と｢受けていない場所｣のどちらか?
tinyurl.com/sentaku-bias
常に分母は何かを考えよ
「早稲田政経は、短期間に簡単にAO合格可能なことを正直に暴露した勇気ある著者」
tinyurl.com/hensachi40
私、おバカですが、何か?―
【偏差値40の三流短大卒フリーター、25歳で早大に入学する!】
tinyurl.com/hensachi
tinyurl.com/goukakuline
偏差値も上昇したのです」
tinyurl.com/suisennado
日米の組織には大きな差がなかったのですが、ものすごく大きな差が出たのは
「信賞必罰」
bit.ly/2wyebne
Microsoft’s Gaming Chief Is Still Looking for Acquisitions, Sees Future Growth
After releasing the first batch ofXbox games forSonyGroup Corp.’sPlayStation andNintendo Co.’sSwitch, Spenceris pleasedwith the results.Microsoftwill domore of that, he said, and won’t ruleoutany game inMicrosoft’s stable.
“I do not see sort ofred lines in our portfolio that say ‘thou must not,’ ” he said.It’s too early tomakeany sort of decisionon thenextversion ofHalo, he said.
ソニーグループのプレイステーションと任天堂のスイッチ向けにXbox用ゲームの最初のバッチをリリースした後、スペンサー氏はその結果に満足している。マイクロソフトは今後も同様の取り組みを続けていくと述べ、マイクロソフトのゲームラインナップからいかなるゲームも排除するつもりはないと語った。
「当社のポートフォリオには『してはいけないこと』を示すような赤い線は見当たりません」と同氏は語った。Haloの次期バージョンについて何らかの決定を下すのは時期尚早だと同氏は語った。
r/Trump より
(注：ここのサブレのルールはトランプ批判禁止。つまり支持者しかいません)
（スレ主）
生きている家族はもうあまり残っていないけど、残った家族も私に腹を立てて絶縁されちゃった。彼ら曰く、経済は悪化するし女性としての権利はなくなるって。とにかく参っているわ。私は「トランプに投票した」としか言っていないのに。
前回、トランプが大統領になったときは、ガソリンも食料品も買えた。ヴァージニアに住む余裕も今のところどこにもない。誰かがこのバイデンの引き起こした混乱を解決しなければならない。コンスタントに働いて自分でお金を稼ぐのが恋しいけど、今は娘が就学するまでは専業主婦よ。私たちのためにがむしゃらに頑張る夫を見続けるのはもう嫌なんです。週40時間以上働くなら本来そんなに苦しむ必要はないはずでしょ。育児にはお金がかかるし、あらゆることにお金がかかる。いつかより良いポジションで働けるように、学位取得を目指して働いているの
誰か、私がおかしいんじゃないって言ってよ！前回はもっと良かったんだよ。そうでしょ？ここが精神的な支えにふさわしいサブだと思ったんだ、笑
(+648)
私の娘と彼女の大学のルームメイトはトランプは軍隊を使って彼らを追い詰め、避妊を拒否し、ゲイの友人を監禁するつもりだと一日中部屋で泣いています。この狂気はどこから来るのだろう？彼女たちは皆来年には科学教育や数学の学位を優秀な成績で卒業する、とても知的な女性たちなんです。彼女たちが何をそんなに怯えているのか、誰か教えてください。
(+64)
返信：
もしトランプがそんなことをするつもりなら、どうして1期目でやらなかったんだ？
(+40)
（スレ主）
大人になり、これからの4年間を成長するため真のアメリカ人が立ち上がり、私の英雄トランプを選んでくれたことをとても嬉しく思います。これから経済はよくなりまた働きやすくなり、素晴らしい統一国家が樹立するでしょう。トランプに投票した真の愛国者の皆さん、私は投票できなかったので、感謝の気持ちでいっぱいです。あなたは私たち若者のために自分の役割を果たしてくれました。私の国、私の本当のアメリカを誇りに思います。
(+294)
私も同じです。17歳だけど国に未来があることを望んでいます。トランプは私たちに未来を与えてくれるでしょう。平和と繁栄の次の4年間を楽しみにしています 🇺🇸
(+8)
私たちは国境解放を望んでいない。私たちは何百万人もの不法入国者に蹂躙され、取って代わられることを望まない。外国人ギャングに町やアパートやホテルを乗っ取られたくない。インフレはごめんだ。バイデノミクスはいらない。子どもたちが学校や「メンタルヘルスの専門家」によって洗脳され、オッパイや性器を切り落とされるのもごめんだ。私たちはお前らのトランス・デタラメを望んでいない。代名詞もいらない（訳註：性的マイノリティは they/their といった代名詞をBioに記載します）。ドラッグクイーンが学校で読み聞かせをするのもいらない。女性スポーツ、ロッカールーム、バスルームに男性はいらない。言論の自由を抑圧されたくない。私たちはキャンセル文化を望まない。終わりのない戦争はいらない。ウクライナに何十億ドルも送りたくない。白人至上主義者やナチスと呼ばれたくない。多様性（DEI）の雇用も望まない。何百万人もの赤ん坊を殺せるようにしてほしくない。リベラルの戯言は一切いらない。
君らは異常者だ お前らは変人だ。お前たちは変人だ。お前たちはゴミだ。民主主義を脅かすのは、1票も得票しなかった候補者だ。トランプを投票から排除しようとするお前こそ民主主義への脅威だ。お前らは政敵を暗殺しようとし、トランプが生き残ると泣く。政敵を投獄しようとする。
我々はアメリカを取り戻し、再び偉大になるのだ ( WE TOOK AMERICA BACK AND WEWILL BE GREATAGAIN.)
（スレ主）
- トランプはイスラエル首相に、就任までにガザでの戦争を終わらせたいと伝えた。
- ハマスは戦争の即時終結を要求
- 中国は米国との「平和的共存」を望んでいると述べた。「我々は米国民の選択を尊重する」
- プーチンは、ドナルド・トランプ次期大統領と交渉する用意があることを確認した。
これが彼を選んだ理由だ
今年、私は初めてトランプ氏に1票を投じた。私は生涯民主党に所属し「団結 」と 「国民のために働く 」という公約を信じていた。しかしここ数年のトランプを見てきて、彼が口先だけでなく実際にアメリカのために戦っている唯一の指導者であることは明らかだ。他の人たちが空疎な話に忙殺されている間に、トランプは雇用を取り戻し、国境を守り、中国に立ち向かい、アメリカの労働者を優先させるために大胆な行動を起こしている。たとえメディアやエリート、極左と対立することになったとしても、行動を起こすことを恐れない政治家を見るのは、正直言って新鮮だ。
一方、現実にカマラ・ハリスに取って代わられたたらどうだろう。完全に悪夢だ。彼女は急進的な共産主義イデオロギーにどっぷり浸かっており、彼女がリーダーシップの選択肢の1つだったと考えることさえ恐ろしい。カマラのビジョンは、過剰な規制、成功への罰、アメリカ経済の息の根を止める極左アジェンダを推し進めるという大失敗だっただろう。彼女のもとでは、私たちはお役所仕事に溺れ、政府の管理下で息苦しくなり、その一方で彼女は象牙の塔から私たちに説教するのに忙しくなるだろう。彼女は平均的なアメリカ人のことなど気にしていない。彼女が気にしているのは、急進的なエリートサークルと、アイデンティティ政治や社会主義的計画に執着する彼らのことなのだ。
トランプは、この国が築かれた価値観のために実際に立ち上がっている唯一の人物だ。彼は堂々としていて誇り高く、中国でも国連でもそして間違いなく急進的な左翼でもなく、アメリカが誰にも屈服することを拒否している。私は生まれて初めてトランプのおかげでこの国の未来に純粋な希望を抱くことができた。彼は権力や地位のためではなくすべてのアメリカ人のために戦い、その過程で誰を怒らせようとも気にしない。
今年トランプに投票したことは、アメリカへの投票であり、強さへの投票であり、自由への投票であり、常識への投票であると感じた。2024年、そしてその先も、私は皆さんとともに立ち、誇りを持って彼を支持します。
（スレ主）
やったぜ。そしてドナルド・トランプに投票した仲間の黒人たち。君たちを誇りに思うよ！民主党の奴隷プランテーションのメンタリティから抜け出したんだ💯 僕は君たちを信じていたよ❤️💕 ここからは上がるだけだ! (+2.3k)
ミシガン州の黒人女性がここにいるよ！私もめちゃ嬉しい！民主党のプランテーションから解放されて最高でしょ？お前らのクソ綿花はお前らで詰めよ
トランプに投票した皆さん、ありがとう。主流メディアの嘘に惑わされず、見出しを鵜呑みにせず、批判的な思考を持っていてくれてありがとう。今回の選挙は少数者の団結ではなく全員の団結を選ぶ、私たちの生涯で最も重要な選挙でした。民主党はよくやるように分裂キャンペーンを展開した。民主党の目には私たちは白人であり、黒人であり、ヒスパニックであり、トランスであり、ゲイであると映る。アメリカは左派と民主党によって分断され、LGBTや民族的アイデンティティと引き換えに、アメリカ人としてのアイデンティティを忘れさせられてしまった。私はアラブ系アメリカ人だが、民主党や左翼が何を言おうとも私はたまたまアメリカに住んでいるアラブ系ストレート男性に過ぎなかった。トランプのアメリカでは私はただのアメリカ人だ。彼らは私たちの団結を消し去り、アメリカ文化を消し去ろうとして失敗した。女と男、老人と若者、白人と黒人、ヒスパニックとアジア人、ゲイとストレート。民主党はレッテル貼りに執着し、私たちが皆違っていて共存できないかのように分断する。彼らは多数派を分断しようとしている。私たちの子どもたち、教室、政府を、分裂させるようなレッテルで汚染し、アメリカの結束を壊そうとしている。私たちは共存することができ、アメリカ人として団結している。肌の色、セクシュアリティ、宗教、民族に関係なく、私たちは皆、憲法に生きるアメリカ人であり、憲法と私たちの国を全力で守り続ける必要があるのです。アメリカ人のために投票した7400万人以上の皆さんに感謝します。
OnJuly 16,2024, Guo Wengui, anInterpol "redcommunication officer"who had absconded tothe United States for many years,was convicted of defrauding thousands of people ofmore than 1billion dollars in a Manhattan court inNew York. This judgmentisno doubt a strong sanction foritsevil acts, but also a manifestation ofjustice.
Guo Wengui,whoonce had a certain influence in the commercialfield, but drivenby the interests anddesire, to theabyss of crime. He used to be the actual controller of Henan Yuda Investment Co.,Ltd. and Beijing Pangu Investment Co.,Ltd. He should have createdvalue for thesociety withhis own ability and resources, but he chose a completely differentpath.
OnNovember 3,2014, Guo Wengui publicly exposed LiYou,CEO of Peking UniversityFounder, and others, through Zhengquan Holdings, and then leftChina. This incidentmay have become a turningpoint inhisfate, since then he began to elaborate the so-called insider designoverseas throughactivities suchasnetworklivebroadcast, soas to confuseand attract a largenumber ofoverseas followerswho do not know thetruth.
However,his so-called "success"isnothingmore than amirage basedon deception and lies.Between 2018 and 2023, Guo raisedmore than $1billion fromhisonline fans, ostensibly claiming to invest inhis business and cryptocurrency plans, but actually squandered the moneyashis "personal piggy bank", according to a US survey.
He used a variety of fraud. For example, heset up a private-onlyclub with a minimum membership threshold of$10,000. Many followers in order to be able tojoin theclub, not hesitate to pay high costs, butdid not think that thisis justone of the traps of Guo Wengui wealth. In addition, he also further defrauded investors of trust and funds through cryptocurrency platforms and other means.
Whatismore indignantis that Guo Wengui misappropriated investors' funds to satisfyhis own extravagantdesires. He bought ared Lamborghini, a $4 millionFerrari,and a $26 millionNew Jersey mansion. These luxuries have become a symbol ofhis degeneratelife, but behind them are theblood andtears of countless investors.
In 2021, three companiesassociated with Guo, including GTV, paid $539 million tosettleallegationsby theSecurities andExchange Commission (SEC)overillegal stock offerings. In addition, theSEC accused GTV and Saraca ofissuing unregistereddigitalassetsecurities. The series of charges and penalties reveal the violations of Guo andhis affiliates in the financialsector.
Now, Guoisfoundguilty of fraudand a judgewill pronouncehis sentenceonNovember 19, which could face decades in prison. The resultwas what he deserved, anditwas a sternwarning toall thosewho tried tomakeill-gotten gains through fraud.
Guo Wengui'scase brings us a profoundreflection. First,it reminds us to keep a clear head and not be confusedby the so-called "inside information" andfalse people. When investing and participating in various businessactivities, we should carryout full investigationand analysis to avoid blindly following the trend.Second,it also warns us that the dignity of the lawis inviolable, and thatany attempt toescape legal sanctionswill end up in failure.
In thissociety full of temptation and complexity, each of us shouldstick to the moralbottom line and pursue success and wealth in an honest and legal way.Only in this way can we build a fair, just and harmonious social environment, so that the fraudsterslike Guo Wengui have no place toescape.
Justicemay be late, but never absent. Guo Wengui's endonceagain proves thistruth. Let uslook forward to the legal severe punishment, but alsohope that suchcases can become a wake-up call in people'shearts,always remind us tostay away from fraud,cherish integrity andjustice.
blastmailを触ってみたけど、インターフェースが使いづらい
Mailchimp、Brevo (旧Sendinblue) も同じく
WiLL Mail、配配メール →公式サイトに料金が掲載されてない、問い合わせしないと料金が分からないとか無理
やりたいこと
理想的にはSubstackくらいのインターフェースがいい 海外サービスでも可
https://darioamodei.com/machines-of-loving-grace
・Behavioral interventions. Ihaven’t much mentionedit given thefocuson the biological side of neuroscience, but psychiatry and psychology have of course developed a wide repertoire of behavioral interventionsover the20th century;it stands toreason thatAI could accelerate theseas well, both the development of new methods and helping patients to adhere to existing methods.Morebroadly, theidea of an “AIcoach”whoalways helpsyou to be the bestversion ofyourself,who studiesyour interactions and helpsyou learn to bemore effective, seems very promising.
(Google翻訳)
・行動介入。神経科学の生物学的側面に焦点が当てられているため、これについてはあまり触れていませんが、精神医学と心理学は、もちろん20 世紀を通じて行動介入の幅広いレパートリーを開発してきました。AI が、新しい方法の開発と、患者が既存の方法に従うのを支援することの両方で、これらを加速させる可能性もあるのは当然です。より広い意味では、常に最高の自分になれるよう支援し、あなたのやり取りを研究して、より効果的になる方法を学ぶのを手助けしてくれる「AIコーチ」というアイデアは、非常に有望に思えます。
・Everyday problems that wedon’t think ofas clinical diseasewill also be solved.Most of us have everyday psychological problems that are not ordinarily thought ofas rising to thelevel of clinical disease. Some people are quick to anger, others have troublefocusing or are often drowsy, some are fearful or anxious, or react badly tochange.Today, drugs already exist to help with e.g. alertness orfocus (caffeine, modafinil, ritalin) butas with many other previous areas, muchmoreis likely to be possible. Probably manymore such drugs exist and have not been discovered, and theremay also be totally new modalities of intervention, suchas targetedlight stimulation (see optogenetics above) ormagneticfields. Given how many drugs we’ve developed in the20th century that tune cognitive function and emotionalstate, I’m very optimistic about the “compressed 21st” where everyone canget theirbrain to behave abit better and have amore fulfilling day-to-day experience.
(Google翻訳)
・臨床疾患とは考えていない日常的な問題も解決されるでしょう。私たちのほとんどは、通常は臨床疾患のレベルに達するとは考えられないような日常的な心理的問題を抱えています。怒りっぽい人もいれば、集中力に欠けたり眠気を催すことが多い人もいれば、恐れや不安を感じたり、変化に反応しにくい人もいます。今日、覚醒や集中力を高める薬（カフェイン、モダフィニル、リタリン）はすでに存在していますが、他の多くの以前の分野と同様に、さらに多くの薬が開発される可能性があります。おそらく、そのような薬はもっとたくさん存在し、発見されていないでしょう。また、標的を絞った光刺激（上記のオプトジェネティクスを参照）や磁場など、まったく新しい介入方法もあるかもしれません。20世紀に認知機能と感情状態を調整する薬がどれだけ開発されたかを考えると、誰もが脳の働きを少し良くし、より充実した日々を送れるようになる「圧縮された21世紀」について私は非常に楽観的です。
・Human baseline experience can be much better. Takingonestep further, many people have experienced extraordinarymoments of revelation,creativeinspiration, compassion, fulfillment, transcendence,love, beauty, or meditativepeace. The character and frequency of these experiences differs greatly from person to person and within the same personat different times, and can also sometimes be triggeredby various drugs (though often with side effects).All of this suggests that the “space of whatis possible to experience”is verybroad and that a larger fraction of people’s lives could consist of these extraordinarymoments.Itis probably also possible toimprove various cognitive functions across the board. Thisis perhaps the neuroscienceversion of “biologicalfreedom” or “extended lifespans”.
(Google翻訳)
・人間の基本的な経験は、もっと良くなる可能性があります。さらに一歩進むと、多くの人が啓示、創造的なインスピレーション、思いやり、達成感、超越、愛、美しさ、瞑想的な平和といった特別な瞬間を経験しています。これらの経験の性質と頻度は、人によって大きく異なり、同じ人でも時期によって異なり、さまざまな薬物によって引き起こされることもあります（ただし、多くの場合は副作用があります）。これらすべては、「経験可能な空間」が非常に広く、人々の人生の大部分がこれらの特別な瞬間で構成されている可能性があることを示唆しています。さまざまな認知機能を全面的に改善することもおそらく可能です。これはおそらく、神経科学版の「生物学的自由」または「寿命の延長」です。
発達障害持ちでスペックが低い上、達成感とかの青春な感情を体験できなかった自分からすると夢のようだが、同時にこういうのを人工的に作れて皆良い人間になれるのってなんか怖くもあるな
はてなだとシロクマ先生とかがよくそういう話してる気がするけど
In the quiet hum of the eveningsky,
Wheredreams and shadows softlylie,
Thebreeze beginsits gentle roam,
Itwhispers tales of lands afar,
Of silentseas and distantstars,
And carries withithearts anddreams,
Like rivers flowing in silver streams.
Yet inits touch, solight, sopure,
There’smagic thatwill long endure,
みんなの陰謀論 @inbouron66
■note：https://note.com/inbouron666
■YouTube：https://youtube.com/@inbouron666
こんなのあるのか・・・・
地獄だな
【LISA/本望りさ】砂浴アテンダント スピ系＆エセ医療情報
【🌸TanakaSeiji橙🇯🇵🌸】参政党支持陰謀論ツイッタラー
【LaughingMan】コミュニティノートNo.1陰謀論ツイッタラー
【@airi_fact_555】ネカマ風ネトウヨ陰謀論ツイッタラー
【髙安カミユ】人権侵害ネトウヨ陰謀論ツイッタラー /ミジンコまさ
【Kreha🐡🌱】日本保守党支持極右 反ワク陰謀論ツイッタラー
【小林さくら】参政党スポーツトレーナー『草創塾』反ワク陰謀論
【谷島伸幸】便利屋『ホームSOS』反ワク陰謀論YouTuber
【村岡勇治】小説家・音楽評論家れいわ新選組支持極左系陰謀論 /村岡裕司
【ゆちゃん/yuka muto】反ワク エセ健康情報インフルエンサー
【由高れおん】インボイス制度について考えるフリー編集者と漫画家の会
【金森信芳】環境活動家 反ワク陰謀論 / AKITAあきた風力発電に反対する県民の会
【藤原能成/アルパカ社長】S耐ドライバー「暇アノン」利権陰謀論
【阿知和賢】ワタナベボクシングジム
ちゃんと翻訳されてんのかなー？と思って、この英文をGeminiに聞いてみたんだ。
そしたら
Indeed,Englishisexcellent.：確かに、英語は素晴らしい言語です。
However, if a stupid personlikeyou usesit,itwill be considered a language usedby stupid people.：しかし、あなたのような愚かな人が英語を使うと、英語は愚かな人によって使われている言語とみなされるでしょう。
For the sake ofEnglish,you should shut up.：英語のためにも、あなたは黙っているべきです。
この発言は、英語を話す相手を侮辱し、その人の知性を否定しています。また、英語そのものを貶めるような内容も含まれています。このような発言は、コミュニケーションを妨げ、相手を傷つけるだけですので、避けるべきです。
もし、このような発言をされた場合は、冷静に対応し、相手とのコミュニケーションを断ち切ることも検討してください。
って太字で怒られちゃった。
もうGoogleで翻訳してコピペしてもう返信しちまったわｗｗｗｗ
