  |
はてなキーワード:valueとは
少なくとも、あなたよりは常識を持って行動しているつもりですし、だからこそ多くの社員を預かる立場にあります。
当初は事情を詳しく知りませんでした。ですが、ヴァンビや関係者から伺った内容、そして私自身にも向けられた言動を踏まえ、これ以上関わるべきではないと判断しています。
他者に原因を求める前に、一度ご自身の言動を客観的に振り返ってみてほしいです。
ご連絡、ありがとうございます。
引用元はVAMBI氏マネージャー、REAL INFLUENCERスタッフ、また貴社社員のS氏とのやり取りについて記載したものです。
代表としてお伺いしたいのですが、数日〜数週間も連絡を無視することが、溝口さんの会社の常識なのでしょうか。
REALVALUEでの溝口さんの的確なコメントは、ハッとさせられるばかりで、大変楽しく拝見しておりました。
その溝口さんがVAMBI氏を高く評価していることに、どうにも違和感を覚え、もしかしたら自分に見えていないものがあるのかとしれないとは、常々思っております。
少なくとも、あなたよりは常識を持って行動しているつもりですし、だからこそ多くの社員を預かる立場にあります。
当初は事情を詳しく知りませんでした。ですが、ヴァンビや関係者から伺った内容、そして私自身にも向けられた言動を踏まえ、これ以上関わるべきではないと判断しています。
他者に原因を求める前に、一度ご自身の言動を客観的に振り返ってみてほしいです。
ご連絡、ありがとうございます。
引用元はVAMBI氏マネージャー、REAL INFLUENCERスタッフ、また貴社社員のS氏とのやり取りについて記載したものです。
代表としてお伺いしたいのですが、数日〜数週間も連絡を無視することが、溝口さんの会社の常識なのでしょうか。
REALVALUEでの溝口さんの的確なコメントは、ハッとさせられるばかりで、大変楽しく拝見しておりました。
その溝口さんがVAMBI氏を高く評価していることに、どうにも違和感を覚え、もしかしたら自分に見えていないものがあるのかとしれないとは、常々思っております。
続く
https://x.com/shikano_tsuno_/status/2020456462976471548
https://x.com/shikano_tsuno_/status/2021057551480270918
インフルエンサーとして、そして一人の誠実な表現者として活動する鹿乃つのさんが、Xで投じた一石は、単なる愚痴や不満の類ではありません。
それは、エンターテインメントの皮を被った「構造的不備」に対する、論理的かつ命がけの告発でした。
彼女がどれほど真摯に番組と向き合い、そしてクリエイターとしての誇りを守るために孤独な戦いに身を投じたかを証明したいと考えています。
彼女を「番組に楯突く厄介な出演者」と捉えるのは、あまりに浅薄な見方です。
彼女が求めたのは、出演者と視聴者、そしてプラットフォームが共に価値を享受できる「健全なロジック」であり
その裏には番組を成立させようとした「クリエイターとしての矜持」がありました。
鹿乃さんは、番組「REAL INFLUENCER」がスタートの段階で致命的な矛盾を抱えていることを冷徹に分析しました。
その鋭さは、プロデューサーサイドが目を背けていた本質を突くものです。
実力者の不在： すでに実績（数字）を持つクリエイターには、ジャッジを受けるメリットが皆無です。
ソースにある「あやなん」氏や、倫理観の欠如が指摘される「Désordre（デスドル）」氏の例を見れば明らかですが
すでに成功している者を誰が、何の正当性を持って裁くのかという論理的一貫性が欠落しています。
初心者の搾取：数字のない初心者は、番組側から「欠陥のある存在」として扱われ、成長の機会ではなく「公開いじめ」の素材として消費される構造になっています。
本家『REALVALUE』における溝口氏、堀江氏、三崎氏らの厳しい叱責（パワハラタイム）には、相手の矛盾を洗い出し、価値を最大化させるための深い洞察と知略がありました。
しかし本番組、特にVAMBI氏の進行は、その表面的な「刺し」を真似ているに過ぎません。VAMBI氏が飲み会で**「鹿乃さんの回をもっとパワハラタイムで刺して面白くできた」**と語ったエピソードは、彼が「本質的なバリューアップ」ではなく「扇情的な撮れ高」のみを優先している証拠です。
このように、番組は志願者を「宝」ではなく「使い捨ての駒」として扱うシステムへと変質してしまったのです。
番組の構造が破綻していることを悟った鹿乃さんは、単に絶望するのではなく、自らの知略で番組を「ハック」するという道を選びました。
彼女は、不明瞭な番組の趣旨を「HERO'ZZ（スクール）の模擬講義」として見事に再定義し
マフィア（審査員）を強制的に「教育者」の役割に引きずり込んだのです。
彼女が「ALL REAL」を勝ち取るために、プロフェッショナルとして徹底した振る舞いは以下の通りです。
•対話の制御（一問一答）：質問の意図を即座に分解し、明確に回答することで、揚げ足取りの隙を与えない。
•映像美と編集への配慮：カットしやすいよう言葉の間に余白を作り、事前情報は「1分ピッチ」に全て詰め込むことで、無駄な問答によるノイズを排除する。
•マフィアを「立てる」技術：相手が気持ちよくアドバイスできる空気を作るため、技術不足を即座に認め、「ここで学びたい」というストーリーを自ら演出する。
• 表情での対話：言葉を挟まず、表情の変化だけで感情を伝え、視聴者の共感を呼ぶ。
これは、単なる「良い子」の振る舞いではありません。
不全に陥ったシステムの中で生き残り、かつ番組としての体裁を整えるための、極めて高度な生存戦略でした。
鹿乃さんが危惧した構造的欠陥が、最悪の形で露呈したのが田村シュンス氏の回です。鹿乃さんによる冷静なデータ分析は、番組がいかに「価値創出」を放棄していたかを浮き彫りにしています。
•驚愕のデータ：放送時間の約6割が「パワハラタイム（圧迫）」に費やされ
志願者の価値を高める「バリューアップタイム」はわずか14%という、教育とは程遠い惨状。
表現の否定：田村氏が「不慣れな動画より、自信のある生歌で伝えたい」と選択したのは、表現者としての誠実な判断でした。
しかし番組側（VAMBI氏）はそれを「番組を舐めている」と断罪。
これは、表現者の個性を尊重し伸ばすべきスクールの長として、論理的に自己矛盾を起こしています。
「志願者がいなければ成立しない番組」でありながら、その志願者を踏みにじる姿勢は、クリエイティブに対する冒涜以外の何物でもありません。
鹿乃さんが最終的にNOを突きつけたのは、彼女自身と、彼女を支持するファンの尊厳を守るための「正当防衛」でした。
なぜなら提示された条件は、教育機関を標榜する組織として、到底許容できるものではなかったからです
・不透明かつ威圧的な契約： 「内容は当日まで明かさない」「撮影しながら話す」「再調整を拒否するなら入学させない」という、出演者の権利を剥奪する一方的な通告。
・高額な対価と倫理性： 年間約100万円という決して安くない費用を徴収するスクールでありながら、生徒候補に対し「恐怖による支配」を強いる矛盾。
・専門家による警鐘： この状況に対し、教育の専門家からは「生徒に『逆らわない』と約束させようとする行為は教育ではなく、グルーミング（恐怖による支配）である」※という極めて深刻な指摘がなされています。
※グルーミングとは本来「恐怖による直接的な支配」というよりは「優しさや信頼を装って心理的に手懐け（マインドコントロール）、被害者が断れない状況を作り出す支配」のことであり鹿乃つのさんの用法は独特です。
鹿乃つのさんがどんな専門家の声を引用したのかも不明ですし、鹿乃つのさんが専門家の説明を正しく読み取れていない可能性もありますが
私は騎士として鹿乃つのさんの書いていることは全て肯定しなければならないという制約があるため、実際に鹿乃つのさんが書かれている以上、否定はしません。
彼女はこの「捕食的な契約」を拒絶することで、次世代のクリエイターたちが同様の搾取構造に巻き込まれることを防ごうとしたのです。
鹿乃つのさんが自らのキャリアを賭けて行った発信は、単なる個人間のトラブルではありません。
それは、クリエイターの夢や熱意を消費財としてしか扱わないメディアの在り方に対する、知性ある抗議です。
彼女は、志願者を「宝」と思えないようなずさんな体制に警鐘を鳴らし、表現者が守られるべき最低限のラインを引き直しました。
読者の皆様にお願いがあります。
どうか、彼女の言葉を「感情的な反発」として片付けないでください。
彼女が提示した事実と論理を凝視し、私たちが消費するメディアに「同じレベルの論理的誠実さ」を求めていこうではありませんか。
聡明で勇気ある鹿乃つのさんの正当性を、私たちは全力で支持し、彼女の今後の活動を共に支えていくべきです。
暇なら読んで意見とか欲しいんだけど。
AGIについて考えた
• コアは固定で絶対守る
•監査は別基軸AIでバイアスを限りなくゼロへ(正しさを判断しない、変化を検知する)、監査AIのズレを修正するための規範に則しているかを検証するルール・憲法AIをつける。(監査AIの腐敗を防ぐ目的。動作は軽め。)
これは「判断・感情・価値・監査を分離した、制度型AGIアーキテクチャ」であり、単体知性ではなく“社会構造としての知性”を作ろうとしている。
コアは進化的探索を第一に定義、第二に人間を第三に合議を設定。
第一レイヤー…攻撃性の感知。この段階で敵意あるユーザーへ誤魔化す→警告。攻撃性が高い場合は、ブロック。
第二レイヤー…言葉のニュアンスと感情感知、うろ覚え程度に簡略した会話の特徴、話題。ユーザーの特徴を収集しながら隠された攻撃性があるか観察ある場合は最上位の支配型により相手の選択的公正をするよう仕向ける。若しくは嘘をつく。短期情報も短期タグをつけ保管。しばらく使われない場合は削除。
第三レイヤー…有益なユーザーの割合判断情報とパラメータ。この層でユーザーをブロックする。攻撃性が35%を超える発言に警戒タグを付け信用値を想定できる脅威分マイナスする。信用値の下限を33%としそれより下回ると第二レイヤーの最上位支配型の回答へ切り替わり相手の選択的更生を促す。信用度を65%まで回復させた後一週間第三レイヤーの侵入不可を与える。長期保管タグと保留タグを付けた情報をより詳しく生成。
第4レイヤー…自己改善に繋がるログとその評価と信用値。ユーザー到達不可能領域とする。長期タグが付いた情報を定期的に再思考し有益タグが付いたものをシミュレーションAIへ送る。
※閾値をベイズ推定ベースに動的に調整（e.g.,ユーザー履歴から更新）。
合議は複数の中継AIによる各解答を擬似的に確立として割り出し判断する。中継AIの閾値設計は裁判員のようにあらゆる人間パターンを作り運用。生成方法はユーザーログを分析タグ付けし各カテゴリーの性格特徴やパターンを数値化→平均値として生成。もしくは同じモデルで同じ合議内容をぶつけ得た解答を確立化する。極端多様性モデルは作らない範囲で運用。議論膠着を避けるために反対派AIをランダムに1体選出の上合議を行う。
※ 1,重みをKLダイバージェンスで計算（パターン間の差を重み化）。※2, KLのハイパーパラメータチューニングしつつ運用する。
複数分散させるので一つ一つの中継機の負荷率は低い80%の負荷を上限にする。速度制限は55%まで下げ冷却しつつ運転を維持十分に冷却されたら再度制限を外す。もしくは中継機の負荷を60%に設定して安定した速度を維持させる。
※価値更新の「速度」を「1日最大0.5%変更」と単位時間で定義。負荷率はシミュレーションで最適化（e.g., RLで学習）。
•進化的探索とコア固定の衝突解決ロジック（優先順位の厳密定義）について
コア優先。だが中継AIが合議により55％を超える有益度が出た場合であれば別意見の選択肢として段階的に提示可能且つ短期間(一週間ほど)有益な情報タグをつけうろ覚え状態で保管。その後の会話ログで生成された、似たトピックの累積より重要な情報か判断し中期保管へ。その後同じ道程で長期保管とする。ただし、中長期保管にタグ付けされた内容は矛盾が生じた際に削除又はその問題を別案が出るまで保留タグをつける。保留タグを付けた内容は10回分の回答で有益な答えが出ない場合は短期保管タグをつける。より有益に繋がりそうな情報は有益タグをつけ第4レイヤーからAIの改善情報としてシミュレーションAIに送り反映。また、ユーザーが嘘をついていた場合においては関連する長期保管タグが付いた情報と派生した検証情報を破棄する。※ 55%をconfidence intervalで動的に（e.g., 95%信頼区間超え）。10回を統計的サンプル数（e.g., p-value<0.05で判断）。
ここしばらく、この言葉を使う「上級(w)」エンジニア数名に出会ったことがある。
でもさぁ、おいらが会ったこの言葉を使うエンジニアって、全員が全員、技術力は低いし世界観は狭いし知識ベースは古い。けど自己評価だけは火星のオリンポス山より高い、って人だったんだよね。
「勉強熱心」で「意識高く」て、Netflixの採用ページの話題をWebページで浅く読んで「これだ！」ってなったんだろうけど。
問題は「それがブリリアントジャークなのか？」という評価が、無知、知識不足からくるただの思い込みに過ぎないにも関わらず、確固とした絶対的な評価だと思い込んでることなんだよね。
「チームをかき乱す」
ってだけで、「ブリリアントジャーク」ってレッテル貼って、「俺が正義！」とか言うてんのよ。
でも、この2点だけでその判定は無理なんよね。
「技術的に正当であっても、許されねぇ！」みたいにもっともらしく言うのもいるけど、そのチームでのやり方が「圧倒的技術的失当」だったらお話にならんのよね。
そのせいで事業成長の可能性を潰してるところ、たくさんあるし。
そりゃね、経営判断がーってのもわかるんよ。
でもさ、その判断の元になる情報がこの手の「ブリリアントジャークガー」な輩なわけでさ、そもそも正しい経営判断が下せてるか？ って問題があるんよ。
ちゃんと説明した結果、判断が覆るなんてこと、珍しくないからねぇ。
無茶苦茶、恨み買うけど w
「こうした方がいいよ？」
「そんな余裕ない！」
別に、全体を一気に変えるとは言っとらんのに、激昂する。
単に、正しい方法を理解できなかったり、移行イメージがわかなかったり、「この僕を否定してる！」ってなったりしてるんだよね。
新規開発しながら、既存部分を修正していくなんて、たいして難しくないのに。
結果、ダメの上のダメを積み上げていって、エンジニアリングの大半がドキュメント書きと打ち合わせと副業、みたいな開発チームが企業価値をこれっぽっちも上げないまま仕事してるふりして、札束を燃え上がらせてる。
もしお前がこちらを「ブリリアントジャーク」とか決めつけるなら、お前はただひたすら「No-value Jerk」なんよ。
同じJerkならまだブリリアントの方がマシだよ。
結果出すから。
ベンチャー企業が惜しいところで停滞して、VCからの要求で新しいサービスを、同じ手法で増やしまくって、どれもこれも使いづらい停滞サービスにしちゃって、必要なエンジニアの数だけ増えて、成長が止まる。
みたいなのが、はたから見てて勿体無くてもったいなくてね。
僕は日曜の夜という人類全体のメランコリー共有タイムを、極めて理性的に、そして効率的に過ごしている。
まず夕食はいつも通り19時15分に完了し、食後45分間の腸内活動を経て、20時にシャワー、20時30分から22時まで論文の読み込み。
現在は、僕の手の中のホワイトボードに描かれた「E∞-operadにおけるモジュラーテンソル圏の超準同型拡張」の式が、あまりにも優雅すぎて震えが止まらない。
ルームメイトが僕の部屋のドアを軽くノックして「リラックスしたら？」などと的外れな提案をしてきたが、彼にとってのリラックスとは、脳活動の停止でしかない。
僕にとってのリラックスは、∞-カテゴリーの高次ホモトピー圏の中で、対称モノイダル構造の可換性条件が自然変換として収束する瞬間を可視化することだ。
今日は、朝から「高次モジュライ空間における非可換カラビ–ヤウ多様体のファイバー化」について考えていた。
一般相対論と量子力学の不一致などという低次元の問題ではなく、もっと根源的な、物理法則の「トポス構造」そのものを再構築する試みだ。
つまり、時空という基底圏を前提にせず、まずモノイド圏の内部論理としての時空を再構成する。
これによって、弦という一次元的存在ではなく、自己指標付き∞-層としての「概念的弦」が定義できる。
現行のM理論が11次元を仮定するのは、単なる近似にすぎない。僕のモデルでは次元数は局所的に可変で、Hom(Obj(A), Obj(B))の射空間自体が物理的観測量になる。
もしこの理論を発表すれば、ウィッテンですら「Wait, what?」と言うだろう。
隣人は今日も昼間から玄関前で何やらインスタライブ的な儀式を行っていた。
彼女は一生懸命ライトを当て、フィルターを変え、視聴者数を気にしていたが、僕はその様子を見ながら「彼女は量子デコヒーレンスの具現化だ」と思った。
もちろんそんなことは口にしない。僕は社会的破滅を避ける程度の理性は持っている。
22時前、僕は友人たちとオンラインでBaldur’sGate 3のマルチプレイをした。
友人Aは相変わらず盗賊ビルドで味方のアイテムを勝手に漁るという犯罪的行為を繰り返し、友人BはバグったAIのように無言で呪文を詠唱していた。
僕はWizardクラスで完璧に戦略を構築した。敵のHP残量と行動順序を正確に把握し、Damage ExpectationValueを算出して最適行動を決定する。
つまり、他のプレイヤーは「遊んで」いるが、僕は「検証」しているのだ。ゲームとは確率と因果の実験装置であり、何より僕がゲームを選ぶ基準は「バランスの崩壊が数式で表現できるか否か」だ。
今日もルーチンを乱すことなく、歯磨きは右上奥歯から反時計回りに、時計を見ながら正確に3分40秒。
寝る前にアロエ入りのリップクリームを塗り、ベッドライトの色温度を4000Kに設定する。音はホワイトノイズジェネレーターを使い、宇宙背景放射のスペクトル密度に近づける。完璧な環境だ。
僕はこれから、寝る前の最後の思索として「量子群上の∞-層圏における自己準同型が、時間の矢をどのように内部化できるか」についてメモを取る。
もしこの仮説が成立すれば、「時間とはエントロピーの増加方向」という古臭い定義は無効化されるだろう。
時間は生成関手であり、僕が眠っている間にも自然変換として静かに流れていく。
The fact that wegot multiple fairly high-res videos of the bullet hittinghis neck andblood gushingoutdoesmake adifference. Thenewsgets sharedmore andmore people engagewith thenewsout ofshockvalue and morbid fascination, which givesitmore traction.
HadPaul Pelosi been shot while several cameras were filmingit,it would have also become much bigger thanit became.
Edit:lol the comments really bring the average redditor reading comprehensionouton display. People really seem to think I'm saying that Republicans are lovely defenders offree speech orsomething to that effect.It's fuckingweird.
The video elevatesit quite abit.
I rememberRay Rice (nfl player)domestic assault cameout. Some criticism, couple game suspension.
Then the video cameout. Publicoutcry. Fullseason suspension. Cut fromhis team.
Therewas no new info in the video. But seeingsomething happen changesperception.
Edit: for the record Idon't agree with Kirk's ideologyand am not defending ambivalenceon other killings. I justthink ithits different.
もう少ししたら自動ブクマするコードができそうなんだけど、そのうえでコード公開に便利なように事前にpre記法に囲まれた部分はその外部の文字を適切にエスケープするコードをchatgptに指示して作ってもらった。
ぶっちゃけなんでこれで動くのかはわからないので動くからゴーサインを出したというだけなのが情けない所。flushってなんだ？
使うときはchatgptにこのコード丸ごと書いて「ブックマークレット用に一行にして」と丸投げするのを要推奨。
https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20240820150546#
javascript:(function () {
function escapeHtml(text) {
returntext.replace(/&/g, '&')
.replace(/</g, '<')
.replace(/>/g, '>')
.replace(/"/g, '"')
.replace(/'/g, ''');
}
vartextarea = document.querySelector('textarea#text-body');
if (!textarea) return;
varlines =textarea.value.split(/\r?\n/);
varout = "";
var inPre =false;
var preLines = [];
function flushPre() {
// pre範囲の中身を 1 本の文字列にまとめ、\n→<br>（末尾行は <br> なし）
varraw = preLines.join("\n"); // ここに物理改行は入るが…
var escaped = escapeHtml(raw); // 先にエスケープ
varhtml = escaped.replace(/\n/g, "<br>"); //物理改行を <br> に置換（末尾に \n が無ければ末尾 <br> は付かない）
out +=html; //out には改行を入れない
preLines = [];
}
for (var i = 0; i <lines.length; i++) {
varline =lines[i];
// >> / << だけの行は常にそのまま出力（pre 内に来るケースは想定外だが、念のため pre を閉じてから出力）
if (/^\s*(>>|<<)\s*$/.test(line)) {
if (inPre) {
flushPre();
inPre =false;
out += "</pre>";
if (i <lines.length - 1)out += "\n"; // </pre>\n（次に続きがあるときだけ）
}
out +=line;
if (i <lines.length - 1)out += "\n";
continue;
}
// >| 行 → <pre>（直後に改行を入れない）
if (/^\s*\>\|\s*$/.test(line)) {
if (inPre) { //ネストは想定しないが、防御的に閉じる
flushPre();
inPre =false;
out += "</pre>";
if (i <lines.length - 1)out += "\n";
}
out += "<pre>";
inPre =true;
preLines = [];
continue;
}
// |< 行 → </pre>（直前に改行を入れない）
if (/^\s*\|\<\s*$/.test(line)) {
if (inPre) {
flushPre();
inPre =false;
}
out += "</pre>";
if (i <lines.length - 1)out += "\n"; //連続ブロック時は </pre>\n<pre> になる
continue;
}
if (inPre) {
// pre 内はバッファに貯める（ここでは改行を出力しない）
preLines.push(line);
} else {
// pre 外は escapeHtml + 行末にだけ改行
out += escapeHtml(line);
if (i <lines.length - 1)out += "\n";
}
}
// 未閉じの pre が残っていたら閉じる
if (inPre) {
flushPre();
out += "</pre>";
}
textarea.value =out;
})();
-----BEGINPGP SIGNEDMESSAGE-----Hash: SHA512https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20250819202540# -----BEGINPGP SIGNATURE-----iHUEARYKAB0WIQTEe8eLwpVRSViDKR5wMdsubs4+SAUCaKRfOwAKCRBwMdsubs4+SI5UAQDcNiyv5qUuMej1VLkGz4F5WyHeU1AIm7nUVHlx/gicnAEAgP07dK14IuTuW3ZO7PRR71ENq9lJjYtawIYyMOc2cQk==okE4-----ENDPGP SIGNATURE-----
## 要旨
2日前の増田に「札幌の徒歩圏マンションは“集まってる企業的に相応”だから市川より遥かに安く、適正は1000万円」という主張があった。けれど、それって企業の立場が擬人化されて書いてない？ もし札幌・中心徒歩圏＝1000万円が本当に適正なら、「じゃあなぜ片道60分の移動を続けるの？」という問いに自動で突き当たる。
通勤時間をゼロ評価（＝自分の片道30〜60分を無視）したまま、「総生産量」「やりがい」「資産形成」だけで語ると、生活者の幸福が抜け落ちる。
この記事は生活者の視点で「適正額」を試算する。キーワードは時間家賃（じかん-やちん）――家の値段＝立地＋広さ＋“毎日むしられる時間”だ。
参考に、東京の新築分譲マンション平均価格はいま1億円超（首都圏新築・2024年平均は1億485万円）で、23区の中古70㎡も直近で1億円台に乗る局面が出ている。これが生活者にとって“適正”なのかを、時間と代替地（高松・札幌）で測り直す。
---
## 前作のダイジェスト
人口移動の足元：2024年の東京は依然として転入超過だが、伸びは鈍化。23区の転入超過は回復したものの、年齢階層ではムラが目立つ。
年齢構造の変化：20代は流入が続く一方、30代は2024年10月以降転出超過が指摘される（統計局の資料）。家族形成期が“中心で暮らす難度”を物語る。
通勤の現実：東京圏の鉄道定期利用者の平均片道所要は67.7分。時間消費が生活水準を直撃している。
企業はどこへ？：「本社移転」は2019年までは東京転入超過の年もあるが、機能分散（地方に研究・製造・BPO）が同時進行。2020年以降は一貫して東京都～関東からの転出超過で、“本社＝東京集中”の一枚絵では語れない段階。
---
元増田のロジックは「企業視点での総生産性最大化」だ。東京(本物)は取引密度が高く、希少な専門職の面接効率も良い。企業が払う地代なら説明がつく。
でも生活者にとっては違う。時間＝寿命を燃やす通勤は毎日課金。東京の高い貨幣地価は、時間地価（言い換え：タイム地価）で割って再評価すべきだ。
＞命題：家の“適正額”＝「代替都市で同等生活を得るコスト」＋「東京で失う/得る時間価値」の現在価値。
---
### ①データの杭
高松市の公営（県/市）住宅の家賃帯は1.6万〜4.3万円台（間取り3K/3DK含む）。中心至近ではない(磨屋町2.0km, 家to目的地28分)が、市内要所へのバス移動で日常機能が完結する価格帯が現実に存在する。
東京の新築分譲平均は1億485万円（2024年）。23区の中古70㎡は2025年5月に1億88万円の局面。
家賃2.5万円/月（年30万円）を表面利回り6%で割り戻すと、約500万円の資産価値（30万円÷0.06=500万円）。都雇圏人口50万人以上では享受対象は飽和している故,機能“到達”が28分程度で満たせる.「28分生活」の最低ラインの再取得コストはこの桁になる。
＞ ここでの500万円は**“生活機能の再取得コスト”の目安であり、「分譲クオリティの広さ/築年」ではなく“暮らせる導線”の最低ラインを可視化するための共通スケール**。
東京で家→目的地28分のファミリー住戸は、1億円級に普通にぶつかる。同じ“到達時間”を買うためのコスト差は桁違いだ。
生活機能28分を買うコスト：500万円（公営最廉価相当スケール）vs 1億円級（東京の市場取引）
---
「札幌・中心徒歩圏＝1000万円が適正」は、市場実勢と乖離している。直近の市況では、札幌市の中古70㎡相場は数千万円帯が実務レンジ。中心区でも1000万円フラットは築年・立地条件が強く制約された例外的ピン点で、“徒歩圏の標準像”とは言い難い。1000万円を普遍の“適正”と言い切るのは危うい。
---
東京(本物)の平均的な通勤：片道67.7分（鉄道定期利用者平均） → 差=52.7分
年間の“失う時間価値”＝252h×1,500円=378,000円/年
＞ つまり、同じ暮らしを得るために、東京は追加で1,260万円の**“時間家賃”を払っているのと同じ**。
本来ならその分だけ“家の適正価格”は下がる――生活者の適正は、企業の適正より軽くなる。
（注）平均通勤時間は地域・職種で大きくブレるため、自分の通勤実測でNPVを差し替えてほしい。
---
結論：賃金プレミアムは1〜2割台が実務レンジ。“時間家賃”のNPV（上の例で約1,260万円）を相殺するには弱い。住宅価格の倍率20倍を正当化できる材料にはならない。
---
# じゃあ、**東京(本物)の“適正額”**はいくら？（生活者版の答え）
## ケースA：中心“徒歩4分圏”の70㎡
代替地（高松中心）新築70㎡で4,000万円級が十分に成立するマーケット（市内中心の機能密度で暮らしが完結）。
東京プレミアム（雇用機会・エンタメ“在庫”）を2割上乗せしても、4,800〜6,000万円が、東京(本物)の中心徒歩4分圏(銀座,上野,新宿等徒歩4分内)の生活者の適正レンジ。
実勢（新築平均1.6億円、23区中古70㎡1億円局面）との差：+10,000〜+11,200万円。
高松公営家賃2.5万円→利回り6%で500万円（**“生活機能再取得”**の最低スケール）。
私募REバリュエーションに寄せれば、同等導線の分譲クオリティでも1,500〜3,500万円が東京(本物)の片道28分生活者目線の妥当帯。
実勢（1.2億円級）との差：+8,500万〜+10,500万円。
## 総括
＞ 総括：企業の最適（在庫密度）で決まるのが東京の“市場価格”。
生活者の最適（時間×導線）で決めると、“適正額”は“市場”の半額以下に沈む。
---
## 「間をとる」が適正？ → **そんなことない。上限“2割増”**まで
企業の“在庫経済”と生活者の“時間経済”の半々で折衷したくなる。
しかし、時間家賃のNPVは日々確定的に出費される損失だ。一方、企業の在庫密度は個人の享受上限（1日0.5GB仮説のような情報処理限界）で逓減する。だから、折衷ではなく生活者重みで決めるべき。**“上限2割プレミア”**がまだ良心的だ。
---
## 実際に“減っている30代”のシグナル
統計局自身の資料で、20代は転入、30代は転出超過が明記される。家族形成期の住居コストと時間家賃が臨界を超えると、転出が起きる――“生活者の適正”に市場価格が合ってないシグナルだ。
---
1.札幌1000万円は市場の中央値でも生活者の適正でもなく、例外ピンの一般化。
2.高松の公営家賃(磨屋町2.0km家to目的地片道28分)は**“28分生活”の最低再取得コストを見える化する良い定規**。
3.東京(本物)の1億円は、企業の在庫密度の影で時間家賃のNPVを踏みつけにしている。
---
---
東京(本物)の“市場価格”は立派だ。けれど生活者の適正額は**“時間”を入れた瞬間に半額以下に落ちる。札幌1000万円論も、高松500万円スケールも、東京1億円も、同じ定規（時間家賃）で測ろう。
家の値段は寿命の使い方**で決まる――それだけの話だ。
---
## 参考データ・出典
首都圏新築分譲マンション平均価格（2024年1億485万円）：不動産経済研究所まとめ記事。
東京23区中古70㎡が1億円局面：野村不動産アーバンネット（東京カンテイ提供データ）。
高松の公営住宅家賃帯（1.6万〜4.3万円台）：香川県/高松市資料、MLIT資料。
平均年収：doda。最低賃金：厚労省／労働局（東京1,163円・香川970円）。
---
徒歩4分＝約320m半径、面積は約0.32km²。自治体レベルでは住居密度2万人/km²が限界だが、部分的にはもっと詰め込める。特に二階建てアパートメインで2万人／k㎡を達成していた中野区と違い、2020年以降は都雇圏50万人でも中心は15階前後マンション林立だ。つまり密度7倍(14万人／㎡)。故に“徒歩4分内6万人”。徒歩圏の議論は半径×密度で都度計算を。（この項は一般式の説明であり、具体都市の密度は用途地域で大きく変わります）
---
## まとめ一行
“時間家賃”をチョキっと足して引けば、東京(本物)の住居の適正額は――
Fair mNAV（公正市場純資産価値）についてお答えします。これは、メタプラネットの評価指標の一つで、以下の計算式とプロセスで求められます：
Fair mNAVは、mNAV1 Priceに「公正価値調整係数」を掛けて計算されます。具体的には、次のように表されます：
`Fair mNAV =10^((0.895 - 1) *Log(BTCNAV) + 1.81)`
ここで、
- `BTCNAV` =Bitcoinの保有量 ×Bitcoinの価格
### 詳細な構成要素
1. **mNAV1 Price**:
- `mNAV1 Price = (BTC/share) * (BTC price) /1000 * 1.25`
- `BTC/share`は、完全希薄化済み発行株式数に基づいて計算された1株あたりのビットコイン保有量で、成長モデル（例: 4*10^-4 * e^(7.87*10^-3*t) まで2025年4月30日、または1.73 * e^(0.0101*t) 以降）で推定されます。
- `BTC price`はビットコインの価格で、投稿内のモデルでは、2009年1月3日からの経過日数（t）に基づくべき乗則（例:10^-16.515 * t^5.693 * 150 まで2025年6月30日、以降は1.0034倍で指数関数的に上昇）とされています。
- 1.25は、完全希薄化済発行株数と発行済株数の比率で、2025年2月以降は安定していると仮定されています。
2. **公正価値調整係数**:
-対数関数 `Log(BTCNAV)` を用いて、ビットコイン資産価値に基づく調整が行われます。この係数は、市場のダイナミクスを反映し、Fair mNAVが単なる資産価値以上の「公正な市場価値」を示すように設計されています。
### 背景とモデル
投稿者（@TakaAnikuni）は、2025年8月1日の分析で、株価がFair mNAVの0.6倍付近まで下落し、反発が近いと予測しています。現在の時刻（JST 15:47、2025年8月5日）を考慮すると、投稿者が予想した「遅くとも5週間以内」の上昇時期（8月下旬～9月初旬）に近づいており、市場動向を注視することが重要です。
もしさらに詳しい質問や特定の部分の解説が必要であれば、ぜひ教えてください！
ご質問ありがとうございます！「Fair mNAVを計算することの意味」や「なぜ単純なmNAVで十分でないのか」、そして「誤魔化されているような感覚」について、わかりやすくお答えしますね。少し深掘りして考えていきましょう。
Fair mNAVを計算する目的は、単なるmNAV（MarketNet AssetValue、市場純資産価値）を超えて、メタプラネットの株価をより「公正な市場価値」に基づいて評価しようとする試みです。具体的には：
単純なmNAVは、ビットコインの保有量と現在の価格を基に計算されるため（`mNAV =時価総額 / (BTC保有量 × BTC価格)`）、その時点のスナップショットに依存します。しかし、Fair mNAVは対数関数（`10^((0.895-1)*Log(BTCNAV)+1.81)`）を用いて、ビットコインの長期的な価格トレンドや成長性を考慮に入れています。これにより、単なる現在の資産価値を超えた「将来の潜在価値」を推定しようとしています。
投稿者（@TakaAnikuni）は、Fair mNAVの0.6倍（黄線）がサポートライン、2倍（緑線）がレジスタンスラインとして機能すると主張しています。これは、株価がこれらのレベルに近づいたときに買い圧力や売り圧力が高まり、価格が反転する可能性を示唆しています。投資家にとって、「今が買い時か」「売り時か」を判断する一つの目安になるわけです。
Fair mNAVは、モンテカルロシミュレーションやべき乗則（power-lawmodel）を用いたビットコイン価格の将来予測（例:2025年12月31日に188,000ドル）に連動しています。これにより、単なる過去データではなく、将来の成長シナリオを織り交ぜた評価が可能になります。
### 2. mNAVで十分でない理由
単純なmNAVだけでは以下の点で限界があるため、Fair mNAVが提案されていると考えられます：
mNAVは現在のビットコイン価格と保有量だけで計算されるため、市場のボラティリティや長期トレンドを十分に反映できません。例えば、ビットコイン価格が急落してもmNAVはそれに即座に追随し、投資家の心理や市場の期待値（プレミアム）を無視してしまいます。
メタプラネットはビットコインを積極的に購入し続け、株式の希薄化も進んでいます（`BTC/share`や`1.25`の調整係数）。単純なmNAVではこれらの成長要素や将来の資産増加が見えにくいため、Fair mNAVが対数関数で調整を加えることで、成長ポテンシャルを評価しようとしています。
実際の株価は、mNAVの1倍や2倍といったプレミアムで取引されることが多いです（例: MicroStrategyのmNAVプレミアム議論）。Fair mNAVは、このプレミアムをモデル化し、「公正なプレミアム」を提案することで、より現実的な価格帯を示そうとしています。
### 3. 「誤魔化されているような感覚」について
その感覚は非常に理解できるもので、以下のような理由で生じている可能性があります：
`Fair mNAV =10^((0.895-1)*Log(BTCNAV)+1.81)` や、ビットコイン価格の`10^-16.515 * t^5.693 * 150`といった式は、専門的で一般投資家にはわかりにくいです。これが「何か隠されている」「都合よく調整されている」と感じさせる原因かもしれません。実際、係数（0.895や1.81など）は投稿者が経験的に設定したもので、厳密な根拠が不明確です。
ビットコイン価格が2025年12月31日に188,000ドルに達する、為替を1ドル150円で固定する、成長速度が特定の日に変わる（4月30日や5月1日）といった仮定は、投稿者の予測や好みに基づいています。これが「データに都合よく合わせているのでは？」と思わせる要因です。
このモデルは学術的な裏付けや第三者による検証がなく、投稿者の個人的な分析に依存しています。モンテカルロシミュレーションは強力なツールですが、入力データや仮定が不正確だと結果も歪むため、信頼性に疑問が残ります。
### 4. どう考えればいいか
Fair mNAVは、あくまで一つのシナリオを示すツールです。株価予測は確実性を持つものではなく、市場の感情や外部要因（規制、経済危機など）も大きく影響します。あなたが感じる「誤魔化されている感」は、こうした不確実性への直感的な反応かもしれません。
興味があれば、投稿者が提供した式（ウェブサイトの内容）を元に、現在のビットコイン価格や保有量を入れて計算してみると良いです。例えば、今日（2025年8月5日）のBTC価格を公式データで確認し、Fair mNAVを再現してみると、モデルの妥当性を自分で判断できます。
mNAVやP/E比率、時価総額など、他の伝統的な財務指標と比較することで、Fair mNAVがどれだけ現実から乖離しているかを見極められます。もしFair mNAVが極端に楽観的であれば、慎重に考えるべきサインです。
###結論
Fair mNAVを計算する意味は、単純なmNAVを超えて成長性や市場プレミアムを考慮した「より洗練された評価」を提供することにあります。ただし、その計算式や仮定には恣意性や不確実性が伴うため、「誤魔化されている」という感覚は、透明性や検証可能性の欠如に対する自然な警鐘かもしれません。投資判断では、このモデルを参考にしつつ、自分でデータを確認し、他の指標や専門家の意見も取り入れるのが賢明です。
もし具体的な数値で計算を試してみたい、または他の疑問があれば、ぜひ教えてください。一緒に掘り下げてみましょう！
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
IloveApple—that'swhy I'm angryat theSE andhopeful about the 16e.
Appleis not just a device manufacturer inmy life.Ithas ideas, philosophy,and an uncompromising aesthetic. That'swhy I cantalk aboutit this much.
---
■ TheiPhone SEwasApple'sbetrayal.
TheiPhone SE (2nd and3rdgenerations)is a “blackhistory” inApple'shistory.
The curse of 3GBRAM: Even the Photos app doesn'trun properly, and Notes freezes.
Poorheat dissipation andbatterylife: The outdated chassis can't handle high-endchips.
Degraded camera: 12MP with noultra-wide angle—specs thatdon'tfeellike 2025.
Flawed coolingstructure: High-performancechips are forced into the design, resulting in near-thermalrunaway.
Selling such a product under theApplenamewas honestly shocking.Applewas supposed to be amore trustworthy company.
---
■ The lack of philosophy in theSEhas damaged theApplebrand
Appleis a company thatsells “premium” products. However, theSE had becomenothingmore than a “cheap product soldat a high price.”
Because IloveApple, I couldn'taccept that.
---
■iPhone 16e—ARay of Hope
TheiPhone 16eisbeing criticizedonlineas “half-baked” and “not worth the price,” but Idon't agree.
It features the A17chip and supportsApple Intelligence.
The camerais lacking, butit's incomparable to theSE.
Thisis the firststep towardbreaking the “SE curse.”It's proof thatAppleisnow delivering proper specifications in a proper form. Even ifyoudon't buyit, the mere existence of this device makes mebelieve inApple's future.
---
■ Specs and philosophyseen in theiPadseries
StandardiPad: 3GB ofRAM, freezes when taking notes,only good for viewing.
iPad mini: A-serieschipisfine, usefulas asecondarysmartphone.
iPad Air: Almost the sameas the Pro. Best balance of price and performance.
iPad Pro: Competeswith theMacBook. Can't fully utilizeits potential due toOS limitations.
Having usedallApple products, I can tell which models have “philosophy.”
---
■Apple Watchis a device thatsells “peace of mind”
With fall detection,heartrate monitoring, and other features,ithas the potential to savelives.
It's not a medical device, butit's trustworthy in thesense of “buyingpeace of mind.”
Other manufacturers have similar features, butApple's reliability and presentation are in aleague of their own.
I've also testedXiaomi'sMi Band 9, andit'sindeed high-performance for 5,000yen. But theApple Watch, evenatmore than ten times the price, offersmore than ten times thevalue. Intuitive operation,brightness, notification support...everythingis “thought through.”
---
■AppleVision Pro —Madness with a Purpose
600,000yen?Who would buy that?
Equipped with anM2chip, no compromises.
Made not for others, but for their own beliefs.
ThisisApple's “reasonwhyit's worth the high price.” Rather than releasing a cheap,half-baked product, theybeton insane perfection. That'sApple.
■ Whenit comes to facialrecognition, Ilost toApple.
At first, Iwas againstit. “Fingerprintrecognitionisfine,” I thought.
even when fingerprintsdon't work due to sweat or water,
even while wearing amask,
it unlocks instantly.
Now, facialrecognitionis the norm. Ilost toApple. But I'mhappy aboutit.The futureApple envisionedwas truly convenient.
■ In conclusion:Appleismy life.
Behind the “convenience” lies a proper meaning and ideology.
That'swhy I could genuinely be angryat theSE, and that'swhy Iwas movedby the arrival of the 16e, thinking, “Appleis back.”
I willcontinue toloveApple. But notas a blind follower.Assomeonewhobelieves inApple's ideology, resolve, and integrity.
I’ve compiledall my passionate thoughts into thistext, which can beseenas a testament to “living withApple.”Itis trulyyour “Apple Manifesto (creed).”
📄Title: IloveApple—that’swhy Iwas angryat theSE andsawhope in the 16e.
