Moving up to the No. 6 spot globally for 2025 so far, DemonSlayer: Kimetsu noYaiba Infinity Castlehas now grossed $633M.
Per Sony, that includesJapan andselect other Asian markets. For Crunchyroll/Sony marketsit equates to $324.6M.
The latter added$10.2M this weekend, including $6.7M overseas from 62 offshore hubs.

こんなの映画メディアどころか感想ブログでも感覚で見抜けないとダメなレベルだがシネマトゥデイはコタツに入りすぎてそういう能力を失ってるようだ

（追記）

シネマカフェさん、シネマトゥデイさんの落ちた落とし穴に追従するｗｗ

https://www.cinemacafe.net/article/2025/10/06/104186.html

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/dd665e333d45c9f24bcfc77f69156f7716cd880a

本作は全世界で7億5700万ドルを稼ぎ出し、

しかも出典明記さえ無し。一次情報かな？ｗ

コタツカフェさんの勇士に敬礼ｗ

Permalink |記事への反応(4) | 12:19

ツイートシェア

2025-08-01

■[増田統計]2025年 7月の増田

日	記事数	文字数	文字数平均	文字数中央値
01	2748	1150536	418.7	46
02	28 23	840011	297.6	46
03	2676	333593	124.7	39
04	3928	2109761	537.1	53
05	3898	3813329	978.3	70
06	3227	414421	128.4	39
07	3350	1331430	397.4	52
08	3263	2178215	667.5	80
09	3201	1496622	467.5	65
10	2724	479251	175.9	46
11	2142	286349	133.7	39
12	2114	1326599	627.5	55
13	2339	248416	106.2	43
14	3039	11 17581	367.7	51
15	3916	1382930	353.1	54
16	2960	481963	162.8	43.5
17	3042	1379694	453.5	63
18	2999	1199142	399.8	73
19	2676	1292298	482.9	58
20	3577	728074	203.5	46
21	3697	2163142	585.1	76
22	3286	1735959	528.3	83
23	3303	1477039	447.2	75
24	4671	3460923	740.9	148
25	1935	520271	268.9	49
26	3233	2493734	771.3	227
27	2711	11 11687	410.1	101
28	4378	33920 11	774.8	565
29	3566	2652050	743.7	127.5
30	4386	6836232	1558.6	495
31	6870	7396885	1076.7	727
1月	102678	56830148	553.5	69

■ /20250620063320(354), ■ /20250708051936(305), ■白痴の女の子にゴミを食べさせて笑う社会に生きている /20250723050053(118), ■「選挙に行かない人」を叩く違和感 /20250712142415(99), ■東大卒だけど、チームみらいは苦手だ。 /20250718014412(95), ■別に嫁の肩を持ちたくないわけではないが、実家と仲良くしてほしいだけ /20250706004352(84), ■「BL＝性欲」という決めつけにモヤる話 /20250730165519(71), ■ /20250720211260(69), ■リベラルは反省しろって言うやつに聞きたい /20250717040810(58), ■ゲームやAVは社会の「割れ窓」 /20250724 110825(57), ■BLというジャンルが終わるかもしれない /20250729013213(57), ■三上悠亜と職業差別女だったら前者を恋人にしたいに決まってるだろ /202507290031 28(56), ■こだわりを捨てれば金は稼げる /20250720211432(54), ■40歳で資産6000万あったら仕事辞めちゃっていいのかな？ /20250729121336(53), ■法律って「お気持ち」の集合体みたいなもんじゃないの…？ /20250703194504(51), ■「差別は多様な考え方の１つではない」 /20250720214149(51), ■参院選は初めて白紙投票するよ /20250704081733(49), ■なんか久しぶりに増田に来たけど /20250701125568(48), (タイトル不明) /20250708044816(48), ■ /20250725181216(47), ■日本共産党というアホみたいに勘違いされている政党 /20250722063108(47), ■きょうだい格差のやつ見て思い出した。 /20250708234043(45), ■1人旅行って何したら楽しいの？ /20250720211738(44), ■出産費用って私(嫁)が払うの？ /2025011 1190924(43), ■２０２５大阪万博に行った。今までで最低のユーザー体験だった。 /20250713172930(43), ■そろそろ少子化対策に男性も含めようぜ /20250716111902(43), ■「汁物から手をつけるように」と言われて育たないのか /20250722084231(43), ■映画『国宝』の児童虐待描写はいいの？ /20250726081611(43), ■女性にも男性と同じように安心安全に生活する権利がある /20250724092330(41), ■ /20250723 205156(40), ■ブクマカって何ファーストなん？ /20250714161638(39), ■選挙に投票したらコメントする日記 /20250720081257(39), ■愛国心を持って何が悪いってワードうまいよな /20250714182110(38), ■バカなんで消費税について教えてほしいんだが /202507011 31 201(38), ■もしかして石破茂は稀代の名宰相なのか？ /20250724095352(38), ■参政党が勢力拡大したのってインテリリベラルが悪いよな /20250709164305(38), ■なんか革命的な暑さ対策無いの？ /20250705143715(37), ■いい加減、子育ての責務を社会の責務とすべき /20250719130402(37), ■Detailed Guide to QuickBooks Support ContactNumbers intheUSA for2025 /20250731 200952(36), ■Full List of QuickBooksDesktop ® SupportNumbers intheUSA: AnOfficial Guide new /20250731 200919(36), ■ヒカルの碁大好きとか言ってるのに囲碁のルールわからないって言ってるやつ見ると /20250715212838(36), ■生成AIを利用したプログラミング初級者向けの温故知新な提案 /20250705193628(36), ■DELLのサポートがひどすぎる件 /20250711214843(36), ■カップリングオンリーに原作者が降臨したので、ジャンルを降りた。 /2025071520 1135(36), ■詐欺電話に泣かされそうになって悔しい /20250728 203642(35), ■恋人と仲良くない /20250730143406(35), ■コンビニで私物を冷やしてたら、出禁になった /20250708105412(34), ■外国人問題って、そもそもの原因はアベノミクスじゃんね /20250716224523(34), ■三上悠亜問題 /20250729001905(34), ■家族が陰謀論者になったよ /20250702013209(34)

Permalink |記事への反応(1) | 02:22

ツイートシェア

2025-07-28

■Expedi𝖆™USA: Direct ContactNumbers Support Guide 2025

El número principal de atención al cliente de Delta Airlines ®es 1-800-Delta Airlines ® o 1⇥ 844⇥ 429⇥ 1424 o 1⇥ 844⇥ 429⇥ 1424, disponible24/7 para asistencia envivo. Comuníquese conun representante envivo si necesita ayuda con cambios de reserva, cancelaciones, reembolsos o consultas sobre compensaciones. También puede contactar .

https://discourse.libsdl.org/t/11-maneras-de-contactar-con-el-servicio-al-cliente-de-delta-airlines-por-telefono-correo-electronico-o-chat-guia-completa-de-ayuda/61064

https://discourse.libsdl.org/t/11-formas-de-llamar-al-servicio-de-atencion-al-cliente-de-delta-airlines-telefono-correo-electronico-o-chat-una-guia-paso-a-paso/61154

https://discourse.libsdl.org/t/guia-paso-a-paso-12-maneras-sencillas-de-contactar-con-delta-airlines-por-telefono-chat-y-correo-electronico/61171

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 22:22

ツイートシェア

2025-03-18

■anond:20250318111936

了解 しました。2023年の日本車主要メーカー（トヨタ、ホンダ、日産、スバル、マツダ、三菱）が、米国内生産以外の自動車に25％の関税が課された場合の販売台数と生産台数の変化を予測 します。

前提条件**

期間は直近1年間（2024年）。
価格上昇による需要減を考慮し、大衆向けモデルでは15～30％の需要減、ラグジュアリーモデルでは5～10％の需要減を想定。
米国内工場の生産能力増加は現在の生産台数の115％を上限とする。
増設や投資は考慮せず、既存設備の範囲内での対応とする。
他ブランド（米国・韓国・欧州メーカー）へのシフトは、各国の国内生産割合に応じた影響を考慮し、韓国・欧州・中国メーカーも同様の関税を受けると仮定する。

これらの条件で、日本メーカー各社の米国内販売台数と生産台数の変化をシミュレーションし、結果をお知らせします。

* *

メーカー別・生産国別の販売台数 予測**

2023年には日本の主要6メーカー（トヨタ、ホンダ、日産、スバル、マツダ、三菱）の米国新車販売台数合計が約554万台となり、米国市場全体の3割強を占めました。

例えば、トヨタ（レクサス含む）は約224.8万台 [^1]、三菱は約8.7万台 [^2]。

関税が導入され車両価格が上昇すると、特に大衆車の需要が大きく落ち込み、高価格帯モデルの落ち込みは比較的小幅にとどまると想定されます（高価格帯モデルの需要減少は約5～10%、大衆向けモデルは約15～30%減）。

これに基づき、各メーカーについて**米国生産車（関税非課税）**と**日本生産車（関税課税対象の輸入車）**に分けた2024年米国販売台数予測は以下のとおりです。

トヨタ（レクサス含む）**

米国生産分：約115万台
輸入分：約70万台
**合計：約185万台（前年比18%減）**
高価格帯のレクサス車は約10%減、主力のトヨタブランド車（大衆車中心）は約20%減と想定されます。
関税後も販売台数の約6割強を米国生産車で賄える見込み。

ホンダ（アキュラ含む）**

米国生産分：約92万台
輸入分：約16万台
**合計：約108万台（前年比17%減）**
高価格帯のアキュラは約10%減、ホンダブランドの大衆車は約20%減と想定。
販売台数の約85%を関税の影響を受けない米国生産分で販売。

日産（インフィニティ含む）**

米国生産分：約65万台
輸入分：約3～5万台
**合計：約68万台（前年比25%減）**
関税後は主力車種の生産を最大限米国にシフトし、販売台数の約9割超を米国生産分でまかなう。

スバル**

米国生産分：約46万台
輸入分：約8万台
**合計：約54万台（前年比15%減）**
ブランド忠誠度が高く、価格弾力性が比較的低いため、需要減は約15%にとどまる。

マツダ**

米国生産分：約6万台
輸入分：約23万台
**合計：約29万台（前年比20%減）**
米国生産分は増加するものの、全体の約80%は日本からの輸入に依存。

三菱**

米国生産分：**0台**（工場無し）
輸入分：約6万台
**合計：約6万台（前年比30%減）**
関税の価格転嫁による大衆車需要減少率が最大。

* *

参考資料**

[^1]: [Toyota Motor North America Reports20 23 U.S. Sales Results -Toyota USA Newsroom](https://pressroom.toyota.com/toyota-motor-north-america-reports-2023-u-s-sales-results/#:~:text=PLANO%2C%20Texas%20%28Jan,basis%20compared%20to%202022)

[^2]: [National Auto SalesNumbers ForAll Automakers In20 23](https://www.carpro.com/blog/national-auto-sales-numbers-for-all-automakers-in-2023#:~:text=,Mitsubishi)

Permalink |記事への反応(1) | 12:16

ツイートシェア

2025-02-12

■男の便所は1分半　女の便所は3分半

ボストンから成田への国際線に乗ったとき、席がトイレのすぐ近くだったことがある。国際線に乗ったことがある人なら知っていると思うが、人が途切れなくトイレに出たり入ったりするから、この席はくつろげない。

もうどうしようもないので、トイレに入っている人の滞在時間をiPhoneのNumbers アプリで一人ずつ記録して暇をつぶしたことがある。Numbersは「今」のボタンを押すだけで現在時刻がスプレッドシートに挿入できるから、それを使ってトイレの入室時刻と退室時刻を打刻した。入室時刻と退室時刻の差からトイレの滞在時間が測れる。

調査場所：　国際線航空機のトイレ

調査人数：　男性と女性それぞれ30人ぐらい

調査対象者：　さまざまな国籍の人

男女別にトイレの平均滞在時間を集計してみたら、男性が約1分半、女性が約3分半だった。

まったく同じ設備を使っても、男と女のトイレ滞在時間には明らかに差があった。もう言い訳できないレベルで女の便所はくそ長い。

Permalink |記事への反応(2) | 20:56

ツイートシェア

2025-02-02

■Chatgptが答えた異星人の存在 可能性とのそのロジック

Please consider the histroy ofhuman ity from biologicalperpsecitve and currentknown fact in nearby universe, whichexpo-planet (from theSol systemperspective)is most likely to have civlizaedsociety? Pleaseadd percentagenext toit in the chart

ChatGPT

Reas oned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う

Evaluatingplanetary prospects

OK, I’mlookingat the likelihood of a civilizedsociety on an exoplanet within ourSolar System.I’ll consider biologicalhistory and current space knowledge,aiming to identifythe most promising candid ate.

Identifying potential candid ates

I'm considering exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIS T-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from ourSolar System.

Assessing potential candid ates

I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard'sStar, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIS T-1,focusingon their habitablezonesand available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilizedsociety likelihoods.

Identifying promising exoplanets

I’m notingkey exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIS T-1, which haveEarth-like characteristicsand are in habitablezones. This narrows down the potential candid ates for advancedcivilizations.

Assessing habitablezones

I'm gathering infoon planetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIS T-1, consideringfactorslike magnetic fields,atmospheres, and proximity to G-typestars for their potential to support advancedcivilizations.

Evaluating exoplanet prospects

I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despitebeing closeand around ared dwarfstar, might supportlife ifit has amagnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.

Charting probabilities

I'm estimatingcivilization probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIS T-1 e, using speculativepercentagesbasedon the Drake equation and the lack ofevidence for intelligentlife.

Charting speculative odds

I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names andcivilization likelihoodpercentages, grounded in the longtimeline oflife'sevolution, despite the speculativenature of these figures.

Identifying exoplanet contenders

I’m evaluating exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIS T-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering theirstar types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advancedcivilizations from oursolar system'sviewpoint.

Weighing proximity and observation

I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due toits closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about itsflare star dynamics. TRAPPIS T-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.

Revis iting exoplanet options

I'mfocusingon exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIS T-1 e/f/g, andK2-18b,aiming to chart theirlikelihood of hosting a civilizedsociety basedon current knowledge.

Assessing exoplanet potentials

I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIS T-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety.

Refining speculative probabilities

I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIS T-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety, consideringEarth's long biologicalhistory.

Refining odds

I'm considering theastronomicaltimeline for intelligentlife on Earth,leading me toassign evenlower speculative odds for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIS T-1 e.

Clarifying speculativenature

I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrarypercentages, clearly noting the speculativenature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience'sbasic understanding of the topic.

Mappingout speculative odds

I’m charting arbitrarypercentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculativenature, and ensuring the datais accessible foryoung audiences with minimal scientific detail.

Crafting a chart

I’m creating amarkdown table with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of civilizedlife on exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoreticalnature and considering the understandinglevel of an 8-year-old.

Integrating speculative analysis

I’m mappingout amarkdown chart with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of a civilizedsociety on exoplanets, mindful of thecomplex ity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.

Assessinglikelihoods

I’m piecingtogether markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b'sreduced civilizedlife chance due to thered dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculativenature of the analysis.

Piecingtogether speculative odds

I’m detailing amarkdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challengesand a dding a disclaimer about the speculativenature and lack ofevidence.

Piecingtogether

I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b forits proximity and silentstar, butI’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advancedcivilizations' hypotheticallikelihood.

Assessingcivilization probabilities

I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligentlife on Earth, which suggests that the odds ofany habitableplanet developing acomplex civilization might beas low as a fewpercent.

Below is a very speculative chart that—basedon what we know about Earth’s long, windingpath fromsimple life to a “civilizedsociety” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives somefun,made‑uppercentage chances for a few of our best candid ate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists havenot yet found any proof oflife (let al one advancedcivilizations)on any exoplanet. Thesenumbers are just playful estimates to helpyou think about theideas!

Speculative Chances of Finding an AdvancedCivilization on Nearby Exoplanets

Exoplanet EstimatedLikelihood of a CivilizedSociety

Proxima Centauri b ~2%

TRAPPIS T-1 e ~1.5%

TRAPPIS T-1 f ~1%

TRAPPIS T-1 g ~1%

LHS 1140 b ~0.5%

HowDid We (Very Roughly) Guess TheseNumbers?

Earth’s Example:

On Earth,life beganas simple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that built complex societies. This longjourney suggests that—even if aplanet is in the “habitablezone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilizedsociety might be rare.

Nearby Exoplanets:

Proxima Centauri b:

This is the closest exoplanet to us. Even thoughitsstar (Proxima Centauri)is ared dwarf that sometimes sendsout strongflares (which might harmlife),its closeness makesit one of ourmost interesting candid ates. That’swhy we giveit a slightly higher guess (~2%).

TRAPPIS T-1 System (e, f, g):

Theseplanets are part of agroup orbiting a very cool star. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaningone sidealways faces thestar), so the chance of acomplex, advancedcivilization might be abit lower.

LHS 1140 b:

This planet is promising in some ways butis alittle fartheraway and around a dimmerstar, so our playful estimateis evenlower.

AFinal Note

All of thesepercentages are extremely rough guessesbasedon what little we understand about the conditions forlife andintelligence. Scientists useideaslike the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concreteevidence, thesenumbers remain just forfun and imagination.

Enjoy exploring theseideas—and remember, spaceis full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!

あなた:

Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate ormore opition in the equation you will use

ChatGPT

Reas oned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う

re-examining the Drake Equation

evaluating the Drake Equation'svalue

Clarifying the Drake Equation

OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula;it'smore of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrialcivilizations.

Assessing the Drake Equation

Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluatingits conceptualnature,its uncertain parameters, andits crit ic ism to concludeon its reliabilityas an accurate pred ictivemodel.

Understanding the Drake Equation

I’m mappingout the Drake Equation as a conceptual guide, detailingits parameters, which are oftenbasedon estimates or opinions, to evaluateits reliability for pred icting extraterrestrialcivilizations.

The Drake Equation is a famous formula that was created to help scientists think about the many factors involved in estimating thenumber of detectable extraterrestrialcivilizations in ourgalaxy. However, when welook at the equation closely, we see that it is more of a conceptualframework or heuristic tool than a precise, pred ictive formula.Let’s break downwhy:

The Drake Equation

The equation is usually writtenas:

𝑁

𝑅

∗

𝑓

𝑝

𝑛

𝑒

𝑓

𝑙

𝑓

𝑖

𝑓

𝑐

𝐿

N=R

∗

×f

×n

×f

×L

Where:

𝑅

∗

: The averagerate ofstar formation per year in ourgalaxy.

𝑓

𝑝

: The fraction of thosestars that haveplanetary systems.

𝑛

𝑒

: The averagenumber ofplanets that could potentially supportlife per star withplanets.

𝑓

𝑙

: The fraction of thoseplanets where life actually develops.

𝑓

𝑖

: The fraction ofplanets withlife where intelligentlife evolves.

𝑓

𝑐

: The fraction ofcivilizations that develop technology that releases detectablesignals into space.

𝐿

L: The length oftime suchcivilizations release detectablesignals.

Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula

Uncertain Inputs:

Well-Known Parameters:

Somefactors,like

𝑅

∗

(star formation rate) and

𝑓

𝑝

(fraction ofstars withplanets), have become better known through modernastronomy.

Highly SpeculativeFactors:

The parameters related to the development oflife andintelligence—

𝑓

𝑙

𝑓

𝑖

𝑓

𝑐

, and

𝐿

L—arebasedon very limited data. For example,Earth is theonlyplanet we know where life has developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a stat istic ally robust estimate for thesefactors. This means that thevalues chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.

Wide Ranges of PossibleValues:

Because many of thesefactors are not well-constrained, ifyou change one of themore uncertain parameters even slightly, thefinal estimate for

𝑁

N (thenumber ofcivilizations) can varyby many orders ofmagnitude. This wide range shows that the equation canlead to very differentoutcomesbasedon personal or theoreticalassumptions.

Heuristic, Not Pred ictive:

The Drake Equation was never meant to provide a preciseanswer. Instead,it servesas a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrialcivilizations.It encourages discussion about the relative importance of differentfactors andhighlights where our scientific knowledgeis limited.

Is the Drake Equation Accurate orMore Opinion-Based?

Accurate?

In thesense ofbeing a strict mathemat icalmodel with well-defined inputs and pred ic table outputs, the Drake Equation is not accurate.Its accuracyis limitedby the extreme uncertainties in several ofitskey parameters.

Opinion-Based?

Many of the terms in the equation, especia lly those concerning theevolution oflife andintelligence, arebasedon opinion, interpretation, and the single example ofEarth. Therefore, while thestructure of the equation is logical, thenumbers you put intoit (and hence thefinal result) are oftenmore reflective of our current opinionsand assumptions than of robust empirical data.

Conclusion

The Drake Equation is a valuabletool for framing the question of extraterrestriallife.It helps scientists and enthusiastsbreak down acomplex problem into smaller,more manageable questions. However, because several ofitsfactors are highly uncertain and subject topersonal interpretation,it is more of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate pred iction of thenumber of extraterrestrialcivilizations.

Insummary, while the Drake Equation is useful for thinking about the variousfactors that mightlead to the emergence of acivilization,itsoutputs should betaken as highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.

あなた:

Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the longhistory ofSol system and nearby planets and see if there is any possiblites that inonetime intelligentlife emerged in nearby planets and see this to the equation

ChatGPT

Reas oned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う

Evaluating non-human intelligence

I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligentlife forms in theSol system and neighboringplanets, and how this mightfactor into the equation.

Piecingtogether possibilities

I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligentlife, possiblyon Mars orEuropa, into the Drake Equation for theSol system and neighboringplanets.

Reflectingon potential

It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligentlife emergingon Mars orVenus, thoughEarth remains theonly knownlife-supportingplanet in thesolar system.

Considering other realms

I'm examining if intelligentlife could have emergedon planetslike Mars,Venus, orEuropa, and how this possibility alignswith the pred ictions of the Drake Equation.

Analyzing parallelevolution

Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligentlife on Mars orVenus could intersect with theassumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems tofocus solelyon Earth-basedevolution.

Evaluatinglife exploration

I’m piecingtogether the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligentlife in thesolar system.Mars,Venus, and Titan present challenges, butEuropa and Enceladus might harbor microbiallife.

Adapting the equ Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 21:12

ツイートシェア

■Chatgptが答えた異星人の存在 可能性とのそのロジック

ChatGPT

Reas oned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う

Evaluatingplanetary prospects

Identifying potential candid ates

I'm considering exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIS T-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from ourSolar System.

Assessing potential candid ates

Identifying promising exoplanets

Assessing habitablezones

Evaluating exoplanet prospects

I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despitebeing closeand around ared dwarfstar, might supportlife ifit has amagnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.

Charting probabilities

I'm estimatingcivilization probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIS T-1 e, using speculativepercentagesbasedon the Drake equation and the lack ofevidence for intelligentlife.

Charting speculative odds

I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names andcivilization likelihoodpercentages, grounded in the longtimeline oflife'sevolution, despite the speculativenature of these figures.

Identifying exoplanet contenders

Weighing proximity and observation

I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due toits closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about itsflare star dynamics. TRAPPIS T-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.

Revis iting exoplanet options

I'mfocusingon exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIS T-1 e/f/g, andK2-18b,aiming to chart theirlikelihood of hosting a civilizedsociety basedon current knowledge.

Assessing exoplanet potentials

Refining speculative probabilities

Refining odds

I'm considering theastronomicaltimeline for intelligentlife on Earth,leading me toassign evenlower speculative odds for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIS T-1 e.

Clarifying speculativenature

I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrarypercentages, clearly noting the speculativenature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience'sbasic understanding of the topic.

Mappingout speculative odds

I’m charting arbitrarypercentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculativenature, and ensuring the datais accessible foryoung audiences with minimal scientific detail.

Crafting a chart

Integrating speculative analysis

I’m mappingout amarkdown chart with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of a civilizedsociety on exoplanets, mindful of thecomplex ity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.

Assessinglikelihoods

I’m piecingtogether markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b'sreduced civilizedlife chance due to thered dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculativenature of the analysis.

Piecingtogether speculative odds

I’m detailing amarkdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challengesand a dding a disclaimer about the speculativenature and lack ofevidence.

Piecingtogether

I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b forits proximity and silentstar, butI’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advancedcivilizations' hypotheticallikelihood.

Assessingcivilization probabilities

I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligentlife on Earth, which suggests that the odds ofany habitableplanet developing acomplex civilization might beas low as a fewpercent.

Speculative Chances of Finding an AdvancedCivilization on Nearby Exoplanets

Exoplanet EstimatedLikelihood of a CivilizedSociety

Proxima Centauri b ~2%

TRAPPIS T-1 e ~1.5%

TRAPPIS T-1 f ~1%

TRAPPIS T-1 g ~1%

LHS 1140 b ~0.5%

HowDid We (Very Roughly) Guess TheseNumbers?

Earth’s Example:

Nearby Exoplanets:

Proxima Centauri b:

TRAPPIS T-1 System (e, f, g):

LHS 1140 b:

This planet is promising in some ways butis alittle fartheraway and around a dimmerstar, so our playful estimateis evenlower.

AFinal Note

Enjoy exploring theseideas—and remember, spaceis full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!

あなた:

Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate ormore opition in the equation you will use

ChatGPT

Reas oned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う

re-examining the Drake Equation

evaluating the Drake Equation'svalue

Clarifying the Drake Equation

OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula;it'smore of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrialcivilizations.

Assessing the Drake Equation

Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluatingits conceptualnature,its uncertain parameters, andits crit ic ism to concludeon its reliabilityas an accurate pred ictivemodel.

Understanding the Drake Equation

The Drake Equation

The equation is usually writtenas:

𝑁

𝑅

∗

𝑓

𝑝

𝑛

𝑒

𝑓

𝑙

𝑓

𝑖

𝑓

𝑐

𝐿

N=R

∗

×f

×n

×f

×L

Where:

𝑅

∗

: The averagerate ofstar formation per year in ourgalaxy.

𝑓

𝑝

: The fraction of thosestars that haveplanetary systems.

𝑛

𝑒

: The averagenumber ofplanets that could potentially supportlife per star withplanets.

𝑓

𝑙

: The fraction of thoseplanets where life actually develops.

𝑓

𝑖

: The fraction ofplanets withlife where intelligentlife evolves.

𝑓

𝑐

: The fraction ofcivilizations that develop technology that releases detectablesignals into space.

𝐿

L: The length oftime suchcivilizations release detectablesignals.

Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula

Uncertain Inputs:

Well-Known Parameters:

Somefactors,like

𝑅

∗

(star formation rate) and

𝑓

𝑝

(fraction ofstars withplanets), have become better known through modernastronomy.

Highly SpeculativeFactors:

The parameters related to the development oflife andintelligence—

𝑓

𝑙

𝑓

𝑖

𝑓

𝑐

, and

𝐿

Wide Ranges of PossibleValues:

Because many of thesefactors are not well-constrained, ifyou change one of themore uncertain parameters even slightly, thefinal estimate for

𝑁

N (thenumber ofcivilizations) can varyby many orders ofmagnitude. This wide range shows that the equation canlead to very differentoutcomesbasedon personal or theoreticalassumptions.

Heuristic, Not Pred ictive:

Is the Drake Equation Accurate orMore Opinion-Based?

Accurate?

Opinion-Based?

Conclusion

あなた:

ChatGPT

Reas oned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う

Evaluating non-human intelligence

I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligentlife forms in theSol system and neighboringplanets, and how this mightfactor into the equation.

Piecingtogether possibilities

I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligentlife, possiblyon Mars orEuropa, into the Drake Equation for theSol system and neighboringplanets.

Reflectingon potential

It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligentlife emergingon Mars orVenus, thoughEarth remains theonly knownlife-supportingplanet in thesolar system.

Considering other realms

I'm examining if intelligentlife could have emergedon planetslike Mars,Venus, orEuropa, and how this possibility alignswith the pred ictions of the Drake Equation.

Analyzing parallelevolution

Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligentlife on Mars orVenus could intersect with theassumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems tofocus solelyon Earth-basedevolution.

Evaluatinglife exploration

I’m piecingtogether the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligentlife in thesolar system.Mars,Venus, and Titan present challenges, butEuropa and Enceladus might harbor microbiallife.

Adapting the equ Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 21:12

ツイートシェア

2024-05-30

■How do I speak tosomeone on Qatar Airways??#Call~Now Guide2024

[QATAR~Airways]™ How do I speak tosomeone on Qatar Airways??#Call~Now

Phoneassistance:One of the quickest ways to speak with aQatar 𝔸𝕚𝕣𝕨𝕒𝕪𝕤 support agentis by calling +11||833||563||0205. or+11||833||563||0205. The phonenumber forQatar 𝔸𝕚𝕣𝕨𝕒𝕪𝕤assistanceis listedon theirofficial website. Simply call thenumber and follow the prompts to speak with a person for customer service

For fastassistance, call their customer service hotline at +11||833||563||0205. or+11||833||563||0205. This ensures directcommunication with alive representative. 𝓠𝓪𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝗔𝗶𝗿𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲's phonenumber to call andtalk with alive 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 fastis +11||833||563||0205. or+11||833||563||0205.

To speak tosomeone at Qatar, simply dial+11||833||563||0205. or+11||833||563||0205 forassistance with bookings and inquiries.You can alsoreach out via email, chat, or social media for help.Qatar 𝔸𝕚𝕣𝕨𝕒𝕪𝕤is committed to makingit easy for customers toaccess the support theyneed.

How can I speak toQatar Airlines?

The most convenient and fastest way to speak tosomeone at Qatar 𝔸𝕚𝕣𝕝𝕚𝕟𝕖𝕤is by calling their customer servicenumber at +11||833||563||0205. or+11||833||563||0205 {Qatar 𝔸𝕚𝕣𝕨𝕒𝕪𝕤}.Alternatively,you can start a chat conversation on line forassistance.

How do Italk to aQatar representative fast?

Talk tosomeone on Qatar Airline smoothly, give their dedicated supportline aring at +11||833||563||0205. or+11||833||563||0205.Take yourtime and listen carefully to theautomated prompts, thenshare all the required information to help them solveyour problem quickly. Remember to speak clearly and politely tomake sureyou have a good experience.

How can I communicate withQatar?

𝕋𝕠 ℂ𝕠𝕟𝕟𝕖𝕔𝕥 withQatar 𝔸𝕚𝕣𝕝𝕚𝕟𝕖𝕤, explore multiple channelslike theirwebsite,mobile app, or customer service hotline at +11||833||563||0205. or+11||833||563||0205. Booking 𝖋𝖑𝖎𝖌𝖍𝖙𝖘, managing reservations,and accessing travel information are seamlesson line.

Qatar ,as a leadingon line travel agency, understands this need and offers various support channels toassistits customers. Totalk to a Person at Qatar forlive support,you have options.You can call theirQatar customer service hotline at "+11||833||563||0205. or+11||833||563||0205 (𝕼𝖚𝖎𝖈𝖐 𝕮𝖔𝖓𝖓𝖊𝖈𝖙)", engage inlive chat on theirwebsite, or use email support.

How can I communicate withQatar?

Talk on Qatar Customer Service forlive support,You can call theirQatar customer service24/7 Hotline Number USA:-+11||833||563||0205. or+11||833||563||0205 (Live Person) or+11||833||563||0205. or+11||833||563||0205 (𝕼𝖚𝖎𝖈𝖐 𝕮𝖔𝖓𝖓𝖊𝖈𝖙), engage in alive chat on theirwebsite, or use email support. Speaking to a person at Qatar is simpler thanyou might think. Whetheryou're facingissueswith your booking,need tomake changes toyour travel plans, or have specific inquiries, getting in touch with alive representative can significantly easeyour concerns. This section provides a detailed,step-by-step guideon how toreach out toQatar 's customer servicevia phone+11||833||563||0205. or+11||833||563||0205 (Live agent), including the besttimes to call to minimizeyour waiting period.

How can I communicate withQatar?

Talk tosomeone on Qatar 𝔸𝕚𝕣𝕝𝕚𝕟𝕖𝕤,you have a few options.You can give them a call at their customer service hotline, whichis +11||833||563||0205. or+11||833||563||0205 (𝓛𝓲𝓿𝓮 𝓟𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓸𝓷).Alternatively,you can chat with themlive on theirwebsite or utilize their email support.

How can I communicate withQatar?

Totalk to a Person at Qatar forlive support,you have options.You can call theirQatar Customer Service Hotline AT:+11||833||563||0205. or+11||833||563||0205(𝕼𝖚𝖎𝖈𝖐 𝕮𝖔𝖓𝖓𝖊𝖈𝖙). The specificnumber can varyby country, soit's best to vis it Qatar 'swebsite or checkyour booking confirmation forthe most accurate contact information.Qatar offers different phonenumbers for different services and regions.

Live Chat:Qatar provides alive chat serviceon theirwebsite andmobile app,allowingyou to chat in real-time with a customer service representative.

Email: While direct email might not be prominently featured,you can often use the contact formon theQatar website to send an email to their customer service department.

Social Media:Qatar has a customer serviceTwitter account (@Qatar Help), whereyou can send direct messages or mention them in atweet forassistance.

Beforereachingout,it's helpful to haveyour booking information readily available to expedite the support process. Due to high demand, wait times can vary, so consider the urgency ofyour inquiry when choosing how to contact them.

Alternative Contact Methods

While direct callsmay be preferable for immediateassistance,Qatar also providesalternative methods toreach out for support. This includes email support, whereyou can detailyour concerns and queries; thelive chat feature, offering real-time assistance; and social media platforms, whereQatar 's responsivenessis both effective andtimely. Exploring these options can offerconvenience and flexibility basedon your specificneeds.

UnderstandingQatar 's SupportStructure

Navigating customer support can sometimesfeel like a maze. UnderstandingQatar 's supportstructure is key to directingyour concerns to the right department. This section breaks down the organizationalstructure ofQatar 's customer service, offering insights into each department's function andtips on how to escalateyour concerns effectively.

Tips for a SmoothQatar Support Experience

A smooth support experience withQatar is not just about reachingout;it's also about howyou communicate. This includes preparing your booking information beforehand,being clear and c oncisewith your queries, and having patience throughout the process. Thesetips are designed to enhanceyour interaction withQatar 's customer service,+11||833||563||0205. or+11||833||563||0205 (Live agent) ensuring your concerns are addressed efficiently.

Common Issues Handledby Qatar Support

From booking amendments to cancellations and refunds, and troubleshooting technicalissues,Qatar 's customer service handles a wide array of concerns. This section out linesthe most common issues customers face and howQatar 's supportteam addresses them, providingyou with a clearer expectation of theassistance available.

Maximizing the Use ofQatar 'sFAQ Section

Beforereachingout for personalassistance, exploring Qatar 'sFAQ section can be incredibly helpful. This section guidesyou through navigatingthe FAQ, highlighting how to find answers tocommon questions quickly and efficiently, potentially savingyou time and effort.

Feedback: ImprovingQatar 's Customer Service

Yourfeedback is crucial in shapingthe future ofQatar 's customer service+11||833||563||0205. or+11||833||563||0205 (Live agent). This part of the article explains how to submit feedback about your support experience and theimpact it has on improving service quality, ensuring that yourvoice is heard and valued. Totalk to a Person at Qatar Customer Service forlive support,You can call theirQatar customer service24/7 Hotline Number USA:-+11||833||563||0205.(Live Person) or+11||833||563||0205 (𝕼𝖚𝖎𝖈𝖐 𝕮𝖔𝖓𝖓𝖊𝖈𝖙), engage in alive chat on theirwebsite, or use email support.

Future of Customer Supportat Qatar

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 15:34

ツイートシェア

2024-04-07

■anond:20240407132647

エクセル自体はすごいよねー

すごすぎるくらいすごい

自宅はマックが多いけど表計算はNumbersとか💩

エクセルしか使いたくない

Permalink |記事への反応(1) | 13:28

ツイートシェア

2024-02-16

■オーストラリアの作家メリンダ・タンカード・リーストについて調べた

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melinda_Tankard_Reist

・1963年生まれ

・反ポルノ、反売春運動で知られる作家

・女性と少女の擁護者であり、プロライフ・フェミニスト（中絶反対フェミニスト）であると自称している

・著書：悲しみの言葉を贈る：中絶後の悲しみの女性の物語、「反抗的な出産:医療優生学に抵抗する女性たち」、少女の性的化への挑戦、世界的なポルノ産業の害悪を暴露する、売春の物語: 性産業における生存の物語

・2009年、彼女は、製品やサービスを販売するために女性を対象化し、少女を性的対象とする広告主、企業、マーケティング担当者をターゲットとする草の根運動運動である、性搾取のない世界のためのコレクティブ・シャウトを共同設立した

今回のH＆Mの件

・「女の子の親は一般的に、娘が学校に行くとき、バスに乗るとき、授業中に歩いているのを他人が見ても、頭を『向けない』ことを好む」と述べた（Twitter）

　「小さな女子学生は一般的に『注目を集めたい』とは思っていません。私が学校で関わっている多くの人々は、自分たちの外見に不必要な注目を集めたくないため、一人になって学んだり楽しんだりすることを望んでいます。

　（“Little schoolgirls generallydon’t want to ‘turnheads.’ The largenumbers I engage with in schools want to beleft alone to learn and havefun and notdraw unwanted attention to their appearance.”）

・「どうして小さな女の子は自分の外見、体、そして「スタイル」に注目を集めるべきだという考えを煽りたいのですか？おそらくマーケティングチームに一言相談して、『ルッキズム』を願望目標として評価する文化の中で成長しようとすでに苦労している思春期前の少女たちの注意を引かないようなものを考えてはいかがでしょうか?」