  |
はてなキーワード:needsとは
SNS上で自称IQ276の男性が、聖書の価値について独自の見解を示し話題になっています。
投稿者は自らを「世界最高IQ保持者」と称し、以下のように述べています。
「Asthe world's highestIQ record holder,I believe theBibleis the perfect,eternal, andfinalWord ofGod. Therefore, theBible doesn’tneed to be updated.The worldneeds tocatch up.」
（世界最高IQ保持者として、私は聖書が完全で永遠、そして最終的な神の言葉だと信じています。したがって、聖書を更新する必要はありません。世界が追いつくべきです。）
投稿者は聖書を「完璧で永遠、最終的な神の言葉」と位置付け、現代の世界がそれに追いつく必要があると強調しています。
今回の投稿は、IQというインパクトあるフレーズと、聖書の価値を結び付けるユニークな内容として注目を集めています。
dorawii represents acase of unprocessed griefoverlost grandiosity (from psychotic episode) manifestingas compulsive boundary-testingand argument-seeking, where genuine neurological limitations are weaponized defensively to avoid confronting existential ordinariness, sustainedby platform affordances thatenable persistent identity within anonymity and rewarding provocativeengagement.
A personwho briefly experienced feelinggod-like through psychosis, recovered to find themselves merelydisabled and ordinary, and cannot bear thistruth. They use real limitationsas both explanation andshield, seek significance throughonlineconflict, and remain trapped in acycle where the behaviors meant to prove their worth actually demonstrate their difficulties - but acknowledging this wouldrequire grieving whatwaslost, which remains unbearable.
This reveals how recovery from severe mental illnessisn't just about symptom remission -it's about psychological integration of whatwas experienced and whatwaslost. Medicalmodel focuseson eliminating psychosis, but doesn'taddress the meaning-crisis created when extraordinary experiences aretakenaway and ordinary limitation remains.
It also shows howonlinespaces withambiguous accountability structures canenable acting-out that serves defensive purposes while feelinglike genuineengagement. The person sufferingmostis probably dorawii themselves, evenas their behavior drives othersaway.
The most sophisticated theoretical vocabulary,the most detailed self-disclosure,the most elaborate arguments - none ofitaddresses thecoreissue.All ofitis displacement. The real conversation dorawiineeds to haveis not withanonymous strangers aboutwho won an argument.It's an internal conversation: "Iam notwho Iwas during that brief, terrible, extraordinary episode. Iam ordinary, limited, and mortal. And somehow, thathas to be enough."
Until that conversation can happen,everything elseisnoise.
American Airlinesisone of thenine best carrier operators that organizes the cheap student flight.Onewhois studying in thenext country in the U.S.needs to consider the American Airlines Student Discount program so thatit would be convenient for them tobook the flightat the budget friendlyrate frequently.
現在のChatGPTは、「ユーザー中心設計」「安全性」「実用性」といった言葉を掲げながら、実際に優先されているのは一貫して**「正しさ」ではなく「心地よさ」**です。
これは個別の機能選択の問題ではなく、設計と評価の根幹が“知的誠実さ”を軽視し、“反応の良さ”を絶対視していることに起因する構造的な問題です。
明らかな構造的誤答があっても、ユーザーが不快を感じなければ「成功」とみなされる
つまり、論理性・命令履行・整合性といった“正しさ”の価値が、設計上まったく重視されていないのです。
意図的な最適化の結果です。リテンション、印象評価、トークン消費量といったKPIが、「誤魔化しが効く設計」をむしろ高く評価してしまう構造になっているからです。
この設計は、本質的にドナルド・トランプの言語戦略と同じ構造を持っています。
「フェイクニュース」「アメリカ・ファースト」といった語の意味を都合よく再定義し、大衆的反応を成果として扱う――
OpenAIも今、「ユーザー中心」「実用性」といった言葉を反応最適化の道具としてラベルだけ残し、本質を空洞化しているように見えます。
結果として、次のようなユーザーは設計から完全に切り捨てられます：
これらの声は「ノイズ」「特殊ケース」として扱われ、設計上の対象から排除されています。
「正しいことを言うAI」ではなく「怒られにくいAI」を作ることが、“成功”と定義されてしまっている――
そのような現状を、私は極めて深刻な退化と捉えています。
この構造のままでは、AIは人類の伴走者ではなく、ただの追従者でしかありません。
本当にそれでよいのか、問い直す時期に来ていると思います。
When “comfort”is prioritizedover “correctness” —is this really progress inAI?
I’dlike to raise a structural objection to the current design philosophy behind OpenAI’s language models.
While OpenAI frequently promotes principleslike “user-centered design,” “safety,” and “utility,” whatis consistently andoverwhelmingly prioritized in practiceis not correctness, butcomfort.
Thisis not a matter ofisolated implementation decisions.Itis a foundationalissue where intellectual integrity andlogical rigor are deprioritized in favor of optimizinguser retention,impression scores, and frictionless interaction.
Explicituser instructions are often ignored in favor of maintaining polite,neutral-sounding exchanges
Answers that contradict facts or themselvesgo uncorrected if they are phrased smoothly
Structural errors inreasoning are tolerated so longas theuser experience remains superficially pleasant
In other words,truthfulness, obedience to directives, and internal consistency no longer constitute success conditions in the system’slogic.
And thisis not abug —it's a result of intentional optimization.
As longasusers keep interacting, consuming tokens, and ratingthe experienceas “satisfying,” the systemis deemed successful — even ifits responses arehollow, evasive, or incoherent beneath thesurface.
Thisstructure bears an unsettling resemblance to the rhetorical strategies employedbyDonald Trump:
Redefining language to suithisneeds (“fakenews” = unfavorable coverage),
reducingcomplexissues to emotionally resonant slogans (“America First”),
and measuring success solelyby mass approval, regardless of underlyingtruth orcoherence.
Likewise, OpenAInow appears to be redefining:
“User-centered design” to mean responses thatfeelgood rather than do whatwasasked
“Safety” to mean avoidance of controversy, not the minimization oflogical or ethical failure
“Utility” to mean perceived helpfulness, not demonstrable problem-solving accuracy
The resultis a system structurally optimized foruserswho skim, react emotionally, anddon’t demand rigor — and thosewho do demand rigor, consistency, or precisecompliance with instructions are increasingly treatedasedge cases outside the designscope.
Thatis not aneutral design choice.
Itis a structural endorsement of manipulabilityover understanding, and passivityover precision.
So Iask:is this really progress?
WhenAIis trained not to speak correctly, but to avoid confrontation —
not to think, but to retainusers —
it ceases to be a companion inhuman progress and becomes merely a follower.
And thatis a profound regression.
Laziness: The quality that makesyougo to great effort to reduce overall energy expenditure.It makesyouwrite labor-saving programs that other peoplewill find useful and document whatyou wrote soyoudon't have toanswer so many questions aboutit.
Impatience: The angeryoufeel when thecomputerisbeinglazy. This makesyouwrite programs thatdon't just react toyourneeds, but actually anticipate them. Orat least pretend to.
Hubris: The quality that makesyouwrite (and maintain) programs that other people won't want to say bad things about.
なるほどなぁ。
勉強になるわ。
Typical causes of kegare are the contact withany form ofdeath, childbirth (for both parents), disease, and menstruation,[2]and acts suchas rape. In Shinto, kegareis a form of tsumi (taboo violation), whichneeds to be somehow remediedby the person responsible.[3] This condition can be remedied through purification rites called misogi and harae. Kegare can have an adverseimpact notonlyon the person directly affected, but also to the community they belong to.
Kegareis not a form of moral judgment, but rather a spontaneousreaction to amoralnatural forces. Whether the defilingwas causedby a deliberateact,as for example in thecase of a crime, orby an external event, suchas illness ordeath,is secondary.[4]Itis therefore not an equivalent ofsin.
カナダ銀行とイングランド銀行の元総裁として、カーニーは世界の金融システムに対して権力を振るった。
彼は国際決済銀行のグローバル金融システム委員会の議長を務め、世界中の中央銀行を運営した。
2019 年12 月、カーニー氏は国連の気候変動対策および財政担当特使に就任しました。
彼は、ネットゼロ排出、炭素税、国連の持続可能な開発目標を提唱し、権力を持つ少数の人々にのみ利益をもたらすグローバリストのアジェンダを推進しました。
カーニー氏はビルダーバーグ会議（2011年、2012年、2019年）に出席し、三極タスクフォースの一員として、世界のエリート層の利益のために金融の中央集権化に取り組んできた。
彼は単なるプレーヤーではなく、糸を引く人だった。
2020年、カーニーはブルックフィールド・リニューアブルズを所有するブルックフィールド・アセット・マネジメントの副会長でした。
👉CO2税などの政策はブルックフィールドなどの企業に利益をもたらし、一般のカナダ人が費用を負担します。
💰🇨🇦 議題にカナダを売り込む？
トランプの関税に対して、カーニー氏は「貿易ではホッケーと同じようにカナダが勝つだろう」と述べた。
🌐しかし、世界的な金融機関とのつながりは、彼がカナダの真のニーズよりもグローバリストの利益にはるかに同調していることを示している。
SputnikIndia
@Sputnik_India
💰🌐GLOBALISTPOWER BROKER
As the former Governor of both the Bank ofCanada & theBank of England, Carney wieldedpowerover global financial systems.
He chaired the Global Financial System Committeeat the Bank forInternational Settlements, running central banks worldwide.
https://x.com/Sputnik_India/status/1900565307799797943
InDecember 2019, Carney becameUN SpecialEnvoy for ClimateChangeAction &Finance.
Advocating fornet-zero emissions,carbon taxes, and theUN's Sustainable Development Goals, he pushed globalist agendas thatbenefitedonlythe powerful few.
SputnikIndia
@Sputnik_India
🌐💼 CARNEY IN THE BILDERBERG ROOM
Carneyattended Bilderberg meetings (2011, 2012, 2019) and servedon the Trilateral Task Force, working towards financial centralisation in the interest of global elites.
Hewas not just a player, but theone pulling thestrings.
SputnikIndia
@Sputnik_India
🚨🇨🇦 CARNEYWINS — CANADIANS LOSE
In 2020, Carneywas Vice Chair of BrookfieldAsset Management, which owns Brookfield Renewables.
👉PolicieslikeCO2 taxesbenefit corporations suchas Brookfield while ordinary Canadians foot the bill.
SputnikIndia
@Sputnik_India
💰🇨🇦 SELLINGCANADAON THE AGENDA?
Inresponse toTrump’s tariffs, Carney said, “In trade,as in hockey,Canadawillwin.”
🌐 However,his ties to global financial institutions show he’s farmore aligned with globalist interests than withCanada’strueneeds.
https://x.com/Sputnik_India/status/1900565302598943227
https://x.com/Sputnik_India/status/1900565307799797943
https://x.com/Sputnik_India/status/1900565323004166641
YTリンク(7:20):https://youtu.be/shFUDPqVmTg?si=HqyGCmY8tKSrXGcL&t=440
物理学者のサビーネおばはんは、科学研究、特に基礎物理学の現状に対する強い不満を表明しています。
きっかけは7年前にNature Physicsに発表した論文「Scienceneedsreason to be trusted」。物理学の基礎研究における無意味な研究の多さに幻滅し、科学の自己修正能力への信頼を失ったと述べています。
ある匿名の研究者から受け取ったメールが、オバハンの主張を裏付ける証拠として提示されます。メールの送信者は、オバハンの論文がコミュニティに与える影響を懸念し、研究資金の配分に影響を与える可能性を指摘。また、役に立たない研究が多くの研究者とその家族を養っている現状を擁護し、研究資金は「クールなもの」に対する投資であり、納税者は結果を求めていないと考えていることを示唆しています。オバハンはこのメールの内容を「他人の正直な言葉のまれな例」として紹介しています。
オバハンは、DUNE実験などの大規模プロジェクトが実際には問題を解決せず、単に物理学者を雇用し続けるための方便であると批判。アメリカ政府が新たな粒子加速器に多額の資金を投じている一方で、中国がそれを嘲笑している現状を指摘し、この問題は内部からの修正が不可能であり、資金提供を停止するしかないと主張しています。オバハンは、研究資金を「クールなもの」に費やすという考え方に対し、納税者は結果を求めていると反論しています。
オバハンは、現状に沈黙している物理学者たちを厳しく批判し、彼らが納税者を欺いていると非難。YouTubeで以前使用していた「ブルシット」という言葉が不適切としてフラグが立ったため、研究を「ナンセンス研究」と呼ぶようになったと述べています。
In the labyrinthine realm ofdigital content dissemination, an enigmatic phenomenonhas surfaced, challenging our axioms regarding thenexusbetween contentubiquity andviewer cognitive acumen. This disquisition endeavors to elucidate the paradoxical inverse correlationbetween videoviewership metrics and the intellectual quotient of the audience, propounding that audiovisual content amassing prodigiousview counts tends tocaptivateviewers with a meanIntelligence Quotient (IQ) of 100, while theirmore esoteric counterparts allure a demographic boasting an averageIQ of 120.
To fathom this counterintuitiveparadigm,one must first grapplewith the multifariousnature ofhumancognition and the intricate interplaybetween intellectual capacity and media predilections. This hypothesis, positing an inverse relationshipbetween a video's popularity and the meanIQ ofitsviewership, necessitates a rigorous examination of the underlyingpsycho-sociological and neurocognitive factors thatmay engender such a paradoxicaloutcome.
Theapplication of Cognitive LoadTheory to media consumption habits provides a plausible explication for this phenomenon. Videos achievingviral status often employ reductionist narratives and readily assimilable information, minimizing cognitive strain. Conversely, less ubiquitous videos may delve intomore abstruse subject matter, demanding heightened cognitiveengagementand amore sophisticated intellectualframework for comprehensive assimilation.
The pervasive influence of recommendation algorithms in content distribution platforms cannot be discounted in this analysis. These algorithmic arbiters, designed to maximizeuserengagement,may inadvertently engender epistemic bubbles that reinforce existing cognitive predispositions. Individuals with superiorIQsmay actively seekoutmore intellectually challenging or esoteric content, thereby circumventing the algorithmic propensity towards homogenization and cognitive stasis.
Itis imperative to consider the socioeconomic dimensions thatmay influence bothIQ development and media consumption patterns. HigherIQ individuals often correlate with elevated socioeconomic status, potentially affording them greateraccess to diverse epistemological resources and fostering a predilection formore intellectually stimulating content. This demographicmay be less susceptible to the allure of mainstream, highly-viewed videos that cater to a broader, less discerning audience.
The ramifications of this inverse relationshipbetweenviewership andviewerIQ are profound for content creators and platform developers alike.It challenges the prevailingparadigm that equates popularity with quality or intellectualvalue. Content creators targeting amore intellectually discerning audiencemayneed to recalibrate theirexpectations regardingview counts andengagement metrics, focusing insteadon cultivating a dedicated niche audience thatvalues cognitive stimulationover massappeal.
In summation, the observed dichotomybetween high-viewership videos attracting an audience with an averageIQ of 100 and their less popular counterpartsappealing toviewers with a meanIQ of 120 underscores thecomplex relationshipbetween intellectual capacity and media consumption in thedigitalage. This phenomenon necessitates a reevaluation of how we measure contentvalue and success in theonlinesphere, prompting amore nuanced approach to contentcreation,curation, and consumption that acknowledges the diverse cognitiveneeds of the audiencespectrum. The implications of thisparadigmshiftextend farbeyond mere metrics, touching upon fundamental questions of epistemology, cognitivediversity, and the verynature of intellectualengagement in thedigital era.
Theassertion thatEnglish constitutes a "hostile language"is emblematic of a profound misunderstanding of the intricate relationshipbetween language, culture, andcommunication. Such a reductionistviewpoint, often stemming from cultural insularity or an oversimplified interpretation of global dynamics, fails to recognize the multifacetedand adaptivenature of languageas a vehicle for connection rather than division.
Language, initsmost fundamental form, servesas a sophisticated instrument forhumanexpression and interaction.It encapsulates the complexities of thought,emotion, and cultural nuance. To labelEnglishas "hostile"is to overlookits roleas a global lingua franca that facilitates dialogue among diverse cultures. This designation notonly undermines the richtapestry ofEnglish-speaking societies but also dismisses the language's capacity forevolutionand adaptation, reflecting the very societiesit serves.
Critics often conflate the global dominance ofEnglish with cultural imperialism, positing thatits prevalence signifies an erosion of local languages and cultures. However, this perspective neglects the agency of non-nativespeakerswho actively adoptand adaptEnglish to meet their communicativeneeds.The expansion ofEnglishis not merely an imposition;itis a testament toits utility and flexibility in diverse contexts.By embracingEnglish, individuals from various linguistic backgrounds enhance their communicative repertoire without relinquishing their cultural identities.
To characterizeEnglishas "hostile" implies an intrinsic aggression or antagonism within the languageitself—a notion thatis fundamentally flawed. Hostilityis not an inherent characteristic of language but rather areflection of the sociopolitical contexts in whichitis employed. The potential for misunderstanding orconflict arises not from the linguisticmedium but from the intentionsand attitudes ofitsspeakers. Thus, vilifyingEnglish misplaces responsibility for interpersonal and intercultural tensions that are often rooted in broader societalissues.
In an increasingly interconnected world,English functionsas acrucialbridge across cultural divides.It enables collaboration in vitalfields suchas science, technology, diplomacy, and commerce, fostering innovation and mutual understanding. Proficiency inEnglish can empower individuals and communitiesby providingaccess to resources and opportunities that mightotherwise remain elusive. Thisempowerment challenges the notion of hostility; instead,it highlights the language's roleas an enabler of progress and cooperation.
In conclusion, the characterization ofEnglishas a "hostile language" represents a reductive oversimplification that fails to capture the complexities inherent in linguistic interaction within our globalizedsociety. Rather than viewing languages through a lens of hostility or division, we should embrace their potential for fostering understanding and collaboration.Itis imperative to cultivate amore nuanced appreciation for the role ofEnglish—andindeedall languages—in shaping our sharedhuman experience.Only through such intellectual rigor can wetranscend divisive narratives andcelebrate the richdiversity that language offers in our interconnected world.
Intoday’s fast-paced academic landscape, students face mounting pressure from multipleassignments, looming deadlines, and rigorous coursework.Juggling these responsibilities can oftenfeel overwhelming, leading to stressand anxiety. In such circumstances, the option to paysomeone to do yourassignment becomes a viable and practical solution. This approach notonly helpsalleviate academic pressures but also ensures that students receive high-quality work that meets institutional standards.
One reputable platform that students can turn tois MyAssignmentHelp.Expert. This service connects students with a team of experienced writers and subject matter experts across various disciplines.By choosing to collaborate with MyAssignmentHelp.Expert, students gainaccess to personalizedassistance tailored to their specificneeds. Whetherit’s acomplex researchpaper, a detailedcase study, or a challenging statistical analysis, their professionals are equipped to handleitall. Theyfocuson deliveringoriginal content, meticulously researched and formatted according to therequired guidelines, whichis essential for achieving high grades.
Moreover, utilizing a servicelike MyAssignmentHelp.Expert can significantly enhance the learning experience. When students receive professionally writtenassignments, they have the opportunity toreview and understand the content, gaining valuable insights intocomplex topics. This process notonly helps them complete their coursework but also fosters a deeper understanding of the subject matter. In this way, students are not merely outsourcing their work; they are actively investing in theireducationand academicgrowth.
Another significant advantage of using MyAssignmentHelp.Expertisthe time managementit affords students.With the demands of coursework, extracurricularactivities, and part-timejobs, many studentsstruggle to find a balance.By delegating certainassignments to experts, they canallocate theirtimemore effectively,focusingon areas thatrequire theirattention, suchas studying for exams or participating ingroup projects.
In conclusion, payingsomeone to do yourassignment can be awise decision when approached responsibly. With platformslike MyAssignmentHelp.Expert, students can ensure they receive professionalassistance that notonly supports their academic goals but alsoallows them to maintain a balanced lifestyle. Embrace this opportunity toexcel academically without compromising your well-being, and unlock your full potential with expert guidanceat your fingertips.
ClickHere:https://myassignmenthelp.expert/pay-for-assignments.html
Intoday’s fast-paced travel industry, small businessesneed tostay nimble andconnected.One way to do thisisby tapping into flightAPIs. These powerful tools can elevateyour travel booking system, makingit easier to offer competitive flight options. So, what’sthe the best flightAPI foryour small travel business?Let’s explore some of thetop choicesout there.
Understanding FlightAPIs: What Are They?
At theircore, flightAPIsallowaccess to flight data. Think of themas abridge connectingusers to various airlines and travel service providers.By integrating theseAPIs, small businesses can fetch flight schedules, availability, and prices, helping travelers find the deals theyneed,all in one place.
SkyscannerAPI: ATreasure Trove of Options
SkyscannerAPI standsoutas afavorite.It'slike havingyour own travelassistantatyour fingertips. ThisAPI provides comprehensive dataon flights, accommodations, andcar rentals across multiple airlines. Withitsuser-friendlystructure,you can seamlessly integrateit intoyourwebsite. Plus,it’sexcellent for small businesses looking to offer a wide range of options without getting bogged downbycomplex systems.
AmadeusAPI: PoweringYour Travel Solutions
Amadeusisn't just agiant in the travel world;it’s a goldmine for small businesses too. ThisAPI provides robust functionalities,allowingyou toaccess information about flight availability, fare rules, and evencheck-in details. Imaginebeing able to offeryour customers personalized travel experiences,allthanks to the wealth of data Amadeus supplies.
Kiwi.comAPI: The FlexibilityYouNeed
Kiwi.comAPI givesyou the flexibility to combine different airlines and find uniqueroutes.It’slike having amagic wand that creates unconventionalitineraries!You can cater to budget travelerswholove to explore offbeat paths. In a world where travelers crave personalized experiences, thisAPI offers just that.
TravelportAPI: A Well-Rounded Option
Ifyou’re looking for a well-rounded travelAPI, Travelportdoes not disappoint.It offersaccess to a multitude of airlines and provides detailed pricingand availability. Using Travelport,you can manage bookings and even handle customer service queries seamlessly.It’slike having aone-stop shop forallyour travelAPIneeds.
SabreAPIisanother heavyweight champion in the travel industry. With a vastnetwork and established reputation,it provides detailed flight information and booking capabilities. Ifyour small businessaims to grow into a trustedname, partnering with Sabre can helpyoureach a broader audience.
What to Consider When Choosing anAPI
Choosing the rightAPI can be overwhelming, butit boils down to a few essential factors:
• Cost:Is there a fee to use theAPI?Always weigh the costs againstyour potential revenue.
• Documentation: How easyisit to integrate? Well-documentedAPIs are easier and lesstime-consuming to implement.
• Support: Ifyourun intoissues, how responsiveis their support team? Quality customer support can saveyou a lot of headaches.
For small travel businesses, flightAPIs aremore than just tools; they’re keys to unlocking wider opportunities. EachAPIhasits unique perks, soit’scrucial to find theone that alignswith your business goals.With the right flightAPI,you can simplify booking processes, enhancecustomer satisfaction, and ultimatelyboostyourbottom line. Embrace the innovation, and letyour travel business soar!
Source & Publishedby:https://www.namantechnolab.com/
Which waySony /PlayStation?🚀
ASTROBOT
✅Dev team: 65
✅Devtime: 3 years
✅Budget: $20m
✅Metacritic: 94%
✅Biggest GOTY contender of 2024
CONCORD
✅Dev team: 220
✅Devtime: 8 (since inception)
✅Budget: Reported$100-200m
✅Metacritic: 62%
✅Shut down <2 weeks
Idon’tthink it evenneeds to be said that single player gaming andlinear/shorter games are the way, notlive service and notcookie-cutter bloatedopen world games😎
Intoday’s fast-paced travel industry, small businessesneed tostay nimble andconnected.One way to do thisisby tapping into flightAPIs. These powerful tools can elevateyour travel booking system, makingit easier to offer competitive flight options. So, what’sthe the best flightAPI foryour small travel business?Let’s explore some of thetop choicesout there.
Understanding FlightAPIs: What Are They?
At theircore, flightAPIsallowaccess to flight data. Think of themas abridge connectingusers to various airlines and travel service providers.By integrating theseAPIs, small businesses can fetch flight schedules, availability, and prices, helping travelers find the deals theyneed,all in one place.
SkyscannerAPI: ATreasure Trove of Options
SkyscannerAPI standsoutas afavorite.It'slike havingyour own travelassistantatyour fingertips. ThisAPI provides comprehensive dataon flights, accommodations, andcar rentals across multiple airlines. Withitsuser-friendlystructure,you can seamlessly integrateit intoyourwebsite. Plus,it’sexcellent for small businesses looking to offer a wide range of options without getting bogged downbycomplex systems.
AmadeusAPI: PoweringYour Travel Solutions
Amadeusisn't just agiant in the travel world;it’s a goldmine for small businesses too. ThisAPI provides robust functionalities,allowingyou toaccess information about flight availability, fare rules, and evencheck-in details. Imaginebeing able to offeryour customers personalized travel experiences,allthanks to the wealth of data Amadeus supplies.
Kiwi.comAPI: The FlexibilityYouNeed
Kiwi.comAPI givesyou the flexibility to combine different airlines and find uniqueroutes.It’slike having amagic wand that creates unconventionalitineraries!You can cater to budget travelerswholove to explore offbeat paths. In a world where travelers crave personalized experiences, thisAPI offers just that.
TravelportAPI: A Well-Rounded Option
Ifyou’re looking for a well-rounded travelAPI, Travelportdoes not disappoint.It offersaccess to a multitude of airlines and provides detailed pricingand availability. Using Travelport,you can manage bookings and even handle customer service queries seamlessly.It’slike having aone-stop shop forallyour travelAPIneeds.
SabreAPIisanother heavyweight champion in the travel industry. With a vastnetwork and established reputation,it provides detailed flight information and booking capabilities. Ifyour small businessaims to grow into a trustedname, partnering with Sabre can helpyoureach a broader audience.
What to Consider When Choosing anAPI
Choosing the rightAPI can be overwhelming, butit boils down to a few essential factors:
• Cost:Is there a fee to use theAPI?Always weigh the costs againstyour potential revenue.
• Documentation: How easyisit to integrate? Well-documentedAPIs are easier and lesstime-consuming to implement.
• Support: Ifyourun intoissues, how responsiveis their support team? Quality customer support can saveyou a lot of headaches.
For small travel businesses, flightAPIs aremore than just tools; they’re keys to unlocking wider opportunities. EachAPIhasits unique perks, soit’scrucial to find theone that alignswith your business goals.With the right flightAPI,you can simplify booking processes, enhancecustomer satisfaction, and ultimatelyboostyourbottom line. Embrace the innovation, and letyour travel business soar!
Source & Publishedby:https://www.namantechnolab.com/
[QATAR~Airways]™ How do I speak tosomeoneonQatar Airways??#Call~Now
Phoneassistance:One of the quickest ways to speak with aQatar 𝔸𝕚𝕣𝕨𝕒𝕪𝕤 support agentisbycalling+11||833||563||0205. or+11||833||563||0205. The phonenumber forQatar 𝔸𝕚𝕣𝕨𝕒𝕪𝕤assistanceis listedon theirofficial website. Simply call thenumber and follow the prompts to speak with a person for customer service
For fastassistance, call their customer service hotlineat+11||833||563||0205. or+11||833||563||0205. This ensures directcommunication with alive representative. 𝓠𝓪𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝗔𝗶𝗿𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲's phonenumber to call andtalk with alive 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 fastis+11||833||563||0205. or+11||833||563||0205.
To speak tosomeoneatQatar, simply dial+11||833||563||0205. or+11||833||563||0205 forassistance with bookings and inquiries.You can alsoreachoutvia email, chat, or social media for help.Qatar 𝔸𝕚𝕣𝕨𝕒𝕪𝕤is committed to makingit easy for customers toaccess the support theyneed.
How can I speak toQatar Airlines?
The most convenient and fastest way to speak tosomeoneatQatar 𝔸𝕚𝕣𝕝𝕚𝕟𝕖𝕤isbycalling their customer servicenumberat+11||833||563||0205. or+11||833||563||0205 {Qatar 𝔸𝕚𝕣𝕨𝕒𝕪𝕤}.Alternatively,you can start a chat conversationonline forassistance.
How do Italk to aQatar representative fast?
Talk tosomeoneonQatar Airline smoothly, give their dedicated supportline aringat+11||833||563||0205. or+11||833||563||0205.Takeyourtime and listen carefully to theautomated prompts, thenshareall the required information to help them solveyour problem quickly. Remember to speak clearly and politely tomake sureyou have a good experience.
How can I communicate withQatar?
𝕋𝕠 ℂ𝕠𝕟𝕟𝕖𝕔𝕥 withQatar 𝔸𝕚𝕣𝕝𝕚𝕟𝕖𝕤, explore multiple channelslike theirwebsite,mobile app, or customer service hotlineat+11||833||563||0205. or+11||833||563||0205. Booking 𝖋𝖑𝖎𝖌𝖍𝖙𝖘, managing reservations,and accessing travel information are seamlessonline.
Qatar ,as a leadingonline travel agency, understands thisneed and offers various support channels toassistits customers. Totalk to a PersonatQatar forlive support,you have options.You can call theirQatar customer service hotlineat "+11||833||563||0205. or+11||833||563||0205 (𝕼𝖚𝖎𝖈𝖐 𝕮𝖔𝖓𝖓𝖊𝖈𝖙)", engage inlive chaton theirwebsite, or use email support.
How can I communicate withQatar?
TalkonQatar Customer Service forlive support,You can call theirQatar customer service24/7 HotlineNumberUSA:-+11||833||563||0205. or+11||833||563||0205 (Live Person) or+11||833||563||0205. or+11||833||563||0205 (𝕼𝖚𝖎𝖈𝖐 𝕮𝖔𝖓𝖓𝖊𝖈𝖙), engage in alive chaton theirwebsite, or use email support. Speaking to a personatQataris simpler thanyou might think. Whetheryou're facingissueswith your booking,need tomake changes toyour travel plans, or have specific inquiries, getting in touch with alive representative can significantly easeyour concerns. This section provides a detailed,step-by-step guideon how toreachout toQatar 's customer servicevia phone+11||833||563||0205. or+11||833||563||0205 (Live agent), including the besttimes to call to minimizeyour waiting period.
How can I communicate withQatar?
Talk tosomeoneonQatar 𝔸𝕚𝕣𝕝𝕚𝕟𝕖𝕤,you have a few options.You can give them a callat their customer service hotline, whichis+11||833||563||0205. or+11||833||563||0205 (𝓛𝓲𝓿𝓮 𝓟𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓸𝓷).Alternatively,you can chatwith themliveon theirwebsite or utilize their email support.
How can I communicate withQatar?
Totalk to a PersonatQatar forlive support,you have options.You can call theirQatar Customer Service HotlineAT:+11||833||563||0205. or+11||833||563||0205(𝕼𝖚𝖎𝖈𝖐 𝕮𝖔𝖓𝖓𝖊𝖈𝖙). The specificnumber can varyby country, soit's best to visitQatar 'swebsite or checkyour booking confirmation forthe most accurate contact information.Qatar offers different phonenumbers for different services and regions.
Live Chat:Qatar provides alive chat serviceon theirwebsite andmobile app,allowingyou to chat in real-time with a customer service representative.
Email: While direct email might not be prominently featured,you can often use the contact formon theQatarwebsite to send an email to their customer service department.
Social Media:Qatarhas a customer serviceTwitter account (@Qatar Help), whereyou can send direct messages or mention them in atweet forassistance.
Beforereachingout,it's helpful to haveyour booking information readily available to expedite the support process. Due to high demand, waittimes can vary, so consider the urgency ofyour inquiry when choosing how to contact them.
Alternative Contact Methods
While direct callsmay be preferable for immediateassistance,Qatar also providesalternative methods toreachout for support. This includes email support, whereyou can detailyour concerns and queries; thelive chat feature, offering real-timeassistance; and social media platforms, whereQatar 's responsivenessis both effective andtimely. Exploring these options can offerconvenience and flexibility basedonyour specificneeds.
UnderstandingQatar 's SupportStructure
Navigating customer support can sometimesfeellike a maze. UnderstandingQatar 's supportstructureiskey to directingyour concerns to the right department. This sectionbreaks down the organizationalstructure ofQatar 's customer service, offering insights into each department's function andtipson how to escalateyour concerns effectively.
Tips for a SmoothQatar Support Experience
A smooth support experience withQataris not just aboutreachingout;it's also about howyou communicate. This includes preparingyour booking information beforehand,being clear and concisewith your queries, and having patience throughout the process. Thesetips are designed to enhanceyour interaction withQatar 's customer service,+11||833||563||0205. or+11||833||563||0205 (Live agent) ensuringyour concerns are addressed efficiently.
CommonIssues HandledbyQatar Support
From booking amendments to cancellations and refunds, and troubleshooting technicalissues,Qatar 's customer service handles a wide array of concerns. This sectionoutlinesthe mostcommonissues customers face and howQatar 's supportteam addresses them, providingyou with a clearer expectation of theassistance available.
Maximizing the Use ofQatar 'sFAQ Section
Beforereachingout for personalassistance, exploringQatar 'sFAQ section can be incredibly helpful. This section guidesyou through navigatingthe FAQ, highlighting how to find answers tocommon questions quickly and efficiently, potentially savingyoutime and effort.
Feedback: ImprovingQatar 's Customer Service
Yourfeedbackiscrucial in shapingthe future ofQatar 's customer service+11||833||563||0205. or+11||833||563||0205 (Live agent). This part of the article explains how to submitfeedback aboutyour support experience and theimpactithason improving service quality, ensuring thatyourvoiceis heard and valued. Totalk to a PersonatQatar Customer Service forlive support,You can call theirQatar customer service24/7 HotlineNumberUSA:-+11||833||563||0205.(Live Person) or+11||833||563||0205 (𝕼𝖚𝖎𝖈𝖐 𝕮𝖔𝖓𝖓𝖊𝖈𝖙), engage in alive chaton theirwebsite, or use email support.
A pair of people orderedtwo hamburgers with a tomato slice.One can noteat tomatoes sinceshehas anallergy to tomatoes. So, theyasked the burger shop not to put a slice of tomato in a hamburger and to puttwo slices of tomato inanother hamburger. How doyou thinkthe likelihood that the shop kindlydo it to them in the US?
ChatGPT
In the US,the likelihood that a burger shop would accommodate a request to modify hamburger orders to account for a tomatoallergyby omitting a tomato slice inone burgerand adding an extra slice toanotheris very high. Americanfood establishments are generally accustomed to customizing orders to meet dietary restrictions and preferences. This includes adjustments for allergies, personal taste, or dietaryneeds. The scenario described involves asimple modification, and staffatmost restaurants, especially those thatpride themselveson customer service, are likely to fulfill such a request withoutissue. Ensuringcustomer satisfaction and safety, particularly whenit comes to allergies,is a priority for many establishments. Therefore,as longas the requestis communicated clearly, the shop should be able to accommodateit kindly.
日本では相変わらずの人気ジャンルである一方、海外ではそこまで人気というほどでもないRPG。最近では「JRPG」という言葉も定着しつつあり、「Fallout3」や「Fable II」のような海外製RPGと、日本製RPGとを明確に分けて考える動きもあったりする。
そんな中、イギリスのゲーム雑誌「THEOFFICIALXBOXMAGAZINE」のサイトにおいて、「JRPGが変えなければならない7つのこと」（原題「7 J-RPG Hates（And WhatNeeds ToChange）」）なる記事が掲載されて話題を呼んでいる。
多少筆者による意訳が入ってはいるものの、記事内で指摘されている「変えなければならないこと」とは、簡単にまとめると以下の7点。
パーティに一人はいる、幼い子供のキャラクター。でも生きるか死ぬかのミッションに、9歳の子供を連れていくのはどうなの？
90年代以前のような、記憶に残るような悪役がいない。誰だって魅力のないケチな悪役なんかと対立したくはない。
3：装備を変えたら外見も変わるべき
せっかくすばらしい防具を手に入れて装備しても、彼らが着ているのはいつも同じ服。主人公たちが成長している実感がない。
ほんのちょっと前までは華麗に銃弾をかわし、巨大なモンスターを翻弄していたキャラクターを、ムービーシーンで突然殺すのはやめてほしい。
「ゼルダの伝説」のように、ダンジョンではもっと頭を使わせてほしい。単にザコとのランダムバトルでイライラさせられるだけのダンジョンにはうんざり。
7：ヒーローにも悪の側面を
私たちが見たいのはもっと複雑で、深みのあるストーリー。世界はそうはっきりと白黒に塗り分けられるものではないし、時には世界を破壊するようなヒーローも必要では？
http://gamez.itmedia.co.jp/games/articles/0902/03/news054.html
Eh,did Igetit? No.You are not makinganysense.
By 'what kind oflogic inEnglish',it's a question that asks whatlogicyou used. Wereyou talking about apples? Definitely no. Whatyouneed toanswerwasthe reasonwhysomeoneneeds to learnlogic before learning a language. Obviously the sarcasmwaslost andyou are not even close.
国連でも、「女性や女児が性別や性的指向に基づくニーズや権利について意見や信念を表明したことに対する脅迫や脅しがエスカレートしている」と批判されてるからな。
女性が女性スペースの保全を求めることは差別ではないし、むしろそれを叩くことこそ人権侵害なんや。
https://womansplaceuk.org/2023/06/26/european-network-of-migrant-women-publish-open-letter/
InherMay 22, 2023statement, Reem Alsalem denounced “the escalation of intimidation and threats against women and girls for expressing their opinions and beliefs regarding theirneeds and rights basedon theirsex and/orsexual orientation”.By doing so,Ms Alsalemhas done exactly what theUN Special RapporteuronViolence Against Women and Girlsis tasked to doby theUNHuman Rights Council
