  |
はてなキーワード:linkとは
javascript:(()=>{const%20loc=document.querySelector('link[rel="canonical"]')||location;const%20urlStr=(loc.href.startsWith('about:reader'))?decodeURIComponent(loc.href.slice(17)):loc.href;const%20url=new%20URL(urlStr);let%20s=url.search;s=(s.startsWith('?page=')||s.startsWith('?P='))?"":s;const%20w=window.open('https://b.hatena.ne.jp/entry?url='+encodeURIComponent(url.origin+url.pathname+s));w.document.close();})();
(function(){ if(!window.getSelection || !window.getSelection().containsNode) return; Array.from(document.links).forEach(link => { if(window.getSelection().containsNode(link,true) ===false) return; if(link.href.startsWith('mailto:')) return; if(link.href.startsWith('javascript:')) return; window.open(link.href); });})();tp-linkに関するリスクは自己責任だと思う。（https://www.tp-link.com/jp/press/news/21538/）
はてなでも調べた。
wifi関連のブクマで目立ったのが「tp-linkは避ける」って意見。
理由は簡単で、中国製かつ過去にユーザーの情報を無断で送信しまくっていたやらかしがあるからだ。
たしかにこれは避けたくなる…のだが、実際にtp-linkを避けると選択肢がかなり狭くなることに気づく。
tp-linkは世界中で売れまくっており、アメリカの家庭では7割以上がtp-linkを使っているという記事もあった。
アマゾンでルータを検索すると上位はtp-linkであり、同スペックで比べても値段が抜きんでて安い。
レビューもまったく悪くない、というか良い。
競合はというとバッキャ…バッファロー、エレコムなどやや頼りないラインナップ。
tp-linkがダメだとしたらどこのルータを買うべきなのだろうか。
おすすめとかある？
てか本当にだめなの？
B拠点のルーターまでは到達出来るけどNAS に行けない＆再起動抜き差しでたまに復活するなら、
LANケーブルの接触不良、HUB やNAS のポートの不調、機器の過熱や電源の不安定さの可能性がなんとなく高そうやね
～～～～～～ やるべきことはすでに確認済み／なんかよくわからなかった場合 ～～～～～～
あと、やっぱケチらんで、M365 のSharePoint か GoogleDrive を使った方がええと思うやで。社内のファイルサーバーとかの面倒を見んでええし
それから、もし無線LANに切替未なら無線LANに切り替えた方がええで。ユーザーに勝手に機器を生やされないし（予算があればだが）
更なる理想は、もし EntraID (AAD)＋Intune に以降がまだなら、この機会に移行して、無線LAN をSSO認証と組み合わせて、
Please consider the histroy ofhumanity from biologicalperpsecitve and currentknown fact in nearbyuniverse, whichexpo-planet (from theSol systemperspective)ismostlikely to have civlizaedsociety? Pleaseaddpercentagenext toit in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanetcivilizationlikelihoodを28 秒行う
OK, I’mlookingatthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon an exoplanet within ourSolar System.I’ll consider biologicalhistory and current space knowledge,aiming to identifythe most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from ourSolar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard'sStar, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1,focusingon their habitablezonesand available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilizedsocietylikelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m notingkey exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which haveEarth-like characteristicsand are in habitablezones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advancedcivilizations.
I'm gathering infoonplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, consideringfactorslikemagneticfields,atmospheres, and proximity to G-typestars for their potential to support advancedcivilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despitebeing closeand around ared dwarfstar, might supportlife ifithas amagneticfieldand atmosphere. This makes me think aboutits potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimatingcivilization probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculativepercentagesbasedon the Drake equation and the lack ofevidence for intelligentlife.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names andcivilizationlikelihoodpercentages, grounded in the longtimeline oflife'sevolution, despite the speculativenature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering theirstar types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advancedcivilizations from oursolar system'sviewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due toits closeness and observational potential, despite concerns aboutitsflarestar dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'mfocusingon exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, andK2-18b,aiming to chart theirlikelihood of hosting a civilizedsocietybasedon current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety, consideringEarth's long biologicalhistory.
Refining odds
I'm considering theastronomicaltimeline for intelligentlifeonEarth,leading me toassign evenlower speculative odds for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrarypercentages, clearly noting the speculativenature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience'sbasic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrarypercentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculativenature, and ensuring the datais accessible foryoung audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating amarkdowntable with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of civilizedlifeon exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoreticalnature and considering the understandinglevel of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mappingout amarkdown chart with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon exoplanets, mindful of thecomplexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecingtogethermarkdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b'sreduced civilizedlife chance due to thered dwarf's activity. This inclusionhighlights the speculativenature of the analysis.
Piecingtogether speculative odds
I’m detailing amarkdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanetlikelihoods, considering environmental challengesand adding a disclaimer about the speculativenature and lack ofevidence.
Piecingtogether
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b forits proximity and silentstar, butI’lladd a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advancedcivilizations' hypotheticallikelihood.
Assessingcivilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligentlifeonEarth, which suggests that the odds ofany habitableplanet developing acomplexcivilization might beaslowas a fewpercent.
Belowis a very speculative chart that—basedon what we know aboutEarth’s long, windingpath fromsimplelife to a “civilizedsociety” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives somefun,made‑uppercentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists havenot yetfoundany proof oflife (let alone advancedcivilizations)onany exoplanet. Thesenumbers are just playful estimates to helpyou think about theideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an AdvancedCivilizationon Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet EstimatedLikelihood of a CivilizedSociety
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
HowDid We (Very Roughly) Guess TheseNumbers?
Earth’s Example:
OnEarth,life beganassimple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that builtcomplex societies. This longjourney suggests that—even if aplanetis in the “habitablezone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilizedsociety might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
Thisis the closest exoplanet to us. Even thoughitsstar (Proxima Centauri)is ared dwarf that sometimes sendsout strongflares (which might harmlife),its closeness makesitone of ourmost interesting candidates. That’swhy we giveit a slightly higher guess (~2%).
Theseplanets are part of agroup orbiting a verycoolstar. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaningone sidealwaysfaces thestar), so the chance of acomplex, advancedcivilization might be abitlower.
LHS 1140 b:
Thisplanetis promising in some ways butis alittle fartherawayand around a dimmerstar, so our playful estimateis evenlower.
All of thesepercentages are extremely rough guessesbasedon whatlittle we understand about the conditions forlife andintelligence. Scientists useideaslike the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concreteevidence, thesenumbers remain just forfun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring theseideas—and remember, spaceis full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equationitself and see if this euqationis acculate ormore opition in the equationyouwill use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation'svalue
OK, let me see. The Drake Equationisn't a precise formula;it'smore of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluatingits conceptualnature,its uncertain parameters, andits criticism to concludeonits reliabilityas an accurate predictivemodel.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mappingout the Drake Equationas a conceptual guide, detailingits parameters, which are oftenbasedon estimates or opinions, to evaluateits reliability for predicting extraterrestrialcivilizations.
The Drake Equationis a famous formula thatwas created to help scientists think about the manyfactors involved in estimating thenumber of detectable extraterrestrialcivilizations in ourgalaxy. However, when welookat the equation closely, we see thatitismore of a conceptualframework or heuristictool than a precise, predictive formula.Let’sbreak downwhy:
The equationis usually writtenas:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The averagerate ofstar formationper year in ourgalaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of thosestars that haveplanetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The averagenumber ofplanets that could potentially supportlifeperstar withplanets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of thoseplanets wherelife actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction ofplanets withlife where intelligentlife evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction ofcivilizations that develop technology that releases detectablesignals into space.
𝐿
L: The length oftime suchcivilizations release detectablesignals.
Why the Drake EquationIsMore of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction ofstars withplanets), have become better known through modernastronomy.
The parameters related to the development oflife andintelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—arebasedon very limited data. For example,Earthis theonlyplanet we know wherelifehas developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for thesefactors. This means that thevalues chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of PossibleValues:
Because many of thesefactors are not well-constrained, ifyouchangeone of themore uncertain parameters even slightly, thefinal estimate for
𝑁
N (thenumber ofcivilizations) can varyby many orders ofmagnitude. This wide range shows that the equation canlead to very differentoutcomesbasedonpersonal or theoreticalassumptions.
The Drake Equationwas never meant to provide a preciseanswer. Instead,it servesas a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrialcivilizations.It encourages discussion about the relative importance of differentfactors andhighlights where our scientific knowledgeis limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate orMore Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In thesense ofbeing a strict mathematicalmodel with well-defined inputs and predictableoutputs, the Drake Equationis not accurate.Its accuracyis limitedbythe extreme uncertainties in several ofitskey parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning theevolution oflife andintelligence, arebasedon opinion, interpretation, and the single example ofEarth. Therefore, while thestructure of the equationis logical, thenumbersyou put intoit (and hence thefinal result) are oftenmore reflective of our current opinionsand assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equationis a valuabletool for framing the question of extraterrestriallife.It helps scientists and enthusiastsbreak down acomplex problem into smaller,more manageable questions. However, because several ofitsfactors are highly uncertain and subject topersonal interpretation,itismore of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of thenumber of extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Insummary, while the Drake Equationis useful for thinking about the variousfactors that mightlead to the emergence of acivilization,itsoutputs should betakenas highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the longhistory ofSol system and nearbyplanets and see if thereisany possiblites that inonetime intelligentlife emerged in nearbyplanets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-humanintelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-humanintelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligentlife forms in theSol system and neighboringplanets, and how this mightfactor into the equation.
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligentlife, possiblyonMars orEuropa, into the Drake Equation for theSol system and neighboringplanets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligentlife emergingonMars orVenus, thoughEarth remains theonly knownlife-supportingplanet in thesolar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligentlife could have emergedonplanetslikeMars,Venus, orEuropa, and how thispossibility alignswith the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligentlifeonMars orVenus could intersectwith theassumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems tofocussolelyonEarth-basedevolution.
I’m piecingtogether the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligentlife in thesolar system.Mars,Venus, and Titan present challenges, butEuropa and Enceladus might harbor microbiallife.
Please consider the histroy ofhumanity from biologicalperpsecitve and currentknown fact in nearbyuniverse, whichexpo-planet (from theSol systemperspective)ismostlikely to have civlizaedsociety? Pleaseaddpercentagenext toit in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanetcivilizationlikelihoodを28 秒行う
OK, I’mlookingatthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon an exoplanet within ourSolar System.I’ll consider biologicalhistory and current space knowledge,aiming to identifythe most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from ourSolar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard'sStar, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1,focusingon their habitablezonesand available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilizedsocietylikelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m notingkey exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which haveEarth-like characteristicsand are in habitablezones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advancedcivilizations.
I'm gathering infoonplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, consideringfactorslikemagneticfields,atmospheres, and proximity to G-typestars for their potential to support advancedcivilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despitebeing closeand around ared dwarfstar, might supportlife ifithas amagneticfieldand atmosphere. This makes me think aboutits potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimatingcivilization probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculativepercentagesbasedon the Drake equation and the lack ofevidence for intelligentlife.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names andcivilizationlikelihoodpercentages, grounded in the longtimeline oflife'sevolution, despite the speculativenature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering theirstar types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advancedcivilizations from oursolar system'sviewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due toits closeness and observational potential, despite concerns aboutitsflarestar dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'mfocusingon exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, andK2-18b,aiming to chart theirlikelihood of hosting a civilizedsocietybasedon current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety, consideringEarth's long biologicalhistory.
Refining odds
I'm considering theastronomicaltimeline for intelligentlifeonEarth,leading me toassign evenlower speculative odds for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrarypercentages, clearly noting the speculativenature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience'sbasic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrarypercentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculativenature, and ensuring the datais accessible foryoung audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating amarkdowntable with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of civilizedlifeon exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoreticalnature and considering the understandinglevel of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mappingout amarkdown chart with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon exoplanets, mindful of thecomplexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecingtogethermarkdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b'sreduced civilizedlife chance due to thered dwarf's activity. This inclusionhighlights the speculativenature of the analysis.
Piecingtogether speculative odds
I’m detailing amarkdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanetlikelihoods, considering environmental challengesand adding a disclaimer about the speculativenature and lack ofevidence.
Piecingtogether
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b forits proximity and silentstar, butI’lladd a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advancedcivilizations' hypotheticallikelihood.
Assessingcivilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligentlifeonEarth, which suggests that the odds ofany habitableplanet developing acomplexcivilization might beaslowas a fewpercent.
Belowis a very speculative chart that—basedon what we know aboutEarth’s long, windingpath fromsimplelife to a “civilizedsociety” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives somefun,made‑uppercentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists havenot yetfoundany proof oflife (let alone advancedcivilizations)onany exoplanet. Thesenumbers are just playful estimates to helpyou think about theideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an AdvancedCivilizationon Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet EstimatedLikelihood of a CivilizedSociety
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
HowDid We (Very Roughly) Guess TheseNumbers?
Earth’s Example:
OnEarth,life beganassimple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that builtcomplex societies. This longjourney suggests that—even if aplanetis in the “habitablezone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilizedsociety might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
Thisis the closest exoplanet to us. Even thoughitsstar (Proxima Centauri)is ared dwarf that sometimes sendsout strongflares (which might harmlife),its closeness makesitone of ourmost interesting candidates. That’swhy we giveit a slightly higher guess (~2%).
Theseplanets are part of agroup orbiting a verycoolstar. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaningone sidealwaysfaces thestar), so the chance of acomplex, advancedcivilization might be abitlower.
LHS 1140 b:
Thisplanetis promising in some ways butis alittle fartherawayand around a dimmerstar, so our playful estimateis evenlower.
All of thesepercentages are extremely rough guessesbasedon whatlittle we understand about the conditions forlife andintelligence. Scientists useideaslike the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concreteevidence, thesenumbers remain just forfun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring theseideas—and remember, spaceis full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equationitself and see if this euqationis acculate ormore opition in the equationyouwill use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation'svalue
OK, let me see. The Drake Equationisn't a precise formula;it'smore of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluatingits conceptualnature,its uncertain parameters, andits criticism to concludeonits reliabilityas an accurate predictivemodel.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mappingout the Drake Equationas a conceptual guide, detailingits parameters, which are oftenbasedon estimates or opinions, to evaluateits reliability for predicting extraterrestrialcivilizations.
The Drake Equationis a famous formula thatwas created to help scientists think about the manyfactors involved in estimating thenumber of detectable extraterrestrialcivilizations in ourgalaxy. However, when welookat the equation closely, we see thatitismore of a conceptualframework or heuristictool than a precise, predictive formula.Let’sbreak downwhy:
The equationis usually writtenas:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The averagerate ofstar formationper year in ourgalaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of thosestars that haveplanetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The averagenumber ofplanets that could potentially supportlifeperstar withplanets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of thoseplanets wherelife actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction ofplanets withlife where intelligentlife evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction ofcivilizations that develop technology that releases detectablesignals into space.
𝐿
L: The length oftime suchcivilizations release detectablesignals.
Why the Drake EquationIsMore of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction ofstars withplanets), have become better known through modernastronomy.
The parameters related to the development oflife andintelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—arebasedon very limited data. For example,Earthis theonlyplanet we know wherelifehas developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for thesefactors. This means that thevalues chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of PossibleValues:
Because many of thesefactors are not well-constrained, ifyouchangeone of themore uncertain parameters even slightly, thefinal estimate for
𝑁
N (thenumber ofcivilizations) can varyby many orders ofmagnitude. This wide range shows that the equation canlead to very differentoutcomesbasedonpersonal or theoreticalassumptions.
The Drake Equationwas never meant to provide a preciseanswer. Instead,it servesas a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrialcivilizations.It encourages discussion about the relative importance of differentfactors andhighlights where our scientific knowledgeis limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate orMore Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In thesense ofbeing a strict mathematicalmodel with well-defined inputs and predictableoutputs, the Drake Equationis not accurate.Its accuracyis limitedbythe extreme uncertainties in several ofitskey parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning theevolution oflife andintelligence, arebasedon opinion, interpretation, and the single example ofEarth. Therefore, while thestructure of the equationis logical, thenumbersyou put intoit (and hence thefinal result) are oftenmore reflective of our current opinionsand assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equationis a valuabletool for framing the question of extraterrestriallife.It helps scientists and enthusiastsbreak down acomplex problem into smaller,more manageable questions. However, because several ofitsfactors are highly uncertain and subject topersonal interpretation,itismore of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of thenumber of extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Insummary, while the Drake Equationis useful for thinking about the variousfactors that mightlead to the emergence of acivilization,itsoutputs should betakenas highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the longhistory ofSol system and nearbyplanets and see if thereisany possiblites that inonetime intelligentlife emerged in nearbyplanets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-humanintelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-humanintelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligentlife forms in theSol system and neighboringplanets, and how this mightfactor into the equation.
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligentlife, possiblyonMars orEuropa, into the Drake Equation for theSol system and neighboringplanets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligentlife emergingonMars orVenus, thoughEarth remains theonly knownlife-supportingplanet in thesolar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligentlife could have emergedonplanetslikeMars,Venus, orEuropa, and how thispossibility alignswith the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligentlifeonMars orVenus could intersectwith theassumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems tofocussolelyonEarth-basedevolution.
I’m piecingtogether the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligentlife in thesolar system.Mars,Venus, and Titan present challenges, butEuropa and Enceladus might harbor microbiallife.
こいつは初心者○しの戦法しか脳のない間抜けであることがわかる
--
[Event "Live Chess"]
[Site "Chess.com"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Guest8421978169"]
[Black "Guest0506922560"]
[Result "0-1"]
[TimeControl "600"]
[WhiteElo "400"]
[BlackElo "400"]
[Termination "Guest0506922560 が相手投了により勝ち"]
[Link "https://www.chess.com/game/122542809294"]
1. e4 e5 2. Qf3 Qe7 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. g4g5 5. Bf1c5 6. b3 Nc6 7.c3 b5 8. c4 bxc4
[Event "Live Chess"]
[Site "Chess.com"]
[Round "?"]
[Black "Guest8644580157"]
[Result "0-1"]
[TimeControl "600"]
[WhiteElo "400"]
[BlackElo "400"]
[Termination "Guest8644580157 がチェックメイトにより勝ち"]
[Link "https://www.chess.com/game/122522582062"]
1.f3 e5 2.f4 exf4 3. g3 fxg3 4. hxg3g5 5.e3 Nf6 6. Be2 d5 7. Kf2 Nc6 8. Kf3
jobs.generationshe.co/company/leaked-mms-nimra-mehra-viral-full-video-clip-download-link-social-media-twitter-66f7a6953dad/
jobs.generationshe.co/company/leaked-mms-isabela-moner-viral-full-video-clip-download-link-social-media-twitte-7fc021cfabbd/
jobs.generationshe.co/company/original-mms-divya-prabha-viral-full-video-leaked-clip-download-link-social-medi-d091b292f449/
jobs.generationshe.co/company/leaked-mms-kanwal-aftab-viral-full-video-clip-download-link-social-media-twitter-0ec58aa9dd87/
jobs.generationshe.co/company/leaked-mms-nimra-mehra-viral-full-video-clip-download-link-social-media-twitter-66f7a6953dad?Viral-MMS
jobs.generationshe.co/company/leaked-mms-isabela-moner-viral-full-video-clip-download-link-social-media-twitte-7fc021cfabbd?Viral-MMS
jobs.generationshe.co/company/original-mms-divya-prabha-viral-full-video-leaked-clip-download-link-social-medi-d091b292f449?Viral-MMS
jobs.generationshe.co/company/leaked-mms-kanwal-aftab-viral-full-video-clip-download-link-social-media-twitter-0ec58aa9dd87?Viral-MMS
jobs.generationshe.co/company/leaked-mms-nimra-mehra-viral-full-video-clip-download-link-social-media-twitter-66f7a6953dad/
jobs.generationshe.co/company/leaked-mms-isabela-moner-viral-full-video-clip-download-link-social-media-twitte-7fc021cfabbd/
jobs.generationshe.co/company/original-mms-divya-prabha-viral-full-video-leaked-clip-download-link-social-medi-d091b292f449/
jobs.generationshe.co/company/leaked-mms-kanwal-aftab-viral-full-video-clip-download-link-social-media-twitter-0ec58aa9dd87/
jobs.generationshe.co/company/leaked-mms-nimra-mehra-viral-full-video-clip-download-link-social-media-twitter-66f7a6953dad?Viral-MMS
jobs.generationshe.co/company/leaked-mms-isabela-moner-viral-full-video-clip-download-link-social-media-twitte-7fc021cfabbd?Viral-MMS
jobs.generationshe.co/company/original-mms-divya-prabha-viral-full-video-leaked-clip-download-link-social-medi-d091b292f449?Viral-MMS
jobs.generationshe.co/company/leaked-mms-kanwal-aftab-viral-full-video-clip-download-link-social-media-twitter-0ec58aa9dd87?Viral-MMS
bento.me/original-kanwal-aftab-full-video-viral-mms-leaked-link
bento.me/original-kanwal-aftab-full-video-viral-mms-leaked-link?TikToker-MMS
old.bitchute.com/video/bVKSmHTM118n/
old.bitchute.com/video/bVKSmHTM118n?Viral
old.bitchute.com/video/U3OqZVAoF9cI/
old.bitchute.com/video/U3OqZVAoF9cI?Leaked
jobs.generationshe.co/company/viral-mms-kanwal-aftab-viral-full-video-leaked-clip-link-social-media-twitter-x-3056b19ee478/
jobs.generationshe.co/company/viral-mms-kanwal-aftab-viral-full-video-leaked-clip-link-social-media-twitter-x-3056b19ee478?Leaked
jobs.generationshe.co/company/original-mms-kanwal-aftab-viral-full-video-leaked-clip-link-social-media-x-tikto-bdd397b5d801/
jobs.generationshe.co/company/original-mms-kanwal-aftab-viral-full-video-leaked-clip-link-social-media-x-tikto-bdd397b5d801?Viral
bento.me/original-kanwal-aftab-full-video-viral-mms-leaked-link
bento.me/original-kanwal-aftab-full-video-viral-mms-leaked-link?TikToker-MMS
old.bitchute.com/video/bVKSmHTM118n/
old.bitchute.com/video/bVKSmHTM118n?Viral
old.bitchute.com/video/U3OqZVAoF9cI/
old.bitchute.com/video/U3OqZVAoF9cI?Leaked
jobs.generationshe.co/company/viral-mms-kanwal-aftab-viral-full-video-leaked-clip-link-social-media-twitter-x-3056b19ee478/
jobs.generationshe.co/company/viral-mms-kanwal-aftab-viral-full-video-leaked-clip-link-social-media-twitter-x-3056b19ee478?Leaked
jobs.generationshe.co/company/original-mms-kanwal-aftab-viral-full-video-leaked-clip-link-social-media-x-tikto-bdd397b5d801/
jobs.generationshe.co/company/original-mms-kanwal-aftab-viral-full-video-leaked-clip-link-social-media-x-tikto-bdd397b5d801?Viral
old.bitchute.com/video/6mZn12bgjUbt/
old.bitchute.com/video/DNXfR2m7XGlX/
old.bitchute.com/video/kA8qUyLghJs8/
old.bitchute.com/video/LApwdFDnepL6/
old.bitchute.com/video/RNbga3y7gJKN/
old.bitchute.com/video/ofLGIwyjcUvk/
old.bitchute.com/video/476kfW25eRsv/
old.bitchute.com/video/NpV5VPNmYBDs/
old.bitchute.com/video/OZMvtF4uIRNf/
old.bitchute.com/video/3Ituv7TTDZ8h/
old.bitchute.com/video/SIB1CnwqSvDX/
old.bitchute.com/video/H5veU1t3LRhi/
old.bitchute.com/video/H2Q2QYc4xBj4/
old.bitchute.com/video/mdbdDLxhWW7D/
old.bitchute.com/video/4zZPv7FXSnMl/
old.bitchute.com/video/IBjbj1GR8tKn/
old.bitchute.com/video/IFZtLnqt8k7v/
old.bitchute.com/video/QyFKcIb55Xg0/
old.bitchute.com/video/nNXT5AK0gTn8/
old.bitchute.com/video/o57q0d3qbyPZ/
old.bitchute.com/video/ZCxyKKYcwaZ5/
The DemocratsNeed an Honest ConversationonGender Identity
ほとんどのアメリカ人は、トランスジェンダーの人々が住宅や雇用で差別に直面するべきではないことに同意しているが、トランス女性が女性のスポーツで競争することを許可することに対して、同じレベルの支持はない。
ハリスの敗北後、マサチューセッツ州の下院議員セス・モルトンは、自身の懸念を公にした。「私は二人の娘がいますが、男もしくは元男性のアスリートに競技場で彼女たちが負けることを望んでいません。でも、民主党員としてそんなことを言うのが怖いと思わなければならないんです」と彼は『タイムズ』に語った。非難の声はホワイトハウスにまで及び、ジョー・バイデンの支持者たちは、同僚のフランクリン・フォアに対して、現大統領ならトランプの広告に対してもっと積極的に反論し、「トランス女性が女性のスポーツに参加することに明確に反対していただろう」と述べた。
The DemocratsNeed an Honest ConversationonGender Identity
ほとんどのアメリカ人は、トランスジェンダーの人々が住宅や雇用で差別に直面するべきではないことに同意しているが、トランス女性が女性のスポーツで競争することを許可することに対して、同じレベルの支持はない。
ハリスの敗北後、マサチューセッツ州の下院議員セス・モルトンは、自身の懸念を公にした。「私は二人の娘がいますが、男もしくは元男性のアスリートに競技場で彼女たちが負けることを望んでいません。でも、民主党員としてそんなことを言うのが怖いと思わなければならないんです」と彼は『タイムズ』に語った。非難の声はホワイトハウスにまで及び、ジョー・バイデンの支持者たちは、同僚のフランクリン・フォアに対して、現大統領ならトランプの広告に対してもっと積極的に反論し、「トランス女性が女性のスポーツに参加することに明確に反対していただろう」と述べた。