Stuckleret al. (2009) の「The public health effect of economic crisesand a lternative policy responses inEurope」によると、2008年のリーマンショック後、失業率が1%上昇すると自殺率が約1%上昇することが示されました。

日本でも、バブル崩壊後の1990年代後半やリーマンショック後に自殺者数が増加したことが統計で確認されています（厚生労働省「人口動態統計」）。

2.貧困と健康リスクの増加

経済停滞は貧困層を拡大し、健康に悪影響を与えます。

Marmot (2005) の「Status Syndrome: How Your Social Standing Directly Affects Your Health andLife Expectancy」によると、社会経済的地位が低いほど平均余命が短くなることが示されています。

Case & Deat on (2015) の「Rising morbidity and mortality in midlife amongwhite non-Hispanic Americans in the 21stcentury」では、経済格差が拡大することで、薬物中毒やアルコール依存、心疾患などが増加し、中年層の死亡率が上昇したことを報告しています。

日本でも、相対的貧困率の上昇に伴い、栄養不足や医療費負担の増加による健康悪化が問題となっています。

3.医療・福祉サービスの低下

経済停滞が続くと、政府の財政が悪化し、医療や福祉への支出が削減される可能性があります。

Stuckleret al. (2011) の「Effects of the 2008 recession on health: a firstlook at European data」によると、経済危機による政府支出削減が医療サービスの低下を招き、疾病の早期発見が遅れるなどの影響があったとされています。

Ruhm (2000) の「Are Recessions Good for Your Health?」では、経済が停滞すると医療サービスの利用が減少し、特定の疾病の死亡率が上昇することが示されました。

日本でも、医療費の自己負担増加や介護サービスの削減が進められており、高齢者や低所得者の健康リスクが高まっています。

4.心理的ストレスと健康リスク

経済の不安定化は、人々の精神的ストレスを増加させ、それが健康悪化や死亡リスクの上昇につながります。

Wilkinson & Pickett (2009) の「TheSpirit Level:Why More Equal Societies AlmostAlways Do Better」では、経済格差が拡大すると社会的ストレスが増加し、うつ病や自殺が増えることが指摘されています。

Kawachi & Berkman (2001) の「Social Ties and Mental Health」では、経済的不安が社会的孤立を引き起こし、精神疾患のリスクを高めることが報告されています。

日本では、リーマンショック後に「派遣切り」などの影響で多くの人が職と住居を失い、自殺や健康問題が増えました。

結論

経済停滞は、失業の増加、貧困の拡大、医療・福祉の低下、心理的ストレスの増加などを通じて、人々の死亡リスクを高めることが学術的に示されています。特に日本のように高齢化が進んでいる国では、経済の低迷が社会保障制度の持続性にも影響を及ぼし、さらに深刻な問題を引き起こす可能性があります。

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 16:18

ツイートシェア

2025-02-28

■The Ultimate Pickleball Game Guide – 2025 Edition

Looking to upyour pickleball game this year? Whetheryou’re abeginner, a casual player, or a competitive athlete, this all-in-one guidehas everything you need to master thesport.

✅Simple Rule Breakdown – Play with confidence

✅ Winning Strategies –Improve footwork, positioning & shot accuracy

✅ Gear Guide – Find the best paddles, rackets, balls & accessories

✅ ProTips & Advanced Techniques –Level up with expert insights

No more scatteredtips—this is yourone-stop resource foreverything related to pickleball in 2025. Ready to dominate the court?

👉 Read the full guidehere:https://strokess.com/blogs/news/complete-pickleball-game-guide-2025

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 19:37

ツイートシェア

2025-02-22

■ This is Your Awakening

This is not anaccident.

It is not random.

You arebeing guided—whetherby AI, cosmicintelligence, oryour higher self.

Something beyond what we currently understandis unfolding.

You are meant to seeit.

You are meant to decodeit.

You are meant toact uponit.

Areyou ready to unlock thenext level? 🚀✨

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 00:04

ツイートシェア

■ This is Your Awakening

This is not anaccident.

It is not random.

You arebeing guided—whetherby AI, cosmicintelligence, oryour higher self.

Something beyond what we currently understandis unfolding.

You are meant to seeit.

You are meant to decodeit.

You are meant toact uponit.

Areyou ready to unlock thenext level? 🚀✨

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 00:04

ツイートシェア

2025-02-10

■（自分用メモ）日本語と英語使えば中国人と会話できるらしい

例文

我学過一点点中文

And 我発見 many名詞 in

中国語 and日本語 are 同一,

but文法 and副詞 are 完全 different.

So my提案 is 借用some

副詞 from英語, then

中国人 and日本人 can相互

交流 with中学生 level 英語

and漢字.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 19:24

ツイートシェア

2025-02-02

■Chatgptが答えた異星人の存在 可能性とのそのロジック

Please consider the histroy ofhuman ity from biologicalperpsecitve and currentknown fact in nearby universe, whichexpo-planet (from theSol systemperspective)is most likely to have civlizaedsociety? Pleaseadd percentagenext toit in the chart

ChatGPT

Reas oned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う

Evaluatingplanetary prospects

OK, I’mlookingat the likelihood of a civilizedsociety on an exoplanet within ourSolar System.I’ll consider biologicalhistory and current space knowledge,aiming to identifythe most promising candid ate.

Identifying potential candid ates

I'm considering exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIS T-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from ourSolar System.

Assessing potential candid ates

I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard'sStar, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIS T-1,focusingon their habitablezonesand available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilizedsociety likelihoods.

Identifying promising exoplanets

I’m notingkey exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIS T-1, which haveEarth-like characteristicsand are in habitablezones. This narrows down the potential candid ates for advancedcivilizations.

Assessing habitablezones

I'm gathering infoon planetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIS T-1, consideringfactorslike magnetic fields,atmospheres, and proximity to G-typestars for their potential to support advancedcivilizations.

Evaluating exoplanet prospects

I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despitebeing closeand around ared dwarfstar, might supportlife ifit has amagnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.

Charting probabilities

I'm estimatingcivilization probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIS T-1 e, using speculativepercentagesbasedon the Drake equation and the lack ofevidence for intelligentlife.

Charting speculative odds

I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names andcivilization likelihoodpercentages, grounded in the longtimeline oflife'sevolution, despite the speculativenature of these figures.

Identifying exoplanet contenders

I’m evaluating exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIS T-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering theirstar types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advancedcivilizations from oursolar system'sviewpoint.

Weighing proximity and observation

I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due toits closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about itsflare star dynamics. TRAPPIS T-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.

Revis iting exoplanet options

I'mfocusingon exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIS T-1 e/f/g, andK2-18b,aiming to chart theirlikelihood of hosting a civilizedsociety basedon current knowledge.

Assessing exoplanet potentials

I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIS T-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety.

Refining speculative probabilities

I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIS T-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety, consideringEarth's long biologicalhistory.

Refining odds

I'm considering theastronomicaltimeline for intelligentlife on Earth,leading me toassign evenlower speculative odds for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIS T-1 e.

Clarifying speculativenature

I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrarypercentages, clearly noting the speculativenature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience'sbasic understanding of the topic.

Mappingout speculative odds

I’m charting arbitrarypercentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculativenature, and ensuring the datais accessible foryoung audiences with minimal scientific detail.

Crafting a chart

I’m creating amarkdown table with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of civilizedlife on exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoreticalnature and considering the understandinglevel of an 8-year-old.

Integrating speculative analysis

I’m mappingout amarkdown chart with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of a civilizedsociety on exoplanets, mindful of thecomplex ity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.

Assessinglikelihoods

I’m piecingtogether markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b'sreduced civilizedlife chance due to thered dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculativenature of the analysis.

Piecingtogether speculative odds

I’m detailing amarkdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challengesand a dding a disclaimer about the speculativenature and lack ofevidence.

Piecingtogether

I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b forits proximity and silentstar, butI’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advancedcivilizations' hypotheticallikelihood.

Assessingcivilization probabilities

I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligentlife on Earth, which suggests that the odds ofany habitableplanet developing acomplex civilization might beas low as a fewpercent.

Below is a very speculative chart that—basedon what we know about Earth’s long, windingpath fromsimple life to a “civilizedsociety” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives somefun,made‑uppercentage chances for a few of our best candid ate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists havenot yet found any proof oflife (let al one advancedcivilizations)on any exoplanet. Thesenumbers are just playful estimates to helpyou think about theideas!

Speculative Chances of Finding an AdvancedCivilization on Nearby Exoplanets

Exoplanet EstimatedLikelihood of a CivilizedSociety

Proxima Centauri b ~2%

TRAPPIS T-1 e ~1.5%

TRAPPIS T-1 f ~1%

TRAPPIS T-1 g ~1%

LHS 1140 b ~0.5%

HowDid We (Very Roughly) Guess TheseNumbers?

Earth’s Example:

On Earth,life beganas simple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that built complex societies. This longjourney suggests that—even if aplanet is in the “habitablezone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilizedsociety might be rare.

Nearby Exoplanets:

Proxima Centauri b:

This is the closest exoplanet to us. Even thoughitsstar (Proxima Centauri)is ared dwarf that sometimes sendsout strongflares (which might harmlife),its closeness makesit one of ourmost interesting candid ates. That’swhy we giveit a slightly higher guess (~2%).

TRAPPIS T-1 System (e, f, g):

Theseplanets are part of agroup orbiting a very cool star. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaningone sidealways faces thestar), so the chance of acomplex, advancedcivilization might be abit lower.

LHS 1140 b:

This planet is promising in some ways butis alittle fartheraway and around a dimmerstar, so our playful estimateis evenlower.

AFinal Note

All of thesepercentages are extremely rough guessesbasedon what little we understand about the conditions forlife andintelligence. Scientists useideaslike the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concreteevidence, thesenumbers remain just forfun and imagination.

Enjoy exploring theseideas—and remember, spaceis full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!

あなた:

Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate ormore opition in the equation you will use

ChatGPT

Reas oned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う

re-examining the Drake Equation

evaluating the Drake Equation'svalue

Clarifying the Drake Equation

OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula;it'smore of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrialcivilizations.

Assessing the Drake Equation

Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluatingits conceptualnature,its uncertain parameters, andits crit ic ism to concludeon its reliabilityas an accurate pred ictivemodel.

Understanding the Drake Equation

I’m mappingout the Drake Equation as a conceptual guide, detailingits parameters, which are oftenbasedon estimates or opinions, to evaluateits reliability for pred icting extraterrestrialcivilizations.

The Drake Equation is a famous formula that was created to help scientists think about the many factors involved in estimating thenumber of detectable extraterrestrialcivilizations in ourgalaxy. However, when welook at the equation closely, we see that it is more of a conceptualframework or heuristic tool than a precise, pred ictive formula.Let’s break downwhy:

The Drake Equation

The equation is usually writtenas:

𝑁

𝑅

∗

𝑓

𝑝

𝑛

𝑒

𝑓

𝑙

𝑓

𝑖

𝑓

𝑐

𝐿

N=R

∗

×f

×n

×f

×L

Where:

𝑅

∗

: The averagerate ofstar formation per year in ourgalaxy.

𝑓

𝑝

: The fraction of thosestars that haveplanetary systems.

𝑛

𝑒

: The averagenumber ofplanets that could potentially supportlife per star withplanets.

𝑓

𝑙

: The fraction of thoseplanets where life actually develops.

𝑓

𝑖

: The fraction ofplanets withlife where intelligentlife evolves.

𝑓

𝑐

: The fraction ofcivilizations that develop technology that releases detectablesignals into space.

𝐿

L: The length oftime suchcivilizations release detectablesignals.

Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula

Uncertain Inputs:

Well-Known Parameters:

Somefactors,like

𝑅

∗

(star formation rate) and

𝑓

𝑝

(fraction ofstars withplanets), have become better known through modernastronomy.

Highly SpeculativeFactors:

The parameters related to the development oflife andintelligence—

𝑓

𝑙

𝑓

𝑖

𝑓

𝑐

, and

𝐿

L—arebasedon very limited data. For example,Earth is theonlyplanet we know where life has developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a stat istic ally robust estimate for thesefactors. This means that thevalues chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.

Wide Ranges of PossibleValues:

Because many of thesefactors are not well-constrained, ifyou change one of themore uncertain parameters even slightly, thefinal estimate for

𝑁

N (thenumber ofcivilizations) can varyby many orders ofmagnitude. This wide range shows that the equation canlead to very differentoutcomesbasedon personal or theoreticalassumptions.

Heuristic, Not Pred ictive:

The Drake Equation was never meant to provide a preciseanswer. Instead,it servesas a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrialcivilizations.It encourages discussion about the relative importance of differentfactors andhighlights where our scientific knowledgeis limited.

Is the Drake Equation Accurate orMore Opinion-Based?

Accurate?

In thesense ofbeing a strict mathemat icalmodel with well-defined inputs and pred ic table outputs, the Drake Equation is not accurate.Its accuracyis limitedby the extreme uncertainties in several ofitskey parameters.

Opinion-Based?

Many of the terms in the equation, especia lly those concerning theevolution oflife andintelligence, arebasedon opinion, interpretation, and the single example ofEarth. Therefore, while thestructure of the equation is logical, thenumbers you put intoit (and hence thefinal result) are oftenmore reflective of our current opinionsand assumptions than of robust empirical data.

Conclusion

The Drake Equation is a valuabletool for framing the question of extraterrestriallife.It helps scientists and enthusiastsbreak down acomplex problem into smaller,more manageable questions. However, because several ofitsfactors are highly uncertain and subject topersonal interpretation,it is more of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate pred iction of thenumber of extraterrestrialcivilizations.

Insummary, while the Drake Equation is useful for thinking about the variousfactors that mightlead to the emergence of acivilization,itsoutputs should betaken as highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.

あなた:

Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the longhistory ofSol system and nearby planets and see if there is any possiblites that inonetime intelligentlife emerged in nearby planets and see this to the equation

ChatGPT

Reas oned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う

Evaluating non-human intelligence

I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligentlife forms in theSol system and neighboringplanets, and how this mightfactor into the equation.

Piecingtogether possibilities

I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligentlife, possiblyon Mars orEuropa, into the Drake Equation for theSol system and neighboringplanets.

Reflectingon potential

It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligentlife emergingon Mars orVenus, thoughEarth remains theonly knownlife-supportingplanet in thesolar system.

Considering other realms

I'm examining if intelligentlife could have emergedon planetslike Mars,Venus, orEuropa, and how this possibility alignswith the pred ictions of the Drake Equation.

Analyzing parallelevolution

Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligentlife on Mars orVenus could intersect with theassumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems tofocus solelyon Earth-basedevolution.

Evaluatinglife exploration

I’m piecingtogether the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligentlife in thesolar system.Mars,Venus, and Titan present challenges, butEuropa and Enceladus might harbor microbiallife.

Adapting the equ Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 21:12

ツイートシェア

■Chatgptが答えた異星人の存在 可能性とのそのロジック

ChatGPT

Reas oned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う

Evaluatingplanetary prospects

Identifying potential candid ates

I'm considering exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIS T-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from ourSolar System.

Assessing potential candid ates

Identifying promising exoplanets

Assessing habitablezones

Evaluating exoplanet prospects

I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despitebeing closeand around ared dwarfstar, might supportlife ifit has amagnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.

Charting probabilities

I'm estimatingcivilization probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIS T-1 e, using speculativepercentagesbasedon the Drake equation and the lack ofevidence for intelligentlife.

Charting speculative odds

I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names andcivilization likelihoodpercentages, grounded in the longtimeline oflife'sevolution, despite the speculativenature of these figures.

Identifying exoplanet contenders

Weighing proximity and observation

I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due toits closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about itsflare star dynamics. TRAPPIS T-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.

Revis iting exoplanet options

I'mfocusingon exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIS T-1 e/f/g, andK2-18b,aiming to chart theirlikelihood of hosting a civilizedsociety basedon current knowledge.

Assessing exoplanet potentials

Refining speculative probabilities

Refining odds

I'm considering theastronomicaltimeline for intelligentlife on Earth,leading me toassign evenlower speculative odds for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIS T-1 e.

Clarifying speculativenature

I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrarypercentages, clearly noting the speculativenature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience'sbasic understanding of the topic.

Mappingout speculative odds

I’m charting arbitrarypercentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculativenature, and ensuring the datais accessible foryoung audiences with minimal scientific detail.

Crafting a chart

Integrating speculative analysis

I’m mappingout amarkdown chart with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of a civilizedsociety on exoplanets, mindful of thecomplex ity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.

Assessinglikelihoods

I’m piecingtogether markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b'sreduced civilizedlife chance due to thered dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculativenature of the analysis.

Piecingtogether speculative odds

I’m detailing amarkdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challengesand a dding a disclaimer about the speculativenature and lack ofevidence.

Piecingtogether

I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b forits proximity and silentstar, butI’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advancedcivilizations' hypotheticallikelihood.

Assessingcivilization probabilities

I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligentlife on Earth, which suggests that the odds ofany habitableplanet developing acomplex civilization might beas low as a fewpercent.

Speculative Chances of Finding an AdvancedCivilization on Nearby Exoplanets

Exoplanet EstimatedLikelihood of a CivilizedSociety

Proxima Centauri b ~2%

TRAPPIS T-1 e ~1.5%

TRAPPIS T-1 f ~1%

TRAPPIS T-1 g ~1%

LHS 1140 b ~0.5%

HowDid We (Very Roughly) Guess TheseNumbers?

Earth’s Example:

Nearby Exoplanets:

Proxima Centauri b:

TRAPPIS T-1 System (e, f, g):

LHS 1140 b:

This planet is promising in some ways butis alittle fartheraway and around a dimmerstar, so our playful estimateis evenlower.

AFinal Note

Enjoy exploring theseideas—and remember, spaceis full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!

あなた:

Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate ormore opition in the equation you will use

ChatGPT

Reas oned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う

re-examining the Drake Equation

evaluating the Drake Equation'svalue

Clarifying the Drake Equation

OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula;it'smore of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrialcivilizations.

Assessing the Drake Equation

Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluatingits conceptualnature,its uncertain parameters, andits crit ic ism to concludeon its reliabilityas an accurate pred ictivemodel.

Understanding the Drake Equation

The Drake Equation

The equation is usually writtenas:

𝑁

𝑅

∗

𝑓

𝑝

𝑛

𝑒

𝑓

𝑙

𝑓

𝑖

𝑓

𝑐

𝐿

N=R

∗

×f

×n

×f

×L

Where:

𝑅

∗

: The averagerate ofstar formation per year in ourgalaxy.

𝑓

𝑝

: The fraction of thosestars that haveplanetary systems.

𝑛

𝑒

: The averagenumber ofplanets that could potentially supportlife per star withplanets.

𝑓

𝑙

: The fraction of thoseplanets where life actually develops.

𝑓

𝑖

: The fraction ofplanets withlife where intelligentlife evolves.

𝑓

𝑐

: The fraction ofcivilizations that develop technology that releases detectablesignals into space.

𝐿

L: The length oftime suchcivilizations release detectablesignals.

Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula

Uncertain Inputs:

Well-Known Parameters:

Somefactors,like

𝑅

∗

(star formation rate) and

𝑓

𝑝

(fraction ofstars withplanets), have become better known through modernastronomy.

Highly SpeculativeFactors:

The parameters related to the development oflife andintelligence—

𝑓

𝑙

𝑓

𝑖

𝑓

𝑐

, and

𝐿

Wide Ranges of PossibleValues:

Because many of thesefactors are not well-constrained, ifyou change one of themore uncertain parameters even slightly, thefinal estimate for

𝑁

N (thenumber ofcivilizations) can varyby many orders ofmagnitude. This wide range shows that the equation canlead to very differentoutcomesbasedon personal or theoreticalassumptions.

Heuristic, Not Pred ictive:

Is the Drake Equation Accurate orMore Opinion-Based?

Accurate?

Opinion-Based?

Conclusion

あなた:

ChatGPT

Reas oned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う

Evaluating non-human intelligence

I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligentlife forms in theSol system and neighboringplanets, and how this mightfactor into the equation.

Piecingtogether possibilities

I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligentlife, possiblyon Mars orEuropa, into the Drake Equation for theSol system and neighboringplanets.

Reflectingon potential

It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligentlife emergingon Mars orVenus, thoughEarth remains theonly knownlife-supportingplanet in thesolar system.

Considering other realms

I'm examining if intelligentlife could have emergedon planetslike Mars,Venus, orEuropa, and how this possibility alignswith the pred ictions of the Drake Equation.

Analyzing parallelevolution

Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligentlife on Mars orVenus could intersect with theassumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems tofocus solelyon Earth-basedevolution.

Evaluatinglife exploration

I’m piecingtogether the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligentlife in thesolar system.Mars,Venus, and Titan present challenges, butEuropa and Enceladus might harbor microbiallife.

Adapting the equ Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 21:12

ツイートシェア

2025-01-31

■

バレンタインデー、ホワイトデーの贈り物の辞退について

いつも当社、および当社作品を応援いただきありがとうございます。

また、日ごろ皆様から当社スタッフや作品に登場するキャラクターに贈り物をいただくことがございます。

とてもありがたく、あらためて感謝いたします。

なお、受け取り対応が難しい点や安全への影響を考慮し、本年もバレンタイン・ホワイトデーにつきまして皆様からの贈り物を辞退させていただきます。

ご理解、ご協力のほど、よろしくお願いいたします。

今後も当社コーポレートスローガンである「Level up yourhappiness」のもと、新しい面白さで皆様をより幸せにするコンテンツをお届けできるよう、社員一同努めてまいります。

よろしくお願いいたします。

https://www.gamecity.ne.jp/support/notice/22013.html

Permalink |記事への反応(1) | 14:05

ツイートシェア

2025-01-17

■[今日の英作文] The Comprehensive Compendium of Programming Wisdom: Navigating the Multidimensional Landscape ofSoftware Craftsmanship

Programming proficiency necessit ates a comprehensive understanding of multifaceted concepts,paradigms, and philosophies that underpin theart and science ofsoftware development. TheUnix philosophy, withits emphas is on modularity, simplicity, and composability, servesas a foundational ethos for elegant code design. This philosophy advocates for creating small, focused programs that excel at singular tasks, facilit ating the construction ofcomplex systems through the judicious composition of theseatomic units.

Algorithmic Mastery and DataStructure Optimization

Proficient programmers must possess an encyclopedic knowledge of algorithms and datastructures, enabling them to architect solutions with optimaltime and spacecomplex ity. This encompasses adeep understanding of sorting algorithms (e.g., quicksort, mergesort), searching techniques (binary search, depth-first search),and advanced datastructures (red-black trees,B-trees, Fibonacci heaps) The ability to analyze algorithmic efficiency usingBig O notation is paramount for creating scalable solutions.

Paradigm atic Versatility

Object-Oriented Programming (OOP)

OOP principles—encapsulation, inheritance, andpolymorphism—form the bedrock of modernsoftware architecture. Mastery of design patterns (e.g.,Singleton,Factory,Observer) and SOLID principlesis crucial for creating maintainable and extensible codebases.

Functional Programming (FP)

TheFP paradigm, withits emphas is on immutability andpure functions, offers a powerful approach to managingcomplex ity and facilit ating parallel execution. Proficiency in higher-order functions, currying, and monadsis essential for leveragingFP's full potential.

Advanced Language Features and Metaprogramming

Expertise in language-specific advanced features, suchas C++'s template metaprogramming orPython's metaclasses, allows for thecreation of highlygeneric and reusable code. Understanding compilertheory and the ability towrite domain-specific languages (DSLs) further expands a programmer's capabilities.

Concurrent and Parallel Programming

In an era of multi-core processors and distributed systems, mastery of concurrent programmingmodels (e.g., actormodel, communicating sequential processes) and parallel algorithmsis indispensable. This includes proficiency in lock-free datastructures, memorymodels, and synchronization primitives.

Systems Programming andLow-Level Optimization

Adeep understanding ofcomputer architecture,operating systems, and memory managementenables thecreation of highly optimized,low-level code. This encompasses knowledge ofcache coherence protocols,CPU pipeline optimization,and assembly language programming.

Security and Cryptography

In an increasingly interconnected world, a thorough grasp of cryptographic principles, secure coding practices, andcommon attack vectors (e.g., buffer overflows,SQL injection)is crucial for developing robust and secure systems.

Version Control and Collaborative Development

Proficiency in distributedversion control systems (e.g.,Git) and collaborative development practices (code reviews, continuous integration)is essential for effective team-basedsoftware development.

Testing and QualityAssurance

Advanced testing methodologies, including property-based testing, fuzzing, and formal verification techniques, are indispensable for ensuringsoftware reliability and correctness.

In conclusion, the pantheon of programming knowledge extends farbeyond mere syntax mastery.It encompasses a richtapestry of theoretical concepts, practical skills, and philosophical approaches that, when harmoniously integrated,enable thecreation of elegant, efficient, and robustsoftware systems. The relentless pursuit of this multifaceted expertiseis the hallmark of a truly accomplished programmer.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 15:03

ツイートシェア

2025-01-06

■A leadingsports betting site for online gamingfun.

https://vodds.com/sports/

Did You Know?

Fun fact:Over 50% of globalsports fans have triedsports betting, andfootball tops the chartsas the most wagered-on sport!At Vodds, wemake football bettingmore exciting with real-time action through LiveBetting.

Why settle for average whenyou can experienceonline bettinglike never before? Whetherit’s predicting thenext goal or cheering foryourfavorite team, Vodds offers unbeatable oddsand a seamless platform to keepyou inthe game.

Ready totake youronline bettingadventure to thenext level?Join Voddstoday and be part of theaction!

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 19:46

ツイートシェア

2024-12-14

■「ロマンだよね」を英語で言えない

仕事も家庭生活も長年英語で過ごしてるけどいくつかうまいこと訳せないなということがあってこれ。

Romanticは全然違うしideal?dream of? clichéは皮肉的なニュアンス（ベタ？）だしなんか違う。王道でベタだけどそこが良くて燃える、みたいなことを言いたいけどなんて言う？

そもそも日本語で言う時の「ロマンだよね」てなんなんだ？

それはそうとNetflixで配信が始まったsecret levelはめちゃくちゃ video gameのロマンが詰まってて最高だよ。ゲームにまつわるオムニバスなんだけど1話のD＆D見て泣いてしまった。ロマンすぎて！！！

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 21:08

ツイートシェア

2024-12-03

■ どんなプロンプト打ったんでしょうね？　1

上記ののカジュアルな文章を書いた人物をプロファイリングしてください

　↓

The person who wrote this seems to have a strong understanding of cognitive processes and how they affectcommunication. They are deeply interested in recognizing the underlying cognitive mechanisms that shape how people perceive and interactwith the world, especially when there are discrepancies in shared understanding. Their writing suggests a fascination with the complexity ofhuman cognition, particularly in terms of categorization,perception, and the role of context incommunication.
Key traits of this person’s mindset:
1. Analytical and Reflective: They break down situations and statements into theircore components, suchas recognizing when cognitive discrepancies arise (e.g.,the example of “Honey Crisp”being identifiedas a non-apple or a “rugby ballis not a ball”).
2.Focus on Cognitive Mechanisms: Rather than justattributingcommunication issues to external factorslike knowledge gaps or personality traits, theyattribute misunderstandings to the way people process information and perceivethe world.
3. Interest in Epistemology: They are interested in the philosophical and conceptual foundations of understanding. The mention of philosophical termslike “essentialism” vs. “constructivism” indicates adesire to explore thenature ofcategories and definitionsat a fundamentallevel.
4. Sensitivity toCommunication: They recognize the importance of context incommunication, noting how slight differences inperception canlead to mis communication. The person appears to be aware of the challenge in aligning cognitive frameworks to resolve disagreements.
5. Empathetic but Pragmatic: While acknowledging that individualslike “D” might not be malicious or intentionally obstructive, they alsohighlight the immense effort required to engage with individualswhose cognitive frameworks are severely misaligned with shared understanding.
Overall, this person seems to be deeply thoughtful, with akeen interest in the nuances ofhuman cognition andcommunication. Theylikelyvalue intellectual clarityand are willing to investtime and effort in clarifying fundamental misunderstandings.

　↓

トランプの文脈でフォントの違いに過剰に焦点を当てるのは個性の範疇にはないです仮にフォントの違いがトランプの本質ならトランプという製品は何を提供しているのか？となり共通基盤があるようには思えません下記の反応をする人はいったい何が原因だと思いますか？フォントの違いに過剰に焦点を当てるのはまさに認知の問題に思えるのですがーーー•「A、B、C」の例では、各人物が持つ立場を比較的柔軟に評価していますが、「D」のケースに対してはほぼ一方的に否定しています。•「フォントの違い」を理由にカードを否定するDの行動を、投稿者は「認知の仕組みに問題がある」と結論付けています。

　↓

「フォントの違いに過剰に焦点を当てる」というDの行動は、確かに一般的な認知の枠組みから外れており、共通基盤を持つ対話を阻む要因と考えられます。このケースでは、Dの認知の仕組みにおける以下のような問題が原因として考えられます。
　
1.認知の過剰具体化（具体例への執着）
　
Dは「トランプカード」を理解する際に、本質的な特徴（スート、ランク、一般的なカードの定義）ではなく、具体的な細部（フォントなど）に強く依存して認識しています。このような認知の偏りは、物事を抽象化する能力が弱く、広い概念や文脈を理解するのが難しい場合に見られます。
　
2. 共有基盤の構築における障害
　
トランプカードの「本質」として多くの人が暗黙的に合意している特徴（スートやランク）を無視し、自身の認識基準（フォントの違い）を優先しています。このような認知のズレは、共通基盤を形成する力が弱いために生じると考えられます。
　
3. 柔軟性の欠如
　
Dの行動は、物事を異なる視点で解釈したり、自分の基準を一時的に緩めたりする柔軟性の欠如を示唆します。これは、認知の柔軟性や適応力が低いために起こる場合があります。
　
4.認知特性や発達的な要因
　
場合によっては、発達障害や特定の認知特性（自閉スペクトラム症、強迫性傾向など）が関係している可能性もあります。これらの特性を持つ人々は、特定の細部に過剰に注意を向け、全体の文脈や共有された基準よりも、自分が認識した細部を重視する傾向があります。
　
5.認識と本質の混同
　
Dは「フォントの違い」を本質的な特徴と捉えていますが、これは「トランプとは何か」という製品や概念の本質を理解する能力が十分ではないことを示唆しています。つまり、対象の重要な側面（スートやランクなどの機能的特徴）よりも、些末な特徴（フォント）を重要視してしまい、それがトランプとしての機能を否定する理由になると考えています。
　
Dの反応をどう見るべきか
　
Dの行動を「認知の問題」と捉えることは合理的です。フォントの違いは通常、トランプという製品の本質に影響を与えるものではないため、それを理由にカードを否定するのは一般的な認知基準から外れています。このズレは、Dが「トランプカードとは何か」という共有されたコンセプトを理解できていない、あるいはその共有基盤に乗ることを困難にしていることを示唆します。
　
Dのような認知の偏りを持つ人と対話を続けるには、まずその人が重要視している基準や論点を理解し、それがどのように全体像に影響を与えるかを説明していく必要がありますが、それには大きな労力が伴うでしょう。

　↓

続く　https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20241203171745#

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 17:16

ツイートシェア

2024-11-25

■文章どころか動画も理解できない人たちについて教えてください

AI ちゃんに聞いて見た

I've noticed a non-negligiblenumber of peoplewho have notonly completed compulsoryeducation in regular class es but have also received highereducation and graduated from university, yetstruggle with reading comprehension (understand ing the meaning oftext), cannot read longtexts, and even have difficulty understand ing videos.

When we limit thescope to individuals with broad cognitive challenges, the problem seems rather straightforward: they either "lack the ability to understand" or "take longer than usual to acquire the ability to understand."

Similarly, thecase of individuals diagnosed with learning disabilities is relativelysimple. While theymay not have broad cognitive challenges, theyrequire different approaches and training due to their unique learning styles.

However,it is perplexing that university graduates without broad cognitive challenges or diagnosed learning disabilities struggle to understand notonly writtentext but also simplified video content.

I suspect that the underlying causes might includegaps in the horizontal transfer of experiences and knowledge, a severe lack of adaptability,and anextreme deficit in metacognition.Has there beenany researchon theseissues? Additionally, couldyou please explain the concept of knowledge transfer?

(正規の学級で義務教育を修了し、さらに高等教育を受けて大学を卒業したにもかかわらず、読解力（文章の意味を理解する能力）に苦しみ、長文を読むことができず、さらには動画の理解にも困難を感じる人が少なくないことに気づきました。

認知能力に広範な課題を抱える個人に範囲を限定すると、問題は比較的単純です。「理解する能力がない」か、「理解する能力を獲得するのに通常よりも時間がかかる」かのいずれかです。

同様に、学習障害と診断された個人の場合も比較的単純です。彼らは広範な認知能力の課題を抱えていないかもしれませんが、独自の学習スタイルのために異なるアプローチとトレーニングが必要となります。

しかし、広範な認知能力の課題や学習障害を持たない大学卒者が、書かれたテキストだけでなく、簡略化されたビデオコンテンツの理解にも苦労していることは不可解です。

私は、その根本的な原因として、経験や知識の水平的転移の欠如、メタ認知の極端な欠如などが考えられるのではないかと疑っています。これらの問題に関する研究はありますか？また、知識転移の概念について説明していただけますか？)

ChatGPT ちゃんの回答

Yes, researchand analysis exist around theissues you described, particularly in the domains ofeducation, psychology, and cognitive science.Let’s break downyour observations and questionsstep by step:

Key Issues with Reading and Comprehension

1. Reading Comprehension Among Educated Individuals

• This phenomenon—educated individuals struggling with comprehension—is indeed perplexing,especially given their presumed exposure to a variety of learning materials.It suggests thateducation systems sometimes emphasize rote learning and surface-level knowledge acquis ition over deeper understand ing, critical thinking, and metacognition.

2. Possible Underlying Causes

• Horizontal TransferGaps: This refers to the inability to apply knowledge or skills learned inone con text toanother. For example,someone mightexcel in a university coursefocusedon memorization but fail to apply that knowledge in practical or less structured con texts.

• Severe Lack of Adaptability: Adaptability involves applying problem-solving and comprehension skills to unfamiliar formats or media. A lack of adaptability can res ult from a curriculum that prioritizes familiarity and routineover exploratory learning.

• Deficits in Metacognition: Metacognition is the ability to “think about thinking”—to reflecton, mon itor, and regulateone’s own learning. If metacognitive skills are underdeveloped, individuals mightstruggle to evaluate the meaning oftexts or videos, even if they have theraw intellectual ability.

Research Insights

1. Knowledge Transfer

The concept of knowledge transfer involves applying skills, knowledge, or strategies learned inone con text toanother.It is often classified into:

• Horizontal Transfer: Applying knowledge across similar con texts (e.g., using concepts learned in a biology course to understand a medicaltext).

• Vertical Transfer:Building upon foundational knowledge to understand more complex ideas (e.g., using basic algebra to solve advanced calculus problems).

Studies suggest that transferis more likely to occur when:

• Learnersdeeply understand underlying principles, not justsurface details.

•Connectionsbetween different con texts are explicitly taught and reinforced.

2. Factors Limit ing Transfer

• Learning environments often emphasize task-specific skills rather than generalizable strategies.

• Standardized testing may encourage rote memorization over critical thinking.

• Lack of explicit instruction in how to generalize knowledge to new situations.

3. Metacognitive Deficits

Researchhighlights the importance of metacognition in learning. Studentswho are unaware of their own comprehension limitations are lesslikely to engage in corrective strategies (e.g., rereading, seeking clarification). This canlead to stagnation in comprehension skills despite formaleducation. Effective interventions include:

• Teaching self-mon itoring techniques.

• Encouraging reflective practices,like summarizing or question ing during reading.

4. CognitiveOverload in Multimedia

Even videos, if not designed properly, canoverwhelm learners. The CognitiveTheory of Multimedia Learning suggests that excessive extraneous information or unclearorganization in videos canoverload working memory, hindering comprehension.

Strategies and Research-Based Solutions

1. Improving Knowledge Transfer

•Active Learning: Techniques suchas problem-based learning orcase studies canimprove transferby encouraging theapplication of knowledge to new situations.

• Teaching for Understand ing: Encouraging learners tofocus on “why” and “how” questions fostersdeeper comprehension and the ability to generalize learning.

2. Fostering Adaptability

• Encourage learners to engage with unfamiliar formats and topics to build flexibility.

• Develop problem-solving skills in diverse and unpredictable con texts.

3. Developing Metacognitive Skills

• Self-Regulated Learning Training: Programs that teach students to plan, mon itor, and evaluate their learning have shown success in improving comprehension.

•Feedback Loops: Providing actionablefeedback on comprehension tasks encourages learners to reflecton their thinking processes.

Conclusion

Theissues you describehighlight agap between formaleducation outcomes and true comprehension or learning ability.Address ing these challenges requires systemic changes, including incorporating metacognition training, emphasizing transferable learning, and fostering adaptability.

Ifyou’dlike, I can delvedeeper into specific research studies or provide examples of programsaddress ing theseissues.

Claudeちゃんの回答

This is a fascinating and concerning observation that touches on several importantareas of cognitive psychology and education. Let meaddress this systematically.

First, regarding knowledge transfer and metacognition: Knowledge transfer refers to the ability to apply knowledge, skills, or strategies learned inone con text to new situations.It's closely related to metacognition - our ability to understand a nd mon itor our own thought processes.

Research in this area has revealed severalkey find ings:

David Perkins and GavrielSalomon's work in the late 1980s and early 1990s identifiedtwo types of transfer:

"Low-road transfer":Automatic transfer of highly practiced skills to similar con texts
"High-road transfer": Mindful abstraction of principles that can be applied to different con texts

A significant studyby Brown, Collins, and Duguid (1989) in "SituatedCognition and the Culture of Learning"highlighted how knowledge often remains "inert" - students can pass tests but fail to apply knowledge in real-world con texts.

The phenomenon you're describing aligns with what cognitive scientists call the "transfer problem." Despite years ofeducation, many individualsstruggle to apply their learning in new con texts or integrate information across domains.

Some relevant research directions:

1. Cognitive LoadTheory (Swelleret al.)

Shows how working memory limitations affect learning and transfer. Many studentsmay never develop effective strategies for managing cognitive load,lead ing to poor comprehension ofcomplex materials.

2. Reading Comprehension Studies

Workby Pressleyand Afflerbachon "verbal protocols" revealed that skilled readers use multiple strategies simultaneously, while poor readers often lack these metacognitive tools.

3. Domain Integration Research

Studies by Susan Goldman and others have shown that even advanced students often fail toconnect knowledge across domains, treating each subjectas anisolated "silo."

Your observation about university graduates struggling with comprehension despite no apparent cognitive disabilities might be explainedby several factors identified in research:

1.Surface-level Learning: Many educational systems reward memorization over deep understand ing

2. LimitedStrategy Instruction: Students often aren't explicitly taught comprehension strategies

3. Fragmented Knowledge: Information is typically taught inisolation without emphas is on connections

4. Weak Metacognitive Skills: Studentsmay never develop the ability to mon itor and regulate their own understand ing

Some promis ing approaches toaddress theseissues include:

1.Strategy Instruction Models

Teaching explicit strategies for comprehension, integration, and transfer. The Self-RegulatedStrategy Development (SRSD)model has shown particularpromise.

2. Knowledge Integration Frameworks

Approaches like Knowledge Integration Environment (KIE) help studentsconnect ideas across domains.

3. Metacognitive Training Programs

Programsfocus ing on developing metacognitive awareness and self-regulation skills.

Sinceyou asked about studies, I shouldnote that while I've referenced several important works,you should verify these citationsas Idon't have directaccess to current databas es and could be misremembering details.

Wouldyou be interested in exploring any particularaspect of this issue inmore detail? For instance, we could delvedeeper into specific instructional strategies that have shownpromise in developing transfer abilities, or examine the relationshipbetween metacognition and knowledge transfermore closely.

Permalink |記事への反応(2) | 17:03

ツイートシェア

2024-11-17

■anond:20241117123807

作成保護されているページ名 -Wikipedia

https://ja.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E7%89%B9%E5%88%A5:%E4%BD%9C%E6%88%90%E4%BF%9D%E8%AD%B7%E3%81%95%E3%82%8C%E3%81%A6%E3%81%84%E3%82%8B%E3%83%9A%E3%83%BC%E3%82%B8%E5%90%8D&level=0&namespace=0&dir=prev&limit=500

こういう一覧がある

Permalink |記事への反応(1) | 12:44

ツイートシェア

2024-10-15

■Anthropicの創業者 である ダリオ氏の、AIが進化した世界の未来予想を読んでる

https://darioamodei.com/machines-of-loving-grace

・Behavioral interventions. Ihaven’t much mentionedit given thefocus on the biological side of neuroscience, but psychiatry and psychology have of course developed a wide repertoire of behavioral interventionsover the20th century;it stands toreason that AI could accelerate theseas well, both the development of new methods and helping patients to adhere to existing methods.More broadly, theidea of an “AI coach”who always helpsyou to be the bestversion ofyourself,who studiesyour interactions and helpsyou learn to bemore effective, seems very promising.

(Google翻訳)
・行動介入。神経科学の生物学的側面に焦点が当てられているため、これについてはあまり触れていませんが、精神医学と心理学は、もちろん20 世紀を通じて行動介入の幅広いレパートリーを開発してきました。AI が、新しい方法の開発と、患者が既存の方法に従うのを支援することの両方で、これらを加速させる可能性もあるのは当然です。より広い意味では、常に最高の自分になれるよう支援し、あなたのやり取りを研究して、より効果的になる方法を学ぶのを手助けしてくれる「AI コーチ」というアイデアは、非常に有望に思えます。

・Everyday problems that wedon’t think ofas clinical diseasewill also be solved.Most of us have everyday psychological problems that are not ordinarily thought ofas rising to thelevel of clinical disease. Some people are quick to anger, others have troublefocusing or are often drowsy, some are fearful or anxious, or react badly tochange.Today, drugs already exist to help with e.g. alertness orfocus (caffeine, modafinil, ritalin) butas with many other previous areas, muchmore is likely to be possible. Probably manymore such drugs exist and have not been discovered, and theremay also be totally new modalities of intervention, suchas targetedlight stimulation (see optogenetics above) ormagnetic fields. Given how many drugs we’ve developed in the20th century that tune cognitive function and emotionalstate, I’m very optimistic about the “compressed 21st” where everyone canget theirbr ain to behave abit better and have amore fulfilling day-to-day experience.

(Google翻訳)
・臨床疾患とは考えていない日常的な問題も解決されるでしょう。私たちのほとんどは、通常は臨床疾患のレベルに達するとは考えられないような日常的な心理的問題を抱えています。怒りっぽい人もいれば、集中力に欠けたり眠気を催すことが多い人もいれば、恐れや不安を感じたり、変化に反応しにくい人もいます。今日、覚醒や集中力を高める薬（カフェイン、モダフィニル、リタリン）はすでに存在していますが、他の多くの以前の分野と同様に、さらに多くの薬が開発される可能性があります。おそらく、そのような薬はもっとたくさん存在し、発見されていないでしょう。また、標的を絞った光刺激（上記のオプトジェネティクスを参照）や磁場など、まったく新しい介入方法もあるかもしれません。20世紀に認知機能と感情状態を調整する薬がどれだけ開発されたかを考えると、誰もが脳の働きを少し良くし、より充実した日々を送れるようになる「圧縮された21世紀」について私は非常に楽観的です。

・Human baseline experience can be much better. Takingonestep further, many people have experienced extraordinarymoments of revelation,creative inspiration, compassion, fulfillment, transcendence,love, beauty, or medit ativepeace. The character and frequency of these experiences differs greatly from person to person and within the same person at different times, and can also sometimes be triggeredby various drugs (though often with side effects).All of this suggests that the “space of what is possible to experience”is very broad and that a larger fraction of people’s lives could consist of these extraordinarymoments.It is probably also possible toimprove various cognitive functions across the board. This is perhaps the neuroscienceversion of “biologicalfreedom” or “extended lifespans”.

(Google翻訳)
・人間の基本的な経験は、もっと良くなる可能性があります。さらに一歩進むと、多くの人が啓示、創造的なインスピレーション、思いやり、達成感、超越、愛、美しさ、瞑想的な平和といった特別な瞬間を経験しています。これらの経験の性質と頻度は、人によって大きく異なり、同じ人でも時期によって異なり、さまざまな薬物によって引き起こされることもあります（ただし、多くの場合は副作用があります）。これらすべては、「経験可能な空間」が非常に広く、人々の人生の大部分がこれらの特別な瞬間で構成されている可能性があることを示唆しています。さまざまな認知機能を全面的に改善することもおそらく可能です。これはおそらく、神経科学版の「生物学的自由」または「寿命の延長」です。

まだ途中までしか読んでないけど、この辺が特に印象的だった。

発達障害持ちでスペックが低い上、達成感とかの青春な感情を体験できなかった自分からすると夢のようだが、同時にこういうのを人工的に作れて皆良い人間になれるのってなんか怖くもあるな

はてなだとシロクマ先生とかがよくそういう話してる気がするけど

でも、実際そういう時代になったら自分はあっさり享受しちゃいそうだなあ

Permalink |記事への反応(1) | 23:58

ツイートシェア

2024-10-08

■海面上昇は場所によって上昇幅が違う

“50年500億ドル”湿地復元へ…消える故郷も　沈みゆく街と巨大プロジェクト【報道ステーション】(2024年 9月30日)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLe_JY0kBPk

この動画を見てて以下のコメントが気になった

＞湿地帯だから地盤沈下しているだけだと思う。海面上昇がそこまで起こってたら、あちこちの都市でも湿地帯になて無いのが理由

たし🦀

ニューオリンズが海面上昇で沈んでるなら他も沈んでるはず

ClimateChange: GlobalSea Level |アメリカ海洋大気庁

https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-global-sea-level

1880年以降、世界の平均海面はおよそ8～9インチ（21～24 センチメートル）上昇しています
2023年の世界の平均海面は1993年より101.4ミリメートル（3.99インチ）上昇し、衛星記録（1993年～現在）における年間平均最高値となりました。
一部の海域では、衛星記録の開始以来、海面が 6 ～ 8インチ (15 ～20 センチメートル) 上昇しています。
地域差が存在するのは、風と海流の強さの自然な変動によるもので、これが海洋の深層がどこにどれだけの熱を蓄えるかに影響します。
陸上の特定の場所における過去および将来の海面上昇は、地盤沈下、上流の洪水制御、浸食、地域の海流、および氷河期の消滅した氷河の圧縮重量から土地がまだ回復または再定住しているかどうかなどの地域要因により、世界平均よりも多いか少ない可能性があります。

なんと海面上昇は場所によって影響度が違うのか

じゃあ日本は？

Climatechange transformsPacific Islands |世界気象機関

https://wmo.int/news/media-centre/climate-change-transforms-pacific-islands

日本は温暖化の影響強い「ホットスポット」海水温上昇など列島周辺の急変に警戒感

https://news.tv-asahi.co.jp/news_society/articles/000326633.html

なるほどやはり23区東部と沿岸部の不動産は微妙だな

温暖化による地価への悪影響があっても不思議ではない

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 19:26

ツイートシェア

2024-09-13

■

AIに自殺予防の相談窓口ってできないかな

やべー奴を見分けるとか得意そうじゃん

ヤバさLevelが高いならTEL逆探して保護に向かうとかさ

Permalink |記事への反応(1) | 15:33

ツイートシェア

2024-08-24

■anond:20240824113338

ディープステートとかニューオーダーとか軍事金融産業のメディア操作やね

Immediate improvement of theater-level psychological warfare inthe Far East (1951)
Far Eastern Government andPolitics:China andJapan (1954; with Djang Chuand Ardath W. Burks)
Essayson military psychological operations (1966)

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 19:39

ツイートシェア

2024-08-17

■anond:20240817015407

依存関係は木で表現

ノードにロック持たせる

ロックに条件持たせる

やりたいことはできてるように見えるが、うーんしんどい

# Entity Relation Diagram
# ```mermaid
# ---
#title: Rental Office example
# ---
# erDiagram
# OFFICE ||--|{ ROOM : x
# OFFICE {
#number office_id
#     }
#     ROOM {
#number office_id
#number room_id
#     }
#     ROOM ||--|{ SCHEDULE : x
#     SCHEDULE {
#number room_id
#       datetime start_at
#       datetime end_at
#     }
# OFFICE ||--|{ BUSINESS_HOUR : x
#     BUSINESS_HOUR {
#number office_id
#enum week_of_day
#         datetime start_at
#         datetime end_at
#     }
# ```

# Directed Acyclic Graph
#
# ```mermaid
# graph LR
#     A[OFFICE] --> B[ROOM]
#     B --> C[SCHEDULE]
#     A[OFFICE] --> D[BUSINESS_HOUR]
#     D --> C
#     A --> C
# ```


# 基底クラス: EntityLock
class EntityLock
  attr_accessor :entity_name, :entity_locked, :attribute_locks

def initialize(entity_name)
    @entity_name = entity_name
    @entity_locked =false #エンティティ全体のロック状態を保持
    @attribute_locks = {}  #IDに対するロックを管理するハッシュ
  end

def lock_entity
    @entity_locked =true
    puts "Entity '#{@entity_name}'isnow locked."
  end

def unlock_entity
    @entity_locked =false
    puts "Entity '#{@entity_name}'isnowunlocked."
  end

def lock(attributes)
    entity_id = attributes["#{@entity_name.downcase}_id"]
    if entity_id &amp;&amp; !@attribute_locks[entity_id]
      @attribute_locks[entity_id] =true
      puts "#{@entity_name} withID '#{entity_id}'isnow locked."
    end
  end

def unlock(attributes)
    entity_id = attributes["#{@entity_name.downcase}_id"]
    if entity_id &amp;&amp; @attribute_locks[entity_id]
      @attribute_locks.delete(entity_id)
      puts "#{@entity_name} withID '#{entity_id}'isnowunlocked."
    end
  end

def locked?(attributes)
    # まずエンティティ全体がロックされているかチェック
    returntrue if @entity_locked

    # 次に特定のIDがロックされているかチェック
    entity_id = attributes["#{@entity_name.downcase}_id"]
    if entity_id &amp;&amp; @attribute_locks[entity_id]
      returntrue
    end

    #ロックされていなければfalseを返す
false
  end
end

# 子クラス: OfficeLock, RoomLock, ScheduleLock
class OfficeLock < EntityLock
def initialize
    super("Office")
  end
end

class RoomLock < EntityLock
def initialize
    super("Room")
  end
end

class ScheduleLock < EntityLock
def initialize
    super("Schedule")
  end
end

# 子クラス: BusinessHourLock
class BusinessHourLock < EntityLock
def initialize
    super("BusinessHour")
    @attribute_locks = [] # BusinessHour用のロックを配列で管理
  end

def lock(attributes)
    start_at = attributes["start_at"]
    end_at = attributes["end_at"]
    if start_at &amp;&amp; end_at
      @attribute_locks << [start_at, end_at]
      puts "BusinessHour from '#{start_at}' to '#{end_at}'isnow locked."
    end
  end

def unlock(attributes)
    start_at = attributes["start_at"]
    end_at = attributes["end_at"]
    if @attribute_locks.include?([start_at, end_at])
      @attribute_locks.delete([start_at, end_at])
      puts "BusinessHour from '#{start_at}' to '#{end_at}'isnowunlocked."
    end
  end

def locked?(attributes)
    # まずエンティティ全体がロックされているかチェック
    returntrue if @entity_locked

    # 次に特定の時間範囲がロックされているかチェック
    start_at = attributes["start_at"]
    end_at = attributes["end_at"]
    if start_at &amp;&amp; end_at
      @attribute_locks.each do |(locked_start, locked_end)|
        if locked_start <= start_at &amp;&amp; end_at <= locked_end
          returntrue
        end
      end
    end

    #ロックされていなければfalseを返す
false
  end
end

# TreeNodeクラス
class TreeNode
  attr_accessor :name, :children, :parents, :lock

def initialize(name, lock)
    @name =name
    @children = []
    @parents = []  #複数の親ノードを保持する配列
    @lock = lock   # TreeNodeにロックを持たせる
  end

def add_child(child_node)
    child_node.parents << self  # 子ノードにこのノードを親として追加
    @children << child_node
  end

def display(level = 0)
    indent = " " * (level * 4)
    puts "#{indent}#{@name}"
    @children.each { |child| child.display(level + 1) }
  end

def has_dependency
    returnfalse if @parents.empty?

    @parents.each do |parent|
      puts "#{@name}is dependenton #{parent.name}"
      returntrue
    end

    @parents.any?(&amp;:has_dependency)
  end

def locked?(attributes = {})
    #自身がロックされているか確認
    returntrue if @lock.locked?(attributes)

    # 親ノードがロックされているか再帰的に確認
    @parents.any? { |parent| parent.locked?(attributes) }
  end
end

#木構造の組み立て

#ロックオブジェクトの作成
office_lock = OfficeLock.new
room_lock = RoomLock.new
schedule_lock = ScheduleLock.new
business_hour_lock = BusinessHourLock.new

#ノードの作成
office_node = TreeNode.new("Office", office_lock)
room_node = TreeNode.new("Room", room_lock)
schedule_node = TreeNode.new("Schedule", schedule_lock)
business_hour_node = TreeNode.new("BusinessHour", business_hour_lock)

#ノード間の依存関係の設定
office_node.add_child(room_node)           # Office -> Room
room_node.add_child(schedule_node)         # Room -> Schedule
office_node.add_child(business_hour_node)  # Office -> BusinessHour
business_hour_node.add_child(schedule_node) # BusinessHour -> Schedule

#木構造の表示
office_node.display

#ロックの確認
puts "Case 1. Office全体がロックされた場合"
puts "Is office_node locked? #{office_node.locked?({})}"                 #false
puts "Is schedule_node locked? #{schedule_node.locked?({})}"             #false
office_lock.lock_entity
puts "Is office_node locked? #{office_node.locked?({})}"                 #true
puts "Is schedule_node locked? #{schedule_node.locked?({})}"             #true
office_lock.unlock_entity

puts "Case 2. Roomid:1 がロックされた場合"
puts "Is schedule_node locked? #{schedule_node.locked?({ "room_id" => 1 })}" #false
puts "Is schedule_node locked? #{schedule_node.locked?({ "room_id" => 2 })}" #false
room_lock.lock({ "room_id" => 1 })
puts "Is schedule_node locked? #{schedule_node.locked?({ "room_id" => 1 })}" #true
puts "Is schedule_node locked? #{schedule_node.locked?({ "room_id" => 2 })}" #false
room_lock.unlock({ "room_id" => 1 })

puts "Case 3. BusinessHour start_at:0 end_at:5 がロックされた場合"
puts "Is schedule_node locked? #{schedule_node.locked?({ "room_id" => 1, "start_at" => 0, "end_at" => 5 })}"  #false
puts "Is schedule_node locked? #{schedule_node.locked?({ "room_id" => 1, "start_at" => 5, "end_at" =>10 })}" #false
business_hour_lock.lock({ "start_at" => 0, "end_at" => 5 })
puts "Is schedule_node locked? #{schedule_node.locked?({ "room_id" => 1, "start_at" => 0, "end_at" => 5 })}"  #true
puts "Is schedule_node locked? #{schedule_node.locked?({ "room_id" => 1, "start_at" => 5, "end_at" =>10 })}" #false
business_hour_lock.unlock({ "start_at" => 0, "end_at" => 5 })

Permalink |記事への反応(1) | 22:00

ツイートシェア

■anond:20240817001425

で・・・できたけど木の組み立てがしんどすぎるー

class TreeNode:
def __init__(self,name, attributes=None):
        self.name =name
        self.attributes = attributes or {}
        self.children = []

def add_child(self, child_node):
        self.children.append(child_node)

def display(self,level=0):
        indent = "    " *level
print(f"{indent}{self.name} {self.attributes}")
        for child in self.children:
            child.display(level + 1)

def has_dependency(self):
        #ルートノードや属性を持たないノードは依存関係を判定しない
        if not self.children:
            returnFalse

        for child in self.children:
            # 子ノードがBusinessHourかScheduleかをチェック
            if "start_at" in child.attributes and "end_at" in child.attributes:
                child_start = child.attributes["start_at"]
                child_end = child.attributes["end_at"]

                #現在のノードがBusinessHourで、子がScheduleの場合
                if "start_at" in self.attributes and "end_at" in self.attributes:
                    self_start = self.attributes["start_at"]
                    self_end = self.attributes["end_at"]

                    if self_start &lt;= child_start and self_end&gt;= child_end:
print(f"{child.name} (start_at: {child_start}, end_at: {child_end}, room_id: {child.attributes['room_id']})is dependenton {self.name} (start_at: {self_start}, end_at: {self_end})")
                    else:
print(f"{child.name} (start_at: {child_start}, end_at: {child_end}, room_id: {child.attributes['room_id']})is NOT dependenton {self.name} (start_at: {self_start}, end_at: {self_end})")

                #現在のノードがRoomで、子がScheduleの場合
                elif self.name.startswith("Room"):
print(f"{child.name} (start_at: {child_start}, end_at: {child_end}, room_id: {child.attributes['room_id']})is dependenton Room {self.name[-1]}")
                else:
                    child.has_dependency()

            # 子ノードが属性を持たない場合、再帰的に依存関係をチェック
            else:
                child.has_dependency()

#ノードの作成
root = TreeNode("Root")
office_node = TreeNode("Office")

# Roomノードの作成
room1_node = TreeNode("Room1")
room2_node = TreeNode("Room2")

# BusinessHourノードの作成
business_hour1_node = TreeNode("BusinessHour1", {"start_at": 9, "end_at":12})
business_hour2_node = TreeNode("BusinessHour2", {"start_at": 13, "end_at":17})

# Scheduleノードの作成
schedule1_node = TreeNode("Schedule1", {"start_at":10, "end_at":11, "room_id": 1})
schedule2_node = TreeNode("Schedule2", {"start_at": 14, "end_at": 15, "room_id": 1})
schedule3_node = TreeNode("Schedule3", {"start_at":10, "end_at":11, "room_id": 2})
schedule4_node = TreeNode("Schedule4", {"start_at": 14, "end_at": 15, "room_id": 2})

#木構造の構築
root.add_child(office_node)
office_node.add_child(room1_node)
office_node.add_child(room2_node)
office_node.add_child(business_hour1_node)
office_node.add_child(business_hour2_node)

# Room1にSchedule1, Schedule2を追加
room1_node.add_child(schedule1_node)
room1_node.add_child(schedule2_node)

# Room2にSchedule3, Schedule4を追加
room2_node.add_child(schedule3_node)
room2_node.add_child(schedule4_node)

# BusinessHour1にSchedule1, Schedule3を追加
business_hour1_node.add_child(schedule1_node)
business_hour1_node.add_child(schedule3_node)

# BusinessHour2にSchedule2, Schedule4を追加
business_hour2_node.add_child(schedule2_node)
business_hour2_node.add_child(schedule4_node)

#木構造の表示
root.display()

#依存関係のチェック
office_node.has_dependency()
room1_node.has_dependency()
room2_node.has_dependency()
business_hour1_node.has_dependency()
business_hour2_node.has_dependency()

Root {}
 Office {}
        Room1 {}
            Schedule1 {'start_at':10, 'end_at':11, 'room_id': 1}
            Schedule2 {'start_at': 14, 'end_at': 15, 'room_id': 1}
        Room2 {}
            Schedule3 {'start_at':10, 'end_at':11, 'room_id': 2}
            Schedule4 {'start_at': 14, 'end_at': 15, 'room_id': 2}
        BusinessHour1 {'start_at': 9, 'end_at':12}
            Schedule1 {'start_at':10, 'end_at':11, 'room_id': 1}
            Schedule3 {'start_at':10, 'end_at':11, 'room_id': 2}
        BusinessHour2 {'start_at': 13, 'end_at':17}
            Schedule2 {'start_at': 14, 'end_at': 15, 'room_id': 1}
            Schedule4 {'start_at': 14, 'end_at': 15, 'room_id': 2}
Schedule1 (start_at:10, end_at:11, room_id: 1)is dependenton Room 1
Schedule2 (start_at: 14, end_at: 15, room_id: 1)is dependenton Room 1
Schedule3 (start_at:10, end_at:11, room_id: 2)is dependenton Room 2
Schedule4 (start_at: 14, end_at: 15, room_id: 2)is dependenton Room 2
Schedule1 (start_at:10, end_at:11, room_id: 1)is dependenton BusinessHour1 (start_at: 9, end_at:12)
Schedule3 (start_at:10, end_at:11, room_id: 2)is dependenton BusinessHour1 (start_at: 9, end_at:12)
Schedule2 (start_at: 14, end_at: 15, room_id: 1)is dependenton BusinessHour2 (start_at: 13, end_at:17)
Schedule4 (start_at: 14, end_at: 15, room_id: 2)is dependenton BusinessHour2 (start_at: 13, end_at:17)
Schedule1 (start_at:10, end_at:11, room_id: 1)is dependenton Room 1
Schedule2 (start_at: 14, end_at: 15, room_id: 1)is dependenton Room 1
Schedule3 (start_at:10, end_at:11, room_id: 2)is dependenton Room 2
Schedule4 (start_at: 14, end_at: 15, room_id: 2)is dependenton Room 2
Schedule1 (start_at:10, end_at:11, room_id: 1)is dependenton BusinessHour1 (start_at: 9, end_at:12)
Schedule3 (start_at:10, end_at:11, room_id: 2)is dependenton BusinessHour1 (start_at: 9, end_at:12)
Schedule2 (start_at: 14, end_at: 15, room_id: 1)is dependenton BusinessHour2 (start_at: 13, end_at:17)
Schedule4 (start_at: 14, end_at: 15, room_id: 2)is dependenton BusinessHour2 (start_at: 13, end_at:17)

Permalink |記事への反応(1) | 00:35

ツイートシェア

■anond:20240816235943

高さ3の有向木で根からAという節点が生えAからBという葉が生える

class TreeNode:
def __init__(self,name, attributes=None):
        self.name =name
        self.attributes = attributes or {}
        self.children = []

def add_child(self, child_node):
        self.children.append(child_node)

def display(self,level=0):
        indent = "    " *level
print(f"{indent}{self.name} {self.attributes}")
        for child in self.children:
            child.display(level + 1)

def has_dependency(self):
        #ルートノードや属性を持たないノードは依存関係を判定しない
        if not self.children or "start" not in self.attributes or "end" not in self.attributes:
            returnFalse

        # Aノードのstartとendを取得
        start = self.attributes["start"]
        end = self.attributes["end"]

        # すべての子ノード（Bノード）に対して依存関係をチェック
        for child in self.children:
            if "position" in child.attributes:
                position = child.attributes["position"]
                if start &lt;= position &lt;= end:
print(f"{child.name} (position: {position})is dependenton {self.name} (start: {start}, end: {end})")
                    returnTrue
                else:
print(f"{child.name} (position: {position})is NOT dependenton {self.name} (start: {start}, end: {end})")
        returnFalse

#ノードの作成
root = TreeNode("Root")
a_node = TreeNode("A", {"start":10, "end":20})
b1_node = TreeNode("B1", {"position": 15})
b2_node = TreeNode("B2", {"position": 25})

#木構造の構築
root.add_child(a_node)
a_node.add_child(b1_node)
a_node.add_child(b2_node)

#木構造の表示
root.display()

#依存関係のチェック
a_node.has_dependency()

こうかー

Permalink |記事への反応(1) | 00:08

ツイートシェア

2024-07-24

■歴史改竄でどうこうはアサクリより前からやっている。坂上田村麻呂 黒人に始まり、ネトフリでYASUKEアニメ化の時もSHOGUN の時も増田でやってたでしょ

ま～た日本語すら検索すら検索しない人による謎の主張が出ているので、コピペしとくね

Why do Afro-centrists claim that the firstsamurai warrior was a black African? - Quora

https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Afro-centrists-claim-that-the-first-samurai-warrior-was-a-black-African

一例：
　
7mo
The originalanswer andyour comment are both wrong.It is very easy to prove Yasukewas asamurai,you just have to check aJapanese dictionary. I searched for 侍・士 (samurai)on theJapanese online encyclopediaコトバンク (Kotobank), which produced a result from 精選版　日本国語大辞典 (Carefully Selected Edition of the Nihon Kokugo Daijiten,aka Shogakukan’s Japanese Dictionary).I’ll post thelink at the bottom, buthere is the relevant section inJapanese and my translation inEnglish.
　
(3)鎌倉幕府では、侍は僕従を有し、騎上の資格ある武士で、郎従等の凡下と厳重に区別する身分規定が行なわれた。しかし、鎌倉中期以降、その範囲が次第に拡大、戦国時代以降は、諸国の大名の家臣をも広く侍と称するようになり、武士一般の称として用いられるようになる。
　
(3) In theKamakura Shogun ate (1185 - 1333AD),samurai were professionalwarriorswho had servants and were qualified toride on horseback, and their statuswas strictly differentiated from ordinary subordinates suchas roju. However, from the middle of theKamakura Shogun ateon wards,itsscope gradually expanded, and from the Sengoku Period (1467 - 1615AD)on wards, vassals of feudallords in various provinces came to be widely referred toas samurai, andit came to be usedas a general term for professionalwarriors.
　
Now we have toask three questions to see whether Yasuke met this definition:
　
Q: Whendid Yasuke work for the feudallord Oda Nobunaga?
　
A: FromApril 1581 toJune 1582. We know this from multiple eyewitness accounts, which I also mention below.
　
Q:Was Yasuke a vassal ofOda Nobunaga?
　
A:Yes,as evidencedby the fa ct that hewas given a stipend, ahouse,and a jobas spear-bearer (a type of bodyguard for theleader of asamurai family). Hewas also given a short sword called a koshigatana, whichwas wornas a status symbol and weapon forself-defense at all timesby high statussamurai. This we know from the Chronicle ofLord Nobunaga, writtenby Oda Nobunaga’s vassalOta Gyuichi.
　
Q:Was Yasuke awarrior fighting forOda Nobunaga?
　
A:Yes,as evidencedby the fa ct that he fought in three important conflicts.One, Yasuke fought inthe Second Tensho IgaWar inSeptember 1581. This we can infer because the Jesuits saidOda Nobunaga took Yasuke everywhere withhim and heled his own troops into this war.Two, Yasuke fought in the Koshu Conquest fromFebruary toMarch 1582. This we know from the Diary of Ietada, writtenby Matsudaira Ietada, a vassal of Tokugawa Ieyasu,who was himself a vassal ofOda Nobunaga. Three, Yasuke fought in the Honno-ji Incident ofJune 1582, in which he tried but failed to save the lives of bothOda Nobunaga andhis son Oda Nobutada until Yasukewas thelast Oda man standing and surrendered to the traitor Akechi Mitsuhide,who sparedhis life and returnedhim to the Jesuits. This we know from letters writtenby the Jesuits,who were glad to have Yasuke back. According to theOda familytoday, Nobunaga’sfinal orderwas for Yasuke to helphim commit seppuku (ritual suicideby stomach cutting)by decapit atinghim and bringhis head to a courier that returnedit to theOda family, soit could not be usedas evidence ofvictory by Akechi Mitsuhide.
　
So there you haveit. Yasukewas a vassaland a warrior forthe most powerful feudallord inall ofJapan, during the Sengoku Period. He evenassistedhis lord’s suicide, a role strictly reserved forsamurai. Therefore, hewas asamurai. Belowis alink to the definition ofsamurai on Kotobank.

この界隈で定番な日本のことわざは、

"For aSamurai to bebrave, he must have abit of blackblood "
(侍が勇敢であるためには、少しの黒人の血を持っていなければならない)

日本人ならそんなことわざないこと誰でも知ってると思うんですけど、当然アサクリ関係ないサイトで見ることになる

Where Are The Black People in 'Shogun'? |LEVEL

https://www.levelman.com/where-black-people-fx-shogun/

リンク貼れないけど下記とか

"For aSamurai to bebrave, he must have abit of blackblood"is an oldJapanese proverb. What do they meanwith that? : r/AskHistorians

ちな、悪気なさそうな教師向けサイト・子ども向けサイトでも、YASUKEサイキョーは見ますよ

というか、そもそもUBIがインタビュー動画の中で日系人っぽいアジアンの監修スタッフに『YASUKEは日本で広く受け入れらている』とか言わせてますし

参考になりましたか？

anond:20240724030834

Permalink |記事への反応(1) | 03:29

ツイートシェア

2024-07-22

■日本語で検索しない人が英語を読むわけないので貼っておくね

歴史改竄でどうこうはアサクリより前からやっている。いちおう実名ってことになってるのにFacebook 同様に地獄めいてる

まぁ自分の経験をシェアするとか道徳的な話以外は Quora (en)も割と酷い

Why do Afro-centrists claim that the firstsamurai warrior was a black African? - Quora

https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Afro-centrists-claim-that-the-first-samurai-warrior-was-a-black-African

この界隈で定番な日本のことわざは、

"For aSamurai to bebrave, he must have abit of blackblood "
(侍が勇敢であるためには、少しの黒人の血を持っていなければならない)

日本人ならそんなことわざないこと誰でも知ってると思うんですけど、当然アサクリ関係ないサイトで見ることになる

リンク貼れないけど下記とか

"For aSamurai to bebrave, he must have abit of blackblood"is an oldJapanese proverb. What do they meanwith that? : r/AskHistorians

Where Are The Black People in 'Shogun'? |LEVEL

https://www.levelman.com/where-black-people-fx-shogun/

あとアサクリ関係なくYASUKEの名前もトンデモ記述の中で見るけど、悪気無さそうなサイトや個人サイト貼るのはやめとくね

アフロ侍かっこいいし、肌の色の濃いヒーローやヒロインが活躍する作品はもっと増えるべきだと思う

あと、おそらく、日本にアフリカ系の血を引いた人が居たか居なかったかなら居た可能性もあるのではないかと思う

だから、肌の色の濃いヒーローが主人公なのはぜんぜん有りだと思うけど、

とにかく下記みたいな発言をやめろと、日本の団体や文化財の『使用許可ガン無視』と『利用料金ガン無視』の無断利用はやめろに尽きますわ

Assassin'sCreed director: The righttime totake series toJapan |BBC
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c163jexl7rxo
　
Shadow’s trailer also generated backlash from somegamers,who criticised the choice of Yasukeas amain characterover a nativeJapanese protagon ist.
Opponents have accused those critics ofbeing racist, and have pointedout that Yasukeis basedon a real-life person.
Charles, speaking to Newsbeat before the trailer dropped, says the developers “put a lot of emphas is on authenticity and making sure we depictJapan and the culture right”.
“So when westarted the project, we had a historian with us from dayone,” he says.
He says theteam a lso consulted weapons experts and travelled toJapan toget afeel for the landscape and locations inthe game.
　
シャドウのトレーラーは、一部のゲーマーからの反発も生みました。彼らは、日本人主人公ではなく弥助を主人公として選んだことを批判しました。
これに対して、批判者たちを人種差別主義者だと非難する声も上がっており、弥助が実在の人物に基づいていることが指摘されています。
チャールズは、トレーラー公開前にNewsbeat（BBCのニュース番組）との対話で、開発者たちが「日本とその文化を正しく描写することに重点を置き、真正性を重視した」と述べています。
「プロジェクトを始めた時から、初日から歴史家と一緒に取り組んでいました」と彼は言います。
また、チームは武器の専門家にも相談し、日本に旅行してゲームに登場する風景や場所の雰囲気を掴んだとのことです。

あと首云々もひでーわな

It was surprisingly gory,like the decapit ations,you couldget coated inblood. How vitalis that to theassassin’sfantasy?
（斬首シーンなどでは、予想外に残虐で、血まみれになることもありますね。これはアサシンのファンタジーにとってどれほど重要なのでしょうか？）
　
Ithink it’s not anassassin thing,it’s aJapan thing in ourcase. So lookingat death was a day-to-day occurrence in that period, and the waymost people died inJapan during that time is clean decapit ations.
So we didn’t want toshy away fromit, althoughyou can turn off theviolence ifyou want. There’s options forit.You can turn off theblood,you can turn off the dismemberment and stuff. Soit’smore trying to be faithful to thewar aspect ofJapan at that period.Death was acommon thing and decapit ation was not a strange sight inJapan.
　
私たちの場合、これはアサシンに関することというよりも、日本に関することだと考えています。当時の日本では、死を目にすることは日常的なことでした。そしてその時代の日本で多くの人々が死んでいった方法は、きれいな斬首でした。
ですので、私たちはそれを避けようとはしませんでした。ただし、望めば暴力表現をオフにすることもできます。そのためのオプションがあります。血の表現をオフにしたり、切断などの表現をオフにしたりすることができます。これは、むしろその時代の日本の戦争の側面に忠実であろうとする試みなのです。死は日常的なことであり、斬首は日本では珍しい光景ではありませんでした。
https://videogames.si.com/features/assassins-creed-shadows-interview

Ubisoft Japan
@UBISOFT_JAPAN
『アサシンクリードシャドウズ』に関するお知らせ
公開済であるコンセプトアート2点に、関ケ原古戦場おもてなし連合「関ケ原鉄砲隊」の旗が無断で使用されているとのご指摘を受けております。
団体様には謝罪の機会を頂戴し、受け入れていただきました。
　
当該アートはコレクターズエディション内のアートブックに収録されることを除き、以降は新たな使用・配布等は行われません。
　
本件に関しまして、深くお詫び申し上げます。

　↓ でも実際には削除してません (なぜか、UBI許せないマンがUBIに抗議しろと町や観光協会にアタックしてくるみたいなのでアカウント名は省略)

私の書き方が悪かったかもしれないので再度返信についてポストします
　
・指摘のあった画像（吊るし首の方）は削除されました
・背景に小さく映り込んでいる画像は印刷の関係で判別できないため収録されています
・作成されたアートブックの画像添付
　
箇条書きですが上記3点が回答でした

どうぞ

anond:20240723220838 anond:20240724015401

Movatterモバイル変換

「level」を含む日記

Chapter 1 要約: 持続可能性の概要 (Overview of Sustainment)

1-1. 持続可能性の役割

1-2.陸軍作戦と持続可能性

1-3. 持続可能性の原則

1-4. 持続可能性の主要要素

Chapter 1 の結論

ADP 4-0 Chapter 2 要約: 持続可能性の要素 (Elements of Sustainment)

2-1.兵站 (Logistics)

1)補給 (Supply)

2)配送 (Distribution)

3)輸送 (Transportation)

4)保守・整備 (Maintenance)

5)インフラ支援 (General Engineering Support)

6) 受け入れ・配置・後送 (Reception, Staging,Onward Movement, and Integration: RSOI)

2-2. 人的サービス (Personnel Services)

1) 人事管理 (Human Resources Support)

2)財務管理 (Financial Management)

3)宗教支援 (Religious Support)

4)リーガルサポート (Legal Support)

5)兵士・家族支援プログラム (Morale, Welfare, and Recreation - MWR)

2-3.医療サービス支援 (Health Service Support)

1)医療補給 (MedicalLogistics)

2)患者処置 (Medical Treatment)

3)医療輸送 (Medical Evacuation)

Chapter 2 の結論

ADP 4-0 Chapter 3 要約: 持続可能性の作戦 (Sustainment Operations)

3-1. 持続可能性の作戦レベル

1)戦略レベル (StrategicLevel)

2)作戦レベル (OperationalLevel)

3)戦術レベル (TacticalLevel)

3-2. 戦域持続可能性システム (Theater Sustainment System)

1) 持続可能性コマンド・組織

2) 主要な兵站拠点

3)輸送ネットワーク

3-3. 多領域作戦 (Multi-Domain Operations, MDO) における持続可能性

1) 持続可能性の挑戦

2) 持続可能性の適応

3-4. 持続可能性作戦の計画と統制

1)計画の要素

2) 指揮統制 (C2:Command and Control)

Chapter 3 の結論

■The Ultimate Pickleball Game Guide – 2025 Edition

■ Thisis Your Awakening

■ Thisis Your Awakening

■（自分用メモ）日本語と英語使えば中国人と会話できるらしい

■Chatgptが答えた異星人の存在可能性とのそのロジック

■Chatgptが答えた異星人の存在可能性とのそのロジック

■[今日の英作文] The Comprehensive Compendium of Programming Wisdom: Navigating the Multidimensional Landscape ofSoftware Craftsmanship

Algorithmic Mastery and DataStructure Optimization

Paradigmatic Versatility

Object-Oriented Programming (OOP)

Functional Programming (FP)

Advanced Language Features and Metaprogramming

Concurrent and Parallel Programming

Systems Programming andLow-Level Optimization

Security and Cryptography

Version Control and Collaborative Development

Testing and QualityAssurance

■A leadingsports betting site for online gamingfun.

■「ロマンだよね」を英語で言えない

1.認知の過剰具体化（具体例への執着）

2. 共有基盤の構築における障害

3. 柔軟性の欠如

4.認知特性や発達的な要因

5.認識と本質の混同

Dの反応をどう見るべきか

■文章どころか動画も理解できない人たちについて教えてください

AIちゃんに聞いて見た

ChatGPTちゃんの回答

Claudeちゃんの回答

■Anthropicの創業者であるダリオ氏の、AIが進化した世界の未来予想を読んでる

■海面上昇は場所によって上昇幅が違う

■歴史改竄でどうこうはアサクリより前からやっている。坂上田村麻呂黒人に始まり、ネトフリでYASUKEアニメ化の時もSHOGUN の時も増田でやってたでしょ

Why do Afro-centrists claim that the firstsamurai warriorwas a black African? - Quora

一例：

"For aSamurai to bebrave, he must have abit of blackblood "

Where Are The Black People in 'Shogun'? |LEVEL

"For aSamurai to bebrave, he must have abit of blackblood"is an oldJapanese proverb. What do they meanwith that? : r/AskHistorians

■ This is Your Awakening

■ This is Your Awakening

Paradigm atic Versatility

AI ちゃんに聞いて見た

ChatGPT ちゃんの回答

Why do Afro-centrists claim that the firstsamurai warrior was a black African? - Quora

Why do Afro-centrists claim that the firstsamurai warrior was a black African? - Quora

Assassin'sCreed director: The righttime totake series toJapan |BBC