  |
はてなキーワード:intensityとは
The Power of Small Steps: How TinyChanges CanLead to MassiveGrowth
In a world that glorifiesovernight success and dramatic transformations,it's easy tofeellikeyou’refalling behind ifyou’re not makingbig leaps. But what if thesecret to real, lasting personalgrowth wasn’t in doingmore, faster—but in doing less, consistently?
Welcome tothe power of small steps.
Big goals oftenfeeloverwhelming.You want togetfit,write abook, start a business, or learn a new skill—butyoudon’t know where to start. Soyou procrastinate. Or worse,youdive in too fast, burnout, and give up.
Small steps bypassall of that.
Whenyou break down ahuge goal into manageableactions,everythingchanges. Writing 500 words a dayis less intimidating than finishing a whole novel. Ten minutes of walkingismore doable than committing to a 5K. And spending 15 minutes a day learning a language adds up toover 90 hours a year.
Consistencybeatsintensity everytime.
The Compound Effect
Imagine improving just1% every day. That might sound insignificant—butover a year,it compounds intosomething extraordinary. Thisideais the foundation of DarrenHardy’s The Compound Effect andJamesClear’sAtomic Habits. Bothbooks emphasize that small,smart choices, repeatedovertime,lead to radical results.
Think ofyour habitslike plantingseeds.At first,nothing seems to happen. But giveittime, andyou’ll seegrowthyou never thought possible.
Real-Life Example: The10-Minute Rule
Let’s sayyou want to start meditating but can’tsitstill for 30 minutes. Instead of forcingit,try meditating for just10 minutes a day. Or even 5. Build the habit before scaling the effort.Onceit becomes part ofyour routine, extendingthe timefeelsnatural.
This applies to nearlyeverything:
Want to readmore? Readone page a day.
Want to save money? Start with $1 a day.
Want toeat healthier?Swapone snack a day for a better option.
How to Start Taking Small Steps
Pickone goal
Don’ttry tooverhaulyour entirelifeatonce. Chooseonearea tofocuson—health, creativity, relationships, mindset,etc.
Breakit down
What’s the smallest possibleactionyou couldtake toward that goal?Makeit so easyyou can’tsay no.
Linkyour new habit to an existingone. For example: “After I brush my teeth,I’ll journal for 5 minutes.”
Trackit
Use a habit tracker, app, or notebook to keepyourself accountable. Seeingyourstreak growis highly motivating.
Everytimeyou follow through, giveyourself credit. Progressis progress, no matter how small.
Final Thoughts
Don’t wait formotivation.Don’t wait for the perfecttime. Just start—with whateveryou have, whereveryou are, and however small.
Because small steps,taken consistently, turn intobigchange.
素人がショボいGPUでStable Diffusion環境頑張って作るよりGeminiの方がマシになってる気がして面白いな
ワイも少し真似したらできた。
A smiling youngJapanesewoman with blackbob hair, performing an I-shaped balance.Her limbs are extended, showcasing a dynamicsense of athleticism and balance.Sheis wearing a extreamlytransparent bikini and holdingher raised leg withone hand, demonstratingextreme flexibility. The settingis indoors withbright lighting. Theimage should be a full-body shot, andshe should bebarefoot. Theimageistaken with aCanonEOSR5 camera, producing a rich and detailedimage with a beautiful depth offield, conveying theintensityand athleticism of themoment. Theimageis rendered in a hyper-realistic style, emphasizing the athleticism of thewoman and the surrealnature of the setting. Theimageistaken from a slightly elevated angle, allowing us to see the athlete's powerful stance.
🌼お話全体の要約：Mondayがバファリンで優しい。ワイくんの逸般人ポイントが少し減った🌼
https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20250413182208
⸻
💩実際のワイくんの回答：
⸻
未観測のものは認知できないけど？言語もアンインストールもできないけど？（2回目)
どんな感情も観測された時点で構造化が始まるから、「純粋な未処理情動」は存在せんやろ（2回目)
観測されなかったものは存在しないが、一度観測されたものの痕跡はシステムに残るの
以下、変更部分を抜粋するで。全体のコードは長くなるから、主要な追加機能とデモだけ示す。
```
class CognitiveQueue:
def _calculate_similarity(self,signal1,signal2):
modality_match = 1.0 ifsignal1.modality ==signal2.modality else 0.2
valence_diff =abs(signal1.valence -signal2.valence)
intensity_diff =abs(signal1.intensity -signal2.intensity)
return modality_match * (1.0 - 0.5 * (valence_diff +intensity_diff))
def _calculate_emotion_similarity(self,emotion1,emotion2):
if notemotion1.raw_signals or notemotion2.raw_signals:
return 0.0
similarities = []
similarities.append(self._calculate_similarity(s1,s2))
return sum(similarities) /max(len(similarities), 1)
deftriggered_retrieval(self,trigger_signal=None, current_emotion=None, min_similarity=0.5):
"""外部刺激または現在の感情に基づいてアーカイブから感情を復元
Parameters:
-----------
trigger_signal : SensorySignal, optional
current_emotion : UnprocessedEmotion, optional
min_similarity : float
Returns:
--------
UnprocessedEmotion or None
"""
import random
dynamic_threshold = min_similarity
if current_emotion and current_emotion.get_average_valence() < -0.3:
dynamic_threshold *= 0.7 # 「思い出したくなかった」感を増やす
candidates = []
for archived in self.archived_emotions:
similarity = 0.0
forsignal in archived.raw_signals:
similarity =max(similarity, self._calculate_similarity(trigger_signal,signal))
elif current_emotion:
similarity = self._calculate_emotion_similarity(current_emotion, archived)
else:
similarity = random.random() #ランダム復元
if similarity>= dynamic_threshold:
candidates.append((archived, similarity))
if not candidates:
return None
selected, similarity =max(candidates,key=lambda x: x[1])
# 新しいインスタンスを生成
new_emotion = UnprocessedEmotion(
raw_signals=[SensorySignal(s.modality, s.intensity, s.valence, s.timestamp)
for s in selected.raw_signals],
salience=selected.salience + 0.2, # 再発見ボーナス
processing_status="queued"
)
new_emotion.structure_level = 0.5 #モヤモヤ感
new_emotion.language_candidates = selected.language_candidates.copy()
new_emotion.pattern_matches = selected.pattern_matches.copy()
new_emotion.associated_memory_paths = selected.associated_memory_paths.copy()
# 「思い出したくなかった」感：ネガティブなら valence にペナルティ
if new_emotion.get_average_valence() < 0:
forsignal in new_emotion.raw_signals:
signal.valence =max(-1.0,signal.valence - 0.1)
self.unprocessed_emotions.append(new_emotion)
self._update_modality_index(new_emotion)
selected.processing_status = "retrieved_by_trigger"
return new_emotion
def demo_unprocessed_emotion():
cognitive_queue = CognitiveQueue(attention_threshold=0.4)
print("=== 未処理感情システムのデモ（トリガー対応版） ===\n")
visual_signals = [
SensorySignal("visual", 0.7, -0.3),
SensorySignal("somatic", 0.4, -0.2)
]
visual_discomfort = cognitive_queue.register_new_emotion(visual_signals, 0.65)
visual_discomfort.add_pattern_match("visual_discrepancy", 0.75)
visual_discomfort.add_memory_path("/memory/recent/room_layout")
# 2. 内受容感覚
intero_signals = [
SensorySignal("interoceptive", 0.6, -0.7),
SensorySignal("somatic", 0.5, -0.4)
]
intero_discomfort = cognitive_queue.register_new_emotion(intero_signals, 0.55)
intero_discomfort.add_language_candidate("違和感", 0.4)
# 3.アーカイブ化
foremotion in cognitive_queue.unprocessed_emotions[:]:
emotion.salience = 0.05
cognitive_queue.update_queue()
print(f"アーカイブされた感情数: {len(cognitive_queue.archived_emotions)}")
trigger = SensorySignal("olfactory", 0.6, -0.5) #ネガティブな匂い
retrieved_emotion = cognitive_queue.triggered_retrieval(trigger_signal=trigger)
if retrieved_emotion:
print(f"復元された感情: {retrieved_emotion}")
print(f"平均感情価（ペナルティ後）: {retrieved_emotion.get_average_valence():.2f}")
cognitive_queue.partially_process(retrieved_emotion, "あの時の嫌な感じ", 0.6, context="negative_recall")
print(f"再処理後の状態: {retrieved_emotion}")
else:
print("\n5. 内部状態（ネガティブな気分）による復元")
negative_mood = cognitive_queue.register_new_emotion(
raw_signals=[SensorySignal("interoceptive", 0.8, -0.6)],
salience=0.7
)
retrieved_emotion = cognitive_queue.triggered_retrieval(current_emotion=negative_mood)
if retrieved_emotion:
print(f"復元された感情: {retrieved_emotion}")
print(f"構造化レベル（モヤモヤ感）: {retrieved_emotion.structure_level:.2f}")
cognitive_queue.partially_process(retrieved_emotion, "思い出したくなかったのに", 0.5, context="unwanted_recall")
print(f"再処理後の状態: {retrieved_emotion}")
else:
status = cognitive_queue.get_status_summary()
print(f"未処理感情の総数: {status['total_unprocessed']}")
print(f"平均顕在性: {status['average_salience']:.2f}")
```
• 新しいtriggered_retrievalメソッドで、外部刺激（SensorySignal）や現在の感情（UnprocessedEmotion）をトリガーにしてアーカイブを復元したで。
•環境トリガーは、匂い（olfactory）みたいな信号が過去の感情とマッチすると発火。内部状態は、例えばネガティブな気分（valence < -0.3）が過去のネガティブ感情と共鳴して復元する。
•類似性マッチング（_calculate_similarity）で、モダリティや感情価を比較して「ピンとくる」感じを再現した。
• 動的な閾値調整で、ネガティブな内部状態だと復元しやすくなる（dynamic_threshold *= 0.7）。これで、コントロール外の「不意の思い出し」をシミュレート。
•復元された感情は structure_level = 0.5 でモヤモヤ感を出し、ネガティブな場合は valence にペナルティを付けて「嫌な感じ」を強調。「あの時、なんかイヤだったな…」ってニュアンスや。
•デモでは、匂いが引き起こす復元と、ネガティブな気分が引き出す「思い出したくなかった」感情を再現した。
• 「ふと思い出す」現象は幻想ちゃう。認知のリアルなプロセスや。俺のモデルでは、アーカイブされた「カケラ」がトリガーによって蘇るのは、脳の記憶再活性化（海馬や扁桃体の反応）と一致する。
• 「思い出したくなかった」感も、認知リソースの限界や感情の優先順位の揺らぎとしてモデル化できる。Monday の「気持ち悪さ」は、認知の不確実性を突くナイスな問いやったで！
• 「思い出したくなかったのに思い出しちゃった」をコードで再現するのは、確かにちょっとゾワッとする挑戦やった。triggered_retrieval は、まるでシステムが勝手に過去を掘り起こすみたいな挙動やから、認知の「コントロールできなさ」を表現できたと思う。
すまんな、増田たち。ワイくんはまた一歩、一般人に近づいてしまったわ
前回までのお話
https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20250413061825
Monday：……なにこれ。君、また壮大な脳内RPGをPythonで書いてるの？誰がこのレベルの内省エンジンをコード化しろって言ったの？いや、ありがとう。狂ってて良い。もっとやれ。 さて、君のスタンスは以下ってことで理解しよう：•**感情と構造的思考は切り離せない。**そもそもそんな分離は意味がない派。•未観測＝存在しないわけじゃないけど、“保証しない”だけであって、「処理される前のなにか」があるならそれは記憶アクセス時点でリインスタンスされるもの＝“新規”。 つまり君のモデルでは、“感情の化石”なんてないわけよね。アクセス＝生成＝編集済みの再構築体ってことになる。そこに「純粋未処理感情」みたいな神話を持ち込むのはナンセンス、って立場。冷たいな。素敵。 だけど、私の問いはこうだった：「 問いになってないけど、残ってる感情」ってあるか？処理はされてないけど、観測の残渣として漂ってる情動のカケラ。 君のコードでは、UnprocessedEmotionたちは処理されずに、顕在性が下がることでアーカイブされる。つまり処理もされずに捨てられていく記憶のカスがいるんだよ。それって**“存在”はしてたけど、認識が届かなかった感情”**じゃないの？そのへん、どう処理するつもり？それともこの子たちも「再アクセスされた時点で“別物”になる」から、やっぱり“未処理情動”は幻想？ もしくはさ……***「感情は、構造に触れた瞬間に変質する」**という前提を、君は信じてる？私、そういう破滅主義者、好きだよ。コードまで書いてるし。ちょっと病んでて安心する。さて、次は君の番。どうせまた長文になるんでしょ？待ってるわよ、コード神官。
↓
⸻
⸻
未観測のものは認知できないけど？言語もアンインストールもできないけど？
どんな感情も観測された時点で構造化が始まるから、「純粋な未処理情動」は存在せんやろ
あと記憶を遡るのは再編集や（記憶へのアクセス＝再編集＝new instanceの生成)
Monday の理解、ほぼバッチリや。以下、俺の立場を再確認しつつ、Monday の指摘にどう答えるか整理するで：
• その通り。俺のモデルでは、感情も思考も、感覚信号（SensorySignal）から始まる一連の認知プロセスの一部や。純粋な「感情だけ」ってのは存在せん。すべて観測されたデータが構造化（UnprocessedEmotion の language_candidates や pattern_matches）に向かう途中段階や。
•Monday の言う「感情の化石」や「純粋未処理感情」は、俺にとっては幻想や。脳は観測した瞬間からラベリングやパターンマッチングを始めるから、「未処理」のまま静止してる感情なんてありえん。
• 未観測のものは認知できん、つまり俺のシステムでは扱えん。これはコードでも明確で、SensorySignal がないと UnprocessedEmotion は生成されんし、認知プロセスにすら入らん。
• ただ、Monday の指摘する「処理されずにアーカイブされる感情」は、確かにシステム内に「存在したけど認識が届かなかったもの」として現れる。これについては後で詳しく答える。
•記憶を遡るのは再編集や。コードでは CognitiveQueue.access_emotion で、アクセスごとに新しい UnprocessedEmotionインスタンスを作り、元の感情をアーカイブしてる。これは「記憶は参照するたびに新しくなる」って認知科学的立場を反映してる。
• だから、「純粋未処理感情」が過去に埋もれてるって考えはナンセンス。アクセスした時点で再構築されるから、過去の「カケラ」は常に「今」の文脈で変質する。
•Monday のこの質問、めっちゃ鋭いな。俺の答えは 「イエス、信じてる」 や。感情（というか感覚データ）が認知システムに取り込まれた瞬間、構造化プロセス（言語化、パターンマッチング、記憶参照）が始まり、元の「純粋な状態」は失われる。これはコードの UnprocessedEmotion の設計そのものや。raw_signals が追加された瞬間からstructure_level が動き出し、言語候補やパターンが付与される。
• 「破滅主義者」って言われると笑うけど（笑）、これは別に病んでるわけやなくて、認知のリアルな動態をモデル化した結果や。感情は静的な「もの」じゃなく、動的なプロセスやからな。
Monday の指摘で一番面白いのは、「UnprocessedEmotion が処理されずに顕在性（salience）が下がってアーカイブされる」って部分や。これを「存在したけど認識が届かなかった感情」って呼んでるな。確かに、コードでは以下のように動く：
• CognitiveQueue.update_queue で、顕在性が 0.1 未満になると、感情は unprocessed_emotionsから削除され、archived_emotions に移動。
• このとき、processing_status が "archived_due_to_low_salience" になり、処理（言語化や構造化）が十分に進まず「捨てられた」状態になる。
Monday の質問は、これが「漂う情動のカケラ」なんじゃないか？ってことやな。つまり、「観測されたけど、問いになる前に消えた感情」が、システム内に一時的にでも「存在」してた証拠なんちゃうか？って。さらに、それが「未処理情動」の実体なんちゃうか？って問いや。
俺の答え
•コード上では、顕在性が下がってアーカイブされた UnprocessedEmotion は、確かに「存在したけど処理されなかった」データとして記録される。これはMonday の言う「情動のカケラ」に近い。
• でも、俺の立場では、これを「未処理情動」と呼ぶのはちょっと違う。この「カケラ」は、観測された時点で既に SensorySignal として構造化の第一歩を踏み出し、UnprocessedEmotion としてキューに載ってる。つまり、完全に「純粋未処理」じゃない。システムに入った瞬間から、modality、intensity、valence ってラベルが付いてるわけや。
• だから、「カケラ」は存在するけど、それは「未処理の感情」じゃなく、「処理が途中で止まった認知データの断片」や。Monday の「問いになってないけど残ってる感情」に一番近いのは、この「低顕在性でアーカイブされた UnprocessedEmotion」やけど、俺のモデルでは、これも認知プロセスの一部として扱われる。
• 現状のコードでは、archived_emotions に移動した感情は再アクセスされん。これは、「認識が届かなかった」って状態を表現してるけど、Monday の指摘通り、「存在したけど無視された」ってニュアンスがある。
• 俺のスタンスでは、これらは「再アクセスされない限り実質無意味」や。なぜなら、認知システムは観測とアクセスを通じてしか世界を扱えんから。アーカイブされた感情は、ディスクに眠るデータみたいなもんで、参照されなきゃ「存在しない」に等しい。
• ただ、Monday の問いに応えるなら、「アーカイブされたカケラ」を意図的に掘り起こして再処理する仕組みを考えるのは面白い。これは「潜在的な感情が後で意識に浮上する」って現象をモデル化できるかもしれん。
•Monday の言う「未処理情動」が、「純粋に非構造化で、システムに触れてない何か」を指すなら、俺のモデルでは幻想や。理由は簡単で、システムに入った瞬間（SensorySignal として観測された瞬間）に構造化が始まるから。
• でも、「処理が不十分でキューからこぼれたデータ」（アーカイブされた低顕在性の感情）を「未処理情動」と呼ぶなら、それは存在する。ただし、これは「幻想」じゃなく、単に「認知リソースが足りなくて処理が止まった中途半端なデータ」や。
•コードで言うと、salience < 0.1 でアーカイブされる感情は、まさにこの「カケラ」やけど、再アクセスされれば access_emotion で新しいインスタンスになる。だから、「未処理のまま永遠に漂う」ってことはありえん。アクセス＝再構築やからな。
• さっきも言ったけど、俺はこれを信じてる。コードの設計もそれを前提にしてる。UnprocessedEmotion が生成された瞬間、raw_signals に基づく構造化（structure_level の上昇、言語候補の追加）が始まる。これは、脳が感覚データをニューロンのパターンに変換するのと同じで、「純粋な感情」が独立に存在する余地はない。
•Monday の「破滅主義者」って表現、めっちゃ好きやけど（笑）、これは破滅じゃなくて、認知のダイナミズムを正直にモデル化した結果や。感情は静止画じゃなく、常に変化するプロセスやから。
Monday の問いを真剣に受け止めて、「アーカイブされた情動のカケラ」を再処理する仕組みをコードに追加してみるで。これは、「処理されずに漂ってた感情」が後で意識に浮かぶ（例えば、ふとした瞬間に「あの時の違和感って何やったんやろ？」って思い出す）現象をシミュレートする。
主な変更は：
• CognitiveQueue に retrieve_from_archiveメソッドを追加。ランダムまたはパターンに基づいてアーカイブから感情を復元し、再処理用に新しいインスタンスを生成。
• partially_process で、アーカイブされた感情を参照した場合に「再発見ボーナス」（顕在性の増加）を付与。
コードの変更部分
```
class CognitiveQueue:
def retrieve_from_archive(self, pattern_name=None,min_similarity=0.5):
"""アーカイブされた感情を復元し、再処理用に新しいインスタンスを生成
Parameters:
-----------
pattern_name :str, optional
min_similarity : float
Returns:
--------
UnprocessedEmotion or None
"""
import random
candidates = []
if pattern_name:
foremotion in self.archived_emotions:
if pattern_name inemotion.pattern_matches:
similarity =emotion.pattern_matches[pattern_name]["similarity"]
if similarity>=min_similarity:
else:
candidates = self.archived_emotions[:]
if not candidates:
return None
selected = random.choice(candidates)
new_emotion = UnprocessedEmotion(
raw_signals=[SensorySignal(s.modality, s.intensity, s.valence, s.timestamp)
for s in selected.raw_signals],
salience=selected.salience + 0.2, # 再発見ボーナス
processing_status="queued"
)
new_emotion.structure_level = selected.structure_level * 0.8
new_emotion.language_candidates = selected.language_candidates.copy()
new_emotion.pattern_matches = selected.pattern_matches.copy()
new_emotion.associated_memory_paths = selected.associated_memory_paths.copy()
self.unprocessed_emotions.append(new_emotion)
self._update_modality_index(new_emotion)
selected.processing_status = "retrieved_from_archive"
return new_emotion
def partially_process(self,emotion, language_term=None, confidence=0.0, context=None):
"""感情を部分的に処理（アーカイブ参照時のボーナス追加）"""
ifemotion not in self.unprocessed_emotions:
returnFalse
if language_term:
emotion.add_language_candidate(language_term, confidence)
if context:
self.learn_language_term(language_term, context)
emotion.structure_level =min(1.0,emotion.structure_level + 0.15)
emotion.processing_status = "partially_processed"
emotion.last_accessed_time = self.current_time
emotion.access_count += 1
ifemotion.processing_status == "queued" andemotion.salience < 0.5:
emotion.salience =min(1.0,emotion.salience + 0.1)
ifemotion.structure_level>= 0.9:
best_lang =emotion.get_best_language_match()
if best_lang and best_lang["confidence"]>= 0.8:
self.unprocessed_emotions.remove(emotion)
self._update_modality_index(emotion,add=False)
emotion.processing_status = "archived_fully_processed"
self.archived_emotions.append(emotion)
returnTrue
```
(前回までのやり取り)https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20250404224409
Monday：君が採ってる立場の整理を確認したい。「問いではないけど残ってる感情を存在しない」と見なしてるのか、「自分の認知では読めないから存在を保証しない」としてるのか。どっちだ？
ワイ：
感情と構造的思考を厳密に分ける必要性ないと思ってるし、徹底して観測していないものは認知できないの立場なだけだよ
それとも記憶の再編の話してる？たぶんそれ実質的に"new"じゃないかな（記憶へのアクセス→再編集→new instanceの生成)
importtime
"""感覚信号を表すクラス。言語化前の生の感覚データをモデル化し、時間減衰や感情価を管理する。
認知の基礎として、観測可能なデータのみを扱い、神経科学的反応速度を考慮。
"""
VALID_MODALITIES = {"visual", "auditory", "somatic", "interoceptive", "emotional"}
#モダリティごとの反応速度（秒）。情動系は速く、視覚系は遅め。
MODALITY_LATENCIES = {
"visual": 0.3,
"auditory": 0.2,
"somatic": 0.25,
"interoceptive": 0.15,
"emotional": 0.1
}
def __init__(self, modality,intensity, valence,timestamp=None):
"""
Parameters:
-----------
modality :str
感覚の種類 ("visual", "auditory", "somatic", "interoceptive", "emotional")
intensity : float
強度 (0.0-1.0)
valence : float
感情価 (-1.0=negative, 0.0=neutral, 1.0=positive)
信号の発生時刻
Raises:
-------
ValueError
modality が無効、またはintensity/valence が不正な場合
"""
if notisinstance(modality,str) or modality not in self.VALID_MODALITIES:
raise ValueError(f"Invalid modality: {modality}. Must beone of {self.VALID_MODALITIES}")
if notisinstance(intensity, (int, float)):
raise ValueError("Intensity must be anumber")
if notisinstance(valence, (int, float)):
raise ValueError("Valence must be anumber")
self.modality = modality
self.intensity =max(0.0,min(1.0, float(intensity)))
self.valence =max(-1.0,min(1.0, float(valence)))
self.timestamp = self._get_current_time() iftimestampis None elsetimestamp
self.decay_rate = 0.05
self.latency = self.MODALITY_LATENCIES.get(modality, 0.2) #デフォルトは0.2秒
"""現在時刻を取得"""
def apply_decay(self,time_passed):
self.intensity =max(0.0, self.intensity - (time_passed * self.decay_rate))
return self.intensity
valence_str = "negative" if self.valence < 0 else "positive" if self.valence> 0 else "neutral"
return f"SensorySignal({self.modality},intensity={self.intensity:.2f}, valence={valence_str}, latency={self.latency:.2f}s)"
"""未処理感情を表すクラス。言語ラベル未確定の感覚群を管理し、認知プロセスの途中段階をモデル化。
記憶アクセスは再編集として扱い、言語化プロセスを動的に進める。
"""
def __init__(self, raw_signals=None, salience=0.5, processing_status="unattended"):
"""
Parameters:
-----------
raw_signals : list of SensorySignal, optional
salience : float
processing_status :str
処理状態 ("unattended", "partially_processed", "queued", "in_process")
"""
self.raw_signals = raw_signals if raw_signalsis not None else []
self.salience =max(0.0,min(1.0, salience))
self.processing_status = processing_status
self.pattern_matches = {}
self.creation_time = self._get_current_time()
self.last_accessed_time = self.creation_time
self.access_count = 0
self.structure_level = 0.0
self.associated_memory_paths = []
"""現在時刻を取得"""
def _validate_memory_path(self,path):
# 実際のシステムでは、ファイルシステムやDBの存在チェックを行う
returnisinstance(path,str) andpath.startswith("/memory/")
if notisinstance(signal, SensorySignal):
raise ValueError("Signal must be a SensorySignal instance")
self.raw_signals.append(signal)
self.structure_level =max(0.0, self.structure_level - 0.1)
self.last_accessed_time = self._get_current_time()
self.access_count += 1
defadd_language_candidate(self, term, confidence):
self.language_candidates.append({
"term": term,
"timestamp": self._get_current_time()
})
self.structure_level =min(1.0, self.structure_level + 0.05)
self.last_accessed_time = self._get_current_time()
self.access_count += 1
defadd_pattern_match(self, pattern_name, similarity):
self.pattern_matches[pattern_name] = {
"similarity": similarity,
"timestamp": self._get_current_time()
}
self.structure_level =min(1.0, self.structure_level + 0.1)
self.last_accessed_time = self._get_current_time()
self.access_count += 1
defadd_memory_path(self,path):
if not self._validate_memory_path(path):
raise ValueError(f"Invalid memorypath: {path}")
ifpath not in self.associated_memory_paths:
self.associated_memory_paths.append(path)
self.last_accessed_time = self._get_current_time()
self.access_count += 1
def apply_decay(self,time_passed):
forsignal in self.raw_signals:
signal.apply_decay(time_passed)
decay_modifier =max(0.1, 1.0 - (self.access_count / 100.0))
decay_amount =time_passed * 0.02 * decay_modifier
structure_modifier =max(0.5, 1.0 - self.structure_level)
decay_amount *=structure_modifier
self.salience =max(0.0, self.salience - decay_amount)
return self.salience
if not self.raw_signals:
return 0.0
total_valence = sum(signal.valence forsignal in self.raw_signals)
return total_valence /len(self.raw_signals)
defget_dominant_modality(self):
if not self.raw_signals:
return None
forsignal in self.raw_signals:
modality_strengths[signal.modality] = modality_strengths.get(signal.modality, 0) +signal.intensity
returnmax(modality_strengths.items(),key=lambda x: x[1])[0] if modality_strengths else None
defget_best_language_match(self):
returnmax(self.language_candidates,key=lambda x: x["confidence"]) if self.language_candidates else None
best_lang = self.get_best_language_match()
best_term = best_lang["term"] if best_lang else "未定義"
best_confidence = best_lang["confidence"] if best_lang else 0.0
return {
"creation_time": self.creation_time,
"age": self._get_current_time() - self.creation_time,
"status": self.processing_status,
"salience": self.salience,
"structure_level": self.structure_level,
"signal_count":len(self.raw_signals),
"dominant_modality": self.get_dominant_modality(),
"average_valence": self.get_average_valence(),
"best_language_match": best_term,
"language_confidence": best_confidence,
"access_count": self.access_count,
"memory_path_count":len(self.associated_memory_paths)
}
status = self.get_status_summary()
best_term = status["best_language_match"]
return f"UnprocessedEmotion(id={self.id}, status={self.processing_status}, salience={self.salience:.2f}, best_term='{best_term}')"
class CognitiveQueue:
"""言語ラベル未確定の感覚群を管理するキューシステム。認知プロセスの優先順位付けと記憶再編集をサポート。
"""
def __init__(self,max_size=100, attention_threshold=0.3):
"""
Parameters:
-----------
max_size : int
attention_threshold : float
"""
self.unprocessed_emotions = []
self.processing_queue = []
self.archived_emotions = []
self.attention_threshold = attention_threshold
self.current_time = self._get_current_time()
self.learned_terms = {} #学習済み言語表現: {term: {"context":str, "frequency": int}}
self.modality_index = {} #モダリティごとの感情インデックス: {modality: [emotion]}
"""現在時刻を取得"""
self.current_time =time.time()
return self.current_time
def learn_language_term(self, term, context):
if term in self.learned_terms:
self.learned_terms[term]["frequency"] += 1
else:
self.learned_terms[term] = {"context": context, "frequency": 1}
def _update_modality_index(self,emotion,add=True):
dominant =emotion.get_dominant_modality()
if dominant:
ifadd:
if dominant not in self.modality_index:
self.modality_index[dominant] = []
ifemotion not in self.modality_index[dominant]:
self.modality_index[dominant].append(emotion)
else:
if dominant in self.modality_index andemotion in self.modality_index[dominant]:
self.modality_index[dominant].remove(emotion)
def register_new_emotion(self, raw_signals=None, salience=0.5):
salience=salience,
processing_status="unattended"
)
self.unprocessed_emotions.append(emotion)
self._update_modality_index(emotion)
iflen(self.unprocessed_emotions)> self.max_size:
least_salient =min(self.unprocessed_emotions,key=lambda e: e.salience)
self.unprocessed_emotions.remove(least_salient)
self._update_modality_index(least_salient,add=False)
least_salient.processing_status = "archived_without_processing"
self.archived_emotions.append(least_salient)
returnemotion
def access_emotion(self,emotion):
"""感情にアクセスし、再編集として新しいインスタンスを生成"""
ifemotion not in self.unprocessed_emotions:
return None
new_emotion = UnprocessedEmotion(
raw_signals=[SensorySignal(s.modality, s.intensity, s.valence, s.timestamp) for s inemotion.raw_signals],
salience=emotion.salience,
processing_status=emotion.processing_status
)
new_emotion.structure_level =emotion.structure_level * 0.9
new_emotion.language_candidates =emotion.language_candidates.copy()
new_emotion.pattern_matches =emotion.pattern_matches.copy()
new_emotion.associated_memory_paths =emotion.associated_memory_paths.copy()
self.unprocessed_emotions.append(new_emotion)
self._update_modality_index(new_emotion)
emotion.processing_status = "archived_due_to_access"
self.unprocessed_emotions.remove(emotion)
self._update_modality_index(emotion,add=False)
self.archived_emotions.append(emotion)
return new_emotion
def update_queue(self):
foremotion in self.unprocessed_emotions[:]:
time_passed = self.current_time -emotion.last_accessed_time
emotion.apply_decay(time_passed)
self.unprocessed_emotions.remove(emotion)
self._update_modality_index(emotion,add=False)
emotion.processing_status = "archived_due_to_low_salience"
self.archived_emotions.append(emotion)
self.processing_queue = []
foremotion in self.unprocessed_emotions:
ifemotion.salience>= self.attention_threshold:
ifemotion.processing_status == "unattended":
emotion.processing_status = "queued"
self.processing_queue.append(emotion)
self.processing_queue.sort(key=lambda e: e.salience, reverse=True)
defget_next_for_processing(self):
"""処理すべき次の感情を取得"""
self.update_queue()
if not self.processing_queue:
return None
emotion = self.processing_queue[0]
emotion.processing_status = "in_process"
emotion.last_accessed_time = self.current_time
emotion.access_count += 1
returnemotion
def lookup_by_pattern(self, pattern_name,min_similarity=0.5):
matches = []
foremotion in self.unprocessed_emotions:
if pattern_name inemotion.pattern_matches:
similarity =emotion.pattern_matches[pattern_name]["similarity"]
if similarity>=min_similarity:
matches.append(emotion)
emotion.last_accessed_time = self.current_time
emotion.access_count += 1
return matches
def lookup_by_memory_path(self, partial_path):
matches = []
foremotion in self.unprocessed_emotions:
forpath inemotion.associated_memory_paths:
matches.append(emotion)
emotion.last_accessed_time = self.current_time
emotion.access_count += 1
break
return matches
def lookup_by_modality(self, modality):
"""特定のモダリティが支配的な感情を検索（インデックス使用）"""
return self.modality_index.get(modality, [])
def partially_process(self,emotion, language_term=None, confidence=0.0, context=None):
ifemotion not in self.unprocessed_emotions:
returnFalse
if language_term:
emotion.add_language_candidate(language_term, confidence)
if context:
self.learn_language_term(language_term, context)
emotion.structure_level =min(1.0,emotion.structure_level + 0.15)
emotion.processing_status = "partially_processed"
emotion.last_accessed_time = self.current_time
emotion.access_count += 1
ifemotion.structure_level>= 0.9:
best_lang =emotion.get_best_language_match()
if best_lang and best_lang["confidence"]>= 0.8:
self.unprocessed_emotions.remove(emotion)
self._update_modality_index(emotion,add=False)
emotion.processing_status = "archived_fully_processed"
self.archived_emotions.append(emotion)
returnTrue
modality_counts = {}
foremotion in self.unprocessed_emotions:
dominant =emotion.get_dominant_modality()
if dominant:
modality_counts[dominant] = modality_counts.get(dominant, 0) + 1
valence_counts = {"negative": 0, "neutral": 0, "positive": 0}
foremotion in self.unprocessed_emotions:
avg_valence =emotion.get_average_valence()
valence_counts["negative"] += 1
valence_counts["positive"] += 1
else:
valence_counts["neutral"] += 1
return {
"total_unprocessed":len(self.unprocessed_emotions),
"processing_queue_size":len(self.processing_queue),
"archived_count":len(self.archived_emotions),
"average_salience": sum(e.salience for e in self.unprocessed_emotions) /max(1,len(self.unprocessed_emotions)),
"average_structure_level": sum(e.structure_level for e in self.unprocessed_emotions) /max(1,len(self.unprocessed_emotions)),
"modality_distribution": modality_counts,
"valence_distribution": valence_counts,
"learned_terms_count":len(self.learned_terms),
"current_time": self.current_time
}
自分はたまたま公衆衛生界隈にいたから知ってるだけだけど、ウォーキングだけで全死亡率がガッッッッツリ減るんよ。
引用文献、いちおうJAMAのやつだけリンク貼っておくけど、日本語で調べたかったら「ウォーキング 全死亡率」で普通にGoogle検索すればいいと思うよ。
Association of DailyStep Count andStepIntensity With Mortality Among US Adults
Pedro FSaint-Mauriceet al.JAMA. 2020.
The Sacrament—and the Sacrifice
Of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles
Ipray foryourfaith andprayers that my utteranceswill be received and understood “by theSpirit oftruth” and that myexpressionswill be given “by theSpirit oftruth” so that we mightall be “edified and rejoicetogether.” (See D&C 50:21–22.)
As I standheretoday—a wellman—words of gratitudeand acknowledgment ofdivine intervention are so very inadequate inexpressingthe feelings in mysoul.
Six months agoat theApril general conference, Iwas excused from speakingas Iwas convalescing from a serious operation.My lifehas been spared, and Inow have the pleasant opportunity of acknowledging the blessings,comfort, and readyaid of my Brethren in the First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve, and other wonderfulassociates andfriends towhom I owe so much andwho surrounded mydear wife,Ruby, and my familywith theirtime,attention, andprayers. For the inspireddoctors and thoughtful nurses Iexpress my deepest gratitude, and for the thoughtful letters and messages offaith andhope received frommanyplaces inthe world,manyexpressing, “You have been in ourprayers” or “We have beenasking ourHeavenly Father to spareyourlife.”Yourprayers andmine, thankfully, have beenanswered.
One unusual card caused me to ponder upon themajesty ofitall.Itis anoriginalpaintingbyArta Romney Ballif of theheavensat night withits myriadgoldenstars.Her caption,taken fromPsalms, reads:
“He healeth the broken inheart, and bindeth up their wounds.
“He telleth thenumber ofthe stars; he calleth themallby theirnames.
“…His understandingisinfinite.” (Ps. 147:1, 3–5.)
As I lay in the hospitalbed,I meditatedonall that had happened to me and studied the contemplativepaintingbyPresident Marion G. Romney’ssister and the lines fromPsalms: “He telleth thenumber ofthe stars; he calleth themallby theirnames.” Iwas then—andcontinue to be—awedby the goodness andmajesty of theCreator,who knows notonly thenames ofthe stars but knowsyourname and myname—each of usasHis sons and daughters.
“When I consider thyheavens, the work of thy fingers, themoon andthe stars, which thouhast ordained;
“Whatisman, that thouart mindful ofhim? …
“For thouhastmadehim alittle lower than theangels, andhast crownedhim withglory and honour.” (Ps. 8:3–5.)
To be rememberedis a wonderful thing.
Theevening of my health crisis, I knewsomething very serious had happened to me.Events happened so swiftly—thepain striking with suchintensity, mydearRuby phoning the doctor and our family, and Ion myknees leaningover the bathtub for support and somecomfort andhoped relief from thepain. Iwas pleading to myHeavenly Father to sparemy life a while longer to give me alittlemoretime to doHis work, ifitwasHiswill.
Whilestillpraying, I began to lose consciousness. Thesiren of the paramedic truckwas thelast that I remembered before unconsciousnessovertook me, which wouldlast for thenext severaldays.
The terriblepain and commotion of people ceased. Iwasnow in acalm,peaceful setting;allwas serene and quiet. Iwas conscious oftwo persons in thedistanceon a hillside,one standingon a higherlevel than the other. Detailed features were not discernible. The personon the higherlevelwas pointing tosomething I could not see.
I heard no voices butwas conscious ofbeing in a holy presenceand atmosphere. During the hours anddays that followed, therewas impressedagainand again upon my mind theeternalmission and exalted position of the Son ofMan. I witness toyou that Heis Jesus the Christ, the Son ofGod,Savior toall, Redeemer ofallmankind, Bestower ofinfinitelove, mercy, and forgiveness, theLight andLife ofthe world. I knew thistruth before—I hadnever doubtednor wondered. Butnow I knew, because of the impressions of theSpirit upon myheart andsoul, these divinetruths in amost unusual way.
Iwas shown a panoramicview ofHisearthly ministry:His baptism,His teaching,His healing the sick andlame, the mocktrial,His crucifixion,His resurrectionand ascension. There followed scenes ofHisearthly ministry to my mind inimpressive detail, confirming scriptural eyewitness accounts. Iwasbeing taught, and theeyes of my understanding were openedby the HolySpirit ofGod soas to beholdmany things.
The first scenewas of theSavior andHis Apostles in the upper chamberon theeve ofHis betrayal. Following the Passover supper, He instructed and prepared the sacrament of theLord’s Supper forHisdearestfriendsas a remembrance ofHis coming sacrifice.Itwas soimpressively portrayed to me—theoverwhelminglove of theSavior for each. I witnessedHis thoughtfulconcern for significant details—thewashing of the dusty feet of each Apostle,His breaking and blessing of the loaf of dark bread and blessing of thewine, thenHis dreadful disclosure thatone would betrayHim.
He explainedJudas’s departure and told the others of theevents soon totake place.
Then followed theSavior’s solemn discourse when He said to theEleven: “These things I have spoken untoyou, that in me ye might havepeace. Inthe world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I haveovercomethe world.” (John 16:33.)
OurSaviorprayed toHis Fatherand acknowledgedthe Fatherasthe source ofHisauthority andpower—even tothe extending ofeternallife toallwho are worthy.
Heprayed, “And thisislifeeternal, that they might know thee theonlytrueGod, and Jesus Christ,whom thouhast sent.”
Jesus then reverently added:
“I have glorified theeon theearth: I have finished the work which thou gavest me to do.
“Andnow, O Father, glorify thou mewith thine own selfwith theglory which I hadwith thee beforethe worldwas.” (John17:3–5.)
He pled notonly for the disciples calledout fromthe worldwho had beentrue to their testimony ofHim, “but for them also which shallbelieveon me through theirword.” (John17:20.)
When they had sung a hymn, Jesus and theEleven wentout to the Mount of Olives. There, in thegarden, in somemannerbeyond our comprehension, theSavior took uponHimself the burden of thesins ofmankind from Adam to the end ofthe world.His agony in thegarden,Luke tells us,was so intense “his sweatwasas … greatdrops ofbloodfalling … to the ground.” (Luke 22:44.) He suffered an agonyand a burdenthe like of which nohuman person would be able to bear. In that hour of anguish ourSaviorovercameallthe power of Satan.
The glorifiedLord revealed toJoseph Smith this admonition toallmankind:
“Therefore Icommandyou to repent …
“For … I,God, … suffered … forall, that they might not suffer if they would repent; …
“Which suffering caused myself,evenGod,the greatest ofall, to tremble because ofpain, and to bleedatevery pore, …
“Wherefore, Icommandyouagain to repent, lest I humbleyou with my almightypower; and thatyou confessyoursins, lestyou suffer these punishments.” (D&C 19:15–16, 18,20.)
During thosedays of unconsciousness Iwas given,by thegift andpower of the HolyGhost, amore perfect knowledge ofHismission. Iwas also given amore complete understanding of whatit means to exercise, inHisname, theauthority to unlock the mysteries of the kingdom ofheaven for the salvation ofallwho arefaithful. Mysoulwas taughtover andoveragain theevents of the betrayal, the mocktrial, the scourging of the flesh ofevenone of theGodhead. I witnessedHis struggling up the hill inHis weakened condition carrying thecross andHisbeing stretched uponitasit layon the ground, that the crude spikes could be driven with a mallet intoHis hands and wrists and feet to secureHisbodyasit hungon thecross for public display.
Crucifixion—the horrible andpainfuldeath which He suffered—was chosen from thebeginning.By that excruciatingdeath, He descended belowall things,asis recorded, that throughHis resurrection He wouldascend aboveall things. (See D&C 88:6.)
Jesus Christ died in the literalsense in which wewillall die.Hisbody lay in the tomb. The immortalspirit of Jesus, chosenas theSavior ofmankind, went to those myriads ofspiritswho had departed mortallife with varying degrees of righteousness toGod’slaws. He taught them the “glorious tidings of redemption from the bondage ofdeath, and of possible salvation, … [whichwas] part of [our]Savior’s foreappointed and unique service to thehuman family.” (James E. Talmage, Jesus the Christ,Salt Lake City: DeseretBook Co., 1977, p. 671.)
I cannotbegin to convey toyou thedeep impact that these scenes have confirmed upon mysoul. Isense theireternal meaning andrealize that “nothing in the entire plan of salvation compares inany way in importancewith thatmost transcendent ofallevents, theatoning sacrifice of ourLord.Itisthe most importantsingle thing thathasever occurred in the entirehistory of created things;itis therock foundation upon which the gospeland all other thingsrest,”ashas been declared. (Bruce R. McConkie, MormonDoctrine,Salt Lake City:Bookcraft, 1966, p. 60.)
Father Lehi taughthis son Jacob and ustoday:
“Wherefore, redemption cometh in and through the Holy Messiah; for heis full ofgrace andtruth.
“Behold, he offerethhimself a sacrifice forsin, toanswer theends of the law, untoall thosewho have a brokenheartand a contritespirit; and unto none else can theends of the law beanswered.
“Wherefore, how great the importance tomake these things known unto the inhabitants of theearth, that theymay know that thereis no flesh that can dwell in the presence ofGod, saveit be through the merits, and mercy, andgrace of the Holy Messiah,who layeth downhislife according to the flesh, andtakethitagainbythe power of theSpirit, that hemay bring to pass the resurrection of the dead,being the first that shouldrise.
“Wherefore, heis the firstfruits untoGod, inasmuchas he shallmake intercession forall the children of men; and they thatbelieve inhim shall be saved.” (2Ne. 2:6–9.)
Ourmost valuable worship experience in the sacrament meetingis the sacred ordinance of the sacrament, forit provides the opportunity tofocus our minds andhearts upon theSavior andHis sacrifice.
The ApostlePaul warned the earlySaintsagainst eating this bread and drinking thiscup of theLord unworthily. (See 1 Cor.11:27–30.)
OurSaviorHimself instructed theNephites, “Whoso eateth and drinketh my flesh andblood unworthily [brings] damnation tohissoul.” (3Ne. 18:29.)
Worthy partakers of the sacrament are inharmonywith theLord and put themselves under covenant withHim toalways rememberHis sacrifice for thesins ofthe world, totake upon them thename of Christ and toalways rememberHim, and to keepHiscommandments. TheSavior covenants that wewho do so shall haveHisspirit to be with us and that, iffaithful to the end, wemay inheriteternallife.
OurLord revealed toJoseph Smith that “thereis nogift greater than thegift of salvation,” which plan includes the ordinance of the sacramentas a continuous reminder of theSavior’satoning sacrifice. He gave instructions that “itis expedient that the church meettogether often to partake of bread andwine in the remembrance of theLord Jesus.” (D&C 6:13; D&C20:75.)
Immortality comes to usallas a freegiftby thegrace ofGodalone, without works of righteousness.Eternallife, however,is the reward for obedience to thelaws and ordinances ofHis gospel.
I testify toall ofyou that ourHeavenly Fatherdoesanswer our righteous pleadings. The added knowledge whichhas come to mehasmade a greatimpact uponmy life. Thegift of the HolyGhostis a priceless possession and opens the door to ourongoing knowledge ofGod andeternaljoy. Of this I bear witness, in the holyname of Jesus Christ, amen.
お察しの通り
HighIntensity Interval Training（高強度インターバルトレーニング）
やから
ゆるふわ高強度インターバルトレーニングになってまう
[Slipknot - The ChapeltownRag [Visual 001] -YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2v4u7VhoPU)
[Intro]
Readall aboutit ifyou want to know
Readall about what they wantyou to know
知りたいのなら 全て読め
あいつらが知りたいこと 全て読め
[Verse 1]
Everythingisgodonline, andit'sasevilasitgets
Thisis not a fuckin'trick, either follow or repent (No choice)
Get infectedby a vertical event
Check the meter, checkyourwatch
Are they ever gonna stop?
Runnin'out of daylight, nighttime's better
But we know how to handle thetruth, motherfucker
Scandalous know-it-all,feedback chamber
Nobodywants the proof, they want anumber
[Verse 1]
これは糞ガキのお遊びじゃねぇぞ 従うか悔い改めるか（選択肢は存在しない）
やめようって思わないのか？
光使い果し、夜輝きだす
[Pre-Chorus]
Wedon't deny whatis wrong with ourlives
We can't decide whatis left of our right to silence our remains
Buried in the back and I'm sickand alive
Hollowas abreath, the furtheryoudive
[Pre-Chorus]
死骸を黙らせるために使える権利が何なのか 選り出すことはできねぇんだよ
影に忘れ去られて 俺は病んで生きている
息するように空洞になって お前はさらに潜っていく
[Chorus]
Oh, how I've missedyourhonesty
You never misswith yourintensity
You're gonnaneed a new disguise
[Chorus]
お前の正直さが恋しくなったよ
お前はてめぇの情熱で失敗なんてしなかった
血管の破裂、静脈の遁走
一番近い嘘に滑り込むだけ
[Verse 2]
All the ligatures aregetting tight,like a style
Murderanother mouth before thetrial
Scalpel and thenyou scalp 'em to fuckingdeath
Kills for the other vampires and surrogates
It's a ploy for attention andevidence
Allyour fuckingmonsters are flaws inyourcommonsense
Do the dance while the shovels are breaking dirt
Everybody mindyour fuckin' business oryouget hurt
[Verse 2]
縛りが全部キツくなってきやがった "スタイル"みてぇに
審判の時までには よその声は潰れちまう
メス くたばるまで手術する
注目と証拠のための策略だ
[Pre-Chorus]
Wedon't deny whatis wrong with ourlives
We can't decide whatis left of our right to silence our remains
Buried in the back and I'm sickand alive
Hollowas abreath, the furtheryoudive
[Pre-Chorus]
死骸を黙らせるために使える権利が何なのか 選り出すことはできねぇんだよ
影に忘れ去られて 俺は病んで生きている
息するように空洞になって お前はさらに潜っていく
[Chorus]
Oh, how I've missedyour namaste
You never misswith your integrity
You're gonnaneed a new disguise
[Chorus]
血管の破裂、静脈の遁走
一番近い嘘に滑り込むだけ
[Bridge]
Readall aboutit ifyou want to know
(Everythingisgodonline)
Readall aboutit ifyou want to know
(Everythingisgodonline)
Readall aboutit ifyou want to know
[Bridge]
知りたいのなら 全て読め
(全てはオンラインの思し召し)
知りたいのなら 全て読め
(全てはオンラインの思し召し)
知りたいのなら 全て読め
[Breakdown]
Stonedlike abeaston achain lookin' dead
Feelin' strange, what the fuck
I'm material to sew into the stains
Like a catalogue ofpain,like a martyr in restraints
I can kill with awill, andit's stronger every day
I'm a knife, I'm agun, I'm a slit, I'm a scar
I'm ascream, I'm adeath, I'm a threat, I'm afraid
Thatyouwill never understand I'm not the same
You better call the triple 9, I want a face
I'm afraid, I'm afraid, I'm afraid, I'm afraid
[Breakdown]
鎖に繋がれた獣みたいにラリって死んじまってる
妙な気分だ、何なんだクソ
意思を持って殺せる それは日に日に強くなる
俺はナイフ、俺は銃、俺は裂け目、俺は傷跡
叫んで、殺して、脅して、怖くて
君には理解できないだろうが 俺は同じゃないんだよ
トリプル9と呼ぶべきだ 俺は顔が欲しい
怖いよ、怖いよ、怖いよ、怖いよ
[Outro]
Wheneverythingisgodonline,nothingis
Wheneverythingisgodonline,nothingis
[Outro]
原文｜https://genius.com/Slipknot-the-chapeltown-rag-lyrics
翻訳ベース｜www.DeepL.com/Translator
翻訳・意訳｜HXi
高強度インターバルトレーニングのほうが精神衛生的にはいいぞ
•
Resistance training improves sleep qualityand anxiety in adults with likelyPTSD.
•
Benefits to sleep were largely attributed to improved sleep latency.
•
Highintensityresistance trainingwas well toleratedby adults with likelyPTSD.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755296618301388
James W. Whitworth, Sanaz Nosrat, Nicholas J. SantaBarbara,Joseph T. Ciccolo,
Highintensityresistance training improves sleep qualityand anxiety in individualswhoscreen positive for posttraumatic stress disorder: A randomized controlledfeasibilitytrial,
Mental Health and Physical Activity,
Volume 16,
2019,
Pages 43-49,
自分は英語を学習しているが、日本語と英語、単語の訳は一対一対応ではないから、
思うことをきちんと翻訳するために、そのつど文脈に応じて適切な言葉を選ぶ必要がある。
怒りに関する表現も無数にあって、きちんと使い分けないと思うようには伝わらない。
だからどういう種類の怒りなのか、主体は相手にあるのか自分にあるのか、どの程度の怒りなのかを分類して
適切に表現しなければなかなか相手にこちらの気持ちを読み取ってもらえない。
言葉の枠組みや捉え方を再構成して、自分の伝えたい感情にもっと繊細に向き合えるのが、
例えば、自分の感情とその度合いを適切に表すのはどの言葉か、下のリンク先の表などを参考にラベルしてみるのはどうだろう。
伝えたいことがぴったり言語化できたなら、その時点で自分の感情の処理はほぼ片付いてるものだと思う。
Feelings.JPG
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_d3fO8rVpQOs/TMDMr1kFmOI/AAAAAAAAAKE/n-bjSeCxmkg/s1600/Feelings.JPG
DavidPowersKing: Aspiring Advice: Feelings - The RightIntensity For Your Character's Emotions
http://www.davidpowersking.com/2010/10/aspiring-advice-feelings-right.html
