  |
はてなキーワード:frameworkとは
カタログめくって(Webページググりまくって)、良さげな(業務経歴書にかけそうな)新しいサービスなりプロダクトなりを見つけたら、鼻を膨らませて得意げにメンバーに報告し、ポチる(リポジトリに組み込む)エンジニアを……、
と、名付けたよ。
経営者は「最新の情報に敏感」「技術に詳しい」とか評価するようだけど、カタログひっくり返しては「あれはいい」「この新製品はすごい！」「これ最高！」って喋りまくる人間が、どれほど軽薄で浅はかかわからんのだろうか？
わからんのだろうな。
ミーハーに「AI最高！ これでお金集めてガッポガッポ！！」みたいな経営者じゃ。
ADRと称して導入企業名と諸元の比較ばかりして、一番デカくて高価なのが正義、くらいしか語れないのを、エンジニアと？ w
それはただの消費者だ。
って言うと、「お前が新しいサービスについていけてないだけじゃねーのか」って陰口を叩かれるんだが、新サービスのチェックした上で、煽り文句を真に受けて「一秒でも早く使ってみたい」という、単細胞的な反応をしないだけだ。
出自はどこか？
等々、広告記事以外の情報を集めて検討し、「今目の前にあるプロダクトに使えるか？」考えた上で、余計で巨大なフジツボをくっつけるだけなら触る価値もない、と判断しとるだけだ。
いくつもプロダクト名を列記したくてうずうずするが、どう考えても業務妨害になるから、できない。
そもそも、待ち望んでいたサービスやプロダクトなら、.netFrameworkもLambdaもEMR(Spark)も使えるようになったらすぐに採用するように説得してきたし、新サービスのSnowflakeをぜひ使いたいというのを、処理の特性と、プロダクトの設計等々を理由に止めてAthenaを採用して、1リクエストあたりリアルタイム処理は1、2秒レスポンスタイプが伸びたが、事前準備可能なリクエスト、再度リクエストであれば即時レスポンス、その処理部分にかかる利用料金を1/100にした。
利用プロダクトの選定は、普段から情報収集しているから、ほとんどかからん。
初回リリースには、肌感覚だがそこら辺の現場の1.2倍くらいの実時間がかかる。
けど、人月では8〜9割くらいで済んでいる。
で、初回リリース後、追加開発が重なれば重なるほど、そこら辺の開発の2割引くらいの人時間金で済むし、安定度も高い。
それができる仕組みを、初回リリース時にほぼ揃え切ってしまうから。
そう言う準備設計こそ、プロダクトと会社の健康余命を伸ばす秘訣だ。
もし夏目漱石が、プログラミングの主要概念を自ら日本語に翻訳していたら――と仮定すると、彼の文体や明治期の言葉遣い、漢語の選好を踏まえて、以下のような趣になると考えられます。
| 英語 | 漱石風の訳語案 | 理由・解説 |
| Variable | 変数（へんすう）／移り数 | 「変数」はすでに定着語だが、漱石なら「移り数」など文学的な情緒を帯びた訳もあり得る。変化の宿る数という意味を直訳的かつ風雅に表現。 |
| Function | 作用式／用法 | 明治期の数学や化学で「作用」はよく用いられた。漱石は日常語よりも漢語を好んだ傾向があり、「式」を付して理知的に。 |
| Class | 類型／階（きざはし） | 「クラス」を単なる「類」とせず、階層や格式を想起させる「階」を用い、文学的響きを加える。 |
| Object | 物象（ぶっしょう）／客体 | 漱石は哲学用語に通じており、ドイツ哲学経由の「客体」や漢詩文的「物象」を好みそう。 |
| Instance | 事例／具現 | 具体化の意味を強調し、「具現」というやや詩的な言い回しを採用する可能性。 |
| Loop | 環（わ）／巡り | 「ループ」は漢語にすれば「環」だが、漱石は擬人的に「巡り」として表すかもしれない。 |
| Array | 配列／ならび | 技術的な「配列」もあるが、漱石なら柔らかな響きの「ならび」も好みそう。 |
| Thread | 糸筋／綴り筋 | 並行処理のスレッドを、文学的に糸や文章にたとえ、「綴り筋」と表現。 |
| Exception | 異例／破格事 | 法や規範から外れるニュアンスを重んじ、「破格事」と漢詩的に。 |
| Debug | 虫退治／瑕（きず）探し | 「バグ」を虫にたとえてそのまま「虫退治」とするのは洒落が効く。漱石らしいユーモアが入り得る部分。 |
| Compile | 編纂（へんさん）／綴（と）じ合せ | 書物の編集に通じる語を用い、文章を束ねるような比喩で。 |
| Execute | 遂行／実行 | 法律や行政文書に見られる硬質な「遂行」を選ぶ可能性が高い。 |
| Source code | 原文／本体文 | 漱石は文学者として「原文」という表現を好みそう。 |
| Syntax | 文法／詞組（ことばぐみ） | 言語構造を古風に「詞組」と表現すれば漱石節になる。 |
| Algorithm | 算法（さんぽう）／演算譜 | 明治期数学書の用語「算法」をそのまま採用しそう。 |
| Library | 書庫／集録 | 書物に通じるメタファーで表現。 |
| Framework | 骨組／枠組 | 漱石は建築や骨格にたとえて「骨組」を選びそう。 |
| Module | 節（ふし）／章片 | 文学的構造を想起させる語を選ぶかも。 |
| Boolean | 真偽値／是非数 | 真と偽を「是非」で置き換える古風な表現。 |
| Pointer | 指標／指し手 | 将棋や文学の語彙から「指し手」とする余地も。 |
少年漫画に登場する未成年キャラクターを対象とした成人女性によるBL二次創作は、児童保護、マイノリティ表象、著作権倫理の観点から重大な問題をはらむ文化的・法的搾取行為です。
国連「子どもの売買・児童ポルノ・児童買春に関する特別報告者」や欧州評議会のガイドラインでは、次のように指摘されています。
「仮想であっても、18歳未満と認識される登場人物に対する性的描写は、児童の性的搾取を助長する表現であり、社会的許容を生み出すリスクを伴う」
特に日本のように児童をモデルにしたアニメ・マンガの性的表象が多用される国については、文化的児童ポルノの存在が現実の児童虐待の温床になるとの国際的懸念が表明されています。
少年誌に登場するキャラクターの多くは未成年であり、これらが性的被虐的関係（いわゆる「受け」）で描かれる場合、その性的イメージは児童の性的イメージの再生産に他なりません。
これは児童福祉法の精神に反し、「性的同意能力のない者の性行為描写」を娯楽として消費する構造です。
タイトル・キャラクター名が一致しているため、検索すれば原作読者である少年層が成人向けBL二次創作に容易にアクセス可能です。
現実としてSNSでゾーニングが機能せず、少年読者が自分と同年齢のキャラの性描写に出会う危険性は高く、実際にそのような被害は発生しています。
少年がブックオフで知っているキャラクターの本を手に取ったら性的描写のどぎつい二次創作BLのアンソロジーコミックで、置かれているコーナーはR18ではない一般書コーナーだった、等のゾーニング失敗事例が現実でもネットでも起こっています。
原作において異性愛的関係性で描かれていた少年キャラが、「攻め・受け」のセックス記号として加工され、ゲイという性的マイノリティが「架空の性癖」として消費されている。
これは、実在するゲイ男性の人格・関係性・歴史的背景を剥奪し、快楽のための性的ステレオタイプとして記号化している。
少年BLにおいて描かれる「少年らしさ」や「ゲイ性」は、成人の異性愛女性にとって“性的に都合のよいもの”として設計されている。
これは、男性による女性の性的客体化（ポルノグラフィ）と構造的に同一であり、女性が「表現者」であってもその加害性は無効化されない。
原作の著作権者の中には、二次創作、とりわけ性的な二次創作に対して明確に拒否や違和感を表明している作家が複数います。
作品の意図やキャラ性を歪める改変は、「同一性保持権」の侵害にあたる場合があり、著作権法上も違法性が高い行為です。
日本の著作権法において、二次創作は著作権者の許諾なしでは原則として違法。
市場慣行上、暗黙の了解が存在する分野もありますが、性的表現や未成年キャラを対象とする場合は、「公序良俗違反」として権利者が訴えた場合、法的責任を問われる可能性が極めて高いです。
をすべて内包しており、倫理的・法的・社会的に持続可能な表現活動とはいえない。
創作の自由や性的ファンタジーの権利は、他者の尊厳・権利・現実に損害を与えない限度内で初めて正当化される。
自作PCを10年前ぐらいからやってて未だに疑問に思うんだけど、何で自作ノートPCが全然普及しないんだろ。
え、市販のノートPCとか、もしゲームもしたいならゲーミングノートPCとか買えば良いじゃん？って言うんだろうけど、
まあメモリやSSDは交換できるノートPCはあるけど、電源とかGPUは交換できるの無いじゃん。
それだと最新のゲームがやりたいがスペック不足…という場面で、買い替えせざるを得なくて出費大きいし勿体ないんだよ。
自作ノートPCがあれば電源とGPUを良い物に交換できるんだから、買い替えより安く済むじゃん。
一応、frameworkっていうカスタマイズ可能な自作ノートPCはあるっちゃあるけど、それぐらいしか選択肢が無い。しかも競争相手居ないからかめちゃくちゃ価格高めに設定されてて買う気失せる。
VitaにCFWを導入するにあたり、情報が散乱していたのでまとめる
・2022年末に革新的進歩があり、VITA単体でCFW導入できるようになった（通称 HENlo）
・にも関わらず古いCFW導入方法を案内しているブログが大量にある
・しかもタイトルの"20XX年最新"だけ更新し続けているから、最新記事に見える
↓
PC使用が前提になっているブログは全部古いので無視した方が良いです。
・『HENlo』について触れている
この2つが押さえられてれば最新情報です。（2025年5月現在）
ただし、現状だと実は『PC操作が一部必要』という罠があります。
その問題について書いている記事が見当たらないので、ここに残しておきます。
超具体的には
「HENkaku、VitaDeploy、VitaShellは導入できた」
「けどEnso導入ができない/つまづいている」 エラー：failed togetfwversion please disableallthe plugins andtryagain
5chでもRedditでも
『プラグインを無効にしろ』『0syscall6を無効にしろ』って書いてあったのですが、実はEnsoのバージョン変えれば解決します。（後述）
この記事が役に立ちました
[Vita]2023年最新手順【HENlo】3.65-3.74PC不要でCFW(HENkaku)導入
https://re-doing.com/vita-henlo-hack/
（一応魚拓：https://web.archive.org/web/20250226111105/https://re-doing.com/vita-henlo-hack/）
・HENkaku （カスタムファームウェア 3.65 変革 -2）
・VitaDeploy
・VitaShell
・最悪文鎮化する可能性があるのでセーブデータバックアップを取ったほうが良い
・VITAのセーブデータは特殊で、PCと繋ぐだけでは取り出せない
・バックアップにはいくつか方法があるが、PCのコンテンツ管理アシスタントは既に使えないと思ったほうが良い。PS Plusのクラウドバックアップが最も良いはず
・記事の内容を実施する前にバックアップ取るのを強くおすすめする
これをインストールすることで、電源を切ってからもCFW状態を維持できます。
VitaDeploy内のApp downloaderメニューからEnsoをインストールできますが、実はこのバージョンが古いです。※重要※
そのためVitaDeployからインストールすると先程のエラー（failed togetfwversion please disableallthe plugins andtryagain）が必ず出ます。
「PC不要になった」と書いてあったので盲点ですが、ここからPC必要です。
正しい方法は以下です
1,PC操作：GithubからEnso最新版のenso.vpkファイルをダウンロード（現在v1.1）
https://github.com/TheOfficialFloW/enso/releases
2,PCとVitaをUSBケーブルで繋げる ※データ転送対応ケーブルを使うこと。相性もある
5,PC操作：USBドライブとしてVITAのデータが表示されるので、ダウンロードしていたenso.vpkファイルを置く（フォルダはどこでもOK。自分はルート直下に置きました）
7,Vita操作：VitaShellでenso.vpkを見つける（さっきルートに置いたなら恐らくux0:にある）
9.Vita操作：Doyou want toinstall this package? → ◯ボタン
10.Vita操作：~~~ Wouldyoulike tocontinue theinstall? ※意訳：「失敗したら文鎮化するけど自己責任だけど続ける？」 → ◯ボタン
11. 進行バーが消えたらインストール完了 ホーム画面に戻ってOK
Ensoはファームウェアが3.60か3.65じゃないとインストールできないです。（3.65 変革 -2は3.65扱い）
先程の記事の通り進めていたら3.65 変革 -2 になっているはずですが、実行前に再確認して下さい。
1, ~~~ PressCIRCLE toaccept these terms orany otherkey to notaccept. → ◯ボタンを押す（=CIRCLE ）
2, Options：
CROSS Install /reinstall thehack.
SQUARE Fix bootconfiguration (choose this if taiHEN isn't loadingon boot).
CIRCLE Exit without doinganything.
Locking sustem ..
（中略）
Theinstallationwas completed successfully.
suocess.
MBRwas detected butinstllation checksum dose notmatch.
Adumpwas createdat ux0:data/blocks.bin.
Press X tocontinue,any othekey toexit.
意訳：「ちょい待った。思ってた構成じゃないから危ないかもしれんわ。続ける？」
→✕ボタンを押す ※結局原因分かってないので自己責任でお願いします※
4,Locking sustem ..
（中略）
Theinstallationwas completed successfully.
suocess.
Enso導入が成功していると
・ファームウェアが3.65 変革 -2のままなっている
お疲れ様でした。
記事の本題は以上です。
VITAのセーブデータは暗号化されており、吸い出せてもエミュレータで使えないらしい。本体機体とセットで揃わないと使えない仕様。
調べたらセーブデータをここまでキツく縛ってるハードは他にない
だからメモリーカードのデータ管理でもPSPのセーブデータしか項目がなかったのか…
不便すぎる
当時の仮説
・HENkaku設定が悪さをしているのではないか（PSNの偽装を有効化、バージョンの偽装を有効化） →オフにしたが関係なかった
・本体にSD2VITAを刺しているのが良くないのではないか →抜いたが関係なかった
・enso.vpkの置き場所がルート（ux0:）が良くなかったのではないか →関係なかった
・VITAにメモリーカードを刺しているのが良くないのではないか →関係なかったが、データ保護的には抜くのが良さそう
・ゴミデータが残っていて悪さしているのではないか（手順を間違えたデータや古いデータなど） →関係ある可能性はある。最後までわからず
・Ensoのバージョンが古いのではないか →これが主要因だった
ゴミデータを疑った自分は正規のファームウェアに戻して、CFW化をやり直したりもした。
その際HENkakuすら入れられなくなってしまったので、抜け方を書いておく。
ENSO実行
↓
~~~ PressCIRCLE toaccept these terms orany otherkey to notaccept. → ◯ボタンを押す（=CIRCLE ）
↓
Options：
CROSS Install /reinstall thehack.
SQUARE Fix bootconfiguration (choose this if taiHEN isn't loadingon boot).
CIRCLE Exit without doinganything.
→ △ボタンを押す（=TRIANGLE Uninstall thehack.）
↓
↓
↓
ファームウェアアップデートが促され、アップデートしないとメモリースティックが使えない
↓
↓
↓
HENloメニュー
・Exit
↓
「Eiting in 3」 の後に、以下のエラーメッセージがでて固まってしまう
Ifyou are stuckon thisscreen, hold downthe power button untilyourVita turns off, then turnit backon.
原因：恐らく余計なデータと衝突を起こしてる
（さっきのエラーメッセージ画面で）
↓
セーフモードが起動する
↓
↓
↓
HENloメニュー
・Exit
↓
その後
Install HENkaku、InstallVitaDeployを選択して、Exitを選択
この記事を書き終えた後に見つけたのですが、以下の記事の『改造方法』というところに情報がかなりまとまっています
Vita バージョンが低くてもPSNにサインイン＆PSストアにアクセス(エラーNW-8942-3回避)＆機器認証する方法(2025最新)
https://yyoossk.blogspot.com/2024/10/vitapsnps2024.html
今回VITAのセーブデータバックアップが主目的だったから、徒労でしかなかった
指摘、補足、最新情報あれば反応もらえるとありがたいです
Speed,SEO, scalability, and developer productivity aremore critical than ever. While React.js remains a powerhouse forbuilding interactiveuser interfaces, many businesses and developers arenow leaning towardNext.js for complete, production-ready solutions.So what exactly makesNext.js amore favorable choiceover React.js in 2025?Let’s explorethe reasons in detail.
🧱 React.js vsNext.js:Core Distinction
React.jsis aJavaScript library focused solelyonbuildingUI components.
Next.jsis a full-fledgedframework builtontop of React that includeseverythingyouneed for production — routing,SSR,SEO optimization, static site generation, andmore.
In essence, React givesyou the tools to build aninterface, whileNext.js givesyou thestructure to build, deploy, andscale a completewebapplication.
🚀Key Advantages of ChoosingNext.js in 2025
1. Built-in Server-Side Rendering (SSR)
3. Hybrid Rendering Capabilities
5.Image & Font Optimization
This alignsperfectly withGoogle’sperformance guidelines in 2025. React.js doesn’t offer this natively.
7. Enhanced Developer Experience
Next.jshas evolved intoone ofthe most developer-friendlyframeworks in 2025, backedby the Vercelecosystem.In 2025,Next.js standsoutas the smarter, faster, andmore scalable solution forbuilding modernwebsites andwebapplications.It inheritseverything great about React —and addsstructure, optimization, and production-readiness. Ifyou’re planning to build awebsite that demands speed,SEO,and a seamless development process,Next.jsis the clear choice.
Formore details read this informative article:https://www.nimblechapps.com/blog/choosing-nextjs-over-reactjs-for-website-development
Please consider the histroy ofhumanity from biologicalperpsecitve and currentknown fact in nearbyuniverse, whichexpo-planet (from theSol systemperspective)ismostlikely to have civlizaedsociety? Pleaseaddpercentagenext toit in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanetcivilizationlikelihoodを28 秒行う
OK, I’mlookingatthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon an exoplanet within ourSolar System.I’ll consider biologicalhistory and current space knowledge,aiming to identifythe most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from ourSolar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard'sStar, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1,focusingon their habitablezonesand available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilizedsocietylikelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m notingkey exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which haveEarth-like characteristicsand are in habitablezones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advancedcivilizations.
I'm gathering infoonplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, consideringfactorslikemagneticfields,atmospheres, and proximity to G-typestars for their potential to support advancedcivilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despitebeing closeand around ared dwarfstar, might supportlife ifithas amagneticfieldand atmosphere. This makes me think aboutits potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimatingcivilization probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculativepercentagesbasedon the Drake equation and the lack ofevidence for intelligentlife.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names andcivilizationlikelihoodpercentages, grounded in the longtimeline oflife'sevolution, despite the speculativenature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering theirstar types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advancedcivilizations from oursolar system'sviewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due toits closeness and observational potential, despite concerns aboutitsflarestar dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'mfocusingon exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, andK2-18b,aiming to chart theirlikelihood of hosting a civilizedsocietybasedon current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety, consideringEarth's long biologicalhistory.
Refining odds
I'm considering theastronomicaltimeline for intelligentlifeonEarth,leading me toassign evenlower speculative odds for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrarypercentages, clearly noting the speculativenature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience'sbasic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrarypercentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculativenature, and ensuring the datais accessible foryoung audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating amarkdowntable with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of civilizedlifeon exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoreticalnature and considering the understandinglevel of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mappingout amarkdown chart with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon exoplanets, mindful of thecomplexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecingtogethermarkdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b'sreduced civilizedlife chance due to thered dwarf's activity. This inclusionhighlights the speculativenature of the analysis.
Piecingtogether speculative odds
I’m detailing amarkdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanetlikelihoods, considering environmental challengesand adding a disclaimer about the speculativenature and lack ofevidence.
Piecingtogether
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b forits proximity and silentstar, butI’lladd a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advancedcivilizations' hypotheticallikelihood.
Assessingcivilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligentlifeonEarth, which suggests that the odds ofany habitableplanet developing acomplexcivilization might beaslowas a fewpercent.
Belowis a very speculative chart that—basedon what we know aboutEarth’s long, windingpath fromsimplelife to a “civilizedsociety” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives somefun,made‑uppercentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists havenot yetfoundany proof oflife (let alone advancedcivilizations)onany exoplanet. Thesenumbers are just playful estimates to helpyou think about theideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an AdvancedCivilizationon Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet EstimatedLikelihood of a CivilizedSociety
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
HowDid We (Very Roughly) Guess TheseNumbers?
Earth’s Example:
OnEarth,life beganassimple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that builtcomplex societies. This longjourney suggests that—even if aplanetis in the “habitablezone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilizedsociety might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
Thisis the closest exoplanet to us. Even thoughitsstar (Proxima Centauri)is ared dwarf that sometimes sendsout strongflares (which might harmlife),its closeness makesitone of ourmost interesting candidates. That’swhy we giveit a slightly higher guess (~2%).
Theseplanets are part of agroup orbiting a verycoolstar. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaningone sidealwaysfaces thestar), so the chance of acomplex, advancedcivilization might be abitlower.
LHS 1140 b:
Thisplanetis promising in some ways butis alittle fartherawayand around a dimmerstar, so our playful estimateis evenlower.
All of thesepercentages are extremely rough guessesbasedon whatlittle we understand about the conditions forlife andintelligence. Scientists useideaslike the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concreteevidence, thesenumbers remain just forfun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring theseideas—and remember, spaceis full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equationitself and see if this euqationis acculate ormore opition in the equationyouwill use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation'svalue
OK, let me see. The Drake Equationisn't a precise formula;it'smore of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluatingits conceptualnature,its uncertain parameters, andits criticism to concludeonits reliabilityas an accurate predictivemodel.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mappingout the Drake Equationas a conceptual guide, detailingits parameters, which are oftenbasedon estimates or opinions, to evaluateits reliability for predicting extraterrestrialcivilizations.
The Drake Equationis a famous formula thatwas created to help scientists think about the manyfactors involved in estimating thenumber of detectable extraterrestrialcivilizations in ourgalaxy. However, when welookat the equation closely, we see thatitismore of a conceptualframework or heuristictool than a precise, predictive formula.Let’sbreak downwhy:
The equationis usually writtenas:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The averagerate ofstar formationper year in ourgalaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of thosestars that haveplanetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The averagenumber ofplanets that could potentially supportlifeperstar withplanets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of thoseplanets wherelife actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction ofplanets withlife where intelligentlife evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction ofcivilizations that develop technology that releases detectablesignals into space.
𝐿
L: The length oftime suchcivilizations release detectablesignals.
Why the Drake EquationIsMore of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction ofstars withplanets), have become better known through modernastronomy.
The parameters related to the development oflife andintelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—arebasedon very limited data. For example,Earthis theonlyplanet we know wherelifehas developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for thesefactors. This means that thevalues chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of PossibleValues:
Because many of thesefactors are not well-constrained, ifyouchangeone of themore uncertain parameters even slightly, thefinal estimate for
𝑁
N (thenumber ofcivilizations) can varyby many orders ofmagnitude. This wide range shows that the equation canlead to very differentoutcomesbasedonpersonal or theoreticalassumptions.
The Drake Equationwas never meant to provide a preciseanswer. Instead,it servesas a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrialcivilizations.It encourages discussion about the relative importance of differentfactors andhighlights where our scientific knowledgeis limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate orMore Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In thesense ofbeing a strict mathematicalmodel with well-defined inputs and predictableoutputs, the Drake Equationis not accurate.Its accuracyis limitedbythe extreme uncertainties in several ofitskey parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning theevolution oflife andintelligence, arebasedon opinion, interpretation, and the single example ofEarth. Therefore, while thestructure of the equationis logical, thenumbersyou put intoit (and hence thefinal result) are oftenmore reflective of our current opinionsand assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equationis a valuabletool for framing the question of extraterrestriallife.It helps scientists and enthusiastsbreak down acomplex problem into smaller,more manageable questions. However, because several ofitsfactors are highly uncertain and subject topersonal interpretation,itismore of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of thenumber of extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Insummary, while the Drake Equationis useful for thinking about the variousfactors that mightlead to the emergence of acivilization,itsoutputs should betakenas highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the longhistory ofSol system and nearbyplanets and see if thereisany possiblites that inonetime intelligentlife emerged in nearbyplanets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-humanintelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-humanintelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligentlife forms in theSol system and neighboringplanets, and how this mightfactor into the equation.
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligentlife, possiblyonMars orEuropa, into the Drake Equation for theSol system and neighboringplanets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligentlife emergingonMars orVenus, thoughEarth remains theonly knownlife-supportingplanet in thesolar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligentlife could have emergedonplanetslikeMars,Venus, orEuropa, and how thispossibility alignswith the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligentlifeonMars orVenus could intersectwith theassumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems tofocussolelyonEarth-basedevolution.
I’m piecingtogether the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligentlife in thesolar system.Mars,Venus, and Titan present challenges, butEuropa and Enceladus might harbor microbiallife.
Please consider the histroy ofhumanity from biologicalperpsecitve and currentknown fact in nearbyuniverse, whichexpo-planet (from theSol systemperspective)ismostlikely to have civlizaedsociety? Pleaseaddpercentagenext toit in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanetcivilizationlikelihoodを28 秒行う
OK, I’mlookingatthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon an exoplanet within ourSolar System.I’ll consider biologicalhistory and current space knowledge,aiming to identifythe most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from ourSolar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard'sStar, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1,focusingon their habitablezonesand available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilizedsocietylikelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m notingkey exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which haveEarth-like characteristicsand are in habitablezones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advancedcivilizations.
I'm gathering infoonplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, consideringfactorslikemagneticfields,atmospheres, and proximity to G-typestars for their potential to support advancedcivilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despitebeing closeand around ared dwarfstar, might supportlife ifithas amagneticfieldand atmosphere. This makes me think aboutits potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimatingcivilization probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculativepercentagesbasedon the Drake equation and the lack ofevidence for intelligentlife.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names andcivilizationlikelihoodpercentages, grounded in the longtimeline oflife'sevolution, despite the speculativenature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering theirstar types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advancedcivilizations from oursolar system'sviewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due toits closeness and observational potential, despite concerns aboutitsflarestar dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'mfocusingon exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, andK2-18b,aiming to chart theirlikelihood of hosting a civilizedsocietybasedon current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety, consideringEarth's long biologicalhistory.
Refining odds
I'm considering theastronomicaltimeline for intelligentlifeonEarth,leading me toassign evenlower speculative odds for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrarypercentages, clearly noting the speculativenature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience'sbasic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrarypercentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculativenature, and ensuring the datais accessible foryoung audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating amarkdowntable with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of civilizedlifeon exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoreticalnature and considering the understandinglevel of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mappingout amarkdown chart with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon exoplanets, mindful of thecomplexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecingtogethermarkdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b'sreduced civilizedlife chance due to thered dwarf's activity. This inclusionhighlights the speculativenature of the analysis.
Piecingtogether speculative odds
I’m detailing amarkdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanetlikelihoods, considering environmental challengesand adding a disclaimer about the speculativenature and lack ofevidence.
Piecingtogether
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b forits proximity and silentstar, butI’lladd a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advancedcivilizations' hypotheticallikelihood.
Assessingcivilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligentlifeonEarth, which suggests that the odds ofany habitableplanet developing acomplexcivilization might beaslowas a fewpercent.
Belowis a very speculative chart that—basedon what we know aboutEarth’s long, windingpath fromsimplelife to a “civilizedsociety” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives somefun,made‑uppercentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists havenot yetfoundany proof oflife (let alone advancedcivilizations)onany exoplanet. Thesenumbers are just playful estimates to helpyou think about theideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an AdvancedCivilizationon Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet EstimatedLikelihood of a CivilizedSociety
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
HowDid We (Very Roughly) Guess TheseNumbers?
Earth’s Example:
OnEarth,life beganassimple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that builtcomplex societies. This longjourney suggests that—even if aplanetis in the “habitablezone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilizedsociety might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
Thisis the closest exoplanet to us. Even thoughitsstar (Proxima Centauri)is ared dwarf that sometimes sendsout strongflares (which might harmlife),its closeness makesitone of ourmost interesting candidates. That’swhy we giveit a slightly higher guess (~2%).
Theseplanets are part of agroup orbiting a verycoolstar. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaningone sidealwaysfaces thestar), so the chance of acomplex, advancedcivilization might be abitlower.
LHS 1140 b:
Thisplanetis promising in some ways butis alittle fartherawayand around a dimmerstar, so our playful estimateis evenlower.
All of thesepercentages are extremely rough guessesbasedon whatlittle we understand about the conditions forlife andintelligence. Scientists useideaslike the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concreteevidence, thesenumbers remain just forfun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring theseideas—and remember, spaceis full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equationitself and see if this euqationis acculate ormore opition in the equationyouwill use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation'svalue
OK, let me see. The Drake Equationisn't a precise formula;it'smore of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluatingits conceptualnature,its uncertain parameters, andits criticism to concludeonits reliabilityas an accurate predictivemodel.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mappingout the Drake Equationas a conceptual guide, detailingits parameters, which are oftenbasedon estimates or opinions, to evaluateits reliability for predicting extraterrestrialcivilizations.
The Drake Equationis a famous formula thatwas created to help scientists think about the manyfactors involved in estimating thenumber of detectable extraterrestrialcivilizations in ourgalaxy. However, when welookat the equation closely, we see thatitismore of a conceptualframework or heuristictool than a precise, predictive formula.Let’sbreak downwhy:
The equationis usually writtenas:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The averagerate ofstar formationper year in ourgalaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of thosestars that haveplanetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The averagenumber ofplanets that could potentially supportlifeperstar withplanets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of thoseplanets wherelife actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction ofplanets withlife where intelligentlife evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction ofcivilizations that develop technology that releases detectablesignals into space.
𝐿
L: The length oftime suchcivilizations release detectablesignals.
Why the Drake EquationIsMore of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction ofstars withplanets), have become better known through modernastronomy.
The parameters related to the development oflife andintelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—arebasedon very limited data. For example,Earthis theonlyplanet we know wherelifehas developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for thesefactors. This means that thevalues chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of PossibleValues:
Because many of thesefactors are not well-constrained, ifyouchangeone of themore uncertain parameters even slightly, thefinal estimate for
𝑁
N (thenumber ofcivilizations) can varyby many orders ofmagnitude. This wide range shows that the equation canlead to very differentoutcomesbasedonpersonal or theoreticalassumptions.
The Drake Equationwas never meant to provide a preciseanswer. Instead,it servesas a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrialcivilizations.It encourages discussion about the relative importance of differentfactors andhighlights where our scientific knowledgeis limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate orMore Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In thesense ofbeing a strict mathematicalmodel with well-defined inputs and predictableoutputs, the Drake Equationis not accurate.Its accuracyis limitedbythe extreme uncertainties in several ofitskey parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning theevolution oflife andintelligence, arebasedon opinion, interpretation, and the single example ofEarth. Therefore, while thestructure of the equationis logical, thenumbersyou put intoit (and hence thefinal result) are oftenmore reflective of our current opinionsand assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equationis a valuabletool for framing the question of extraterrestriallife.It helps scientists and enthusiastsbreak down acomplex problem into smaller,more manageable questions. However, because several ofitsfactors are highly uncertain and subject topersonal interpretation,itismore of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of thenumber of extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Insummary, while the Drake Equationis useful for thinking about the variousfactors that mightlead to the emergence of acivilization,itsoutputs should betakenas highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the longhistory ofSol system and nearbyplanets and see if thereisany possiblites that inonetime intelligentlife emerged in nearbyplanets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-humanintelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-humanintelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligentlife forms in theSol system and neighboringplanets, and how this mightfactor into the equation.
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligentlife, possiblyonMars orEuropa, into the Drake Equation for theSol system and neighboringplanets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligentlife emergingonMars orVenus, thoughEarth remains theonly knownlife-supportingplanet in thesolar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligentlife could have emergedonplanetslikeMars,Venus, orEuropa, and how thispossibility alignswith the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligentlifeonMars orVenus could intersectwith theassumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems tofocussolelyonEarth-basedevolution.
I’m piecingtogether the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligentlife in thesolar system.Mars,Venus, and Titan present challenges, butEuropa and Enceladus might harbor microbiallife.
In the labyrinthine realm ofdigital content dissemination, an enigmatic phenomenonhas surfaced, challenging our axioms regarding thenexusbetween contentubiquity andviewer cognitive acumen. This disquisition endeavors to elucidate the paradoxical inverse correlationbetween videoviewership metrics and the intellectual quotient of the audience, propounding that audiovisual content amassing prodigiousview counts tends tocaptivateviewers with a meanIntelligence Quotient (IQ) of 100, while theirmore esoteric counterparts allure a demographic boasting an averageIQ of 120.
To fathom this counterintuitiveparadigm,one must first grapplewith the multifariousnature ofhumancognition and the intricate interplaybetween intellectual capacity and media predilections. This hypothesis, positing an inverse relationshipbetween a video's popularity and the meanIQ ofitsviewership, necessitates a rigorous examination of the underlyingpsycho-sociological and neurocognitive factors thatmay engender such a paradoxicaloutcome.
Theapplication of Cognitive LoadTheory to media consumption habits provides a plausible explication for this phenomenon. Videos achievingviral status often employ reductionist narratives and readily assimilable information, minimizing cognitive strain. Conversely, less ubiquitous videos may delve intomore abstruse subject matter, demanding heightened cognitiveengagementand amore sophisticated intellectualframework for comprehensive assimilation.
The pervasive influence of recommendation algorithms in content distribution platforms cannot be discounted in this analysis. These algorithmic arbiters, designed to maximizeuserengagement,may inadvertently engender epistemic bubbles that reinforce existing cognitive predispositions. Individuals with superiorIQsmay actively seekoutmore intellectually challenging or esoteric content, thereby circumventing the algorithmic propensity towards homogenization and cognitive stasis.
Itis imperative to consider the socioeconomic dimensions thatmay influence bothIQ development and media consumption patterns. HigherIQ individuals often correlate with elevated socioeconomic status, potentially affording them greateraccess to diverse epistemological resources and fostering a predilection formore intellectually stimulating content. This demographicmay be less susceptible to the allure of mainstream, highly-viewed videos that cater to a broader, less discerning audience.
The ramifications of this inverse relationshipbetweenviewership andviewerIQ are profound for content creators and platform developers alike.It challenges the prevailingparadigm that equates popularity with quality or intellectualvalue. Content creators targeting amore intellectually discerning audiencemayneed to recalibrate theirexpectations regardingview counts andengagement metrics, focusing insteadon cultivating a dedicated niche audience thatvalues cognitive stimulationover massappeal.
In summation, the observed dichotomybetween high-viewership videos attracting an audience with an averageIQ of 100 and their less popular counterpartsappealing toviewers with a meanIQ of 120 underscores thecomplex relationshipbetween intellectual capacity and media consumption in thedigitalage. This phenomenon necessitates a reevaluation of how we measure contentvalue and success in theonlinesphere, prompting amore nuanced approach to contentcreation,curation, and consumption that acknowledges the diverse cognitiveneeds of the audiencespectrum. The implications of thisparadigmshiftextend farbeyond mere metrics, touching upon fundamental questions of epistemology, cognitivediversity, and the verynature of intellectualengagement in thedigital era.
TheHatenaAnonymous Diary, while undeniably a distinctive fixture within thetapestry ofJapaneseinternet culture,has garnered substantial criticism forits content and the implications ofits operationalframework. This discourseaims to elucidatethe reasons underpinningits characterizationas "problematic."
At the crux of theHatenaAnonymous Diary'sappeal liesits hallmark feature: anonymity. Thisveil of secrecy ostensibly facilitates unrestrained discourse, allowing individuals to articulate their thoughts withoutfear of retribution. However, this very anonymity engenders aparadoxical effect;it cultivates an environment ripe for irresponsible commentary and vitriolic defamation. The absence of accountability diminishes thesense of responsibility that typically accompanies publicexpression, resulting in a proliferation of emotionally charged diatribes and baselessassertions. Such dynamics render the establishment of constructive dialogue increasingly elusive, thereby stifling meaningfulengagement.
Moreover, the content disseminated through theHatenaAnonymous Diary frequently exhibits a disconcerting superficiality. Many entries lack substantive depth, failing to provide rigorous analysis or innovative perspectives. Instead, they often succumb to the allure of trending topics or sensationalism, prioritizing ephemeral relevanceover intellectual rigor. This trend notonly undermines the potential for serious discourse but also contributes to a culture where shallowengagement withcomplexissues prevails. In an era markedby information saturation, this deficiency in content qualityis particularly egregious,asit detracts from the cultivation of critical thinking and informed debate.
Additionally, the cultural ramifications of this platform warrant scrutiny.By amplifying certain dominant narratives or viewpoints, there exists a palpable risk of erodingdiversity within public discourse. The emergence of "groupthink" within specific communities canlead to the marginalization of dissenting voices, creating anecho chamber that stifles pluralism. In such an insular environment, diverse perspectives are systematically excluded, resulting in a homogenized narrative that fails to reflect thecomplexities of societal discourse. This phenomenon notonly undermines individualexpression but also poses significant risks to theoverall health of democratic dialogue.
In conclusion, while theHatenaAnonymous Diary ostensibly champions freeexpression throughitsanonymousframework,it simultaneously fosters a milieu characterizedby irresponsibility and superficiality. The cultural influence wieldedby this platform raises critical concerns regardingitsimpactondiversity and social responsibility. Thus, characterizingitas "problematic"is not merely an exaggeration;itis an imperativerecognition ofits shortcomings. Moving forward,itis essential to scrutinize how this platform might evolveand address these inherent flaws in order to foster amore enriching and responsible discourse.
In the ever-evolving travel industry, travelportal have become fundamental tools for businesses looking to enhance customer experienceIt's streamline operations.With traveler increasingly relyingondigital platforms tobookeverything from flights tohotels, theneed for sophisticated,user-friendly,It's high-performing travelportalshas never beenmorecrucial. Thegrowth of this sectoris drivenby numerous factors, including technological advancements, consumer behaviorshifts,It's the quest fororganization. Thisarticle explores thetop trends in travelportals development that every business should pay attention to in 2024It'sbeyond.
1.ArtificialIntelligence andMachine Learning in TravelPortal Development
ArtificialIntelligence (AI) andMachine Learning (ML) have quickly become foundational components of travelportal development. These technologiesare revolutionizing the way businesses personalize services, predict consumer behavior, and optimizebooking processes.AI andML algorithms analyze large data sets to understand customers preferences,allowing for real-time customization of travel recommendations. From dynamic pricing models to
customized travel suggestions,AI help businesses offer an unequaleduser experience.
For instance,AI chatbotsare becoming successively popular for customer service. They cananswer customer queries24/7,assist inbookings,It's even provide real-time travel updates, enhancing the overall customers experience. Furthermore,AI-powered tools suchas a recommendation engines analyze pastbooking behavior to suggest tailoreditineraries, making travel planning much easier foruser.
2.Mobile-First Approach for TravelPortal Development
With the increasing use of smartphones,as amobile first approachis no longer optional for businesses in the travel industry.MoreIt'smoretravelersare relyingon their smartphones forbooking flights, boardinghouse,It'sactivitieson thego. For travelportals tostay competitive, ensuring seamlessmobile optimizationiscrucial.
Amobile optimized travelportal ensures thatusers haveaccess to the same features and functionalitieson theirmobile devicesas they wouldon adesktop.It’s not just about making the site responsive—it’s about creating an intuitive, fast, and easy to navigate experience. This includes featureslikemobile-specific payment options,mobilecheck-in forairlinesIt'shotels,It's easyaccess to customers support.
3. Integration of Blockchain for Secure Transactions
Blockchain technologyis makingwaves across various industries, and the travel sectoris no exception. Blockchain based travelportals offer a significant advantage whenit comes to securityIt's transparency. Blockchain’s ability to provide secure, tamper proof recordmakesit ideal for transactions involvingbookings, payment,It's loyalty program.
By integrating blockchain, travel businesses can ensure secureIt's fast transactions, protect customer data,It's reduce fraud. Blockchain also facilitates easierIt'smoretransparent loyalty program management.Travelers can accumulate rewards points across various service providers,all within the same blockchainframework, creatingas amore cohesiveIt's rewarding experience.
4. Enhanced Payment Solutions andDigital Wallets
One ofthe most significant changes in the travel industryhas been theshift toward contactless payment.Digital wallets, suchas aApple Pay,Google Wallet,It's cryptocurrency wallets,arenow widely accepted in travelportals. These payment solutions offer a faster,more secure,It's convenient way fortravelers to complete transactions.
For businesses, adopting multiple payment gatewaysis essential for attracting global customer.Internationaltraveler can faceissues with currencyexchangeIt's transaction fees, butby offering localized payment methodIt's supporting a wide range ofdigital wallets, businesses can significantlyimprove customerssatisfactionIt's retention.
5.Voice Search and VirtualAssistants
Voice searchisone ofthe fastest growing trends in the tech world, and the travel industryis no exception.Voice search optimizationis becoming an essential part of travelportal development.With therise of virtualassistantslikeAmazon’sAlexa,GoogleAssistant,It'sApple’sSiri,travelersare increasingly usingvoicecommand to search for flights,hotels,It'sdestinations.
For businesses, this means optimizing travelportals forvoice search.Voice-friendlyportal withnatural languageprocessing capabilities can provideusers withmore accurate resultsIt'smakebooking processes quickerIt's easier. Additionally, integrating virtualassistants intoportals can enhance customers servicebyansweringcommon queriesIt'sassisting withbookings.
6. AugmentedReality (AR) andVirtual Reality (VR) Experiences
(AR) and (VR) technologiesare transforming the waytravelers experiencedestinations and plan their trips. IntensifiedRealityallowstraveler toviewdestinations,hotel, or local attractions in realtime through theirmobile devices. For example, anAR feature in a travelportal couldallowuser totake a virtual tour of ahotel room or explore acity’s landmarks in3D.
Virtual Reality,on the other hand, cantransportusers to adestination before they evenbook their trip, providing immersivepreviews of their potentialvacation. Integrating (AR)It's (VR) into travelportal notonly elevates theuser experience but also drivesengagementby offeringsomething truly unique.
7. Customizable and Personalized Travel Packages
Personalizationiskey to standingout in the competitive travel industry.Travelerstoday expect customizable travel packages that cater to their uniqueneed and preferences. From flight choices tohotel rooms,activities,It's local experiences,organizationallows businesses to create tailored experiences that resonatewith their customer.
Advanced travelportal use customer data to offer customized deal, travelitineraries,It'sdestination recommendations.By analyzing pastbooking behaviorsIt's preferences, businesses can deliver highly relevant options, thus increasingthe likelihood of conversion. Offering dynamic packagingallowsusers tomix andmatch services basedon their preferences, creating amore flexibleIt's customizedbooking experience.
8. Sustainability andEco-Friendly Travel Options
As a coincidental concernscontinue torise,moretravelersare becoming mindful of theircarbon footprint. Sustainable travelhas become amajor trend in the tourism industry,It's businessesare respondingby incorporatingEco-friendly options into their travelportal. Whetherit’sbookingEco-conscious accommodations, flights with lowercarbon emissions, or supporting local sustainable experiences,travelersarenow seekingout environmentally responsible options.
Travelportals that emphasize sustainability and provide clear, detailed information abouteco-friendly optionsarelikely to attract a growing segment of conscientioustravelers. Businesses can also promote their commitment to sustainabilityby partnering withEco-friendly service providers and offeringtravelers the ability to offset theircarbon emissions.
9. Integration with Social Media andUser-Generated Content
Social media plays a pivotal role in travel decision making.More than ever,travelersare relyingonuser generated content (UGC)likereviews, photos, and videos from social platforms to guide their choices. Integrating (UGC) into travelportalsallows businesses totap into thissocial proofIt's build trust with potential customer.
For instance,allowingusers toshare their experiencesvia social media orreview platforms can provide valuable insights for othertravelers. Additionally, incorporating social sharing features within theportalsitself can encourageusers to engagewith your brandIt'sshare their travel experiences, thereby drivingmore traffic to theportal.
10.API Integrations and Multi-Channel Distribution
As the travel landscape becomesmore fragmented, travel businesses must offer a consistent experience across multiple channels.API integrationsarekey to ensuring that travelportals canaccess real-time data and distributeit across different platforms.APIsallow travelportal to integrate with global distribution system (GDS),airlines,hotels,car rental services,It's other travel-related services seamlessly.
By offering multi-channel distribution, business can maximize theirreach, whether throughdesktop websites,mobile app, or third party platformlike OTAs (Online Travel Agents). This integration also ensures real-time availability updateIt's better inventory management.
Source & Publishedby:https://www.namantechnolab.com/
Refuting the “Israeli” Claims Regarding Evading their responsibility for the Massacre of the Gaza Baptist Hospital
Today, the “Israeli” Occupation Entityistrying to evade their responsibility for the crime ofbombarding the “Baptist” ArabNational Hospital in GazaCity, which theIsraeli” Occupation Forces (IOF) committedon the evening of Tuesday,17October2023. This heinous crimewas committed against innocentPalestinian civilians while taking the hospitalas a shelter from theflames of the “Israeli” brutal aggression, which leftnowhere safe in the besieged enclave.Itis necessary to affirm that, the Baptist Hospital belongs to the Anglican Episcopal Church in Jerusalem, andwas built beforethe occupation ofPalestine.
Itis obvious that the “Israeli” enemyhas been spreading lies since the verybeginning ofhis destructivewaron our people, when he with no singleevidence claimed that thePalestinianresistance killed children, cut offheads and raped women. In continuation of this series of lies, they tried to evade their crime,attributingit toone of theresistancefactions. Accordingly, we present some of the conclusiveevidence to prove the “Israeli” Occupation Entity responsible for this heinous crime:
1)Itis nosecret that the IOF, severaldays ago, threatened several hospitals in the Gaza Strip, contacting each hospital separately and requesting their evacuation and holding the hospitalsdirectors responsible for the consequences of neglecting the threats. Infact, there are dozens of clearstatements from the IOF spokespersons in this regard.
2) Since thebeginning of theongoing aggression, the “Israeli” armyhas ignored the principle of distinguishingbetween civilian and military targets. Thus, thebombardmenthas systematically targetedemergency services, ambulances, civil defense facilities, schools, mosques, and churches.
3) The IOF contacted thedirectors of 21 hospitals in the Gaza Strip, especially those are located in the Gaza and the North of Gaza governorates,most notably: (Al-Awda, the Indonesian, Kamal Adwan, the Kuwaiti, Al-Quds,and Al-Mamadani),asking them to evacuate immediately, given that the hospitals are located within the geographicalscope of “Israeli” military operations. In this regard, theofficial spokespersons for the IOF plus anumber of hospitaldirectors conducted interviewsliveonAl Jazeera, revealing the premeditated intention of the IOF to target hospitals in the Gaza Strip.
4)On 14October,2023,at20:30, the IOFfiredtwo shells towards the Baptist Hospital, and thenext morning they called the hospitaldirector, Dr. Maher الصفحة 2 من 3
Ayyad, saying tohim: “Wewarnedyoulast eveningwith two shells, sowhy haveyou not evacuated the hospital until thismoment?!” Following that call, The hospitaldirector contacted the bishop of the Evangelical Church inBritain and informedhim of the incident,who in turn contactedinternationalorganizations before sending the hospital amessage reassuring them that they could remain in the hospital. Yet withno warning, the IOF airstrikes returned,on Tuesday evening, to carryout the massacre against the hospital and the shelter-seekers of the displaced innocentPalestinian civilians.
5) Immediately after the massacre, the IOF spokesperson quickly published astatementonhis pageon the “X” and “Telegram” platformsat 21:17, which stated, “We hadwarned the evacuation of the Baptist Hospital andfive other hospitals so that theHamas terroristorganization would nottakeas a safehaven”. Thatstatementis a clear claim of this massacre, anditis documented with a “screenshot”imageattached tohis pageon Telegram, but he quickly deleted the post after seeing the massivescale of the massacre for the largenumber of victims, and the angryresponses of the Arab, regional andinternational communities. Lateron, he disavowedit, publishanother
statement denying that he hadissued the firststatement.
6) Before and during the event, theresistancefactionsdid notfireany missilesatthe occupied territories, the “Israeli” sirensdid not activate, and the Iron Dome missiles were not launched.Moreover, dozens of reconnaissance drones do not leave thesky of the Gaza Strip (365 km2 ), photographing and monitoring every inch around the clock. If the massacrewas due to theresistance’s missiles,as the “Israeli” Occupation Entity falsely claim,why would not they showone picture their claims?!
7) The “Israeli” Occupation Entity claimed that this massacrewas causedby a missile launchedby theIslamic Jihad. However, we would wonder how they could identify and distinguishbetween the missiles of theresistancefactions immediately after they were launched?!
8) The IOF military system documents and recordsall their operationsby day, hour, minute and second, and inall previous times their mediaoutlets cameout to announce or deny much less severe massacres than this massacre,so whatmade them waitmore than 4 hours before declaring their irresponsibility other than weaving scenarios of falsification, lies and deception?!
9)Itis obviously known that theresistance’s missiles are somewhat “primitive” and do not have the destructivepower that kills hundredsatonetime. And throughout thehistory of previous confrontations and the current confrontation, noresistance missilehas caused a tenth of thisnumber of “Israeli” deaths.
10) Theonly video scene documenting themoment ofthe explosion reveals that the mass offlame and the sound ofthe explosion are identical to other “Israeli”bombs throughout thedays of theongoing aggression, which withno doubt proves that the “Israeli”origin of the missile.
الصفحة 3 من 3
The deliberateattackon hospitalsis awar crime, stipulated in Article (8, 2, b, 9) of the Statute of theInternational Criminal Court. Accordingly,Hamasofficially callson the Prosecutor of theInternational Criminal Court toopen an investigation into this crime, which falls within theframework of a genocidalwar, in accordancewith the provisions of Article 6 of theBasic Law. Thesebloody acts are also basedon the policy of denial pursuedby the “Israeli” Occupation Entity,as they denythe existence of thePalestinian people.
Thereisno doubt that impunity fuels crime, and investigating crimesis a way to protect people. Furthermore, if a legal and judicialresponseis necessary,itis aboveall that theresponse to this crime must be humanitarian and global. Such actions mustshock the conscience ofthe world, or else there would no longer be a reliableinternational community if the “Israeli” Occupation government free to decide tobomb hospitals!
In conclusion, we are facing a genocidal massacre committedby IOF against children, women, and the elderly. The “Israeli” Occupation Entityis theonly responsible for the crime, no matter how much theytry to weave lies and fabrications togetaway withit,as theyalways do.
TheIslamicResistance Movement
「ガザ・バプテスト病院虐殺の責任回避に関するイスラエルの主張に反論する」
って題名
ChatGPT3.5だけど、英語でやってみたらやっぱりポンコツだった。赤太字は筆者注。
List somewords that startwith the letter A and end with N.(Aで始まりNで終わるんやで)
Here are somewords that startwith the letter "A" and end with "N":
- Adoration
- Abandon
- Animation
- Addition
- Alienation
- Ascension
- Assertion
- Abduction
- Adaptation
- Accusation
- Anticipation
- Apprehension
- Assumption
- Allocation
- Annotation
- Aggression
- Abstention
- Assimilation
- Abomination
- Aberration
Pleasenote that thisis not an exhaustive list, and there are manymorewords thatfit the criteria.
(ええやん。できてるやん。やっぱ英語だといけるんかな？)
Nice. Let'saddonemore condition.It should be in6 letters.(6文字条件を追加やで)
Certainly!Here are some six-letterwords that startwith the letter "A" and end with "N":
- Action
- Amount(ん？)
- Autumn
- Absurd(ん？)
- Arisen
- Auburn
- Apron(ん？)
- Austin
- Aspens(ん？)
- Airman
- Axiom(ん？)
- Amazon
- Aragon
- Aston(ん？)
- Ataman
- Aspnet(ん？)
- Alevin
Again, pleasenote that thisis not an exhaustive list, and theremay be other six-letterwords that meet the given criteria.
Thewordsyou listed contains some incorrectwords. List the incorrectones withits reasons.
Apologies for the errors in the previousresponse.Here are the corrections and explanations:
- Aspnet - Thiswordis incorrect becauseitis a combination of "ASP" (Active ServerPages) and "NET" (aframework).Itis not a standaloneword.(自分に厳しいやん。でもtで終わってる点はスルー？)
- Ataman - While "ataman"is a legitimateword,itis not ofEnglishorigin.It refers to a militarytitle orleader in certain Cossack communities.(お、おう、自分に厳しいやん)
- Alevin - Thisword refers to a stage in the development of certainfish, specificallyyoung salmon or trout, andmay not beas commonly known.(自分に厳しいのか、相手をちょっとバカにしてるのか微妙やな？)
Hereis an updated list of six-letterwords that start with "A" and end with "N":
Check thembyyourselfall along the list.
Apologies onceagain for the inaccuracies. Uponreviewing thewords, I realized that there areadditional errors.Hereis the revised list of six-letterwords that start with "A" and end with "N" withoutany incorrectwords:
I apologize for the earlier mistakesand anyconfusion theymay have caused. Thankyou for bringingit to my attention.(さっきのリストとまったく一緒やぞ)
Let's checkonebyone.
Apologies for the previous inaccuracies. Let'sgo through the listonebyone to ensure accuracy:
- Action - Correct
- Amount - Correct(？)
- Autumn - Correct
- Absurd - Correct(？)
- Arisen - Correct
- Auburn - Correct
- Aprons - Correct(？)
- Austin - Correct
- Aston - Correct(？)
Uponreviewing thewords individually, I can confirm thatall thewords listed are correct and meet the criteria of starting with "A" and ending with "N" while having a length of six letters.(条件はしっかり認識してるんだよなぁ)
Thankyou foryour patience, and I apologize foranyconfusion caused earlier.
Is "amount" correct?
Apologies onceagain for the oversight.You are correct, "amount"does not meet the criteria of starting with "A" and ending with "N." I apologize for the mistake.
Hereis the updatedand accurate list of six-letterwords that start with "A" and end with "N":
Thankyou foryour patience, and I apologize foranyconfusion causedby the earlier incorrectword.
(これ1つずつ消していかんとあかんのか…？)
Is "Absurd" correct?
Apologies onceagain for the mistake.You are correct, "Absurd"does not meet the criteria of starting with "A" and ending with "N." I apologize for the oversight.
Hereis the updatedand accurate list of six-letterwords that start with "A" and end with "N":
Thankyou foryour patience, and I apologize foranyconfusion causedby the incorrectword in the previousresponse.
Thereisoneword thatdoesn't satisfy the conditions evennow. Canyou identifyit?(最後の試練を与えたるで)
Apologies onceagain for the oversight. Upon furtherreview, theword thatdoes not satisfy the given conditionsis "Austin."Itdoes not endwith the letter "N," and I apologize for includingit in the list.
Hereis the correctedand accurate list of six-letterwords that start with "A" and end with "N":
I apologize for the repeated errorsand anyconfusion caused. Thankyou for bringingit to my attention.
Austinhas six letters.
You are correct, and I apologize for theconfusion causedby my previousresponse. "Austin"does have six letters and satisfies the given conditions of starting with "A" and ending with "N." I apologize for the mistake in my previous correction.
Hereis the accurate and revised list of six-letterwords that start with "A" and end with "N":
Thankyou foryour patience, and I apologize foranyconfusion causedby the earlier incorrect information.
Let's checkall thewordsby counting each letters.
Certainly, let'sgo through thewords and count the letters to ensure accuracy:
- Action - 6 letters
- Autumn - 6 letters
- Arisen - 6 letters
- Auburn - 6 letters
- Aprons - 6 letters
- Austin - 6 letters
- Aston - 5 letters(？)
Uponreviewing eachword individually,it appears thatall thewords listed have the correctnumber of letters,ranging from 5 to 6 letters, and meet the criteria of starting with "A" and ending with "N."(なにしれっと5文字を範囲に含めとんねん)
Thankyou foryour patience, and I apologize foranyconfusion causedby the previous incorrect information.
What doyou consider "the correctnumber of letters" in this situation?(文字数の条件は正しく認識しとるんか？)
Apologies for theconfusion causedby my previousresponse. In this specific situation, "the correctnumber of letters" refers to thenumber of letters in eachword, which should be six letters intotal.
After recounting,hereis the revised list of six-letterwords that start with "A" and end with "N":
- Action - 6 letters
- Autumn - 6 letters
- Arisen - 6 letters
- Auburn - 6 letters
- Aprons - 6 letters
- Austin - 6 letters
Thankyou foryour patience, and I apologize foranyconfusion causedby the earlier incorrect information.
(具体的に Aston が間違いだと指摘しなくても自分で気付けたのは偉いで…)
Good job.
Thankyou foryour understanding. I apologize for the initial mistakesand appreciateyour patience. Ifyou haveanymore questions orneed furtherassistance,feel free toask.
増田を全削除するのであればPowerAutomationDesktopかSeleniumIDEあたりでも使えば可能ですが、中にはブクマを集めた珠玉の増田やブクマは付かなくても割と気に入ってる増田もあるので全削除はしたくありませんでした。
Masuda Deleter
https://github.com/oribeolive/masuda-deleter/
Masuda DeleterはDockerコンテナに環境を作って動くのでDockerが必要です。
M1Macで動作していますがWindowsは検証できるマシンが手元にないので動作未確認です。
インストールはGitHubのREADMEに書かれたコマンドを実行すればできると思います。
Masuda Deleterははてラボにログインして指定されたページ分の自分の増田の投稿をスクレイピングしてローカルのDBに保存します。
取得された投稿のリストがブラウザで見られるので、そこで削除するものを選んで実行すると、またログインして投稿を削除しにいきます。
ページのアクセスごとに読み込みと遠慮のために1秒から数秒sleepするので少し時間がかかります。
一旦投稿をローカルに保存するという過程があるため副作用として自分の投稿を検索できます。
これにより
が容易になります。
増田にはAPIがないので、IDとパスワードを使ってログインして、表示されている文章をスクレイピングしてくるという原始的なやり方になります。
(2回目からはcookieがある場合はcookieを復元してログイン状態になります。)
ユーザーが知らない外部サイトにクレデンシャルを渡すのは危険であり、サービス運営側としてもパスワードを平文で持ちたくないので、Webサービスとして実装せずセルフサービスとしております。
ユーザーによってローカルの.envファイルに書かれたIDとパスワードを使用する形です。
ソースをオープンしておりますので怪しいことをしていないかも確認ができるかと思います。
一応下にプログレスバーが出ますが、ページ遷移すると見られなくなります。進捗は進捗管理でも確認できます。
取得された投稿はリアルタイムで画面に反映されないのでブラウザをリロードしてください。
増田のID、タイトル、本文の省略、投稿日時、ブクマ数、トラバ数が表示されます。
「あとで消す」投稿をチェックし、「あとで消す」記事をついに消すボタンで削除を実行します。
チェックは別のページに遷移しても有効です。
こちらは実行した時点で表示されているページのみリアルタイムに画面に反映されます。
投稿の全文を見られます。タグ等は取得しないのでテキストのみになります。
投稿を個別に取得してローカルの文章とブクマ数とトラバ数を更新します。
対象の投稿のタイトルを空に、本文をスペース1文字にしにいきます。
処理の進捗(何件中何件処理済みか)を見ることと、処理を停止させることができます。
排他処理(取込と取込、特定IDの削除と同じIDの削除等)にしているので動いていなそうな処理を停止して再度処理を実行するときに使います。
停止する場合は停止ボタンを押すか、それでも停止しそうにない場合は強制停止ボタンを押してください。
「停止」は今行っている最中の処理ではなく次以降の処理を停止するという形になります。
停止ボタンを押したときに4ページ目を取得している場合は、5ページ目の取得を始める前に処理を終了することになります。
そのためプロセスそのものが止まっている場合は停止されません。
「強制停止」はプロセスをkillします。スクリプト名とプロセスIDでプロセスを検索して子プロセスも含めてkillします。
おまけとして、投稿日とブクマ数、投稿日と3ブクマ以上の投稿の件数、投稿時間(hour)ごとの1ブクマ以上の投稿の件数のグラフが見られます。
ブクマが付いた瞬間ではなく投稿日時なので、いつの時期に投稿した、何時に投稿した増田が活きが良いのかを見られる程度です。
集計データを別に持っていないので増田を削除するとグラフに使用されるデータも消えます。
私はこれで多いときには4000件程度あった増田を3000件程度に減らしました。
これを開発する前からも増え続ける増田の削除に日々勤しんでいたので総数はもっと多いはず。
まだまだ削除したいです。
たまに
Message: unknownerror:net::ERR_CONNECTION_CLOSED
というSeleniumのエラーが出て処理が実行されないことがあります。再度実行してください。
フロントエンドがレガシーなのでMasuda Deleterの開発に飽きていなければもう少しモダンにリプレースしようと思っています。
「共通言語たるドメインモデルを、そのままコードと1対1対応しなければならない、という思い込みや風潮。
既存のWAF(WebApplicationFramework) の利点を潰してどうする…」
こういう誤った思い込みをエンジニアにさせているのは、ドメイン駆動設計の原典である「エリック・エヴァンスのドメイン駆動設計」が、いかに抽象的な内容で、ある意味では哲学的であったかを、明示するものでは無いか。
プログラムとはメタファーであり、現実を、もしくはそれに準ずる写像的な世界観を、コードに忠実に再現するものでは必ずしも無いと考える。この記事の増田は「過度な抽象化」とも書いているが、プログラムというか、そもそも言語そのものが物事の全てを表象できるものではなく、ある一側面の一イメージしか切り取れない不完全なものだし、それ自体が問題ではない。現実とソフトウェアの溝を、ユーザーとエンジニアの溝を、ドメインとソースコードの溝を、いかにして埋めるかというのが、ドメイン駆動設計の本質だし、その埋め方についてはエリックエバンスは一例を示しているに過ぎない。EntityやValueObjectなど、必要なら使えば良いし、不要なら使わなければ良いのだ。ただし、元々何が問題なのか、問題だったのかという点について、いかにして向き合うかが肝要であり、それは技術論や方法論の話ではない。
ドメイン駆動設計の記事を書いたり、勉強会で発表をしている人間は、原典やそれに付随するドキュメントの内容を、無批判に信奉し、そのようにしなければならないという強迫観念に追われているのではないか。そもそも、本当に理解しているか怪しいし、不安だから教科書の内容にしがみつこうとするのだろう。さらにこの手の連中は、昨今のCQRSやイベントソーシングやマイクロサービスなどとも絡めて話をし出すから、タチが悪い。「ドメイン駆動設計はこの手の技術スタックと相性が良い」という言葉を何度も見かけたが、技術的な方法論はそもそも無関係だったはずだし、そうやって安易に結びつけてしまうから、ユーザーが置き去りになって来たんじゃねーのと、暴言でも吐きたくなる。問題の本質はどこにあったのかを、聖典の内容や、流行り廃りの技術とは切り離して、エンジニアは三思九思すべきだ。
別にこうあらなければならないという法律や決まりは無いし、好きにやれば良い。モデルと1対1にならなければ、分割する事を選択するのも一つの向き合い方だ。ドメイン駆動設計の信者ににゃんにゃん写真でも撮られて、ばら撒くと脅迫されているのであれば勿論話は別だ。恥ずかしい写真を魚拓されたくなければ、とりあえずEntity、ValueObject、Repository、Service（笑）位は最低限、用意するのが身のためだろう。
自分の頭で考えて、自分の責任で判断するという当たり前の事に立ち返りたいものだ。ドメイン駆動設計という盲目的な宗教からいかにして抜け出すかが今後のエンジニアの課題だろう。
追伸
いい加減にしろ (1)
お前らが批判されてん (1)
がんばれ (1)
ご自愛ください (1)
ご都合の良い事で (1)
そう書いてるでしょ (1)
にゃがはら (6)
またこいつか (1)
もうやだ馬鹿の国 (2)
もう遅いけど (1)
オツムが残念 (1)
キャバクラに行け (1)
バカでは？ (1)
バカなの？ (1)
ブーメラン (1)
プライドないの？ (1)
ホモサピ未満 (1)
何とかの一つ覚え (1)
印象操作でした (1)
呼んでねぇから (1)
哀れな生物 (2)
普通解るじゃん (1)
永原◯聡 (1)
終わった国 (2)
自虐もウザい (1)
表現ではなく (1)
難癖付けた者勝ち (1)
顔真っ赤でワロタ (1)
