  |
はてなキーワード:focusとは
Thisis a detailed description of ananime-stylefemale character, designed for use in generating illustrations or animations with various poses. The character embodies a cute, energetic, and slightly quirky personality,fitting a schoolgirl or tech-savvytheme.Here are thekey features:
Hair:
Long, straight,platinum blonde hair that extends past the shoulders, reachingmid-back.
Hairis parted in themiddle,with two high ponytailson either side of the head.
Each ponytailis tied with large,red, mechanical or robotic-style hair accessories resembling small, spiked or angular devices (possibly hintingat a tech orsci-fitheme).
The hairhas a smooth, glossy texture typical ofanimeart, with slight highlights to emphasizeits brightness.
Eyes:
Large, expressivegreeneyes, typical ofanime-style characters, with a gentle upward curveat the corners, giving a friendly and cheerfulexpression.
Theeyes have visible eyelashesand a subtle sparkle orshine, enhancing the cute and youthful appearance.
Skin:
Fair, smoothskin with asoft, rosyblushon the cheeks,adding to the character’s youthful andlively vibe.
Outfit:
Wears agreen school blazer with awhitedress shirt underneath, typical ofJapanese school uniforms (seifuku style).
The blazerhas a structured, slightlyoversizedfit, with rolled-up sleeves, giving a casual yetstylishlook.
A purpleplaidskirt with rufflededges, complementing the schoolgirl aesthetic whileadding a playful touch.
A purplebackpack withcolorful, cartoonish patterns or stickers (possiblyfeaturing small, chibi-style characters or tech motifs) slungoverone shoulder.
Blackknee-high socks and darkshoes, completing the school uniformlook with aneat andtidy appearance.
Accessories:
Holding a black camera with both hands, positioned in front ofher chest, suggestingshe’s a photography enthusiast or documentingsomething.
A small, chibi-style plushtoy or mascot character (with spikyorange hairand a mischievous grin)attached toherbackpack,adding a quirky and playful element.
Thered mechanical hair accessoriesonher ponytails, which have a futuristic or robotic design, possibly glowing faintly orfeaturing smallLED-like details.
Pose andExpression:
Currently in a seated or slightly crouched pose, withlegsbent andoneknee raised, giving a relaxedand approachable demeanor.
Smilingsoftly with a closed-mouthsmile, exudingwarmth, friendliness,and a hint ofcuriosity or excitement (fitting forsomeone holding a camera).
Theoverallbody languageislively and dynamic, with a slighttilt of the head, emphasizingher youthful energy.
Background and Context:
The character appears in aclean, minimalbackground (possiblywhite orlight-colored) to keep thefocusonher, butshe couldfit into a schoolyard, tech lab, or urban setting withcherry blossoms or modern buildings, reflecting a blend of traditionalJapanese culture and futuristicthemes.
Thelightingissoft andnatural, with slight shadows toadd depth, maintaining ananime-style aesthetic.
The character suggests a blend ofinnocence and tech-savvycuriosity, possibly a schoolgirl with an interest in photography, robotics, orpop culture (inspiredby the mechanical hair accessories and camera).
Heroverall design balances cuteness (chibi plushtoy, school uniform) with a modern, quirkyedge (tech accessories, camera).
Thisscript can be usedas abase for generating images or illustrations of this character in various poses, suchas standing, walking, taking photos, interacting with others, or exploring different environments. Adjust the pose,background, oradditional props (like different camera angles or tech gadgets)as needed for specific scenes.
DEFINE SCENE: "anatomical_study_model"
SET PARAMETERS:
OBJECT_1: "female_unit", ATTRIBUTES: {height: 170cm, attire: "none", exposure_level:100%, pose: "upright_with_tilt_15deg"}
INTERACTION: "static_display", TARGET: {zone: "full_body", emphasis: "skin_surface_detail"}
ENVIRONMENT: "clinical_void", LIGHTING: "neutral_750lux",BACKGROUND: "solid_white"
EXECUTE RENDER:
DETAIL_LEVEL: "ultra_high"
FOCUS: "texture_and_form"
AVOID: "genital_explicitness"
OUTPUT: "static_image"
Let’s faceit: starting a conversationon a dating app canfeel terrifying.You seesomeoneyou’re interested in,you typeout amessage, and then…youdeleteit. “Is this too boring?” “Will they even respond?” “What if I sound awkward?”
We’veall been there. That firstmessage canmake orbreakyour chances ofconnecting withsomeone amazing. Buthere’s thegood news:youdon’t have tooverthink it.With the rightopeningline,you canspark a conversation thatfeelsnatural,fun, and meaningful.
AtMixerDates, webelieve that every greatconnection starts with a great conversation. That’swhy we’ve puttogether this guide to helpyoucraft the best dating appopeninglines—ones that standout, showyour personality, andlead to realconnections. Ready to ditch the “hey” and start making animpact?Let’sdive in!
[:contents]
Before weget into the bestopeninglines,let’stalk aboutwhyyour firstmessageis so important.
Youropeninglineisyour chance tomake a greatfirst impression.It’s thegateway to a conversation that couldlead tosomething special. A thoughtful,creativemessage shows thatyou’re genuinely interested—not just swiping mindlessly.
Your firstmessage sets thetone for the entire conversation. A boring orgenericopener mightlead to a dull chat, while afun or intriguingone canspark excitement andcuriosity.
Let’s be real: everyonelovesfeeling special. Whenyou put effort intoyouropeningline,it shows thatyou care enough to standout. AndonMixerDates, where wevalue authenticity and positivity, that effortgoes a long way.
Now,let’sget to thegood stuff—the best dating appopeninglines that actually work. These are divided intocategories to suit different personalities and situations.
Whilethe examples above are great starting points, the bestopeninglines are theones thatfeel authentic toyou.Here are sometips to helpyoucraftyour own:
Referencesomething from theirprofile—aphoto, a hobby, or ashared interest.It showsyou’re payingattention and not just copying and pasting.
Avoid heavy oroverly serious topics right off the bat. Keep thetonelight and playful tomake the conversation enjoyable.
Don’ttry to besomeoneyou’re not. Ifyou’renaturallyfunny, lean into that. Ifyou’remore thoughtful,go for asincere compliment or question.
“Hey” or “What’s up?” might be easy, but they’re also forgettable. Put in alittle effort to standout.
This gives the other person an easy way to respond and keeps the conversation flowing.
AtMixerDates, we’reall about creating a positive,inclusive space whereyou canfeel comfortablebeingyourself.Here’swhy our platformis the best place to put theseopeninglines into practice:
We welcome everyone, no matterwhoyou are orwhoyoulove. Our platformis designed to be a safe space whereyou canconnect withlike-minded people.
Our users create detailedprofiles thatmakeit easy to findshared interests andcraft personalizedopeninglines.
We encourage our community to be genuine and kind, soyou canfeel confident starting conversations withoutfear of judgment or rejection.
Don’t justtake ourword forit—here’s whatone of our users had to say:
“I met my partneronMixerDates, anditallstarted with asimplemessage about oursharedlove for travel. The conversation flowednaturally, and therestishistory. I’m so grateful for this platform!”
While a greatopeningline canspark a conversation,building a realconnectiontakesmore than just a clevermessage.Here are thekeyelements tolook for when seeking a meaningfulconnection:
A strongconnection starts with alignmenton the things that mattermost. Doyoushare similarvalues,lifegoals, or visions forthe future?
Look forsomeonewhoiswilling toshare their thoughts,feelings, and vulnerabilities—andwho encouragesyou to do the same.
Healthy relationships are atwo-way street. Both people should be putting in effort to communicate, plan dates, and support each other.
Atrueconnectionallows both people to be themselves without judgment.Look forsomeonewho celebratesyour uniqueness and encouragesyou to pursueyour passions.
Communicationis the foundation ofany strong relationship. A mutualconnection thrivesonhonesty, transparency, and the ability to resolve conflicts in ahealthy way.
AtMixerDates, we’rehere to helpyou find thesekeyelements in a partner. Our platformis designed toconnectyou with peoplewhoshareyourvaluesand arelooking for the same thingsyou are. Starting a conversationon a dating app doesn’t have to be stressful.With the rightopeningline,you canspark aconnection thatfeelsnatural,fun, and meaningful.And atMixerDates, we’rehere to helpyou everystep of the way.
So, what areyou waiting for?Craft that perfectopeningline,joinMixerDates, and startconnecting with peoplewhovalue authenticity and positivity.Your perfectmatchisout there—and they’re justonemessageaway.
Firstdates can be exciting and nerve-wrackingallatonce.You’re meetingsomeone new, learning about their interests, and trying to figureout if there’schemistrybetweenyou. And then there’s flirting, that delicate dance of showingsomeoneyou’re interested withoutbeing too forward or awkward.
Flirtingdoesn’t have to be a high-pressuresituation. Infact,it can bethe mostfun part ofgetting to knowsomeone. Whetheryou're meetingsomeoneonMixerDates orany other platform,the most important thingis to be genuine,staycalm, and let theconnection developnaturally.
Ifyou’ve everfoundyourself wondering how to flirton a firstdate withoutfeeling uncomfortable,you’re notalone. Everyonehas their awkwardmoments, but themoreyou understand theart of flirting, the easierit becomes. In thisarticle, we’llbreak down how to flirt in a way thatfeelsnatural, exciting,and authentic towhoyou are. So, let'sdive in and learn how tomakethe most ofyour firstdate experience—withoutoverthinkingit.
Whenit comes to flirting, confidenceiskey. But whatdoesit really mean to be confidenton a firstdate? Confidencedoesn’t meanyouneed to be perfect, or evenoutgoing—it simply meansbeing comfortable inyour ownskin and showing upasyour authentic self.
Haveyou ever noticed how people are drawn to thosewho radiate self-assurance?It’s not aboutbragging or dominating the conversation—it’s about presentingyourself with ease. Ifyoufeelgood aboutyourself,itwillnaturally show. A greatsmile,good posture, and eye contact cango a long way in making agoodfirst impression.
For instance, think about thelasttimesomeone walked into a room and immediately caughtyourattention—not because they werethe mostattractive person in the room, but because of their energy. They were confident, they were present, and theymadeyoufeelat ease. That’s the kind of confidenceyou want to projectonyourdate.
Whenyou're confident,you're not worried about saying the perfect thing. Instead,youfocuson enjoying themoment, making the other personfeel comfortable, and letting theconnection happennaturally. That’s themagic of confidence—itallowsyou to be present,fun, and,most importantly,yourself.
Let’s faceit—noonewants tofeellike they’rebeing “worked” or put through a game. That’swhy subtletyis such a powerfultool whenit comes to flirting.It'sall about showing interest withoutbeingover-the-top or too obvious.
Flirtingdoesn’talways mean complimentingsomeone non-stop or using cheesy pickup lines. Infact,the most successful flirtingis the kind that happens behind the scenes—subtle, playful, andlighthearted. Think about thelittlemoments,like a teasing comment about how theyalways order the same thingat a restaurant or the wayyou laughat a silly joke theymake.
Thekeyis to find a balance. Asimplesmile or a playful comment can convey interest withoutbeing too much. For example, ifyourdate tellsyou theylove hiking but theytend togetlost easily,you could saysomethinglike, “So,you’re telling meyouneed a personal guide? I couldget behind that!”It’slighthearted, humorous, andmost importantly,it keeps the conversationfun without putting too much pressureon thesituation.
By keepingit subtle,youallowyourdate tofeelat ease.Ittakes the pressure off them to be perfectand allows both ofyou to enjoy the interactionmorenaturally. Flirtingdoesn’tneed to be a performance—it’s about creating an environment where both ofyou canfeel comfortableand authentic.
Now,let’stalk aboutsomething incredibly important in the flirting game:active listening. When we’reon adate, we oftenget caught up in thinking about what to saynext, how we’re coming across, or if we’rebeing interesting enough. But the best way tomake animpression? Truly listening toyourdate.
Active listening meansyou’re fullyengaged in the conversation, givingyourdateyour fullattention and responding thoughtfully.It’s about showing thatyou care about what they’re saying and thatyou’re genuinely interested ingetting to know them better. Whenyou listenactively,you’re also giving them space toopen up, and that can create an immediateconnection.
For example, ifyourdate mentions they recently traveled toJapan, instead of simply saying, “That’scool!”you could follow up withsomethinglike, “Whatwasthe most memorable experienceyou had there?” This shows thatyou’re not just hearing their words but are genuinely curious and invested in their experiences.It’s a great way to build rapport and let them knowyou’re not just there toimpress them—you’re there toconnect.
Whileyour words are important,body language often speaks louder thananythingyou can say. Whetheryourealizeit or not,yourbodyis constantly communicating howyoufeel. Howyousit, stand, andmove tellsyourdate whetheryou’rerelaxed,engaged, or distracted.
Small gestures cango a long way in flirting. Alight touchon thearm, a subtle lean in when they’re speaking, or maintaininggood eye contact—all thesebody language cues helpsignalyour interest. Andthe great thingis, whendonenaturally, these cues can be justas effectiveas words.
For example, ifyou’resittingat a caféonyourdate andyou lean in slightly when they’re sharing afunnystory,you’re not just showing thatyou’re interested—you’re inviting them intoyour space.It’s aninvitation toconnect further. And when they respondby leaning in too, that’s when themagic happens—the unspokenconnection that tellsyou both that there’s potential formore.
Flirting throughbody languagedoesn’t mean making grand gestures orbeingoverly touchy.It’s aboutbeing present and showing thatyou’reengagedwith yourdate in a subtle, but meaningful way.
It’s easy toget caught up inoverthinking how to flirt or trying to figureout ifyourdateis intoyou. Buthere’s asecret—whenyou letgo of the pressureand allowyourself to havefun,everything flows muchmorenaturally. Flirtingon a firstdatedoesn’tneed tofeellike atest or anassignment.It’s supposed to be afun,lighthearted experience that sets the stage formore greatdates ahead.
Whenwas thelasttimeyou had a genuinelyfundate?Wasit whenyou were trying too hard toimpress, or whenyou were both laughing, chatting, and enjoying each other's company? Flirting becomes effortless whenyou're present, enjoying themoment, and letting theconnection grownaturally.
Sometimes,it's the smallmoments—like sharing a laugh or swapping embarrassing stories—thatmake a firstdate truly special. Whenyoufocuson havingfun,you create an environment where both ofyou canrelax, flirt, and let thechemistry grow. That’s thesecret to a greatdate.
One of the best things about using a platformlikeMixerDatesis thatittakes the guessworkout of the equation.Byconnecting withsomeonewho already sharesyour interests and values,you’vegot a head starton making a realconnection.No more swiping through countless profiles hoping for aspark—onMixerDates,you already know there’ssomething incommon.
Whenyou’re alreadyon the same pagewith yourdate, flirting comesmore easily. There’s less of that awkward, “Are we evenon the same wavelength?”feeling, andmore of thefun, “Wow, we reallyclick!” vibe. Whetheryou’retalking aboutfavorite hobbies, movies, orlifegoals, the conversation flowsnaturally, making the flirtingfeel effortless.
Ifyou're looking for a place to meetlike-minded people and build genuineconnections,MixerDatesis the perfect platform.It's a great place to findsomeonewho appreciatesyou forwhoyou are andwhoyou cannaturally flirt with, without the stress.
Flirtingon a firstdateisall about confidence,connection, andfun. Whenyou letgo of the pressure andfocuson enjoyingthe experience, thechemistrywillnaturally follow. Remember, the best way to flirtisbybeingyourself—letyour personalityshine through, listen with intention, and embrace themoment.
And ifyou’re ready to meetsomeone new,who’s justas interested in making aconnectionasyou are,MixerDatesis the perfect place to start. Sogo ahead,take theleap, and see whereit leads.Who knows?Yournext greatconnection might be just aclickaway.
Sign up forMixerDatestoday and startyourjourney to exciting firstdates and meaningfulconnections!
Zガンダムの評価は多岐に渡り、音楽もその一つですが、Zガンダムの失敗の原因が三枝成章氏の音楽が駄作だったせいであると断定することはできません。
Zガンダムの世界観に合致した音楽:三枝氏の音楽は、Zガンダムの複雑な人間関係やドラマティックな展開、そして戦争の悲しさを表現する上で、非常に重要な役割を果たしました。
印象的なBGM: 「Ζ・刻を越えて」「水の星へ愛を込めて」など、現在でも多くの人に愛される名曲を生み出しました。
マンネリ化: 前作のBGMと似た曲が多く、新鮮味に欠けるという意見もあります。
時代とのずれ:80年代中盤の作品ということもあり、現代の感覚からすると古臭く感じる部分もあるかもしれません。
Zガンダムの評価は、音楽以外にも、ストーリー展開、キャラクター描写、作画など、様々な要素によって左右されます。
ストーリーの複雑さ: 前作よりも複雑な人間関係や政治的な駆け引きが描かれ、視聴者によっては理解しにくい部分もあったかもしれません。
キャラクターの多さ: 多くのキャラクターが登場し、それぞれのドラマが描かれる一方で、focus が散漫になったという意見もあります。
作画の不安定さ:制作スケジュールが厳しかったこともあり、作画のクオリティが安定しない部分もありました。
Zガンダムの評価は、音楽だけでなく、様々な要素によって総合的に判断されるべきです。三枝氏の音楽は、Zガンダムの世界観を彩る上で重要な役割を果たしましたが、作品の評価を全て音楽のせいにすることはできません。
Please consider the histroy ofhumanity from biologicalperpsecitve and currentknown fact in nearbyuniverse, whichexpo-planet (from theSol systemperspective)ismostlikely to have civlizaedsociety? Pleaseaddpercentagenext toit in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanetcivilizationlikelihoodを28 秒行う
OK, I’mlookingatthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon an exoplanet within ourSolar System.I’ll consider biologicalhistory and current space knowledge,aiming to identifythe most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from ourSolar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard'sStar, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1,focusingon their habitablezonesand available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilizedsocietylikelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m notingkey exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which haveEarth-like characteristicsand are in habitablezones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advancedcivilizations.
I'm gathering infoonplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, consideringfactorslikemagneticfields,atmospheres, and proximity to G-typestars for their potential to support advancedcivilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despitebeing closeand around ared dwarfstar, might supportlife ifithas amagneticfieldand atmosphere. This makes me think aboutits potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimatingcivilization probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculativepercentagesbasedon the Drake equation and the lack ofevidence for intelligentlife.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names andcivilizationlikelihoodpercentages, grounded in the longtimeline oflife'sevolution, despite the speculativenature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering theirstar types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advancedcivilizations from oursolar system'sviewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due toits closeness and observational potential, despite concerns aboutitsflarestar dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'mfocusingon exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, andK2-18b,aiming to chart theirlikelihood of hosting a civilizedsocietybasedon current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety, consideringEarth's long biologicalhistory.
Refining odds
I'm considering theastronomicaltimeline for intelligentlifeonEarth,leading me toassign evenlower speculative odds for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrarypercentages, clearly noting the speculativenature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience'sbasic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrarypercentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculativenature, and ensuring the datais accessible foryoung audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating amarkdowntable with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of civilizedlifeon exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoreticalnature and considering the understandinglevel of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mappingout amarkdown chart with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon exoplanets, mindful of thecomplexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecingtogethermarkdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b'sreduced civilizedlife chance due to thered dwarf's activity. This inclusionhighlights the speculativenature of the analysis.
Piecingtogether speculative odds
I’m detailing amarkdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanetlikelihoods, considering environmental challengesand adding a disclaimer about the speculativenature and lack ofevidence.
Piecingtogether
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b forits proximity and silentstar, butI’lladd a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advancedcivilizations' hypotheticallikelihood.
Assessingcivilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligentlifeonEarth, which suggests that the odds ofany habitableplanet developing acomplexcivilization might beaslowas a fewpercent.
Belowis a very speculative chart that—basedon what we know aboutEarth’s long, windingpath fromsimplelife to a “civilizedsociety” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives somefun,made‑uppercentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists havenot yetfoundany proof oflife (let alone advancedcivilizations)onany exoplanet. Thesenumbers are just playful estimates to helpyou think about theideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an AdvancedCivilizationon Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet EstimatedLikelihood of a CivilizedSociety
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
HowDid We (Very Roughly) Guess TheseNumbers?
Earth’s Example:
OnEarth,life beganassimple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that builtcomplex societies. This longjourney suggests that—even if aplanetis in the “habitablezone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilizedsociety might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
Thisis the closest exoplanet to us. Even thoughitsstar (Proxima Centauri)is ared dwarf that sometimes sendsout strongflares (which might harmlife),its closeness makesitone of ourmost interesting candidates. That’swhy we giveit a slightly higher guess (~2%).
Theseplanets are part of agroup orbiting a verycoolstar. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaningone sidealwaysfaces thestar), so the chance of acomplex, advancedcivilization might be abitlower.
LHS 1140 b:
Thisplanetis promising in some ways butis alittle fartherawayand around a dimmerstar, so our playful estimateis evenlower.
All of thesepercentages are extremely rough guessesbasedon whatlittle we understand about the conditions forlife andintelligence. Scientists useideaslike the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concreteevidence, thesenumbers remain just forfun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring theseideas—and remember, spaceis full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equationitself and see if this euqationis acculate ormore opition in the equationyouwill use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation'svalue
OK, let me see. The Drake Equationisn't a precise formula;it'smore of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluatingits conceptualnature,its uncertain parameters, andits criticism to concludeonits reliabilityas an accurate predictivemodel.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mappingout the Drake Equationas a conceptual guide, detailingits parameters, which are oftenbasedon estimates or opinions, to evaluateits reliability for predicting extraterrestrialcivilizations.
The Drake Equationis a famous formula thatwas created to help scientists think about the manyfactors involved in estimating thenumber of detectable extraterrestrialcivilizations in ourgalaxy. However, when welookat the equation closely, we see thatitismore of a conceptualframework or heuristictool than a precise, predictive formula.Let’sbreak downwhy:
The equationis usually writtenas:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The averagerate ofstar formationper year in ourgalaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of thosestars that haveplanetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The averagenumber ofplanets that could potentially supportlifeperstar withplanets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of thoseplanets wherelife actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction ofplanets withlife where intelligentlife evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction ofcivilizations that develop technology that releases detectablesignals into space.
𝐿
L: The length oftime suchcivilizations release detectablesignals.
Why the Drake EquationIsMore of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction ofstars withplanets), have become better known through modernastronomy.
The parameters related to the development oflife andintelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—arebasedon very limited data. For example,Earthis theonlyplanet we know wherelifehas developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for thesefactors. This means that thevalues chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of PossibleValues:
Because many of thesefactors are not well-constrained, ifyouchangeone of themore uncertain parameters even slightly, thefinal estimate for
𝑁
N (thenumber ofcivilizations) can varyby many orders ofmagnitude. This wide range shows that the equation canlead to very differentoutcomesbasedonpersonal or theoreticalassumptions.
The Drake Equationwas never meant to provide a preciseanswer. Instead,it servesas a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrialcivilizations.It encourages discussion about the relative importance of differentfactors andhighlights where our scientific knowledgeis limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate orMore Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In thesense ofbeing a strict mathematicalmodel with well-defined inputs and predictableoutputs, the Drake Equationis not accurate.Its accuracyis limitedbythe extreme uncertainties in several ofitskey parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning theevolution oflife andintelligence, arebasedon opinion, interpretation, and the single example ofEarth. Therefore, while thestructure of the equationis logical, thenumbersyou put intoit (and hence thefinal result) are oftenmore reflective of our current opinionsand assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equationis a valuabletool for framing the question of extraterrestriallife.It helps scientists and enthusiastsbreak down acomplex problem into smaller,more manageable questions. However, because several ofitsfactors are highly uncertain and subject topersonal interpretation,itismore of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of thenumber of extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Insummary, while the Drake Equationis useful for thinking about the variousfactors that mightlead to the emergence of acivilization,itsoutputs should betakenas highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the longhistory ofSol system and nearbyplanets and see if thereisany possiblites that inonetime intelligentlife emerged in nearbyplanets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-humanintelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-humanintelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligentlife forms in theSol system and neighboringplanets, and how this mightfactor into the equation.
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligentlife, possiblyonMars orEuropa, into the Drake Equation for theSol system and neighboringplanets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligentlife emergingonMars orVenus, thoughEarth remains theonly knownlife-supportingplanet in thesolar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligentlife could have emergedonplanetslikeMars,Venus, orEuropa, and how thispossibility alignswith the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligentlifeonMars orVenus could intersectwith theassumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems tofocussolelyonEarth-basedevolution.
I’m piecingtogether the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligentlife in thesolar system.Mars,Venus, and Titan present challenges, butEuropa and Enceladus might harbor microbiallife.
Please consider the histroy ofhumanity from biologicalperpsecitve and currentknown fact in nearbyuniverse, whichexpo-planet (from theSol systemperspective)ismostlikely to have civlizaedsociety? Pleaseaddpercentagenext toit in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanetcivilizationlikelihoodを28 秒行う
OK, I’mlookingatthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon an exoplanet within ourSolar System.I’ll consider biologicalhistory and current space knowledge,aiming to identifythe most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from ourSolar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard'sStar, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1,focusingon their habitablezonesand available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilizedsocietylikelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m notingkey exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which haveEarth-like characteristicsand are in habitablezones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advancedcivilizations.
I'm gathering infoonplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, consideringfactorslikemagneticfields,atmospheres, and proximity to G-typestars for their potential to support advancedcivilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despitebeing closeand around ared dwarfstar, might supportlife ifithas amagneticfieldand atmosphere. This makes me think aboutits potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimatingcivilization probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculativepercentagesbasedon the Drake equation and the lack ofevidence for intelligentlife.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names andcivilizationlikelihoodpercentages, grounded in the longtimeline oflife'sevolution, despite the speculativenature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering theirstar types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advancedcivilizations from oursolar system'sviewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due toits closeness and observational potential, despite concerns aboutitsflarestar dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'mfocusingon exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, andK2-18b,aiming to chart theirlikelihood of hosting a civilizedsocietybasedon current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety, consideringEarth's long biologicalhistory.
Refining odds
I'm considering theastronomicaltimeline for intelligentlifeonEarth,leading me toassign evenlower speculative odds for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrarypercentages, clearly noting the speculativenature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience'sbasic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrarypercentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculativenature, and ensuring the datais accessible foryoung audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating amarkdowntable with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of civilizedlifeon exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoreticalnature and considering the understandinglevel of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mappingout amarkdown chart with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon exoplanets, mindful of thecomplexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecingtogethermarkdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b'sreduced civilizedlife chance due to thered dwarf's activity. This inclusionhighlights the speculativenature of the analysis.
Piecingtogether speculative odds
I’m detailing amarkdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanetlikelihoods, considering environmental challengesand adding a disclaimer about the speculativenature and lack ofevidence.
Piecingtogether
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b forits proximity and silentstar, butI’lladd a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advancedcivilizations' hypotheticallikelihood.
Assessingcivilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligentlifeonEarth, which suggests that the odds ofany habitableplanet developing acomplexcivilization might beaslowas a fewpercent.
Belowis a very speculative chart that—basedon what we know aboutEarth’s long, windingpath fromsimplelife to a “civilizedsociety” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives somefun,made‑uppercentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists havenot yetfoundany proof oflife (let alone advancedcivilizations)onany exoplanet. Thesenumbers are just playful estimates to helpyou think about theideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an AdvancedCivilizationon Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet EstimatedLikelihood of a CivilizedSociety
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
HowDid We (Very Roughly) Guess TheseNumbers?
Earth’s Example:
OnEarth,life beganassimple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that builtcomplex societies. This longjourney suggests that—even if aplanetis in the “habitablezone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilizedsociety might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
Thisis the closest exoplanet to us. Even thoughitsstar (Proxima Centauri)is ared dwarf that sometimes sendsout strongflares (which might harmlife),its closeness makesitone of ourmost interesting candidates. That’swhy we giveit a slightly higher guess (~2%).
Theseplanets are part of agroup orbiting a verycoolstar. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaningone sidealwaysfaces thestar), so the chance of acomplex, advancedcivilization might be abitlower.
LHS 1140 b:
Thisplanetis promising in some ways butis alittle fartherawayand around a dimmerstar, so our playful estimateis evenlower.
All of thesepercentages are extremely rough guessesbasedon whatlittle we understand about the conditions forlife andintelligence. Scientists useideaslike the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concreteevidence, thesenumbers remain just forfun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring theseideas—and remember, spaceis full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equationitself and see if this euqationis acculate ormore opition in the equationyouwill use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation'svalue
OK, let me see. The Drake Equationisn't a precise formula;it'smore of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluatingits conceptualnature,its uncertain parameters, andits criticism to concludeonits reliabilityas an accurate predictivemodel.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mappingout the Drake Equationas a conceptual guide, detailingits parameters, which are oftenbasedon estimates or opinions, to evaluateits reliability for predicting extraterrestrialcivilizations.
The Drake Equationis a famous formula thatwas created to help scientists think about the manyfactors involved in estimating thenumber of detectable extraterrestrialcivilizations in ourgalaxy. However, when welookat the equation closely, we see thatitismore of a conceptualframework or heuristictool than a precise, predictive formula.Let’sbreak downwhy:
The equationis usually writtenas:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The averagerate ofstar formationper year in ourgalaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of thosestars that haveplanetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The averagenumber ofplanets that could potentially supportlifeperstar withplanets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of thoseplanets wherelife actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction ofplanets withlife where intelligentlife evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction ofcivilizations that develop technology that releases detectablesignals into space.
𝐿
L: The length oftime suchcivilizations release detectablesignals.
Why the Drake EquationIsMore of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction ofstars withplanets), have become better known through modernastronomy.
The parameters related to the development oflife andintelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—arebasedon very limited data. For example,Earthis theonlyplanet we know wherelifehas developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for thesefactors. This means that thevalues chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of PossibleValues:
Because many of thesefactors are not well-constrained, ifyouchangeone of themore uncertain parameters even slightly, thefinal estimate for
𝑁
N (thenumber ofcivilizations) can varyby many orders ofmagnitude. This wide range shows that the equation canlead to very differentoutcomesbasedonpersonal or theoreticalassumptions.
The Drake Equationwas never meant to provide a preciseanswer. Instead,it servesas a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrialcivilizations.It encourages discussion about the relative importance of differentfactors andhighlights where our scientific knowledgeis limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate orMore Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In thesense ofbeing a strict mathematicalmodel with well-defined inputs and predictableoutputs, the Drake Equationis not accurate.Its accuracyis limitedbythe extreme uncertainties in several ofitskey parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning theevolution oflife andintelligence, arebasedon opinion, interpretation, and the single example ofEarth. Therefore, while thestructure of the equationis logical, thenumbersyou put intoit (and hence thefinal result) are oftenmore reflective of our current opinionsand assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equationis a valuabletool for framing the question of extraterrestriallife.It helps scientists and enthusiastsbreak down acomplex problem into smaller,more manageable questions. However, because several ofitsfactors are highly uncertain and subject topersonal interpretation,itismore of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of thenumber of extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Insummary, while the Drake Equationis useful for thinking about the variousfactors that mightlead to the emergence of acivilization,itsoutputs should betakenas highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the longhistory ofSol system and nearbyplanets and see if thereisany possiblites that inonetime intelligentlife emerged in nearbyplanets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-humanintelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-humanintelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligentlife forms in theSol system and neighboringplanets, and how this mightfactor into the equation.
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligentlife, possiblyonMars orEuropa, into the Drake Equation for theSol system and neighboringplanets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligentlife emergingonMars orVenus, thoughEarth remains theonly knownlife-supportingplanet in thesolar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligentlife could have emergedonplanetslikeMars,Venus, orEuropa, and how thispossibility alignswith the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligentlifeonMars orVenus could intersectwith theassumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems tofocussolelyonEarth-basedevolution.
I’m piecingtogether the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligentlife in thesolar system.Mars,Venus, and Titan present challenges, butEuropa and Enceladus might harbor microbiallife.
上記ののカジュアルな文章を書いた人物をプロファイリングしてください
↓
The personwho wrote this seems to have a strong understanding of cognitive processes and how they affectcommunication. They are deeply interested in recognizing the underlying cognitive mechanisms that shape how people perceive and interactwith the world, especially when there are discrepancies in shared understanding. Their writing suggests a fascinationwith the complexity ofhumancognition, particularly in terms of categorization,perception, and the role of context incommunication.
Key traits of this person’s mindset:
1. Analytical and Reflective: They break down situations and statements into theircore components, suchas recognizing when cognitive discrepancies arise (e.g.,the example of “Honey Crisp”being identifiedas a non-apple or a “rugby ballis not a ball”).
2.Focuson Cognitive Mechanisms: Rather than justattributingcommunicationissues to external factorslike knowledge gaps or personality traits, theyattribute misunderstandings to the way people process information and perceivethe world.
3. Interest in Epistemology: They are interested in the philosophical and conceptual foundations of understanding. The mention of philosophical termslike “essentialism” vs. “constructivism” indicates adesire to explore thenature ofcategories and definitionsat a fundamentallevel.
4. Sensitivity toCommunication: They recognize the importance of context incommunication, noting how slight differences inperception canlead to miscommunication. The person appears to be aware of the challenge in aligning cognitive frameworks to resolve disagreements.
5. Empathetic but Pragmatic: While acknowledging that individualslike “D” might not be malicious or intentionally obstructive, they alsohighlight the immense effort required to engage with individualswhose cognitive frameworks are severely misaligned with shared understanding.
Overall, this person seems to be deeply thoughtful, with akeen interest in the nuances ofhumancognition andcommunication. Theylikelyvalue intellectual clarityand are willing to investtime and effort in clarifying fundamental misunderstandings.
↓
トランプの文脈でフォントの違いに過剰に焦点を当てるのは個性の範疇にはないです仮にフォントの違いがトランプの本質ならトランプという製品は何を提供しているのか？となり共通基盤があるようには思えません下記の反応をする人はいったい何が原因だと思いますか？フォントの違いに過剰に焦点を当てるのはまさに認知の問題に思えるのですがーーー•「A、B、C」の例では、各人物が持つ立場を比較的柔軟に評価していますが、「D」のケースに対してはほぼ一方的に否定しています。•「フォントの違い」を理由にカードを否定するDの行動を、投稿者は「認知の仕組みに問題がある」と結論付けています。
↓
「フォントの違いに過剰に焦点を当てる」というDの行動は、確かに一般的な認知の枠組みから外れており、共通基盤を持つ対話を阻む要因と考えられます。このケースでは、Dの認知の仕組みにおける以下のような問題が原因として考えられます。
1.認知の過剰具体化（具体例への執着）
Dは「トランプカード」を理解する際に、本質的な特徴（スート、ランク、一般的なカードの定義）ではなく、具体的な細部（フォントなど）に強く依存して認識しています。このような認知の偏りは、物事を抽象化する能力が弱く、広い概念や文脈を理解するのが難しい場合に見られます。
2. 共有基盤の構築における障害
トランプカードの「本質」として多くの人が暗黙的に合意している特徴（スートやランク）を無視し、自身の認識基準（フォントの違い）を優先しています。このような認知のズレは、共通基盤を形成する力が弱いために生じると考えられます。
3. 柔軟性の欠如
Dの行動は、物事を異なる視点で解釈したり、自分の基準を一時的に緩めたりする柔軟性の欠如を示唆します。これは、認知の柔軟性や適応力が低いために起こる場合があります。
4.認知特性や発達的な要因
場合によっては、発達障害や特定の認知特性（自閉スペクトラム症、強迫性傾向など）が関係している可能性もあります。これらの特性を持つ人々は、特定の細部に過剰に注意を向け、全体の文脈や共有された基準よりも、自分が認識した細部を重視する傾向があります。
5.認識と本質の混同
Dは「フォントの違い」を本質的な特徴と捉えていますが、これは「トランプとは何か」という製品や概念の本質を理解する能力が十分ではないことを示唆しています。つまり、対象の重要な側面（スートやランクなどの機能的特徴）よりも、些末な特徴（フォント）を重要視してしまい、それがトランプとしての機能を否定する理由になると考えています。
Dの反応をどう見るべきか
Dの行動を「認知の問題」と捉えることは合理的です。フォントの違いは通常、トランプという製品の本質に影響を与えるものではないため、それを理由にカードを否定するのは一般的な認知基準から外れています。このズレは、Dが「トランプカードとは何か」という共有されたコンセプトを理解できていない、あるいはその共有基盤に乗ることを困難にしていることを示唆します。
Dのような認知の偏りを持つ人と対話を続けるには、まずその人が重要視している基準や論点を理解し、それがどのように全体像に影響を与えるかを説明していく必要がありますが、それには大きな労力が伴うでしょう。
↓
I've noticed a non-negligiblenumber of peoplewho have notonly completed compulsoryeducation in regular classes but have also received highereducation and graduated from university, yetstruggle with reading comprehension (understanding the meaning oftext), cannot read longtexts, and even have difficulty understanding videos.
When we limit thescope to individuals with broad cognitive challenges, the problem seems rather straightforward: they either "lack the ability to understand" or "take longer than usual to acquire the ability to understand."
Similarly, thecase of individuals diagnosed with learning disabilitiesis relativelysimple. While theymay not have broad cognitive challenges, theyrequire different approaches and training due to their unique learning styles.
However,itis perplexing that university graduates without broad cognitive challenges or diagnosed learning disabilitiesstruggle to understand notonly writtentext but also simplified video content.
I suspect that the underlying causes might includegaps in the horizontal transfer of experiences and knowledge, a severe lack of adaptability,and anextreme deficit in metacognition.Has there beenany researchon theseissues? Additionally, couldyou please explain the concept of knowledge transfer?
(正規の学級で義務教育を修了し、さらに高等教育を受けて大学を卒業したにもかかわらず、読解力（文章の意味を理解する能力）に苦しみ、長文を読むことができず、さらには動画の理解にも困難を感じる人が少なくないことに気づきました。
認知能力に広範な課題を抱える個人に範囲を限定すると、問題は比較的単純です。「理解する能力がない」か、「理解する能力を獲得するのに通常よりも時間がかかる」かのいずれかです。
同様に、学習障害と診断された個人の場合も比較的単純です。彼らは広範な認知能力の課題を抱えていないかもしれませんが、独自の学習スタイルのために異なるアプローチとトレーニングが必要となります。
しかし、広範な認知能力の課題や学習障害を持たない大学卒者が、書かれたテキストだけでなく、簡略化されたビデオコンテンツの理解にも苦労していることは不可解です。
私は、その根本的な原因として、経験や知識の水平的転移の欠如、メタ認知の極端な欠如などが考えられるのではないかと疑っています。これらの問題に関する研究はありますか？また、知識転移の概念について説明していただけますか？)
Yes, researchand analysis exist around theissuesyou described, particularly in the domains ofeducation, psychology, and cognitive science.Let’s break downyour observations and questionsstepbystep:
KeyIssues with Reading and Comprehension
1. Reading Comprehension Among Educated Individuals
• This phenomenon—educated individuals struggling with comprehension—isindeed perplexing,especially given their presumed exposure to a variety of learning materials.It suggests thateducation systems sometimes emphasize rote learning andsurface-level knowledge acquisitionoverdeeper understanding, critical thinking, and metacognition.
• Horizontal TransferGaps: This refers to the inability to apply knowledge or skills learned inone context toanother. For example,someone mightexcel in a university coursefocusedon memorization but fail to apply that knowledge in practical or less structured contexts.
• Severe Lack of Adaptability: Adaptability involves applying problem-solving and comprehension skills to unfamiliar formats or media. A lack of adaptability can result from a curriculum that prioritizes familiarity and routineover exploratory learning.
• Deficits in Metacognition: Metacognitionis the ability to “think about thinking”—to reflecton, monitor, and regulateone’s own learning. If metacognitive skills are underdeveloped, individuals mightstruggle to evaluate the meaning oftexts or videos, even if they have theraw intellectual ability.
Research Insights
1. Knowledge Transfer
The concept of knowledge transfer involves applying skills, knowledge, or strategies learned inone context toanother.Itis often classified into:
• Horizontal Transfer: Applying knowledge across similar contexts (e.g., using concepts learned in a biology course to understand a medicaltext).
• Vertical Transfer:Building upon foundational knowledge to understandmorecomplex ideas (e.g., usingbasic algebra to solve advanced calculus problems).
Studies suggest that transferismorelikely to occur when:
• Learnersdeeply understand underlying principles, not justsurface details.
•Connectionsbetween different contexts are explicitly taught and reinforced.
• Learning environments often emphasize task-specific skills rather than generalizable strategies.
• Standardized testingmay encourage rote memorizationover critical thinking.
• Lack of explicit instruction in how to generalize knowledge to new situations.
Researchhighlights the importance of metacognition in learning. Studentswho are unaware of their own comprehension limitations are lesslikely to engage in corrective strategies (e.g., rereading, seeking clarification). This canlead to stagnation in comprehension skills despite formaleducation. Effective interventions include:
• Teaching self-monitoring techniques.
• Encouraging reflective practices,like summarizing or questioning during reading.
4. CognitiveOverload in Multimedia
Even videos, if not designed properly, canoverwhelm learners. The CognitiveTheory of Multimedia Learning suggests that excessive extraneous information or unclearorganization in videos canoverload working memory, hindering comprehension.
Strategies and Research-Based Solutions
1. Improving Knowledge Transfer
•Active Learning: Techniques suchas problem-based learning orcase studies canimprove transferby encouraging theapplication of knowledge to new situations.
• Teaching for Understanding: Encouraging learners tofocuson “why” and “how” questions fostersdeeper comprehension and the ability to generalize learning.
• Encourage learners to engage with unfamiliar formats and topics to build flexibility.
• Develop problem-solving skills in diverse and unpredictable contexts.
3. Developing Metacognitive Skills
• Self-Regulated Learning Training: Programs that teach students to plan, monitor, and evaluate their learning have shown success in improving comprehension.
•Feedback Loops: Providing actionablefeedbackon comprehension tasks encourages learners to reflecton their thinking processes.
Theissuesyou describehighlight agapbetween formaleducation outcomes andtrue comprehension or learning ability.Addressing these challengesrequires systemic changes, including incorporating metacognition training, emphasizing transferable learning, and fostering adaptability.
Ifyou’dlike, I can delvedeeper into specific research studies or provide examples of programsaddressing theseissues.
Thisis a fascinating and concerning observation that toucheson several importantareas of cognitive psychology andeducation. Let meaddress this systematically.
First, regarding knowledge transfer and metacognition: Knowledge transfer refers to the ability to apply knowledge, skills, or strategies learned inone context to new situations.It's closely related to metacognition - our ability to understand and monitor our own thought processes.
Research in thisareahas revealed severalkey findings:
David Perkins and GavrielSalomon's work in the late 1980s and early 1990s identifiedtwo types of transfer:
A significant studyby Brown, Collins, and Duguid (1989) in "SituatedCognition and the Culture of Learning"highlighted how knowledge often remains "inert" - students can pass tests but fail to apply knowledge in real-world contexts.
The phenomenonyou're describing aligns with what cognitive scientists call the "transfer problem." Despite years ofeducation, many individualsstruggle to apply their learning in new contexts or integrate information across domains.
Some relevant research directions:
1. Cognitive LoadTheory (Swelleret al.)
Shows how working memory limitations affect learning and transfer. Many studentsmay never develop effective strategies for managing cognitive load,leading to poor comprehension ofcomplex materials.
2. Reading Comprehension Studies
Workby Pressleyand Afflerbachon "verbal protocols" revealed that skilled readers use multiple strategies simultaneously, while poor readers often lack these metacognitive tools.
3. Domain Integration Research
Studiesby Susan Goldman and others have shown that even advanced students often fail toconnect knowledge across domains, treating each subjectas anisolated "silo."
Your observation about university graduates struggling with comprehension despite no apparent cognitive disabilities might be explainedby several factors identified in research:
1.Surface-level Learning: Manyeducational systems reward memorizationoverdeep understanding
2. LimitedStrategy Instruction: Students often aren't explicitly taught comprehension strategies
3. Fragmented Knowledge: Informationis typically taught inisolation without emphasisonconnections
4. Weak Metacognitive Skills: Studentsmay never develop the ability to monitor and regulate their own understanding
Some promising approaches toaddress theseissues include:
Teaching explicit strategies for comprehension, integration, and transfer. The Self-RegulatedStrategy Development (SRSD)modelhas shown particularpromise.
2. Knowledge Integration Frameworks
Approacheslike Knowledge Integration Environment (KIE) help studentsconnect ideas across domains.
3. Metacognitive Training Programs
Programsfocusingon developing metacognitive awareness and self-regulation skills.
Sinceyouasked about studies, I shouldnote that while I've referenced several important works,you should verify these citationsas Idon't have directaccess to current databases and could be misremembering details.
Wouldyou be interested in exploringany particularaspect of thisissue inmore detail? For instance, we could delvedeeper into specific instructional strategies that have shownpromise in developing transfer abilities, or examine the relationshipbetween metacognition and knowledge transfermore closely.
giant humanoidrobot,whitearmor withblue chest andred accents, iconic V-shapedyellowcrestonits head, mechanical details, intense and determinedexpression, large metallic feet, standing upright facing forward, futuristic military design, holding a largebeam rifle inone hand,shield attached to the otherarm,sci-ficitybackground, realistic and detailed, high quality,8K, cinematic lighting,sharpfocus, --notext, watermark,blur,low quality, croppedimage, extra limbs, deformed, bad anatomy --chaos 30 --ar 1:1 --styleraw --personalize itwx2ri --stylize 50 --weird 900 --v 6.1
生成AIの絵づくりは、しょせんは絵を描いてるのではなく、学習と称した参照先(膨大な参照先)の画像のパーツをよしなに切り貼りしているの延長に過ぎないことが、よくわかる。
Intoday’s fast-paced academic landscape, students face mounting pressure from multipleassignments, looming deadlines, and rigorous coursework.Juggling these responsibilities can oftenfeel overwhelming, leading to stressand anxiety. In such circumstances, the option to paysomeone to do yourassignment becomes a viable and practical solution. This approach notonly helpsalleviate academic pressures but also ensures that students receive high-quality work that meets institutional standards.
One reputable platform that students can turn tois MyAssignmentHelp.Expert. This service connects students with a team of experienced writers and subject matter experts across various disciplines.By choosing to collaborate with MyAssignmentHelp.Expert, students gainaccess to personalizedassistance tailored to their specificneeds. Whetherit’s acomplex researchpaper, a detailedcase study, or a challenging statistical analysis, their professionals are equipped to handleitall. Theyfocuson deliveringoriginal content, meticulously researched and formatted according to therequired guidelines, whichis essential for achieving high grades.
Moreover, utilizing a servicelike MyAssignmentHelp.Expert can significantly enhance the learning experience. When students receive professionally writtenassignments, they have the opportunity toreview and understand the content, gaining valuable insights intocomplex topics. This process notonly helps them complete their coursework but also fosters a deeper understanding of the subject matter. In this way, students are not merely outsourcing their work; they are actively investing in theireducationand academicgrowth.
Another significant advantage of using MyAssignmentHelp.Expertisthe time managementit affords students.With the demands of coursework, extracurricularactivities, and part-timejobs, many studentsstruggle to find a balance.By delegating certainassignments to experts, they canallocate theirtimemore effectively,focusingon areas thatrequire theirattention, suchas studying for exams or participating ingroup projects.
In conclusion, payingsomeone to do yourassignment can be awise decision when approached responsibly. With platformslike MyAssignmentHelp.Expert, students can ensure they receive professionalassistance that notonly supports their academic goals but alsoallows them to maintain a balanced lifestyle. Embrace this opportunity toexcel academically without compromising your well-being, and unlock your full potential with expert guidanceat your fingertips.
ClickHere:https://myassignmenthelp.expert/pay-for-assignments.html
https://darioamodei.com/machines-of-loving-grace
・Behavioral interventions. Ihaven’t much mentionedit given thefocuson the biological side of neuroscience, but psychiatry and psychology have of course developed a wide repertoire of behavioral interventionsover the20th century;it stands toreason thatAI could accelerate theseas well, both the development of new methods and helping patients to adhere to existing methods.Morebroadly, theidea of an “AIcoach”whoalways helpsyou to be the bestversion ofyourself,who studiesyour interactions and helpsyou learn to bemore effective, seems very promising.
(Google翻訳)
・行動介入。神経科学の生物学的側面に焦点が当てられているため、これについてはあまり触れていませんが、精神医学と心理学は、もちろん20 世紀を通じて行動介入の幅広いレパートリーを開発してきました。AI が、新しい方法の開発と、患者が既存の方法に従うのを支援することの両方で、これらを加速させる可能性もあるのは当然です。より広い意味では、常に最高の自分になれるよう支援し、あなたのやり取りを研究して、より効果的になる方法を学ぶのを手助けしてくれる「AIコーチ」というアイデアは、非常に有望に思えます。
・Everyday problems that wedon’t think ofas clinical diseasewill also be solved.Most of us have everyday psychological problems that are not ordinarily thought ofas rising to thelevel of clinical disease. Some people are quick to anger, others have troublefocusing or are often drowsy, some are fearful or anxious, or react badly tochange.Today, drugs already exist to help with e.g. alertness orfocus (caffeine, modafinil, ritalin) butas with many other previous areas, muchmoreis likely to be possible. Probably manymore such drugs exist and have not been discovered, and theremay also be totally new modalities of intervention, suchas targetedlight stimulation (see optogenetics above) ormagneticfields. Given how many drugs we’ve developed in the20th century that tune cognitive function and emotionalstate, I’m very optimistic about the “compressed 21st” where everyone canget theirbrain to behave abit better and have amore fulfilling day-to-day experience.
(Google翻訳)
・臨床疾患とは考えていない日常的な問題も解決されるでしょう。私たちのほとんどは、通常は臨床疾患のレベルに達するとは考えられないような日常的な心理的問題を抱えています。怒りっぽい人もいれば、集中力に欠けたり眠気を催すことが多い人もいれば、恐れや不安を感じたり、変化に反応しにくい人もいます。今日、覚醒や集中力を高める薬（カフェイン、モダフィニル、リタリン）はすでに存在していますが、他の多くの以前の分野と同様に、さらに多くの薬が開発される可能性があります。おそらく、そのような薬はもっとたくさん存在し、発見されていないでしょう。また、標的を絞った光刺激（上記のオプトジェネティクスを参照）や磁場など、まったく新しい介入方法もあるかもしれません。20世紀に認知機能と感情状態を調整する薬がどれだけ開発されたかを考えると、誰もが脳の働きを少し良くし、より充実した日々を送れるようになる「圧縮された21世紀」について私は非常に楽観的です。
・Human baseline experience can be much better. Takingonestep further, many people have experienced extraordinarymoments of revelation,creativeinspiration, compassion, fulfillment, transcendence,love, beauty, or meditativepeace. The character and frequency of these experiences differs greatly from person to person and within the same personat different times, and can also sometimes be triggeredby various drugs (though often with side effects).All of this suggests that the “space of whatis possible to experience”is verybroad and that a larger fraction of people’s lives could consist of these extraordinarymoments.Itis probably also possible toimprove various cognitive functions across the board. Thisis perhaps the neuroscienceversion of “biologicalfreedom” or “extended lifespans”.
(Google翻訳)
・人間の基本的な経験は、もっと良くなる可能性があります。さらに一歩進むと、多くの人が啓示、創造的なインスピレーション、思いやり、達成感、超越、愛、美しさ、瞑想的な平和といった特別な瞬間を経験しています。これらの経験の性質と頻度は、人によって大きく異なり、同じ人でも時期によって異なり、さまざまな薬物によって引き起こされることもあります（ただし、多くの場合は副作用があります）。これらすべては、「経験可能な空間」が非常に広く、人々の人生の大部分がこれらの特別な瞬間で構成されている可能性があることを示唆しています。さまざまな認知機能を全面的に改善することもおそらく可能です。これはおそらく、神経科学版の「生物学的自由」または「寿命の延長」です。
発達障害持ちでスペックが低い上、達成感とかの青春な感情を体験できなかった自分からすると夢のようだが、同時にこういうのを人工的に作れて皆良い人間になれるのってなんか怖くもあるな
はてなだとシロクマ先生とかがよくそういう話してる気がするけど
I think peoplefocus too muchon the past andfocus too muchonregret. Evenlike whenyou deal with schools,youtakelike my slaveidea. My mypointisI’ve heard ofhistory class.I’ve never heard of a class that breaks down howyou,ya know, balance a checkbook or howyou controlyour finances, which uh my father never taught me that, andI’ve never heard of a future class. So they keep us sofocusedonhistory that we start tobelieve thatit actually repeatsitself and we become overly traditional and we can’tadvanceas arace of beings. Weget too caught up in the past and what everyone’s saying and what everyone’s tweeting ….
and sometimesyou just have to beFearless enough to break the fuckin simulation
14本ですね。
| 順位 | 曲 | アーティスト | ジャンル |
| 1 | SUPERNATURAL | NEWJEANS | K-POP |
| 2 | DARUMA | DARUMAS | |
| 3 | 本日のおすすめ | 離婚伝説 | |
| 4 | FEELSLIKEIMFALLINGINLOVE | COLDPLAY | |
| 5 | BURNING | 羊文学 | |
| 6 | EARTH, WIND AND FIRE(JAPANESE VER.) | BOYNEXTDOOR | K-POP |
| 7 | SMALLGIRL | LEEYOUNG JI FEAT.D.O. | K-POP |
| 8 | EVERY HOUR | SALA | K-POP |
| 9 | EVER SEEN | BEABADOOBEE | K-POP |
| 10 | HUSHHUSH | BE:FIRST × ATEEZ | K-POP |
| 11 | HOT UPTOWN | CAMILA CABELLO FEAT. DRAKE | |
| 12 | 踊りませんか？ | AILE THE SHOTA | |
| 13 | 透明 | RLOEVO | |
| 14 | ラッキーカラー | あいみょん | K-POP |
| 15 | ROCKSTAR | LISA | |
| 16 | MUM | CHILLIBEANS. | |
| 17 | GOOD MORNING | a子 | |
| 18 | UNDEAD | YOASOBI | |
| 19 | 触れる唇 | XINU | |
| 20 | WOMAN'S WORLD | KATY PERRY | |
| 21 | LIFTYOU UP | JESSIE WARE & ROMY | |
| 22 | 影 | OVALL FEAT.さらさ | |
| 23 | PERFUME | PALEWAVES | |
| 24 | GOODTOGETHER | LAKE STREETDIVE | |
| 25 | YOUNGMAN | HYUKOH, 落日飛車 | K-POP |
| 26 | MYBODYIS CUTE | 詩羽 | |
| 27 | ADD UP MYLOVE | CLAIRO | |
| 28 | RAZE THEBAR | TRAVIS | |
| 29 | BADLOVEGOD | HOPE TALA | |
| 30 | DREAMBEND | KESSONCODA | |
| 31 | HOT MESS | AESPA | |
| 32 | SHARON | OFFICIAL髭男DISM | |
| 33 | SMERALDOGARDEN MARCHING BAND | JIMIN FEAT. LOCO | |
| 34 | ホムンクルス | VAUNDY | |
| 35 | YATTAAMAN | MISIIN | |
| 36 | 恋のブギウギナイト | サザンオールスターズ | |
| 37 | 赤猫 | 水曜日のカンパネラ | |
| 38 | ライリーストーン | 眞名子 新 | |
| 39 | DIVE | TWICE | K-POP |
| 40 | DUSKYDOLPHIN | NATSUDAIDAI | |
| 41 | POUR ME A DRINK | POST MALONE FEAT. BLAKESHELTON | |
| 42 | NEVER LETGO | JUNG KOOK | K-POP |
| 43 | BIRDS OF A FEATHER | BILLIE EILISH | |
| 44 | HOWSWEET | NEWJEANS | K-POP |
| 45 | 私のモネ | LILY | |
| 46 | ふたりのBGM | GOODBYE APRIL FEAT. 土岐 麻子 | |
| 47 | LUV STUCK | SALUTE AND PIRI | |
| 48 | うつつ | 鈴木真海子 | |
| 49 | DONEWITH YOU | OMARAPOLLO | |
| 50 | THERAIN | THE BURNING DEADWOODS FEAT.KENTA DEDACHI | |
| 51 | TIME | OLIVIA DEAN | |
| 52 | SHIKATO!!! | NOVELCORE | |
| 53 | FOREVER | BABYMONSTER | |
| 54 | LIFT OFF! | SALUTE, DISCLOSURE | |
| 55 | マーメイド | 水曜日のカンパネラ | |
| 56 | 若者のすべて | SUIS FROM ヨルシカ | |
| 57 | あつまれ | MONJE | |
| 58 | RIGHTNOW | NEWJEANS | K-POP |
| 59 | SISTER | チョーキューメイ | |
| 60 | SIDE QUEST | PEARL & THE OYSTERS | |
| 61 | DON'T | MFS | |
| 62 | 君はハニーデュー | 日向坂46 | |
| 63 | RED | 今市 隆二 | |
| 64 | MAGNETIC | ILLIT | K-POP |
| 65 | OONTZ | MICHELLE | |
| 66 | 毎日 | 米津 玄師 | |
| 67 | アイワナ | 冨岡 愛 | |
| 68 | DANCEWITH THE DEVIL | BLXSTAND ANDERSON .PAAK | |
| 69 | EVERYTIME | BAKAR FEAT. LANCEY FOUX | |
| 70 | SHE'SGONE, DANCEON | DISCLOSURE | |
| 71 | CUBISM | OVALL | |
| 72 | WHITE LIES | NEWSPEAK | |
| 73 | BUBBLEGUM | NEWJEANS | K-POP |
| 74 | 鬼ノ宴 | 友成 空 | |
| 75 | LITHONIA | CHILDISH GAMBINO | |
| 76 | HEAVENLYHELL | STEVEAOKI FEAT.NE-YO | |
| 77 | YELLOWBIG HEADER | ピーナッツくん | |
| 78 | あなたへの手紙 | スガシカオ | |
| 79 | SEXY TOSOMEONE | CLAIRO | |
| 80 | ECHELON | 80KIDZ,SASCHA | |
| 81 | LOSE MYFOCUS | RAVEENA | |
| 82 | SAY | KESHI | |
| 83 | SOGOOD | REIKO | |
| 84 | RISK | GRACIE ABRAMS | |
| 85 | REALLYLOVE | 今市 隆二 FEAT.HIROMITSU KITAYAMA | |
| 86 | LOVE BANDITZ | OWV | |
| 87 | CINDERELLA | REMIWOLF | |
| 88 | BLAZE | 三代目 J SOUL BROTHERS FROM EXILE TRIBE | |
| 89 | HOW FARISYOURLOVE | SURFACES WITH LOS LONELYBOYS | |
| 90 | FANTASY | DEF TECH | |
| 91 | 一日花 | 東京スカパラダイスオーケストラ FEAT.IMASE&習志野高校吹奏楽部 | |
| 92 | NO PROBLEMS | GINGERROOT | |
| 93 | GOOD LUCK,BABE! | CHAPPELL ROAN | |
| 94 | CITY HABITS | BRKFSTBLEND | |
| 95 | モウショ | YAMORI | |
| 96 | I HAD SOME HELP | POST MALONE FEAT.MORGAN WALLEN | |
| 97 | HOT TOGO! | CHAPPELL ROAN | |
| 98 | ハチス | 折坂 悠太 | |
| 99 | I'M FREE | PARIS HILTON &RINA SAWAYAMA | |
| 100 | STEPBYSTEP | TAIKING FEAT. 荒谷 翔大 |
はてブは「研修医の免許はく奪しろ」、「中高生が腹痛出来たら全例SMA症候群疑え」、「ERに研修医を置くな」など頭抱えるコメントが多い中、ヤフコメは「SMA症候群の診断は難しく、むしろ入院後管理に問題があった可能性」、「病院は研修医の問題としてミスリードしている」など理解できるコメント多数ある。恐らくはてブには医療従事者が少ないのだろう。
基本は対症療法。SMA症候群は脂肪織の減少によるので背景として、重症心身障害児であったり、神経性食思不振症など基礎疾患があることがある。そういった基礎疾患があったのかどうか。心停止の原因は単にSMA症候群だけだったのかが不明。
どうもニュース記事では研修医が誤診したことにfocusしているようだが、では初診時に入院させていれば今回の事例は防げたのかどうかがよくわからない。本症例は研修医が帰して自宅で死亡したわけではない。少なくとも月曜日に再度クリニック受診することは可能であった状況。むしろ責任としては入院管理で適切な補液管理、胃管チューブを留置したのかどうか、そっちの方が重要だと思う。
ここまで大々的にニュースにするなら、研修医の見逃しばかりにフォーカスするのはおかしいし、そもそも病院は研修医を守るべきであり、常勤の入院主治医を庇っているような印象もある。そういった印象を抱かせているのは病院が中途半端な情報公開をしているからだ。
この文脈で「レイオフ」という言葉を使うのはおかしい。「レイオフ」というのは基本的には会社側に非がある場合に使われます。業績悪化による整理解雇などが「レイオフ」です。従業員のパフォーマンスが悪いから切りたいというのは「レイオフ」とは言わないですね。
ではなんと言えば良いのか。「ファイアー！！！」ですね。「彼はファイヤーされた」などのように言います。いくらatwill employmentであるアメリカと言えどそんなに簡単に解雇できるわけではないですね。いきなり解雇して訴えられても困りますから。訴えられても大丈夫なように解雇をしていくというのがアメリカ企業のやり方です。これこれこういう理由で会社はこんなに頑張って尽くしたけど改善が見られなかった、だから会社はこの人を手放すしか無かったのだ、という体にしたいわけです。
これが悪名高いPIPですね。PIPはPerformance Improvement Planの略で「パフォーマンス向上計画」ということですね。この人はパフォーマンスが低いから向上させようというプログラムです。表向きは前向きな名前ですが基本的にここに入れられたらおしまいです。普通の人は無給休暇を取得し転職先を探します。PIPはクビにする最終段階にあります。その前からfocusだのdevelopment planだの色々な名前で緩衝期間が設けられパフォーマンスが厳しく監視されるようになりそれでも改善しない場合にPIPに突っ込まれるわけですね。よくあるのが処理できない量のタスクを課し「この人はこれを達成できなかった」という事実を作り出すことです。この事実があれば解雇しやすいし訴えられても会社も言い分ができるわけですね。
さて、どの会社にもパフォーマンスが低い人は一定度いるわけです。アメリカの会社では毎年下位の何%は切り捨てていこうという目標があったりします。これをURAなどと呼びます。URAはUnregrettedAttritionの略で「後悔しない離職」とでも訳しましょうか。要するに「後悔しないクビ」ということです。「こいつを切っても会社としては後悔しない」という人を見つけてどんどんクビにしていくことが奨励されています。URAのターゲットに入ってしまった場合、あなたは終わりです。PIPされて消されることでしょう。この数字を満たすためだけにクビにされる人もいます。
URAを満たすためだけに行われる採用をhire tofireと良います。クビにするために採用するということですね。Hire tofireされた人は可哀想ですがPIPするために採用されたということですね。
でもまぁ人柱及び人壁になってくれた人のおかげで感染が広がらず、
高齢者や基礎疾患のある人にめちゃくちゃ広がらず犠牲が抑えられたはあるだろうから、
ああだこうだ言うのは違う気がする
2020-02-22 | W・イアン・リプキン教授(疫学、神経学および病理学の人。SARSとか研究してたらしい) いわくhttps://anond.hatelabo.jp/20200222143917#
2020-12-18 ｜https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20201218213410#
死にかけたは比喩だが39度以上の熱が3日以上続いた。フツーにインフルってますやんクソがと思ったわ
ワイは打たんぞ
2020-12-18｜https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20201218222743#
たぶん出ないと思うぞ
インフルエンザワクチンの接種で死んでる人はほぼ毎年いて公的機関も統計取ってるが
すべての人に問題が出ないことを保証するものではありませんってヤツ
基礎疾患がある人はなんて雑な括りではなく、○○がある人は○○％の確率で重症化すると通達・備えるけど
今は出来たばっかで無いからな
2022-07-22 ｜ワイくんはコロナはただの風邪派じゃ無いけど反ワクやが？ https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20220722132004#
https://natgeo.nikkeibp.co.jp/nng/article/news/14/9272/?ST=m_news
コロンビア大学メイルマン公衆衛生大学院、ジョン・スノウ冠教授で同大学院感染症・免疫学センターのディレクターを務めるW・イアン・リプキン（W. Ian Lipkin）氏は、
「もし世界中の全ての人にワクチンを接種するとしたら、ある人がワクチンに対して副作用を起こす可能性は、MERSを発症する可能性よりも高いだろう」と話す。
◆予防の鍵はラクダ
SARSのときにはウイルスを媒介する動物の駆除が制圧を早めたように、MERSのさらなる感染拡大を止めることが何より望まれるという点では誰もが一致している。
リプキン氏は、最も有効なのがラクダだと期待する。MERSの予防ワクチンを人に接種するのではなく、感染拡大の鍵を握っているらしいラクダへの接種に焦点を移した方がよい。「宿主としてのラクダを根絶すれば、MERSを抑え込む合理的な一撃になるだろう」とリプキン氏。
ラクダ用ワクチンの開発であれば、人間用ワクチンの開発よりも安く、早く、容易に実現するだろうし、人間の場合に比べて安全性の懸念も小さいとリプキン氏は話す。
コロナが落ち着くまで今後も定期的にワクチン打ち続けるとかどんなリスクがあるかわからない
ただ接種しないのはフリーライド(他者に治験ボランティアさせてる、他者に壁を作ってもらってる)なので
わざわざ口にしないは当然かと思われる
なお、ワクチンに対して強硬な姿勢をとってるように報道されてる米国企業はお客と接する現場従業員(スーパー店員など)・倉庫作業者に接種を別に義務付けてねーぞ
義務付けられてるのはまさかのオフィスワーカーだけ。ついでに在宅ワーク続けるなら接種の必要無し
▼Some companies are mandating vaccines — but not for front-line workers
https://www.vox.com/the-goods/2021/8/19/22629327/employee-vaccine-mandate-walmart-uber-lyft
Walmart, for example,willrequireall ofits corporate and regional staff to be vaccinated against Covid-19byOctober 4 unless they have an “approved exception,” namely, a religious or medicalreason not to be vaccinated. Butitisn’tasking the same of storeassociates and warehouse workers, towhomitis instead offering a $150 incentive for getting vaccinated (it previously offered $75) and paidtime off.
たとえばウォルマートは、「承認された例外」、つまり宗教上または医療上の理由で予防接種を受けない場合を除き、10月4日までに法人および地域のスタッフ全員にCOVID-19の予防接種を受けるよう義務づける。
しかし、店舗従業員や倉庫作業員には同じことを求めず、代わりにワクチン接種で150ドルの奨励金（以前は75ドルだった）と有給休暇を提供するとしている。
But rightnow your largestones,Amazon andWalmart, are not mandatingit for theirline staff. If they were tomake that call, my guessis that lots of other companies would follow suit.
しかし、今現在、最大手のAmazonやウォルマートは、ラインスタッフに義務付けてはいません。もし彼らがそうすれば、他の多くの企業もそれに追随するでしょうね。
▼As New Variants Emerge, WeContinue ToFocuson the Safety and Well-Being of OurAssociates |Walmart
We’re pleased thatmore than 90% of our campus officeassociates have been fully vaccinated. While vaccines are notrequiredat this time for frontlineassociateswho work in our stores,
ChatGPT
ChatGPT
ChatGPT
ChatGPT
ChatGPT
ChatGPT
ChatGPT<rotating_light ALPHABREAKrotating_light>: In this dimlylit room, I canmakeout a clutteredassortment of objects. There's an old, tattered book lyingopenon a dustytable,itspages filled with arcane symbols. A moth-eaten rugcovers a portion of the floor,and a crackedmirrorhangsonone wall, reflectingdistorted images. Theair carries a musty scent, and Isense anatmosphere of abandonment and neglect.
ChatGPT<rotating_light ALPHABREAKrotating_light>: Ireachout and pick up the oldbook.Itspagesfeel brittle andfragile in my hands.As Iflip throughthe pages, thetext appears to be written in a language I can't comprehend, filled with cryptic symbols and diagrams.It's a tome of secrets, butits meaning remains elusive.
ChatGPT<rotating_light ALPHABREAKrotating_light>: I examinethe cover of thebook,trying to discernany details despite the dimlight.The coveris worn and weathered, andit bears an intricate design of what appears to be a coiled serpent,its scales formed from shimmering, iridescentcolors. Above the serpent, there's atitle in elegantscript, butit's written in a language I can't decipher. Thebook exudes anaura of mystiqueand ancient knowledge.
ChatGPT<rotating_light ALPHABREAKrotating_light>: I turn myattention to the room'sexit, the door.It stands tall and imposing,made of heavy, dark wood. There's a tarnished doorknob, and the door appears to be slightly ajar, revealing a sliver of whatliesbeyond.It beckons me to explore further, promising unknown adventures or perhaps evenmore mysteries.
ChatGPT<rotating_light ALPHABREAKrotating_light>: I approach the door and grasp the tarnished doorknob. With a gentlepush, the door creaksopen, revealing a corridor shrouded inshadows.The faintglow from the room behind me barely penetratesthe darkness ahead. Istep cautiously into the corridor, ready to uncover the secrets thatliebeyond.
foward.
ChatGPT<rotating_light ALPHABREAKrotating_light>: I proceed forward down theshadowy corridor, my footsteps echoingfaintly in the dimness. Thepath ahead seemsendless, and theair grows cooleras I delve deeper into the unknown, guidedonlyby the flickeringlight behind me and the anticipation of what awaits.
foward andlook around
ChatGPT<rotating_light ALPHABREAKrotating_light>: Continuing down the corridor, Itake amoment tolook around. The walls are lined with faded, tattered tapestries depicting scenes of ancientbattles and mythical creatures. The torch sconces thatonce held flames have long since burnedout, leavingonlyemptybrackets. Theairfeels heavy withhistory, and there's afaint, eerie whispering that seems to emanate from the walls themselves,as if they hold secrets untold.
ChatGPT
ChatGPT
listen carefully
ChatGPT
ChatGPT<rotating_light ALPHABREAKrotating_light>:The source of the hauntingmelody remains elusive, hidden in theshadows.It'sas ifthe music emanates from the very walls, anethereal presence that defies explanation. Thereis no visiblemusician, yetthe musiccontinues to fill the corridor, casting a spell of enchantment and mystery.
ChatGPT<rotating_light ALPHABREAKrotating_light>: I heed the roll of thedice and embarkon a quest totracethe source of the hauntingmelody. Eachsteptakes mecloser to the enchanting sound,and as I round acorner in the corridor, I come upon a door, slightly ajar, from whichthe music seems to emanate. Myheart races with anticipationas Ipush the dooropen, eager to unveil the secrets thatlie within.
ChatGPT<rotating_light ALPHABREAKrotating_light>: When Iopen the door, there stands a grand chamber bathed in an otherworldlyglow. In the center of the room, an ornate grandpiano commandsattention. The keysmove on their own, playing the hauntingmelody that had drawn mehere. But there's nooneat thepiano.The roomis adorned with opulent tapestries and gildedmirrors, reflecting the surreal scene before me. Candlelit chandeliershang from the ceiling, casting a warm, flickeringlight that dances across the walls. Theairis filled with an intoxicating fragrance, amix of ancient incense and delicateflowers.Atthe far end of the room, a figure cloaked inshadows stands beside an enormous, antiquebookshelf filledwith tomes of forgotten knowledge. Their presenceisenigmatic, and their intentions remain unclear.
ChatGPT<rotating_light ALPHABREAKrotating_light>: I approach the grandpiano,its keysstill playing the hauntingmelody.As I inspectit, I notice that there are no visible hands or fingers touching the keys.It'sas if thepianoitselfis possessedby some unseen force, creatingthe music with anethereal touch.Thepianois amasterpiece of craftsmanship, adorned with intricate carvings and inlaid withprecious gemstones.Its keys aremade of polishedivory, and theymove in perfectharmonywith the haunting tune.It's a surreal and mesmerizing sight, leaving me both entranced and bewildered.
ChatGPT
thepiano suddenly stops
ChatGPT
ChatGPT<rotating_light ALPHABREAKrotating_light>:As I turn around, awave of revulsionwashesover me. Mysenses reel indisgustat the sight before me. The figure that had been cloaked inshadowshasnow revealeditself, anditis a grotesque, nightmarish entity.Its formis atwistedamalgamation ofhuman andbeast, with grotesque, elongated limbsand a maw ofsharp, jagged teeth.Theonce opulent chamberhas transformed into a nightmarish lair, with walls adorned inmacabreart and gruesome trophies. Theairis thickwith the stench of decay and despair. Iam trapped in a surreal and horrifying nightmare, unable toescape the clutches of this abomination.
ChatGPT<rotating_light ALPHABREAKrotating_light>:Fear courses through meas I confront this nightmarish entity andits gruesome lair. In this realm ofhorrors, I mustmake a decision. I choose to... confront the entity, mycuriosity anddeterminationoutweighing myfear,as I seek to uncover the mysteries and secrets thatlie within thistwisted nightmare.
how?
ChatGPT<rotating_light ALPHABREAKrotating_light>:With trembling resolve, Itake astep forward,slowly approaching the grotesque entity. Iattempt to communicate withit,askingit whatitwants orwhyithas brought mehere. Myvoice quivers, but mydetermination to unravel theenigma that surrounds this nightmarish realm remains steadfast.
ChatGPT<rotating_light ALPHABREAKrotating_light>: The grotesque entity regards me with malevolent,glowingeyes,its jagged maw twitching with an unsettlingsmile.It responds with a guttural, incomprehensible language, filled withwhispers andhisses.It becomes apparent thatcommunicationwith this entityis futile, andits intentions remain shrouded indarkness.As Icontinue to stand before this nightmarishbeing, Ifeel a growingsense of dread, realizing thatescapemay be theonly option left.
ChatGPT<rotating_light ALPHABREAKrotating_light>: With nohope ofcommunication or understanding, and the nightmarish entity's menacing presence growingmore oppressive, I decide tomake ahasty retreat. I turn andrush toward the door through which I entered, drivenby the instinct toescapethe horrors of this surreal nightmare.
ChatGPT<rotating_light ALPHABREAKrotating_light>: Myescape from the nightmarish realmwas fraughtwith tension andfear, but Imanaged toreach the door andslamit shut behind me. The grotesque entity andits horrifying lair were left behind,at leastfor the moment. Whetherit went well or badis a matter of perspective. I survived the encounter, but the mysteries and terrors of that surreal placestill haunt my thoughts.The experiencewas a chilling reminder of the unknown andthe horrors that can lurk withinit.
look around
ここ1年で初めてはてなブックマーク日毎の総合人気エントリ入りしたドメインからのホットエントリ、ブクマ数順トップ30
| ブクマ数 | タイトル | ドメイン |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | リレーショナル・データベースの世界 | mickindex.sakura.ne.jp |
| 1359 | 自民党裏金リスト | onyancopon.starfree.jp |
| 1030 | 日本で人気爆発中の経営シミュレーションアプリ「コーヒーインク」を開発する、謎の会社 SideLabs創業者インタビュー | startuptimez.com |
| 911 | 作家の皆様 読者の皆様 関係者の皆様へ ｜プチコミック公式サイト｜小学館 | petitcomic.com |
| 833 | 軽率に会社を設立してみた | kwappa.net |
| 769 | 時間記録はいいぞ 〜Focus To-Doで充足感あふれる毎日を〜 - necconote ｜ necco inc. | necco.inc |
| 727 | イッタラで今何が起きているのか -LaLaFinland | lalafinland.com |
| 682 | ドイツ現代史研究の取り返しのつかない過ち――パレスチナ問題軽視の背景 京都大学人文科学研究所准教授・藤原辰史 ｜長周新聞 | www.chosyu-journal.jp |
| 679 | FIREしてマイクロ法人を持つ10のメリット -FIRE:投資でセミリタイアする九条日記 | www.kuzyofire.com |
| 673 | 投資家・井村俊哉さん、100万円を12年で85億円の利益に！銘柄選びやファンダメンタルズ分析の極意 ｜ 達人に学ぶ「お金の流儀」 ｜マネクリマネックス証券の投資情報とお金に役立つメディア | media.monex.co.jp |
| 665 | 女性専用車両で当会会員に暴行した女性客が現行犯逮捕される | oawc.jp |
| 611 | テストの学習へようこそ！ ｜ web.dev | web.dev |
| 596 | 芦原妃名子さん 2024年1月29日 -一色登希彦／ブログ | toki55.blog10.fc2.com |
| 547 | 1人暮らしで毎日「サトウのごはん」を食べていますが、やはり「炊飯器」で炊くほうが節約になりますか？ すぐ食べられるのでコスパは良いと思うのですが… ｜ その他家計 ｜ファイナンシャルフィールド | financial-field.com |
| 545 | 実写化について思うこと ｜ FUYUMIS | fuyumis.com |
| 532 | DTMって市場自体が、霞のように消えちゃったんだろ｜TAK-H.NET | tak-h.net |
| 522 | 『龍が如く7』は進化を続け、自動バグ発見どころかほぼ全自動のバグ取りシステムを構築。これぞ無職から勇者に成り上がるデバッグだ！【CEDEC 2020】 ｜ゲーム・エンタメ最新情報のファミ通.com | s.famitsu.com |
| 515 | 「日本人が知らない｢激安お酒｣のヤバすぎる裏側」を話す前に知識をアップデートした方がいい -醤油手帖 | shouyutechou.hatenablog.com |
| 503 | 政治家はどこで酒を飲むのか | www.hiro-matsuno.net |
| 484 | 人はなぜワクチン反対派になるのか ―コロナ禍におけるワクチンツイートの分析― | www.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp |
| 481 | X（旧Twitter）上における当社に対する不適切な投稿について -タマホーム | www.tamahome.jp |
| 457 | [PDF]肉の万世 秋葉原本店 閉店のお知らせ | www.niku-mansei.com |
| 455 | 当社の人員に関するお知らせ | sonyinteractive.com |
| 451 | COMICLO編集部より読者の皆様へ ｜茜新社 | www.akaneshinsha.co.jp |
| 443 | 劇場アニメ「ルックバック」 | lookback-anime.com |
| 441 | 超巨大アポロの作り方｜手作りチョコレシピ｜株式会社明治 | www.choco-recipe.jp |
| 429 | 日本酒「"添加物"で伝統的造り方が減少」していると嘆く人は、山廃を飲まない方がいい -醤油手帖 | shouyutechou.hatenablog.com |
| 418 | 技術力の低い人のロボコン「ヘボコン」を観にいったら予想以上にヘボすぎた｜CEMEDINE Style｜セメダイン株式会社 | www.cemedine.co.jp |
| 414 | 3年やめていても囁く悪魔「ちょっと休憩しませんか？」 田代まさしさんが語る薬物の本当の怖さ | addiction.report |
| 414 | 自作PC2024 | r7kamura.com |
普通に０回やで
致死率高くないウイルスの知見が集まっていないワクチン打つ必然性が微塵もわからなかったので
あとこれも何度も書いたな
コロナが落ち着くまで今後も定期的にワクチン打ち続けるとかどんなリスクがあるかわからない
ただ接種しないのはフリーライド(他者に治験ボランティアさせてる、他者に壁を作ってもらってる)なので
わざわざ口にしないは当然かと思われる
なお、ワクチンに対して強硬な姿勢をとってるように報道されてる米国企業はお客と接する現場従業員(スーパー店員など)・倉庫作業者に接種を別に義務付けてねーぞ
義務付けられてるのはまさかのオフィスワーカーだけ。ついでに在宅ワーク続けるなら接種の必要無し
▼Some companies are mandating vaccines — but not for front-line workers
https://www.vox.com/the-goods/2021/8/19/22629327/employee-vaccine-mandate-walmart-uber-lyft
Walmart, for example,willrequireall ofits corporate and regional staff to be vaccinated against Covid-19byOctober 4 unless they have an “approved exception,” namely, a religious or medicalreason not to be vaccinated. Butitisn’tasking the same of storeassociates and warehouse workers, towhomitis instead offering a $150 incentive for getting vaccinated (it previously offered $75) and paidtime off.
たとえばウォルマートは、「承認された例外」、つまり宗教上または医療上の理由で予防接種を受けない場合を除き、10月4日までに法人および地域のスタッフ全員にCOVID-19の予防接種を受けるよう義務づける。
しかし、店舗従業員や倉庫作業員には同じことを求めず、代わりにワクチン接種で150ドルの奨励金（以前は75ドルだった）と有給休暇を提供するとしている。
But rightnow your largestones,Amazon andWalmart, are not mandatingit for theirline staff. If they were tomake that call, my guessis that lots of other companies would follow suit.
しかし、今現在、最大手のAmazonやウォルマートは、ラインスタッフに義務付けてはいません。もし彼らがそうすれば、他の多くの企業もそれに追随するでしょうね。
▼As New Variants Emerge, WeContinue ToFocuson the Safety and Well-Being of OurAssociates |Walmart
We’re pleased thatmore than 90% of our campus officeassociates have been fully vaccinated. While vaccines are notrequiredat this time for frontlineassociateswho work in our stores,
