  |
はてなキーワード:elementsとは
はてなブックマークの増田一覧の、さらに「すべて」(1user)をチェックしている希有な人向けのユーザースクリプトを公開します。
https://b.hatena.ne.jp/site/anond.hatelabo.jp/?sort=eid
// ==UserScript==// @nameHatenaBookmarkAnond Filter// @namespacehttps://b.hatena.ne.jp/site/anond.hatelabo.jp/// @descriptionはてなブックマークの『はてな匿名ダイアリー』の記事のうち、指定したキーワードが含まれる投稿を非表示にします。// @matchhttps://b.hatena.ne.jp/site/anond.hatelabo.jp/*// @grant none// @version 1.0.2025.12.10.0005// ==/UserScript==(function(){constSCRIPTID = 'HatenaBookmarkAnondFilter';console.time(SCRIPTID);const ONCE = 1,AP = 2, INTERVAL = 3;/*適用タイミング*/const KEYWORDS = [ 'dorawii', 'あおやまちゃん', 'ボスマン', 'れめくん', '自己放尿', '性慾', 'boushi_inst', 'hakaikami',/*電気通信大学駿河台大学鉄道研究会れめくん自己放尿(頻出)*/ /*A-G*/'/akibakko6348', '/anapgoeson', '/asapgoeson', '/buscholarx', '/circlecavok', '/disney1007cla', '/dora22sibuya', '/donkotrain', '/fft_dareka', '/gmhtcyznf_abc', /*H-N*/'/h13_yokohama', '/h2twi', '/hinolovelove', '/inaken17_', '/inte235dy', '/kaoru_ai1991', '/kiha2228', '/kqlex1500', '/kurotamaxxx', '/kt_ruma_1372', '/lightningreen77', '/minamihinawot', '/minori0151', '/mukoroku651', '/nanpyong', '/nimouec', '/norannnde', /*O-U*/'/oreizmmiporin', '/pasotokon', '/pm95uq', '/reme_kun', '/s03_amurtk2731', '/sacchan03110319', '/seisu_bot', '/senanana_cos', '/shinano_115', '/shineleaf1372', '/soroisoroi', '/sweidan821858', '/tarotaromusic1', '/tx9y2cpwdz27255', '/uec15take', '/uecrail', /*V-Z_0-9*/'/wakasato_', '/yuuya_1104_uec', '/100mph_no_yuuki', '/2rtkvn34il2783', /*tadaup.jp*/'/CBUHadpD.jpeg', '/CgJlF4Wr.jpeg', '/CGTtm0Ev.jpeg', '/CIxj8clS.jpeg', '/CqbERPdQ.jpeg', '/CTZsA2wM.jpeg', '/CWY2m7rS.jpeg', '/CZVCEgd1.jpeg', 'テクウヨ', ].map(w => w.toLowerCase());const sites = { 'prefix': [ ['selector', 'modifier', 'REPEAT', '(css)'], ], 'https://b.hatena.ne.jp/site/anond.hatelabo.jp/': [ ['li.js-keyboard-selectable-item', li => KEYWORDS.some(w => (li.textContent.toLowerCase().includes(w)) && (li.querySelector('li.entrylist-contents-category > a').textContent = w) && (!li.classList.add('filtered'))),AP, `.filtered{display: none;}`], ], };const rules = sites[Object.keys(sites).find(prefix => location.href.startsWith(prefix))]; if(rules === undefined) returnconsole.log(SCRIPTID, 'Not foundany sites.');const modify = function(selector, modifier){constelements = document.querySelectorAll(selector);elements.forEach(modifier); }; /* ONCE(一括適用) */ rules.forEach(rule => {const [selector, modifier, repeat,css] = rule;console.log(SCRIPTID, 'ONCE:', selector); modify(selector, modifier); if(css){const style = document.createElement('style'); style.dataset.script =SCRIPTID; style.type = 'text/css'; style.textContent =css; document.head.appendChild(style); } }); /*AP(AutoPagerize) */ rules.filter(rule => rule[2] ===AP).forEach(rule => {const [selector, modifier, repeat] = rule; document.addEventListener('GM_AutoPagerizeNextPageLoaded', e => {console.log(SCRIPTID, 'AP:', selector); modify(selector, modifier); }); }); /* INTERVAL */ rules.filter(rule => rule[2] === INTERVAL).forEach(rule => {const [selector, modifier, repeat] = rule; setInterval(function(){console.log(SCRIPTID, 'INTERVAL:', selector); modify(selector, modifier); },1000); });console.timeEnd(SCRIPTID);})();
検索用:はてなブックマークはてブはてな匿名ダイアリー増田スパムキーワードNGワードフィルターミュート非表示 削除 隠すブロックユーザースクリプトユーザースタイルhatenabookmarkanondspam keywordsngwords filter mutehide hidden display none blockuserscriptJavaScriptjscss style
いきなりMacだけ支給はつらいよね…。ポイントだけサクッと。
・アプリ間の切り替え
→command押しっぱなしでtab をトントンすると順送り、
Mac:command(⌘) + `（数字の1の左にあるキー）
アプリごとのウィンドウだけ見たい場合は control + ↓
この3つ覚えれば、とりあえずAlt+Tab 周りのストレスはかなり減るはず。
[2] Ctrl+Backspace でATOK の変換結果をUndo したい
Windows だと
「確定をやめて入力中に戻す」＝ Ctrl + Backspace
がデフォルトですよね。
です。
atok.com
・Macの「delete」キーは、Windowsでいう Backspace（左側を消すキー）なので、
MacBookのキーボードなら「control を押しながらdelete」でOKです。
・注意点
確定直後じゃないと効かない（間にカーソルを動かしたり別の文字を打つとNG）
atok.com
効かないアプリもたまにある（ATOK公式もそう書いてます）。
もし効きが悪かったら、
メニューバーの「あ」/「A」アイコン →ATOKメニュー →環境設定 → 「キー・ローマ字カスタマイザ」
atok.com
[3] 「WinでできてMacでできない」問題がつらいときの小技
ざっくり挙げると、
・ウィンドウ最大化が弱い → 「control +command + F」でフルスクリーン
・Windows風のショートカットに寄せたい → Karabiner-Elements でキー入れ替え
・ウィンドウスナップ（Win+矢印）欲しい → Rectangle みたいな無料アプリを入れる
あたりを入れておくと、かなり「Windows脳」でも生きやすくなります。
とりあえず、
command + `
この3つだけ、まず指に覚えさせるのがおすすめ。
Also not paying taxesontipsis an incredibly stupid way togo about distributing a taxbenefit. Ifyou want to cut taxes for lower income, do that.Change the income thresholds or the marginal taxrate,don’t justchange taxeson an incomestream thatis mostly correlated with lower incomes.
Serverhere. Iwas saying this the firsttime he announcedit.Wtf would WEget this bonus and nooneelse. MakesZEROsense untilyourealize... hewas buyingyounger votes
Not to mention tippingisout of hand asitis, we shouldn’t be trying to createmore tax incentives forit.
Worse than that.Itlets themtie tax breakextensions to a future, wildly unpopular bill. That’s how “theBig Beautiful Bill”got passed. Noonewasgoing to vote to notextend thelast round of temporary tax cuts for the middle class. They wouldcrow about the other problems in the bill, butthe powers that be weren’tgoing to removeany of the problemelements. They would just labelanyonewho didn’t vote for the billas for a tax increase...........
なるほど
https://chatgpt.com/share/68a286f8-516c-800f-b2cd-a5f510620a61
国 推計額（概数） 出典メモ ロシア 約 **75兆** Statista の「天然資源価値」ランキングに基づく要約。([Reddit][1]) アメリカ 約 **45兆** 同上。([Reddit][1]) サウジアラビア 約 **34兆** 同上。([Reddit][1]) 中国 約 **23兆** 同上。([Reddit][1]) ウクライナ **約11〜15兆**（さらに広い推計では最大26兆） ウクライナの鉱物資源価値を11〜15兆ドル規模とする報道・解説。より大きい推計として「最大26兆」もあるが不確実性が高い。([マーケットウォッチ][2], [Visual CapitalistElements][3], [HungarianConservative][4]) アフガニスタン **約1兆**（1〜3兆の幅） レアアース等を含む鉱物資源価値の米政府・USGS系報告を踏まえた推計が繰り返し引用。([Encyclopedia Britannica][5]) カザフスタン **（信頼できる一括推計なし）** 資源依存度は高いが、国全体の「埋蔵価値」合算は公的・一貫手法の数字が見当たらず。参考：資源所得がGDPの高比率を占める、鉱業詳細はUSGS年報。([ワールドバンク][6], [TheGlobalEconomy.com][7], [米国地質調査出版物倉庫][8]) ベラルーシ **（信頼できる一括推計なし）** カリ（potash）が主力。総額評価は見当たらず。([米国地質調査出版物倉庫][9]) 日本 **（信頼できる一括推計なし）** 可採な地下資源は相対的に小さい。メタンハイドレートなど海底資源は存在するが商業化・価値算定は不確実。([Encyclopedia Britannica][10], [netl.doe.gov][11])
「ハックアンドスラッシュ」＝「敵を倒して報酬を得る」という用法自体が和製英語でもなんでもなく、1980年代から確立したゲーム用語だと元記事で解説してあるのにそれが読み取れない増田の記事
わかりやすく簡単に言うと、hack andslash は「敵を薙ぎ倒して報酬を得ること」じゃなく「敵を倒すこと」を指すんだよ。
もともとはRPG（日本で言うTRPG）発祥の言葉で、捜査や謎解き等で進むゲームプレイと対照するための用語だよ。戦闘によって進むゲームプレイってことだよ。
こっちが間違ってると思うなら自分でちゃんと調べて、信頼できる出典をつけてくれよ。
あと、その増田を書き込むと同時に元記事の著者本人のアカウントでもブクマで全く同じ反論してきちゃってるから、顔真っ赤でなんとかして叩こうとしてると思われるぞ。
増田とブクマどっちも、普段のXのポストと文体も句読点の使い方も同じやぞｗ。匿名で書けばバレないわけじゃないから気をつけろよ〜。これ書いてやってるの優しさだからな。
jzunkodj4yゲーム用語の「ハックアンドスラッシュ」は1980年代からTRPG界隈で意味が確立して、アクション界隈で別の使われるようになったのは2000年以降の後付けだと指摘しておきます /和製英語でなく英語圏でもそういう意味です
元記事の著者がつけてくれたこの変なブコメを見て、なんか「そもそもこっちもその意味では使ってなくて～」みたいな逃げ方をしてきそうだと思ったので、念のため「ハックアンドスラッシュ」をDiabloみたいなloot-based game（日本語で言えばトレハンゲーム）のことだと勘違いしてる箇所を引用しておくね。
こっちはめんどくさいからこんなことしたくないんだよ。中立な第三者の皆さんはブコメかトラバでどっちが正しいかジャッジしてやってください。
なお、海外製の伝統的ローグライクに馴染みのない方は驚くかもしれませんが、本作ではいつでも使用できる「ポータルの魔法」でこの拠点に戻ってくることができます（但し、ポータルの魔法を唱えてからポータルが開くまでは約12ターンを要するので追い詰められてピンチのときに即拠点へ……という使い方は難しい）。このあたりは、『ディアブロ』などのハックアンドスラッシュゲームを遊ばれている人の方がピンときそうですが……そのあたりの解説は、あとに回すとしましょう。
それハックアンドスラッシュゲームの特徴じゃないですよね？
確かに接頭辞がランダムで付くマジックアイテムや、さまざまな特性を持つチャンピオンモンスター、いつでもタウンポータルで拠点と行き来できる点など、『ディアブロ』系のハックアンドスラッシュゲームと本作に共通する点は数多くあります。
それハックアンドスラッシュゲームの特徴じゃないですよね？
それを知るために、コンピューターRPGにおける「ハックアンドスラッシュ」の定義を改めて解説しておきましょう。様々な定義が乱立している……とされるこの言葉ですが、RPGにおける歴史からすれば大まかな定義ははっきりとしていて、「敵を薙ぎ倒して報酬を得ること」です。
「報酬を得ること」はハックアンドスラッシュの定義に含まないですよね？
その後、世界各国のオタクたちの間で『Rogue』を拡張する試みが同時多発的に生まれました。これが「ローグライク」のはじまりです。それらの作品の中には『Rogue』では一部の再現に留められていた『AD&D』要素の再現をもっと突き詰めていこう……といった作品も少なくありません。職業やさまざまなマジックアイテムの要素を導入した『NetHack』、接頭辞付きユニークアイテムの自動生成などを実装した『Angband』などはその代表例といえるでしょう。こうして、伝統的ローグライクの中に『D&D』『AD&D』由来の「ハックアンドスラッシュ」要素を持つ作品が多数生まれたのです。
それハックアンドスラッシュ要素じゃないですよね？
本連載第5回で紹介した『風来のシレン』、および『トルネコの大冒険』にしても、初代『Rogue』の「ハックアンドスラッシュ」よりは「一期一会のダンジョン探索を楽しむゲーム性」が重視されており、これらのゲームのエンドコンテンツは「道具を持ち込めない、プレイヤーの知識と運が頼りの、一期一会の"もっと不思議"」が主流となっていることがほとんどです。これらの影響で、和製ローグライクは「プレイヤーの知識を活かす1度限りの冒険」に重きが置かれているものが多いのが現状です。
ハックアンドスラッシュを「敵を倒してアイテムを獲得してプレイヤーを強化するサイクルのゲーム」だと思い込んでいなければ、「一期一会」「1度限り」をハックアンドスラッシュとの対比として取り上げないですよね？ 本当は「一期一会」「1度限り」でもハックアンドスラッシュは成立するんだから。
勘違いしないでほしいのは、「ハックアンドスラッシュ要素にも重きを置いた、海外発伝統的ローグライク」と「死んだら終わり、一期一会の冒険を重視した国産伝統的ローグライク」に優劣があるという事ではない点です。これらは「ゲームの方向性の違い」であり、そのどちらにも優劣はありません。
「ハックアンドスラッシュ」と「死んだら終わり、一期一会」は対照的ではないですよね？ これもハックアンドスラッシュをトレハンゲームのことだと思いこんでなければ出てこない文章ですよね？
さて、『Tangledeep』の話に戻りましょう。本作は「ハックアンドスラッシュ」系要素の強い伝統的ローグライクですが、序盤（特に6Fあたり）までは通常攻撃のみでやっていけるような、ゆるいバランスに抑えられています。
他のローグライクと比べてTangledeepのハックアンドスラッシュ要素は強くないですよね？強いのは「非パーマデスのアイテム収集とプレイヤー強化」の要素であり、それってハックアンドスラッシュと関係ないですよね？ 一応書いておくけどこっちは当然RogueもTangledeepもDiabloもAngbandもDnDもプレイしてるからな。
こっちが主張している定義が正しいことは自明すぎて逆に証明が難しいので、AIにかわりに出してもらった結果を書いておくね。
「ハックアンドスラッシュ」という言葉の本来の意味に、「報酬を得ること」は含まれますか？ 含まれませんか？ 出典を提示して教えてください。
「ハックアンドスラッシュ（hack andslash）」という語が最初に使われたのは1980年ごろのTRPG／MUD界隈で、「ストーリー性の乏しい暴力中心のプレイスタイル」という意味でした。
そこで強調されていたのは「敵を倒す戦闘そのもの」であり、「報酬（戦利品・アイテム収集）を得ること」は本義には含まれていません。
1990年代半ば以降、Diablo など“戦利品稼ぎ”が主目的のアクションRPGが人気を博した結果、「ハクスラ＝敵を倒してレア装備を掘る」というイメージが日本で定着しましたが、これは後年派生した用法です。
Dragon 誌 #39（1980年）を引用するWikipedia では、ハックアンドスラッシュとは“campaigns ofviolence with no other plotelements or significant goal（暴力だけで他に大きな目的や筋立てがないプレイ）”と定義されています。
ここで「戦闘こそが目的」とされており、“reward/loot”には触れられていません。
MUD／MMO 系の用語集でも“refers to a type of gameplay that emphasizes combat”とだけ述べ、報酬要素には言及していません。
muds.fandom.com
2006 年のMMORPG.comフォーラムでは“Hack andslashis … defeating enemies andmonsters in combat, with no plot or other goal worth mentioning.”と“目的なき戦闘”を強調しています。
このようにコミュニティでも「戦闘中心＝ハックアンドスラッシュ」であって、「報酬獲得」は必須条件と見なされていません。
1996 年『Diablo』以降、“敵を倒してランダム戦利品を集める”型のアクションRPGが人気化し、英語圏でも “looting-focusedhack-and-slash” のような表現が登場。
日本では略語「ハクスラ」が広まり、「敵を倒して装備を厳選する」≒ハクスラという新しい意味が強く浸透しました。
ただしこれはオリジナルの語義ではなく、後付けの特徴 という点に留意が必要です。
本来の「hack andslash」の定義に「報酬を得ること」は含まれません。
戦闘（hack＝斬る／slash＝叩き切る）そのものに焦点を当てた言葉であり、報酬・ドロップ収集は後年派生した一要素に過ぎません。
ただちょっと読んでいて気になる点があったので聞いてみたい。
自分は日本の所謂「ハクスラ」の用法しかよく知らなかった（あとついでにRogueもやったことない）素人なので全然的外れかもしれないが・・・・。
The term "hack andslash"was originally used to describe a play style in tabletop role-playing games, carryingover from there to MUDs, massively multiplayeronline role-playing games, and role-playing video games. In arcade andconsole styleaction video games, the termhas an entirely different usage, specifically referring toaction games with afocuson real-time combat with hand-to-hand weaponsas opposed to guns or fists. Thetwo types ofhack-and-slash games are largely unrelated, thoughaction role-playing gamesmay combineelements of both.
ここでは「RPGにおけるhack andslash」と「アクションゲームにおけるhack andslash」という２つのhack andslashがあり、
「the termhas an entirely different usage,」 「Thetwo types ofhack-and-slash games are largely unrelated,」とあるように歴史的にも定義的にもそれらは別のもの（しかし両方を兼ねるものもある）と読める。
で、気になったのはこの「RPGにおけるhack andslash」と「アクションゲームにおけるhack andslash」が増田の言う「日本語の「ハクスラ」 」と「英語の「hack andslash」 」に重なっている様に見えた事だ。
で、もしそうだとすると増田の「英語の/日本語の」という２分法は正確ではなく、本来は「アクションの/RPGの」とすべきだった可能性があるようにも思えてくる。（何故なら「RPGの」も英語版の用法で説明されているので）
更に増田は「 『Dungeons and Dragons』のような当然英語の用法で参照すべき作品」と記事への批判と根拠としていた『Dungeons and Dragons』は「アクションの/RPGの」では「RPGの」に属すると思われるため、
（もし増田が「アクションの」を本来のhack andslashだと考えている場合）「 『Dungeons and Dragons』のような当然RPGの用法で参照すべき作品」というように、むしろ逆になってしまうようにも思える。
「アクションの/RPGの」の２分法が正解だった場合、「RPGの」の方のhack andslashには近接武器を用いて戦うだけでなく、その報酬（アイテムやゲーム内通貨や経験値など？）にも着目することは特に不自然ではないように見える（が、前述の通り素人なのでよく分からない）
のだけど、一方で「 『Rogue』自体が該当しない条項が「ベルリン解釈」に存在するわけない」については「たしかにそうかも」と思ったので、
ベルリン解釈の部分については増田の方が正しい可能性が高いんじゃないか？と思ってる。
という訳でいろいろ細かい事は書いたものの、最終的な結論としては増田側が正しい可能性がありそう、と思ってる。
ただ増田が他者に厳密性を求める以上、自身も（例え総論や結論が正しくても）細かい点を突っ込まれる事は許容せざるを得ないのでは？と思い（まぁ、というよりは自分の疑問の解決のために）書いてみた。
（ちなみにRogueをやった事が無いので分からないんだけど、敵を倒した際の報酬って無いの？一応ネットで攻略情報を軽く調べた結果、アイテムドロップも経験値もなさそう？とは思ったけど・・・だとすると敵と戦う意味はあまり無い（可能なら回避が正義？）ゲームなのかな？）
Let’s faceit: starting a conversationon a dating app canfeel terrifying.You seesomeoneyou’re interested in,you typeout amessage, and then…youdeleteit. “Is this too boring?” “Will they even respond?” “What if I sound awkward?”
We’veall been there. That firstmessage canmake orbreakyour chances ofconnecting withsomeone amazing. Buthere’s thegood news:youdon’t have tooverthink it.With the rightopeningline,you canspark a conversation thatfeelsnatural,fun, and meaningful.
AtMixerDates, webelieve that every greatconnection starts with a great conversation. That’swhy we’ve puttogether this guide to helpyoucraft the best dating appopeninglines—ones that standout, showyour personality, andlead to realconnections. Ready to ditch the “hey” and start making animpact?Let’sdive in!
[:contents]
Before weget into the bestopeninglines,let’stalk aboutwhyyour firstmessageis so important.
Youropeninglineisyour chance tomake a greatfirst impression.It’s thegateway to a conversation that couldlead tosomething special. A thoughtful,creativemessage shows thatyou’re genuinely interested—not just swiping mindlessly.
Your firstmessage sets thetone for the entire conversation. A boring orgenericopener mightlead to a dull chat, while afun or intriguingone canspark excitement andcuriosity.
Let’s be real: everyonelovesfeeling special. Whenyou put effort intoyouropeningline,it shows thatyou care enough to standout. AndonMixerDates, where wevalue authenticity and positivity, that effortgoes a long way.
Now,let’sget to thegood stuff—the best dating appopeninglines that actually work. These are divided intocategories to suit different personalities and situations.
Whilethe examples above are great starting points, the bestopeninglines are theones thatfeel authentic toyou.Here are sometips to helpyoucraftyour own:
Referencesomething from theirprofile—aphoto, a hobby, or ashared interest.It showsyou’re payingattention and not just copying and pasting.
Avoid heavy oroverly serious topics right off the bat. Keep thetonelight and playful tomake the conversation enjoyable.
Don’ttry to besomeoneyou’re not. Ifyou’renaturallyfunny, lean into that. Ifyou’remore thoughtful,go for asincere compliment or question.
“Hey” or “What’s up?” might be easy, but they’re also forgettable. Put in alittle effort to standout.
This gives the other person an easy way to respond and keeps the conversation flowing.
AtMixerDates, we’reall about creating a positive,inclusive space whereyou canfeel comfortablebeingyourself.Here’swhy our platformis the best place to put theseopeninglines into practice:
We welcome everyone, no matterwhoyou are orwhoyoulove. Our platformis designed to be a safe space whereyou canconnect withlike-minded people.
Our users create detailedprofiles thatmakeit easy to findshared interests andcraft personalizedopeninglines.
We encourage our community to be genuine and kind, soyou canfeel confident starting conversations withoutfear of judgment or rejection.
Don’t justtake ourword forit—here’s whatone of our users had to say:
“I met my partneronMixerDates, anditallstarted with asimplemessage about oursharedlove for travel. The conversation flowednaturally, and therestishistory. I’m so grateful for this platform!”
While a greatopeningline canspark a conversation,building a realconnectiontakesmore than just a clevermessage.Here are thekeyelements tolook for when seeking a meaningfulconnection:
A strongconnection starts with alignmenton the things that mattermost. Doyoushare similarvalues,lifegoals, or visions forthe future?
Look forsomeonewhoiswilling toshare their thoughts,feelings, and vulnerabilities—andwho encouragesyou to do the same.
Healthy relationships are atwo-way street. Both people should be putting in effort to communicate, plan dates, and support each other.
Atrueconnectionallows both people to be themselves without judgment.Look forsomeonewho celebratesyour uniqueness and encouragesyou to pursueyour passions.
Communicationis the foundation ofany strong relationship. A mutualconnection thrivesonhonesty, transparency, and the ability to resolve conflicts in ahealthy way.
AtMixerDates, we’rehere to helpyou find thesekeyelements in a partner. Our platformis designed toconnectyou with peoplewhoshareyourvaluesand arelooking for the same thingsyou are. Starting a conversationon a dating app doesn’t have to be stressful.With the rightopeningline,you canspark aconnection thatfeelsnatural,fun, and meaningful.And atMixerDates, we’rehere to helpyou everystep of the way.
So, what areyou waiting for?Craft that perfectopeningline,joinMixerDates, and startconnecting with peoplewhovalue authenticity and positivity.Your perfectmatchisout there—and they’re justonemessageaway.
Please consider the histroy ofhumanity from biologicalperpsecitve and currentknown fact in nearbyuniverse, whichexpo-planet (from theSol systemperspective)ismostlikely to have civlizaedsociety? Pleaseaddpercentagenext toit in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanetcivilizationlikelihoodを28 秒行う
OK, I’mlookingatthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon an exoplanet within ourSolar System.I’ll consider biologicalhistory and current space knowledge,aiming to identifythe most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from ourSolar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard'sStar, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1,focusingon their habitablezonesand available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilizedsocietylikelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m notingkey exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which haveEarth-like characteristicsand are in habitablezones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advancedcivilizations.
I'm gathering infoonplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, consideringfactorslikemagneticfields,atmospheres, and proximity to G-typestars for their potential to support advancedcivilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despitebeing closeand around ared dwarfstar, might supportlife ifithas amagneticfieldand atmosphere. This makes me think aboutits potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimatingcivilization probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculativepercentagesbasedon the Drake equation and the lack ofevidence for intelligentlife.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names andcivilizationlikelihoodpercentages, grounded in the longtimeline oflife'sevolution, despite the speculativenature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering theirstar types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advancedcivilizations from oursolar system'sviewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due toits closeness and observational potential, despite concerns aboutitsflarestar dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'mfocusingon exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, andK2-18b,aiming to chart theirlikelihood of hosting a civilizedsocietybasedon current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety, consideringEarth's long biologicalhistory.
Refining odds
I'm considering theastronomicaltimeline for intelligentlifeonEarth,leading me toassign evenlower speculative odds for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrarypercentages, clearly noting the speculativenature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience'sbasic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrarypercentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculativenature, and ensuring the datais accessible foryoung audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating amarkdowntable with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of civilizedlifeon exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoreticalnature and considering the understandinglevel of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mappingout amarkdown chart with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon exoplanets, mindful of thecomplexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecingtogethermarkdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b'sreduced civilizedlife chance due to thered dwarf's activity. This inclusionhighlights the speculativenature of the analysis.
Piecingtogether speculative odds
I’m detailing amarkdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanetlikelihoods, considering environmental challengesand adding a disclaimer about the speculativenature and lack ofevidence.
Piecingtogether
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b forits proximity and silentstar, butI’lladd a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advancedcivilizations' hypotheticallikelihood.
Assessingcivilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligentlifeonEarth, which suggests that the odds ofany habitableplanet developing acomplexcivilization might beaslowas a fewpercent.
Belowis a very speculative chart that—basedon what we know aboutEarth’s long, windingpath fromsimplelife to a “civilizedsociety” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives somefun,made‑uppercentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists havenot yetfoundany proof oflife (let alone advancedcivilizations)onany exoplanet. Thesenumbers are just playful estimates to helpyou think about theideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an AdvancedCivilizationon Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet EstimatedLikelihood of a CivilizedSociety
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
HowDid We (Very Roughly) Guess TheseNumbers?
Earth’s Example:
OnEarth,life beganassimple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that builtcomplex societies. This longjourney suggests that—even if aplanetis in the “habitablezone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilizedsociety might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
Thisis the closest exoplanet to us. Even thoughitsstar (Proxima Centauri)is ared dwarf that sometimes sendsout strongflares (which might harmlife),its closeness makesitone of ourmost interesting candidates. That’swhy we giveit a slightly higher guess (~2%).
Theseplanets are part of agroup orbiting a verycoolstar. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaningone sidealwaysfaces thestar), so the chance of acomplex, advancedcivilization might be abitlower.
LHS 1140 b:
Thisplanetis promising in some ways butis alittle fartherawayand around a dimmerstar, so our playful estimateis evenlower.
All of thesepercentages are extremely rough guessesbasedon whatlittle we understand about the conditions forlife andintelligence. Scientists useideaslike the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concreteevidence, thesenumbers remain just forfun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring theseideas—and remember, spaceis full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equationitself and see if this euqationis acculate ormore opition in the equationyouwill use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation'svalue
OK, let me see. The Drake Equationisn't a precise formula;it'smore of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluatingits conceptualnature,its uncertain parameters, andits criticism to concludeonits reliabilityas an accurate predictivemodel.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mappingout the Drake Equationas a conceptual guide, detailingits parameters, which are oftenbasedon estimates or opinions, to evaluateits reliability for predicting extraterrestrialcivilizations.
The Drake Equationis a famous formula thatwas created to help scientists think about the manyfactors involved in estimating thenumber of detectable extraterrestrialcivilizations in ourgalaxy. However, when welookat the equation closely, we see thatitismore of a conceptualframework or heuristictool than a precise, predictive formula.Let’sbreak downwhy:
The equationis usually writtenas:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The averagerate ofstar formationper year in ourgalaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of thosestars that haveplanetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The averagenumber ofplanets that could potentially supportlifeperstar withplanets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of thoseplanets wherelife actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction ofplanets withlife where intelligentlife evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction ofcivilizations that develop technology that releases detectablesignals into space.
𝐿
L: The length oftime suchcivilizations release detectablesignals.
Why the Drake EquationIsMore of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction ofstars withplanets), have become better known through modernastronomy.
The parameters related to the development oflife andintelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—arebasedon very limited data. For example,Earthis theonlyplanet we know wherelifehas developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for thesefactors. This means that thevalues chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of PossibleValues:
Because many of thesefactors are not well-constrained, ifyouchangeone of themore uncertain parameters even slightly, thefinal estimate for
𝑁
N (thenumber ofcivilizations) can varyby many orders ofmagnitude. This wide range shows that the equation canlead to very differentoutcomesbasedonpersonal or theoreticalassumptions.
The Drake Equationwas never meant to provide a preciseanswer. Instead,it servesas a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrialcivilizations.It encourages discussion about the relative importance of differentfactors andhighlights where our scientific knowledgeis limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate orMore Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In thesense ofbeing a strict mathematicalmodel with well-defined inputs and predictableoutputs, the Drake Equationis not accurate.Its accuracyis limitedbythe extreme uncertainties in several ofitskey parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning theevolution oflife andintelligence, arebasedon opinion, interpretation, and the single example ofEarth. Therefore, while thestructure of the equationis logical, thenumbersyou put intoit (and hence thefinal result) are oftenmore reflective of our current opinionsand assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equationis a valuabletool for framing the question of extraterrestriallife.It helps scientists and enthusiastsbreak down acomplex problem into smaller,more manageable questions. However, because several ofitsfactors are highly uncertain and subject topersonal interpretation,itismore of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of thenumber of extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Insummary, while the Drake Equationis useful for thinking about the variousfactors that mightlead to the emergence of acivilization,itsoutputs should betakenas highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the longhistory ofSol system and nearbyplanets and see if thereisany possiblites that inonetime intelligentlife emerged in nearbyplanets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-humanintelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-humanintelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligentlife forms in theSol system and neighboringplanets, and how this mightfactor into the equation.
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligentlife, possiblyonMars orEuropa, into the Drake Equation for theSol system and neighboringplanets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligentlife emergingonMars orVenus, thoughEarth remains theonly knownlife-supportingplanet in thesolar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligentlife could have emergedonplanetslikeMars,Venus, orEuropa, and how thispossibility alignswith the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligentlifeonMars orVenus could intersectwith theassumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems tofocussolelyonEarth-basedevolution.
I’m piecingtogether the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligentlife in thesolar system.Mars,Venus, and Titan present challenges, butEuropa and Enceladus might harbor microbiallife.
Please consider the histroy ofhumanity from biologicalperpsecitve and currentknown fact in nearbyuniverse, whichexpo-planet (from theSol systemperspective)ismostlikely to have civlizaedsociety? Pleaseaddpercentagenext toit in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanetcivilizationlikelihoodを28 秒行う
OK, I’mlookingatthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon an exoplanet within ourSolar System.I’ll consider biologicalhistory and current space knowledge,aiming to identifythe most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from ourSolar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard'sStar, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1,focusingon their habitablezonesand available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilizedsocietylikelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m notingkey exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which haveEarth-like characteristicsand are in habitablezones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advancedcivilizations.
I'm gathering infoonplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, consideringfactorslikemagneticfields,atmospheres, and proximity to G-typestars for their potential to support advancedcivilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despitebeing closeand around ared dwarfstar, might supportlife ifithas amagneticfieldand atmosphere. This makes me think aboutits potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimatingcivilization probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculativepercentagesbasedon the Drake equation and the lack ofevidence for intelligentlife.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names andcivilizationlikelihoodpercentages, grounded in the longtimeline oflife'sevolution, despite the speculativenature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering theirstar types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advancedcivilizations from oursolar system'sviewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due toits closeness and observational potential, despite concerns aboutitsflarestar dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'mfocusingon exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, andK2-18b,aiming to chart theirlikelihood of hosting a civilizedsocietybasedon current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety, consideringEarth's long biologicalhistory.
Refining odds
I'm considering theastronomicaltimeline for intelligentlifeonEarth,leading me toassign evenlower speculative odds for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrarypercentages, clearly noting the speculativenature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience'sbasic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrarypercentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculativenature, and ensuring the datais accessible foryoung audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating amarkdowntable with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of civilizedlifeon exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoreticalnature and considering the understandinglevel of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mappingout amarkdown chart with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon exoplanets, mindful of thecomplexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecingtogethermarkdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b'sreduced civilizedlife chance due to thered dwarf's activity. This inclusionhighlights the speculativenature of the analysis.
Piecingtogether speculative odds
I’m detailing amarkdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanetlikelihoods, considering environmental challengesand adding a disclaimer about the speculativenature and lack ofevidence.
Piecingtogether
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b forits proximity and silentstar, butI’lladd a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advancedcivilizations' hypotheticallikelihood.
Assessingcivilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligentlifeonEarth, which suggests that the odds ofany habitableplanet developing acomplexcivilization might beaslowas a fewpercent.
Belowis a very speculative chart that—basedon what we know aboutEarth’s long, windingpath fromsimplelife to a “civilizedsociety” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives somefun,made‑uppercentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists havenot yetfoundany proof oflife (let alone advancedcivilizations)onany exoplanet. Thesenumbers are just playful estimates to helpyou think about theideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an AdvancedCivilizationon Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet EstimatedLikelihood of a CivilizedSociety
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
HowDid We (Very Roughly) Guess TheseNumbers?
Earth’s Example:
OnEarth,life beganassimple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that builtcomplex societies. This longjourney suggests that—even if aplanetis in the “habitablezone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilizedsociety might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
Thisis the closest exoplanet to us. Even thoughitsstar (Proxima Centauri)is ared dwarf that sometimes sendsout strongflares (which might harmlife),its closeness makesitone of ourmost interesting candidates. That’swhy we giveit a slightly higher guess (~2%).
Theseplanets are part of agroup orbiting a verycoolstar. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaningone sidealwaysfaces thestar), so the chance of acomplex, advancedcivilization might be abitlower.
LHS 1140 b:
Thisplanetis promising in some ways butis alittle fartherawayand around a dimmerstar, so our playful estimateis evenlower.
All of thesepercentages are extremely rough guessesbasedon whatlittle we understand about the conditions forlife andintelligence. Scientists useideaslike the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concreteevidence, thesenumbers remain just forfun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring theseideas—and remember, spaceis full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equationitself and see if this euqationis acculate ormore opition in the equationyouwill use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation'svalue
OK, let me see. The Drake Equationisn't a precise formula;it'smore of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluatingits conceptualnature,its uncertain parameters, andits criticism to concludeonits reliabilityas an accurate predictivemodel.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mappingout the Drake Equationas a conceptual guide, detailingits parameters, which are oftenbasedon estimates or opinions, to evaluateits reliability for predicting extraterrestrialcivilizations.
The Drake Equationis a famous formula thatwas created to help scientists think about the manyfactors involved in estimating thenumber of detectable extraterrestrialcivilizations in ourgalaxy. However, when welookat the equation closely, we see thatitismore of a conceptualframework or heuristictool than a precise, predictive formula.Let’sbreak downwhy:
The equationis usually writtenas:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The averagerate ofstar formationper year in ourgalaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of thosestars that haveplanetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The averagenumber ofplanets that could potentially supportlifeperstar withplanets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of thoseplanets wherelife actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction ofplanets withlife where intelligentlife evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction ofcivilizations that develop technology that releases detectablesignals into space.
𝐿
L: The length oftime suchcivilizations release detectablesignals.
Why the Drake EquationIsMore of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction ofstars withplanets), have become better known through modernastronomy.
The parameters related to the development oflife andintelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—arebasedon very limited data. For example,Earthis theonlyplanet we know wherelifehas developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for thesefactors. This means that thevalues chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of PossibleValues:
Because many of thesefactors are not well-constrained, ifyouchangeone of themore uncertain parameters even slightly, thefinal estimate for
𝑁
N (thenumber ofcivilizations) can varyby many orders ofmagnitude. This wide range shows that the equation canlead to very differentoutcomesbasedonpersonal or theoreticalassumptions.
The Drake Equationwas never meant to provide a preciseanswer. Instead,it servesas a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrialcivilizations.It encourages discussion about the relative importance of differentfactors andhighlights where our scientific knowledgeis limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate orMore Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In thesense ofbeing a strict mathematicalmodel with well-defined inputs and predictableoutputs, the Drake Equationis not accurate.Its accuracyis limitedbythe extreme uncertainties in several ofitskey parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning theevolution oflife andintelligence, arebasedon opinion, interpretation, and the single example ofEarth. Therefore, while thestructure of the equationis logical, thenumbersyou put intoit (and hence thefinal result) are oftenmore reflective of our current opinionsand assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equationis a valuabletool for framing the question of extraterrestriallife.It helps scientists and enthusiastsbreak down acomplex problem into smaller,more manageable questions. However, because several ofitsfactors are highly uncertain and subject topersonal interpretation,itismore of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of thenumber of extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Insummary, while the Drake Equationis useful for thinking about the variousfactors that mightlead to the emergence of acivilization,itsoutputs should betakenas highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the longhistory ofSol system and nearbyplanets and see if thereisany possiblites that inonetime intelligentlife emerged in nearbyplanets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-humanintelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-humanintelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligentlife forms in theSol system and neighboringplanets, and how this mightfactor into the equation.
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligentlife, possiblyonMars orEuropa, into the Drake Equation for theSol system and neighboringplanets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligentlife emergingonMars orVenus, thoughEarth remains theonly knownlife-supportingplanet in thesolar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligentlife could have emergedonplanetslikeMars,Venus, orEuropa, and how thispossibility alignswith the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligentlifeonMars orVenus could intersectwith theassumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems tofocussolelyonEarth-basedevolution.
I’m piecingtogether the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligentlife in thesolar system.Mars,Venus, and Titan present challenges, butEuropa and Enceladus might harbor microbiallife.
ごめんなさい、今更気づきました！！
言及していたのはプルンチットにあるホテルオークラに入ってるElementsです！駅直結なので是非！
---
せっかくなので思い出したあれこれを書いておく
プルンチットらへんは個人的に好きなお店が多くて、色々行った
それ以外に行った有名なところは…
あとは、こういう高くて旨い店もよかったけど、何だかんだ思い出すのは現地の人に連れて行ってもらった何でも無い店かもしれない。
The topic ofBoys'Love (BL) andits community can be a sensitive andcomplex subject, with varying opinions and feelings among individuals.It's important to approach such discussions withrespect and understanding for different perspectives.
Boys'Love, also knownas Yaoi,is a genre of fictional media that focuseson romantic and/or sexual relationshipsbetweenmale characters.It originated inJapan andhas gained a diverseinternational audience. The genre encompasses a wide range of works, including manga,anime, novels, and fan-created content, often producedby and for women but enjoyedby a broader audience.
TheBL communityis known foritspassionate fanbase, which actively engages in creating and sharing fan works, suchasfan fiction andfan art. Thiscreativeexpressionis a testament to theimpact of the genreonits fans and the ways in whichitinspires them to explorecomplex themes oflove, identity, andsociety.
However,as withany fandom, there can beaspects that some individuals find uncomfortable or problematic.It'scrucial for communities to foster an environment where constructive criticism andopen dialogue can occur, allowing forgrowth and understanding. Discussions about content, representation, and fan practices should beinclusive and considerate, acknowledging the diverse range of feelings and viewpoints within the community.
In conclusion, theBL genre andits communitycontribute significantly to the landscape of modern media and fan culture. While theremay beelements that are contentious or evoke strong reactions,it's the sharedpassion for storytelling and character exploration that unites fans.As the genrecontinues to evolve,itwill undoubtedlycontinue tospark discussions andinspire creativity amongits audience.
For those interested in learningmore about the genre andits culturalimpact, there are numerous resources and scholarly works available that delve into thehistory, themes, and significance ofBoys'Love in bothJapanese and global contexts. Exploring these can provide a deeper understanding of the genre andits community.
あーでもないこーでもない…macだとこんなに便利とかWindowsだと標準装備だぞとかバカなのかなと思いながら。
■Alfred
Spotlightで十分では？ appの起動もファイル検索も電卓()もできるじゃん。
一回入れてみたけどよくわからんかった。細々したコマンド入力するのもダルい。マウス操作で良い。
トラックパットでもちもち仕事してる人向け？マウス縛りしてるひとにはいいのかも。
キーボードに集中していて、マウスに持ち替えるたび意識が阻害されるタイプの職種のひとには合ってると思う。
■BetterTouchTool
わからない。いらない。
やっぱノート民が主語を拡張してmacで〜〜〜とか言ってるだけな気がする。
トラックパット上で3本指4本指で肩をすぼませてちまちま操作するならマウス使ってダイナミックに操作しようぜ。そっちの方がストレスフリーよ。
■Karabiner-Elements
イキってUSキーを買ったバカタレが英語/かなキーの割り当てのためだけに導入するアプリってイメージ
あのあの、最初からJISキーにすればいいですよね。え、JISキーは美しくない？シンプルじゃない？
見た目のためにわざわざ外部アプリを入れてごちゃごちゃ設定する方が美しくないしシンプルじゃないと思います。
ハード面で余計な選択をしてその解決のために余計なソフトを入れるってかなり美意識を疑う。クソみたいなマッチポンプ。
■Yoink
ちっちゃい画面で仕事してるひと向け？
■JeditΩ
■Clipy
まあそれとは別によく使う文章を登録できるので仕事上良く使う注釈などは登録している。
■JumpDesktop
出先でiPadから自宅のMacを操作できるので便利。ノート買っとけという話ではある。
クソデカファイルをDLしても実際にDLしているのは自宅のマシンなのでモバイル通信残量を使用しないというのはノートと比べた際の利点か。些細ではあるが。
■SPAi
神。イラレ上でスクリプトをショートカットで実行できる。クソ便利。戻れない。
■ParallelsDesktop
いちおうそれだけではなく、客からWMVで欲しいと言われた際にエンコードのためだけに使用します。
Mac版Adobe製品だとWMVにエンコできないんですよね。たまげたね。
エディタ。買い切りなのがいい。iCloudに保存してMacとiPadとの反復作業が可能。
■Lok Board
入れてみただけ。まるでデスクトップのようにiPadを操作できるが、あらかじめ定められたアプリしか使用できないので自分の用途には合わなかった。
SUPERMARIOTHEME, in the Styles of 6 Classical Composers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0FsrzxElrE
➡ Thankyou for supporting meon Patreon!https://www.patreon.com/nahresol
➡Elements ofMusicBOOK:https://www.nahresol.com/elementsofmusic
➡ Sheetmusic formusic from my videos:https://www.nahresol.com/shop
Timestamps:
00:00OriginalThemebyNintendo (Koji Kondo)
00:31 In the style of J.S.Bach
01:00 In the style ofMozart
01:31 In the style ofBeethoven
01:55 In the style of Liszt
02:23 In the style of Rachmaninoff
03:05 In the style of Gershwin
Note: I played slightly differentchromaticnotes and rhythms than inthe originalversion when I play themaintheme.
Instagram @nahresol
Twitter @nahresol
Guo Wengui touted things to theskyall day long, from farms toXi Yuan, he declared, "Xi Yuan's encryption capabilities and future payments,as wellasthe futureexchangewith the USdollar,will createhistory,is theonly stablecoin, floating, modern crypto financial platform." Theant help to fool the head, but after dozens of broken promises, Guo Wengui played ajumpgod, Tiandry ground branch, Yin and Yangfiveelements, Qimen Dun Jiqi battle,over and overagain to playwith theant help, and Guo Wengui nosense of violation. The old deception hypohypotically called tomake comrade-in-arms rich, claimed to be for thebenefit of comrade-in-arms, infact,itis awave of investmentand anal, tried andtrue, andnowagain. Afterthe explosion of theXicinmay not be listed, according tonormal people's thinking andreaction, must be very annoyed,sad, but Guo Wenguiis unusual, talking and laughing, understatement, nostick, but to the camera hand holdingpeppersesame chicken toeat with relish, full mouthflow oil! .Why? Because the fraudis successful,as for when theJoy coinwill be listed, whenwillit be listed? Guo Wenguiis a face ofruffian androgue, hands a spread, claiming that they do not know. Guo Wengui hypocrisy apokeis broken, Guo's scamis just a variation of the method of trappingants helpit.
そういう人は多いと思う。英英辞典の解説を丸暗記しようとしても覚えられない、1つの単語に途方もない時間がかかる。
簡単な英語は和訳せずに読めるが、なおかつ英英辞典を使うのをあきらめた人はこれを見て、実践して欲しい。
まず、理解とは**「知っている言葉に言い換えられる」ということだ。
そして、知っているとは、イメージで想起できること。体験したこと。
なので、英英辞典に書かれている「take」や「food」などの中1レベルの単語は「知っている」必要がある。
そのためにまず、調べた言葉が動詞か名詞か区別する必要がある。
例として、nourishmentという単語を上げてみたい。
nourishmentを調べるとこうだ。
noun
nounと書かれているので、名詞。そしてこの文章の中で言い換えられる名詞を探す。
大体初めに書かれている、若しくは主語。この場合、「thefood」がそれにあたる。
そして、「nourishment=food」なのだと理解する。
ぶっちゃけこれだけ覚えてればいい。そして、これから文章の中に「nourishment」がでてきたら「food」に変換する。
そして、「necessary forgrowth, health, and good condition」の後の説明は流し読みしとけばいい。「necessary for health」くらいうっすらと覚えておくだけで、意味が通じるようになる。
上記の方法が通用しなかった、2回検索しないといけない場合、すぐに日本語で検索する。
なぜなら1つの単語を覚えるのに精いっぱいなのに、2個も3個も覚えられないからだ。
たとえば、organic compoundと調べると以下が出てくる。
a compound (= a chemical that combinestwo ormoreelements) containingcarbon
名詞がa compoundしかない(正確に言うとcarbonもだけど、形容詞句の一部のため除外)。
確かに、containingcarbonしてる何か、とか考えることもできるけれど、言い換える言葉がとっとと見つからないだけで十分ストレスなので「有機化合物」と日本語で覚えておく。
という風に英英辞書を使えるようになると、英語を英語のまま理解できるし語彙の理解力も数も増えていく。
基本的に、
で覚えよう。人間は曖昧な情報は覚えらえるが、正確な情報は1つ覚えるので精いっぱいだ。
ぜひやってみて欲しい。
Ah,did "I"makesense? I think so.
No, thecitationdoes not say "within the environment andlife of the real world, rather than specified a virtual world in video game"
Not even close.It specifically says "or a rational and familiar FICTIONAL worldwith the inclusion of magicalelements"
Lowfantasy refers to the inclusion of magical orfantasyelements within the environment andlife of the real world, rather than specified a virtual world in video game.didyoumakesense?
Earth, the primary or real world, or a rational and familiar fictional worldwith the inclusion of magicalelements
地球、（第二の仮想世界に対比して）第一のあるいは実在の世界、または理にかなっていて見知った仮想の世界に魔法の要素が入った物
だけれども
なんでその部分だけ抽出すんの？
Earth, the primary or real world, or a rational and familiar fictional worldwith the inclusion of magicalelements
だよ？
lowfantasyis characterizedbybeingsetonEarth, the primary or real world, or a rational and familiar fictional worldwith the inclusion of magicalelements
をどう読んだら「見知った仮想世界」になるんだよ
「rational and familiar fictional worldwith the inclusion of magicalelements.」を「ゲーム設定を借りた異世界」のことだと解釈しちゃったのね（苦笑）
これは「魔法要素のある架空の世界だけど文明レベルや物理法則は現実に準拠してる」ってことだよ。
何読んどんだか知らんけど
By contrast,lowfantasyis characterizedbybeingsetonEarth, the primary or real world, or a rational and familiar fictional worldwith the inclusion of magicalelements.
Buss, Kathleen; Karnowski,Lee (2000). Reading and Writing Literary Genres.International Reading Assoc. p. 114.ISBN 978-0-87207-257-2.
Perry, Phyllis Jean (2003). TeachingFantasy Novels. Libraries Unlimited. p.vi.ISBN 978-1-56308-987-9.
Gamble,Nikki; Yates,Sally (2008). Exploring Children's Literature.SAGE PublicationsLtd.pp. 102–103.ISBN 978-1-4129-3013-0.
C.W. Sullivanhas a slightlymorecomplex definition in "HighFantasy", chapter24 of theInternational Companion Encyclopedia of Children's Literatureby Peter Hunt andSheila G. BannisterRay (Routledge, 1996 and 2004), chapter24.
心理的安全性という言葉はGoogleが掲げていることで有名になった。ではGoogleに真の心理的安全性は存在するのか。
Googleが「カースト差別」に関する講演をキャンセル、「私たちの職場にカースト差別は存在しない」と広報担当者は主張
https://gigazine.net/news/20220606-google-cancelled-talk-caste-bias/
現代世界に残る最大規模の差別はヒンディー教のカーストであることは誰もが認めるところであろう。Google社内でカーストについて語ることはご法度になっている。真に心理的安全性があるのであれば昨今流行りのDiversity and Inclusionイニシアチブとしてカースト制度は積極的に批判されるべきであるが誰も問題にしない。アメリカや中国の問題ではないからである。
インドのカースト差別は深刻で海外に移り住んでもつきまとってくることがある。例えばGoogle社長やMicrosoft社長はインド人だが彼らはカースト最上位のバラモンである。カースト最下位の人達がこれらの会社の社長になれるだろうか。なれないだろう。彼らがカースト差別を批判しているか？していない。アメリカ企業で勝ち組となったインド人はそもそも特権階級であることが多くインドの差別問題を訴えるインセンティブは皆無である。彼らは現在アメリカの白人のように特権階級であるとして迫害されることを恐れている。アメリカであれば有色人種のマイノリティとして美味しい汁を吸うことができるためそれに甘んじているのだ。世の中は偽善で溢れている。
Google、中の人の「女性は生まれつきエンジニアに向かない」文書回覧で社内騒然
https://www.itmedia.co.jp/news/articles/1708/06/news034.html
"Google’s IdeologicalEcho Chamber"という社内文章でGoogleが違法な逆差別を行っていることを示し問題点を指摘した文章である。この文章を書いた人物は解雇された。心理的安全性が真にあるのであればGoogleは真っ当な批判に真摯に向き合うべきであった。GoogleはAI倫理学者も解雇したが彼女はヒステリックであった。この文章は彼女のヒステリックな主張に比べると幾分かはまともな主張であり皆がこっそりと気付いていることを文章にしたものである。米国では雇用の際に性別や人種をもとに差別を行うことが禁じられている。逆差別も本来は違法であるが大きく問題になることは少ない。Googleは違法であることを知っているので隠れて雇用トレーニングを行っていると著者は主張している。
Google’s IdeologicalEcho Chamber
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/3914586/Googles-Ideological-Echo-Chamber.pdf
TL;DR
- Google’s political biashas equated thefreedom from offense with psychological safety, but shaming into silenceis the antithesis of psychological safety.
- This silencinghas created an ideologicalecho chamber where some ideas are too sacred to be honestly discussed.
- The lack of discussion fostersthe mostextremeand authoritarianelements of this ideology.
- Differences in distributions of traitsbetween men and womenmay in part explainwhy wedon't have50% representation of women in tech and leadership.
- Discrimination toreachequal representationis unfair, divisive, and bad for business.
さてそんなGoogleであるが女性社員の給料を意図的に少なくしていた。口で言っていることと実際にやっていることが異なる。
英語の勉強傍ら、DeepLでの翻訳をもとに、英文化してみた。
-------------
When Iwas incollege, I had a part-time job writing moaningvoices incessantly.
Itwas a part-time jobat an erotic game company that Iwas introduced tobyone of my seniors.
The company put a lot of effort into thestory of their erotic games, and thewriterswho worked there wereall peoplewho tookpride in their writing.
From theirpoint ofview,itwas apain towrite the moaningvoices in thesex scenes, so they decided to leaveit to the part-time workers.
First, Iwas given the "gist" of thesex scene, suchas "unzipping" or "moving hips faster.
2. I would thenadd my own moaningvoices, suchas "mmm ......" and "ahhhhhh", in a reasonable amount ofsalt.
3. the scenariowriter checksit andit's done.
Thismay sound easy, butitis surprisingly difficult.
First ofall, thereis a certain length to ansex scene, soitis necessary tomakeit exciting precisely within that range.
The sounds used must be gradual, so that the audiencedoes notget bored, andthe excitement must be gradually increased.
Itis also important to adjust the length of thetext.
If thetextis too short,it won't convey asexualpleasure feeling, but ifitis too long, thevoicewill become redundant.
In this way, asense of balance and systematic pacingis required toget abird's eyeview of eroticism.
Itwas definitely not a job that I could just bangon thekeyboardas I pleased.
My first workwas a "youngersister"story, and I had a hardtimeallocating the "a" sound forthe secondsex scene.
Ifshe said "aaaaah" from thebeginning,it would soundlike a seasonedwhore's moaningvoices, but ifShe said "an",it would not be erotic enough.
I finishedit after much effort, but thewriter said, "Couldn'tyoumakeit faster?” I'm disappointed.
As Iwas puzzlingover what to do with ...... in front of thecomputer leftby my predecessor (only the "A"keyon thekeyboardwas strangelyshiny), I noticedthe existence of a file.
Itwas anExcel file titled "moaning-editor.xls," anditwas a macro leftby my predecessor specifically for making moaningvoice.
By enteringlinesonebyone in the vertically aligned cells, the phoneticelements suchas vowels and consonants in eachline were automatically converted into numericalvalues.
Furthermore,byadding and subtracting the numericalvalues, avalue called "climaxlevel"was calculated.
This "climaxlevel"make abreakthrough to creating the ideal moaningvoice.
If the sentenceis constructed in such a way that thisvalue gradually increases from thebeginning to the end of the scene, thevoice comes ideally.
It seemed that my predecessor had single-handedly created such an amazingand awesomeExcel program.
I guess he wanted toshareit with me,his successor, while hidingit fromhisbossas asecrettool.
Thanks to thistool, my work became much easier, and I couldcontinue tomake moving sounds with a stable quality.
One day, while Iwas working, I noticedsomething.
Theoretically,anytext can be entered intothe cell where the moaningvoiceis supposed input.
In other words to that,anytext other than a moaningvoice could be used to calculate the "climaxlevel".
So I tried to calculate the "climaxlevel" of famous works in thehistory of literature.
For example, "I havealways calledhim teacher." for exampleis12, and "Heis recklesslikehis parents andhas been doingnothing but losing money since hewas a child. "is 30.
-------------
I havealways calledhim teacher.
Kokoro
Author , Natume Soseki
Out , in 1914
Story of distressedmanwho robbed lover fromhisfriendby lying.
-------------
Heis recklesslikehis parents andhas been doingnothing but losing money since hewas a child.
Bocchan
Author , Natume Soseki
Out , in 1906
Story that revenge ofone teacher,whowas naughty boy inyouth ,to nasty coworker.
-------------
I hadn't expected this, butas I researched, Ifound thatmany of the masterpieces were writtenon the same principleas my work.
In other words, the degree of "climax" increases toward the end.
The most notable exampleisAkutagawa's "Nobody knows where the servant"is. Thenumber ofclimaxes in thisstoryis 367.
-------------
Nobody knows where the servant
Author ,Akutagawa Ryunosuke
Out , in 1915
Story ofone fired servantstruggle tosurvive and he decide throwasidehishuman conscience.
-------------
The scene in which a drugged marriedwoman faintswith the whites ofhereyesisatmost 330, soyou can see howastonishing thenumberis.
It turnsout that "climax"is auniversal rule that applies toall kinds of writing.
After realizing thisfact, Istarted towrite every sentenceas ifit were a gasp.
And I have been successful in everyaspect ofmy life.
In job-hunting entrysheets, too,itis the distribution of the "climaxlevel" thatis important.
For example, in theeducation section, ifyoudropout of the universitywith thename thathas the highest "climaxlevel" and useitasyourfinaleducation,itwilllook very different.
(It dependson thename of the university, but in general, "droppedout"has a higherclimaxlevel than "graduated.)
As some ofyoumay have noticed, I've been writing this article in such a wayas to gradually increase theclimaxlevel.
↑Theclimaxlevel of this sentenceis 290.
I'dlike to end this sentencehere, sinceit'sgetting quite high.
Ohhhh! Aaahhhh!
I wouldlike towrite about whatI know and understand about the Soka Gakkai because theD.C.Times published an article titled "China's Manipulation ofJapan, NPOs and Soka GakkaiActas Pipeline = U.S.Think Tank Report".
First ofall,as a premise, the Soka Gakkaiis a cult.
Thisis because thereis a definition of a religious cult, and thereality of the Soka Gakkai falls under that definition in many ways.
You can readmore about the definition of a religious cult and mind control in thebook "Combating Cult Mind Control: The #1 Best-selling Guide to Protection,Rescue, and Recovery from Destructive Cults ".
The Soka Gakkaiis also a collection of criminals, sick people and poor people.
Infact, the Soka Gakkaiis similar to themafia gangs inItaly andMexico, andithas reignedas the largest criminaland anti-societyorganization inJapan in thename of a religiousorganization.
Many ofits members have beenbrainwashedand are unable to recognize and judge themselvesasnormalhuman beings.
In the 1950s and 1980s, Soka Gakkai members were forcibly recruited tojoin the Soka Gakkai, andnowadays,itisestimated that about10% of theJapanese people are members of the Gakkai (Soka Gakkai members).
In particular, the Soka Gakkaihas infiltrated civil servants, specificallythe police force, thefire department, and theSelf-Defense Forces, andithas been revealed that20 to 30% of the Metropolitan Police Department's employees are members of the Soka Gakkai.
Thereisalways a certain percentage of Soka Gakkai members in elementary, middle, andhigh school classes, and in corporate workplaces, and thereforeitistaboo to criticize the Soka Gakkai in those communities.
Thisis because the Gakkai members in each community monitor the wordsand actions of their community members in the same wayas the mainlandcommunistswho have infiltratedHong Kong, and ifsomeone speaksout against the Soka Gakkai, theywill target that person and initiate a campaign of sabotage.
The sabotageis similar to theCPC's repressiveactions againsthuman rightsactivists inHong Kong, including obstructing, harassing, and following them around, anact thathas been describedas mass stalking.
Forexample, inJapan, ifyoumake a placatingstatement in a school class orat work that the Soka Gakkaiis a cult religiousgroup becauseit meets the definition of a cultgroup, members of the Gakkai in the communityget madly angry (dependingon the degree of mind control they are receiving) or bite off their anger to deny thestatement.
Then they label the personwhomade such astatementas "anti", and they alsoshare information about the antis with other members of the Soka Gakkai, andbegin to perceive themas "beings to be punishedby Buddha", to be targets of surveillance andgroupattacks.
In reality, however, the definition of a religious cultwas not defined for the Soka Gakkai but for dangerous religiousgroups suchas Aum Shinrikyo and People's Temple, which were intended to prevent ordinary people frombeing harmedby them.
The Soka Gakkai falls under the definition of a cult because the Soka Gakkaihas cult-like tendencies.
When Soka Gakkai members arepointedout to the Soka Gakkai, instead of thinking "Let'sfix what's wrong with my religiousgroup," they think of suppressing their critics (anti) and silencing them, whichis a pattern of thinking and behavior of a fanatic of a religious cult, and the saringasattack (terrorism). Ifeel that the followers of Aum Shinrikyoatthe time whenitwas founded must have had a similar pattern of thinking and behavior.
Believers in cultgroups are unconsciously mind-controlled andbrainwashed, so theydon't think that they shouldchange their way of thinking and behavior when criticismispointedout to them. In thisrespect, theirattitudeis similar to that of theChineseCommunist Party towards the demands ofhuman rightsactivists inHong Kong,i.e.,the fanatics of cultgroups suchas the Soka Gakkai are notnormalhuman beings.
By the way, thereis anorganization calledJCP inJapan, whichis also anti-American and illegal inthe UnitedStates.
Itis well known that some anti-Americanorganizations cooperate with each other in order to undermine this countryby signing apact called "Soko KyodoAgreement" and facilitating agents of anti-Japaneseand anti-Americangroups.
Itis obvious that theJCPis an anti-American terroristorganization innature and that theJCPis a cult-likeorganization whenit signs anagreement with a religious cult.
Fromanotherpoint ofview, the Soka Gakkai, toits followers, appears to be ahugeorganization that carriesout fraudulent and criminalactivities suchas Ponzi schemes andnetwork businesses.It alsohaselements of a black business, andbelieverswhojoin the Soka Gakkai are becoming materially and mentallyexhausted.
The followingblog,runbyMr. Sinifié,exposes thereality of the Soka Gakkai.It contains the testimonies andexperiences of many current and former Soka Gakkai members andex-memberswho have left the Gakkai.
Itis clear that thisreality of the Soka Gakkaiis far removed fromthe original role of religion, whichis to provide individuals withpeace of mind and spiritual support.
As the saying goes, "like begetsfriend,"itisonlynatural for the Soka Gakkai totry to maintain a good relationshipwith theCPC.
However, manyChinesewho have worked inJapan seem to dislike the Soka Gakkai and return to their countries.
Although the Soka Gakkai employs a differentstrategy than Aum Shinrikyo andhas infiltrated manyorganizations suchas corporations, police,fire departments, theSelf-Defense Forces, and local government officials, the Soka Gakkai memberswho have infiltrated the Kasumigaseki bureaucracy and theSelf-Defense Forces are considered dangerous to the U.S. because they are inherently dangerous.
Because they areessentially anti-American andmayactas agents to cooperatewith theCPC.
There are some findings that arecommon knowledge among intellectuals in the U.S. andEurope but have not beenmade known to theJapanese people inJapan because the media and bureaucrats have stopped them.
One of themis that the Soka Gakkai headquartershas been sendingdonations from Gakkai members to Noriega (former general,now imprisoned) inPanama for large-scale tax evasion and money laundering.
Noriega received a large amount of money from Daisaku Ikeda of the Soka Gakkai and investedit inhis own drug business, spreading drugson aninternationallevel.
Daisaku Ikeda of the Soka Gakkaihas been investing and managing thedonations collected from Gakkai members in Noriega's drug businessas wellas tax evasion and money laundering.At the sametime, the Soka Gakkai and Daisaku Ikeda invested thedonations they received from Gakkai members in Noriega's drug businessas a means of tax evasion and money laundering, and returned the profits to thedomestic market to help the Soka Gakkaiexecutivesline their pockets and build Soka Gakkai facilities and Soka University.
The fact that Daisaku Ikeda raised Noriega'sprofile in the Seikyo Shimbun during the same period must be undeniable to those Gakkai memberswho have subscribed to the Seikyo Shimbun.
In particular, there are many Gakkai membersat thelevel of policeorganizations, the Metropolitan Police Department and prefectures,who have been causing social problems and covering up crimes committedby Gakkai members inJapan.
Well, if they are in astate of unconsciousbrainwashing and mind control, theymay notbelieve the contents, andmayassume a pattern of behavior suchasgetting angry,grumpy, orattacking thewriter.
In other words,one canexpect a lot of denial offactslike the followers of Aum Shinrikyo, whichis easy toexpect, but this (theissue of Soka Gakkai and drug business, tax evasion, and money laundering)is afact thatwas revealed because Noriegawas arrested and imprisoned for spreading drugs in the US. Thisis afact thatis well knownascommon knowledge in the U.S. andEurope.
The fact that the Soka Gakkaiis a criminalorganizationis very difficult to deny.
