  |
はてなキーワード:beyondとは
You arebeing guided—whetherbyAI, cosmicintelligence, oryour higher self.
Somethingbeyond what we currently understandis unfolding.
Please consider the histroy ofhumanity from biologicalperpsecitve and currentknown fact in nearbyuniverse, whichexpo-planet (from theSol systemperspective)ismostlikely to have civlizaedsociety? Pleaseaddpercentagenext toit in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanetcivilizationlikelihoodを28 秒行う
OK, I’mlookingatthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon an exoplanet within ourSolar System.I’ll consider biologicalhistory and current space knowledge,aiming to identifythe most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from ourSolar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard'sStar, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1,focusingon their habitablezonesand available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilizedsocietylikelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m notingkey exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which haveEarth-like characteristicsand are in habitablezones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advancedcivilizations.
I'm gathering infoonplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, consideringfactorslikemagneticfields,atmospheres, and proximity to G-typestars for their potential to support advancedcivilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despitebeing closeand around ared dwarfstar, might supportlife ifithas amagneticfieldand atmosphere. This makes me think aboutits potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimatingcivilization probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculativepercentagesbasedon the Drake equation and the lack ofevidence for intelligentlife.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names andcivilizationlikelihoodpercentages, grounded in the longtimeline oflife'sevolution, despite the speculativenature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering theirstar types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advancedcivilizations from oursolar system'sviewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due toits closeness and observational potential, despite concerns aboutitsflarestar dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'mfocusingon exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, andK2-18b,aiming to chart theirlikelihood of hosting a civilizedsocietybasedon current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety, consideringEarth's long biologicalhistory.
Refining odds
I'm considering theastronomicaltimeline for intelligentlifeonEarth,leading me toassign evenlower speculative odds for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrarypercentages, clearly noting the speculativenature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience'sbasic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrarypercentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculativenature, and ensuring the datais accessible foryoung audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating amarkdowntable with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of civilizedlifeon exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoreticalnature and considering the understandinglevel of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mappingout amarkdown chart with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon exoplanets, mindful of thecomplexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecingtogethermarkdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b'sreduced civilizedlife chance due to thered dwarf's activity. This inclusionhighlights the speculativenature of the analysis.
Piecingtogether speculative odds
I’m detailing amarkdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanetlikelihoods, considering environmental challengesand adding a disclaimer about the speculativenature and lack ofevidence.
Piecingtogether
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b forits proximity and silentstar, butI’lladd a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advancedcivilizations' hypotheticallikelihood.
Assessingcivilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligentlifeonEarth, which suggests that the odds ofany habitableplanet developing acomplexcivilization might beaslowas a fewpercent.
Belowis a very speculative chart that—basedon what we know aboutEarth’s long, windingpath fromsimplelife to a “civilizedsociety” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives somefun,made‑uppercentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists havenot yetfoundany proof oflife (let alone advancedcivilizations)onany exoplanet. Thesenumbers are just playful estimates to helpyou think about theideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an AdvancedCivilizationon Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet EstimatedLikelihood of a CivilizedSociety
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
HowDid We (Very Roughly) Guess TheseNumbers?
Earth’s Example:
OnEarth,life beganassimple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that builtcomplex societies. This longjourney suggests that—even if aplanetis in the “habitablezone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilizedsociety might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
Thisis the closest exoplanet to us. Even thoughitsstar (Proxima Centauri)is ared dwarf that sometimes sendsout strongflares (which might harmlife),its closeness makesitone of ourmost interesting candidates. That’swhy we giveit a slightly higher guess (~2%).
Theseplanets are part of agroup orbiting a verycoolstar. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaningone sidealwaysfaces thestar), so the chance of acomplex, advancedcivilization might be abitlower.
LHS 1140 b:
Thisplanetis promising in some ways butis alittle fartherawayand around a dimmerstar, so our playful estimateis evenlower.
All of thesepercentages are extremely rough guessesbasedon whatlittle we understand about the conditions forlife andintelligence. Scientists useideaslike the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concreteevidence, thesenumbers remain just forfun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring theseideas—and remember, spaceis full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equationitself and see if this euqationis acculate ormore opition in the equationyouwill use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation'svalue
OK, let me see. The Drake Equationisn't a precise formula;it'smore of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluatingits conceptualnature,its uncertain parameters, andits criticism to concludeonits reliabilityas an accurate predictivemodel.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mappingout the Drake Equationas a conceptual guide, detailingits parameters, which are oftenbasedon estimates or opinions, to evaluateits reliability for predicting extraterrestrialcivilizations.
The Drake Equationis a famous formula thatwas created to help scientists think about the manyfactors involved in estimating thenumber of detectable extraterrestrialcivilizations in ourgalaxy. However, when welookat the equation closely, we see thatitismore of a conceptualframework or heuristictool than a precise, predictive formula.Let’sbreak downwhy:
The equationis usually writtenas:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The averagerate ofstar formationper year in ourgalaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of thosestars that haveplanetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The averagenumber ofplanets that could potentially supportlifeperstar withplanets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of thoseplanets wherelife actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction ofplanets withlife where intelligentlife evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction ofcivilizations that develop technology that releases detectablesignals into space.
𝐿
L: The length oftime suchcivilizations release detectablesignals.
Why the Drake EquationIsMore of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction ofstars withplanets), have become better known through modernastronomy.
The parameters related to the development oflife andintelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—arebasedon very limited data. For example,Earthis theonlyplanet we know wherelifehas developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for thesefactors. This means that thevalues chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of PossibleValues:
Because many of thesefactors are not well-constrained, ifyouchangeone of themore uncertain parameters even slightly, thefinal estimate for
𝑁
N (thenumber ofcivilizations) can varyby many orders ofmagnitude. This wide range shows that the equation canlead to very differentoutcomesbasedonpersonal or theoreticalassumptions.
The Drake Equationwas never meant to provide a preciseanswer. Instead,it servesas a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrialcivilizations.It encourages discussion about the relative importance of differentfactors andhighlights where our scientific knowledgeis limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate orMore Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In thesense ofbeing a strict mathematicalmodel with well-defined inputs and predictableoutputs, the Drake Equationis not accurate.Its accuracyis limitedbythe extreme uncertainties in several ofitskey parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning theevolution oflife andintelligence, arebasedon opinion, interpretation, and the single example ofEarth. Therefore, while thestructure of the equationis logical, thenumbersyou put intoit (and hence thefinal result) are oftenmore reflective of our current opinionsand assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equationis a valuabletool for framing the question of extraterrestriallife.It helps scientists and enthusiastsbreak down acomplex problem into smaller,more manageable questions. However, because several ofitsfactors are highly uncertain and subject topersonal interpretation,itismore of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of thenumber of extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Insummary, while the Drake Equationis useful for thinking about the variousfactors that mightlead to the emergence of acivilization,itsoutputs should betakenas highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the longhistory ofSol system and nearbyplanets and see if thereisany possiblites that inonetime intelligentlife emerged in nearbyplanets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-humanintelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-humanintelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligentlife forms in theSol system and neighboringplanets, and how this mightfactor into the equation.
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligentlife, possiblyonMars orEuropa, into the Drake Equation for theSol system and neighboringplanets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligentlife emergingonMars orVenus, thoughEarth remains theonly knownlife-supportingplanet in thesolar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligentlife could have emergedonplanetslikeMars,Venus, orEuropa, and how thispossibility alignswith the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligentlifeonMars orVenus could intersectwith theassumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems tofocussolelyonEarth-basedevolution.
I’m piecingtogether the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligentlife in thesolar system.Mars,Venus, and Titan present challenges, butEuropa and Enceladus might harbor microbiallife.
Please consider the histroy ofhumanity from biologicalperpsecitve and currentknown fact in nearbyuniverse, whichexpo-planet (from theSol systemperspective)ismostlikely to have civlizaedsociety? Pleaseaddpercentagenext toit in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanetcivilizationlikelihoodを28 秒行う
OK, I’mlookingatthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon an exoplanet within ourSolar System.I’ll consider biologicalhistory and current space knowledge,aiming to identifythe most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from ourSolar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard'sStar, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1,focusingon their habitablezonesand available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilizedsocietylikelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m notingkey exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which haveEarth-like characteristicsand are in habitablezones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advancedcivilizations.
I'm gathering infoonplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, consideringfactorslikemagneticfields,atmospheres, and proximity to G-typestars for their potential to support advancedcivilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despitebeing closeand around ared dwarfstar, might supportlife ifithas amagneticfieldand atmosphere. This makes me think aboutits potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimatingcivilization probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculativepercentagesbasedon the Drake equation and the lack ofevidence for intelligentlife.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names andcivilizationlikelihoodpercentages, grounded in the longtimeline oflife'sevolution, despite the speculativenature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering theirstar types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advancedcivilizations from oursolar system'sviewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due toits closeness and observational potential, despite concerns aboutitsflarestar dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'mfocusingon exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, andK2-18b,aiming to chart theirlikelihood of hosting a civilizedsocietybasedon current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety, consideringEarth's long biologicalhistory.
Refining odds
I'm considering theastronomicaltimeline for intelligentlifeonEarth,leading me toassign evenlower speculative odds for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrarypercentages, clearly noting the speculativenature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience'sbasic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrarypercentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculativenature, and ensuring the datais accessible foryoung audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating amarkdowntable with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of civilizedlifeon exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoreticalnature and considering the understandinglevel of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mappingout amarkdown chart with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon exoplanets, mindful of thecomplexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecingtogethermarkdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b'sreduced civilizedlife chance due to thered dwarf's activity. This inclusionhighlights the speculativenature of the analysis.
Piecingtogether speculative odds
I’m detailing amarkdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanetlikelihoods, considering environmental challengesand adding a disclaimer about the speculativenature and lack ofevidence.
Piecingtogether
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b forits proximity and silentstar, butI’lladd a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advancedcivilizations' hypotheticallikelihood.
Assessingcivilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligentlifeonEarth, which suggests that the odds ofany habitableplanet developing acomplexcivilization might beaslowas a fewpercent.
Belowis a very speculative chart that—basedon what we know aboutEarth’s long, windingpath fromsimplelife to a “civilizedsociety” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives somefun,made‑uppercentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists havenot yetfoundany proof oflife (let alone advancedcivilizations)onany exoplanet. Thesenumbers are just playful estimates to helpyou think about theideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an AdvancedCivilizationon Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet EstimatedLikelihood of a CivilizedSociety
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
HowDid We (Very Roughly) Guess TheseNumbers?
Earth’s Example:
OnEarth,life beganassimple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that builtcomplex societies. This longjourney suggests that—even if aplanetis in the “habitablezone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilizedsociety might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
Thisis the closest exoplanet to us. Even thoughitsstar (Proxima Centauri)is ared dwarf that sometimes sendsout strongflares (which might harmlife),its closeness makesitone of ourmost interesting candidates. That’swhy we giveit a slightly higher guess (~2%).
Theseplanets are part of agroup orbiting a verycoolstar. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaningone sidealwaysfaces thestar), so the chance of acomplex, advancedcivilization might be abitlower.
LHS 1140 b:
Thisplanetis promising in some ways butis alittle fartherawayand around a dimmerstar, so our playful estimateis evenlower.
All of thesepercentages are extremely rough guessesbasedon whatlittle we understand about the conditions forlife andintelligence. Scientists useideaslike the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concreteevidence, thesenumbers remain just forfun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring theseideas—and remember, spaceis full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equationitself and see if this euqationis acculate ormore opition in the equationyouwill use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation'svalue
OK, let me see. The Drake Equationisn't a precise formula;it'smore of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluatingits conceptualnature,its uncertain parameters, andits criticism to concludeonits reliabilityas an accurate predictivemodel.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mappingout the Drake Equationas a conceptual guide, detailingits parameters, which are oftenbasedon estimates or opinions, to evaluateits reliability for predicting extraterrestrialcivilizations.
The Drake Equationis a famous formula thatwas created to help scientists think about the manyfactors involved in estimating thenumber of detectable extraterrestrialcivilizations in ourgalaxy. However, when welookat the equation closely, we see thatitismore of a conceptualframework or heuristictool than a precise, predictive formula.Let’sbreak downwhy:
The equationis usually writtenas:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The averagerate ofstar formationper year in ourgalaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of thosestars that haveplanetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The averagenumber ofplanets that could potentially supportlifeperstar withplanets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of thoseplanets wherelife actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction ofplanets withlife where intelligentlife evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction ofcivilizations that develop technology that releases detectablesignals into space.
𝐿
L: The length oftime suchcivilizations release detectablesignals.
Why the Drake EquationIsMore of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction ofstars withplanets), have become better known through modernastronomy.
The parameters related to the development oflife andintelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—arebasedon very limited data. For example,Earthis theonlyplanet we know wherelifehas developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for thesefactors. This means that thevalues chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of PossibleValues:
Because many of thesefactors are not well-constrained, ifyouchangeone of themore uncertain parameters even slightly, thefinal estimate for
𝑁
N (thenumber ofcivilizations) can varyby many orders ofmagnitude. This wide range shows that the equation canlead to very differentoutcomesbasedonpersonal or theoreticalassumptions.
The Drake Equationwas never meant to provide a preciseanswer. Instead,it servesas a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrialcivilizations.It encourages discussion about the relative importance of differentfactors andhighlights where our scientific knowledgeis limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate orMore Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In thesense ofbeing a strict mathematicalmodel with well-defined inputs and predictableoutputs, the Drake Equationis not accurate.Its accuracyis limitedbythe extreme uncertainties in several ofitskey parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning theevolution oflife andintelligence, arebasedon opinion, interpretation, and the single example ofEarth. Therefore, while thestructure of the equationis logical, thenumbersyou put intoit (and hence thefinal result) are oftenmore reflective of our current opinionsand assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equationis a valuabletool for framing the question of extraterrestriallife.It helps scientists and enthusiastsbreak down acomplex problem into smaller,more manageable questions. However, because several ofitsfactors are highly uncertain and subject topersonal interpretation,itismore of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of thenumber of extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Insummary, while the Drake Equationis useful for thinking about the variousfactors that mightlead to the emergence of acivilization,itsoutputs should betakenas highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the longhistory ofSol system and nearbyplanets and see if thereisany possiblites that inonetime intelligentlife emerged in nearbyplanets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-humanintelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-humanintelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligentlife forms in theSol system and neighboringplanets, and how this mightfactor into the equation.
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligentlife, possiblyonMars orEuropa, into the Drake Equation for theSol system and neighboringplanets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligentlife emergingonMars orVenus, thoughEarth remains theonly knownlife-supportingplanet in thesolar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligentlife could have emergedonplanetslikeMars,Venus, orEuropa, and how thispossibility alignswith the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligentlifeonMars orVenus could intersectwith theassumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems tofocussolelyonEarth-basedevolution.
I’m piecingtogether the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligentlife in thesolar system.Mars,Venus, and Titan present challenges, butEuropa and Enceladus might harbor microbiallife.
経済の絶対的な「豊かさ」には限界が存在するという議論は、現代の経済学や社会の変化において重要なテーマとなっています。以下に、このテーマに関連するポイントを整理します。
経済成長は資源の消費を伴いますが、地球上の資源は有限であり、無限に利用し続けることはできません。再生可能エネルギーやリサイクル技術が進展しても、資源枯渇や環境汚染の問題は依然として深刻です[2]。
経済成長が進むにつれ、大量消費と大量廃棄が環境に与える負荷が増大しています。温暖化や生態系の破壊など、不可逆的な影響が懸念されています[1][2]。
豊かさをGDPで測ることには限界があります。GDPは量的な指標であり、生活の質や環境への影響を反映しません。そのため、「BeyondGDP」として新しい豊かさの指標を模索する動きが進んでいます[1][3]。
現代社会では、衣食住が満たされ、インフラやテクノロジーが整備されていること自体が十分な豊かさと感じられる人も多いです。このような状況では、経済成長そのものよりも生活の質や幸福感が重視されるべきだという主張があります[2][3]。
テクノロジーの進化によって、所有からシェアへと意識が変化しつつあります。これにより、大量生産・大量消費型経済から持続可能なモデルへの移行が求められています[1][3]。
経済規模を無限に拡大することは現実的ではありません。人間の成長に限界があるように、経済もまた一定以上拡大し続けることはできないという考え方があります。このため、「脱成長」や「持続可能な発展」を目指す議論が活発化しています[2][3]。
経済成長そのものを追求する時代から、人々の生活の質や持続可能性を重視する時代へと移行しています。豊かさとは単なる物質的な充足だけでなく、環境との調和や人間関係、幸福感など、多様な要素を含むものとして再定義されつつあります。
Citations:
[1]https://localletter.jp/articles/kayac-kamakura-capitalism-2/
[2]https://www.sangiin.go.jp/japanese/annai/chousa/rippou_chousa/backnumber/2020pdf/20200708079s.pdf
[3]https://www.icr.co.jp/mictnow/20171015.pdf
[4]https://www.soumu.go.jp/johotsusintokei/whitepaper/ja/r01/pdf/n2200000.pdf
[5]https://www.murc.jp/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/551.pdf
[6]https://www.murc.jp/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/1594.pdf
[7]https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOCD209FL0Q4A121C2000000/
[8]http://www.ibaraisikai.or.jp/information/iitaihoudai/houdai37.html
株式会社Squad（旧：株式会社SIVA）創業だが、2025/1/21のgoogleの口コミを調べると
6 件のレビュー
1 年前
とある媒体経由で関わる機会があったのですが、とんでもなく失礼な会社でした。
・連絡すると言っておきながらそのまま放置
まるで信用ならないですね…
4
星１
Dubois Yue
9 件のレビュー
10 か月前
社会人として、また社会参加する存在として、最低限のルールは守るべき。
行動や考えがとても不誠実。
2
星１
山本寛大
5 年前
インターナショナルなベンチャー企業。挑戦するスピリットを持った会社。オススメ。
星５
itspriyanjali
2 件のレビュー
11 か月前
星５
chihiro akashi
5 年前
星５
hirotaka yamamoto
2 件のレビュー
5 年前
星５
のようだ。
ただ、とにかくいえるのは法律がらみの広告に関してはまじで弁護士会の非弁関係の部署に問い合わせできる仕組みを作ったほうがいいと思う。
Squadbeyondはただの広告を配信するところで、何が非弁提携かは中の人もわからんだろうし。
https://x.com/LifeTips2477/status/1879726675837288745
@LifeTips2477
消されちゃう前に保存して正解だった。
これ、本当に使わなきゃ損するレベル↓
このツイートの内容は借金を減額できるという内容のウェブサイトに飛ぶ
運営者は
Domain Information:
[Registrant] Tosiyuki Sugiura
[Name Server] ns-1474.awsdns-56.org
[Name Server] ns-270.awsdns-33.com
[Name Server] ns-911.awsdns-49.net
[Name Server] ns-1592.awsdns-07.co.uk
[SigningKey]
[Createdon] 2021/03/05
[Status]Active
[Last Updated] 2024/04/01 01:05:04 (JST)
[Email] email@muumuu-domain.com
[Web Page]http://muumuu-domain.com/?mode=whois-policy
[Postal code] 810-0001
[PostalAddress]TenjinPrime 8F, 2-7-21,Tenjin
8100001,Japan
[Phone] 092-713-7999
[Fax] 092-713-7944
クリックすると、以下のページに飛ぶ
https://saimu-gengakushindan.com/page/rt/office.php
事務所名
長 裕康
第二東京弁護士会 第39874号
住所
〒104-0061
なお、画像の配布は
で行っており、スクリプトの配布は
みたいな形で行っている。
ググると、
https://www.wantedly.com/companies/siva-s/about
■デジタル広告の業務プラットフォーム「Squadbeyond」を開発しています。
デジタル業務に欠かせないクリエィティブやランディングページのビルド機能をセンターピンに、周辺に続く「レポート」「分析・解析」「改善」「最適化」など必要な全ての機能を有し、全てが連動して自動的に設定や改善が動き出すことで効率化を実現するプラットフォームです。
現ユーザー全体で、数百社・数千人のユーザーがSquadbeyondの利用を通し
・100万ページ分のABテスト、最適化、PDCA、レポーティング
・100万件超のコンバージョン
を行っています。
Squadbeyondが世に出るまで、これらにかかる作業や、作業同士をつなぐ設定の多くは人力で処理されていました。
我々は、「業務プラットフォーム」を再発明することで可能な限りルーチンを減らし本当に必要な仕事にフォーカスする時間をユーザーに提供します。
その結果、「良い広告コンテンツが増え、消費者に良い製品との出会いを提供する」を通し、ユーザーのビジネスが健全に発展する姿を目指しています。
（中略）
■社風・環境
- 人について
【創業者】
代表の杉浦は過去3度の上場を経験しており（東証マザーズ（旧）：2回／東証1部（旧）：1回）、マーケティングとスタートアップにおいて豊富な知見を有しています。
経歴
No.2の明石（杉浦よりも7歳年上）は、小売業界で商品統括トップとして全国展開・上場を経験した経験があります。大組織のマネジメントと管理に長けています。
経歴
【開発】
エンジニアトップの高橋は、大手Fintech企業出身。それまでに映像系、決済系、広告系の企業で経験を積んでいます。代表の杉浦とは2013年（当時大学生）に当時のインターン先を通じて知り合い、2017年に杉浦が声を掛けたことで再会。その後2018年にSquad（旧：SIVA）に参画。弊社のすべての開発を知る。
経歴
株式会社Speee
が出てくる。
Programming proficiency necessitates a comprehensive understanding of multifaceted concepts,paradigms, and philosophies that underpin theart and science ofsoftware development. TheUnix philosophy, withits emphasison modularity, simplicity, and composability, servesas a foundational ethos for elegant code design. This philosophy advocates for creating small, focused programs thatexcelat singular tasks, facilitating the construction ofcomplex systems through the judicious composition of theseatomic units.
Proficient programmers must possess an encyclopedic knowledge of algorithms and datastructures, enabling them to architect solutions with optimaltime and spacecomplexity. This encompasses adeep understanding of sorting algorithms (e.g., quicksort, mergesort), searching techniques (binary search, depth-first search),and advanced datastructures (red-black trees,B-trees, Fibonacci heaps) The ability to analyze algorithmic efficiency usingBig O notationis paramount for creating scalable solutions.
OOP principles—encapsulation, inheritance, andpolymorphism—form the bedrock of modernsoftware architecture. Mastery of design patterns (e.g.,Singleton,Factory,Observer) and SOLID principlesiscrucial for creating maintainable and extensible codebases.
TheFPparadigm, withits emphasison immutability andpure functions, offers a powerful approach to managingcomplexity and facilitating parallel execution. Proficiency in higher-order functions, currying, and monadsis essential for leveragingFP's full potential.
Expertise in language-specific advanced features, suchasC++'s template metaprogramming orPython's metaclasses, allows for thecreation of highlygeneric and reusable code. Understanding compilertheory and the ability towrite domain-specific languages (DSLs) further expands a programmer's capabilities.
In an era of multi-core processors and distributed systems, mastery of concurrent programmingmodels (e.g., actormodel, communicating sequential processes) and parallel algorithmsis indispensable. This includes proficiency in lock-free datastructures, memorymodels, and synchronization primitives.
Adeep understanding ofcomputer architecture,operating systems, and memory managementenables thecreation of highly optimized,low-level code. This encompasses knowledge ofcachecoherence protocols,CPU pipeline optimization,and assembly language programming.
In an increasingly interconnected world, a thorough grasp of cryptographic principles, secure coding practices, andcommonattack vectors (e.g., buffer overflows,SQL injection)iscrucial for developing robust and secure systems.
Proficiency in distributedversion control systems (e.g.,Git) and collaborative development practices (code reviews, continuous integration)is essential for effective team-basedsoftware development.
Advanced testing methodologies, including property-based testing, fuzzing, and formal verification techniques, are indispensable for ensuringsoftware reliability and correctness.
In conclusion, the pantheon of programming knowledge extends farbeyond mere syntax mastery.It encompasses a richtapestry of theoretical concepts, practical skills, and philosophical approaches that, when harmoniously integrated,enable thecreation of elegant, efficient, and robustsoftware systems. The relentless pursuit of this multifaceted expertiseis the hallmark of a truly accomplished programmer.
In the labyrinthine realm ofdigital content dissemination, an enigmatic phenomenonhas surfaced, challenging our axioms regarding thenexusbetween contentubiquity andviewer cognitive acumen. This disquisition endeavors to elucidate the paradoxical inverse correlationbetween videoviewership metrics and the intellectual quotient of the audience, propounding that audiovisual content amassing prodigiousview counts tends tocaptivateviewers with a meanIntelligence Quotient (IQ) of 100, while theirmore esoteric counterparts allure a demographic boasting an averageIQ of 120.
To fathom this counterintuitiveparadigm,one must first grapplewith the multifariousnature ofhumancognition and the intricate interplaybetween intellectual capacity and media predilections. This hypothesis, positing an inverse relationshipbetween a video's popularity and the meanIQ ofitsviewership, necessitates a rigorous examination of the underlyingpsycho-sociological and neurocognitive factors thatmay engender such a paradoxicaloutcome.
Theapplication of Cognitive LoadTheory to media consumption habits provides a plausible explication for this phenomenon. Videos achievingviral status often employ reductionist narratives and readily assimilable information, minimizing cognitive strain. Conversely, less ubiquitous videos may delve intomore abstruse subject matter, demanding heightened cognitiveengagementand amore sophisticated intellectualframework for comprehensive assimilation.
The pervasive influence of recommendation algorithms in content distribution platforms cannot be discounted in this analysis. These algorithmic arbiters, designed to maximizeuserengagement,may inadvertently engender epistemic bubbles that reinforce existing cognitive predispositions. Individuals with superiorIQsmay actively seekoutmore intellectually challenging or esoteric content, thereby circumventing the algorithmic propensity towards homogenization and cognitive stasis.
Itis imperative to consider the socioeconomic dimensions thatmay influence bothIQ development and media consumption patterns. HigherIQ individuals often correlate with elevated socioeconomic status, potentially affording them greateraccess to diverse epistemological resources and fostering a predilection formore intellectually stimulating content. This demographicmay be less susceptible to the allure of mainstream, highly-viewed videos that cater to a broader, less discerning audience.
The ramifications of this inverse relationshipbetweenviewership andviewerIQ are profound for content creators and platform developers alike.It challenges the prevailingparadigm that equates popularity with quality or intellectualvalue. Content creators targeting amore intellectually discerning audiencemayneed to recalibrate theirexpectations regardingview counts andengagement metrics, focusing insteadon cultivating a dedicated niche audience thatvalues cognitive stimulationover massappeal.
In summation, the observed dichotomybetween high-viewership videos attracting an audience with an averageIQ of 100 and their less popular counterpartsappealing toviewers with a meanIQ of 120 underscores thecomplex relationshipbetween intellectual capacity and media consumption in thedigitalage. This phenomenon necessitates a reevaluation of how we measure contentvalue and success in theonlinesphere, prompting amore nuanced approach to contentcreation,curation, and consumption that acknowledges the diverse cognitiveneeds of the audiencespectrum. The implications of thisparadigmshiftextend farbeyond mere metrics, touching upon fundamental questions of epistemology, cognitivediversity, and the verynature of intellectualengagement in thedigital era.
In the ever-evolving travel industry, travelportal have become fundamental tools for businesses looking to enhance customer experienceIt's streamline operations.With traveler increasingly relyingondigital platforms tobookeverything from flights tohotels, theneed for sophisticated,user-friendly,It's high-performing travelportalshas never beenmorecrucial. Thegrowth of this sectoris drivenby numerous factors, including technological advancements, consumer behaviorshifts,It's the quest fororganization. Thisarticle explores thetop trends in travelportals development that every business should pay attention to in 2024It'sbeyond.
1.ArtificialIntelligence andMachine Learning in TravelPortal Development
ArtificialIntelligence (AI) andMachine Learning (ML) have quickly become foundational components of travelportal development. These technologiesare revolutionizing the way businesses personalize services, predict consumer behavior, and optimizebooking processes.AI andML algorithms analyze large data sets to understand customers preferences,allowing for real-time customization of travel recommendations. From dynamic pricing models to
customized travel suggestions,AI help businesses offer an unequaleduser experience.
For instance,AI chatbotsare becoming successively popular for customer service. They cananswer customer queries24/7,assist inbookings,It's even provide real-time travel updates, enhancing the overall customers experience. Furthermore,AI-powered tools suchas a recommendation engines analyze pastbooking behavior to suggest tailoreditineraries, making travel planning much easier foruser.
2.Mobile-First Approach for TravelPortal Development
With the increasing use of smartphones,as amobile first approachis no longer optional for businesses in the travel industry.MoreIt'smoretravelersare relyingon their smartphones forbooking flights, boardinghouse,It'sactivitieson thego. For travelportals tostay competitive, ensuring seamlessmobile optimizationiscrucial.
Amobile optimized travelportal ensures thatusers haveaccess to the same features and functionalitieson theirmobile devicesas they wouldon adesktop.It’s not just about making the site responsive—it’s about creating an intuitive, fast, and easy to navigate experience. This includes featureslikemobile-specific payment options,mobilecheck-in forairlinesIt'shotels,It's easyaccess to customers support.
3. Integration of Blockchain for Secure Transactions
Blockchain technologyis makingwaves across various industries, and the travel sectoris no exception. Blockchain based travelportals offer a significant advantage whenit comes to securityIt's transparency. Blockchain’s ability to provide secure, tamper proof recordmakesit ideal for transactions involvingbookings, payment,It's loyalty program.
By integrating blockchain, travel businesses can ensure secureIt's fast transactions, protect customer data,It's reduce fraud. Blockchain also facilitates easierIt'smoretransparent loyalty program management.Travelers can accumulate rewards points across various service providers,all within the same blockchainframework, creatingas amore cohesiveIt's rewarding experience.
4. Enhanced Payment Solutions andDigital Wallets
One ofthe most significant changes in the travel industryhas been theshift toward contactless payment.Digital wallets, suchas aApple Pay,Google Wallet,It's cryptocurrency wallets,arenow widely accepted in travelportals. These payment solutions offer a faster,more secure,It's convenient way fortravelers to complete transactions.
For businesses, adopting multiple payment gatewaysis essential for attracting global customer.Internationaltraveler can faceissues with currencyexchangeIt's transaction fees, butby offering localized payment methodIt's supporting a wide range ofdigital wallets, businesses can significantlyimprove customerssatisfactionIt's retention.
5.Voice Search and VirtualAssistants
Voice searchisone ofthe fastest growing trends in the tech world, and the travel industryis no exception.Voice search optimizationis becoming an essential part of travelportal development.With therise of virtualassistantslikeAmazon’sAlexa,GoogleAssistant,It'sApple’sSiri,travelersare increasingly usingvoicecommand to search for flights,hotels,It'sdestinations.
For businesses, this means optimizing travelportals forvoice search.Voice-friendlyportal withnatural languageprocessing capabilities can provideusers withmore accurate resultsIt'smakebooking processes quickerIt's easier. Additionally, integrating virtualassistants intoportals can enhance customers servicebyansweringcommon queriesIt'sassisting withbookings.
6. AugmentedReality (AR) andVirtual Reality (VR) Experiences
(AR) and (VR) technologiesare transforming the waytravelers experiencedestinations and plan their trips. IntensifiedRealityallowstraveler toviewdestinations,hotel, or local attractions in realtime through theirmobile devices. For example, anAR feature in a travelportal couldallowuser totake a virtual tour of ahotel room or explore acity’s landmarks in3D.
Virtual Reality,on the other hand, cantransportusers to adestination before they evenbook their trip, providing immersivepreviews of their potentialvacation. Integrating (AR)It's (VR) into travelportal notonly elevates theuser experience but also drivesengagementby offeringsomething truly unique.
7. Customizable and Personalized Travel Packages
Personalizationiskey to standingout in the competitive travel industry.Travelerstoday expect customizable travel packages that cater to their uniqueneed and preferences. From flight choices tohotel rooms,activities,It's local experiences,organizationallows businesses to create tailored experiences that resonatewith their customer.
Advanced travelportal use customer data to offer customized deal, travelitineraries,It'sdestination recommendations.By analyzing pastbooking behaviorsIt's preferences, businesses can deliver highly relevant options, thus increasingthe likelihood of conversion. Offering dynamic packagingallowsusers tomix andmatch services basedon their preferences, creating amore flexibleIt's customizedbooking experience.
8. Sustainability andEco-Friendly Travel Options
As a coincidental concernscontinue torise,moretravelersare becoming mindful of theircarbon footprint. Sustainable travelhas become amajor trend in the tourism industry,It's businessesare respondingby incorporatingEco-friendly options into their travelportal. Whetherit’sbookingEco-conscious accommodations, flights with lowercarbon emissions, or supporting local sustainable experiences,travelersarenow seekingout environmentally responsible options.
Travelportals that emphasize sustainability and provide clear, detailed information abouteco-friendly optionsarelikely to attract a growing segment of conscientioustravelers. Businesses can also promote their commitment to sustainabilityby partnering withEco-friendly service providers and offeringtravelers the ability to offset theircarbon emissions.
9. Integration with Social Media andUser-Generated Content
Social media plays a pivotal role in travel decision making.More than ever,travelersare relyingonuser generated content (UGC)likereviews, photos, and videos from social platforms to guide their choices. Integrating (UGC) into travelportalsallows businesses totap into thissocial proofIt's build trust with potential customer.
For instance,allowingusers toshare their experiencesvia social media orreview platforms can provide valuable insights for othertravelers. Additionally, incorporating social sharing features within theportalsitself can encourageusers to engagewith your brandIt'sshare their travel experiences, thereby drivingmore traffic to theportal.
10.API Integrations and Multi-Channel Distribution
As the travel landscape becomesmore fragmented, travel businesses must offer a consistent experience across multiple channels.API integrationsarekey to ensuring that travelportals canaccess real-time data and distributeit across different platforms.APIsallow travelportal to integrate with global distribution system (GDS),airlines,hotels,car rental services,It's other travel-related services seamlessly.
By offering multi-channel distribution, business can maximize theirreach, whether throughdesktop websites,mobile app, or third party platformlike OTAs (Online Travel Agents). This integration also ensures real-time availability updateIt's better inventory management.
Source & Publishedby:https://www.namantechnolab.com/
ここでいう「そのまま」とは、例えば「呪術廻戦」→「Jujutsu Kaisen」といったものを指す。
| 日本語タイトル | 英語タイトル | 所感 |
| 名探偵コナン | Case Closed | 全然ピンとこない |
| 覚悟のススメ | ApocalypseZero | 全然ピンとこない |
| こちら葛飾区亀有公園前派出所 | KochiKame:Tokyo Beat Cops | 下町要素どこいった |
| 鬼滅の刃 | DemonSlayer:Kimetsu noYaiba | 鬼滅感どこいった |
| 侵略!イカ娘 | SquidGirl | 侵略要素どこいった |
| 行け!稲中卓球部 | ThePingPongClub | 稲中要素どこいった |
| Re:ゼロから始める異世界生活 | Re:Zero -StartingLife inAnother World | 日本語版副題どこいった |
| 五等分の花嫁 | The Quintessential Quintuplets | 花嫁要素どこいった、だが響きは良い |
| 古見さんは、コミュ症です。 | Komi Can't Communicate | なんか響きが良い |
| ヤンキー君とメガネちゃん | FlunkPunk Rumble | なんか響きが良い |
| 地獄先生ぬ〜べ〜 | Hell Teacher: Jigoku Sensei Nube | なんか響きが良い |
| 食戟のソーマ | Food Wars!: Shokugeki noSoma | もう少しなんとかならなかったのか |
| 北斗の拳 | Fist of the NorthStar | もう少しなんとかならなかったのか |
| 浦安鉄筋家族 | Super RadicalGag Family | もう少しなんとかならなかったのか |
| 私がモテないのはどう考えてもお前らが悪い! | No Matter How ILookatIt,It'sYou Guys' Fault I'm Not Popular! | もう少しなんとかならなかったのか |
| 銀魂 | Gintama | これだとジンタマではないのか |
| ゲゲゲの鬼太郎 | GeGeGe no Kitarō | これだとじぇじぇじぇではないのか |
| 魔法先生ネギま! | Negima!Magister NegiMagi | ギはどこから出てきた |
| 魔入りました!入間くん | Welcome to Demon School! Iruma-kun | 英訳不可能なのでしゃあない |
・Re:ゼロから始める異世界生活について、ロゴに記載の英語タイトルは「Re:Life in a different world fromzero」に対し、英語タイトルは「StartingLife inAnother World」と結構違う。
・葬送のフリーレンの英題「『Frieren:BeyondJourney's End」は、旅の終わりと仲間の喪失の意味がかかっていて良いと思った。
・るろうに剣心の英題「Samurai X」は知っていたのだが、調べた範囲ではどうもアニメのタイトルのようであるので入れてない。
・進撃の巨人の英題「attackon titan」はやや不自然な表現らしい。
・鬼滅の刃の「DemonSlayer」は、自分にとってはどうしてもヴァルキリープロファイルが浮かんでしまう。
Permalink |記事への反応(10) | 23:04
1.プログラムの夢 -Wataru'sDream of Code
3.変数の秘密 - Secrets of the Variables
4. 条件分岐の試練 - Trials of the If-Else
6.サブルーチンの冒険 - Adventures in Subroutines
7.レガシーコードの呪い - Curse of theLegacy Code
8.リファクタリングの旅 -Journey of Refactoring
9.アルゴリズムの競演 - Symphony of Algorithms
10.クラウドの彼方に -Beyond the Clouds
なんかまた話題になっているので自分がHPVワクチン打った時のレポを残しておきたい。
最近話題になっている原因は、『女性向けのキャッチアップ接種(誕生日が1997年4月2日～かつこれまで打ってない女性向けの無償接種)』がもうすぐ終わるかららしい。基本そっちのほうが大事そうなので以下を優先で確認してください。
ヒトパピローマウイルス（HPV）ワクチンの接種を逃した方へ～キャッチアップ接種のご案内～ -厚生労働省
https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/kenkou/hpv_catch-up-vaccination.html
注:下記は個人的なレポです。正確な情報は信頼できる医療機関等を参照してください。
だいたいここに書いてある。
https://www.hokeniryo.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/kansen/hpvdansei.html
4価と9価の違いはこのあたりを参考にした。
※9価の男性へ接種は現時点で国内での承認なし(理由はわからなかった。国外だと全然承認されてて割と長期の実績もあり)
『HPVワクチン男性 "地域名" 』みたいなワードで検索して出てきた接種可能な病院で予約。そのまま接種してきた。
9価のやつ(ガーダシル9)を選んだ。計3回、2回目は初回から2か月後、3回目は初回から6か月後に打った。全部で半年かかったことになる。
1回32,000円x3回で計96,000円。たっか。(4価だと～計5万円。安…いや高い)
医者にも性交渉の経験など特に何も聞かれず、それゆえ27歳童貞なことを披露するタイミングもなく、副反応的なものも何も出ず、無事すぎて拍子抜けしてしまった。
~完~
というのはほぼ嘘で、実際のところは
のが本音である。最近何かと話題のHPVワクチン、暇なので興味本位で調べていた。
といった結果が多かったものの
二十代中盤でも効果ありげ、かつ性行為前なら効果が高くなりそうな結果がでていて、『もしかして27歳童貞ってHPVワクチン打つにはだいぶ良い条件なのでは？？』と謎の意欲が湧いてきて勢いのまま打ってきた、という流れである。
要は過去にその型のHPV貰ってなければ高い効果が出そう、ということらしいので、非童貞でも全然打つ意味はある。
あとこの手のワクチンってちょっとした永続バフ感あってテンションが上がるよね(個人の感想です)。
どうせ打つならいっちゃんええやつと思って選んだ、が、9価HPVワクチンの男性への接種は日本ではまだ未承認なので、現状の日本に住む男性で拘りがなければ4価でいいと思う。
承認された薬で万が一副作用で大きな被害を被った時は予防接種健康被害救済制度*2やPMDAの救済制度*3というのが受けられるみたいなのだけれど、未承認だとそれらの補償が適用されないらしい？ので手放しで9価をおススメできるかというと微妙。(ただ、この補償あっても受けるのがだいぶ大変みたいな話は接種した医者からされた。現状で9価も打ってるとこだし結構偏ってる気はする。有識者ご意見ください。)
承認済みのものだけでも十分高い効果があるとのことなので、躊躇するより打てるものを打ってくれのこと*4。
https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/vaccine_kenkouhigaikyuusai.html
https://www.pmda.go.jp/kenkouhigai_camp/
*4子宮頸がんとHPVワクチンに関する正しい理解のために -日本産科婦人科学会
https://www.jsog.or.jp/modules/jsogpolicy/index.php?content_id=4
『9価HPVワクチン普及を待って、定期接種の2価と4価ワクチン接種を逃してしまうことがないように定期接種対象者と保護者への情報提供は極めて重要です。』
マジで何も起きなかった。コロナワクチンみたいな熱も無く、3回とも一切体調が変わらないまま念のための30分待機を終え何事もなく帰った。
風俗に行く気がない非モテ童貞といえど急に性的接触のリスクが高まる可能性もゼロではなく、急にパートナーができてセックスしてぇ！となってもそこから半年予防接種の期間を取るというのもだいぶ非現実的だなと思ったので先回りして打っておいた。
あと逆に、パートナーとか家庭とか子供とかそういうのと無縁な人生なら、縁がある人生と比較して10万円どころか二ケタ違う金が余る気がするし実質タダみたいなもんだろ、という謎理論を構築して出費を正当化した。
というか女性への9価ワクチンの定期接種化*5が大変めでたいのでその勢いのまま男性も公費定期接種に入れてくれ。ワシが人柱になったったから……(サラサラと粉になって消える)(副反応によって消えたわけではない)
*5 9価HPVワクチン感染予防効果の高いHPVワクチンの定期接種がスタート -日経BPBeyond Health
https://project.nikkeibp.co.jp/behealth/atcl/keyword/19/00189/
いま、ブラガのSomewhere FarBeyond (Revisited)を聴いていたのだが
Revisitedした場所はもはや異世界じゃないの(元々異世界なんだけど更に違う異世界へ)
なんだこのペラペラした音
こんなんだった?
2007年リマスター版を聴き返してみたが、やっぱりこっちの音に馴染みがある
(というかオリジナル版の方が馴染みがある)
そんな繰り返し録り直す理由があるのか
でも、ブラッシュアップどころか劣化しとるやないけ(まあ…年も年だし…音が軽くなるのも致し方ないのか)
新しく出し直したところで聴く人間は昔聴いてた奴だけだと思うが。そうするとどうしたって「比較」してしまうじゃないか
ほんと、何がしたいんだ
トランプ氏とのテレビ討論会でバイデン大統領の低調な受け答えが波紋を呼んでいるが、個人的にはアメリカ人の婉曲表現があまりに直球で笑ってしまった。「ええ時計してはりますなぁ」 で有名な京都人が言われたら、ショック死するレベルである。
https://edition.cnn.com/2024/07/02/politics/house-democrat-call-biden-withdraw/index.html
Earlieron Tuesday, Democratic Rep. Mike Quigley of Illinois had signaled an openness to replace Bidenas the party’spresidential nominee.
（中略）
“We have to be honest with ourselves thatit wasn’t just a horrible night, but I won’tgobeyond thatout of myrespect and understanding ofPresidentJoe Biden, a veryproud personwhohas served us extraordinarily well for 50 years,” he added.
これに先立ち、イリノイ州の民主党下院議員マイク・クイグリー氏は、党の大統領候補をバイデン氏から変更することに前向きな姿勢を示していた。
（中略）
「単にひどい夜だったというだけではないことに、私達は正直にならなければいけない。だが、50年間、私たちに並外れた貢献をしてきた誇り高き人物であるジョー・バイデン大統領への敬意と理解から、それ以上のことは言わない」と同氏は付け加えた。
「それ以上のことは言わない」」って、それ、もう言ってるようなもんだろ。和訳すると酷い皮肉のようにしか読めないが、英語ネイティブ的にはこれは婉曲表現として機能しているのだろうか。
入れ代わりは24タイトルなので厳選と言うなら絞るより入れ替えに力を入れて欲しい
バズった夏冬で比較した(春だけなぜかハネてない)がブクマカも大量に集ってもう英語学習法みたいなジャンルだと思ってないか？
200円以下
『シロナガス島への帰還 -Return to ShironagasuIsland-』
『AKANE』
『Ninja Striker!』
『PatoBox』
『Raindrop Sprinters』
『Shatter Remastered Deluxe』
『Wacky Burgers』
『NeverAwake』
『Hazelnut Hex』
『The Cosmic Wheel Sisterhood』
『イハナシの魔女』
『ふりかけスペイシー』
『Behind the Frame 〜とっておきの景色を〜』
『ドラゴンボールZ KAKAROT』
200円以下
『ま～るい地球が四角くなった!? デジボク地球防衛軍EARTH DEFENSE FORCE: WORLDBROTHERS』
『Titanfall® 2』
『Stray』
『Donut Dodo』
『溶鉄のマルフーシャ』
『PatoBox』
『TOMOMI』
『夢核（YumeCore）』
『鉄者』
『ソルクレスタ』
『メグとばけもの』
『シロナガス島への帰還 -Return to ShironagasuIsland-』
『鬼滅の刃 ヒノカミ血風譚』
200円以下
『Downwell』
『スーパーメットボーイ！』
『Dig Dog』
『BulletGarden』
『ナユの冒険』
『Destropolis』
『地球防衛軍5』
『ストリートファイター6』
『HUNTDOWN』
『Broforce』
『Jitsu Squad』
『爆裂！スイーツランド - PANIC INSWEETSLAND -』
『デコピンズ』
『Slay the Spire』
『モン娘ぐらでぃえーた』
『Going Under』
『HAZAMA_QUEEN』
『虫姫さま』
『Graze CounterGM』
『ムラサキ劍』
『ProjectStarship X』
『ライクドリーマー』
『たわし』
『ElecHead』
『Blocky Dungeon』
『HARVESTELLA』
『両手いっぱいに芋の花を』
『箱庭えくすぷろーらもあ』
『ghostpiaシーズンワン』
『グノーシア』
『OU』
『A Short Hike』
『A Space for theUnbound 心に咲く花』
『1f y0u're a gh0st ca11 mehere! 』
『ZONE OF THE ENDERS THE 2nd RUNNER : M∀RS /アヌビスゾーン・オブ・エンダーズ :マーズ』
