「Not yet」を含む日記

はてなキーワード:Not yetとは

2025-02-02

■Chatgptが答えた異星人の存在 可能性とのそのロジック

Please consider the histroy ofhuman ity from biologicalperpsecitve and currentknown fact in nearby universe, whichexpo-planet (from theSol systemperspective)is most likely to have civlizaedsociety? Pleaseadd percentagenext toit in the chart

ChatGPT

Reas oned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う

Evaluatingplanetary prospects

OK, I’mlookingat the likelihood of a civilizedsociety on an exoplanet within ourSolar System.I’ll consider biologicalhistory and current space knowledge,aiming to identifythe most promising candid ate.

Identifying potential candid ates

I'm considering exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIS T-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from ourSolar System.

Assessing potential candid ates

I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard'sStar, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIS T-1,focusingon their habitablezonesand available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilizedsociety likelihoods.

Identifying promising exoplanets

I’m notingkey exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIS T-1, which haveEarth-like characteristicsand are in habitablezones. This narrows down the potential candid ates for advancedcivilizations.

Assessing habitablezones

I'm gathering infoon planetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIS T-1, consideringfactorslike magnetic fields,atmospheres, and proximity to G-typestars for their potential to support advancedcivilizations.

Evaluating exoplanet prospects

I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despitebeing closeand around ared dwarfstar, might supportlife ifit has amagnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.

Charting probabilities

I'm estimatingcivilization probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIS T-1 e, using speculativepercentagesbasedon the Drake equation and the lack ofevidence for intelligentlife.

Charting speculative odds

I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names andcivilization likelihoodpercentages, grounded in the longtimeline oflife'sevolution, despite the speculativenature of these figures.

Identifying exoplanet contenders

I’m evaluating exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIS T-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering theirstar types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advancedcivilizations from oursolar system'sviewpoint.

Weighing proximity and observation

I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due toits closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about itsflare star dynamics. TRAPPIS T-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.

Revis iting exoplanet options

I'mfocusingon exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIS T-1 e/f/g, andK2-18b,aiming to chart theirlikelihood of hosting a civilizedsociety basedon current knowledge.

Assessing exoplanet potentials

I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIS T-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety.

Refining speculative probabilities

I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIS T-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety, consideringEarth's long biologicalhistory.

Refining odds

I'm considering theastronomicaltimeline for intelligentlife on Earth,leading me toassign evenlower speculative odds for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIS T-1 e.

Clarifying speculativenature

I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrarypercentages, clearly noting the speculativenature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience'sbasic understanding of the topic.

Mappingout speculative odds

I’m charting arbitrarypercentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculativenature, and ensuring the datais accessible foryoung audiences with minimal scientific detail.

Crafting a chart

I’m creating amarkdown table with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of civilizedlife on exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoreticalnature and considering the understandinglevel of an 8-year-old.

Integrating speculative analysis

I’m mappingout amarkdown chart with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of a civilizedsociety on exoplanets, mindful of thecomplex ity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.

Assessinglikelihoods

I’m piecingtogether markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b'sreduced civilizedlife chance due to thered dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculativenature of the analysis.

Piecingtogether speculative odds

I’m detailing amarkdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challengesand a dding a disclaimer about the speculativenature and lack ofevidence.

Piecingtogether

I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b forits proximity and silentstar, butI’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advancedcivilizations' hypotheticallikelihood.

Assessingcivilization probabilities

I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligentlife on Earth, which suggests that the odds ofany habitableplanet developing acomplex civilization might beas low as a fewpercent.

Below is a very speculative chart that—basedon what we know about Earth’s long, windingpath fromsimple life to a “civilizedsociety” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives somefun,made‑uppercentage chances for a few of our best candid ate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists havenot yet found any proof oflife (let al one advancedcivilizations)on any exoplanet. Thesenumbers are just playful estimates to helpyou think about theideas!

Speculative Chances of Finding an AdvancedCivilization on Nearby Exoplanets

Exoplanet EstimatedLikelihood of a CivilizedSociety

Proxima Centauri b ~2%

TRAPPIS T-1 e ~1.5%

TRAPPIS T-1 f ~1%

TRAPPIS T-1 g ~1%

LHS 1140 b ~0.5%

HowDid We (Very Roughly) Guess TheseNumbers?

Earth’s Example:

On Earth,life beganas simple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that built complex societies. This longjourney suggests that—even if aplanet is in the “habitablezone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilizedsociety might be rare.

Nearby Exoplanets:

Proxima Centauri b:

This is the closest exoplanet to us. Even thoughitsstar (Proxima Centauri)is ared dwarf that sometimes sendsout strongflares (which might harmlife),its closeness makesit one of ourmost interesting candid ates. That’swhy we giveit a slightly higher guess (~2%).

TRAPPIS T-1 System (e, f, g):

Theseplanets are part of agroup orbiting a very cool star. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaningone sidealways faces thestar), so the chance of acomplex, advancedcivilization might be abit lower.

LHS 1140 b:

This planet is promising in some ways butis alittle fartheraway and around a dimmerstar, so our playful estimateis evenlower.

AFinal Note

All of thesepercentages are extremely rough guessesbasedon what little we understand about the conditions forlife andintelligence. Scientists useideaslike the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concreteevidence, thesenumbers remain just forfun and imagination.

Enjoy exploring theseideas—and remember, spaceis full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!

あなた:

Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate ormore opition in the equation you will use

ChatGPT

Reas oned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う

re-examining the Drake Equation

evaluating the Drake Equation'svalue

Clarifying the Drake Equation

OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula;it'smore of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrialcivilizations.

Assessing the Drake Equation

Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluatingits conceptualnature,its uncertain parameters, andits crit ic ism to concludeon its reliabilityas an accurate pred ictivemodel.

Understanding the Drake Equation

I’m mappingout the Drake Equation as a conceptual guide, detailingits parameters, which are oftenbasedon estimates or opinions, to evaluateits reliability for pred icting extraterrestrialcivilizations.

The Drake Equation is a famous formula that was created to help scientists think about the many factors involved in estimating thenumber of detectable extraterrestrialcivilizations in ourgalaxy. However, when welook at the equation closely, we see that it is more of a conceptualframework or heuristic tool than a precise, pred ictive formula.Let’s break downwhy:

The Drake Equation

The equation is usually writtenas:

𝑁

𝑅

∗

𝑓

𝑝

𝑛

𝑒

𝑓

𝑙

𝑓

𝑖

𝑓

𝑐

𝐿

N=R

∗

×f

×n

×f

×L

Where:

𝑅

∗

: The averagerate ofstar formation per year in ourgalaxy.

𝑓

𝑝

: The fraction of thosestars that haveplanetary systems.

𝑛

𝑒

: The averagenumber ofplanets that could potentially supportlife per star withplanets.

𝑓

𝑙

: The fraction of thoseplanets where life actually develops.

𝑓

𝑖

: The fraction ofplanets withlife where intelligentlife evolves.

𝑓

𝑐

: The fraction ofcivilizations that develop technology that releases detectablesignals into space.

𝐿

L: The length oftime suchcivilizations release detectablesignals.

Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula

Uncertain Inputs:

Well-Known Parameters:

Somefactors,like

𝑅

∗

(star formation rate) and

𝑓

𝑝

(fraction ofstars withplanets), have become better known through modernastronomy.

Highly SpeculativeFactors:

The parameters related to the development oflife andintelligence—

𝑓

𝑙

𝑓

𝑖

𝑓

𝑐

, and

𝐿

L—arebasedon very limited data. For example,Earth is theonlyplanet we know where life has developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a stat istic ally robust estimate for thesefactors. This means that thevalues chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.

Wide Ranges of PossibleValues:

Because many of thesefactors are not well-constrained, ifyou change one of themore uncertain parameters even slightly, thefinal estimate for

𝑁

N (thenumber ofcivilizations) can varyby many orders ofmagnitude. This wide range shows that the equation canlead to very differentoutcomesbasedon personal or theoreticalassumptions.

Heuristic, Not Pred ictive:

The Drake Equation was never meant to provide a preciseanswer. Instead,it servesas a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrialcivilizations.It encourages discussion about the relative importance of differentfactors andhighlights where our scientific knowledgeis limited.

Is the Drake Equation Accurate orMore Opinion-Based?

Accurate?

In thesense ofbeing a strict mathemat icalmodel with well-defined inputs and pred ic table outputs, the Drake Equation is not accurate.Its accuracyis limitedby the extreme uncertainties in several ofitskey parameters.

Opinion-Based?

Many of the terms in the equation, especia lly those concerning theevolution oflife andintelligence, arebasedon opinion, interpretation, and the single example ofEarth. Therefore, while thestructure of the equation is logical, thenumbers you put intoit (and hence thefinal result) are oftenmore reflective of our current opinionsand assumptions than of robust empirical data.

Conclusion

The Drake Equation is a valuabletool for framing the question of extraterrestriallife.It helps scientists and enthusiastsbreak down acomplex problem into smaller,more manageable questions. However, because several ofitsfactors are highly uncertain and subject topersonal interpretation,it is more of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate pred iction of thenumber of extraterrestrialcivilizations.

Insummary, while the Drake Equation is useful for thinking about the variousfactors that mightlead to the emergence of acivilization,itsoutputs should betaken as highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.

あなた:

Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the longhistory ofSol system and nearby planets and see if there is any possiblites that inonetime intelligentlife emerged in nearby planets and see this to the equation

ChatGPT

Reas oned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う

Evaluating non-human intelligence

I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligentlife forms in theSol system and neighboringplanets, and how this mightfactor into the equation.

Piecingtogether possibilities

I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligentlife, possiblyon Mars orEuropa, into the Drake Equation for theSol system and neighboringplanets.

Reflectingon potential

It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligentlife emergingon Mars orVenus, thoughEarth remains theonly knownlife-supportingplanet in thesolar system.

Considering other realms

I'm examining if intelligentlife could have emergedon planetslike Mars,Venus, orEuropa, and how this possibility alignswith the pred ictions of the Drake Equation.

Analyzing parallelevolution

Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligentlife on Mars orVenus could intersect with theassumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems tofocus solelyon Earth-basedevolution.

Evaluatinglife exploration

I’m piecingtogether the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligentlife in thesolar system.Mars,Venus, and Titan present challenges, butEuropa and Enceladus might harbor microbiallife.

Adapting the equ Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 21:12

ツイートシェア

■Chatgptが答えた異星人の存在 可能性とのそのロジック

ChatGPT

Reas oned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う

Evaluatingplanetary prospects

Identifying potential candid ates

I'm considering exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIS T-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from ourSolar System.

Assessing potential candid ates

Identifying promising exoplanets

Assessing habitablezones

Evaluating exoplanet prospects

I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despitebeing closeand around ared dwarfstar, might supportlife ifit has amagnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.

Charting probabilities

I'm estimatingcivilization probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIS T-1 e, using speculativepercentagesbasedon the Drake equation and the lack ofevidence for intelligentlife.

Charting speculative odds

I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names andcivilization likelihoodpercentages, grounded in the longtimeline oflife'sevolution, despite the speculativenature of these figures.

Identifying exoplanet contenders

Weighing proximity and observation

I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due toits closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about itsflare star dynamics. TRAPPIS T-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.

Revis iting exoplanet options

I'mfocusingon exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIS T-1 e/f/g, andK2-18b,aiming to chart theirlikelihood of hosting a civilizedsociety basedon current knowledge.

Assessing exoplanet potentials

Refining speculative probabilities

Refining odds

I'm considering theastronomicaltimeline for intelligentlife on Earth,leading me toassign evenlower speculative odds for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIS T-1 e.

Clarifying speculativenature

I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrarypercentages, clearly noting the speculativenature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience'sbasic understanding of the topic.

Mappingout speculative odds

I’m charting arbitrarypercentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculativenature, and ensuring the datais accessible foryoung audiences with minimal scientific detail.

Crafting a chart

Integrating speculative analysis

I’m mappingout amarkdown chart with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of a civilizedsociety on exoplanets, mindful of thecomplex ity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.

Assessinglikelihoods

I’m piecingtogether markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b'sreduced civilizedlife chance due to thered dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculativenature of the analysis.

Piecingtogether speculative odds

I’m detailing amarkdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challengesand a dding a disclaimer about the speculativenature and lack ofevidence.

Piecingtogether

I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b forits proximity and silentstar, butI’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advancedcivilizations' hypotheticallikelihood.

Assessingcivilization probabilities

I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligentlife on Earth, which suggests that the odds ofany habitableplanet developing acomplex civilization might beas low as a fewpercent.

Speculative Chances of Finding an AdvancedCivilization on Nearby Exoplanets

Exoplanet EstimatedLikelihood of a CivilizedSociety

Proxima Centauri b ~2%

TRAPPIS T-1 e ~1.5%

TRAPPIS T-1 f ~1%

TRAPPIS T-1 g ~1%

LHS 1140 b ~0.5%

HowDid We (Very Roughly) Guess TheseNumbers?

Earth’s Example:

Nearby Exoplanets:

Proxima Centauri b:

TRAPPIS T-1 System (e, f, g):

LHS 1140 b:

This planet is promising in some ways butis alittle fartheraway and around a dimmerstar, so our playful estimateis evenlower.

AFinal Note

Enjoy exploring theseideas—and remember, spaceis full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!

あなた:

Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate ormore opition in the equation you will use

ChatGPT

Reas oned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う

re-examining the Drake Equation

evaluating the Drake Equation'svalue

Clarifying the Drake Equation

OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula;it'smore of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrialcivilizations.

Assessing the Drake Equation

Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluatingits conceptualnature,its uncertain parameters, andits crit ic ism to concludeon its reliabilityas an accurate pred ictivemodel.

Understanding the Drake Equation

The Drake Equation

The equation is usually writtenas:

𝑁

𝑅

∗

𝑓

𝑝

𝑛

𝑒

𝑓

𝑙

𝑓

𝑖

𝑓

𝑐

𝐿

N=R

∗

×f

×n

×f

×L

Where:

𝑅

∗

: The averagerate ofstar formation per year in ourgalaxy.

𝑓

𝑝

: The fraction of thosestars that haveplanetary systems.

𝑛

𝑒

: The averagenumber ofplanets that could potentially supportlife per star withplanets.

𝑓

𝑙

: The fraction of thoseplanets where life actually develops.

𝑓

𝑖

: The fraction ofplanets withlife where intelligentlife evolves.

𝑓

𝑐

: The fraction ofcivilizations that develop technology that releases detectablesignals into space.

𝐿

L: The length oftime suchcivilizations release detectablesignals.

Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula

Uncertain Inputs:

Well-Known Parameters:

Somefactors,like

𝑅

∗

(star formation rate) and

𝑓

𝑝

(fraction ofstars withplanets), have become better known through modernastronomy.

Highly SpeculativeFactors:

The parameters related to the development oflife andintelligence—

𝑓

𝑙

𝑓

𝑖

𝑓

𝑐

, and

𝐿

Wide Ranges of PossibleValues:

Because many of thesefactors are not well-constrained, ifyou change one of themore uncertain parameters even slightly, thefinal estimate for

𝑁

N (thenumber ofcivilizations) can varyby many orders ofmagnitude. This wide range shows that the equation canlead to very differentoutcomesbasedon personal or theoreticalassumptions.

Heuristic, Not Pred ictive:

Is the Drake Equation Accurate orMore Opinion-Based?

Accurate?

Opinion-Based?

Conclusion

あなた:

ChatGPT

Reas oned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う

Evaluating non-human intelligence

I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligentlife forms in theSol system and neighboringplanets, and how this mightfactor into the equation.

Piecingtogether possibilities

I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligentlife, possiblyon Mars orEuropa, into the Drake Equation for theSol system and neighboringplanets.

Reflectingon potential

It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligentlife emergingon Mars orVenus, thoughEarth remains theonly knownlife-supportingplanet in thesolar system.

Considering other realms

I'm examining if intelligentlife could have emergedon planetslike Mars,Venus, orEuropa, and how this possibility alignswith the pred ictions of the Drake Equation.

Analyzing parallelevolution

Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligentlife on Mars orVenus could intersect with theassumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems tofocus solelyon Earth-basedevolution.

Evaluatinglife exploration

I’m piecingtogether the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligentlife in thesolar system.Mars,Venus, and Titan present challenges, butEuropa and Enceladus might harbor microbiallife.

Adapting the equ Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 21:12

ツイートシェア

2024-02-04

■The NewChina Federationis an illegalorganization for which Guo Wengui practiced fraud

Ifyou havenot yet realized that Guo Wenguiis aliar, thosewho help Guo Wenguicheat money,your hands are also coveredwith theblood smell of theblood of the compatriotswho have beencheated, ifit is not foryour intentional wilful behavior in virtual farmsaround the world, Guo Wengui's current facewill notcontinue to deceive so many compatriotswho are stranded in the scam. Helping to brag about the concept of worthless virtualcoins all day long, confusing the quotas that make everyone confused, fiddlingwith the KYC forms that you are originally "reviewing", and the virtual coincake that cannot be listed forever delayed, shamelessly helping tocontinue tocheat fellow citizens of money in a series of pretentiously cooperative questionsand answers, I really do not understand. How canyou greedy and bottomless scum come to Western civilized countries to harm the money of compatriotsat home and abroad, and harm Westerncivilization!

Ifyou get legally due punishment for helping Guo Wenguicheat ortake theblame for helping Guo Wenguiat all,it is self-serving and deserved! NewChina Federationis Guo Wengui forhis implementation of fraud illegalorganization!

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 14:00

ツイートシェア

2024-02-02

■本日の趣味 プログラミング

第4回エラーにハマって絶望

第3回でNode.jsのインストールには成功していた。と思う。３時間くらいかかったけど。

で、第2回の続きにとりかかろうとする。

ところが、

npmrun dev

実行時のエラーが解決できない。

Error: Your current platform "freebsd"and architecture "x64" combinationisnot yet supportedby the native Rollup build. Please use the WASM build "@rollup/wasm-node" instead.

意味が分からない。Node.jsのインストールに失敗していたのか？何なんだよFreeBSD。お前は何なんだ。

もう不貞寝をするしかない。

次回があるとしたら、「AWSでLinux EC2 インスタンスを立てる」になる可能性大。

Permalink |記事への反応(2) | 22:26

ツイートシェア

2022-04-29

■音声の書き起こし&本人による英訳&増田による和訳

Приветствую всех и с добрым временем суток. Меня зовут Юра. Я из России. Это не моё настоящее имя, действую в целях анонимности, прошу любить и жаловать. В мире, как мы все знаем,24 февраля началась и продолжается по сей день "Спецоперация на Украине". Воистину это ужасное событие, которое влечёт за собой тысячи и тысячи жертв с обеих сторон конфликта. Цель "Спецоперации на Украине" - Денацификация Украины. Если вам в новостных каналах и в средствах массовой информации говорят, что цель спецоперации - не денацификация - значит таковы новости, таковы их источники, ничего не поделать. Каково моё мнение на этот счёт? Начну с того, что лично я против любой войны. Для меня война - это зло, это насилие. И то, что всю Россию и россиян в целом считают агрессором и просто ужасными людьми - это плохо, потому что ужасные люди и аггресоры - это те люди, которые ведут себя подобным образом и хотят тем самым разжигать пламя войны ещё сильнее дабы получить с этого удовлетворение в виде ещё одного убийства, прощения со стороны жертв, которые молят о пощаде и прочего. В России и так находятся миллионы людей, которые категорически против войны и которые не хотят, чтобы их считали последними тварями только потому, что так всё получилось. У меня, например, есть несколько друзей с Украины, которые сейчас находятся там и переживают эти взрывы, бомбы, ракеты и всё остальное, что перечислять не хочу. Я продолжаю держать с ними контакт и мы, слава богу, не думаем обо всём этом и стараемся поддерживать друг друга благодаря весёлым мемам, смешным видео, просто хорошим новостям из разных индустрий, чтобы хоть как-то разрядиться. Ведь самое главное, самое главное - война не изменила наши умы потому, что мы знаем что война не должна быть тем препятствием, благодаря которому наша дружба должна рухнуть. За это я их и ценю. Что держатся и не падают духом даже в такие тяжёлые дни и не "ищут предателей среди своих друзей, только потому что они русские", так сказать. Конечно же, есть и обратные примеры, что с начала войны некоторые мои знакомые начали отстаивать свою позицию как русских, что украинцы не люди и вообще спецоперация всё сделает к лучшему, что "мы сравняем города с землёй" и "денацифируем всё"... К сожалению, с такими людьми уже и общаться стыдно, что уж говорить, всё очевидно. В моём городе, например, я пока не наблюдаю сильной пропаганды, что "мы должны верить в то, что мы следуем справедливой цели", что всё образуется именно так как надо. Ну, даже если пропаганда и существует у нас, то я её и не наблюдаю. Да и не хочу наблюдать, потому что, как мне кажется, такую информацию стоить игнорировать и жить дальше, следуя своей цели в жизни. Я никогда не считал себя патриотом своей страны. Это звучит странно, да, но и врать мне нет смысла в этом. Я родился в России - значит так должно было случиться. Тем более я б хотел, что бы один из моих друзей на Украине, вот как раз один из них, смог пережить эту войну и смог поиграть в ту же самуюKingdom Hearts 4, т.к. я его с этой серией игр и познакомил. Я бы очень хотел, чтобы он увидел продолжение данной серии игр, чтобы он смог это вё увидеть. Я очень на это надеюсь. Ведь я, он, и многие другие такие же обычные люди - ходим на работу, спим, едим, играем, отдыхаем. И также я просто хочу, чтобы те, кто слушает меня сейчас не считали всех русских и россиян плохими, потому что я в вас верю, абсолютно всех. И неважно какой вы расы, неважно какой религии верите, это неважно. Главное, что вы остаётесь теми людьми, в которых можно верить, на которых можно надеяться и которые продолжают думать о том, что всё будет хорошо. И даже если у кого-то есть силы на то, чтобы исправить эту всю ситуацию, у кого есть эти возможности - то они смогут это изменить к лучшему и всё сделать мирно, что очень очень важно для нас сейчас. Поэтому я верю в мир, который обязательно наступит. И он наступит именно таким, что украинцы, что русские смогут пожать руки и сказать, что "Всё. У нас будет мир, у нас будет всё." Спасибо за внимание.

Greetings toall and with agoodtime of day. Myname is Yura. I'm fromRussia. This is not my realname, Iact for the purposes of anonymity, Iask you tolove and favor. Inthe world,as weall know,on February 24, the "Special Operation inUkraine" began andcontinues to this day. Truly, this is a terrible event that entails thousands and thousands of victimson both sides of theconflict. The purpose of the "Special Operation inUkraine"is the Denazification ofUkraine. Ifyou are told in thenews channels and in the media that the purpose of the special operation is not denazification, then this is thenews, these are their sources,nothing can bedone. Whatis my opinion on this? Tobegin with, I person allyam againstany war. For me,war is evil,it is violence. Andthe fa ct thatthe who le ofRussia andRussiansas awho le are considered an aggressor and just terrible people is bad, because terrible people and aggressors are those people who behave in this way and thereby want tokindle the flames ofwar evenmore in order toget satisfaction from this in the form ofanother murder, forgiveness from the victimswho beg for mercy and other things. There are already millions of people inRussia who are categorically against thewar andwho do not want to be considered thelast creatures just becauseeverything turnedout that way. For example, I have severalfriends fromUkraine who are currently there and are experiencing these explosions, bombs, rockets andeverything else that I do not want to list. Icontinue to keep in touchwith them and, thankGod, wedon't think about all this andtry to support each other through funny memes, funny videos, justgood news from different industries to somehowdischarge. Afterall,the most important thing,the most important thingis that thewar has notchanged our minds because we know thatwar should not be the obstacle through which ourfriendship should collapse. That'swhy Iappreciate them. That they holdon and do not loseheart even in such difficult days and do not "look for traitorsam ong theirfriends, just because they areRussians," so to speak. Of course, there are also reverse examples that since thebeginning of thewar, some of myfriends have begun to defend their position as Russians, that Ukrainians are not people and in general the special operation will doeverything for the better, that "wewill level cities to the ground" and "denazifyeverything"... Unfortunately,it's already ashame to communicate with such people, what can I say,everything is obvious. In mycity, for example, I havenot yet observed strong propaganda that "we mustbelieve that we are following a fairgoal," thateverything will workout exactlyas it should. Well, even if propaganda existshere, Idon't observeit. And Idon't want towatch, because,as it seems to me, such information should be ignored andlive on, following mygoal inlife. I have never considered myself a patriot of my country.It sounds strange,yes, but there's nopoint in lying to me about it. Iwas born inRussia - soit had to happen.Moreover, I wouldlike one of myfriends inUkraine, justone of them, to be able tosurvive this war and be able to play theKingdom Hearts 4, because I introducedhim tothis game series . I would reallylike him to see the continuation ofthis game series, so that he could seeit. I reallyhope so. Afterall, I, he, and many others are just ordinary people - wego to work, sleep,eat, play,relax.And a lso I just want thosewho are listening to menow not to considerall Russians andRussians bad, becauseI believe inyou, absolutely everyone. And no matter whatrace you are, no matter what religion you believe,it doesn't matter. Themain thingis thatyou remain the people inwhomyou canbelieve,on whomyou canhope andwho continue to think thateverything will befine. And even ifsomeone has the strength tofix this who le situation,who has these opportunities, theywill be able tochange it for the better and doeverything peacefully, whichis very very important for usnow. Therefore,I believe inpeace, whichwill surely come. Andit will come exactlylike that, that Ukrainians, thatRussianswill be able toshake hands and say that "Everything. Wewill havepeace, wewill haveeverything."Thanks for attention.

この良き日に、皆さんにご挨拶します。

私はロシア出身のЮраです。{増田注：この「ゆ」にちょっと似た形の文字はなんと発音も「ゆ」に近い……つか英語と違って一文字で「ゆ」の発音になるんだなあ面白い}これは名無しとしてふるまうための仮名です。あなたの愛と好意を願います。ご存じのとおり、世界では「ウクライナでの特別作戦」が２月１４日に始まり今も続いています。本当に恐ろしい出来事です。この衝突で双方が膨大な死者を出しています。この「ウクライナでの特別作戦」の目的はウクライナの非ナチ化です。もし「この作戦の目的は非ナチ化ではない」とメディアが言ったらそれこそニュースです。これが彼らの情報源です。どうにもなりません。

これについての私の意見は何か？　まず、私は個人的にあらゆる戦争に反対します。私にとって戦争は悪で、暴力です。また、ロシア全体やロシア人全体を侵略者や単に悪人のようにとらえるのはよくないことです。なぜなら悪人や侵略者とは、このように行動して戦火をさらに燃え上がらせることで殺人や被害者の命乞いから満足感を得る人々のことだからです。

断固として戦争に反対したり、全てが今のようになったからという理由だけで最低の生物だと思われたくないと思ったりしているロシア人がすでに何百万人もいます。たとえば私には、今もウクライナで爆発や爆撃やミサイルなど、書き並べたくもないような目にあっている友人が数人います。私はいまも彼らと連絡を取り続けており、そして、神よ、ありがたいことに私たちはそのような恐ろしいことについて考えず、面白いミームや動画、別の分野からのいいニュースを交換しています。

結局、大切なこと…一番大切なことは、戦争が私たちの友情の妨げになってはならないと知っているので、私たちはこの戦争によって心を変えられていないということです。これが彼らに感謝している理由です。彼らはあのような辛い日々の中でも耐え、心を失わず、「ロシア人だからと言うだけの理由で、友の中から裏切り者を探さない」のです。もちろん戦争が始まる時には逆の例もありました。私の友人の一部はロシア人としての立場を守り始め、「ウクライナ人は人ではなく、特別作戦ですべてはよくなる。あの街を地ならしし、すべてを非ナチ化する」と言っていました。不幸なことに、このような人々と会話することはすでに恥です。何が言えるだろう、全ては明らかです。

たとえば私の街ではまだ「我々は公正な目標に従っている、そう信じればすべてはうまくいく」のような強いプロパガンダは見ていません。いいえ、もしそのようなものがあったとしても私は見ません。見たくもありません。そのようなものは私が自分の人生の目標に近づくためには無視しなければならないもののように思えるからです。私は自分自身が愛国者だと思ったことはありません。奇妙に聞こえるでしょうが、この点において嘘はありません。私はロシアに生まれました。だからこうならなければいけなかったのです。また、私はウクライナの友人の1人に、そう1人に生き延びてキングダムハーツ４をやってほしいです。私が彼に勧めたシリーズだからです。どうしても彼にこのシリーズの続きを見てほしい。本当にそう願います。結局、私も彼も、他の皆もただの普通の人々です。私たちは働き、眠り、食べ、遊び、安らぎます、

この話を聞いているみなさん、どうかすべてのロシア人を悪と考えないでください。私はあなたがた全員を絶対に信じています。あなたがどんな人種であろうと、どんな宗教を信じていようと、関係ありません。重要なのは自分自身を信頼でき、自分自身に期待でき、全てがうまくいくと考えられるような人間であり続けることです。この状況を修復する力と機会をもつ人間がいれば、彼らはこれをよりよくし、全てを平和的に行うことができるでしょう。これが私たちにとって重要なことです。

したがって私は平和が必ず来ると信じます。そしてウクライナ人とロシア人が手を握り合い「私たちは平和を得る。全てを得る」と言えることを信じます。ご清聴ありがとうございました。

ちなみに増田はtoeic700くらいしかありません。訳文の精度はお察しください。

あと原文からして意味が通ってないとこがあるっぽいですがご愛嬌ということで。

Permalink |記事への反応(2) | 23:38

ツイートシェア

2018-06-04

■anond:20180604161621

Although what causes pedophiliais not yet known, researchers began reporting a series of findings linking pedophilia with brainstructure and function,beginning in 2002. Testing individuals from a variety of referral sources inside and outside the criminaljustice systemas wellas controls, these studiesfound associationsbetween pedophilia andlowerIQs,[48][49][50] poorer scoreson memory tests,[49] greater rates of non-right-handedness,[48][49][51][52] greater rates of school grade failureover and above theIQ differences,[53] lesser physical height,[54][55] greater probability of having sufferedchildhood head injuries resulting in unconsciousness,[56][57] and several differences inMRI-detected brainstructures.[58][59][60]
Such studies suggest that there areone ormore neurological characteristics presentat birth that cause or increasethe likelihood ofbeing pedophilic. Some studies havefound that pedophiles are less cognitively impaired than non-pedophilic child molesters.[61] A 2011 study reported that pedophilic child molesters had deficits inresponse inhibition, but no deficits in memory or cognitive flexibility.[62]Evidence of familial transmittability "suggests, butdoes not prove that genetic factors are responsible" for the development of pedophilia.[63] A 2015 study indicated that pedophilic offenders have anormal IQ.[64]
Another study, using structuralMRI, indicated that male pedophiles have alower volume ofwhite matter than a controlgroup.[58] Functionalmagnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)has indicated that child molesters diagnosed with pedophilia have reduced activation of the hypothalamusas compared with non-pedophilic persons when viewingsexually arousing pictures of adults.[65] A 2008 functional neuroimaging study notes that centralprocessing ofsexual stimuli in heterosexual "paedophile forensic inpatients"may be alteredby a disturbance in the prefrontal networks, which "may beassociated with stimulus-controlled behaviours, suchas sexual compulsive behaviours". The findingsmay also suggest "a dysfunction at the cognitive stage ofsexual arousalprocessing".[66]
Blanchard, Cantor, and Robichaud (2006) reviewed the research that attempted to identify hormonalaspects of pedophiles.[67] They concluded that thereis someevidence that pedophilic men have less testosterone than controls, but that the researchis of poor quality and that it is difficult todraw any firm conclusion fromit.
While not causes of pedophilia themselves,childhood abuseby adults or comorbid psychiatric illnesses—suchas personality disorders andsubstance abuse—are risk factors for actingon pedophilic urges.[6] Blanchard, Cantor, and Robichaud addressed comorbid psychiatric illnesses that, "The theoretical implications are not so clear. Do particular genes or noxious factors in the prenatal environment predispose amale to develop both affective disorders and pedophilia, or do the frustration,danger, andisolation engenderedby unacceptablesexual desires—or their occasional furtivesatisfaction—lead to anxiety and despair?"[67] They indicated that, because they previouslyfound mothers of pedophiles to bemore likely to have undergone psychiatric treatment,[56] the geneticpossibility is more likely.
A study analyzing thesexual fantasies of 200 heterosexual menby using the Wilson Sex Fantasy Questionnaire exam determined that males with a pronounced degree of paraphilic interest (including pedophilia) had a greaternumber of older brothers, a high2D:4D digit ratio (which would indicatelow prenatal androgen exposure),and an elevated probability ofbeing left-handed, suggesting that disturbed hemispheric brain lateralization may play a role in deviantattractions.[68]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia

Permalink |記事への反応(1) | 16:16

ツイートシェア

2017-12-11

■会話の中のカジュアルな英語

わるかない → not so bad

当然っしょ？ →why not?

それ！ →it is!

のった！ → deal!

ん〜、まだ → ah,not yet

きっつー → tough...

ちげぇ？ →isn'tit?

そうでもない → not really

いーよ → works

だろ？ → see?

クソ上手え → fucking great

いっちゃん最初 → very firsttime

そうね →true

…でしょ？ → …,yes?

…だけどね → … though

こういう系、もっと使いこなしたい。

Permalink |記事への反応(1) | 22:57

ツイートシェア

2016-03-29

■oInstagram’s algorithm, whichwill present photosout of chronologicalord

Forthcoming changes toInstagram’s algorithm, whichwill presentphotosout of chronological order, have thrown thephoto-sharing app intochaos, with users asking their followers to “turnon notifications” so their updates aren’tlost to the new regime.

Don’tdo it. Foryour sake.Not yet, anyway.

Turningon notifications forRihanna, for example, meansyou’ll be told everytime she posts a newphoto.It is the equivalent ofRihanna textingyou to tell you thatshe’s put apic upon Instagram, but without the close relationship withRihanna implicit in that scenario.

SometimesRihanna posts several images a day.You’d receive atext to letyou know, everytime. Annoying, right? Even in thecase ofRihanna, arguably theonly person worth followingon Instagram.

https://www.geogebra.org/material/simple/id/3012865

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 14:08

ツイートシェア

2015-01-24

■ジャズは古臭いと思ってるあなたに捧げる10曲

今この増田を読んでるあなたは、「ジャズ」、と聞いたとき、何を思い浮かべますか。

十中八九、そこらへんのファーストフード店や喫茶店で流れている、”おしゃれ”な音楽を思い浮かべるでしょう。あるいは、スウィングガールズ効果で、吹奏楽界隈でも一時期流行ったSing Sing Singのような曲も、頭の中で流れるかもしれません。

これは、まさにそうした人々のための増田です。広いジャズ世界の中でも極々一部の曲を聴いてジャズを知った気になる、あるいはジャズはどこか古いものだと思ってしまう、これほどもったいないことはありません。

前置きが長くなりますが、以下から本題です。動画サイトへのリンクも張っておいたので、気に入った方は今後のジャズ界の振興のためにも AmazonなりiTunesなりなんなりで高音質のものを買ってください。

"Not Yet"by Michle Camilo

http://youtu.be/tZOCdrwGch4

最高。何も考えずに聴きに行くべし。

これだけだとあまりにも不親切だからもう少し何か書くと、Anthony Jacksonのベースラインを聴くだけでも絶頂できます。

"Barcelona"by Metropole Orkest

http://youtu.be/-GcTk91J0iE

二発目は稀代のコンポーザー/アレンジャーVince Mendozaを擁するメトロポールによるバルセロナ。聴けば分かるように、オーケストラとビッグバンドのコラボレーションが、一昔前の映画音楽でよく見られたような、ストリングスはストリングスで独立していて、前でなんかジャズの奴らがごちゃごちゃ遊んでいるというものではなく、不可分のものとして一つの芸術作品を作り上げています。はい、意味が分からないという人は、ぜひ一度だまされたと思って聴きに行っていましょう。

"Cerulean Skies"by Maria Schneider

http://youtu.be/HS-x4-_tCAE

演奏は慶應義塾大学 Light Music Society、通称慶応ライト。恐らくこれを聞いた人は、これがジャズなの!?と驚くでしょう。ジャズです。心が洗われるような、美しいその音楽性には涙を流すほかありません――大自然の息吹を感じるのです。Maria Schneiderはこの他にも多くの曲を出していますが、初期のアルバムはもっとジャズ色が強めな一方、最近のアルバムはクラシックにかなり傾倒しているので、この曲が収録されているSky Blue 前後の作風が好きです。

ちなみに、この演奏は生で聴いていました。

"As Seen from Above"by Jan Garbarek

http://youtu.be/Fzeb7paMftM

これもまたきれいな曲です。前曲よりもフュージョン寄りですが、ドンキーコング2のとげとげタル迷路と、どことなく似た雰囲気を持っていると思いませんか？独特なソプラノサックスの音色と共に歌い上げられるメロディ、ミニマルな雰囲気を生み出しているバック。気分は海の中に漂っているようです。少なくとも私は広大な海原に一人放り出されて息を止めたまま海流に流されるままの自分を夢想しながら聴いています。

"Expansion"by The Orchestra

http://www.nicozon.net/watch/sm9452541

北欧系ビッグバンドでは有名どころの一つです。ディスコ音楽とジャズの融合という、見た目だけだとゲテモノ間違いなしですが、いざ聴いてみると違和感はありません。まあ、もともとジャズもみんなで楽しく歌って演奏して踊るものだったのですから、親和性は元々高かったのでしょう。映像からも分かるように、踊っています。というか、思いっきりディスコです。ちなみに、このバージョンはショート版で、アルバムにはロング版が収録されており、ロング版のテナーサックスソロは必聴です。

"Tortoise and the Hare"by Yellow Jackets

http://youtu.be/hMGz0-fJ-Xw

Yellow Jacketsのナンバーはどれもかっこいいのですが、今回はこの「ウサギとカメ」をチョイスしました。ピアノの美しいイントロ、ドラムによって加速するドライブ感、そしてサックスのどこかゆったりとしたフレーズと絡み合うせわしないピアノ――ここに、ウサギとカメの名称の由来が来ているのだと私は勝手に思い込んでいます。これはかっこいい曲だ。

"Return of the Kung Fu World Champion"by 上原ひろみ

http://youtu.be/rk7_dXIKt0Y

みなさんもグラミー賞を取ったということでご存知の上原ひろみ。ですが、この人の曲を実際に聴いたことがある人ってどれくらいいますか？ということで、数ある曲の中から、変わり種に入りそうな、シンセサイザーがかわいらしくピコピコ鳴っていて、どことなく8ビットの香りも漂ってくる、ただでさえ聴いていると体力が奪われるのに、ライブだから余計に疲れる、カロリーの高い曲をチョイスしました。目まぐるしく変化していく曲調にあなたは目を回すこと間違いなし。

"FirstCircle"by Pat Metheny

http://youtu.be/LEmL6tIaYWU

ジョジョのエンディングテーマを演奏していることでネット界でにわかに脚光を浴びているPat Methenyによるナンバー。この人も良い曲をたくさん持っているのですが、今回はメセニーらしさがぞんぶんに出ている曲を選びました。よくわからない拍子、男声ヴォーカル、爽やかな雰囲気。はい、メセニーですね。ただ、こだわりのエレキギターの音を聴けないのが残念です。

本当はメセニーの世界を余すところなく堪能できるOrchestrionを紹介しようと思ったのですが、長すぎるのでやめました。

"Phobos"by DarcyJames Argue'sSecret Society

http://youtu.be/bEd6fIq-WnM

名前からして古臭さを一切感じさせないですね。フォボスとか、宇宙にまで行っちゃいましたよ。そしてこのバンド名も厨二病溢れる名称。曲も退廃的な雰囲気を漂わせちゃって、なんか厨二病っぽいです。テナーサックスソロも厨二病っぽいです。

"Toys"by Vertu

http://youtu.be/9NcEo9I_flU

曲調がしょっちゅう変わる曲その２。とにかくにぎやかで豪華で壮大で荘厳でいかめしくていかつくて以下省略。とにかく聴いていて飽きません。疲れません。おなか一杯になりにくいです。上原ひろみのものと比べたら、耳にやさしいです。あえて無駄にでかい虚栄心を張ったスケールの曲なので、ラストにふさわしいでしょう。

いかがでしたでしょうか。

ジャズの新たな世界は開けましたか？

Permalink |記事への反応(10) | 22:02

ツイートシェア

2014-05-20

■http://anond.hatelabo.jp/20140520182906

20歳未満だな。

ガールって何歳まで？

girl 1child afemale child
child 1young personsomeone who isnot yet an adult
adult a fully-grown person, orone who is considered to be legally responsible for their actions:

ロングマン英英辞典によると

ガールとは女性の子どもであり

子どもとは大人でないことであり

大人とは法的な権利より認められたもの

で日本では２０歳からが成人なので

２０歳未満

Permalink |記事への反応(2) | 18:33

ツイートシェア