  |
はてなキーワード:MAYとは
2016年10月版にも入ってるみたいだけど、2016年ってコロナ前じゃね？
1.3.3.4 Brand Protection and Use of theVisa-Owned Marks
A Member must not use theVisa-Owned Marks:
• Inany manner thatmay bring theVisa-Owned Marks orVisa Inc. orits affiliates into disrepute
• In relation to, or for the purchase or trade of, photographs, video imagery,computer-generated images,cartoons, simulation, orany other media oractivities including, but not limited to,any of the following:
- Child pornography
- Bestiality
- Rape (orany other non-consensual sexual behavior)
- Non-consensual mutilation of a person orbody part
A Member thatdoes not complywith these requirementswill be subject to non-compliance assessments prescribed under the Global Brand Protection Program and/or, in theEuropeRegion, the Electronic Commerce Merchant Monitoring Program.
A Member must not use theVisa-Owned Marks
日本語訳はこうな？
会員は、以下の場合においてVisa所有のマークを使用してはなりません：
生成AIのClaudeが3.7になってめちゃくちゃ性能上がって簡単な要求にも質の良い長文をドサーって出してくれるようになって、ボクは技術者でも商売人でもないから使うのは無料版で自分のおかず用のエロ小説生成なんだけど、これも長文で質の良い文章を一気に出力してくれるから重宝して何度も何度も繰り返し使ってたら、ある時ガクッと生成小説のレベルが落ちてしまい右上に「Switched to ClaudeHaiku Due to high demand, Claude 3.5 Sonnetis temporarily unavailable for free plans. Claude 3.5Haikuis faster butmay provide less detailed responses.」のメッセージ。お前の要求はエロ過ぎるから3.7は使わせませんってか。これアカウントログアウトして別のアカウント作ってログインしても同じメッセージが出るのよ。もう3.7なしじゃAI生成のエロ小説に満足できない体になってしまったのに酷い。
ほーん、そうなんか。
別に自分も投稿歴があるわけじゃないからよく知らんけど、検索して公式の投稿ガイドラインhttps://info.arxiv.org/help/submit/index.html
Weonlyaccept submissions from registered authors. Ifyou are a newuser or are submitting to a new category,youmay be required to find endorsements.
https://note.com/beatangel/n/nf3cc050ac5ba
男性の脳の総容積は平均して体格差を考慮しても男性の方が大きく、1般的に女性より大きいことは以前から
一般においてもwikipediaに脳の容積に性差がある記述があるぐらいには既知なので
学問の世界で否定する人はおらんのでは？タブーでもなんでもないと思う、高卒だしアカデミアの世界は知らんけど
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S014976341500250X?ref=quillette.com
因みに研究分析によれば脳の総容積の違いはIQの分散（違いを説明する為の因子としてどの重要か）の約16%を占めるそうである。
ソースとしている論文のハイライトにはBrain sizeis not a necessary cause forhumanIQ differencesとあり
技術の進歩により脳の大きさとIQの相関が今まで言われていたよりずっと小さいことが分かったと書いてある
また、この論文は最後に「However, invoking the literatureoncross-species comparisons and primate cognitiveevolution to argue for brain sizeas anisomorphicproxy forhumanintelligence differencesis not warranted. Suchassumptions are」と釘を刺しているが
なぜ釘を刺さないといけないのかということを彼自身が証明してしまっている…
2015年に504人の調査では子供において負の相関関係（皮質が薄いほど認知能力がある）が確認された。
このような事実は何故物議を醸すのか？
女の脳は男よりも厚い、しかし、薄いほど認知能力がある、よって女は男より認知能力が劣ると言いたいようだが
These findings suggest thatintelligencemay bemore related to themagnitude and timing of changes in brainstructure during development than to brainstructureperse, and that thecortexis never completed but shows continuingintelligence-dependent development.
単純に薄いほどIQが高いという話ではなくどのタイミングで薄くなるかということが重要な様
In themore intelligent young adults, this relationship reverses so thatby theage of 42 a thickercortexisassociated with higherintelligence
https://note.com/beatangel/n/nd0232cdd3c61
女性の発達障害について2昔前は「発達障害は男性的な特徴の過剰化が原因であり、従って女性にはあまり存在しない（極端な男性脳）」と言われてきた。
しかし、発達障害概念の広がりに伴って女性当事者が増え始め、また脳の状態をスキャンするとそこまで男女比がないことなどが明らかになり、
1昔前は「女性当事者はソーシャルスキルに優れているので発達障害症状を誤魔化せてしまい、周囲から気付かれにくい」と言われてきた。
しかし定量的に比較した結果、ソーシャルスキルに性差がないことが判明し、
今（2021年）では「女性はジェンダーバイアスによりコミュ障でも男性より好意的に見られやすく、また良いも悪いも女性社会の強烈な同調圧力により逸脱を抑え込まれてる」説が唱えられている。
彼は以前の記事でこのように書いている、ASDおよびADHDの男女比に大きな偏りがあるがそれは脳の性差ではないと
しかし、彼が一番最初に示した論文は違うことを言っている、脳の容積以外にも様々なデータをとり脳に性差があることを示し
それらが一部の精神疾患における男女の偏りの原因を解明する一歩になるのではないかと、論文中でも以下が言及されている
Why Are AutismSpectrum ConditionsMore Prevalent in Males?
https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001081
もちろん、認知症のように女が男より多い疾患もありそれらにも言及されているし
脳の性差がこれらと関連していると決定づけているわけではない
彼の良い所はソースを示してくれること、実際、興味深いものが多いが
記事の信ぴょう性は薄いというのが個人的な感想、どうもチェリーピッキングしてるっぽいから自分で論文読めばいいと思う
アンチフェミニズムを拗らせた結果、憎んでいる相手と同じになっていないか？
一番古い5年前のnoteを読んでみたがこの時の彼は好印象だった
”スコットランド政府は、そのセーフアクセスゾーンと称する範囲に家があ
る市⺠たちに⼿紙を送りつけて、⾃宅内の詩的なお祈りですら、この法律違反になりかねな
いぞと警告したんです。当然ながら、政府はその読者に対し、イギリスやヨーロッパでこの
思考犯罪を犯した疑いのある同胞たちを通報するよう奨励したんです。” 原文：ThislastOctober, just a few months ago, the Scottishgovernment began distributing letters to citizens whose houses lay within so-called safeaccess zones,warning them that even private prayer within their ownhomesmay amount tobreaking the law. Naturally, thegovernment urged readers to reportany fellow citizens suspectedguilty of thought crime inBritainand acrossEurope.
2024年9月、スコットランド政府は「Abortion Services (SafeAccess Zones) (Scotland)Act 2024」を施行し、すべての中絶サービス提供施設の周囲200メートル以内を「安全アクセスゾーン」と定めました。このゾーン内では、女性やスタッフの意思決定に影響を与えたり、アクセスを妨げたり、恐怖や嫌がらせ、不安を引き起こす行為が犯罪とされています。
ttps://www.gov.scot/news/safe-access-zones/ 政府公式ページ
”ニュース
スコットランドのすべての中絶サービスの周りの200メートルの保護ゾーンが設置されました。
これらのゾーン内では、サービスにアクセスするための女性とスタッフの決定に影響を与える可能性のある方法で意図的または無謀に行動することは、今や刑事犯罪です。彼らのアクセスを妨げる;そうでなければ、警報、嫌がらせ、または苦痛を引き起こします。
スコットランド警察は法律を施行する責任があります。法律を破った人は、裁判所の手続きに応じて、£10,000までの罰金を科されるか、無制限の罰金が科せられます。
犯罪が犯されたかどうかを判断することは、スコットランド警察、クラウンオフィス、検察庁、裁判所の問題になります。各ケースの事実と状況に応じて、犯罪行為のいくつかの例には、中絶サービスにアクセスしないように誰かに説得し、クリニックや病院に出入りしようとする人々を取り囲み、チラシを配ることが含まれます。、宗教的な説教と沈黙の徹夜。原文；approachingsomeone totry and persuade them not toaccess abortion services, surrounding peopleas theytry togoin or out of theclinic or hospital, handingout leaflets, religious preaching and silent vigils.
“セーフアクセスゾーンの導入は、女性の中絶権を保護する上で重要なマイルストーンです–誰も女性の個人的な医療決定に干渉する権利がなく、法律により、そのことが十分に明らかになっています。
“ジリアン・マッカイと、この法律を進展させるための彼らの仕事に関係したすべての人々に感謝します。私は特に、法案のプロセス中に発言し、経験を共有することに信じられないほどの勇気を示した女性を認識したいと思います。
“すべての中絶サービスの周りの200メートルの新しいゾーンは、女性が脅迫を受けずにヘルスケアに安全にアクセスできるようにするのに役立ちます–。この法律は、多くの人が深く個人的で困難な決定を下すことに信じられないほど脆弱であると感じるときに、女性を保護することです。”
ーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーー
特に、政府が配布したガイダンスでは、「意図的または無謀に」行われる「宗教的説教」や「静かな集会（silent vigils）」などの活動が禁止される可能性があると明記されています。さらに、エディンバラの「安全アクセスゾーン」内の住民に送付された手紙では、自宅内での行為であっても、法律に抵触する可能性があると警告されています。
https://www.gbnews.com/news/praying-at-home-illegal-scottland-safe-access-zones-abortion-law
”スコットランドの新しい「安全なアクセスゾーン」中絶法では、自宅での祈りは違法である可能性 公開日:2024年10月10日 -”
”エディンバラの「安全なアクセスゾーン」の居住者に投稿された手紙は、彼らが自宅で実行された訴訟のために刑事訴追に直面する可能性があると警告したとテレグラフは報じている。”
この法律の施行により、特定の地域内での祈りや宗教的活動が制限されることとなり、住民や宗教団体から懸念の声が上がっています。一方で、政府はこの措置が中絶サービスを利用する女性やスタッフの安全とプライバシーを守るためのものであると説明しています。
ttps://www.gbnews.com/news/abortion-clinics-silent-prayer-safe-zones-banned-home-office
”内務省は、中絶反対運動家が静かに診療所外で祈ることを禁止することを検討していると述べました。”
”沈黙の祈りは、心の関与であり、神への祈りの中で考えられており、1998年の人権法の下で絶対的な権利として保護されており、それ自体では、いかなる状況でも犯罪と見なされるべきではありません。”
いちおう揺り戻しも来ている模様
ttps://www.gbnews.com/news/video-silent-prayer-demonstrator-claims-police-turn-blind-eye-attacks-pro-lifers
“クレイジーなことは、私（2回逮捕された）が静かに路上で祈っているとき、通りにも止まっている他の人々がいるということです。誰かがタバコを持っているかもしれません、誰かが友人を待っているか、タクシーを待っているかもしれません。
“警察はこれらの人々のいずれにも近づかず、彼らに尋ねません、彼らは祈っていますか、彼らは何を考えていますか？
“しかし、地元の人々の何人かは私がプロライフであることを知っており、警察に連絡するので、警察は彼らをサポートし、地域の分裂の精神を強制するのを助けました。”
J.D.ヴァンス米副大統領の、ミュンヘン安保会議 (2025/2024)での発言 -山形浩生の「経済のトリセツ」 202 users cruel.hatenablog.com政治と経済
https://cruel.org/candybox/JDvanceMunich2025_j.pdf
”(注： 書き起こしは以下から取ったがYouTube に上がっている実際の演説を聴いても遺漏はない。https://thespectator.com/topic/read-jd-vance-full-speech-decay-europe/ )”
ーーとあるが、thespectator.comのテキストデータは「要登録」なので他を探そう
”(訳注：この演説のほぼ当⽇に、ミュンヘンで難⺠申請中のアフガン移⺠が⾞でデモ隊に突っ込んで数⼗
⼈を負傷させたテロ事件のことを指している)”
https://www.bbc.com/japanese/articles/ckgrjl6n68xo 日本語ニュースはこれなど
ttps://edition.cnn.com/2025/02/13/europe/munich-car-hits-people-intl/index.html
”Iwas struck that a formerEuropean commissioner wentontelevision recently and sounded delighted that theRomanian government had just annulled an entire election.”
”(訳注：2024 年にルーマニア憲法法廷が、⼤統領選第⼀次投票が外国の介⼊で歪んで右派のジョルジェ
スク候補が優位だったのを無効にした話。これに対して元欧州委員のティエリー・ブレトンがそれを歓迎
する発⾔をした)”
ルーマニア大統領選事件 はWIKIPEDIA で項目が立っているttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accusations_of_Russian_interference_in_the_2024_Romanian_presidential_election
ttps://rmc.bfmtv.com/actualites/international/on-l-a-fait-en-roumanie-thierry-breton-reagit-aux-ingerences-de-musk-en-allemagne-avec-l-afd_AN-202501090232.html
Thierry Bretonがルーマニア大統領選に関して述べたのはこれ（フランス語）
ttps://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/P-10-2025-000150_EN.html#def1
パブコメ投書箱的なところで、「元とは言え欧州委員がこう言ってるんだがお前ら欧州委員会はそれについてどう思ってるんじゃい」という投書も
「2025年1月9日、元欧州委員会委員ティエリーブレトンはフランスのテレビチャンネルRMCストーリーに、ドイツのAfD党がドイツの選挙で勝利した場合、ルーマニアで行われた‘と同様に、欧州連合によって破棄される可能性があると語った。彼は言った[1]。
2025年1月12日、何千人ものルーマニア人が選挙の無効化に抗議し、国家主権への攻撃と見なされたこの決定に対する不満を表明するためにブカレストの街を訪れました。
1。欧州委員会は、ドイツでの選挙の無効化の可能性に関するティエリーブレトンの発言を支持しますか？」
ttps://www.romaniajournal.ro/politics/ex-commissioner-breton-what-was-done-in-romania-may-be-needed-in-germany/
背景として知っておきたいのはティエリーブレトンとマスクは犬猿の仲、お互い口撃しあっている間柄ということ
ttps://www.brusselstimes.com/1388595/elon-musk-calls-former-eu-digital-chief-breton-tyrant-of-europe-tbtb
ttps://www.nli-research.co.jp/report/detail/id=80510
欧州委員会によるTikTok監査－ルーマニア選挙における外国勢力の干渉
ニッセイ基礎研究所保険研究部専務取締役研究理事 兼ヘルスケアリサーチセンター長
松澤 登
「欧州委員会は、選挙プロセス自体の適否はルーマニア国民が判断すべきことであり、欧州委員会の権能を超えるとしてその内容には干渉しないとする。ただし、DSA上で、特に巨大なプラットフォーム(Very largeonline platform、VLOP)に指定されているTikTokのルーマニア選挙における行為については、DSA違反かどうかの監視（monitoring）を強化するとした。」
EU公式には「気に食わないやつらが勝ったらバシバシその選挙を無効にしてやるぜぇ」などとは言っていない（当然）
というわけで、ティエリーブレトンの発言を象徴に欧州政治家全体を印象付ける言説には要注意
（続く）
The server encountered an internalerror or misconfiguration andwas unable to completeyour request.
Please contact the server administratoratroot@localhost to inform them ofthe time thiserror occurred, and the actionsyou performed just before thiserror.
More information about thiserrormay be available in the servererrorlog.
The server encountered an internalerror or misconfiguration andwas unable to completeyour request.
Please contact the server administratoratroot@localhost to inform them ofthe time thiserror occurred, and the actionsyou performed just before thiserror.
More information about thiserrormay be available in the servererrorlog.
例えば、
https://github.com/timdetering/Wintellect.PowerCollections/tree/master
License.txt
4. COMMERCIAL DISTRIBUTION
Commercial distributors ofsoftwaremayaccept certain responsibilities withrespect to end users, business partners andthe like. While this licenseis intended to facilitate the commercial use of the Program, the Contributorwho includes the Program in a commercial product offering should do so in a manner whichdoes not create potential liability for other Contributors. Therefore, if a Contributor includes the Program in a commercial product offering, such Contributor ("Commercial Contributor") hereby agrees to defend and indemnify every other Contributor ("Indemnified Contributor") againstany losses, damages and costs (collectively "Losses") arising from claims, lawsuits and other legal actions broughtby a third party against the Indemnified Contributor tothe extent causedby the acts or omissions of such Commercial Contributor in connection withits distribution of the Program in a commercial product offering. The obligations in this section do not apply toany claims or Losses relating toany actual orallegedintellectual property infringement. In order to qualify, an Indemnified Contributor must: a) promptly notify the Commercial Contributor in writing of such claim, and b) allow the Commercial Contributor to control, and cooperatewith the Commercial Contributor in, the defenseand any related settlement negotiations. The Indemnified Contributormay participate inany such claimatits own expense.
For example, a Contributor might include the Program in a commercial product offering, Product X. That Contributoris then a Commercial Contributor. If that Commercial Contributor then makes performance claims, or offers warranties related to Product X, those performance claims and warranties are such Commercial Contributor's responsibilityalone. Under this section, the Commercial Contributor would have to defend claims against the other Contributors related to those performance claims and warranties, and if a court requiresany other Contributor to payany damagesas a result, the Commercial Contributor must pay those damages.
要約すると裁判でここの作者が損害賠償を命じられそうになった場合、商用ソフトの提供元は裁判に協力しないといけないし、求償請求にも応じないといけないとある。
Please consider the histroy ofhumanity from biologicalperpsecitve and currentknown fact in nearbyuniverse, whichexpo-planet (from theSol systemperspective)ismostlikely to have civlizaedsociety? Pleaseaddpercentagenext toit in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanetcivilizationlikelihoodを28 秒行う
OK, I’mlookingatthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon an exoplanet within ourSolar System.I’ll consider biologicalhistory and current space knowledge,aiming to identifythe most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from ourSolar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard'sStar, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1,focusingon their habitablezonesand available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilizedsocietylikelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m notingkey exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which haveEarth-like characteristicsand are in habitablezones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advancedcivilizations.
I'm gathering infoonplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, consideringfactorslikemagneticfields,atmospheres, and proximity to G-typestars for their potential to support advancedcivilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despitebeing closeand around ared dwarfstar, might supportlife ifithas amagneticfieldand atmosphere. This makes me think aboutits potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimatingcivilization probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculativepercentagesbasedon the Drake equation and the lack ofevidence for intelligentlife.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names andcivilizationlikelihoodpercentages, grounded in the longtimeline oflife'sevolution, despite the speculativenature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering theirstar types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advancedcivilizations from oursolar system'sviewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due toits closeness and observational potential, despite concerns aboutitsflarestar dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'mfocusingon exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, andK2-18b,aiming to chart theirlikelihood of hosting a civilizedsocietybasedon current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety, consideringEarth's long biologicalhistory.
Refining odds
I'm considering theastronomicaltimeline for intelligentlifeonEarth,leading me toassign evenlower speculative odds for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrarypercentages, clearly noting the speculativenature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience'sbasic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrarypercentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculativenature, and ensuring the datais accessible foryoung audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating amarkdowntable with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of civilizedlifeon exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoreticalnature and considering the understandinglevel of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mappingout amarkdown chart with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon exoplanets, mindful of thecomplexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecingtogethermarkdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b'sreduced civilizedlife chance due to thered dwarf's activity. This inclusionhighlights the speculativenature of the analysis.
Piecingtogether speculative odds
I’m detailing amarkdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanetlikelihoods, considering environmental challengesand adding a disclaimer about the speculativenature and lack ofevidence.
Piecingtogether
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b forits proximity and silentstar, butI’lladd a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advancedcivilizations' hypotheticallikelihood.
Assessingcivilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligentlifeonEarth, which suggests that the odds ofany habitableplanet developing acomplexcivilization might beaslowas a fewpercent.
Belowis a very speculative chart that—basedon what we know aboutEarth’s long, windingpath fromsimplelife to a “civilizedsociety” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives somefun,made‑uppercentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists havenot yetfoundany proof oflife (let alone advancedcivilizations)onany exoplanet. Thesenumbers are just playful estimates to helpyou think about theideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an AdvancedCivilizationon Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet EstimatedLikelihood of a CivilizedSociety
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
HowDid We (Very Roughly) Guess TheseNumbers?
Earth’s Example:
OnEarth,life beganassimple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that builtcomplex societies. This longjourney suggests that—even if aplanetis in the “habitablezone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilizedsociety might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
Thisis the closest exoplanet to us. Even thoughitsstar (Proxima Centauri)is ared dwarf that sometimes sendsout strongflares (which might harmlife),its closeness makesitone of ourmost interesting candidates. That’swhy we giveit a slightly higher guess (~2%).
Theseplanets are part of agroup orbiting a verycoolstar. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaningone sidealwaysfaces thestar), so the chance of acomplex, advancedcivilization might be abitlower.
LHS 1140 b:
Thisplanetis promising in some ways butis alittle fartherawayand around a dimmerstar, so our playful estimateis evenlower.
All of thesepercentages are extremely rough guessesbasedon whatlittle we understand about the conditions forlife andintelligence. Scientists useideaslike the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concreteevidence, thesenumbers remain just forfun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring theseideas—and remember, spaceis full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equationitself and see if this euqationis acculate ormore opition in the equationyouwill use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation'svalue
OK, let me see. The Drake Equationisn't a precise formula;it'smore of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluatingits conceptualnature,its uncertain parameters, andits criticism to concludeonits reliabilityas an accurate predictivemodel.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mappingout the Drake Equationas a conceptual guide, detailingits parameters, which are oftenbasedon estimates or opinions, to evaluateits reliability for predicting extraterrestrialcivilizations.
The Drake Equationis a famous formula thatwas created to help scientists think about the manyfactors involved in estimating thenumber of detectable extraterrestrialcivilizations in ourgalaxy. However, when welookat the equation closely, we see thatitismore of a conceptualframework or heuristictool than a precise, predictive formula.Let’sbreak downwhy:
The equationis usually writtenas:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The averagerate ofstar formationper year in ourgalaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of thosestars that haveplanetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The averagenumber ofplanets that could potentially supportlifeperstar withplanets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of thoseplanets wherelife actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction ofplanets withlife where intelligentlife evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction ofcivilizations that develop technology that releases detectablesignals into space.
𝐿
L: The length oftime suchcivilizations release detectablesignals.
Why the Drake EquationIsMore of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction ofstars withplanets), have become better known through modernastronomy.
The parameters related to the development oflife andintelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—arebasedon very limited data. For example,Earthis theonlyplanet we know wherelifehas developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for thesefactors. This means that thevalues chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of PossibleValues:
Because many of thesefactors are not well-constrained, ifyouchangeone of themore uncertain parameters even slightly, thefinal estimate for
𝑁
N (thenumber ofcivilizations) can varyby many orders ofmagnitude. This wide range shows that the equation canlead to very differentoutcomesbasedonpersonal or theoreticalassumptions.
The Drake Equationwas never meant to provide a preciseanswer. Instead,it servesas a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrialcivilizations.It encourages discussion about the relative importance of differentfactors andhighlights where our scientific knowledgeis limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate orMore Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In thesense ofbeing a strict mathematicalmodel with well-defined inputs and predictableoutputs, the Drake Equationis not accurate.Its accuracyis limitedbythe extreme uncertainties in several ofitskey parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning theevolution oflife andintelligence, arebasedon opinion, interpretation, and the single example ofEarth. Therefore, while thestructure of the equationis logical, thenumbersyou put intoit (and hence thefinal result) are oftenmore reflective of our current opinionsand assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equationis a valuabletool for framing the question of extraterrestriallife.It helps scientists and enthusiastsbreak down acomplex problem into smaller,more manageable questions. However, because several ofitsfactors are highly uncertain and subject topersonal interpretation,itismore of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of thenumber of extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Insummary, while the Drake Equationis useful for thinking about the variousfactors that mightlead to the emergence of acivilization,itsoutputs should betakenas highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the longhistory ofSol system and nearbyplanets and see if thereisany possiblites that inonetime intelligentlife emerged in nearbyplanets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-humanintelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-humanintelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligentlife forms in theSol system and neighboringplanets, and how this mightfactor into the equation.
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligentlife, possiblyonMars orEuropa, into the Drake Equation for theSol system and neighboringplanets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligentlife emergingonMars orVenus, thoughEarth remains theonly knownlife-supportingplanet in thesolar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligentlife could have emergedonplanetslikeMars,Venus, orEuropa, and how thispossibility alignswith the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligentlifeonMars orVenus could intersectwith theassumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems tofocussolelyonEarth-basedevolution.
I’m piecingtogether the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligentlife in thesolar system.Mars,Venus, and Titan present challenges, butEuropa and Enceladus might harbor microbiallife.
Please consider the histroy ofhumanity from biologicalperpsecitve and currentknown fact in nearbyuniverse, whichexpo-planet (from theSol systemperspective)ismostlikely to have civlizaedsociety? Pleaseaddpercentagenext toit in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanetcivilizationlikelihoodを28 秒行う
OK, I’mlookingatthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon an exoplanet within ourSolar System.I’ll consider biologicalhistory and current space knowledge,aiming to identifythe most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from ourSolar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard'sStar, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1,focusingon their habitablezonesand available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilizedsocietylikelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m notingkey exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which haveEarth-like characteristicsand are in habitablezones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advancedcivilizations.
I'm gathering infoonplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, consideringfactorslikemagneticfields,atmospheres, and proximity to G-typestars for their potential to support advancedcivilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despitebeing closeand around ared dwarfstar, might supportlife ifithas amagneticfieldand atmosphere. This makes me think aboutits potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimatingcivilization probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculativepercentagesbasedon the Drake equation and the lack ofevidence for intelligentlife.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names andcivilizationlikelihoodpercentages, grounded in the longtimeline oflife'sevolution, despite the speculativenature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering theirstar types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advancedcivilizations from oursolar system'sviewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due toits closeness and observational potential, despite concerns aboutitsflarestar dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'mfocusingon exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, andK2-18b,aiming to chart theirlikelihood of hosting a civilizedsocietybasedon current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety, consideringEarth's long biologicalhistory.
Refining odds
I'm considering theastronomicaltimeline for intelligentlifeonEarth,leading me toassign evenlower speculative odds for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrarypercentages, clearly noting the speculativenature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience'sbasic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrarypercentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculativenature, and ensuring the datais accessible foryoung audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating amarkdowntable with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of civilizedlifeon exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoreticalnature and considering the understandinglevel of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mappingout amarkdown chart with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon exoplanets, mindful of thecomplexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecingtogethermarkdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b'sreduced civilizedlife chance due to thered dwarf's activity. This inclusionhighlights the speculativenature of the analysis.
Piecingtogether speculative odds
I’m detailing amarkdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanetlikelihoods, considering environmental challengesand adding a disclaimer about the speculativenature and lack ofevidence.
Piecingtogether
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b forits proximity and silentstar, butI’lladd a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advancedcivilizations' hypotheticallikelihood.
Assessingcivilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligentlifeonEarth, which suggests that the odds ofany habitableplanet developing acomplexcivilization might beaslowas a fewpercent.
Belowis a very speculative chart that—basedon what we know aboutEarth’s long, windingpath fromsimplelife to a “civilizedsociety” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives somefun,made‑uppercentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists havenot yetfoundany proof oflife (let alone advancedcivilizations)onany exoplanet. Thesenumbers are just playful estimates to helpyou think about theideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an AdvancedCivilizationon Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet EstimatedLikelihood of a CivilizedSociety
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
HowDid We (Very Roughly) Guess TheseNumbers?
Earth’s Example:
OnEarth,life beganassimple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that builtcomplex societies. This longjourney suggests that—even if aplanetis in the “habitablezone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilizedsociety might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
Thisis the closest exoplanet to us. Even thoughitsstar (Proxima Centauri)is ared dwarf that sometimes sendsout strongflares (which might harmlife),its closeness makesitone of ourmost interesting candidates. That’swhy we giveit a slightly higher guess (~2%).
Theseplanets are part of agroup orbiting a verycoolstar. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaningone sidealwaysfaces thestar), so the chance of acomplex, advancedcivilization might be abitlower.
LHS 1140 b:
Thisplanetis promising in some ways butis alittle fartherawayand around a dimmerstar, so our playful estimateis evenlower.
All of thesepercentages are extremely rough guessesbasedon whatlittle we understand about the conditions forlife andintelligence. Scientists useideaslike the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concreteevidence, thesenumbers remain just forfun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring theseideas—and remember, spaceis full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equationitself and see if this euqationis acculate ormore opition in the equationyouwill use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation'svalue
OK, let me see. The Drake Equationisn't a precise formula;it'smore of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluatingits conceptualnature,its uncertain parameters, andits criticism to concludeonits reliabilityas an accurate predictivemodel.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mappingout the Drake Equationas a conceptual guide, detailingits parameters, which are oftenbasedon estimates or opinions, to evaluateits reliability for predicting extraterrestrialcivilizations.
The Drake Equationis a famous formula thatwas created to help scientists think about the manyfactors involved in estimating thenumber of detectable extraterrestrialcivilizations in ourgalaxy. However, when welookat the equation closely, we see thatitismore of a conceptualframework or heuristictool than a precise, predictive formula.Let’sbreak downwhy:
The equationis usually writtenas:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The averagerate ofstar formationper year in ourgalaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of thosestars that haveplanetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The averagenumber ofplanets that could potentially supportlifeperstar withplanets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of thoseplanets wherelife actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction ofplanets withlife where intelligentlife evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction ofcivilizations that develop technology that releases detectablesignals into space.
𝐿
L: The length oftime suchcivilizations release detectablesignals.
Why the Drake EquationIsMore of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction ofstars withplanets), have become better known through modernastronomy.
The parameters related to the development oflife andintelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—arebasedon very limited data. For example,Earthis theonlyplanet we know wherelifehas developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for thesefactors. This means that thevalues chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of PossibleValues:
Because many of thesefactors are not well-constrained, ifyouchangeone of themore uncertain parameters even slightly, thefinal estimate for
𝑁
N (thenumber ofcivilizations) can varyby many orders ofmagnitude. This wide range shows that the equation canlead to very differentoutcomesbasedonpersonal or theoreticalassumptions.
The Drake Equationwas never meant to provide a preciseanswer. Instead,it servesas a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrialcivilizations.It encourages discussion about the relative importance of differentfactors andhighlights where our scientific knowledgeis limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate orMore Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In thesense ofbeing a strict mathematicalmodel with well-defined inputs and predictableoutputs, the Drake Equationis not accurate.Its accuracyis limitedbythe extreme uncertainties in several ofitskey parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning theevolution oflife andintelligence, arebasedon opinion, interpretation, and the single example ofEarth. Therefore, while thestructure of the equationis logical, thenumbersyou put intoit (and hence thefinal result) are oftenmore reflective of our current opinionsand assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equationis a valuabletool for framing the question of extraterrestriallife.It helps scientists and enthusiastsbreak down acomplex problem into smaller,more manageable questions. However, because several ofitsfactors are highly uncertain and subject topersonal interpretation,itismore of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of thenumber of extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Insummary, while the Drake Equationis useful for thinking about the variousfactors that mightlead to the emergence of acivilization,itsoutputs should betakenas highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the longhistory ofSol system and nearbyplanets and see if thereisany possiblites that inonetime intelligentlife emerged in nearbyplanets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-humanintelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-humanintelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligentlife forms in theSol system and neighboringplanets, and how this mightfactor into the equation.
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligentlife, possiblyonMars orEuropa, into the Drake Equation for theSol system and neighboringplanets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligentlife emergingonMars orVenus, thoughEarth remains theonly knownlife-supportingplanet in thesolar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligentlife could have emergedonplanetslikeMars,Venus, orEuropa, and how thispossibility alignswith the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligentlifeonMars orVenus could intersectwith theassumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems tofocussolelyonEarth-basedevolution.
I’m piecingtogether the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligentlife in thesolar system.Mars,Venus, and Titan present challenges, butEuropa and Enceladus might harbor microbiallife.
In the labyrinthine realm ofdigital content dissemination, an enigmatic phenomenonhas surfaced, challenging our axioms regarding thenexusbetween contentubiquity andviewer cognitive acumen. This disquisition endeavors to elucidate the paradoxical inverse correlationbetween videoviewership metrics and the intellectual quotient of the audience, propounding that audiovisual content amassing prodigiousview counts tends tocaptivateviewers with a meanIntelligence Quotient (IQ) of 100, while theirmore esoteric counterparts allure a demographic boasting an averageIQ of 120.
To fathom this counterintuitiveparadigm,one must first grapplewith the multifariousnature ofhumancognition and the intricate interplaybetween intellectual capacity and media predilections. This hypothesis, positing an inverse relationshipbetween a video's popularity and the meanIQ ofitsviewership, necessitates a rigorous examination of the underlyingpsycho-sociological and neurocognitive factors thatmay engender such a paradoxicaloutcome.
Theapplication of Cognitive LoadTheory to media consumption habits provides a plausible explication for this phenomenon. Videos achievingviral status often employ reductionist narratives and readily assimilable information, minimizing cognitive strain. Conversely, less ubiquitous videos may delve intomore abstruse subject matter, demanding heightened cognitiveengagementand amore sophisticated intellectualframework for comprehensive assimilation.
The pervasive influence of recommendation algorithms in content distribution platforms cannot be discounted in this analysis. These algorithmic arbiters, designed to maximizeuserengagement,may inadvertently engender epistemic bubbles that reinforce existing cognitive predispositions. Individuals with superiorIQsmay actively seekoutmore intellectually challenging or esoteric content, thereby circumventing the algorithmic propensity towards homogenization and cognitive stasis.
Itis imperative to consider the socioeconomic dimensions thatmay influence bothIQ development and media consumption patterns. HigherIQ individuals often correlate with elevated socioeconomic status, potentially affording them greateraccess to diverse epistemological resources and fostering a predilection formore intellectually stimulating content. This demographicmay be less susceptible to the allure of mainstream, highly-viewed videos that cater to a broader, less discerning audience.
The ramifications of this inverse relationshipbetweenviewership andviewerIQ are profound for content creators and platform developers alike.It challenges the prevailingparadigm that equates popularity with quality or intellectualvalue. Content creators targeting amore intellectually discerning audiencemayneed to recalibrate theirexpectations regardingview counts andengagement metrics, focusing insteadon cultivating a dedicated niche audience thatvalues cognitive stimulationover massappeal.
In summation, the observed dichotomybetween high-viewership videos attracting an audience with an averageIQ of 100 and their less popular counterpartsappealing toviewers with a meanIQ of 120 underscores thecomplex relationshipbetween intellectual capacity and media consumption in thedigitalage. This phenomenon necessitates a reevaluation of how we measure contentvalue and success in theonlinesphere, prompting amore nuanced approach to contentcreation,curation, and consumption that acknowledges the diverse cognitiveneeds of the audiencespectrum. The implications of thisparadigmshiftextend farbeyond mere metrics, touching upon fundamental questions of epistemology, cognitivediversity, and the verynature of intellectualengagement in thedigital era.
https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/items/528f479f-fd3c-43fd-9463-7c2923560573
ある人の嗅覚倫理に関する論文だけど、文献だけで匂いが影響を与えると書いてるから女性に学位を与えるのは無駄だと言われる。
論文書くなら、裁判官にセンサーを取り付けるなり、何人かの被験者にルールを守った上で反応を調べるとかやりようはあったはず。
アタリマエのことを調べるというのは裁判での証拠提出のときに役立つからもっと調べてほしい。
けど、統計学的手法を駆使するなどして、裁判官が9割型認める内容でないと価値がない。
contemporary relevance. I suggest that smell very often invokes identity in a way that signifies an individual’s worth and status in an inarguable manner that short-circuits consciousreflection. This can be accounted forby acknowledging olfaction’s strongly affectivenature, which produces such strong bodily sensations and emotions that reflexivityisbypassed in favour of a behavioural or cognitive solution thatassuages the intense feelingmost immediately. Olfactorydisgust, therefore, tends to result in rejection, while harmful forms of olfactorydesiremay result in sublimation or subjugation. My thesisis particularly attentive to tensionsand ambivalences that complicate the typically bifurcated affectivespectrum of olfactory experiences, drawing attention to (dis)pleasurable olfactory relations that have socio-political utility. I argue that literary fictionis notonly anarena in which olfactorylogics can be instantiated, but also a laboratory in which possibilities for new kinds of relations and connections can be fostered and tested. ChapterOne exploreshow smell can be used to indicate class antipathies, partlyas they relate tohomelessness,beginning withGeorge Orwell’s seminal non-fictiontext, TheRoad to Wigan Pier (1936), before considering Iain Sinclair’s TheLastLondon (2017) and Bong JoonHo’s Parasite (2019). In ChapterTwo I explorethe fantastical, idealistic, and utopic thinking that surrounds olfaction, which presents smellas fundamentally non-human,byaddressing J. M. Coetzee’sDisgrace (1999), Virginia Woolf’s Flush (1933), Rachel Yoder’s Nightbitch (2021), and Laura Jean McKay’s The Animals in That Country (2020). Chapter Three focuseson the intersectional olfactory dimensions of ‘misogynoir’—the coextensive anti-Black racism and misogyny that Black women experience—and considers Toni Morrison’sTar Baby (1981), Bernice McFadden’sSugar (2000) andRaven Leilani’s Luster (2020). In Chapter Four, I conceptualise an oppressive olfactorylogic, whichis used against women and girls in order to legitimise their harassment or abuse, drawing primarilyon Vladimir Nabokov’sLolita (1955), but also Patrick Süskind’sPerfume (1985). ChapterFivediscussestwo forms of olfactorydesire—perversion and queerness—which have separate moral valences. Iaddress J. M. Coetzee’s The Master of Petersburg (1994),Ann Quin’sBerg (1964), and SamByers’ ComeJoin OurDisease (2020),and argue for fiction’s role in reorienting readers’ habitual relations to olfaction.
2024-06-25
無題Name名無し24/12/08(日)06:40:11IP:210.225.*(ipv4)No.100026+12月31日頃消えます[返信]
https://may.2chan.net/b/res/1278445895.htm
http://futabaforest.net/b/res/1278445895.htm
No.1278453730No.1278454559No.1278465680No.1278466804No.1278467093No.1278468010No.1278468031No.1278468635No.1278469041No.1278476929No.1278479308No.1278480804No.1278482126No.1278514185No.1278514943No.1278523516No.1278523793
まーた知恵遅れ君のだーいしゅきなくそげー！ちゅまんない！かいはつちね！！ですね。馬鹿の一つ覚えご苦労様です
「スレ画は普通にスペックが足引っ張って計略だけではデッキに入らない総合的に弱いカードだろ… 裏の手の大型弱体やダメ計略ですらない山南さんが使われないわけだ」「新土方が来て今度こそ出番かと思ったんだが結局居場所なさそうね…」(原文そのまま)出ました、障害児の馬鹿の一つ覚えのカード叩き。同じカードを同じ文言で叩くいつものエアプポエムでちゅねー
ふわっふわの具体性0で語った気になれるなんて、本当に知恵遅れに生まれてよかったですね
… 1無題Name名無し24/12/08(日)06:40:28IP:210.225.*(ipv4)No.100027+
対策の相談に対して「正解は自分も使う」(同)はい、障害児は今日も会話ができません。対策を聞かれてこれって本当に相手の言いたい事を返す力がないんですね。自分の言いたいことを捲し立ててるだけで会話にならないみじめな知恵遅れ君、人間が10歳には超える場所を何十歳になったら超えられるんでちゅか？？
「ダメ計と勝海舟以外は無理だし潰せる号令打ってもディスアドだよデッキによってはコイツ1枚で詰む」(同)今日も無理やり盛って滅茶苦茶な批評ごっこ。さすがにどんなデッキ使ってんだよと聞かれても当然答えられません。現実を知らないから妄想で大袈裟に話して気を引く以外のことができませんもんねー。ち、ち、ち、知恵遅れ～～wwww
「英傑大戦もよく筐体持つなあ」「もってるかな...印刷はまあまあ怪しくなってきてるぞ」「再印刷さえできればエラーの多さも許容したが…」「今日はサクッとプレイしてとっとと帰ろうと思ってプレイ後プリントエラー表示されると軽く絶望する」「縁使えば再印刷し放題だけど未所持と同じポイント持ってかれるのキツイよね」(同)はい、またいつもの。相変わらずシステムも何も理解せずに同じ嘘を繰り返してます
… 2無題Name名無し24/12/08(日)06:40:47IP:210.225.*(ipv4)No.100028+
知恵遅れのうわ言を繰り返し聞かされるのキツいよねって住人の声は聞こえないみたいです。障害児は馬鹿だから一方的にわめくだけでちゅもんねー
https://may.2chan.net/b/res/1278571937.htm
http://futabaforest.net/b/res/1278571937.htm
No.1278614727No.1278619828No.1278626259No.1278628998
次スレもいつもの反復行動。足掛け9時間ずーっと画面の前でオナニーポエムを垂れ流してるみたいでちゅねー
「まあ予算がね……」「フル3Dで無いのは惜しいところだがまあやり過ぎて戦国の時のように予算失うわけにもいかんし…」(同)おかねがない！おかねがにゃいよおお！！と毎度の知恵遅れワード。誰も確かめられない事を言えば馬鹿にされないって思ってるかもしれませんか、それって単なる妄想なんですよね。しょうがいじはあたまわるいでちゅねー
まあお気に入りみたいだしこれからも何百回も繰り返すでしょう。同じ事を繰り返す反復行動がだーいしゅきな頭のおかしい知恵遅れですものね
残り12-14ヶ月
NissanHas '12 to 14 Months' Left
The companymay sell a majority stake toHonda.
https://www.motor1.com/news/742467/nissan-12-to-14-months-left-to-survive/
In aninterviewwith the Financial Times,two unnamedNissan executives said the companyhas "12 to 14 months tosurvive." "Thisis going to be tough. And in the end, weneedJapan and the US to be generatingcash," they said.
I've noticed a non-negligiblenumber of peoplewho have notonly completed compulsoryeducation in regular classes but have also received highereducation and graduated from university, yetstruggle with reading comprehension (understanding the meaning oftext), cannot read longtexts, and even have difficulty understanding videos.
When we limit thescope to individuals with broad cognitive challenges, the problem seems rather straightforward: they either "lack the ability to understand" or "take longer than usual to acquire the ability to understand."
Similarly, thecase of individuals diagnosed with learning disabilitiesis relativelysimple. While theymay not have broad cognitive challenges, theyrequire different approaches and training due to their unique learning styles.
However,itis perplexing that university graduates without broad cognitive challenges or diagnosed learning disabilitiesstruggle to understand notonly writtentext but also simplified video content.
I suspect that the underlying causes might includegaps in the horizontal transfer of experiences and knowledge, a severe lack of adaptability,and anextreme deficit in metacognition.Has there beenany researchon theseissues? Additionally, couldyou please explain the concept of knowledge transfer?
(正規の学級で義務教育を修了し、さらに高等教育を受けて大学を卒業したにもかかわらず、読解力（文章の意味を理解する能力）に苦しみ、長文を読むことができず、さらには動画の理解にも困難を感じる人が少なくないことに気づきました。
認知能力に広範な課題を抱える個人に範囲を限定すると、問題は比較的単純です。「理解する能力がない」か、「理解する能力を獲得するのに通常よりも時間がかかる」かのいずれかです。
同様に、学習障害と診断された個人の場合も比較的単純です。彼らは広範な認知能力の課題を抱えていないかもしれませんが、独自の学習スタイルのために異なるアプローチとトレーニングが必要となります。
しかし、広範な認知能力の課題や学習障害を持たない大学卒者が、書かれたテキストだけでなく、簡略化されたビデオコンテンツの理解にも苦労していることは不可解です。
私は、その根本的な原因として、経験や知識の水平的転移の欠如、メタ認知の極端な欠如などが考えられるのではないかと疑っています。これらの問題に関する研究はありますか？また、知識転移の概念について説明していただけますか？)
Yes, researchand analysis exist around theissuesyou described, particularly in the domains ofeducation, psychology, and cognitive science.Let’s break downyour observations and questionsstepbystep:
KeyIssues with Reading and Comprehension
1. Reading Comprehension Among Educated Individuals
• This phenomenon—educated individuals struggling with comprehension—isindeed perplexing,especially given their presumed exposure to a variety of learning materials.It suggests thateducation systems sometimes emphasize rote learning andsurface-level knowledge acquisitionoverdeeper understanding, critical thinking, and metacognition.
• Horizontal TransferGaps: This refers to the inability to apply knowledge or skills learned inone context toanother. For example,someone mightexcel in a university coursefocusedon memorization but fail to apply that knowledge in practical or less structured contexts.
• Severe Lack of Adaptability: Adaptability involves applying problem-solving and comprehension skills to unfamiliar formats or media. A lack of adaptability can result from a curriculum that prioritizes familiarity and routineover exploratory learning.
• Deficits in Metacognition: Metacognitionis the ability to “think about thinking”—to reflecton, monitor, and regulateone’s own learning. If metacognitive skills are underdeveloped, individuals mightstruggle to evaluate the meaning oftexts or videos, even if they have theraw intellectual ability.
Research Insights
1. Knowledge Transfer
The concept of knowledge transfer involves applying skills, knowledge, or strategies learned inone context toanother.Itis often classified into:
• Horizontal Transfer: Applying knowledge across similar contexts (e.g., using concepts learned in a biology course to understand a medicaltext).
• Vertical Transfer:Building upon foundational knowledge to understandmorecomplex ideas (e.g., usingbasic algebra to solve advanced calculus problems).
Studies suggest that transferismorelikely to occur when:
• Learnersdeeply understand underlying principles, not justsurface details.
•Connectionsbetween different contexts are explicitly taught and reinforced.
• Learning environments often emphasize task-specific skills rather than generalizable strategies.
• Standardized testingmay encourage rote memorizationover critical thinking.
• Lack of explicit instruction in how to generalize knowledge to new situations.
Researchhighlights the importance of metacognition in learning. Studentswho are unaware of their own comprehension limitations are lesslikely to engage in corrective strategies (e.g., rereading, seeking clarification). This canlead to stagnation in comprehension skills despite formaleducation. Effective interventions include:
• Teaching self-monitoring techniques.
• Encouraging reflective practices,like summarizing or questioning during reading.
4. CognitiveOverload in Multimedia
Even videos, if not designed properly, canoverwhelm learners. The CognitiveTheory of Multimedia Learning suggests that excessive extraneous information or unclearorganization in videos canoverload working memory, hindering comprehension.
Strategies and Research-Based Solutions
1. Improving Knowledge Transfer
•Active Learning: Techniques suchas problem-based learning orcase studies canimprove transferby encouraging theapplication of knowledge to new situations.
• Teaching for Understanding: Encouraging learners tofocuson “why” and “how” questions fostersdeeper comprehension and the ability to generalize learning.
• Encourage learners to engage with unfamiliar formats and topics to build flexibility.
• Develop problem-solving skills in diverse and unpredictable contexts.
3. Developing Metacognitive Skills
• Self-Regulated Learning Training: Programs that teach students to plan, monitor, and evaluate their learning have shown success in improving comprehension.
•Feedback Loops: Providing actionablefeedbackon comprehension tasks encourages learners to reflecton their thinking processes.
Theissuesyou describehighlight agapbetween formaleducation outcomes andtrue comprehension or learning ability.Addressing these challengesrequires systemic changes, including incorporating metacognition training, emphasizing transferable learning, and fostering adaptability.
Ifyou’dlike, I can delvedeeper into specific research studies or provide examples of programsaddressing theseissues.
Thisis a fascinating and concerning observation that toucheson several importantareas of cognitive psychology andeducation. Let meaddress this systematically.
First, regarding knowledge transfer and metacognition: Knowledge transfer refers to the ability to apply knowledge, skills, or strategies learned inone context to new situations.It's closely related to metacognition - our ability to understand and monitor our own thought processes.
Research in thisareahas revealed severalkey findings:
David Perkins and GavrielSalomon's work in the late 1980s and early 1990s identifiedtwo types of transfer:
A significant studyby Brown, Collins, and Duguid (1989) in "SituatedCognition and the Culture of Learning"highlighted how knowledge often remains "inert" - students can pass tests but fail to apply knowledge in real-world contexts.
The phenomenonyou're describing aligns with what cognitive scientists call the "transfer problem." Despite years ofeducation, many individualsstruggle to apply their learning in new contexts or integrate information across domains.
Some relevant research directions:
1. Cognitive LoadTheory (Swelleret al.)
Shows how working memory limitations affect learning and transfer. Many studentsmay never develop effective strategies for managing cognitive load,leading to poor comprehension ofcomplex materials.
2. Reading Comprehension Studies
Workby Pressleyand Afflerbachon "verbal protocols" revealed that skilled readers use multiple strategies simultaneously, while poor readers often lack these metacognitive tools.
3. Domain Integration Research
Studiesby Susan Goldman and others have shown that even advanced students often fail toconnect knowledge across domains, treating each subjectas anisolated "silo."
Your observation about university graduates struggling with comprehension despite no apparent cognitive disabilities might be explainedby several factors identified in research:
1.Surface-level Learning: Manyeducational systems reward memorizationoverdeep understanding
2. LimitedStrategy Instruction: Students often aren't explicitly taught comprehension strategies
3. Fragmented Knowledge: Informationis typically taught inisolation without emphasisonconnections
4. Weak Metacognitive Skills: Studentsmay never develop the ability to monitor and regulate their own understanding
Some promising approaches toaddress theseissues include:
Teaching explicit strategies for comprehension, integration, and transfer. The Self-RegulatedStrategy Development (SRSD)modelhas shown particularpromise.
2. Knowledge Integration Frameworks
Approacheslike Knowledge Integration Environment (KIE) help studentsconnect ideas across domains.
3. Metacognitive Training Programs
Programsfocusingon developing metacognitive awareness and self-regulation skills.
Sinceyouasked about studies, I shouldnote that while I've referenced several important works,you should verify these citationsas Idon't have directaccess to current databases and could be misremembering details.
Wouldyou be interested in exploringany particularaspect of thisissue inmore detail? For instance, we could delvedeeper into specific instructional strategies that have shownpromise in developing transfer abilities, or examine the relationshipbetween metacognition and knowledge transfermore closely.
