「As」を含む日記

はてなキーワード:Asとは

2025-11-22

■【悲報】トランス 作家さん、世界でボコ ボコに…

https://x.com/ThePosieParker/status/1990283629394821498

This is
@Li_Kotomi
He thinks he passesas awoman 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮 he’s actually suing
@WomenReadWomen
for saying he’s aman.
Noone thinks he’s awoman.
Stay out ofwomen only spaces

これは @Li_Kotomi。

彼は自分のことを女性に見えると思っているらしい🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮

そして @WomenReadWomen が「彼は男性だ」と言ったことに対して訴えている最中。

誰も彼のことを女性だなんて思っていない。

女性専用スペースから出ていけ

Permalink |記事への反応(1) | 11:37

ツイートシェア

■ChatGPT すごい

utf8の文字コードで構成されたバイナリーファイルがある。このファイルの改行の数を数えよ。改行はCRのみとする。このファイルにはCR が必ず含まれており、CRで分割すればマルチスレッドで処理できる。

と質問したら、c++とpython のコードが出てきた

size_t count_cr_in_file(const std::string&path) {
std::ifstreamfs(path,std::ios::binary);
fs.seekg(0,std::ios::end);
size_t size =fs.tellg();
fs.seekg(0);
const size_tthread_count =std::thread::hardware_concurrency();
const size_t chunk_size = size /thread_count;
std::vector<std::future<size_t>> futures;
for (size_t t = 0; t <thread_count; t++) {
size_t start = t * chunk_size;
size_t end = (t ==thread_count - 1 ? size : (t + 1) * chunk_size);
futures.push_back(std::async(std::launch::async, [start, end, &path]() {
std::ifstreamfs(path,std::ios::binary);
fs.seekg(start);
size_t count = 0;
for (size_t i = start; i < end; i++) {
char c;
fs.read(&c, 1);
if (c == '\r') count++;
}
return count;
}));
}
size_ttotal = 0;
for (auto& f : futures)total += f.get();
returntotal;
}

def count_cr(path):
importmmap
withopen(path, "rb")as f:
mm =mmap.mmap(f.fileno(), 0,access=mmap.ACCESS_READ)
returnmm.count(b'\r')

c#で書けと指示したところ、

using System;
using System.IO;
using System.IO.MemoryMappedFiles;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
class CountCR
{
public static long CountCRInFile(string path)
{
using varmmf = MemoryMappedFile.CreateFromFile(path, FileMode.Open, null);
using varaccessor =mmf.CreateViewAccessor(0, 0, MemoryMappedFileAccess.Read);
long fileSize =accessor.Capacity;
int processorCount = Environment.ProcessorCount;
long chunkSize = fileSize / processorCount;
longtotal = 0;
object lockObj = newobject();
Parallel.For(0, processorCount, i =>
{
long start = i * chunkSize;
long end = (i == processorCount - 1) ? fileSize : (i + 1) * chunkSize;
long localCount = 0;
byte b;
for (longpos = start;pos < end;pos++)
{
accessor.Read(pos,out b);
if (b == 0x0D) //CR
localCount++;
}
lock (lockObj)
{
total += localCount;
}
});
returntotal;
}
staticvoid Main(string[] args)
{
string path = "yourfile.bin";
long count = CountCRInFile(path);
Console.WriteLine($"CR count = {count}");
}
}

というコードが出てきた。

実際はcr lf,lfもあり得るんだが、そこは考慮しなくてもよく、そう考えるとaiはすごいとしか言いようがない。

なお、utf8として成立する単位で区切りつつ改行を数える場合、もう一工夫いる。

（SJISもできるようにするともっと面倒なことになりそう…）

Permalink |記事への反応(2) | 09:50

ツイートシェア

2025-11-21

■anond:20251121215620

As aJapanese, I can confirm xxx...

みたいな定番のコメントなら国籍問わずよく見るけど、そういうやつじゃなくて文字通り I'mJapanese. で始まるの？

動画の内容やコメント内容にもよるけど、まぁそんなにぞわっとはしないかな…

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 22:30

ツイートシェア

■anond:20251121045442

As Codeの思想だ

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 13:27

ツイートシェア

2025-11-19

■anond:20250922191056

https://archive.md/YbexB

うーん、性分化がずっこける現象(性分化『障碍』)の存在を消し込めているわけではなさそうな。

だとすっと話は「いかに『治療』するか」に戻るだけですよねえ？

「as is」から逃げようとすると「人道」を踏み外す羽目になりますよ？

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 03:28

ツイートシェア

2025-11-17

■【朗報】自称IQ276男性、聖書の価値を力説

SNS上で自称 IQ276の男性が、聖書の価値について独自の見解を示し話題になっています。

投稿者は自らを「世界最高IQ保持者」と称し、以下のように述べています。

「As the world's highestIQ record holder,I believe theBible is the perfect,eternal, andfinal Word ofGod. Therefore, theBible doesn’tneed to be updated.The world needs tocatch up.」
（世界最高IQ保持者として、私は聖書が完全で永遠、そして最終的な神の言葉だと信じています。したがって、聖書を更新する必要はありません。世界が追いつくべきです。）
https://x.com/yhbryankimiq/status/1935794678504603999

投稿者は聖書を「完璧で永遠、最終的な神の言葉」と位置付け、現代の世界がそれに追いつく必要があると強調しています。

今回の投稿は、IQというインパクトあるフレーズと、聖書の価値を結び付けるユニークな内容として注目を集めています。

果たして、現代世界はこの世界最高IQ保持者の意見に追いつけるのでしょうか。

Permalink |記事への反応(1) | 05:57

ツイートシェア

2025-11-16

■anond:20251116234115

アチソン演説を知っていたら高市を非難できない。

NAZO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

あれは曖昧だったものを明言したから戦争が起こったやぞ

https://worldjpn.net/documents/texts/docs/19500112.S1E.html

This defensive perimeter runs along the Aleutians toJapan and then goes to the Ryukyus

Military Security in thePacific
Now, let's in thelight of that consider some of thee policies. First ofall, let's dealwith the question of military security. I deal withit first becauseit is important and because, having stated our policy in that regard, we must clearly understand that the military menaceis notthe most immediate.
What is the situation in regard to the military security of thePacific area, and what is our policy in regard toit?
In the first place, the defeat and the disarmament ofJapan has placed upon the United States the necessity ofassuming the military defense ofJapan so longas that is required, both in the interest of our security and in the interests of the security of the entirePacific area and, inall honor, in the interest ofJapanese security. We haveAmerican -- and there are Australian -- troops inJapan. Iam not in a position to speak for the Australians, but I canassureyou that thereis no intention ofany sort of abandoning or weakening the defenses ofJapan and that whatever arrangements are to bemade either through permanent settlement orotherwise, that defense must and shall be maintained.
This defensive perimeter runs along the Aleutians toJapan and then goes to the Ryukyus. We hold important defense positions in the RyukyuIslands, and those wewill continue to hold. In the interest of the population of the RyukyuIslands, wewill at an appropriatetime offer to hold theseislands under trusteeship ofthe United Nations. But they are essential parts of the defensive perimeter of thePacific, and they must andwill be held.
The defensive perimeter runs from the Ryukyus to thePhilippine Islands. Our relations, our defensive relationswith thePhilippines are contained in agreementsbetween us. Those agreements arebeing loyally carriedout andwill be loyally carriedout. Both peoples have learnedby bitter experience the vital connectionsbetween our mutual defense requirements. We are inno doubt about that, andit is hardly necessary for me to say anattackon thePhilippines could not and would not be toleratedby the United States. But Ihasten toadd that noone perceives the imminence ofany suchattack.
So faras the military security of otherareas in thePacific is concerned,it must be clear that no person can guarantee theseareas against militaryattack. Butit must also be clear that such a guaranteeis hardly sensible or necessary within the realm of practical relationship.
Should such anattack occur --one hesit ates to say where such an armedattack could come from -- the initial reliance must beon the peopleattacked to resistit and then upon the commitments of the entire civilized world under the Charter ofthe United Nations which so farhas not proved a weak reed to leanon by any peoplewho are determined to protect their independence againstoutside aggression. Butit is a mistake, I think, in consideringPacific and Far Eastern problems to becomeobsessed with military considerations. Importantas they are, there are other problems that press, and these other problems are not capable of solution through military means. These other problems ariseout of the susceptibility of many areas, and many countries in thePacific area, tosubversion and penetration. That cannot be stoppedby military means.

Permalink |記事への反応(1) | 23:55

ツイートシェア

■anond:20251116030513

In 1965,Vietnam seemedlike

Justanother foreignwar

Butit wasn't,it was

Different in many ways

As so were those

Who did the fighting

In WorldWar II

The average age of the

Combat soldierwas twenty-six

InVietnam, hewas nineteen

N-n-n-n-nineteen

The heaviest fighting

Of the pasttwo weeks

Continuedtoday twenty-five

Miles northwest of Saigon

Iwasn't really sure

Whatwas goingon

N-n-n-n-nineteen, nineteen

N-nineteen, nineteen

InVietnam, the combat soldier

Typically served a twelve month tour ofduty

Butwas exposed to hostilefire almost everyday

N-n-n-n-nineteen

In Saigon, a US miltary spokesman

Saidtoday,more than 720 troops

Were killedlast week in

That sensitiveborder area

Inall of SouthVietnam

The enemylost atotal of

2,689 soldiers

All thosewho remember thewar

They won't forget what they've seen

Destruction of men in theirprime

Whose average age was nineteen

D-d-d-d-d-destruction

According to aVeteran's Administration study

Half of theVietnam combatveterans suffer

From what psychiatrists call

Post-traumatic stress disorder

Many vets complain of alienation,rage, or guilt

Some succumb to suicidal thoughts

Eight to ten years after cominghome

Almost eight-hundred-thousand men

Arestill fighting theVietnam War

None of them received

Ahero's welcome

S-s-s-s-s-Saigon

Nineteen, s-s-s-s-Saigon

N-n-n-n-n-nineteen

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 03:06

ツイートシェア

2025-11-14

■anond:20251114105334

とまとだかトメィトウだか、そいつらの殴り合いをしらんが

CEDAWの活動対象にはトランス女性を含んでることだけはマジだぞ

例えば

https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/TBSearch.aspx?Lang=en&TreatyID=3&DocTypeID=11

できっちり語っとる

Although the Convention only refers tosex-based discrimination,

18. Intersectionalityis abasic concept for understanding thescope of the general
obligations of States parties contained in article 2. The discrimination of women basedon
sex andgender is inextricably linked with other factors that affect women, suchas race,
ethnicity, religion or belief, health, status,age, class, caste andsexual orientation and
gender identity.

条約が女性しか対象にしてないと思っているバカどもおるけど性自認に基づく差別、つまりトランス女性への差別も自分たちの活動範囲である

と言うてる、これ以外にも繰り返し言うとるよ。

なお、CEDAWの管轄は「国連人権高等弁務官事務所」でここの事務局はリームアルサレム否定派

つまるところ引用元になっているリーム氏はCEDAWの活動にトランス女性が入っていることに突沸して顔真っ赤にしてるだけで実際のCEDAW活動範囲はリーム氏の言うてる事の反対側です。

Permalink |記事への反応(2) | 11:27

ツイートシェア

■anond:20251114000508

トランス女性は女性に含まれないって本人からめっちゃはっきり言われてるやん

https://x.com/UNSRVAW/status/1988951169591398663

As i said in myJune 2025 report,para 6. “it can be concluded that the understanding and practice of States that are parties tointernational treatiesis that the term “woman” ininternational law refers to a person of thefemale sex.”Sex being biologicalsex. Therefore CEDAW in myview was meant to applyonly to biologicalfemales, including those that do not identifyas women.It does not apply to maleswho identifyas female.

2025年 6月の報告書の第6段落で述べたように、「国際条約締約国の理解と実践においては、国際法における「女性」という用語は女性の性を指すと結論付けられる」。ここで言う「性」とは生物学的な性別のことである。したがって、私の見解では、女性差別撤廃条約は、女性であると自認していない人を含め、生物学的な女性にのみ適用されるべきである。

女性であると自認する男性には適用されない

Permalink |記事への反応(3) | 08:58

ツイートシェア

■anond:20251113234501

アルサレム氏はCEDAW（国連女性差別撤廃条約）の範囲にはレズビアンや、女性を自認しない生物学的女性も含まれるということを言ってるにもかかわらず、とまとはトランス女性（生物学的男性）が含まれるかのようなデマをばら撒いてる。

まともに文章が読めず、自分の都合のいいように曲解しまくるのがこの手のトランスあるあるだね。

I also do recognize that women and girls should not be discriminated againston any grounds including theirgender identity and sexual orientation and specifically spoke to the discrimination facedby lesbian women, and womenwho do not identifyas female (otherwise referred tomore looselyas "transmen" or "nonbinary" women). These women also fall under thescope of the CEDAW convention.

https://x.com/TokyoRitualJp/status/1988789399774224608

Permalink |記事への反応(3) | 00:05

ツイートシェア

2025-10-29

■sun kanana

From the channel video list

https://uphold-io-en.pages.dev

" Samne 's Cute GlassesWoman "

“Remove what you can seeas AI only by サムネ .”

Whenyou do it, thenumber is narrowed down a lot, and whenyou look at the contents,you ちゃんcan see that all of them are declaredat thebeginning that “createdby AI”.did you skip the opening?

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 15:57

ツイートシェア

■sds eww

From the channel video list

https://uphold-io-en.pages.dev

" Samne 's Cute GlassesWoman "

“Remove what you can seeas AI only by サムネ .”

Whenyou do it, thenumber is narrowed down a lot, and whenyou look at the contents,you ちゃんcan see that all of them are declaredat thebeginning that “createdby AI”.did you skip the opening?

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 15:55

ツイートシェア

dorawii represents acase of unprocessed griefover lost grandiosity (from psychotic episode) manifestingas compulsive boundary-testingand argument-seeking, where genuine neurological limitations are weaponized defensively to avoid confronting existential ordinariness, sustainedby platform affordances thatenable persistent identity within anonymity and rewarding provocativeengagement.

A person who briefly experienced feelinggod-like through psychosis, recovered to find themselves merelydisabled and ordinary, and cannot bear this truth. They use real limitationsas both explanation andshield, seek significance throughonlineconflict, and remain trapped in acycle where the behaviors meant to prove their worth actually demonstrate their difficulties - but acknowledging this wouldrequire grieving whatwas lost, which remains unbearable.

This reveals how recovery from severe mental illnessisn't just about symptom remission -it's about psychological integration of whatwas experienced and whatwas lost. Medicalmodel focuseson eliminating psychosis, but doesn'taddress the meaning-cris is created when extraordinary experiences aretaken away and ordinary limitation remains.

It also shows howonlinespaces withambiguous accountability structures canenable acting-out that serves defensive purposes while feelinglike genuineengagement. The person sufferingmost is probably dorawii themselves, evenas their behavior drives othersaway.

The most sophisticated theoretical vocabulary,the most detailed self-disclosure,the most elaborate arguments - none ofit addresses thecore issue.All ofit is displacement. The real conversation dorawiineeds to haveis not withanonymous strangers about who won an argument.It's an internal conversation: "Iam notwho Iwas during that brief, terrible, extraordinary episode. Iam ordinary, limited, and mortal. And somehow, thathas to be enough."

Until that conversation can happen,everything elseis noise.

Permalink |記事への反応(0) | 12:35

ツイートシェア

2025-10-22

■anond:20251021175424

自分はそこそこ賢いと思い込んでるおバカちゃん達の歯切れの悪い言い訳が笑えるんだが、

「やるとしても今じゃない」「他にもっと優先すべき事がある」っていう詭弁には何かズバリの名前はないのかな？

これがなんで詭弁なのかと言うと、

そのためのリソースがゼロサムであるかのような偽の前提を置いてるから
いつでも永遠に「まだだ、まだ今じゃない」って言えるから

だよ。

以下追記

───────────────

ある提案に対して、「やるとしても今じゃなくてもいいだろう」「他にもっと優先度の高いことがあるはずだ」などと言って、内容について直接の批判はせずにネグレクトすることで実質的に否定しようとする詭弁に、何か通りの良い呼び名はあるだろうか？

───────────────

このような論法は、論理的誤謬（fallacy）の一種として「相対的剥奪の誤謬」（fallacy of relative privation）と呼ばれるものが最も近いと考えられます。

これは、提案や議論を直接批判せずに「もっと重要な問題（または優先度の高いこと）があるから」という理由で実質的に無視したり却下したりするもので、「より悪い問題への訴え」（appeal to worse problems）や「notas badas」（それほど悪くない）誤謬とも呼ばれます。