Multiple Works Need Separate Pages Multiple versions or instalments of this work have been lumped into this page.Multiple Works Need Separate Pages, and this page needs to be turned into either a franchise page or a disambiguation page.

Mommie Dearest was a 1978 memoir written by Christina Crawford, depicting her physical and mental abuse at the hands of her adoptive mother, famed actressJoan Crawford. It was the book that spawned the equally famousFilm of the Book, withFaye Dunaway in the role of Joan Crawford.

To put it more bluntly and in more detail, the book pretty much destroyed the reputation of Joan Crawford in the eyes of the public, as far as the book's revelations about her systematic abuse of her children, Christina in particular. The book's vivid recounting of Joan's psychotic behavior and abuse of her children polarized Hollywood into camps of those who confirmed Christina's story (or acknowledge that the signs of the abuse were there and that no one said anything about it) and those who proclaimed that the novel was a revenge plot, designed by Christina to ruin her mother's name after finding out that she was being cut out of her mother's will and as a means to gain fame, as her own attempt to launch an acting career had fallen short.

The book can be seen as one of the first (and arguably most successful) of the genre of nasty tell-all biographies of stars from theGolden Age of Hollywood, told by their children. Others such as the kids ofMarlene Dietrich,Judy Garland,Henry Fonda,Loretta Young,Bing Crosby andBette Davis all tried to replicate the success with various results (the Bette Davis book flopped and was debunked, for example, but the books that Marlene Dietrich's and Bing Crosby's respective broods wrote did quite well).

The 1981 movie version of the book was an even bigger debacle: Faye Dunaway (who ironically had been praised by Crawford in print prior to her death and who even suggested that she should play her in the inevitable bio-film of Joan's life) was cast and Paramount marketed it as a serious bio-film. Sadly though, after numerous re-writes and an incompetent director whose previous directing experience was a handful of hammy melodramas, much of Joan Crawford's character development ended up missing, which turned her into a deranged cartoon character, and the abuse segments took on larger-than-life sadistic tones. By the end, even Christina Crawford (whose husband had a hand in producing the film) thought the film was too over-the-top. As such, Faye Dunaway came off as aLarge Ham, and the film picked up a huge word-of-mouth regarding it asan unintentional comedy, forcing the studio toRetool the marketing to focus on the over-the-top abuse. Sadly, it failed to save the box office take, though it secured itself as aCult Classic.

• Abusive Parents: Three guesses, no prizes.
• Adaptation Decay: The movie doesn't even acknowledge that Joan Crawford adopted two other children, Cathy and Cynthia. Interestingly, the two of them were left in Crawford's will.
• Berserk Button: Wire hangers strangely sets Joan Crawford off in the movie adaptation.
• Bitch in Sheep's Clothing: Joan and possibly Christina.
• Chewing the Scenery: Faye Dunaway mowing down the sets, props and co-stars in every scene she's in.
• Composite Character: In the movie, Greg is a combination of the various husbands Joan Crawford had, while the housekeeper is meant to represent several employees in Joan's house.
• Cute and Psycho: Joan Crawford, ifMommie Dearest is to be believed.
• Evil Matriarch: Joan Crawford, as depicted in both the book and the movie.
• Foreshadowing: The final lines of the movie, after Christina and her brother find out that their mother had disinherited them, suggest that Christina would truly have "the last word".
• Genre Popularizer: As mentioned, Christina Crawford's book started a slew of mean-spirited books written by children of famous actors about their parents' alleged abusive and loose behavior.
• Hair of Gold: Christina.
• Ham-to-Ham Combat: Christina vs. Joan before the latter attempts to strangle the former.
• How We Got Here: An almost metaphysical example; the film ends with Christina's decision to write a tell-all book about her mother, which in turn gets adapted into the very same movie the audience is watching.
• John Waters: Provided DVD commentary for the film.
• Large Ham: And how.Truth in Television too, as the real Crawford was said to be one in Real Life. Also, Faye Dunaway as Crawford in the film version.
• Misery Lit: Arguably one of the best and most influential examples.
• Muse Abuse: It inspired theBlue Oyster Cult songJoan Crawford Has Risen From The Grave, whose video is a farrago of images from the film.
• Never Speak Ill of the Dead: Subverted, as Christina claims she was cut off from Joan's will "for reasons best known to her."
• Nice Character, Mean Actor: The book claims that Joan was one of these.
• Off to Boarding School: As it happened to Christina Crawford.
• Panty Shot: A somewhat jarring one from Christina, when Joanattacks and chokes her.
• Precision F-Strike:"DON'T FUCK WITH ME, FELLAS! This ain't my first time at the rodeo."
• Punctuated! For! Emphasis!: "NO! WIRE! HANGERS! EVEEEEEER!!!"
  • Also, "I AM NOT! ONE OF YOUR FAAAAAAAAAAAANS!!!"
    • "Oh Joan, stop 'acting'." "IIIIII'MM! NOOT! ACTINNNNNNNGGGG!!!"
• Signature Line: "No wire hangers, ever!"
• Title Drop: Christina addresses her mom this way with the movie or book title of the same name.
• Traumatic Haircut: Joan in the movie forcibly cuts Christina's hair (while screaming at her) after catching her preening in Joan's mirror. "You spoiled it, just like I spoiled you."

• Work
• Multiple Works Need Separate Pages
• Film
• Golden Raspberry Award
• Mommie Dearest
• Non-Fiction Literature
• The Seventies
• Danny Peary Cult Movies List
• Films of the 1980s
• Films Based on Books