Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

gtl set and maps vs parallel_hashmap#27

Nosenzor started this conversation inGeneral
Discussion options

Hi Greg,
I've been a happyparallel_hashmapuser for a year or so. And now i want to usegtlfor the LRU memoizer. LRU memoizer is a super nice work, thank you ! I've tested on a mac and i could save a lot of computation time using the memoizer.
Then I've tested it on windows and MSVC is complaining aboutuint64_t umul128(uint64_t,uint64_t,uint64_t *) that is defined in bothparallel_hashmapandgtl.
I was thinking to remove parallel_hashmap to use onlygtl that also havehashmaps, i suspect they are the same map and set but i wanted a confirmation before doing that change.

You must be logged in to vote

Replies: 1 comment

Comment options

Thanks for the kind words@Nosenzor . I'm glad you like the LRU memoizer.
Yes, they are the same maps. If you are usingc++20 or above I do recommend usinggtl instead ofparallel-hashmap. Mosttly you just changephmap:: togtl::.

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Category
General
Labels
None yet
2 participants
@Nosenzor@greg7mdp

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp