General Articles, content Page handling User conduct Other
When reporting spam, please use the appropriate template(s): As a courtesy, please consider informing other editors if their actions are being discussed.
{{Link summary|example.com}}-- do not use "subst:" with this template -Do not include the "http://www." portion of theURL inside this template {{ IP summary }} - to report anonymous editors suspected of spamming:{{IP summary|127.0.0.1}} --- do not use "subst:" with this template {{ User summary }} - to report registered users suspected of spamming:{{User summary|Username}}-- do not use "subst:" with this template Also, please include links ("diffs" ) to sample spam edits.
Suspicious new articles[ edit ] List of reportshere . Remove transclusions when all finished to keep page readable.
Suspicious new articles (2026-01-24)[ edit ] 2026-01-24: Break 0[ edit ] 2026-01-24: Break 1[ edit ] 2026-01-24: Break 2[ edit ] 2026-01-24: Break 3[ edit ] 2026-01-24: Break 4[ edit ] 2026-01-24: Break 5[ edit ] 2026-01-24: Break 6[ edit ] 2026-01-24: Break 7[ edit ] Suspicious new articles (2026-01-07)[ edit ] 2026-01-07: Break 0[ edit ] 2026-01-07: Break 1[ edit ] 2026-01-07: Break 2[ edit ] 2026-01-07: Break 3[ edit ] 2026-01-07: Break 4[ edit ] 2026-01-07: Break 5[ edit ] 2026-01-07: Break 6[ edit ] Wouldn't usually come here for one addition by one new account, but given the on-going menuspam issue this might be worth a poke around with by people with Advanced Tools™. •a frantic turtle 🐢16:04, 27 January 2026 (UTC) [ reply ]
Cross-reference withWikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Bubli12#27_January_2026 . All the other accounts I dug up overlap with that SPI. They give us:I'll request global blacklisting of both.HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts? 18:59, 27 January 2026 (UTC) [ reply ] ETA the above, which I believe to be unrelated (and certainly stale, dating from early last year) but I have a massive need for completeness. •a frantic turtle 🐢16:27, 27 January 2026 (UTC) [ reply ]
Definitely related (see the Spamcheck report for the domain). I widened a rangeblock (to 103.174.194.0/23; ftr I didn't use CU find that) I'd already made to combat related spam.HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts? 19:53, 27 January 2026 (UTC) [ reply ] Blog spam. --Seawolf35 T --C 18:14, 28 January 2026 (UTC) [ reply ]
We also have and Spamcheck connects ~2026-61537-3 (on a completely different range). All blocked, domain added to BED.HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts? 19:48, 28 January 2026 (UTC) [ reply ] ~2026-59826-9 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · Edit filter search · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · blacklist hits · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Google · StopForumSpam ) has edited over 15 pages in the last day to have citations with a common author. I have included level 3 and 4 warnings but another half a dozen pages have been spammed since then. cluebots changes have also been reverted by the editor.NeedsGlasses (talk )23:42, 28 January 2026 (UTC) [ reply ]
— Newslinger talk 09:14, 30 January 2026 (UTC) [ reply ]
Added toWP:BED . — Newslinger talk 09:17, 30 January 2026 (UTC) [ reply ] User:Adeel6484 and strategymod.com[ edit ] Seethis edit . StrategyMod has nothing to do with the article it was added to.Cunard (talk )11:05, 2 February 2026 (UTC) [ reply ]
@Cunard I'm inclined to leave this one unless it's part of a pattern. Obviously if the domain or the user come to attention again, we'll be able to refer back to this report.HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts? 22:57, 2 February 2026 (UTC) [ reply ] That works. Thank you for reviewing.Cunard (talk )07:24, 4 February 2026 (UTC) [ reply ] User page spam. One edit wonder on spamcheck but listing here due to the amount of APK spam that goes on. --Seawolf35 T --C 15:22, 2 February 2026 (UTC) [ reply ]
The page claims to be a tv website but when visited it is a APK download. --Seawolf35 T --C 17:02, 2 February 2026 (UTC) [ reply ] @Seawolf35 the user is already blocked. I've added the domain to BED.HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts? 23:02, 2 February 2026 (UTC) [ reply ] Fwiw, they were blocked by Deb after I made this report. --Seawolf35 T --C 23:36, 2 February 2026 (UTC) [ reply ] Long-term spamming. Named accounts were from a while ago and temp accounts were very recent. --Seawolf35 T --C 18:35, 6 February 2026 (UTC) [ reply ]
@Seawolf35 I've blocked the accounts in case they come back and added the domain to BED.HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts? 20:34, 6 February 2026 (UTC) [ reply ]