| ThisWikiProject isbelieved to beinactive. Consider looking forrelated groups or ask for help at theTeahouse. If you wish to help, you may still join the group. Thisstatus should be changed if collaborativeactivity resumes. |
Welcome to theGo WikiProject. We are agroup dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of the game ofGo, known also asbaduk,igo, andweiqi.
Go is played on a grid of black lines (usually 19×19). The playing pieces, calledstones, are played on the intersections of the lines. | |
| Skills | Tactics,strategy,observation |
|---|---|

To expand and improve articles inCategory:Go (game), in particular adding diagrams and upgrading biographical pages and the coverage of go competitions around the world.
We should in particular discuss some format issues for different types of articles, romanization of names, how to tabulate results.
|
We have a list of project members, indicating any areas of particular interest. Please seethis subpage to view the list, or to add yourself.
Members may also display the followinguserbox on theirUser page, (taken fromTemplate:User WikiProject Go):
| This user is a participant inWikiProject Go. |
Go-players are most welcome to display the following userbox on their User page, (courtesy ofUser:Scepia):
| This user is aGo player. |
408 editors(verify) display this userbox as of July 2020.
Article alerts (watch)—articles for deletion, proposed deletions, requested moves, etc.—are listed below. This section may be empty if there are no alerts currently active (which is common for this WikiProject).
Articles for deletion
List of the most popular pages, updated monthly.
User:AlexNewArtBot/GoSearchResult (watch) lists newly created articles related to Go.
Any new articles that have an interesting or unusual fact in them should be suggested for theDid you know? box on theMain Page.
There is adiscussion page on theSensei's Library(SL) go wiki, designed to create interest in this project, and to provide a forum in which to discuss adaptation of material currently there on SL for WP.
Be warned that officially, Sensei's Library content is not compatible with Wikipedia content for raw copying - they use theOpen Content License (OPL), a permissive license, but one that unfortunately never had an "upgrade path" added to it to eithercc-by-sa orGFDL, which is what Wikipedia expects. That said, in practice, you can largely take from it with just minor rewriting (the differences are trivial and not one of intent) - just be warned that user-generated content like SL is not a "reliable source"WP:RS itself. (Seehttps://senseis.xmp.net/?SLCopyright ,https://senseis.xmp.net/?topic=1197 ,https://senseis.xmp.net/?Wikipedia%2FCopyDiscussion ).
for reference and consultation
Bot-generated statistics (on articles having the project banner{{WikiProject Go}} on their talk pages).
| Go articles by quality and importance | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality | Importance | ||||||
| Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total | |
| B | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 13 | ||
| C | 23 | 15 | 15 | 53 | |||
| Start | 1 | 26 | 65 | 111 | 203 | ||
| Stub | 5 | 55 | 204 | 5 | 269 | ||
| List | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 11 | |
| Category | 143 | 143 | |||||
| Disambig | 1 | 1 | |||||
| File | 2 | 2 | |||||
| Portal | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Project | 4 | 4 | |||||
| Template | 49 | 49 | |||||
| NA | 26 | 14 | 40 | ||||
| Other | 2 | 2 | |||||
| Assessed | 4 | 59 | 140 | 366 | 216 | 6 | 791 |
| Unassessed | 3 | 3 | |||||
| Total | 4 | 59 | 140 | 366 | 216 | 9 | 794 |
| WikiWork factors (?) | ω =2,892 | Ω = 5.36 | |||||
For more information see:
Wikipedia has guidelines concerning the notability of living people. A question sometimes asked is: How strong a Professional rank must aGo professional enjoy, to be considered notable by Wikipedia? A quick and easy answer to this is thatprofessional 4-dans (often denoted 4P) should be considered notable. This is because that level is the best estimate of a rank equivalent to aChess Grandmaster.
This is the usually-accepted andresearched opinion from an informed editor - lifelong Go and chess player (& WP admin.)User:Charles Matthews - that 4-dan pro and above [i.e. from 4-dan up to the highest (9-dan)] are on a par with chess grandmasters, hence notable in the Go world.
There is a separatesection on the project Talk page to discuss whether we should change the above threshold; please obviously feel free to add your own views to others', there.
The strength of players should be compared to others in the same time period. By selecting threshold of 4d you would eliminate players from less strong countries e.g. Europe nowadays. An that seems to be unreasonable because these players play an important role in theirs countries or are important form the historical point of view. Theses players are of interest for many not only European players.To1al (talk)06:05, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In years gone by, before some of us joined Wikiproject Go, various editors commendably addedBLP articles for many renowned Go Professionals. These editors' work is much appreciated. However, in some cases there were insufficientReferences,External links andinline citations added. As Wikipedia has, quite rightly, tightened up on these aspects, we are faced with a certain backlog of work in this area.
Editors looking for references to add to these BLPs are sometimes unaware of the richest sources for such links. Thus, the following sources are suggested as a help. Please add to them if you know of further ones.
E.g. to get results for the 9-danShuchi Kubouchi -like this, what we can do is:
E.g. to get results for the 9-danCho Chikun, like this:http://gobase.org/information/players/?pp=Cho+Chikun, what we can do is:
E.g. to get results from theNihon Ki-in for the 9-danCho Chikun, (http://www.nihonkiin.or.jp/player/htm/ki000004.htm), what we can do is:
E.g. to get results from theAmerican Go Association for the 6-dan playerMingjiu Jiang, what we can do is:
E.g. to get results from the GoGameWorld for the 9-dan playerYamashita Keigo, what we can do is: