Suspected sockpuppets

• Mike2A-MD (talk⁺ ·tag ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·spi block ·block log ·CA ·CheckUser(log) ·investigate ·cuwiki)
• User compare reportAuto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Both recently made very similar edits to theKatie Couric in the midst of a content dispute. For example,[1][2]. Note the time stamps, which are close together.

Looking at their past histories, they also both editedGun laws in Maryland in 2015 around the same time. The content of those edits were not similar, but the combination of interests in Maryland's gun laws and Katie Couric combined with the timing makes thisquack a bit.[3][4]

Both accounts also registered March 2015. I don't think this needs a CU. ~Rob^Talk15:27, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. SeeDefending yourself against claims.

• CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk - Please, compare those two accounts.Vanjagenije(talk)15:42, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• The accounts are technically Unrelated.Mike V •Talk15:49, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Admin action needed - Looking atSpecial:Contribs/Mike2A-MD, it appears Mike2A is a sleeper account Jbusch8899 uses when need be. All of Mike2A's edits (only 8, though spread over 14 months) are on articles Jbusch8899 has edited in times similar to Mike2A's. Example diffs (as provided by filer):[5][6]. Therefore, notwithstanding the CU result, Looks like a duck to me.. Blocks requested: indefinite for Mike2A-MD, two weeks (or other term at admin discretion) for Jbusch8899.Kevin (akaL235 ·t ·c)13:39, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• BlockedMike2A-MD (talk ·contribs) indef.Nakon04:36, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Noindexed pages