Requesting that deleted content be "userfied", i.e., restored as adraft, touserspace or emailed to you; this way, the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listedhere). Be clear as to which namespace is intended, when requesting the restoration of a deleted article.
Content deletedafter discussion indeletion processes may in some cases be provided to you, but that deleted aftercontroversial discussions will not – this requiresdeletion review instead.Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided.
Do not request that pages or media deleted under speedy deletion criteriaF7,F9,F11,U5,U7,A7,A9,A11,G3,G4,G10,G11,G12, orG15 be undeleted here.
I am requesting undeletion of User:Chloe100/sandbox, which was deleted under G11 (unambiguous advertising).The deleted page was a user sandbox draft and not a live article. While the original draft required tone revisions to meet Wikipedia’s neutral point of view, it was not intended as advertising and can be rewritten without fundamental changes.The subject of the draft meets Wikipedia’s notability guidelines through significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources, including established national and industry publications and government records.I understand the concerns raised under G11 and am requesting restoration to my user sandbox only so that I may rewrite the draft to fully comply with encyclopedic standards before any future submission.Thank you for your consideration.— Precedingunsigned comment added byChloe100 (talk •contribs)16:54, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – this page was deleted as ablatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as avehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is anotable topic, e.g., multiplereliable,secondary, published sources that are entirelyindependent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then aneutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. You could have asked the deleting adminJimfbleak to reconsider, however I see you have decided to recreate instead anyway.KylieTastic (talk)20:41, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
SamyatiliusDone – as adraft orArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.KylieTastic (talk)20:13, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Please restore the deleted article "Northants Baseball Club" to my userspace so I can work on improving it. I would like it placed at: User:Jack/Northants_Baseball_Club. —CaptainHisDudeness (talk)18:20, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
CaptainHisDudenessNot done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after adeletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northants Baseball Club, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact theadministrator who closed the discussion,Explicit (talk·contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made atdeletion review. We are willing to userfy some requests however it would appear unlikely that you could overcome the issues raised in the AfD - i.e. this is just a local club that plays for a league that has not even shown to be notable.KylieTastic (talk)20:20, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
FloridaArmyDone – as adraft orArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.KylieTastic (talk)20:25, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
FloridaArmyDone – as adraft orArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.KylieTastic (talk)20:26, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
FloridaArmyDone – as adraft orArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.KylieTastic (talk)20:28, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
FloridaArmyDone – as adraft orArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.KylieTastic (talk)20:29, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
FloridaArmyDone – as anArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.KylieTastic (talk)20:30, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
FloridaArmyDone – as adraft orArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.KylieTastic (talk)20:31, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
FloridaArmyDone – as adraft orArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.KylieTastic (talk)20:33, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
FloridaArmyDone – as adraft orArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.KylieTastic (talk)20:36, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as adraft orArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.@Jp060183:Graeme Bartlett (talk)00:02, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
As i understand it, the reason for deletion was that the editor could not find information on the above mentioned band. I find it unsettling that articles can be removed because an editor is unable to properly research a topic. I think any user would find this unacceptable.
This band most definitely existed. They released three cds/lps, were included on several compilations, were featured in national publications, and were together for ten years, touring extensively on North America's eastern seaboard. There were conflicts with a British band of the same name, who were formed AFTER the Canadian band. During the existence of the band's Wikipedia page, there were several instances of malicious edits to the page by an unknown user. These malicious edits included profanity and slander about members of the band. These malicious edits contained spurious information designed to confuse readers and anger the band. This was obviously someone's idea of a troll, intended to provoke a reaction. Was this part of the reason the page was removed?
Can the deleted page be restored? If not, what can i do to ensure that the article will not be deleted again if i choose to repost it?
I know this is minor issue in the grand scheme of things but it is important to the band that page is restored.
Thanks for your time, i look forward to your reply. Have a great day.
Done – as a draft that was deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, thedraft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in thearticle mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving:{{subst:submit}}. -MPGuy2824 (talk)05:29, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as a draft that was deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, thedraft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in thearticle mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving:{{subst:submit}}. -MPGuy2824 (talk)05:31, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as a draft that was deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, thedraft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in thearticle mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving:{{subst:submit}}. -MPGuy2824 (talk)05:32, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I was looking exactly for this draft. I plan on expanding it further and submitting it for review later. I do not know if the procedure allows restoring it into my user space, but this would be ideal, as it it will alleviate the time pressure. A big advantage of writing encyclopedia is the glacial pace at which an editor can operate (I have only tangential interest in the subject, my typicalmodus operandi here). I promise to return it into draftspace for review when finished.Викидим (talk)05:54, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as a draft that was deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, thedraft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in thearticle mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving:{{subst:submit}}. -MPGuy2824 (talk)05:37, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as a draft that was deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, thedraft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in thearticle mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving:{{subst:submit}}. -MPGuy2824 (talk)05:39, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
SokolokondoDone – as anArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. as you had recreated I have undeleted the old version into the history for reference.KylieTastic (talk)09:35, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
This page should not be speedily deleted under CSD A7 or CSD G11 because the subject is supported by independent, reliable sources and the article is capable of being improved to meet encyclopedic standards.
The article cites independent sources that identify Dakaractu and discuss related context, including Jeune Afrique (regarding the founder) and Courrier International (listing/identifying the outlet), as well as additional independent reporting that references Dakaractu journalists. 
If any wording is perceived as promotional, I will revise it (e.g., removing subjective terms such as “established” / “regularly cited” and removing outdated traffic claims), which is a cleanup issue rather than a basis for speedy deletion. —Gnomoy (talk)09:45, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
From the talk page before deletion i tagged previously @Praxidicae, in fact, I managed to improve the cotent while adding new international independent additional sources.Gnomoy (talk)09:47, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Glane23Done – as adraft orArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.KylieTastic (talk)14:55, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
~2026-78581-9Done – as anArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.KylieTastic (talk)15:41, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
ThrileyDone – as adraft orArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.KylieTastic (talk)19:14, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
ThrileyDone – as adraft orArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.KylieTastic (talk)19:15, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Draft:Gustavo José Fernando Bolívar de Jesús Illingworth Baquerizo
PrinceAzuka134Done – as anArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.KylieTastic (talk)22:52, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as anArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -MPGuy2824 (talk)11:02, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as anArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -MPGuy2824 (talk)11:04, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as anArticles for creation (AfC) submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that saysSubmit the draft for review!. -MPGuy2824 (talk)11:05, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
~2026-79697-1 Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission.Draft space is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's articlemainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. This looks likely to be an auto-bioigraphy, are you the subject?KylieTastic (talk)13:25, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Direttore CIMEADone – as anArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.KylieTastic (talk)13:30, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
BronMeatDone – as adraft orArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.KylieTastic (talk)17:00, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after adeletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole Junkermann (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact theadministrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made atdeletion review. – Muboshgu (talk)22:20, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Y Draftified the AfD version, and it has to go through AfC. There was another version after the AfD, which was deleted as G7, and I have not restored to that. Although one comment at your2025 DRV suggested that you start from scratch, I believe the material at the restored version can help you. Jay 💬08:59, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
RedPatchDone – as adraft orArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.KylieTastic (talk)22:46, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
G13 deleted draft I want to work on. I found sources to establish notability. Thanks :) --not-cheesewhisk3rs ≽^•⩊•^≼ ∫ (pester)21:45, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Not-cheesewhisk3rs:Done – as anArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk)22:04, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Muboshgu SO... I don't know what I expected but that draft is terrible, and I'd rather start from scratch. Could you please delete it again as I'm definitely not using that as a start? Sorry for wasting your time. --not-cheesewhisk3rs ≽^•⩊•^≼ ∫ (pester)22:08, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Article was deleted in 2008 as a "Very short article providing little or no context". If the article was about the board game originally published in Germany, then I would like the opportunity to work on it, even if it seems like it would take a lot of work to fix it up. I don't mind. Thank you. :) —BOZ (talk)22:00, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
DareshMohanDone – as anArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.KylieTastic (talk)22:44, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Draft:Untitled Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes sequel
@Crafterstar:Done – as adraft orArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.BD2412T01:35, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Crafterstar:Done – as adraft orArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.BD2412T01:36, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Crafterstar:Done – as adraft orArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.BD2412T01:37, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Crafterstar:Not doneThor 5 already exists as a title of a subject in Wikipedia, so any new draft should be created at a disambiguated title. The few words of text in the deleted draft, substantially less than the content already atThor: Love and Thunder#Future, are not worth restoring merely for the purpose of moving that page to a new title.BD2412T01:42, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Crafterstar:Done – as adraft orArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.BD2412T01:37, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Crafterstar:Done – as adraft orArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.BD2412T01:38, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Crafterstar:Done – as adraft orArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.BD2412T01:38, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Yesterday I submitted a different draft, on this same company. It appears that very recently someone else had created a draft on the same subject. The deletion log shows this: G7: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page. Because I recently worked on a new draft for this, I am keen to see what the last one was. —LateFatherKarma (talk)12:33, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@LateFatherKarma: I would be very curious to know how you came to writing this draft covering almost all of the same points of information as the acknowledged paid-editing previously deleted draft.BD2412T13:55, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I had made a commitment to try writing an article a while ago and wanted to honour that. After that, I looked at a page on Wikipedia where people were making article suggestions and this was one of them. I can't be sure, but it looks as though this draft was created around the time I saw a comment suggesting it be created. I had some awareness of them, because about 3-4 years ago I was looking for a quiet appliance. On Wednesday I started looking into them. Upon asking a question on Teahouse, after submitting the draft, the person who reviewed it highlighted concerns due to this draft, which is why I requested to view it. I am not a paid editor, have no connection to this company, was not aware of this draft. I do not receive money from any business or organisation and have not for a very, very long time (paid work became almost impossible for me, for about 15-16 years now in fact).LateFatherKarma (talk)15:01, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I have had a quick look today but can't find it. I 100% saw this suggestion on Wikipedia some weeks ago. I have sunk a lot of my personal time on this. Unlike some (according to what they write on here) no one is paying me for my contributions nor do I want them to. After defending my actions elsewhere and being at the stage where I actually want nothing further to do with this, I am past being willing to search that out on the site. My editing history shows a very different pattern to this particular drafts author.LateFatherKarma (talk)17:29, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I assume good faith as to your involvement, but since the editor of the previous draft disclosed that they were paid for their work, that raises the concern that whoever contemporaneously added this to a page on Wikipedia where people were making article suggestions was likely also engaged in paid editing, which makes it important to determine who did so in the first place.BD2412T18:19, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
TssubodhDone – as anArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.KylieTastic (talk)15:53, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Stanloona2020:Done – as anArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.BD2412T18:10, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Draft:John Stewardson Memorial Fellowship in Architecture
@MLKArchitect:Done – as anArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.BD2412T19:22, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Thriley:Done – as adraft orArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.BD2412T02:00, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Thriley:Done – as adraft orArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.BD2412T02:01, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Gabanitin:Done – as anArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.BD2412T01:59, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Thriley:Done – as adraft orArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.BD2412T02:01, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Thriley:Done – as adraft orArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.BD2412T02:01, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Thriley:Done – as adraft orArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.BD2412T02:01, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Burnwithgemlikeflame:Done – as anArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.BD2412T01:59, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Thriley:Done – as adraft orArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.BD2412T02:02, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Thriley:Done – as adraft orArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.BD2412T02:03, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Sczipo:Done – as adraft orArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.BD2412T02:03, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Drachels:Done – as anArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.BD2412T02:04, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Ronanlegallo:Done – as adraft orArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.BD2412T02:04, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Yadsalohcin:Done – as anArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.BD2412T02:05, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Owenskha:Done – as anArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.BD2412T03:46, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Willow2023:Done – as anArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.BD2412T03:47, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm requesting undeletion of this draft (Which was deleted underWP:CSD#G13) so that I can retrieve sourcing or any worthwhile content from it (if there is any) for potential future articles focused on either it orFortnite live events as a whole. If possible, restore the draft somewhere in my userspace (or just copy it over) at a location such asUser:NegativeMP1/The End (Fortnite), since it may get repurposed and I'd like to have it available without risk of deletion if I don't get to it for a while. Thank you.λNegativeMP103:20, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@NegativeMP1:Done – as anArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.BD2412T03:47, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as adraft orArticles for creation submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.@Vivekanand1863:Graeme Bartlett (talk)14:08, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
AlexzhivilDone – as anArticles for creation (AfC) submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that saysSubmit the draft for review!.KylieTastic (talk)14:40, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
BronMeatDone – as anArticles for creation (AfC) submission deleted underCSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that saysSubmit the draft for review!.KylieTastic (talk)16:47, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]