Draft:Julian Alturas (edit |talk |history |links |watch |logs)​

Unsourced BLP that has been submitted multiple times over the last 13 months; I am counting it as unsourced as the 3 'references' make no mention of Alturas. There are further problems with this as well. It has always been written extremely promotionally (e.g. "This achievement underscores his dedication and commitment to his goals, showcasing a disciplined work ethic that extends beyond the realm of entertainment. But the pull of his acting dreams remained strong") and I think it's dangerously close to aWP:G11, the only thing stopping me doing this is the fact that it's long-standing. It also appears to be a hoax. The article falsely claims that Alturas participated in Big Brother andhis IMDb page says that this was thePinoy Big Brother: Teen Edition 4, which I believe to be completely false. Actually, I believe the whole draft to be a work of fiction and the only thing preventing theWP:G3 tag is the fact that it's long-standing.Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)}12:19, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. While we shouldn't rush to delete drafts, tedentious resubmittal and unsourced BLP issues on this one make deletion the right choice.Martinp (talk)17:17, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as puffery - The entirePersonal Life section should be deleted as puffery, which will leave nothing substantive.Robert McClenon (talk)21:28, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. My favourite part wasHis story is a compelling narrative of resilience, ambition, and the pursuit of dreams, a story that's just beginning to unfold. The cameras are rolling, and Julian Alturas is ready for his close-up. Pure spam.Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)}21:47, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That is the end, and sums it all up. When I see anything like that, I read the whole page critically to see if there is anything worth keeping, and often there isn't. I have written an essay,Marketing Buzzspeak, about such language. In 2025, such language is sometimes thought to be a sign ofartificial intelligence, butLLMs write this way because they are imitating the way marketeers have written since long before the invention ofartificial intelligence.Robert McClenon (talk)04:36, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Once you deleted the puffery, there would be practically nothing left.ScrabbleTiles (talk)07:43, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]