Full current month log

Keep

Delist

The following is an archived discussion of afeatured list removal nomination.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or inWikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list wasdelisted byPresN viaFACBot (talk) 15:04 9 December 2025[1]FACBot (talk)23:35, 9 December 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Notified:WikiRedactor,WikiProject Television

Seasons should be articles, not lists. Nomination per consensusUser:Easternsahara_{review this}04:36, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delist. Season articles are not lists. If they appear as such it means that they are missing large amount of content. Either way, it can't be a Featured or FL content.Gonnym (talk)09:16, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delist per project consensus, though I feel the article is in a good state given that, as a reality show, certain sections (particularly for production) won't be developed in the same way.RunningTiger123 (talk)06:15, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist per project consensus.Bgsu98(Talk)12:36, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted. --PresN15:04, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Closing note: Thiscandidate has beenremoved, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please seeWP:FLC/ar, and leave the{{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until thebot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of afeatured list removal nomination.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or inWikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list wasdelisted byPresN viaFACBot (talk) 15:05 9 December 2025[2]FACBot (talk)23:35, 9 December 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Notified:Example user,Example WikiProject

The discussion for this nomination is happeninghere. Do not leave comments on this page.Bgsu98(Talk)20:18, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted. --PresN15:05, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Closing note: Thiscandidate has beenremoved, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please seeWP:FLC/ar, and leave the{{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until thebot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of afeatured list removal nomination.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or inWikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list wasdelisted byPresN viaFACBot (talk) 15:05 9 December 2025[3]FACBot (talk)23:35, 9 December 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Notified:Example user,Example WikiProject

The discussion for this nomination is happeninghere. Do not leave comments on this page.Bgsu98(Talk)20:19, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted. --PresN15:05, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Closing note: Thiscandidate has beenremoved, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please seeWP:FLC/ar, and leave the{{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until thebot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of afeatured list removal nomination.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or inWikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list wasdelisted byPresN viaFACBot (talk) 15:05 9 December 2025[4]FACBot (talk)23:35, 9 December 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Notified:Example user,Example WikiProject

The discussion for this nomination is happeninghere. Do not leave comments on this page.Bgsu98(Talk)20:19, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted. --PresN15:05, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Closing note: Thiscandidate has beenremoved, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please seeWP:FLC/ar, and leave the{{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until thebot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of afeatured list removal nomination.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or inWikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list wasdelisted byPresN viaFACBot (talk) 15:04 9 December 2025[5]FACBot (talk)23:35, 9 December 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Notified:Rambo's Revenge

Continuing with TV season nominations (seethe recent FLRC log), this article is being nominated for FLRC as consensus has shifted to promoting these lists through GAN/FAC. Included in this bulk nomination are seasons 2, 3, and 4.Bgsu98(Talk)20:14, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delist per consensus, episode summaries are not long enough, crew section is partially uncited.User:Easternsahara_{review this}01:10, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delist per project consensus. Also, from purely a quality standpoint, the articles are generally not that comprehensive, especially when it comes to production (repeating the list of cast members doesn't count as a good production section). Links to related FLRCs:season 2,season 3,season 4.RunningTiger123 (talk)06:11, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted. --PresN15:04, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Closing note: Thiscandidate has beenremoved, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please seeWP:FLC/ar, and leave the{{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until thebot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of afeatured list removal nomination.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or inWikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list wasdelisted byPresN viaFACBot (talk) 14:10 9 December 2025[6]FACBot (talk)23:35, 9 December 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Notified:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy/Solar System task force

I am nominating this for featured list removal because this is not a list. It is a decent article, but should go through GA or FA instead. Most of this article consists of prose, with one list at the end.Bgsu98(Talk)19:37, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support, I think that the history section can probably be expanded, perhaps with some more information on triton. also think its not very much a listUser:Easternsahara_{review this}02:51, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Although this (and the sibling Jupiter nomination) have not gotten a great deal of attention, the consensus does appear to be that they are not lists. I've also asked off-wiki on Discord for opinions, and while that doesn't count in terms of reviewing and the discussants didn't show up here to make a formal comment, none of the editors thought it counted as a list, which is the central question here. As such, despite the low participation, I'm going to close this as delisted. --PresN14:09, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:PresN, I will nominate the others in this series (Uranus, Saturn) since there is agreement that they do not qualify as lists.Bgsu98(Talk)14:45, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bgsu98: Sounds good, I'll leave them open for a little while to ensure no one comes in with a dissenting opinion (like I do with the media season lists), but they'll probably end up in the same place for the same reason. --PresN15:12, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Closing note: Thiscandidate has beenremoved, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please seeWP:FLC/ar, and leave the{{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until thebot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of afeatured list removal nomination.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or inWikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list wasdelisted byPresN viaFACBot (talk) 14:09 9 December 2025[7]FACBot (talk)23:35, 9 December 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Notified:RandomCritic,Kwamikagami,WikiProject Astronomy

I am nominating this for featured list removal because the prose in this 'list' completely outnumbers the list by orders of magnitude, this is probably Featured Article or at least Good Article worthy, but definitely not a FL due to failing the list part of the criteria. 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩04:34, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Other concerns that I have with this list is that the entire first paragraph of theMoons of Jupiter#List section is unreferenced. Various parts of theMoons of Jupiter#Exploration section are also unreferenced. In addition, the "Visual observations" and "Photographic and spacecraft observations" are both quite short and break up the flow of the text. According to the MOS, these should probably be merged for better flow.Moons of Jupiter#Naming the third paragraph is quite short, and should be merged and it also uncited. The images are also not accesible as there aren't altexts for them. The second half of theMoons of Jupiter#Characteristics section is also uncited. There isn't a table header for screen reader accessibility either. Also note that this probably has the possibility for expansion, and a lot of the sources which this article depends heavily on could be updated. Keep in mind if all of these things are resolved, my point about the format still stands.🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩03:55, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For similar reasons I would also like to nominate the following lists:Moons of Saturn,Moons of Uranus,Moons of Neptune 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩11:38, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That we allow multi-nominations for media season lists while we work through them is a special, agreed upon case; this nomination cannot cover multiple lists. --PresN11:44, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I understand. 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩03:55, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: the 97-row table is scrollable; if you turn that off so that it can fill out vertically (and horizontally), the prose to table ratio is about 60%/40%, or 55/45 if you make the font full-sized. Also note that you have to actually notify the people/projects that you list above, not just put their names here; I did not see any evidence that you did. --PresN11:42, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think the list part of the article is rather overshadowed by its other things, which it would be incomplete without. Perhaps a list sub-article could be broken out but I do not think that this currently is a format "that lends itself to list format". Also thank you for pointing out that I have not notified people, but I did notifyRandomCritic andKwamikagami. Although I did not initially notify the WikiProject, I havedone so now. 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩03:55, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Remove. This is a great article, but not a good list. I agree that it may be worth considering nomination as a featured article. The same applies toMoons of Saturn,Moons of Uranus andMoons of Neptune, even if we may need to discuss those separately. Must we though? These lists are so similar, I kind of support Easternsahara's wish to discuss them in bulk, even if that's not technically possible. I don't want to be forced to have the same discussion four times.Renerpho (talk)19:24, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Although this (and the Neptune nomination) have not gotten a great deal of attention, the consensus does appear to be that they are not lists. I've also asked off-wiki on Discord for opinions, and while that doesn't count in terms of reviewing and the discussants didn't show up here to make a formal comment, none of the editors thought it counted as a list, which is the central question here. As such, despite the low participation, I'm going to close this as delisted. --PresN14:09, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Closing note: Thiscandidate has beenremoved, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please seeWP:FLC/ar, and leave the{{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until thebot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of afeatured list removal nomination.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or inWikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list wasdelisted byPresN viaFACBot (talk) 15:05 9 December 2025[8]FACBot (talk)23:35, 9 December 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Notified:Example user,Example WikiProject

The discussion for this nomination is happeninghere. Do not leave comments on this page.Bgsu98(Talk)23:44, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted. --PresN15:05, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Closing note: Thiscandidate has beenremoved, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please seeWP:FLC/ar, and leave the{{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until thebot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of afeatured list removal nomination.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or inWikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list wasdelisted byPresN viaFACBot (talk) 15:05 9 December 2025[9]FACBot (talk)23:35, 9 December 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Notified:Example user,Example WikiProject

The discussion for this nomination is happeninghere. Do not leave comments on this page.Bgsu98(Talk)23:43, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted. --PresN15:05, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Closing note: Thiscandidate has beenremoved, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please seeWP:FLC/ar, and leave the{{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until thebot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of afeatured list removal nomination.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or inWikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list wasdelisted byPresN viaFACBot (talk) 15:05 9 December 2025[10]FACBot (talk)23:35, 9 December 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Notified:Example user,Example WikiProject

The discussion for this nomination is happeninghere. Do not leave comments on this page.Bgsu98(Talk)23:42, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted. --PresN15:05, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Closing note: Thiscandidate has beenremoved, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please seeWP:FLC/ar, and leave the{{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until thebot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of afeatured list removal nomination.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or inWikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list wasdelisted byPresN viaFACBot (talk) 15:04 9 December 2025[11]FACBot (talk)23:35, 9 December 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Notified:Pedro thy master

Continuing with TV season nominations (seethe recent FLRC log), this article is being nominated for FLRC as consensus has shifted to promoting these lists through GAN/FAC. Included in this bulk nomination are seasons 4, 5, and 8.Bgsu98(Talk)23:39, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delist per project consensus. Seasons 1 and 4 are fairly solid from a quality standpoint; seasons 5 and 8 could use a polish before any consideration at GAN.RunningTiger123 (talk)04:01, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – links to other FLRCs:season 4,season 5,season 8.RunningTiger123 (talk)04:03, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist per nom.JHD0919 (talk)21:02, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delist. Season articles are not lists. If they look like a list then they are a poorly written article. Either way, not Featured.Gonnym (talk)19:59, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delist per consensusUser:Easternsahara_{review this}04:51, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted. --PresN15:04, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Closing note: Thiscandidate has beenremoved, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please seeWP:FLC/ar, and leave the{{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until thebot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.