My second Vice President Electoral History list, Dan Quayle has participated in 3ish primary elections and 6 general elections. A much less extensive set than my previous FLC but still a long career none the less. I would like to thankBremps for comments on the Peer review andJoeM3120 for creating the page back in 2013. I hope to continue this series of VPEH soon.Olliefant (she/her)13:38, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"He and Bushran for reelection were defeated in the 1992 presidential election by Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton and Tennessee Senator Al Gore." There appears to be a missing transition somewhere in there.Done
What was Quayle up to before running for the U.S. House of Representatives? Did he not serve at the state level, or do these articles only focus on national elections? I cannot remember from your last article (on Joe Biden, right?). Even if the U.S. House race was his first election, maybe a brief explanation of where he came from prior to that first election could provide some background.
Okay, I see now that he was the general manager of a newspaper. Perhaps some mention of this could be put at the beginning of this section, but leave the details about how his work in newspapers helped him in the general election where you have it.Done
"In 1978, Quayleran for reelection he won the Republican nomination unopposed..." Another missing transition.Done
"Quayle's aids..." I believe they'reaides.
"Quayle received almost twice as many votes as Waldaand winning a second term." That should either be "and won" or ", winning".Done
"Additionally, Bush washoping "balance the ticket" geographically..." Another missing transition.Done
"Additionally, Bush was hoping "balance the ticket" geographically and selecting Quayle, a midwesterner, would help him do so." Perhaps clarify that Bush believed that selecting Quayle would help him... Otherwise it comes off as speculation.Done
"Bentsen, a friend of Kennedy's," I don't believe you need the 's.Done
"Quayle decided to run, because he felt that Bayh's liberal views did not reflect the political positions of Indianans and that they led to poor economic results." - this and any similar statements should be in the form "Quayle said he decided to run because", as we don't know if that's true or just a campaign position.
The 1988 presidential election table has Dukakis with 0 electoral votes, but he got 111.
I adjusted the wording across the page however for the second point. The data in the table has 111 for the EV count but its displaying 0. I think this is due to the inclusion of an EFN next to the number. I don't know how to fix it without removing the EFNOlliefant (she/her)22:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"Quayle began his political career in 1976 by unseating incumbent Democratic Representative J. Edward Roush" - previous paragraph says 1977
The previous paragraph says he took office in 1977, the election was held in 1976.
Fair enough, I forgot that the US system is somewhat different to what I am used to here in the UK where the winner of an election basically takes up their post literally as soon as the result is announced --ChrisTheDude (talk)20:15, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"Quayle upset three term incumbent" => "Quayle upset three-term incumbent"Done
"chosen by then-Vice President George H. W. Bush, to serve as his" - no need for a comma thereDone
"He and Bush ran for reelection were but defeated" - huh? I think you mean "He and Bush ran for reelection but were defeated"Done
Also, does "re-election" not have a hyphen in US English?
"In 1976, Quayle, then a general manager of the Huntington Herald-Press" - newspaper names are usually written in italicsDone
"The South Bend Tribune criticized" - same hereDone
"Quayle told the The South Bend Tribune" - and here :-)Done
"would be able to effectively attack Democratic presidential nominee, Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis" => "would be able to effectively attack the Democratic presidential nominee, Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis"
"replacing Quayle as his running-mate in his expected 1992 reelection." => "replacing Quayle as his running-mate in his expected 1992 reelection campaign"Done
"was seen as a surprise to many pundits" = > "was seen as a surprise by many pundits"Done
The "Notes" section is empty so I see no reason for it to be thereDone
This table checks 10 passages from throughout the article (20.0% of 50 total passages).These passages contain 12 inline citations (17.6% of 68 in the article). Generated with theVeracity user script.Bgsu98(Talk)15:55, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Reference #
Letter
Source
Archive
Status
Notes
Democrat J. Edward Roush. Quayle stated that part of his decision to run was because he felt there was a need for congressional reform, labeling Roush's long career as part of the problem.
In 1978, Darrel Christian, writing for the Associated Press, believed that Quayle would use a 1978 House victory to "springboard" a future run for one of Indiana's Senate seats.
Note:Associated Press doesn't need to be italicized in this sentence.
In the primary election, he faced Roger Marsh. Marsh was a harsh critic of Quayle, leading to backlash from within the Indiana Republican Party. Due to this, Quayle was considered the favorite to receive the nomination.
During a 2016 interview with Indianapolis Monthly, Quayle explained that he believed he was selected due to his age and his role in writing the Job Training Partnership Act of 1982.
The article is behind a paywall; change the access notation to subscription required in the citation.
Ultimately, on August 19, 1992, Quayle and Bush were renominated at the 1992 Republican National Convention. Bush received 2,166 delegates, and Quayle was nominated through a voice vote.
However, some of his aides told The Washington Post that both Quayle and his wife Marilyn felt that even if he won in New Hampshire and Iowa, he could not clinch the nomination due to being outfunded by other candidates and dropped out.
As far as I can tell, the source does not confirm the last part of the statement ("due to being outfunded..."). Additionally, that last tag ("and dropped out") does not fit in this context. Recommend a slight rewrite.
Closing note: Thiscandidate has beenpromoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please seeWP:FLC/ar, and leave the{{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until thebot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
I've been updating this list for a couple of years, so I figured it should be my first individual FL nomination. As far as I know, this is the first Intangible Cultural Heritage list to be nominated as well. I have been adding descriptions to each element and greatly improving the list for several months, and now I believe it is complete and meets the FL criteria. The review process will probably take a while as this is a rather long list, but any suggestions and improvements are welcome.Shwabb1⟨taco⟩16:25, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Very brief comments but could you add to what the national register and Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity do. I am thinking of descriptions similar to those in the WHS lists. 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩12:36, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean exactly. Similarly to the WHS lists, the lead defines Intangible Cultural Heritage, and then the following paragraph mentions that the National Register safeguards these elements on the national level. Do you want me to expand these descriptions or were you thinking of something else?Shwabb1⟨taco⟩16:33, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Do items have to be inscribed on the national register to be recognized by UNESCO, and what specific criteria (LIke "UNESCO lists sites under ten criteria; each entry must meet at least one of the criteria. Criteria i through vi are cultural, and vii through x are natural" from Ukranian whs list) are there to being inscribed on each of the lists? 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩03:16, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"The Ministry of Culture of Ukraine has also formed the National Register ... which is required by the Convention for the further nomination of these elements to the UNESCO lists" – so inscription on the National Register precedes the nomination to the UNESCO lists. ICH elements don't have to meet one or more criteria from a certain list to be inscribed, unlike World Heritage Sites. Instead they have much more rigidsets of criteria, which in my opinion are self-explanatory (e.g., for the Urgent Safeguarding List, an element must fit the definition of ICH, must be endangered, the country must attempt to safeguard it, it should be practiced within the nominating country, etc). I can add these in a footnote if you think it's necessary to include this info, though I think it's somewhat redundant.Shwabb1⟨taco⟩06:07, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah you could add them to footnotes, and on the same subject the footnotes in this article are quite large. You should think about integrating them into the main text of the article perH:FN Thanks, 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩04:54, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm still not convinced on the necessity of adding this. These criteria are similar to the ones necessary for World Heritage Sites that arenot elaborated upon in WHS lists (such as proper management and safeguarding, and a high enough level of authenticity and integrity). Now that I look at the ICH criteria again, I believe they're already mentioned in the lead (the definition of ICH, the facts that these elements are protected and nominated by individual countries that maintain their own national registers) and subsections under each list (that the Representative List aims to represent the country worldwide, the Urgent Safeguarding list is for endangered elements, and the Register of Good Safeguarding Practices accredits programs and projects that safeguard ICH). I believe there are no major omissions from UNESCO's ICH criteria in the text.
As for the footnotes - do you have any specific ones in mind? I believe they generally contain information that is too technical to include in the text or would otherwise disrupt the flow, but maybe you have some ideas on how to incorporate some of the info. For example, the first footnote on the name changes of the Ministry of Culture is important to understand the different names that may be mentioned in the sources, but at the same time this information is not important enough to be in the lead itself. Similarly, the regional/local ICH registers are important to mention but, as they are not included in the list, probably don't belong to the main text. And I'm not quite sure how big of a footnote is too big (especially thinking back to theList of Ukrainian placenames affected by derussification).Shwabb1⟨taco⟩10:56, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In case it helps, I agree with leaving the footnotes as they are. They all include important clarifying details and aren't excessively long and have a better than good proportion to the overall size of this list.DantheAnimator17:20, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also I have a general question not directed to anyone in particular about the usage ofTransliteration andLang templates. I know that it's recommended to use them whenever possible, but this list has lots of cases where these templates could be utilized, in fact so many that I'm worried that adding them would make the page significantly larger and possibly cause loading problems. Currently, I'm simply using italics instead of these templates (as mentioned in the footnote for the description columns), but I'm not sure whether that's registered by screen readers. Then should I keep the italics or replace them with the templates?Shwabb1⟨taco⟩08:32, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Shwabb1 I think adding in all the transliteration and lang templates wouldn't bethat much though if it starts to slow down or causes issues, there is a special Wiki markup bypass that helps for cases like this. It is explainedbriefly here. In the case of this list,Module:Lang would probably be the correct invoke. Thevery long articleJapanese conjugation has the same issue and already uses#invoke: in place of a bunch of templates but also keeps a lot of templates as well (a lot more than this list does currently I think).
So, I would consider simply adding in all the translit and lang templates as they normally would but if there is a strong concern with the byte size, just add in only the regular translit templates and make all the lang templates use the markup{{#invoke:lang|lang|uk|2=Традиція Косівської мальованої кераміки|italics=yes}} (the Cyrillic text is a placeholder example). Also, perMOS:LANG and as you mentioned, the italics don't get picked up by screen readers so the templates or invoke markup would be better. This is my first experience with this class of markup so hopefully it works (the sample markup above worked fine for me in a test) but feel free to let me know if there's any issues with it or for invoke markup for other templates.DantheAnimator04:39, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I just added the Translit/Lang templates, and you're right, they didn't add as much size to the page as I expected. Thanks for clarifying when to use them and the alternative way of invoking them as well.Shwabb1⟨taco⟩08:01, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Small update - two elements were added yesterday, so I updated the list today. I followed the same format, though unfortunately couldn't find any images. The Ministry of Culture will probably post an article about these in the coming days and I may upload images from there if the license checks out.Shwabb1⟨taco⟩10:39, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
MPGuy2824
4 images are missing alt-text (104 images, 100 alt-texts).
Change "Revived due to the Disappearance of Tradition" to "Revived after the disappearance of the tradition".
First and seconddone, but don't the names of the lists count as proper nouns, thus meaning that title case applies? UNESCO uses title case for its lists, and similarly the style is kept in all the lists of World Heritage Sites, many of which are FLs.Shwabb1⟨taco⟩08:17, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You've used the "caption" param for various tables. I don't think that is considered by the wiki engine. At least I couldn't find anything about it inHelp:Tables. Please remove them.
Done
A lead image would be nice. Either a locator map of Ukraine within Europe or one of the images from the first few tables.
I don't want the images to repeat, so added a locator map. Let me know if one showing disputed or occupied territories would fit better.
Great seeing this nominated and congrats Shwabb on your first FLN! :) Adding in a few small things I noticed but will try to do a fuller review when I have time and maybe help with the source review too
"Three items – Embroidery technique 'white-in-white' of the town Reshetylivka in Poltava region, Rivne region tradition of the Polissia Dudka-Vykrutka, and Safeguarding practice of the "Tradition of the Generous Evening in Ukraine" through formal and non-formal education – were nominated for inclusion on the UNESCO lists in 2026."--> "Three items were nominated for inclusion on the UNESCO Lists in 2026: the 'white-on-white' embroidery technique from Reshetylivka in the Poltava region; the Dudka-Vykrutka tradition of Polissia in the Rivne region; and the safeguarding practice of the 'Tradition of the Generous Evening in Ukraine' through formal and non-formal education." (recommendation from ChatGPT, which I also think flows better)
Done (though I did not re-word the names of the nominated items since they're on the UNESCO website and will probably stay the same if these items go through to the UNESCO Lists next year)
Looks good to me
"In addition, one hundred fifteen items are inscribed on the National Register of Elements of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Ukraine." --> Maybe this can be simplified to "In addition, one hundred fifteen items are inscribed on Ukraine's National Register."
Done
"Although all regions of Ukraine are represented in the Register through" --> Does this Register refer to the National Register of UNESCO's register (assuming it's the national one but might be good to add National/UNESCO for clarity)
UNESCO manages three Lists, while the state controls the Register that consists of five Inventories. I can see how this can be confusing since all these terms are similar, so this is fixed.
Makes sense and looks good now
Maybe retitle the "Media" columns to "Photo" for consistency with other lists? (all the rows looked like they had either Photos or were empty so it would also be more precise)
There isone video (Cossack's songs on the UNESCO list), and I initially expected to find more videos (especially for other song and dance-related items) so I titled the columns "Media". I did finda video of the singing tradition of Luka but the YouTube video uploading tool did not let me upload it to Wikimedia Commons (perhaps because of thisscreenshot from the video that is already linked to it, which is what I used in the end). If you believe that the Cossack's songs video is out of place, I can replace it with an image and retitle the columns to "Photo" for consistency.
Ah sorry missed that one though I think it's a great inclusion and definitely should be kept. Considering your explanation, I think the "Media" titling is fine so no worries with that. Also about the uploading issue, I haven't had much Commons experience yet butthis page lists some alternative ways to upload videos/media to Commons that could be helpful? Not sure if this is the same as the issue you described but in my experience, sometimes not having a separate wikidata item can cause issues since only one file can be connected to one wikidata entry, and it might be necessary to create a separate wikidata entry. Also maybe would double check the copyright of the video just in case before retrying an upload to make sure it has a CC/open domain license. Hopefully this helps a bit with it.
Yes, I used the video2commons tool listed to upload directly from YouTube, which did not work. I'll try to download the video through some other website and upload it from my computer instead, maybe that will work. Upd.: it worked this time and I replaced the screenshot with the video itself. Now there should be two videos in total.
"These three groups are specifically recognized as the indigenous peoples of Crimea, a disputed region as the result of its internationally unrecognized annexation by Russia in 2014. Most countries recognize the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol as parts of Ukraine despite the de facto Russian control over the area." --> "These three groups are recognized by the Ukrainian Government as the indigenous peoples of Crimea. SinceRussia's occupation andinternationally unrecognized annexation of the peninsula in 2014, the territory ofCrimea has been disputed, withmost countries recognizing it asde jure part of Ukraine whilede facto it remains under Russian control." Other rewordings also work but I thought this flowed best and was the most informative, accurate, and direct.
Mostly done, though I changed the wording a bit as it's imporant to mention that, administratively, the Crimean peninsula consists of two entities (ARC and Sevastopol). Let me know if you think of a better way to incorporate this information into the text.
The wording looks perfect, nice work! :)
The UNESCO tables have a column for No./Nomination Number but I couldn't find anywhere where the numbering system is explained (i.e. why does the first item start with the number 00893? what do the numbers exactly mean (when the nomination was submitted/accepted/etc.)? maybe how are the numbers read/constructed (does each digit/group of digits represent something or are the numbers randomly generated)? who/what created/formalized the number standards and who manages them now/UNESCO)? Maybe adding in a efn note could help for this? For the National Register numbering, it likely doesn't need any explanation though would be curious if it has always been three digits or adds a digit when it reaches that amount.
I don't know either how the UNESCO's numbering system works, but I do know that the numbers are assigned to specific nominations when they are submitted to UNESCO before they are reviewed. For example, in thislist of nominations that will be evaluated this December, every nomination gets its own number. Regardless, I think this information isn't very important (the system used for World Heritage Sites isn't explained in the respective lists, and that one is even more complicated as it sometimes involves letters). As for the National Register - a digit is added once a new element is inscribed (e.g., currently there are 115 elements, so the newest one is numbered 115).
I see. Considering past WHS FLs don't explain it, I think it should be fine without it. Also for the National Register, makes sense and thanks for telling me
For refs with "National Historical Library of Ukraine" (#33, 56, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 139), can it be linked toVernadsky National Library of Ukraine?
As far as I know, these are different entities
Should be fine as-is than
For all the same refs, "|journal=Нематеріальна культурна спадщина в документних джерелах" should become "|script-journal=Нематеріальна культурна спадщина в документних джерелах |trans-journal=[insert trans name here]"
Done
For ref #40 (Geographical indications of Ukraine), maybe add in "|publisher=" since based on the current info in it, it's unclear if this an official source or third-party (also when I try to access it, I get a warning message about an unsafe connection)
The website is run by an NGO focusing on the development of GIs in Ukraine. I'm not sure what to add for the publisher in this case.
The English-translation of the NGO name should be put in for publisher than since it's the publisher/manager of the website
For ref #72, 105, is "|website=Ukrainer" the same asUkraїner?
Indeed it is (I could have sworn I checked whether there's a page on English Wikipedia on it when making those references)
For ref #76, I'm not too sure about this suggestion but would it be more accurate to have "|website=Helmiaziv hromada" typed out as/linked to Helmiaziv rural hromada?
Yes, that would technically be more correct, but the website is simply named "Helmiaziv hromada"
Completely optional, you could add in as a piped red link to Helmiaziv rural hromada (i.e. "|website=Helmiaziv hromada") that way when the hromada's article is created it'll automatically link to it though also completely fine left without any links too
For ref #96, 150, "|website=Rayon.in.ua" probably could be decapped to "|website=rayon.in.ua" (this is how I've seen it usually though not sure which way would be more correct)
Done
For ref #107, "|website=Hadiach.City" maybe could be linked to Hadiach? (technically not the most accurate link but it sounds like a local media website just for the city)
For ref #133, "|website=Kitsman.City" same question as above
For ref #149, "|website=SarnyNews.City" same question as above
All the "City" newspapers belong to the same platform of independent media created with the help ofthis company. Yes, they are intended to publish local news, but they aren't owned by the local governments, so I think it makes more sense not to link the city names.
Interesting. Better kept without any links than.
For "which was drafted in 2003 and took effect in 2006." in the lead, I think it would look slightly better having ref #2 together with ref #3 at the end of the sentence since there's only a few words that separate the two and the sentence only has two refs but this is optional (WP:CITEFOOT allows for it but up to you and both are fine with me)
Done
"Inscription of new heritage elements on the UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage Lists for their protection and safeguarding is determined by the Intergovernmental Committee for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage, an organization established by the Convention." --> "The inscription of new heritage elements onUNESCO's Intangible Cultural Heritage Lists for protection and safeguarding is determined by the Intergovernmental Committee for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage, an organization established by the Convention."
Done
"The Ministry of Culture of Ukraine has also formed the National Register of Elements of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Ukraine to safeguard the country's cultural elements since 2012, which is required by the Convention for the further nomination of these elements to the UNESCO lists." --> "Since 2012, the Ministry of Culture of Ukraine has also maintained the National Register of Elements of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Ukraine to safeguard the country's cultural elements, which is required by the Convention for the further nomination of elements to the UNESCO lists." (flows a bit better with the preceding paragraph)
Done
"must play a significant role in the social life of the community" --> "must play a significant role in the social life of a community" (refers to many different communities, not just one)
Done
"The submissions are reviewed by the Expert Council on Intangible Cultural Heritage that controls the inscription of elements on the Register." --> "Submissions of elements are reviewed by the Expert Council on Intangible Cultural Heritage, anadvisory body that controls the inscription of elements on the Register." (used thisRada ref for getting its definition as an advisory board, though not sure if the additional ref is needed since the original ref/wording already implies that it is an advisory body; also added in the link since based on the Rada law, it seems to be statutory body as defined by that article though this might be a bit tooWP:EASTEREGG)
Done
"The first Ukrainian element listed – Petrykivka decorative painting – was inscribed in 2013." --> "The first Ukrainian element listed—Petrykivka decorative painting—was inscribed in 2013."
I think em dashes can sometimes look awkward (especially if there's a reference inside), and while this is not the case here, I'd rather use a unified style.WP:DASHVAR allows the use of spaced en dashes in these cases.
Sure, that works well too
"Pysanka is a transnational element shared with Estonia." --> maybe expand slightly to describe what Pysanka is, e.g. "Theegg painting tradition Pysanka is a transnational element shared with Estonia."
Done
"In addition, one hundred fifteen items are inscribed on Ukraine's National Register." --> "In addition, 115 items are inscribed on Ukraine's National Register." (WP guidelines are somewhat vague to any standards but it seems that typing it out numerically as 115, rather than three words, is preferable.
Done
"The inventory includes elements of intangible cultural heritage that are under threat of disappearing due to hostilities, consequences of temporary occupation, natural impacts, or temporary displacement of population." --> "The inventory includes elements of intangible cultural heritage that are under threat of disappearing due to hostilities, consequences of Russian occupation, natural impacts, or temporary displacement of population." (more accurate and less redundant)
Done
I also noticed that all the inventory subsections under the National Register have a brief sentence explaining their scope/purpose except for the first, Inventory of Intangible Cultural Heritage. Maybe might be good to add in a brief sentence there too? Probably also fine as-is
The source actually does not provide an explanation of this inventory, even though it's the largest. It's not exactly the same as UNESCO's Representative List as it doesn't aim to represent the culture globally. Rather, it seems to be the "main" part of the National Register, covering ICH elements that otherwise don't fit the criteria for the other inventories. Now that I look at it, the Ministry's article that I've been using doesn't explain the inventory of revived elements either, so I replaced that with a better source.
I see and good work with the improved ref for the revived elements sentence. If there's no source to describe that list, probably best to leave as-is then
Thank you for the review. I replied to all the comments above, have a look whenever you have time and feel free to leave any comments on the list itself.Shwabb1⟨taco⟩08:49, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Shwabb1 thanks for the quick work and replies :) I added in some ref suggestions/edits I found from looking over all of them and after you reply for those I think I'll give another look to see if there's anything else that should be fixed during the review.DantheAnimator21:47, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Easternsahara sorry for the ping but it's been over a week since you started the check, please consider continuing if possible. I understand that you have other things to work on but I don't want the nomination to be closed for inactivity. Thanks.Shwabb1⟨taco⟩11:23, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
File:Europe-Ukraine.svg - CC BY 3.0
PerMOS:ALTMAP You should describe the information being shown, which is Ukraine is located in Eastern Europe or smth similar
File:Blue flowers box.jpg - multiple licenses, all good
File:Kraina Mriy DSCN2171.jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
File:Adaviye Efendiyeva 01.JPG - pd
File:Ukrainian folk pysanky.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
File:Ukrainian borshch 04.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
File:Кобзарі Кость Черемський та Назар Божинський.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
File:0513 Die Sammlung pokutischer Keramik-Geschirr aus dem 19. Jahrhundert im Stadtmuseum in Sanok.JPG - CC BY-SA 3.0
File:Ткацький верстат Музей ткацтва.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
File:Опішня. Продавчиня кераміки.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
File:Таріль дерев'яна "Серпень".jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
File:ОЙ, НА ГОРІ ТА Й ЖЕНЦІ ЖНУТЬ.jpg - pd
File:Reshetylivka.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
File:2022-01-13 Artem Galkin Malanka Ukrainer 03.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
File:Авторський гобелен Ольги Пілюгіної "Квітуча родина".jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
File:Bubnivka Ceramics 2 Ukraine.JPG - cc0
File:Бортництво - стародавній промисел Полісся.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
File:A basket full of Hutsul pysanky.JPG - CC BY-SA 4.0
File:Folk ritual Vodinnia Kusta in Ukraine 2022.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
File:Самчиківський розпис.jpg - CC BY 4.0
File:2025-06-29 113455 karpenkakaroho11.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
File:Верховинські колядники.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
File:Аркан.jpeg - CC BY-SA 4.0
File:Музична фолькльорна іграшка.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
File:Воскові вінки на Вінничині.jpg - CC BY 4.0
File:Borsch 05.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
File:Carpathian Lizhnyks.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
File:Emroidered shirts from Borshchiv museum Ukraine.jpg - CC BY 3.0
File:Клембівська сорочка з квіткою.jpg - CC BY 4.0
File:Гуляння "Водити Володара".jpg - CC BY 4.0
File:Yavorivsky-pyrig.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
File:Сферична різдвяна звізда Мацьковичі.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
File:Сахновщинський коровай.jpg - CC BY 4.0
File:Malanca din Crasna - Красноїльська Маланка 11.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
File:Did, or Moshul,archaich personage on Christmas festival in Orlovka Kartal village waiting for the competiotion (Ukraine 2019).jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
File:Вкусна домашна баница.JPG - This may be a copyright violation, it says that it got it from another website, please check this out (claims CC BY-SA 3.0)
The website is dead. I checked the archived version and couldn't find any information about the file being released under a CC license, so I replaced it with another image.
File:Adamivka 07.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
File:Бузинник.jpg - CC BY 4.0
File:Автентичну страву «крупки» презентували у Житомирі 1.png - CC BY 4.0
File:Yavoriv toy.jpg - CC BY 4.0
File:Лозоплетіння в с. Іза.jpg - CC BY 4.0
File:Sheep cheese production ukraine 02.png - CC BY 3.0
File:Плацинда з лаваша.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
File:Pysanky2011.JPG - CC BY-SA 3.0
File:Борть на дубі.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
File:Соломоплетіння у Турійській громаді.jpg - CC BY 4.0
File:Botar lekvar museum.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
File:Обряд засівання з конем у селі Вістря.jpg - CC BY 4.0
Most Ukrainian government websites usually do (though not all). This one in particular notes at the bottom of the page that All content is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, unless otherwise noted.
File:Гузь П.І. Кобзар.jpg - pd
File:Map of Ukrainian dialects en.png - CC BY 3.0
File:Buk008.jpg - PD
File:Рогозоплетіння сіл Щітки та Писарівка.jpg - CC BY 4.0
Source 1 pass,will continue review later.
I will not be doing a source review as there are too many sources which are not in English. I think you should elaborate on the connection between the National Register of Ukraine and the UNSECO ICH because it seems like the national register could be placed on a separate list right now. Talk about how the national register helps get items promoted, what its goals are, etc. You should try to find a Ukranian speaking Wikipedian or do reviews for people and ask them for source reviews or something. You could also try the english wikipedia discord
@Easternsahara: As noted in the lead, the main connection between the National Register and UNESCO lists is that the existence of the former is "required by the Convention for the further nomination of elements to the UNESCO lists". It doesn't just help get items promoted, but is a necessary step in the entire process (see Article 12 ofthe Convention). If the UNESCO ICH lists are compared to World Heritage Sites, then the National ICH Register is comparable to a combination of a national register of protected sites and the Tentative List. In addition to the further nomination to UNESCO lists, the National Register's goal is "to safeguard the country's cultural elements". So all of this is already covered in the lead. Is there something else that you were thinking of? And as for why this is one list rather than two - again, the National Register serves as an equivalent to the WHS Tentative List, but also there are very little items from Ukraine on the UNESCO ICH lists (less than eight, so not enough to meetWP:WIAFL if I were to nominate that for FL). The idea of ICH originates from UNESCO and the two lists are inherently connected, so I believe it makes sense to link them together.
File:Традиція вбирання могильних хрестів.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
File:Holubtsi.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
File:Випасаня овець в Тарутінському степу.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
File:Буковинське поминальне деревце з дарами.jpg - CC BY 4.0
Since it looks like no one else will be doing the source review soon, I'll try and at least give a partial spot check, if not a full source review. I'll probably do it over the next few days/this upcoming week given the 191 sources but might be quicker than that. This is my first source review too so any suggestions and help are definitely welcome.DantheAnimator05:53, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Closing note: Thiscandidate has beenpromoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please seeWP:FLC/ar, and leave the{{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until thebot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Palestine has 8 Intangible Cultural Heritage elements. While it does have a national heritage register, this documents things that are tangible (monuments, buildings, etc.) so I have not included it like the Ukraine list does. Otherwise, it is modeled very similarly to the Ukraine list, with its citations and table format.User:Easternsaharaplease reviewthis andthis17:41, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Shwabb1
I'm happy to see another ICH list nomination; I think these are very underrated compared to World Heritage Sites.
Palestine does have a national ICH list, as its existence is necessary for the nomination of these items to the UNESCO lists. For example, this is confirmed in the nomination file for the art of embroidery in Palestine (docx, scroll down to section 5.Inclusion of the element in an inventory). While you don't have to list out all the elements on the national list, I think its existence is worth mentioning. There should be some external sources about it, but if you really can't find any, maybe you can cite a few of the nomination files as all of them have to mention the national list.
UseTemplate:Langx for the Arabic-language text in the lead
I've edited the "Background" section to improve flow and reduce repetition (as well as a few other smaller changes), see if you agree with everything.
Consider changing "Due to the sustenance thatDate palm has provided toArab world, many associated, historically significant, cultural practices have been fostered" to "Many historically significant cultural practices associated with theDate palm have been fostered in theArab world due to its sustenance" or something similar. It's better if "cultural practices" are the subject of the sentence as they are the focus of the description.
I think the "Other intangible cultural heritage" section can be removed as it's too short. The content can be integrated into the lead and the "Background" section instead. The on-going nominations can be moved to the lead for sure, as I did in the Ukrainian list.
I may go through the text in more detail later but that's it for now.
I've looked through the list one more time and applied a few more fixes. Last problem I noticed is that some sources need to be archived. Ping when you're done with everything. Thanks.Shwabb1⟨taco⟩09:15, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I see. If there really aren't any sources for the full, up-to-date list, then you don't have to expand the list itself, but you should still mention its existence in the lead (something like the first sentence of the second paragraph in the Ukrainian list). It's important to mention that the creation of the national register is required by the Convention before the elements can be nominated further to the UNESCO lists, and theWafa source + text of the Convention (currently ref 2) should be sufficient for this purpose.Shwabb1⟨taco⟩07:22, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Fantastic to see this list nominated - I started the article way back and I've really enjoyed seeing it expand. For review:
question - the article states Arabic kohl is due to be inscribed in 2025 - but we are almost at the end of the year, so I wondered whether this reuires an update?
Not yet,this doesn't show Arabic kohl on the list, and it shows it as an ongoing nomination. I'll update it when it is inscribed
To clear this up a bit: "The twentieth session of the Intergovernmental Committee for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage will take place from Monday 8 to Saturday 13 December 2025."Shwabb1⟨taco⟩09:16, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
comment I think some references are duplicated at the bottom - this might be worth checking:
"Its subsequent inscription to the UNESCO lists". I think the "its" is referring to cultural heritage elements (mentioned in prev sentence), in which case it should be replaced by "Their".
Palestinian cultural heritage would be singular because it is heritage and not heritages. It seems grammatically correct
"lifeway" -> "way of life"
Done
Since "Arabic Kohl" was added to the list, that part of the sentence in the Background section can be removed and a mention can be added in the lead.
done
"The use of expressive language, emphasis, speech rhythms, vocal inflections, use of the Palestinian dialect, and other good story-telling techniques are defining features of the Palestinian hikaye" -> "The use of the Palestinian dialect, and good story-telling techniques including expressive language, emphasis, speech rhythms and vocal inflections are defining features of the Palestinian hikaye"
changed
"numerousdifferent motifs". I think that is already implied.
deleted
"became an art form present in marble and wood carving, embroidery, and metal etching, among other art forms." -> "came to be included in marble and wood carving, embroidery, and metal etching, among other art forms." Avoiding repeated use of "art form"
"Traditionally, the Qalam, writing instrument," -> "Traditionally the writing instrument, known as the Qalam,"
"performed by eleven dancers," - the picture shows 12 people (maybe the leader isn't counted as part of the eleven). Either skip the word eleven, or use a different picture, like sayFile:Palestinian girls dancing Dabke.jpg.
replaced
"It is harvested twice a year" You can be more specific and say that the leaves are harvested.
done
wikilink "eyeliner"
done
expand (at least a sentence more) the description of kohl: maybe something about their storage containers.
Closing note: Thiscandidate has beenpromoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please seeWP:FLC/ar, and leave the{{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until thebot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Central America this time. I’ve removed some fluff, consolidated a few data sections into the main table, consolidated all prose into the lead and history section, and improved sourcing. If this gets promoted it would be the first FL under the ambit ofWikiProject Belize. Recent similar FLs:Nepal,Bahamas. -MPGuy2824 (talk)07:57, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Olliefant
Explain how electors are designated
The country doesn't have anElectoral college. The representatives aredirectly elected by all eligible voters. I've changed the cell header to "Electorate" like in the FLs mentioned above and added a line about minimum age for voters to the lead. -MPGuy2824 (talk)
Explain why and when there is redistricting
There should be a dedicated notes section for the two EFNs
Also both EFNs are unsourced
Could use some analysis about partisan compesistion
I'm not entirely convinced that adding something about Belize'stwo party system is appropriate for this list.Elections in Belize seems like a more apt target, but I could be persuaded with a good argument for including it here too. -MPGuy2824 (talk)
I think a comparable article which is currently up for FLC isUnited States congressional delegations from Arkansas, this list briefly discusses partisan compesition, I don't think anything too long is needed just maybe a sentence or two briefly explaining who the major parties are for those unfamilire with Belize's politics.Olliefant (she/her)
I think the infobox text "[National Assembly Building], Independence Hill, [Belmopan], Belize" is technically aWP:GEOLINK violation. I dont think "National Assembly Building" should be included in the place name. It should say "[National Assembly Building] at Independence Hill, [Belmopan], Belize" or something like that
I feel the two see also links should be included in prose
The dash at the end of the table should say the first overall election
I've added the earliest year in that column to the last cell, but this could get confusing: the cell could mean "first election since all these constituencies existed together" or "first election in which at least one these constituencies existed". What do you think? -MPGuy2824 (talk)
"This was reinstated in 1935, but it was made up of only nominated members" => "This was reinstated in 1935 but was made up of only nominated members"
"British Honduras gained full self-government and a new constitution was passed, in 1963" - there's no reason for that comma to be there
"to ensure that their voting population be as equal as possible to each other, as required by the constitution" => "to ensure that their voting populations are as equal as possible, as required by the constitution"
"but voting isn't compulsory" => "but voting is not compulsory"
"Dangriga was known as Stann Creek Town till the 1980s" => "Dangriga was known as Stann Creek Town until the 1980s"
File:Belize constituencies, blank.svg - CC BY-SA 4.0 This would need sourcing to make sure it shows the actual constituencies, please add a source for the borders or names in the description on wikimedia.
Notic3ed that the Bahamas page also doesn't cite anything of the sort. i'llpass image review but it is up to the coordinators whether this is valid or not.
@Easternsahara: See Olliefant's section above where she suggested this. It means "first election in which at least one these constituencies existed". Would it help a reader to quickly understand this if "Total" was replaced by "Overall"? -MPGuy2824 (talk)09:53, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'll add here, my thought process was at a glance its not immediately obvious when the first election was held without looking at all entries and finding the oldest dateOlliefant (she/her)20:57, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I could also change the column header to "Constituency start" or something along those lines. Then the last cell wouldn't need to be filled. Additionally, the table is sortable using that column. -MPGuy2824 (talk)07:25, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I still think it's useless and can the information you talk you want it to display can just be found by looking at the table. However, the total for population requires calculations so it serves a purpose unlike the total for constituency first election.
I think I've solved this by changing the row header to "Overall" and adding a footnote to the last cell. -MPGuy2824 (talk)
Closing note: Thiscandidate has beenpromoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please seeWP:FLC/ar, and leave the{{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until thebot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
With the recent promotion of both the 1999 and 2000 lists, here's the next in the sequence. This year, a couple of songs which came to be associated in the public's minds with the 9/11 attacks got to number one and it's weird to think that was now nearly 25 years ago. Feedback as ever will be most gratefully received and acted upon as fast as humanly possible. I haven't archived the references as the IABot is playing up again - last time I checked the estimated run time was FIVE DAYS! --ChrisTheDude (talk)08:28, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Bgsu98 (11/21/25)
Note: This was originally posted as a quick comment: Just one suggestion, but I'll come back to this later. I would mention that "There You'll Be" is from the Pearl Harbor soundtrack. Similarly to how you noted that "My Heart Will Go On" was from Titanic a few lists back.Bgsu98(Talk)16:15, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In the lead, I would uniform the numbers to be all written out ("four weeks" vis a vis "10 weeks") since they are being used to make comparisons. I also added a missing comma for you. Everything else, including the table, looks good!Bgsu98(Talk)13:09, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"After being displaced from the top spot for a week, it returned to number one for one more week, giving it a final total of 13 weeks in the top spot (12 weeks in 2001)." Comparable values near one another should be all spelled out or all in figures, even if one of the numbers would normally be written differently perMOS:NUMNOTES.
"12 weeks at number one split across four spells atop the chart.": "at number one" and "atop the chart" mean the same thing.
"two songs which came to be associated" / "video paying tribute to the victims of the attacks which went viral on the internet" / "another song which came to be associated" - I think "which" should be "that" here
I suggest linkingThe Boot toThe Boot (website) and removing the publisher parameter (Townsquare Media), since an article for the website could be created later and the wikilink would be beneficial. I also suggest linkingBillboard toBillboard (magazine) for consistency
Closing note: Thiscandidate has beenpromoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please seeWP:FLC/ar, and leave the{{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until thebot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Due to the length and scope of both this list andList of songs in Victorious, I'm not sure criteria 3c is met. It's a very similar list of songs and the two could probably somehow be refined and merged together.StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me21:14, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
TheVictorious cast, an American group formed for the Nickelodeon television seriesVictorious (2010–2013), included --- I'm wondering if there's a better way to reword this to avoid having Victorious twice so close together in the first sentence of the lead? Perhaps something likeThe cast ofVictorious, an American group formed for theNickelodeon television series running from 2010 until 2013, recorded songs for use in the program. These were primarily formed by the [...]
Despite what the table caption says, it does appear the table lists the featured artists?
Is the table initially organized by any method. Oftentimes these appear to be in alphabetical order by default, but if so "Cheer Me Up" should be located before "Countdown". (I haven't checked to see if there's other instances of this in the list.)
I don't disagree that the TOC could be removed, but if it's kept, I suggest using the instructions at{{Compact TOC}} to remove the letters for which there are no songs (E, J, K, N-R, U-Z, and Z).
This should probably link in with{{Victorious}} somehow
Closing note: Thiscandidate has beenpromoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please seeWP:FLC/ar, and leave the{{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until thebot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
"This could be a disaster". Well, I mean... let's hope not, this isn't my situationship.Conan Gray is an American singer-songwriter; quite literally the best musical artist to ever exist. You might not know this, but he even once opened for the Jonas Brothers... he just doesn't always remember. This is someone who's music I relate to on a deeply personal level, like I've never been able to before.
He has grown significantly in popularity this year alone, with his fourth albumWishbone, a supposed 2026 Grammy front-runner. The lead singles from the album, "This Song", "Vodka Cranberry", and "Caramel", all hit mainstream radio and the second was even performed at this year's MTV VMA's despite being too late for the awards cycle. Outside of that you may recognize his other work such as "Maniac", "People Watching", or "Heather", the latter of which was a sleeper hit that took over TikTok during the height of COVID lockdowns.
Over the last few days I put together acomplete list of his songs, and am eager to bring it through the FLC process. I'll try to keep this brief, and say that if you haven't ever listed to any of Gray's music I strongly recommend it. Thanks in advance for any reviews, and in the meantime I'll part with more of my favorite lyrics: "I wanna feel all that love and emotion; be that attached to the person I'm holding; someday I'll be falling, without caution; but for now, I'm only people-watching" <3TheDoctorWho(talk)07:06, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
File:Cavetown Boys Will Be Bugs Acoustic (3) (cropped).png - CC BY 3.0
File:Lauv-41984.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
File:Dan Nigro @ Theatre at Ace Hotel 2023.jpg - CC BY 2.0, alt-text is improper
File:Max Martin (cropped 2).jpg - CC BY 2.0, archive link needs to be put as the link has expired
File:Oscar Holter in the studio 2014 with Tiësto.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
File:Julia Michaels 11 02 2017 -16 (39242690791).jpg - CC BY 2.0
File:Halsey @ Amazon Music Live 10 31 2024 (54229284381).jpg - CC BY 2.0
File:Lana Del Rey @ Grammy Museum 10 13 2019 (49311023203).jpg - CC BY 2.0
File:Boardmasters2023 (59 of 171) (53120362419) (cropped).jpg - CC BY 2.0
File:Ariana Grande (33269922295) (cropped).jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
File:OlivaRO2150524 (38) (53727178601) (cropped).jpg - CC BY 2.0
All images have proper captions and are relevant, see other comments.
@Arconning: I've added the archive source to Martin's photo. Can I ask how Nigro's alt text in improper or what you would suggest putting there instead? I don't see how a name alone would be helpful, as those with difficulty seeing may not know what Nigro already looks like. In the non-cropped image he's holding a guitar, which I would've added, but that's not what's represented in this specific version.TheDoctorWho(talk)17:13, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"former YouTuber who began his musical career by publishing covers and original songs to the platform in 2013" I think that you should replace 'The platform' with 'YouTube'
"under the title Kid Krow, Decomposed." according to the linked article the title seems to be "Kid Krow, Decomposed (5 Year Anniversary)"
"and in an effort not to ruin friendships with those he does" why?
Also I think ",particularly with artists who he does not have a pre-existing relationship with, and in an effort not to ruin friendships with those he does," could be merged together because currently the sentence seems a bit awkward
Can the "Writer(s)" column be made sortable?
"Ryan McMahon" and "Paul Klein" need to be disambiguated in the table
I find it weird to differentiate between "Non-album single" and "YouTube", I think a better solution would be to list them all as not being from an album with an EFN for the YouTube ones
I found a huge error, a pretty unrepairable that makes me lean oppose the sentence "quite literally the best musical artist to ever exist" is blatant Billy Joel slander and should be removed as NPOV.
@Olliefant: Done on nearly everything. Any misunderstanding on "and in an effort not to ruin friendships with those he does" should hopefully be resolved with the suggestion below?Kid Krow, Decomposed (5 Year Anniversary) was the official release title from the publisher, but the shorter version is sometimes used in its place and is also the title that's physically printed on the release:[11],[12],[13]. I could try and rework it if need be, but given the sentence that precedes it, I was hoping to avoid "fifth/5 [year] anniversary" so close together.
"Universal Music Group signed Gray to Republic Records in 2018, he then released" - comma should be a semi-colon
"Most notably is his producer Dan Nigro, who has made contributions to each of the aforementioned releases" - this doesn't work grammatically. I would suggest "His most frequent collaborator is his producer Dan Nigro, who has made contributions to each of the aforementioned releases"
"While Gray has stated he personally prefers not to participate in musical collaborations, particularly with artists who he does not have a pre-existing relationship with, and in an effort not to ruin friendships with those he does,[8][9] he has sung with Cavetown, Lauv, and Olivia Rodrigo." - I can't parse this sentence at all. Ithink what you are trying to say is "While Gray has stated that he prefers not to participate in musical collaborations with artists with whom he does not have a pre-existing relationship, and is concerned that collaborating may ruin friendships with those with whom he does,[8][9] he has sung with Cavetown, Lauv, and Olivia Rodrigo."
"that weren't released on Found Heaven" - no contractions please
"Gray has written and sang with Olivia Rodrigo (pictured in 2024), his best friend with who he shares a producer." => "Gray has written and sung with Olivia Rodrigo (pictured in 2024), his best friend, with whom he shares a producer."
"In separate interviews, Gray admitted to having written with Rodrigo, but referred to this song as only being a rumor" - this is a complete sentence, so needs a full stop --ChrisTheDude (talk)16:31, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am used to seeing these type of list being named "List of songs recorded by X", like withList of songs recorded by Lady Gaga orList of songs recorded by Billie Eilish. Was there a reason to not include "recorded" in the title of this list? Just so you know, I have brought this up in a later comment in my review.
I wonder if it is necessary to have "formerYouTuber" in the lead's first sentence? It could be simplified somewhat by removing that part and saying "an Americansinger-songwriter who began his musical career by publishingcovers and original songs toYouTube in 2013" instead, as the later half of the sentence already touches on the YouTuber covers. That and it seems that Gray is more known as a singer rather than as YouTuber, but feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
The following sentence could use some additional fine-tuning: While Gray has stated that he prefers not to participate inmusical collaborations with artists with whom he does not have a pre-existing relationship, and is concerned that collaborating may ruin friendships with those with whom he does, he has sung withCavetown,Lauv, andOlivia Rodrigo. It is quite long and could be considered a run-on. I also find the use of negatives at the start to be confusing. I have attempted to put together an idea on how to condense this down while maintaining the content, (Gray has stated that he prefersmusical collaborations with artists with whom he has a pre-existing relationship, and although he worries that collaborating may ruin these connections, he has sung with friendsCavetown,Lauv, andOlivia Rodrigo.), but please let me know if I had misread what you wrote. Just to be clear, the information is solid, but I think that further revisions would be helpful.
I am uncertain about the inclusion of "Jolene", as I would not think that a live performance of a song during an event or a concert would really suit this type of list. I have the same concern for his performance of "The Subway" onLive Lounge and how he performed a portion "Without Me" for aTwitter video. I would think that this list should be restricted to songs that Gray has recorded. I think that theYouTube covers make sense as he recorded and released covers of the full songs, but I am more unsure about some of the other entries, as again, I do not believe that they really fit with this type of list. This goes back to my first point about the title of the list, specifically the absence of "recorded".
Album titles should be in italics in the citation titles perWP:CONFORMTITLE. I first noticed this with Citation 5 forSuperache, but I also see this with Citation 6 forWishbone, so I would recommend looking through all of the citations with this in mind.
This is more of a nitpick, but I would put the title for Citation 7 intitle case to be consistent with the other references. It may also be good to look over the citation titles in general to make sure that this is consistent.
I hope that these comments are helpful. I have looked atthis version of the list for my review. Let me know if you have any questions, and I will look through the list once everything has been completed. Have a great rest of your weekend!Aoba47 (talk)02:16, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Aoba47: I addressed your comments about the lead as well as the album italics and title case.
To answer your question: I left "recorded" out of the title so that the scope could be expanded to include songs written by, but not performed by Gray, or those where he is listed as an artist, but no proof of recording exists yet. While fewer in precedent, a few other [featured] lists follow this model (List of songs by Taylor Swift,List of songs by Coldplay,List of songs by Anne-Marie, andList of songs by Matty Healy, just to name a few). Limiting the scope to recorded songs only would drop "1000 Things", "Dreamlike", and "No Deal", from the unreleased section and possibly "I'll Make Cereal" from the released song section as Gray is only credited as a background vocalist and writer rather than a featured artist.
For the covers you mentioned in the unreleased section, I couldn't find any exact precedence or discussion on including partial releases. I also personally went back and fourth a while deciding whether or not to include them. While this is up for debate, I ultimately decided to include them after feeling that the release on Twitter rather than YouTube was just a change of venue. Had the partial releases been posted on YouTube as a short, or had the YouTube recordings been released in full on Twitter, I would have still included them as they would still meet the restriction of being a recording by Gray. In other words the only reason they're in the unreleased section isn't because of the platform, but because they weren't released in full. With that determination, it felt odd to pick and choose what to include essentially. (A few of these were also mentioned on a "list of covers" by the record label:[14])
For Jolene, the portion that was posted, was posted by Conan's official social media accounts, so I would have included that in the unreleased section regardless of if "recorded" is in the title, as it was still recorded by Conan('s team). The closest precedence I found for "The Subway" (and by association of this criteria, "Save Your Tears") wasList of songs recorded by Demi Lovato, which although not featured, does included Live Lounge and Spotify Single releases. I do eventually plan on revisingList of Conan Gray live performances, which could include "Jolene", "The Subway", and "The One That Got Away". However, I assume that the partial Twitter releases, "Without Me", "Ocean Eyes", and "Slow Burn", would presumably be out of scope for that list as well. If these songs are an absolute deal breakers, I can remove them. I won't hold this back from becoming featured just because of these few. I just wanted to explain my thought process first since you inquired about the scope.TheDoctorWho(talk)19:16, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your response and for addressing everything so far. I agree with your reasoning for not including "recorded" in the title for this. It does make sense to include instances in which Gray participated in a song as a writer and a background vocalist.
In retrospect, I am actually more uncertain about including any of the covers (including the YouTube ones). Here is another example.Ariana Grande has done covers on YouTube (and in live performances), but none of these are included inthe list of her songs. Like with the Dua Lipa and Billie Eilish lists, this one only includes covers that were officially released, such as with "The Wizard and I" forWicked (15th Anniversary Special Edition).
While I understand why you linkedList of songs recorded by Demi Lovato as an example, I think that it would be better to find a featured list as an example to show that this was approved during a FLC process. I think that it would be best to stick with songs that got an official release as part of an album, EP, or a standalone single (whether it is from a label or independently), but it might be best to wait and see what other editors have to say before making any big changes. I could very well just be over-thinking this to the max. You could also trying reaching out to editors who work on music-related lists. I am more than willing to admit when I am wrong.
On a side note,Cowboy Carter should be italicized for Citation 17. Song title should be in single quotation marks for the citation titles, so the double quotation marks should be adjusted for "Make You Feel My Love" in Citation 72 and "Sweater Weather" needs quotation marks for Citation 65 (and "Video Games" in Citation 75 and "Bed Rest" in Citation 80). These are just examples, so I would encourage you to go through all of the citations to make sure that song and album titles are properly formatted. Just to be clear, I am looking atthis version of the list. I hope that this was helpful, and best of luck with the FLC!Aoba47 (talk)21:05, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Aoba47: I still need to take a look at the other citations that you noted, which I intend on doing sometime in the next 48 hours. In the meantime, I did a deeper dive into other similar featured lists and found a stronger precedence for including covers that weren't formally released by a label:
A quick Google search of these songs only appeared to yield unofficial releases on YouTube, and no official releases through albums, EPs, records, streaming services, or online purchases. This is the first music-related list I've brought to FLC, so I may also be misunderstanding the inclusion of the above in their respective lists, and if so ideally someone will chime in, but I'm hoping it makes a stronger case than before.TheDoctorWho(talk)06:20, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the ping and for the response. You have made a stronger case for the inclusion of these songs, but I would also like to wait to get further feedback on this. Again, I could be entirely wrong.
I think that it is important to note that Goulding's cover of "Take Me to Church" was added after the FLC, and I believe there is a distinction for a singer recording a song for a commercial even if it does not get released. For instance, Lady Gaga's song list includes her cover of "Baby It's Cold Outside" withTony Bennett, but omits out her version of that song withJoseph Gordon-Levitt fromLady Gaga and the Muppets Holiday Spectacular.
It is quite common for singers to do covers, so I am just uncertain about what would count for inclusion for this type of list. I could see a stronger argument for the YouTube covers given that Gray was known as a YouTuber so these are a notable part of his career. Apologies as I could very well be making a mountain out of a molehill ><.
Let me know if you have any questions about my other comments about the citations. Just to be clear, I think that you have done a wonderful job with this list, and I very much enjoyed reading through it. Again, this could very well be a case of me just over-thinking things. I just think that it would beneficial to get some additional feedback about this.Aoba47 (talk)14:57, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Aoba47: Pending any other comments on the covers, I believe I've fixed all of the citation italic/quote issues that you mentioned, as well as several others that I found (with the exception of those using{{Cite AV media}}, also pending any additional comments as discussed on my talk page).TheDoctorWho(talk)22:17, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the ping and for the response. Everything looks good to me. Let me know if there are any additional comments about the covers.Aoba47 (talk)02:00, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Inconsistent use of archive links, suggest running IA Bot
Kudos for implementing full title casing :)
Other comments
Hyphens should normalised to dashes perMOS:CONFORM
Ref 17 is missing a publisher
Refs 21, 41, 60, 77: do we need "Apple Music" here? I see it is removed already in ref 55
Ref 46: is the title not just "Amy: Credits"?
I was somewhat worried about the high proportion of ABOUTSELF references; on reflection I think this is fine as they are supported appropriately by secondary sources. Spotchecks turned up no red flags; please ping me when done.UpTheOctave! • 8va?19:40, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@UpTheOctave!: IAB has an extreme backlog at the moment so I'm not able to run it, but will check back and run it as soon as possible. I've addressed everything in your "other comments" section. Candy, Gayety, Neon, Trill, and Affinity are all high-quality publications known in the music industry for publishing reliable, independent, and impartial information. They also each have a strong editorial board and frequently promote transparency by listing their staff qualifications and/or parent companies on their websites, as can be seen here:Candy (owned bySummitMedia),Gayety (owned byRainbow media),Neon Music,Trill (branch ofTrill Voices), andAffinity.TheDoctorWho(talk)18:57, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I like how you useBroadcast Music, Inc. followed by BMI the first time it's used, and then BMI for all other instances.
The formatting of your notes reads fine.
I will go ahead andsupport this since my first and only suggestion is merely a suggestion, but I strongly discourage the use of acronyms that a reader might be unfamiliar with.Bgsu98(Talk)18:45, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Closing note: Thiscandidate has beenpromoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please seeWP:FLC/ar, and leave the{{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until thebot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Another list on the attempt to create a high quality, standardized list of municipalities for jurisdictions around the world. This is the 63rd (!!!!) such list and previous suggestions have been already incorporated by Alavense and myself so this nomination should go rather smoothly. As always, we are always open and responsive to any suggestions we will then apply to future nominations. Thank you!Mattximus (talk)15:26, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Easternsahara
File:Seville in Spain.svg - CC BY-SA 3.0MOS:ALTMAP, change alt to "Seville is a landlocked province in southern Spain"
File:Karte Gemeinden und Gerichtsbezirke Provinz Sevilla 2022.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 alt should be changed to something about the concentration of municipalities. ie. municipalities are most concentrated in the southeast and least concentrated in the north
Consider usingTemplate:Lang for the Spanish-language phrases and words in the lead ("Ley 7/1985, de 2 de abril, Reguladora de las Bases del Régimen Local", "ayuntamiento" x2, "tenientes de alcalde", "concejales", "pleno", "ayuntamientos").
User:Mattximus: I would strongly recommend switching the two census columns on the table. It reads very awkwardly to go from the most recent census, to the previous census, and then a Plus of Minus that is backwards from what the two numbers would imply. For example, in the first row, you go from 2,064 to 2,141, which is an increase, and then show a change of −3.6%. But it's not an increase; it's a decrease, because the columns are backwards.
Thanks for the review, there is logic to the way it's set up. The first column is the important one (the most up to date census), and the second one (the old population from last census) is only there for comparison purposes, it's not as significant since it is out of date. It's included just to show trends in growth. The logic is to put the most important number first, and the referential one after. Does this make sense?Mattximus (talk)22:00, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It can also be argued that a more logical setup would be chronological. As it is, the math looks backward because you're adding or subtracting from the first column instead of the second.Bgsu98(Talk)22:34, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Source review (11/29/25)
I have spot-checked the following sources:
No. 1 – Checks out.
No. 5 – My Spanish was sufficient to verify this source.
Closing note: Thiscandidate has beenpromoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please seeWP:FLC/ar, and leave the{{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until thebot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Image of the party composition in the infobox is missing alt text (not sure how necessary is it considering that the information is presented farther down, butList of members of the Storting, 2005–2009 has one).
There are a bunch of empty parameters in the infobox. They can be removed.
"Assumed office in this list therefore refers to the swearing in" - add a hyphen to "swearing-in".
Table looks properly formatted.
I think none of the footnotes should end with a period as none of them are complete sentences.
All footnotes except h (the first about Pepijn van Houwelingen) are missing references. Is the information for the other footnotes covered in the corresponding cells in the Ref. column?
It would be better if all the web sources were archived.
Thanks for taking the time to review this article! I will process the feedback in the article. I will double check all the footnotes, whether the used reference is sufficient, but it should be. Regarding the alt-text, I considered it purely decorative given that it is further down the infoboxand in the second and third paragraph of the lead. But if it has been done before, I have no objections to add it (which I have done now).Dajasj (talk)10:55, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have added references where I considered the existing source to be insufficient. I am working on the archived pages, but InternetArchiveBot is busyDajasj (talk)15:10, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've looked through everything again and linked some website names in references; check if they are all correct. My last suggestion is to change "corona pandemic" to "COVID-19 pandemic" in footnote k as the former name is informal (and thelinked article uses "COVID-19" as well). That's a quick and easy fix though, so I willsupport. Good job on the list.Shwabb1⟨taco⟩20:37, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
"Between 6 December 2023 and 11 November 2025, 183 individuals have served" => "Between 6 December 2023 and 11 November 2025, 183 individuals served"
"150 members were elected after the general election of 22 November 2023 and were installed at the start of the term" => "After the general election of 22 November 2023, 150 members were elected and installed at the start of the term"
"33 members were (temporary) replacements" => "There have been 33 temporary replacements"
"Left the House so Pepijn van Houwelingen could join the parliamentary inquiry into the approach to the corona pandemic" => "Left the House so Pepijn van Houwelingen could join the parliamentary inquiry into the approach to the COVID-19 pandemic" --ChrisTheDude (talk)08:43, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for taking the time to review the article, I will change it! I have only one question, not all replacements are temporary, that's why I put it in between brackets. Is it perhaps better to leave "(temporary)" out all together. Kind regards,Dajasj (talk)09:50, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Closing note: Thiscandidate has beenpromoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please seeWP:FLC/ar, and leave the{{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until thebot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
SinceCzech Figure Skating Championships was just promoted, this is the next national skating championship article in line. Hungary and the Czech Republic – along with Slovakia and Poland – hold their national championships in thesame competition and then split off the top results from each nation to determine the national medalists. I am particularly proud of this article, because I had to scour a century's worth of newspaper archives for results and I don't speak a word of Hungarian. The results are all sourced and documented, the tables are properly formatted, and the sources are properly formatted. The newspaper archives are behind a paywall, but I saved screenshots of all of them, so anyone willing to do a source review can simply request whichever sources and I can e-mail them to you. Please let me know if you have any feedback or suggestions, and thank you so much!Bgsu98(Talk)03:10, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
My only comment would be that it might be worth re-arranging the second paragraph of the history section, because my first thought upon starting to read it was "huh? why are they taking about Czechoslovakia?" :-) My suggestion would be as follows:
Since the 2013–14 season, the Hungarian championships have been contested as part of the Four Nationals Figure Skating Championships.[7] The Czech Skating Association and the Slovak Figure Skating Association ran independent national championships until the 2006–07 season, when the two associations joined their national championships together as one event.[5] The Czech Republic and Slovakia alternated as hosts for the combined championships until the 2008–09 season, when Poland joined and the Three Nationals Figure Skating Championships were officially formed.[6] Hungary joined the event in 2013. The four nations rotate as hosts, while skaters from the four countries compete together and the results are then split at the end of the competition to form national podiums.[8]"
User:ChrisTheDude: I do get what you are saying – and I see your point – but upending that paragraph would put the events out of chronological order, and I have been advised on previous similar FLCs to order the events chronologically. I remember making all kinds of changes to the Canada and Great Britain articles in order to put the events chronologically. I could see if it took forever to getting back around to talking about Hungary, but at the same time, mentioning the Four Nationals Championships without the relevant background seems insufficient. I did add a sentence to the beginning of that paragraph, but without the date mentioned. What do you think?Bgsu98(Talk)15:14, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Great work, as always. The prose looks good. The research with Hungarian sources are impressive; I'll AGF that they support your claims, since I don't know Hungarian, either, and you're pretty trustworthy about this kind of thing.
I did some spot checks on the refs. The only issue I found was that some of the Skating Scores refs are broken. You followed WP:Figure Skating's policy to archive all refs in figure skating articles, so it looks like you labelled the URL status as "live" when they should be "dead". Please go through them and correct them.
User:Figureskatingfan: The Skating Scores links are all live. The problem was that if the URL was missing the slash at the end, then it wouldn't load properly. This was not always the case. Either way, I've gone through and made sure all of the URLs have the slash at the end so the pages will load. Thank you for letting me know!Bgsu98(Talk)12:06, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Closing note: Thiscandidate has beenpromoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please seeWP:FLC/ar, and leave the{{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until thebot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Hey all, mammal list #64 in our perpetual series and rodent list #9: Echimyidae. This is our next list covering the Caviomorpha parvorder, aka "things shaped kinda like guinea pigs", with the Neotropical spiny rats, which look like various flavors of spiky guinea pig/rat combos. 88 species largely in the Caribbean and Amazon, though thenutria has been introduced the US and Europe. As always, the list reflects the scientific consensus as well as the results of prior FLCs. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN23:28, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Bgsu98 (11/10/25)
I would recommend wikilinkingwetlands in the lead as you did with the previous list.
...while six species of Caribbean cave rat, comprising the three genera of the subfamily Heteropsomyinae,were made extinct since 1500 due to the European colonization of the Americas and introduction of non-native rats, with some species surviving until the 1900s. – The boldfaced section is super awkward; I would recommend rewording as "have been extinct". You could also remove the commas surroundingcomprising the three genera of the subfamily Heteropsomyinae, but that's really a stylistic preference.
@Bgsu98: Thanks for reviewing! Wikilinks added. I purposely don't use "have been extinct" in these lists when it comes up due to the passive voice- the extinction of these species was not a result of natural causes, but the direct result of human causes, so I want to use active voice. I'm open to suggestions for better phrasing than "were made extinct", though. --PresN01:25, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
User:PresN: Perhaps “were driven to extinction” or “were rendered extinct”. Either way, it’s still passive. The active voice would be something along the lines of “Human encroachment drove species X to extinction.”Bgsu98(Talk)08:15, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not an expert, but{{Species table}} pretends to create captions above tables, but it doesn't as far as I can see. We require this perMOS:TABLECAPTION. So shouldn't this be changed first before we accept it? Although I see that others with this template have been accepted in the past. Please let me know if I'm wrong! :)Dajasj (talk)16:01, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You're mistaken in a couple different respects. The first is that it doesn't "pretend" to put a caption above the tables, it does- there is a < caption > element present (and visible), it just has a colored background. The caption of the first table in this list is "Genus Carterodon – Waterhouse, 1848 – one species". TABLECAPTION explicitly calls this out - "A caption can be styled with CSS". It doesn't have to have the exact same styling of a bare wikitable. The second misconception, although TABLECAPTION doesn't discuss it, is that if the table caption would be duplicative of a nearby section header it doesn't need to be visible at all, it just needs to be present. While these animal lists don't do so, the caption text can be made invisible with the{{screen reader-only}} template, which means that sighted readers don't see the duplicate text (but still have the header to identify the table), but screen reader software, which allows users to jump straight to tables without reading out the header first, will still get and read out the caption. This is similar in conception to image alt-text, which is not visible to sighted readers but present as context for screen reader software. --PresN16:23, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm afraid I was mistaken in a totally different way, and just didn't look in the right place in the HTML. Thanks for your reply and patience :)Dajasj (talk)16:28, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@UpTheOctave!: Thanks for reviewing! Agree and fixed the title for ref 3. The access/archive is because it's the only "cite web" source; you don't include those for journal cites even when they can be seen online. (Also paleodb goes down all the time so the archive is pretty mandatory). Ref 42 does not have a doi listed, I don't know why. Chenasky's ISBN is actually formatted the same- ISBNs don't have a pattern like {3}-{1}-{4}-{4}-{1}, but something more complicated around what the numbers are. This format is how it's printed in the book. --PresN16:14, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough on the cite web sources. On ISBNs: I'll be honest, I somehow completely forgot that the registration group would be different for other areas. My bad there :) Happy tosupport on this.UpTheOctave! • 8va?17:44, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comments and image review from Reconrabbit
Hello again. Out of my great respect for thecoypu this list deserves my attention. Image review goes below, followed by my comments. More-indented items on the image review are looking for attention.
Image review:
File:Echimyidae.png : All the constituent images have usable licenses (own work, VRT ticket-verified or flickr imports). It's a little odd to include a species that isn't universally accepted as belonging to the family given the wealth of other images that exist though. Also, File:Trinomys.jpg doesn't indicate which species it is - why pick T. mirapitanga? (If there are very clear demarcations between species in terms of their pelage this makes sense, butAtlantic spiny rat makes it seem like they are a confusing complex since ranges aren't established. This is a beautiful photograph besides all that.)
File:Callystomis pictus 1 - CMARF-UESC 1230.png : Free per VRT ricket, CC BY SA 4.0
File:Dactylomys dactylinus.JPG : Usable with the given CC-BY SA 3.0 and GNU licenses. I was actually trying to make my own drawing of D. boliviensis but don't have the technical skill/patience for life reproductions sadly.
File:White-faced tree rat standing on log - DPLA - 5632760bf1692380e93a645b3e162dd4.jpg : Usable with CC BY SA 4.0 license. Another striking image.
File:Hoplomys gymnurus1.jpg : Several free licenses.
File:Atlantic Bamboo Rat, Porto Belo, SC, 88210-000, Brasil imported from iNaturalist photo 453361837.jpg : iNat import, good find.
File:Makalata didelphoides.jpg : iNat import.
As with the first image, File:Mesomys hispidus female.jpg : OK, confirmed by VRT.
File:Myocastor coypus 02.jpg : CC BY SA 3.0.
File:Curarão.jpeg : Public domain. Even though this is a pretty poor photoI can see the resemblance.
File:Proechimys guyannensis.jpg : PD but I had to fix some of the description.
File:Proechimys longicaudatus.jpg : Own work released as PD, but the uploading user has no other contributions globally. I can't find any other copies of the image online to refute this though so I'll accept it. Reverse image search sites are useless.
File:Proechimys semispinosus 254496464.jpg : iNat import with usable license. The enclosure and positioning makes this rat look like a supermodel. If you want a more naturalistic but somewhat obscured image, there'sFile:Proechimys semispinosus 33533938.jpg.
File:Thrichomys apereoides no Parque Nacional da Serra da Canastra.jpg : Own work, CC-BY SA 4.0. Metadata is a little weird, but consistent across other photos, mostly Canon brands.
File:Rabudo, Sítio Pau Preto, Potengi - CE, Brasil imported from iNaturalist photo 418722425.jpg : iNat import, CC BY.
File:Trinomys dimidiatus consuming jackfruit in Ilha Grande (Brazil).png : I am not seeing wherethe article this image came from or its figures are released under a CC license
File:Boromys.torrei.bmcz.jpg, File:Boromys.offella.bmcz.jpg : Presumably PD based on age, but source website does not work. Needs a direct link on BHL.
Regarding the response to Bgsu98, Heteropsomyinae is described under Classification as being "made extinct since 1500" - maybe appropriate since this was already addressed in the prior sections but is this still true if some species survived to the 1900s?
Thanks. Unfortunate that Trinomys.jpg can't be used but it's better to be specific. I am finished with the image review, it's just the last 3 that need to be looked at. --Reconrabbit21:12, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Reconrabbit: Removed theTrinomys dimidiatus image, replaced theProechimys semispinosus image, and cited/linked the specific page of the journal at BHL for the two drawings. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN21:30, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Source review – Not sure if Octave's review was intended to be a full sourcing review, but reliability and formatting both look fine throughout and Octave has done spot-checks already.Giants2008 (Talk)22:29, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk)14:21, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
TheDoctorWho(talk)07:20, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
