A change was made outside of the height/weight. The edit looks constructive, but was incorrectly tagged as changing the height or weight. Supposedly there is already a check for a reference that happens to be on the same line, but it doesn't seem to be working in this instance.
Obviously, this is a false positive, but is there actually a way to prevent the filter from triggering when the infobox properties are on the same line? I can't say I know of one, but I am frankly still a little rusty. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆(𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥02:25, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not done though a change to the filter may be needed. Your article was also previously deleted in draftspace. That said, draftspace moves shouldn't be blocked by this filter. –HurricaneZetaC14:53, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@HurricaneZeta: I think this is probably one of those that is a true positive. Moving to Draft:Ajsanzacr83 is certainly disruptive and unnecessary, and the page title would most likely be Draft:(whatever their draft is about), rather than their username. No filter change applied.EggRoll97(talk)23:21, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Private – One or more of the filters triggered are private, and the request needs to be evaluated by an edit filter helper or manager. I merged these two reports since they are identical (the user apparently attempted to get around the filter by registering an account). This is clearly a false positive with regard to filter 384, asFighting Cocks GAA is a real club in this league ("cocks" is the triggering word). A hidden filter is also tripped by this edit though, and I do not have access to see whether or not these edits are also a false positive with regard to that, so I have not performed the disallowed edit pending review by a filter helper/manager.jcgoble3 (talk)06:33, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There's two filters being tripped, one public (clearly a false positive that is probably not worth adjusting the filter for) and one private. A helper/manager needs to check the private filter to see if any action with regard to its purpose is needed.jcgoble3 (talk)18:56, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This edit was tagged as "possible vandalism", even though it doesn't look like it is. It just appears to be changing a comma into a <br/> markup. This also happened with theLondon Spirit andManchester Originals pages, with the log IDs being 42980949, and 42980952, albiet with the former having more changes. Nonetheless, all of these edits seem constructive.
I was trying to provide a correction as a question to which your article was responding with false and when I try to submit the correction for review I received a disallowed notice.
The population origin of Morocco are The barbers and later the Jews that escaped from Egypt showed up and assimilated to form one population after which then in 700 AD the Arabs showed up as conquerors, so no the Arabs are not the origin occupants of Morocco~2025-40883-90 (talk)03:33, 16 December 2025 (UTC)Sid Baz[1][reply]
Try formatting your comments in coherent sentences separated by periods and other punctuation. The filter detects excessively long sentences lacking these basic features of English grammar. Also, please be aware that your personal experiences and the mere fact that you have history books cannot be used to support any edit to a Wikipedia article. Please seeReliable sources andCiting sources.GeneralIzationTalk03:49, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
References
^I was born there and the sources from my history books
I was not attempting to make unconstructive edits, I was adding judge votes like I was with every other year and the filter lets me do it for every other year besides 2018 for some reason
Date and time
04:40, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
Comments
~2025-41029-13
Cite error: There are<ref> tags on this page without content in them (see thehelp page).
Edit was not disallowed though a change to the filter may be needed. --pro-anti-air ––>(talk)<––00:55, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Pinned – This thread has been pinned and will not be archived until this template has been removed. – --pro-anti-air ––>(talk)<––00:55, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not done though a change to the filter may be needed. Your article was also previously deleted in draftspace. That said, draftspace moves shouldn't be blocked by this filter. –HurricaneZetaC14:53, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Private – One or more of the filters triggered are private, and the request needs to be evaluated by an edit filter helper or manager. I merged these two reports since they are identical (the user apparently attempted to get around the filter by registering an account). This is clearly a false positive with regard to filter 384, asFighting Cocks GAA is a real club in this league ("cocks" is the triggering word). A hidden filter is also tripped by this edit though, and I do not have access to see whether or not these edits are also a false positive with regard to that, so I have not performed the disallowed edit pending review by a filter helper/manager.jcgoble3 (talk)06:33, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Consider requesting on the article's talk page; please provide thenecessary references.
Done – The edit for this report has been implemented, but no changes to the filter were made. – --pro-anti-air ––>(talk)<––22:50, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – The filter is working properly. –45dogs (they/them)(talk page)(contributions)03:45, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]