The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result wassoft delete. Based onminimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expiredPROD (a.k.a."soft deletion"). Editors canrequest the article's undeletion.✗plicit14:14, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Carpenters Local 2 (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View log |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

Similar case as the other union nom. Bulk of the sources are either from the Treasury Department showing financial records or a niche study from 2008 which union members took part in. Not able to see notability from the sources or from a search onlineaesurias (talk)08:43, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Organizations andUnited States of America.aesurias (talk)08:43, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in thelist of Ohio-related deletion discussions.WCQuidditch☎✎12:03, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete- current citations as well as additional online searches show lack of SIGCOV to suggest notability.Lorraine Crane (talk)11:56, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.