1930s romantic comedy films (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View log |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

Written like a personal essay, and to my knowledge does not meet guidelines for a fork (WP:Content forks#Caution) 🫀Crash // Organhaver (talk to me, maybe?)22:59, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thelist of Film-related deletion discussions.Shellwood (talk)23:21, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -we are not a website for essays.Bearian (talk)01:35, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -WP:NOT, article is not encyclopedicGb321 (talk)04:04, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete perWP:NOTESSAY. May also be worth noting GPTZero thinks this is 100% AI-generated.lp0 on fire ()07:44, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Per comments and policies above.Kvinnen (talk)18:44, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• DeleteAs the article itself might say, from a quick lookwe see that it hasso many issues,not only being an essay but also being potentially AI-generatedand so much more. Jokes aside, this article is from start to finish an essay written in aWP:Persuasive writing style (as I hope my examples of recurring conspicuous turns of phrase makes clear). As such, it violatesWP:NOTESSAY andWP:DELREASON#14 (Any other contentnot suitable for an encyclopedia) applies.TompaDompa (talk)22:01, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per comments and policies cited above.TheJPS^{talk to me}00:32, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above --Lenticel^(talk)12:10, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete perWP:NOTANESSAYAgnieszka653 (talk)04:55, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and TompaDompa. I also find it somewhat unusual that the article's creator has their user page set up as a redirect to the article.Paprikaiser (talk)20:12, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• AfD debates (Media and music)
• AfD debates