Wikipedia Arbitration
Arbitration directory About arbitration Talk Arbitration policy(CU/OS) Guide to arbitration Noticeboard + Talk Search archived proceedings Ban appeals
Open proceedings All open requests Case requests Clarification and Amendment requests Arbitrator motion requests Enforcement requests
Active sanctions Contentious topics (Log) General sanctions Editor sanctions
Arbitration Committee Discuss + Contact Members Procedures Elections Talk History Clerks + Talk Clerk procedures Conflict of interest reports
Audit Talk Statistics Talk Reports(pre-2016)
Track related changes
v t e

This is the central log for all sanctions issued pursuant to anArbitration Committee contentious topics remedy in 2014 as well as any appeals or modifications made to sanctions issued in 2014.

The required information is the user or page the sanction is being applied to, enforcing administrator, date, nature of sanction, including expiry date (if applicable), basis or context (such as link to AE request), and a diff of the user notification (if applicable).

Yearly logs

• 2025 (/P)
• 2024
• 2023
• 2022
• 2021
• 2020
• 2019
• 2018
• 2017
• 2016
• 2015
• 2014
• 2013
• 2012
• 2011
• 2010
• 2009
• 2008
• 2007
• 2006
• 2005

Quick links

• Wikipedia:Contentious topics
• Contentious topics templates
• Scopes of all active contentious topic designations
• List of community-authorised sanctions
• Community-authorised sanctions templates

• BoboMeowCat (talk ·contribs) notifiedhere of the discretionary sanctions after a block for edit warring atBecky Bell, an abortion-related article.EdJohnston (talk)17:29, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Smokeyfire (talk ·contribs)notified.Drmies (talk)23:46, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• BoboMeowCat (talk ·contribs) has agreed to make no article edits atBecky Bell until 1 May, 2015. This agreement is accepted as closure of theAE complaint. Editor may still participate on Talk. Blocks are possible for violations.EdJohnston (talk)02:53, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Dailey78 (talk ·contribs) topic banned from all pages relating toAncient Egyptian race controversy and associated articles, perthis notice.EdJohnston (talk)16:52, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Jaqeli (talk ·contribs) (previouslyGeorgianJorjadze) istopic-banned from everything related to both Armenia and Georgia, perAE request. Sandstein 11:25, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Blocked for a week fornoncompliance. Sandstein 17:45, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Ban lifted on Jaqeli's request. Sandstein 19:31, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Ban reinstated perAE request. Sandstein 16:19, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Granted an exemption to edit five articles (Georgian scripts,Rhadamistus,Pharnavaz I of Iberia, andPharasmanes II of Iberia) and their talk pages which would otherwise be covered by their topic ban for three months, after which the topic ban will be reviewed at AE (perappeal).HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?17:44, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Fully appealed on June 29, 2015.Details. -Penwhale |^{dance in the air andfollow his steps}15:06, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• NovaSkola (talk ·contribs) blocked for 2 months for atopic ban violation. Sandstein 22:12, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• HouseOfArtaxiad (talk ·contribs) is blocked for two weeks for a topic ban violation atList of wars involving Armenia. His ban from all topics related to Armenia or Azerbaijan is extended to indefinite and it covers both articles and talk pages. Seethe ban notice.EdJohnston (talk)04:17, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Interfase (talk ·contribs)indefinitely topic-banned from Armenia/Azerbaijan topics, including related conflicts for gross incivility, edit-warring, and repeatedly referring to good-faith edits as vandalism. SeeAE thread.HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?19:19, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • After further consideration, and in lieu of the above:
    • Interfase (talk ·contribs) is prohibited from describing any edit as "vandalism" (whether in edit summaries, on talk pages, or anywhere else) unless it meets the definition atWP:VAND (that is, it is an edit made with thedeliberate intention of causing damage to Wikipediaand would be recognised as vandalism by somebody not familiar with the topic),and
    • For any reverts he makes in mainspace that are not of clear and obvious vandalism (within the definition above), he must go to the article's talk page and give his reasons for the revertbefore making any further edits anywhere on Wikipedia.
  • Violations will result in blocks and/or a topic ban.HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?16:42, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Kafkasmurat (talk ·contribs) is subject to a standardone revert per twenty four hours rule on all pages related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related ethnic conflicts. Kafkasmurat is also subject to a personal attacks parole, if any uninvolved administrator believes Kafkasmurat makes a personal attacks they may block Kafkasmurat pursuant to thestandardized enforcement provision. Kafkasmurat is warned that they will likely be topic banned for any further violations of Wikipedia's norms. Sanctioned perthis AE request.Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)07:14, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Urartu TH (talk ·contribs) blocked for 48 h for misconduct inan AE thread. Sandstein 10:00, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Maurice07 (talk ·contribs) is indefinitely topic banned from everything related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related ethnic conflicts anywhere on Wikipedia perAE request (user notification).Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)08:09, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Urartu TH (talk ·contribs) is subject to a restriction on reverts in this area: 0RR for a period of 1 month, and 1RR for a period of 3 months after 0RR expires, due to aAE request. User wasnotified here. -Penwhale |^{dance in the air andfollow his steps}03:39, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Aleko rubin (talk ·contribs) blocked for 36 hours for edit warring atArmenia per a report atWP:AN3.--Bbb23 (talk)19:41, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk ·contribs) is restricted toWP:1RR as concerns the history of Armenia or Georgia for three months, perAE request. Sandstein 16:22, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Ithinkicahn (talk ·contribs) is banned from editing any articles related to Armenian Genocide topics, and from adding, removing, or editing any mention of the Armenian Genocide in any other article. (AE thread;notification.)HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?22:07, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Fmelikov (talk ·contribs) has been banned from editingLavash for one year. He may continue to edit the article's talkpage.Bishonen |talk22:24, 19 December 2014 (UTC).[reply]
• Behzat is banned from editing articles on Armenia and the Armenian genocide, broadly speaking; for now, editor is allowed to edit talk pages, as long as they comment civilly and appropriately.Drmies (talk)05:50, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Carolmooredc (talk ·contribs) blocked two weeks for a topic ban violation perAE request. Sandstein 15:58, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Unblocked with awarning that participating in discussions regarding the conduct of others in the topic area is a violation of the topic ban. Sandstein 21:37, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• SPECIFICO (talk ·contribs) blocked for two weeks perAE request. Sandstein 16:14, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• The topic ban of SPECIFICO is expanded to cover everything and everyone related to theAustrian School of economics, in addition to the previous topic ban covering theLudwig von Mises Institute and persons related to it, perAE request. Sandstein 08:10, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• 03:07, 21 January 2014Kuru (talk ·contribs ·blocks ·protections ·deletions ·page moves ·rights ·RfA) blocked68.32.136.75 (talk ·contribs) for 1 month for a violation of 1RR/wk article restriction below atTalk:Ayn Rand (edit |subject |history |links |watch |logs). Note this isPc1985 (talk ·contribs) editing logged out.

• Darkness Shines (talk ·contribs) is prohibited from reverting, without exceptions, any edit to an article if that edit or article is related to the topic of climate change. This sanction is imposed for edit-warring as discussed onthe user's talk page. Sandstein 18:10, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Appeal toWP:AEdeclined. Sandstein 12:55, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Kaj Taj Mahal (talk ·contribs) is banned from the entire topic area of climate change, perWP:TBAN, for six months; perAE request. Sandstein 07:53, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Cwmacdougall (talk ·contribs) is banned from editing the article "Global warming" and its talk page, pertalk page notification. Sandstein 15:02, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• IHaveAMastersDegree (talk ·contribs) is topic-banned (perWP:TBAN) from everything that is both related to climate change and to a living person, for the duration of six months, perAE request. Sandstein 21:31, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Shervinsky (talk ·contribs) blocked for one month for resumption of edit warring atLittle Russian identity.Shervinsky (talk ·contribs) is also indefinitely subject to a 1RR restriction on all pages relating to Eastern Europe, this may be appealed on my talk page after 3 months. Perthis notice on their talk page.Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)12:38, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Matthead (talk ·contribs) blocked for two weeks for violating their Poland topic ban, perAE request. Sandstein 16:10, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Solntsa90 (talk ·contribs) restricted to making one revert in any 48 hour period on the articleArseniy Yatsenyuk (including the talk page and any subpages), this restriction expires at 12:00, 2 May 2014 (UTC). Sanctioned due to edit warring after previous block, please see thenotification for more information.Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)09:18, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• LokiiT (talk ·contribs) blocked for one week perAE request. Sandstein 11:55, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• ArmijaDonetsk (talk ·contribs) topic-banned from all edits relating to Crimea, the Ukrainian conflict and Ukrainian-Russian relations for a period of one year.Fut.Perf.☼21:51, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Lvivske (talk ·contribs) blocked for one week for breachingEastern Europe edit restriction perthis AE request.Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)07:35, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• The editor most recently editing as89.105.158.243(talk ·contribs ·IP contribs ·WHOIS) topic-banned from all edits regarding the Russian-Ukrainian conflict for a period of 3 months.Fut.Perf.☼12:22, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• COD T 3 (talk ·contribs) is topic banned from all articles (including talk pages and subpages) related to Eastern Europe perthis AE request.Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)14:25, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Franek K. (talk ·contribs) topic-banned from everything related to Silesia and Silesians, perAE request. Sandstein 08:11, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Derianus (talk ·contribs) is topic-banned from everything related to Eastern Europe for six months perthis discussion. --Ricky81682 (talk)22:15, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• HCPUNXKID (talk ·contribs) isbanned from the topic of Ukraine and any Russian topics connected to Ukraine, broadly construed, for six months. This applies on all pages of Wikipedia including talk and noticeboards.EdJohnston (talk)16:05, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Eurocentral (talk ·contribs) isbanned from the topic of Hungary or Romania, broadly construed, for six months. This applies on all pages of Wikipedia including talk and noticeboards.EdJohnston (talk)18:47, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Eurocentralappealed on 25 January 2015; the appeal was declined.HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?21:38, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Poeticbent (talk ·contribs) blocked 3 days for edit-warring atCzesław Mączyński‎.Fut.Perf.☼09:33, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Magyarcsaba (talk ·contribs) blocked indefinitely (as an AE block for the first year) for persistent ethnic battleground conduct, including while logged out—resulting multiple blocks of their IP addresses.HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?11:33, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Aaron Schock (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) is fully protected for three months due to a current dispute regarding include gossip and rumours regarding whether Schock is gay, seethis notice.Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)08:58, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Kendrick7 (talk ·contribs) is i) blocked for 1 month and ii) indefinitely banned from making any edit related toJack T. Chick (including editing the article and talk page) anywhere on Wikipedia for any reason except to seek clarification of or to appeal this ban.The user has beenblocked for BLP violations and was explicitlywarned about BLP violations in the unblock statement, the user has also beenblocked for editing warring on this article. User notifiedhere.Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)12:20, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Useitorloseit (talk ·contribs) isindefinitely banned from editingTa-Nehisi Coates, its talk page, and any associated articles, talk pages, and other Wikipedia spaces/discussions.Drmies (talk)22:22, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• All editors ofTony Abbott (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) are subject to an indefinite one revert per twenty-four hours restriction on that article due to continued edit warring by various users.Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)12:01, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Removed on 20 January 2025.Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)02:00, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Johnpacklambert (talk ·contribs) topic-banned indefinitely from all edits and discussions regarding the so-calledDuke lacrosse case, the so-calledGroup of 88, and persons related to these.[1][2].Fut.Perf.?08:52, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Titanium Dragon (talk ·contribs) topic-banned indefinitely from edits and discussion regardingZoe Quinn andGamerGate under BLP discretionary sanctions.Gamaliel(talk)15:00, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban struck as Titanium Dragon was not made "aware" of discretionary sanctions prior to the ban being issued. See discussionhere.Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)07:10, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Oct13 (talk ·contribs) topic-banned indefinitely from edits and discussion regardingZoe Quinn,Anita Sarkeesian andGamerGate under BLP discretionary sanctions.Acroterion(talk)14:33, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Snakebyte42 (talk ·contribs) topic-banned indefinitely from edits and discussion regardingZoe Quinn,Gamergate and related articles, broadly construed, under BLP discretionary sanctions and perthis discussion atWP:ANI. --Euryalus (talk)02:00, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Snakebyte42 (talk ·contribs) topic-banned for six months from editing BLPs, under BLP discretionary sanctions. --Euryalus (talk)02:00, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Titanium Dragon (talk ·contribs) topic-banned from all edits regarding the so-calledGamergate controversy, after complainthere[3].Fut.Perf.☼08:29, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• This ban has been endorsed by the Arbitration Committee in theGamerGate case, and is now considered an ArbCom ban (eg, for appeals, modifications and enforcement).Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)05:50, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• ArmyLine (talk ·contribs) topic-banned for one year from edits and discussion regardingGamerGate under BLP discretionary sanctions.Acroterion(talk)00:39, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • ArmyLine (talk ·contribs) blocked 1 week for breach of topic ban, per[4].Fut.Perf.☼10:46, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Kitsunedawn (talk ·contribs)indefinitely banned from making any edit to the GamerGate controversy article and its talk page and from making any edit or comment connected to GamerGate or any person involved in GamerGate anywhere on Wikipedia for insertion of grossly inappropriate material on a talk page.HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?13:22, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• On foot of the following WP:AE thread[5]Myopia123 (talk ·contribs),Cwobeel (talk ·contribs) &Brianhe (talk ·contribs) are admonished for conduct incompatible withWP:BATTLE on pages covered byWP:BLP and thusWP:NEWBLPBAN. In particular the interaction between them and User:Factchecker_atyourservice is noted as the locus of the issue here. The individual warnings are logged as follows[6][7][8]---13:29, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• On foot of the following WP:AE thread[9]Factchecker_atyourservice (talk ·contribs) is given a final warning re: civility at pages covered byWP:BLP and thusWP:NEWBLPBAN. In particular his conduct towards Users: Brianhe, Cwobeel & Myopia123 is noted as particularly inappropriate. He is formally admonished for conduct incompatible withWP:BATTLE and reminded no to make personalized comments about other editors[10]--13:29, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The following sanctions were inherited from thecommunity general sanctions:

• Agent Chieftain - 90 day topic ban fromGamerGate, broadly construed (on27 October 2014) byAcroterion.
• Fyrius72 hour block foredit warring to remove sources (on28 October 2014) byNandesuka.
• Willhesucceed 24 hour block for violatingexpected standards of conduct (on31 October 2014) byDreadstar.
• Die-yng - indefinite topic ban from all pages and discussion related to GamerGate and Brianna Wu, broadly construed (on06 November 2014) byGamaliel.
• Torga - 90 Day topic ban fromGamerGate broadly construed (on11 November 2014) byDreadstar.
  • Torga - 72 hour block for violation of topic ban (on14 November 2014) byLankiveil.
• Two Tune - 90 Day topic ban fromGamerGate broadly construed (on22 November 2014) byAcroterion.
• DungeonSiegeAddict510 topic-banned from all edits and all discussions related to Gamergate controversy for 90 days, per enforcement request (on22 November 2014) per[11] byFuture Perfect at Sunrise.
• Cobbsaladin topic-banned from all edits and all discussions related to Gamergate controversy, broadly construed, for 30 days (on24 November 2014) byGamaliel.
  • Appealed on 25 November, resulting inan extension to indefinite.MastCell
• ArmyLine blocked 1 week for breach of topic ban, per[12] (on26 November 2014) byFuture Perfect at Sunrise.
• MarkBernstein indefinitely topic-banned from all edits and all discussions related to Gamergate controversy, broadly construed, not including participation in ArbCom cases (on28 November 2014) byGamaliel.

• Sanction lifted7 February 2015 byGamaliel

• Tutelary topic-banned from all edits and all discussions related to Gamergate controversy, broadly construed, not including participation in ArbCom cases (on28 November 2014) byGamaliel.
• Xander756 indefinite topic ban fromGamerGate, broadly construed, due to offsite canvassing and disruptive behavior atTalk:Anita Sarkeesian taken in the context of previous behavior inclduing comments atTalk:Brianna Wu. Simultaneous 2 week block for disruptive behavior intended as an ordinary admin action and not under GS (on30 November 2014) byKevin Gorman.
• DungeonSiegeAddict510 blocked 1 week for breach of topic ban (on05 December 2014) byFuture Perfect at Sunrise.
• Avono topic banned from editing any pages related toGamerGate controversy, broadly construed, or from making any edits in other areas that discuss the same, for a period of 30 days. An exception is made for participating atWP:ARBGG (on 06 December 2014 perenforcement request)The Wordsmith.
• Kitsunedawn banned indefinitely from making any edit to theGamerGate controversy article and its talk page and from making any edit or comment connected to GamerGate or any person invovled in GamerGate anywhere on Wikipedia (on23 December 2014) byHJ Mitchell.
• Cla68 topic banned from making any edit to any article or page connected with the GamerGate controversy article, broadly construed (on23 December 2014) byHJ Mitchell.
• Cla68 blocked for a week for restoring grossly inappropriate material to a talk page (on23 December 2014) byHJ Mitchell.

• Lightbreather (talk ·contribs) topic banned fromgun control for six months perthis AE request.Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)13:46, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Granted an exemption to edit theWP:AE#Sue Rangell section only in order to properly file this enforcement request as well as replies and comments in that section only.Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)13:51, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Scalhotrod (talk ·contribs) topic banned fromgun control for six months perthis AE request.Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)13:46, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• JCAla (talk ·contribs) is topic banned from editing or discussing the articleAhmad Shah Massoud and the contents of other articles that concern the person Ahmad Shah Massoud[13].MBisanz^talk07:46, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Pilot2020mi (talk ·contribs), blocked for a week and banned from making any edits relating to any religion in India across all namespaces for six months for disruptive editing.Salvio^{Let's talk about it!}19:35, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Mrt3366 (talk ·contribs) topic-banned from all edits relating to Indian and Pakistani politics for a period of 6 months, after persistent tendentious editing on2002 Gujarat violence,Minorities in Pakistan and similar articles.[14].Fut.Perf.☼21:05, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Neo. (talk ·contribs) is topic banned from anything about religion or politics inGujarat for three months. The ban covers all pages of Wikipedia including talk. One of the pages included is2002 Gujarat violence. Notified of the banhere.EdJohnston (talk)17:14, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Dhruv2357 (talk ·contribs) has been blocked indefinitely for makingthreats of physical violence.--v/r -TP23:51, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Khabboos (talk ·contribs)topic-banned from the topic of Islam as related to India, Pakistan and Afghanistan perAE thread. Sandstein 05:50, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Blocked for a month and topic ban extended to religion or ethnic conflicts in India, Pakistan or Afghanistan, perAE thread. Sandstein 16:39, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• ZORDANLIGHTER (talk ·contribs) is indefinitely topic banned[15] from topics relating to India, Pakistan and Afghanistan pursuant to this AE thread[16].--19:43, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Now blocked indefinitely for violation of the above sanction.Yunshui ^雲_水14:52, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Rim sim (talk ·contribs) blocked for one week and topic banned from everything related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, broadly construed, anywhere on Wikipedia perthis AE request.Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)10:00, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rim sim (talk ·contribs) blocked for one week for violating topic ban, seeblock message for more information.Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)13:57, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Following asuccessful appeal on AN the TBAN is lifted.Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)08:29, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Darkness Shines (talk ·contribs) blocked for two months perthis AE request.Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)00:18, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Unblocked perunblock discussion andunblock conditions (note: these conditions are not discretionary sanctions and apply on all pages).Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)14:23, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Darkness Shines (talk ·contribs) topic banned from all pages related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, broadly construed, perthis AE request,notification.Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)13:35, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Darkness Shines is granted an exemption to report sockpuppets toWP:SPIper the conditions listedhere.Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)08:14, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Darkness Shines (talk ·contribs) is granted an exemption to bring one article (DS has chosenFemale infanticide in India (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) with my approval) up to GA standard, whereupon lifting or further loosening of the topic ban will be considered. SeeAE thread, where the exemption was approved byCallanecc (the original sanctioning admin).HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?15:32, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk ·contribs ·blocks ·protections ·deletions ·page moves ·rights ·RfA) iswarned for edit warring and reminded of expectations of administrators perthis AE request.Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)13:35, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Visakha veera (talk ·contribs) is blocked indefinitely for making legal threats likethis.De728631 (talk)17:42, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Md iet (talk ·contribs) is banned from the topic of theDawoodi Bohra on all pages of Wikipedia including talk. Seetopic ban notice, with link to a discussion at WP:AN3.EdJohnston (talk)04:43, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Perthis notice the ban has been narrowed. Md iet may now comment on all talk pages concerningDawoodi Bohra, but is still restricted from articles.EdJohnston (talk)21:00, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• User:Md iet's ban from the Dawoodi Bohra wasfull lifted in June 2017 per an AE request.EdJohnston (talk)18:25, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Bhargavaflame (talk ·contribs) is banned from the topic of theBhargava on all pages of Wikipedia including talk. Seetopic ban notice.EdJohnston (talk)18:37, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Blocked for a week for breaching the topic ban with edits atTalk:Bhargava - block messagehere. --Euryalus (talk)18:51, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Qazxcv1234 (talk ·contribs) was banned from the topic of theDawoodi Bohra on all pages of Wikipedia, including talk. Seethis notice.EdJohnston (talk)02:53, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Blocked three days for ban violation by editingMufaddal Saifuddin, perblock message.EdJohnston (talk)02:59, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• TopGun (talk ·contribs) istopic banned from making any edit related to wars between India and Pakistan, expiring 12:00, 20 March 2015 (UTC) in response tothis AE request.Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)00:46, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Scope of ban clarifiedhere.Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)10:56, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Following anappeal on my talk page, Topgun's topic ban above is vacated and replaced with the following: "TopGun (talk ·contribs) istopic banned from making any edit related toBattle of Chawinda, expiring 12:00, 20 March 2015 (UTC)".Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)08:17, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Slovenski Volk (talk ·contribs)indefinitely topic-banned from all articles relating to the Balkans, to be reviewed after six months, provided he is not sanctioned for a violation of the topic ban in the meantime.HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?15:49, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  Topic ban lifted per[17]--Ymblanter (talk)08:07, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Ivan Štambuk (talk ·contribs) blocked for a week perAE request. Sandstein 12:51, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Srbin95 (talk ·contribs) blocked for one week forvandalism of four Kosovo-related articles by blanking the pages and/or replacing the contents withKosovo je Srbija!! (Kosovo is Serbia). I didn't label this as an AE block; anyone doing anything like this to any group of articles would deserve similar treatment. — Richwales(no relation to Jimbo)00:07, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Nado158 (talk ·contribs) blocked for 48 h forpersonal attacks. Sandstein 18:05, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Buttons is banned from undoing, in whole or in part, any revert (as defined inWP:3RR) with respect to content related to Kosovo or Serbia for the duration of a year, perAE request. Sandstein 07:17, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Nado158 is topic-banned, as described inWP:TBAN, from everything related to Serbia, Kosovo, and Albania, perAE request. Sandstein 08:15, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Reaper7 is topic-banned, as described inWP:TBAN, from everything related to anything known asMacedonia, including but not limited to the modern country, the Greek region and the historical region, perAE request. Sandstein 13:33, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• J intela (talk ·contribs) blocked for 36 hours for violatingWP:3RR atIsraeli-occupied territories based on a report atWP:AN3.--Bbb23 (talk)16:57, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Avaya1 (talk ·contribs) now under 0RR with respect to articles related to Arab-Israeli conflicts due to violations reported atWP:AE. See[18]. -Penwhale |^{dance in the air andfollow his steps}04:25, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• GHcool (talk ·contribs) is banned from the topic of the Israeli/Palestinian conflict for one year on all pages of Wikipedia including talk. --Guerillero |My Talk07:35, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Jewish exodus from Arab and Muslim countries (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) full protected for one week due to slow-motion edit war under discretionary sanction, with local consensus on specific subsection edits being allowed to make changes while the protect is on.[19]Georgewilliamherbert (talk)03:52, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Precision123 (talk ·contribs) is banned from the articleIsrael and its talk page for one week.[20]Georgewilliamherbert (talk)04:33, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Bukrafil (talk ·contribs) blocked 24 hours forcasting aspersions against another editor at AE without evidence, contrary to a warning to all participants in the thread.HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?15:41, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note thatBukrafil (talk ·contribs) has been indefinitely blocked as a result ofWP:Sockpuppet investigations/Gilabrand.HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?17:04, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Tritomex (talk ·contribs) blocked 24 hours forcasting aspersions against other editors at AE without evidence, contrary to a warning to all participants in the thread.HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?11:13, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Gilabrand (talk ·contribs) blocked one year for (CheckUser-confirmed) sock-puppetry (seeWP:Sockpuppet investigations/Gilabrand) and long-term POV-pushing and tendentious editing. This block to run concurrently with an indefinite SPI block (see also:AE thread).HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?17:01, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Gilabrand (talk ·contribs) is further banned from making any edit related to Palestine or the Arab-Israeli conflict anywhere on Wikipedia. This topic ban is indefinite, to run concurrently with the SPI and AE blocks, and will continue in the event that Gilabrand is unblocked.HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?17:22, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Ali Osama (talk ·contribs) blocked for one week for violatingWP:3RR atYom Kippur War based on a report atWP:AN3. User also made disruptive, agenda-driven edits involving sources and lack of sources.--Bbb23 (talk)21:51, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Uishaki (talk ·contribs) is subject to azero-revert restriction on all articles already subject to the ARBPIA 1RR for one week, expiring at 08:41, 19 May 2014 (UTC), due to tendentious editing atFalafel andPalestine League. —Darkwind (talk)08:45, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Sean.hoyland (talk ·contribs) is blocked for 48 hours and is banned (updated: for three months) from commenting on arbitration enforcement requests by others relating to the Arab-Israeli conflict topic area, except where Sean.hoyland's own conduct is the subject of the request, perAE request. Sandstein 11:13, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Toatec (talk ·contribs) is subject to an indefinitetopic ban from all pages related to the Arab-Israeli conflict (includingQumran and all pages related to it) due to persistentediting warring which demonstrates that this is asingle purpose account.Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)08:39, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Toatec blocked 1 week for breaches of topic ban.Fut.Perf.☼14:12, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Toatec blocked 1 month for breaching topic ban (1 and2).Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)05:35, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• AmirSurfLera (talk ·contribs) andKipa Aduma, Esq. (talk ·contribs) are banned indefinitely from articles, discussions, and any other content related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed; they may appeal this after six months.Sean.hoyland (talk ·contribs) is warned not to accuse others of being a sock without providing sufficient reasoning. This is done pursuant tothis arbitration enforcement request.Lord Roem ~ (talk)06:29, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • AmirSurfLera (talk ·contribs) appealed his topic ban to AE;the appeal was declined.HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?21:43, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Wikieditorpro (talk ·contribs) is indefinitely topic banned from all pages and making any edit broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. It is suggested that Wikieditorpro does not appeal for at least six months.Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)09:00, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Sepsis II (talk ·contribs) banned from the topic of the Arab-Israeli conflict for the duration of six months, perAE request. Sandstein 13:43, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Plot Spoiler (talk ·contribs) andOncenawhile (talk ·contribs) are warned for their editing at1950–1951 Baghdad bombings. Any further unilateral reverts may lead to a topic ban from ARBPIA. Perthis AE closure.EdJohnston (talk)15:21, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Ezzex (talk ·contribs)topic-banned from the Arab-Israeli conflict for three-months.Lord Roem ~ (talk)06:23, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Heba25 (talk ·contribs) blocked indefinitely as a vandalism-only account for editing atDead Sea.Daniel Case (talk)01:03, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Uishaki (talk ·contribs) is indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed. They may appeal this sanction in six months. Done for the reasons provided in response tothis arbitration enforcement request.Lord Roem ~ (talk)18:30, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Sean.hoyland (talk ·contribs) is banned from the Arab-Israeli conflict topic area for three months, perAE request. Sandstein 06:53, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Monochrome monitor (talk ·contribs)warned against confrontative conduct perAE request. Sandstein 07:13, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Johorean Boy (talk ·contribs) blocked for 1 week for persistent edit-warring at2014 Israel–Gaza conflict.Huon (talk)22:56, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Wickey-nl (talk ·contribs) is banned from the topic of the Arab-Israeli conflict, perAE request. Sandstein 16:31, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Blocked for three months for repeated violations (in fact, since their ban, they've done literally nothing else on-wiki).GoldenRing (talk)16:13, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Galatz (talk ·contribs) blocked for 48 hours. Edit warringTimeline of the 2014 Israel–Gaza conflictSpinningSpark 18:04, 26 August 2014‎
• 84.108.204.8 (talk ·contribs) blocked for 48 hours. Edit warringTimeline of the 2014 Israel–Gaza conflictSpinningSpark 18:04, 26 August 2014‎
• WarKosign (talk ·contribs) is warned perthis message, as theresult of a 1RR complaint at AE.EdJohnston (talk)15:45, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• SeattliteTungsten (talk ·contribs)cautioned for needlessly antagonising another editor onTalk:Israeli West Bank barrier and elsewhere (cf.ANI thread).HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?17:04, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• SeattliteTungsten (talk ·contribs) is blocked for 48 h for violating 1RR perAE request. Sandstein 09:17, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Indefinitely topic-banned persubsequent request owing to aggressive sockpuppetry. Sandstein 08:18, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Uishaki (talk ·contribs) is blocked for one week for breach of topic ban.Dougweller (talk)18:07, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Template:Largest Israeli cities (edit |talk |history |links |watch |logs) semi protected indefinitely due to persistentdisruptive editing and addition ofunsourced and poorly sourced content by IPs.Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)03:38, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Wlglunight93 (talk ·contribs) blocked for a month for a fourth violation of the 1RR in quick succession (AE report).HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?14:21, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Topic-banned from the area of conflict following block-evading sockpuppetry documented atWikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wlglunight93. Sandstein 22:55, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Block extended to three months for continued block evasion.HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?16:01, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Block extended to one year (as an AE block) concurrent with an indefinite block (as an ordinary admin action) for repeated block evasion and further disruption via sockpuppets (cf.Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wlglunight93).HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?23:52, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• MarciulionisHOF (talk ·contribs) topic-banned indefinitely with provision for review after six months (seeAE thread).HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?17:11, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Dr. R.R. Pickles (talk ·contribs) blocked 48 hours for a personal attack and battleground mentality andstrongly advised that a continuation will result in stronger sanctions.HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?16:24, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Block extended to one week and talk page access revoked due to continued personal attacks.HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?16:51, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Plot Spoiler (talk ·contribs)strongly cautioned and counselled regarding the 1RR and expected standards of decorum after a 1RR violation; advised that tangible sanctions are likely should they come to notice for 1RR violations again (seeAE thread).HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?18:18, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Uishaki (talk ·contribs) blocked 48 hours for editingPalestinian refugee contrary to his topic ban fromWP:ARBPIA.EdJohnston (talk)16:18, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Asilah1981 (talk ·contribs) blocked72 hours for battleground editing and aggressive edit summaries at1948 Palestinian exodus, as well as a personal attack. See a previous AE complaint which closed 30 November.EdJohnston (talk)17:08, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Uishaki (talk ·contribs) blocked for a fortnight for another topic ban violation (seerelated AE thread).HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?14:01, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Block extended by one month byJamesBWatson for block evasion.HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?16:56, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Yossiea (talk ·contribs)blocked for 24 hours for breaching 1RR onList of military occupations perAE request.Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)08:25, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Yambaram (talk ·contribs)blocked for 24 hours for breaching 1RR onPalestinian political violence.Heimstern Läufer(talk)12:17, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Danielcohn (talk ·contribs) blocked for 48 hours for violatingWP:1RR atCity of David per report atWP:AN3.--Bbb23 (talk)11:13, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Here come the Suns (talk ·contribs) blocked for 48 hours for violatingWP:1RR atState of Palestine, reported atWP:AN3.--Bbb23 (talk)23:16, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Jalapenos do exist (talk ·contribs) blocked for 31 hours for violatingWP:1RR at2014 kidnapping of Israeli teens, reported atWP:AN3.--Bbb23 (talk)16:17, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• AmirSurfLera (talk ·contribs) blocked for 48 hours for breaching 1RR on2013–14 Israeli–Palestinian peace talks, perthis AE request.Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)12:36, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• AmirSurfLera (talk ·contribs) blocked for one week for breaching the one revert restriction onBasic Laws of Israel, perthis AE request.Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)03:49, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Sepsis II (talk ·contribs) blocked for one week for violatingWP:1RR atWater supply and sanitation in the Palestinian territories per a report filed atWP:AN3.--Bbb23 (talk)23:26, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• AmirSurfLera (talk ·contribs) blocked for one month for violatingWP:1RR atMandatory Palestine per a report filed atWP:AN3.--Bbb23 (talk)14:34, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Monochrome monitor (talk ·contribs) blocked for 36 hours for violating 1RR onRachel Corrie perANEW report.Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)06:45, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Catherine Curran (talk ·contribs) blocked for 48 hours for violatingWP:1RR at2014 kidnapping and murder of Israeli teenagers.--Bbb23 (talk)05:16, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Lugnuthemvar (talk ·contribs) blocked for 72 hours for violatingWP:1RR at2006 Lebanon War per report atWP:AN3.--Bbb23 (talk)09:39, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• SeattliteTungsten (talk ·contribs) is blocked for 48 h for violating 1RR perAE request. Sandstein 09:17, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Wlglunight93 (talk ·contribs) blocked for 48 h perAE report. Sandstein 13:49, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Wlglunight93 (talk ·contribs) blocked for a week for a third 1RR violation in a fortnight (AE report). |16:54, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Plot Spoiler (talk ·contribs) blocked for 24 hours for a 1RR violation onQuds Day (AE report). |16:54, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Wlglunight93 (talk ·contribs) blocked for a month for a fourth violation of the 1RR in quick succession (AE report). |14:21, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Trahelliven (talk ·contribs) blocked 48 hours for two 1R violations onIsraeli Declaration of Independence (AE report). |02:27, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• My very best wishes (talk ·contribs) is banned from everything related to the writer and scientist Lev Lomize, as described inWP:TBAN, perAE thread. Sandstein 10:31, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Ban lifted pertalk page request. Sandstein 11:21, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Blippy (talk ·contribs) isTopic banned from all fringe and pseudoscience-related topics (includingBlacklight Power) on all pages of Wikipedia for a period of 6 months perthis AE request.Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)08:51, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Wavyinfinity (talk ·contribs) is topic-banned from everything related to astrophysics or cosmology, perAE thread. Sandstein 13:57, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Blocked for 1 month fortopic ban violation. Sandstein 08:16, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Blocked for a further 3 months for further violations after initial block expired.Dragons flight (talk)04:26, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Askahrc (talk ·contribs) is strongly admonished for using an IP address to harass other users and waste the community's time (see theSPI). Askahrc is warned that any attempt to harass other users, waste the community's time or edit logged out or with another account in contravention ofWP:SOCK will result in an extended block. Askahrc is also restricted to using theAskahrc account only when editing pseudoscience or fringe science related topics and is banned from notifying any user of pseudoscience or fringe science discretionary sanctions. Seethe warning for further information.Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)03:02, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Tom Butler (talk ·contribs) is topic banned fromRupert Sheldrake perAE request.Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)06:57, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Barney the barney barney (talk ·contribs)warned for incivility andcasting aspersions in hisstatement in an AE request, seemy edit to AE regarding Barney's statement.Callanecc (talk •contribs •logs)23:04, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Cjwilky (talk ·contribs) banned indefinitely from the topic ofHomeopathy.[21] Rationale described in message.NW(Talk)14:02, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Synsepalum2013 (talk ·contribs) Is topic banned from all editing on fringe science and pseudo-science, broadly construed, including "Voice to skull", "electronic harassment", and similar topics. This ban applies to all editing, on any page, whether article, talk page, or any other page.The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk)13:45, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Barney the barney barney (talk ·contribs) is banned from interacting withAskahrc (talk ·contribs), as described atWP:IBAN, for two months, perAE request. Sandstein 08:12, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Herbxue (talk ·contribs) is topic banned from all fringe science and pseudo-science topics (includingAcupuncture &Traditional Chinese Medicine), broadly construed, for a period of six months. This is pursuant tothis AE request.Lord Roem ~ (talk)01:50, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Ayurveda (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views)

• All editors ofAyurveda are restricted from edit-warring, broadly construed; from name-calling, however mild; and from making major changes without agreement in talk. This restriction is until further notice. --John (talk)17:22, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Dornicke (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log) indefinitely topic-banned from all 9/11-related edits, per AE discussion here[22].Fut.Perf.☼09:43, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• KoshVorlon (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log) indefinitelytopic banned from "all pages and discussions related to transgender issues, broadly construed" after returning from previous topic ban and almost immediately resuming disruptive behavior on trans-related pages.A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk)14:19, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• It should be noted thatSportfan5000 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log) was ultimately blocked indefinitely as a sock of banned editorBenjiboi (talk ·contribs) -Aon^❤01:05, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Smatprt (talk ·contribs): Blocked for 3 months for socking asFatGuySeven (talk ·contribs) to avoid the Tban. byUser:Bishonenc10:02, 3 July 2014 (UTC). Socks blocked indef. 23:59, 2 July 2014 byUser:Bishonen (logged byRF 2014-11-24]])[reply]

• Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk ·contribs)is prohibited from making any reverts (WP:0RR) to theOperation Flavius article.Thryduulf (talk)12:37, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• 90.218.229.6 (talk ·contribs) blocked for 48 hours for violatingWP:1RR atUnited Ireland based on a report atWP:AN3.--Bbb23 (talk)00:46, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Neil Edgar (talk ·contribs) blocked indefinitely for sock-puppetry. CreatedPuckshed (talk ·contribs) to evade scrutiny (seeWikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Puckshed) and engage in a recurring pattern of harassment ofUser:HighKing andUser:Murry1975--10:51, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Mooretwin (talk ·contribs)appealed at AE to have his topic ban from the Troubles lifted, but the appeal was declined.EdJohnston (talk)05:56, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• As a result of an AE request[23]:

• Littleolive oil (talk ·contribs) istopic banned from the area of transcendental meditation, broadly construed, for six months. This restriction will expire at 00:00 UTC on 11 March 2014.
• IRWolfie- (talk ·contribs) is banned indefinitely from speculating or commenting in any way upon the real-life identity of any editor in connection with transcendental meditation, broadly construed, except that IRWolfie may contact the Arbitration Committee privately with concerns about such.Seraphimblade^{Talk to me}03:13, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Scope of Littleolive oil's topic ban clarified perthis AE request.Gatoclass (talk)06:09, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Pete K (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log) blocked for 1 month and 2605:E000:24C0:E400::/64 for 1 week perWikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pete K.King of ♠23:36, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Noindexed pages