Extensive investigation into vaccines andautism spectrum disorder[1] has shown that there is no relationship between the two,causal or otherwise,[1][2][3] and thatvaccine ingredients do not causeautism.[4] The American scientistPeter Hotez researched the growth of the false claim and concluded that its spread originated withAndrew Wakefield'sfraudulent 1998 paper, and that no prior paper supports a link.[5]
Despite thescientific consensus for the absence of a relationship[1][2] and the retracted paper, theanti-vaccination movement at large continues to promote theories linking the two.[6] A developing tactic appears to be the "promotion of irrelevant research [as] an active aggregation of several questionable or peripherally related research studies in an attempt to justify the science underlying a questionable claim."[7]
TheCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published updated statistics on autism in children for the year 2020. It states that in the year 2000, there were 1 in 150 children who were born in 1992 diagnosed with autism.[8] In 2020, they found 1 in 36 children born in 2012 were diagnosed with autism.[8] Anti-vaccination groups believe this to be due to the increased number of vaccines being given to children. Although there has been an increase in vaccines, there has also been an increase in autism screenings. It is clear from the literature and the CDC the increased number of children diagnosed with autism is due to the increase in ways to diagnose it.
Celebrity and social media involvement seem to play a role in the anti-vaccine movement.
The claimed mechanisms have changed over time, in response to evidence refuting each in turn.[11] Anti-vaccine groups claim that specific vaccine ingredients can cause autism. Some of the most frequently mentioned ones are thiomersal, aluminum adjuvants, and formaldehyde.
The idea of a link between theMMR vaccine and autism came to prominence after the publication of a paper byAndrew Wakefield and others inThe Lancet in 1998. This paper, which wasretracted in 2010 and whose publication led to Wakefield beingstruck off theUnited Kingdom medical register, has been described as "the most damaging medical hoax of the last 100 years".[12]
Wakefield's primary claim was that he had isolated evidence of vaccine-strain measles virus RNA in the intestines of autistic children, leading to a condition he termedautistic enterocolitis (a condition never recognised or adopted by the scientific community). This finding was later shown to be due to errors made by the laboratory where thepolymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests were performed.[citation needed]
In 2009,The Sunday Times reported that Wakefield had manipulated patient data and misreported results in his 1998 paper, thus falsifying a link with autism.[13] A 2011 article in theBritish Medical Journal describes the way in which Wakefield manipulated the data in his study in order to arrive at his predetermined conclusion.[14] An accompanying editorial in the same journal described Wakefield's work as an "elaboratefraud" which led to lower vaccination rates, putting hundreds of thousands of children at risk and diverting funding and other resources from research into the true cause of autism.[15]
On 12 February 2009, a special court convened in the United States to review claims under itsNational Vaccine Injury Compensation Program ruled that parents of autistic children are not entitled to compensation in their contention that certain vaccines caused their children to develop autism.[16]
TheCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),[17] the IOM of theUnited States National Academy of Sciences,[18] and theNational Health Service[19] have all concluded that there is no link between the MMR vaccine and autism. A systematic review by theCochrane Library concluded that there is no credible link between the MMR vaccine and autism, that the MMR vaccine has prevented diseases that still carry a heavy burden of death and complications, that the lack of confidence in the MMR vaccine has damaged public health, and that the design and reporting of safety outcomes in MMR vaccine studies are largely inadequate.[20] Further, an epidemiology study concluded that even children labeled high risk for autism, due to an older autistic sibling, that received the MMR vaccine resulted in no causal connection between the vaccine and autism or the increased risk of being diagnosed with autism.[21] The assumption that MMR vaccines cause autism is not isolated to the United States. A seven-year study was done in Denmark from 1991 to 1998 following children who received the MMR vaccine. The results of the study found that when comparing the vaccinated children to the unvaccinated children, the risk of autism in the vaccinated group was 0.92.[21] Also, the risk of another autism disorder was 0.83.[21] The study concluded there was no association between the MMR vaccine and autism.[21] The result held even when exploring the age of the child when the vaccine was given, the vaccination date, or the amount of time after the vaccine.[21]
Thiomersal is anantifungal preservative used in small amounts in some multi-dose vaccines (where the same vial is opened and used for multiple patients) to prevent contamination of the vaccine.[22] Thiomersal containsethylmercury, a mercury compound which is related to, but significantly less toxic than, theneurotoxic pollutantmethylmercury. Despite decades of safe use,[23] public campaigns prompted the CDC and theAmerican Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) to request vaccine makers to remove thiomersal from vaccines as quickly as possible on theprecautionary principle. Thiomersal is now absent from all common United States andEuropean Union vaccines, except for some preparations ofinfluenza vaccine.[24] (Trace amounts remain in some vaccines due to production processes, at an approximate maximum of 1 microgramme, around 15% of the average daily mercury intake in the US for adults and 2.5% of the daily level considered tolerable by theWorld Health Organization [WHO].)[25][26] The action engendered concern thiomersal could have been responsible for autism.[24]
The idea that thiomersal was a cause or trigger for autism is now considered disproven, as incidence rates for autism increased steadily even after thiomersal was removed from childhood vaccines.[11] The cause of autism and mercury poisoning being associated is improbable because the symptoms of mercury poisoning are not present and are inherently inconsistent with the behaviours or symptoms of autism.[27] There is no accepted scientific evidence that exposure to thiomersal is a factor in causing autism.[28] A study by the CDC exploring mercury poisoning in vaccines concluded no signs of poisoning were present.[27]
Under the U.S.Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Modernization Act (FDAMA) of 1997, the FDA conducted a comprehensive review of the use of thiomersal in childhood vaccines. Conducted in 1999, this review found no evidence of harm from the use of thiomersal as a vaccine preservative, other than local hypersensitivity reactions.[29] Despite this, starting in 2000, parents in the United States pursued legal compensation from a federal fund arguing that thiomersal caused autism in their children.[30] A 2004Institute of Medicine (IOM) committee favored rejecting any causal relationship between autism and vaccines containing thiomersal[18] and rulings from thevaccine court in three test claims in 2010 established the precedent that thiomersal is not considered a cause of autism.[31][32][33]
As mercury compounds in vaccines have been definitively ruled out as a cause of autism, some anti-vaccine activists proposealuminium adjuvants as the cause of autism.[34] Aluminium adjuvants simulate immune receptors and cause a strengthened response to the antigen in a way that is natural to the body.[35] Aluminium adjuvants can be used in the form of soluble salts, alumina, and hydroxide.[35] There is no substantial scientific evidence that aluminium adjuvants are linked to autism. When confirming that aluminium adjuvants are not dangerous in vaccines, it was concluded that there was no traces of aluminium in the children's hair or blood over the minimum level of risks according to theAgency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.[35]
Anti-vaccination activists commonly cite a number of papers which claim that there is in fact a link.[36] These are mainly published inpredatory open access journals,[37] wherepeer-review is virtually non-existent. Work conducted byChristopher Shaw,Christopher Exley and Lucija Tomljenovic has been funded by the anti-vaccinationDwoskin Family Foundation.[38] The work published by Shaw et al. has been discredited by theWorld Health Organization.[39]
A review study published in theopen access journalToxics suggests a link between early aluminium adjuvant exposure and autism; and concludes that there is a lack of fundamental scientific data demonstrating that aluminium adjuvants are safe.[40]
Formaldehyde is another assumed link between vaccines and autism. Even though the assumption still circles around, formaldehyde has been used safely in the diphtheria vaccines to detoxify the bacteria used to make the vaccine.[41] Another way it can be used is to inactivate the disease to be used in the vaccine.[41] Formaldehyde can be found naturally in the body and environment. The human body uses formaldehyde to build amino acids and to generate the energy we need.[41] Formaldehyde is all around us in daily life activities. It can be found in preservatives, materials used to build, and many products in homes.[41] There is no safety concern for formaldehyde in vaccines. The most concerning repercussion is cancer after exposure to high levels of formaldehyde in the air.[41] The amount of formaldehyde in some vaccines is less than what the body naturally produces.[41]
Following the belief that individual vaccines caused autism was the idea of vaccine overload, which claims that too many vaccines at once may overwhelm or weaken a child's immune system and lead to adverse effects.[42]The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Vaccine Education Center compiled a list of vaccines recommended to children throughout history. They found that from 1985-1994, the recommended number of vaccines totaled to eight.[43] The schedule for 2011 to 2020 revealed the recommended number of vaccines totaled to fourteen.[43] Vaccine overload became popular after theNational Vaccine Injury Compensation Program in the United States accepted the case of nine-year-oldHannah Poling. After showing signs of developmental delay as a toddler, Poling was diagnosed withencephalopathy caused by a mitochondrial enzyme deficit, which her family argued was triggered by multiple vaccines she received at nineteen months old.[11][44] There have been multiple cases reported similar to this one, which led to the belief that vaccine overload caused autism. However, scientific studies show that vaccines do not overwhelm the immune system.[11] In fact, conservative estimates predict that the immune system can respond to thousands of viruses simultaneously.[11] It is known that vaccines constitute only a tiny fraction of the pathogens already naturally encountered by a child in a typical year.[11] Common fevers and middle ear infections pose a much greater challenge to the immune system than vaccines do.[45] Other scientific findings support the idea that vaccinations, and even multiple concurrent vaccinations, do not weaken the immune system[11] or compromise overall immunity[46] and evidence that autism has any immune-mediatedpathophysiology has still not been found.[11]
Vaccines recommended from 1985-1994:[43]
Vaccines recommended from 2011-2020:[43]
Diphtheria, Tetanus, and Pertussis were given together as the DTaP.[43] Measles, Mumps, and Rubella were given together as MMR.[43]
Some celebrities have spoken out on their views that autism is related to vaccination, including:Jenny McCarthy,Kristin Cavallari,[47]Robert De Niro,[48]Jim Carrey,[49]Bill Maher,[50] andPete Evans.[51]
McCarthy, one of the most outspoken celebrities on the topic, has said her son Evan's autism diagnosis was a result of theMMR vaccine.[52] She authoredLouder than Words: A Mother's Journey in Healing Autism and co-authoredHealing and Preventing Autism.[53] She was also president ofGeneration Rescue, anon-profit organisation that claimed vaccines made children autistic and promoted various unproven treatments.[54][55][56][57] Generation Rescue ceased operations in December 2019.[58]
In a September 2015U.S. presidential debate,Republican Party candidate and futureUnited States PresidentDonald Trump stated he knew of a 2-year-old child who had recently received a combined vaccine, developed a fever, and subsequently autism.[59]
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. is one of the most notable proponents of the anti-vaccine movement. Kennedy published the bookThimerosal: Let the Science Speak: The Evidence Supporting the Immediate Removal of Mercury--A Known Neurotoxin--From Vaccines.[60] He is also chairman of the board ofChildren's Health Defense, a group and website widely known for its anti-vaccination stance.[61]
A study conducted through Facebook explored the results of anti-vaccine ads and pro-vaccine ads. The study found that even with a similar number of anti-vaccine ads and pro-vaccine ads, the middle point in the data set of ads per buyer was higher in anti-vaccine ads.[62] Another difference the study revealed was that the anti-vaccine ads were primarily targeted toward women and young adults who possibly had children.[61] The pro-vaccination ads were presented evenly to different ages.[61]
In December 2020, a poll of 1,115 U.S. adults found 12% of respondents believed there is evidence vaccinations cause autism; 51% believed there is no evidence; and 37% did not know.[63]
An updated survey, conducted in March 2023, concluded that adults think the MMR health benefits are high/very high, at 72%, and the risk of side effects is low/very low, at 64%.[64] There has also been a drop from 2019 in United States adults who believe students in schools should be fully vaccinated. The 2023 survey showed that a decrease to 70% of U.S. adults agree that children should be vaccinated for school but an increase to 28% believe that it is the parent's right to choose if the child is vaccinated for school.[64]
In March 2025, theU.S. Department of Health and Human Services, overseen by former chair ofChildren's Health Defense,Robert F. Kennedy Jr., hired vaccine criticDavid Geier to conduct a federal study on the long-debunked link;[65] Geier holds no medical credentials.[66]
{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)