HelloSara13kh, I saw you edits toKnowledge University, they were correctly reverted by Whpq. While you reverted him, I have reverted you also because it (the edit) goes againstour guideline for external links. I hope you understand that part.
The other part is that you're KU's employee, which means you must have aconflict of interest (this is particularly evident in you edits already). Our conflict-of-interest guideline (COI)strongly discourages editors who have COI to NOT edit their (in your case) employer's articles directly. They are, by all means, required to follow the steps we outlined here for them (see steps). For a start, and per our outlined steps, you should disclose your COI just the way we have outlined (see how).
I noticed that a couple of the sources you used are not accessible any more. Consider using a web archive site to archive any source you use so that it remains available even after the original source is gone.Help:Archiving a source provides more information. --Whpq (talk)19:49, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I just wanted to say thanks for reverting the recent attack on my talk page. I also feel like I should note that that particular user (User:ILOVEPRINCEGEORGE2001) may be a sockpuppet of User:ILOVEPRINCEGEORGE2000, who has been recently blocked. I'm nervous on how to respond to this elsewhere, and I've never dealt with this situation before, so I'm telling you here. —Alex26337(talk)07:30, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for letting me know.WP:SPI is where you can report sockpuppets. Considering the vandalism, you could also have reported this atWP:AIV and noted the sockpuppetry in the report. I have already blocked them so there is nothing more to do unless they decide to create another sockpuppet. --Whpq (talk)07:40, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, for the page about bebop (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bebop), I've been adding corrections and citations and am curious to know how much more work we'll need to do before we can remove the 'needs additional citations' banner at the top of that article. If you happen to know, I'd love to hear! Thanks lots. --Signorereepley (talk)16:58, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The citation tag is from May 2018. I don't see any specific issues that were discussed in the talk page. I suggest that you look through the article and tag any significant information that is unsourced with an inline{{cn}} tag that will point specifically to the item needing verification and remove the general tag after you have done that. --Whpq (talk)17:40, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and your gandfather's page is an encyclopedia article, not an obituary. It's not really appropriate to add your name there. I see you figured how to do it, and unsurprisingly, somebody has removed it. --Whpq (talk)03:06, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Whpq. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You canremove this notice at any time by removing the{{You've got mail}} or{{ygm}} template.
Yes, it appears to be vandalism, but ti has stopped. If you see vandalism, posting on the talk page of an admin isn't the best idea. I didn't see this message literally for hours.WP:AIV is a better spot to report ongoing vandalism. Cheers. --Whpq (talk)13:28, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! This is my first article. I've hit published and believe I've followed all instructions including referencing all sources. How long should it take roughly to get published and how will I know? Will I get a notification email? Thank you --CinephileChronicle (talk)02:42, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. I assume you are referring toUser:CinephileChronicle/sandbox. That article is in your sandbox, and will just stay there unless you take further action. As a new editor, you will need to submit your draft article for review using theArticles for creation process (AFC). I have added a submission box to the top of your article for when you are ready to submit the draft for review. I would strongly recommend against doing so right now as there are significant sourcing problems. Sourcing needs to be fromWP:reliable sources. The references you are using are primarily IMDB, and Medium. Both are sites with user generated content, and are generally not accepted as reliable sources. You will need to find other sources to use in order to establishnotability which is Wikispeak for meeting the criteria for a standalone article. You shoudl be looking for coverage in major newspapers or publications such as Variety, or the New York Times.
Thanks for your reply. There aren't any big publications such as Variety or NYT available but most of it is confirmed on the Spotlight webpage of the actor, which is managed by his agents and managers. Will that be sufficient? The Medium article is actually from the Authority Magazine so not user generated. Will a direct link to the original article be sufficient?
Material from agents, publicists and the like are not independent sources, and would not be usable for establishing notability. --Whpq (talk)20:40, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ok, any other suggestions except Variety and NYT? would linking to some of wikipedia articles that mention the credits work? Surely not everyone who's got a page has been interviewed by variety or NYT ;) people without that kind of press coverage are still professionals with credentials.CinephileChronicle (talk)22:02, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I would like to ask about the user Viewmont Viking, constantly removing my input in article "Edward Dwurnik" about his daughter claiming she is not a notable person. While I did substatntiate she is notable since she has article on Polish Wikipedia and her biography is mentioned in external suorces: I did substantiate Pola Dwurnik is a notanle person (meets all wikipedia crtieria). She has her own article at Polish Wikipedia.https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pola_Dwurnik.https://galeriabielska.pl/en/exhibition/pola-dwurnik-meet-the-artist, there is alos her New York gallery:https://www.harkawik.com/pola-dwurnik.
Well now the sentence is cut in the middle and makes no sense. I just care about the quality of this article. But I don't have any strength left to make special requests.Euphat (talk)19:24, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If you think there is an improvement, you can submit a request explaining what text should be removed and what text added in order to improve the article. --Whpq (talk)03:21, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm really confused. I don't see my article anywhere whether in the sandbox or elsewhere... Article about actor Eric Geynes.It took me ages to write and format it. I hope it didn't just disappear!Thank youRS --CinephileChronicle (talk)20:22, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The site receives more than 5 million monthly visits (ref fromSemrush).
DesignCrowd, the company that operates Design.com, has been active for 18 years and raised more than $A22m in capital (ref fromTechCrunch), and is one of Australia's more well-established and successful tech startups. (Edit: now over $A30m -ref)
I believe these are credible claims of significance or importance which make the article invalid for speedy deletion.
hey!i was wondering if I, as an individual can have a page on wikipedia..?i have noteable achievements and can share them with wikipedia team aswell. --Spandan Singh (talk)13:08, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey @Whpq. Your wiki edit anniversary was 1 day ago, marking 20 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey. :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee❚❙❚❙❙✉05:58, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Starting on November 4, the IP addresses of logged-out editors are no longer being publicly displayed. Instead, they will have atemporary account associated with their edits.
Administrators will now find thatSpecial:MergeHistory is now significantly more flexible about what it can merge. It can now merge sections taken from the middle of the history of the source (rather than only the start) and insert revisions anywhere in the history of the destination page (rather than only the start).T382958
AnArticles for Creation backlog drive is happening in December 2025, with over 1,000 drafts awaiting review from the past two months. In addition to AfC participants, all administrators and new page patrollers can help review using the Yet Another AFC Helper Script, which can be enabled in theGadgets settings.Sign up here to participate!
It is learned that Wikipedia admins made this difficult decision to delete the files which I uploaded at UTC time 03:46, and that my arguments to keep them were eventually not accepted, which I gracefully accept as a user. I also admit that since the article consists of mainly primary source, I will now redirect them back to theKluang town article itself to reflect the town's importance to readers both in and out of the town. I wish the admins well in upholding the values of Wikipedia and undertaking their responsibility.Hongqilim (talk)09:22, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. My name is Virginia but I go by Leanne. I would like to add an explanation to Wikipedia about what the circumstances were for the early Mormons taking multiple wives? Can you direct me to the section in Wikipedia where this subject is discussed? --Pumpkin0222 (talk)06:54, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Guideline and policy news
Technical news
Enable theuser info card
Arbitration
Miscellaneous
