on Wikipedia, thefree encyclopedia thatanyone can edit
This isTinucherian'stalk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
|
![]() | Beware! This user's talk page is patrolled bytalk page stalkers. |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than7 days may be automatically archived byLowercase sigmabot III. |
Hello, Tinucherian. Wewelcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or thingsyou have written about on the pageUST (company), you may have aconflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See theconflict of interest guideline andFAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you arerequired by theWikimedia Foundation'sterms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. SeeWikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted.I am aware you disclosed your connection a decade ago, but you should be more proactive about declaring your COI and avoid making edits to the article directly.Hemiauchenia (talk)17:47, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There are Arbitration motions relating to your editing under discussion atWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Motions#Arbitration motions regarding Tinucherian.ScottishFinnishRadish (talk)14:51, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The Arbitration Committee has resolved bytwo motions that:
1) For repeated and egregious breaches of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines onpaid-contribution disclosures andconflicts of interest,Tinucherian (talk ·contribs) is desysopped. Tinucherian may regain the administrative tools at any time via a successful request for adminship.
2d)Tinucherian (talk ·contribs) is admonished for repeatedly editing in a manner inconsistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines onpaid-contribution disclosures andconflicts of interest. The question of whether administrative action is needed for violation ofWP:COI andWP:UPE is left to normal community processes.
For the Arbitration Committee,HouseBlaster (talk • he/they)18:27, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
HelloTinucherian, please have a look atUser:Tinucherian/Sign and your Wikipedia signature preferences. If you substitute from there, please have a look atWP:SIG#NT and copy your signature code into the preferences field instead of relying on that page not having been vandalized. Thanks!~ ToBeFree (talk)16:16, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]