This user is aware of the designation of the following ascontentious topics: theArab–Israeli conflict living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles COVID-19, broadly construed Falun Gong climate change gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them post-1978 Iranian politics Theyshouldnot be givenalerts for those areas.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2

0:32 of this video.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o30UbjoOl6A

Sheesh, Wikipedia has really begun to suck.

35.143.146.10 (talk)13:18, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think you can usehttps://youtube.com/watch?v=a5MJ1lcygC4&t=32 for this, then, since they have permission to host the content. More infohere. Let me know if you need help turning that into a citation.Smallangryplanet (talk)13:23, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Estado Novo (Portugal) on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at01:31, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Editing naming as indicated in the citation at findagrave.com. According to his tomb stone at Arlington Cemetery his name wasMiguel Armando Rodriguez Vera, his father being of the last name Rodriguez, and his mother of the last name Vera. In Spanish culture the father's last name comes BEFORE the mother's last name and BOTH last names are officially used to distinguish individuals. Therefore, his name was Miguel Armando "Nando" Rodriguez-Vera. Please be sure to name him accordingly.

Here is the citation link:https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/126740596/miguel-armando-rodriguez_vera169.252.4.21 (talk)13:12, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is possible to add this photo of Obama with Miguel Armando Rodriguez Vera's nephew Joe Rodriguez to the page? Here's the link to that photo. Link:[1]https://picryl.com/media/president-barack-obama-presents-the-medal-of-honor-97386f Thank you.169.252.4.21 (talk)13:32, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you could use that but you would need to upload it to wikicommons - although it looks like we already have a couple of relevant images you could use -here's one from the same ceremony andhere's one from a separate ceremony at the pentagon.Smallangryplanet (talk)17:51, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The issue isn't the structure of his name, but that we generally don't allowFind A Grave as a source. Do you have any other sources for his full name?Smallangryplanet (talk)17:53, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Recently you reverted edits from 2409:40F0:4101:FBDE:8000:0:0:0 on the pageKadhalikka Neramillai (2025 film). They have since made more edits. I've tried to fix them up myself but would appreciate it if a more experienced editor such as yourself reviewed them as well and decided if they should just be reverted. Thanks,Sushidude21! (talk)11:37, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Sushidude21! - I think you made some good edits! Thanks for that. I added aRefimprove template and removed an unsourced box office comment. I'm mostly just patrolling recent changes so I have no subject area expertise, but at least superficially now the lead matches the body. Thanks again.Smallangryplanet (talk)12:31, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Sinfest on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at01:31, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just to avoid any misunderstanding, my claims came from the Israeli ambassadorhere, and I've added it as an expansion of the original statement. Thanks.60.240.26.249 (talk)10:05, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@60.240.26.249 Is there any sourcing that is not from the Israeli ambassador and the US govt?Smallangryplanet (talk)10:30, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The source is already included in the article. I'm happy to remove the VOA source if it's not reliable.--60.240.26.249 (talk)11:07, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why is what the Israeli ambassador says about antisemitism not relevant? Are you simply anti-Israeli?JerryJJJJJJ (talk)04:06, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@JerryJJJJJJ I don't remember what the context was here, sorry. My guess is there was an un-attributed claim from just this one ambassador. It wasn't about relevance. Regarding your second question, please don'tcast aspersions.Smallangryplanet (talk)07:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,this edit toPalestinian war crimes introduced severalno-target reference errors. To fix them you need to copy over the relevant sources from the article or articles you have excerpted the text from.DuncanHill (talk)11:32, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Argh! Sorry, I didn't have the no-target CSS enabled for some reason so I thought it was good to go. Thanks for flagging, will fix. @DuncanHillSmallangryplanet (talk)12:45, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed! Thanks again @DuncanHill!Smallangryplanet (talk)12:59, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you,DuncanHill (talk)13:00, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've just reverted to a previous state in the article because it was not clear to me that all of the editor's claims of failed verification were correct. In the process I've reverted a couple of your changes which I apologise for. If those changes are still required please re-instate them.TarnishedPath^talk15:17, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries @TarnishedPath, thanks for letting me know! Will have a look.Smallangryplanet (talk)08:57, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't like the idea of giving a templated barnstar or award or similar, but I did want to express my thanks for finding and improving sources forPotential American ownership of the Gaza Strip. And especially, for pinging me after you had done so giving me the opportunity to re-evaluate my !vote in the AfD discussion. It's a good example of how Wikipediashould work - collaboration and giving others the opportunity to change their mind to improve articles. If you prefer a pictoral award or barnstar of some kind, please accept whichever one you think fits best on my behalf. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez |me |talk to me!23:01, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Berchanhimez thank you for the kind words! Appreciate it and agree that this is how it should work. :) No barnstar/pictorial award necessary.Smallangryplanet (talk)12:06, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your input on the WWII comparison issue. Just wanted to share some thoughts for whatever they may be worth to you. If you don't reply, I shall not communicate with you again.

While I agree that the original "Surpassing" notion - first published in Foreign Affairs in June '24, has been repeated (verbatim) by other media, I am dubious that this should be viewed as "extensively covered," which suggests new reporting. Would also point out that your links to the comments of theUK Defense Minister, as well asa second link quoting the same comment, each make a point that specifically calls outcasualties as the key consequence of the WWII bombings.

In answer to your question on option 2, I would suggest that as editors we have a responsibility to predict the reader's understanding of what we've written. To me, it is inarguable that a very natural and unremarkable understanding of the comparisons we make on tonnage and destruction will be to assume therefore that casualties were similarly higher. Thanks again.Johnadams11 (talk)00:13, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, and thank you for your help making Wikipedia better! I wanted to let you know that a few of the articles you recently nominated forG5 speedy deletion were kept because they did not meet the stated criteria. In this case, articles were either created before the editor was blocked (and thus, weren't violating a block) or the article was significantly edited by at least one other editor. I hope that makes sense! Let me know if you have any follow-up questions. Take care,Significa liberdade(she/her) (talk)22:26, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Smallangryplanet Hello. Your recent filing of an AE request against me elevated my interest both in the subject of AEs and in your editing history. I've now observed a number of edits that in my opinion raise serious questions. I was dropping in to ask if you'd prefer to discuss them here before I build an AE.Johnadams11 (talk)12:51, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnadams11 I stand by my edits, you should do whatever you think is best.Smallangryplanet (talk)13:50, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is to inform you that there is currently a report involving you atWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of anArbitration Committee decision. The thread isSmallangryplanet.Johnadams11 (talk)21:09, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I havereverted your revert here. While theWP:ELBURDEN is clear, I would be interested in collaborating (or you just checking my work, when I actually get to it) on the ELs linking to EI?FortunateSons (talk)10:34, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a discussionhere,Huldra (talk)22:04, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Huldra for linking that discussion, I had lost track of it. @FortunateSons I've reverted your revert - the inclusion on the link has not been challenged since it was added except for by you. The discussion Huldra linked to makes it clear that this is decided on a case by case basis, rather than universally applied. Let's continue this over on the noticeboard page.Smallangryplanet (talk)09:01, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Works for me. I’m happy to let some other contribute to that discussion. Just for the sake of transparency, unless there is a significantly different outcome than there currently is, I’ll challenge every use that I don’t believe adds significant value underWP:ELBURDEN.FortunateSons (talk)09:02, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Smallangryplanet, Off topic, but I found it when checking if you had responded, so I might as well add it here: please be mindful of edits such asthis, the JCs reliability varies significantly by date.FortunateSons (talk)15:28, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. In this case it was within the unreliability window, hence removing it. (and the information was cited from other sources also)Smallangryplanet (talk)16:30, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but one of us is really reading this one wrong:In the 2024 RfC, there was consensus that The Jewish Chronicle is generally reliable for news until 2015. Additional considerations apply for Palestine/Israel topics between 2015 and 2020, with some concern that related topics may also require further considerations. Post-2020, The Jewish Chronicle is considered generally unreliable regarding Palestine/Israel topics, and requires caution regarding related topics. In the 2021 RfC, there was no consensus on whether The Jewish Chronicle is reliable for topics related to the British Left, Muslims, and Islam; there is otherwise a rough consensus it is biased in these topics. Where used, in-text attribution is recommended for its coverage of these topics. The removed reference is from 2009?FortunateSons (talk)16:36, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I readPost-2020, The Jewish Chronicle is considered generally unreliable regarding Palestine/Israel topics, and requires caution regarding related topics as "pre-2020, we didn't have an opinion, but now think it is unreliable w/r/t PIA" rather than "it is only unreliable about these topics post-2020". If the latter is the case then that's my bad, thanks for reverting.Smallangryplanet (talk)16:39, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That can happen, don’t worry.The close is “pretty complicated”, even according to the closer. And that one doesn’t even mention that the regular expert opinions published by the JC are evaluated separately, which is always a bit difficult.FortunateSons (talk)16:45, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are involved in a recently filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request atWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Amendment request: Johnadams11 Topic Ban and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, theWikipedia:Arbitration guide may be of use.

Thanks,Johnadams11 (talk)01:41, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected ofsockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts forprohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with theguide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence atWikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Smallangryplanet. Thank you.Chess (talk)(pleasemention me on reply)19:07, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		This is for your contributions related toGaza war.Pachu Kannan (talk)19:34, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Pachu Kannan, much appreciated!Smallangryplanet (talk)12:35, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are a subject of a motion being considered by theArbitration Committee. The motion is available atWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Motions#Motion: Smallangryplanet topic banned.

Your comments are welcome. If you need procedural assistance, you may contact thearbitration clerks eitherpublicly or privately via email toclerks-llists.wikimedia.org. For the Arbitration Committee,CaptainEek^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓05:08, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you sincerely for your contributions!! :)xRozuRozu •teacups21:35, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just found out about the ARBCOM case thingy and spent a good 30 mins trying to read the whole thing, and god, it is really stressful. I hope that this cookie with that 4-day-old tea makes you a bit happy or something (I am trying my best not to make this feel weird or sum)𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵)18:35, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Smallangryplanet. A proposed motion affecting you has beenarchived; the motion did not pass. For the Arbitration Committee,HouseBlaster (talk • he/they)19:56, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Henny Penny on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at21:30, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We became acquainted under rather unusual circumstances, but I wanted to extend my gratitude for your contributions to the case brought against us. I hope our paths cross under more favorable circumstances in the future.Lf8u2 (talk)23:51, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported byreliable sources.Reliable sources are required so that information can beverified. If you need help with referencing, please seeReferencing for beginners andCiting sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:Days of Fury and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk, on thereviewer's talk page or useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^Edits!Talk!14:01, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,Smallangryplanet!Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at theArticles for creation help desk. If you have anyother questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at theTeahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!Safari ScribeEdits!Talk!14:01, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Modest Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded toSmallangryplanet for copy edits totaling over 4,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during theGOCE May 2025 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions!Dhtwiki (talk)03:00, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Long Articles, 4th Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded toSmallangryplanet for copyediting 1 long article during theGOCE May 2025 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions!Dhtwiki (talk)03:00, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, welcome, welcome Smallangryplanet! I'm glad that you are joining theJune 2025 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Cielquiparle (talk)06:29, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Bella Hadid andTalk:Juno Dawson on "All RFCs" request for comments. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at13:37, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Birbhum district on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at19:30, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It will be held from Monday June 16 - Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help make the content produced as diverse and broad as possible! ♦Dr. Blofeld18:19, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atWikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at14:30, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atDraft talk:Seabrun “Candy” Hunter Jr. on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at15:31, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your ec onspecial:diff/1297130059, that's not a good reason to violate the wiki rules. All violations should be removed. I agree there are quite a few there.TaBaZzz (talk)09:52, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's violating the wiki rules. It's a timeline of events occurring during the "Gaza war", which is a multi-front war, despite the name. (Our article on the war itself –Gaza war – covers plenty of events happening in the West Bank and within Israel, not to mention Syria and Lebanon and etc.)Smallangryplanet (talk)10:06, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

such claims still need to be sourced, and can't violatewp:synth.TaBaZzz (talk)11:41, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, the item inquestion is sourced and is not synth (per source). I've added a better source needed tag (we probably could add one to the whole page, because there's a lot of dubious sourcing going on there), if that's your concern? @טבעת-זרםSmallangryplanet (talk)11:45, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Still the claim that it is related to the topic is unsourced. It's not about finding a /better/ source. Current source doesn't claim such relation. It's about providing such source at all, or otherwise violatingwp:onus.TaBaZzz (talk)14:04, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Smallangryplanet, for the second running of theDeveloping Countries WikiContest, it is nowopen for submissions. Welcome to the contest! You can now list your work atyour submissions page toearn points. The coordinators have addressed some of the queries at the last contest and we are hopeful that it'll turn out great for you—yes, you! If you haven't done so already, please review the following:

• New to Wikipedia? Many experienced editors are part of this contest and willing to help; feel free to ask questions on thetalk page.
• Got open nominations? List them at thereview requests sidebar.
• Looking for a topic to work on? Check outsuggested articles andeligible reviews. Remember, reviewsnow award 10 points!
• Not sure if your article qualifies? Seethe scoring rules for more information orcontact a coordinator.
• Know someone else who might be interested?Sign-ups remain open throughout the contest, so don't hesitate to invite other editors!

On behalf of the coordinators, we hope you enjoy participating and wish you the best of luck! If you have any questions, please leave a message on thecontest talk page or ask one of the coordinators:Arconning (talk ·contribs),sawyer777 (talk ·contribs), orTechnoSquirrel69 (talk ·contribs).(To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself fromthis list.) Sent viaMediaWiki message delivery (talk)—TechnoSquirrel69(sigh)03:52, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Paul Cameron on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(trialing replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (talk|botop)11:30, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Citation Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to Smallangryplanet for collecting more than 48.0 points during theWikiProject Unreferenced articles'sJUN25 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing over 9,500 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! –DreamRimmer Alt■15:53, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atWikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(trialing replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (talk|botop)17:30, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We're a month into the 2025Developing Countries WikiContest, with stiff competition at the top of the leaderboard already! Our current top five contestants are:

1. Spookyaki (submissions) – 256 points, mostly from a handful of GAs about women's history in Latin America as well as the1991 Haitian coup d'état.
2. vigilantcosmicpenguin (submissions) – 229 points, back with a number of articles on abortion in various African countries.
3. simongraham (submissions) – 213 points, mainly from GAs on species of jumping spiders in both Africa and Azerbaijan.
4. PizzaKing13 (submissions) – 200 points, with five GAs on articles relating to Salvadoran politics, history, andgriddle cakes.
5. BeanieFan11 (submissions) – 168 points from a few GAs, a few DYKs, and a few ITNs on athletes from a variety of countries.

Looking for ways to climb up the leaderboard yourself? Help out your fellow participants by answering a fewreview requests, particularly the older entries. Several more nominations needing attention are listed ateligible reviews, and highlighed entries receive a 1.5× multiplier!

On behalf of the coordinators, we'd like to thank all the participants for helping to combatsystemic bias on Wikipedia! If you have any questions, please leave a message on thecontest talk page or ask one of the coordinators:Arconning (talk ·contribs),sawyer777 (talk ·contribs), orTechnoSquirrel69 (talk ·contribs).(To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself fromthis list.) Sent viaMediaWiki message delivery (talk)—TechnoSquirrel69(sigh)03:36, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atWikipedia:Village pump (proposals),Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard andTalk:Star Trek: Section 31 on "All RFCs" request for comments. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(trialing replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)13:33, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Zak Smith on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(trialing replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)23:31, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atWikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(trialing replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)06:31, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedUnit 9900, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageFT.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)19:59, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

He’s no longer living. There are a plethora of confirmative sources across the web. The inaccurate data was clearly never confirmed with sources.— Precedingunsigned comment added byPeachykeen888 (talk •contribs)13:21, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Peachykeen888WP:BLP applies to the recently deceased as well. You need to cite the changes you made, including the name of his kid, which does not appear elsewhere in the article. I'll try to find a source, give me just a moment.Smallangryplanet (talk)13:27, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... I can't find any reputable sources for the exact date of his death or the name of his kid. Where are you finding thisplethora of confirmative sources across the web? @Peachykeen888Smallangryplanet (talk)13:30, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmmmm here’s one that took 10 seconds to find:https://m.teenidols4you.com/bio/Actors/2101/kacibrown.htmlPeachykeen888 (talk)13:36, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's not areliable source – I'm not saying the information's wrong, I'm just saying we need something more authoritative than a user-submitted-content fansite.Smallangryplanet (talk)13:40, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/hitched-hatched-hired-327892/#:~:text=American%20Idol%20songwriter/%20producer%20Beau,at%20Northside%20Hospital%20in%20Atlanta.2600:1700:7A00:34F0:7059:6668:5302:687A (talk)13:51, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide me with a reputable source stating he died March 8, 2025. I’d love to see it.Peachykeen888 (talk)13:38, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's proving tricky to find one that lists any specific date of death, unfortunately.Smallangryplanet (talk)13:41, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, so how is his page allowed to say he died March 8?????? But I cannot update it to the actual date he died???Peachykeen888 (talk)13:44, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good point! I've added citation needed tags to the relevant parts of the page, and a better source needed tag to the portion of the page about his death.Smallangryplanet (talk)13:49, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are like 100 songs listed in his discography that are not cited. You are on a power trip.Peachykeen888 (talk)13:43, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We don't always citediscographies, but details about a person's life (and especially about their children) should be cited.Smallangryplanet (talk)13:46, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/hitched-hatched-hired-327892/#:~:text=American%20Idol%20songwriter/%20producer%20Beau,at%20Northside%20Hospital%20in%20Atlanta.Peachykeen888 (talk)13:48, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Added!Smallangryplanet (talk)13:53, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I noticed you were recently editing the articlePizza Meter. Because the topic already exists atPentagon pizza theory, I have redirect the former to the latter. If you think these cover different topics, feel free to bring up atRedirects for Discussion. If you think Pentagon pizza theory is missing important information, feel free to add it. Let me know if you have any follow-up questions. Take care,Significa liberdade(she/her) (talk)14:34, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Hrvatska on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)11:31, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Smallangryplanet, regarding this RV of yours:special:diff/1311852133 please see the source of this info at footnote #30. Please also see that the lede sums the body and thatWP:CALC is notWP:OR.TaBaZzz (talk)12:13, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@טבעת-זרם I didn't see the footnote, apologies for that. I still think the edit was justifiably revertable forWP:OR because it is possible for people under 18 to be refugees. (Many are – as of ~2019 or sothere were over 1 million refugees in Gaza.)Smallangryplanet (talk)12:07, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Even that article doesn’t claim that the people of 1948 or 1967 are under 18. It’s all underWP:CALC.TaBaZzz (talk)09:02, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Right. Which is whyInhabited mostly by Palestinian refugees and their descendants is the correct phrasing, not only descendants.Smallangryplanet (talk)10:59, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:NCIS: Sydney on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)02:30, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I received your message; I would suggest that you bring your concern toArbitration enforcement. I think it's an edge case give the explanation that was already given.331dot (talk)12:54, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot Understood, thanks for your time!Smallangryplanet (talk)16:15, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Benjamin Netanyahu on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)09:30, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atWikipedia talk:Notability on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)17:30, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atWikipedia talk:WikiProject Skyscrapers/Tallest building lists on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)18:32, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atWikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)03:30, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Two weeks ago, the 2025Developing Countries WikiContest came to a close! After three months of stiff competition at the top of the leaderboard, we have our winners.vigilantcosmicpenguin (submissions), continuing his work on coveringabortion in Africa, comes in third with 692 points.simongraham (submissions) comes in second with 763 points, largely from a slew of good articles aboutjumping spiders. And returning to the podium for the second year in a row,BeanieFan11 (submissions) takes the Gold Belt Buckle with a mind-boggling 946 points from his series of articles on sportpersons. Congratulations to our winners!

Amazingly, the award for the most countries covered goes to bothBeanieFan11 (submissions) andsimongraham (submissions), who each submitted articles under 30 flags!BeanieFan11 (submissions) also wins for writing the most quality articles (16 good articles). For submitting 16 articles related to El Salvador,PizzaKing13 (submissions) wins the award for most submissions under one country. The award for most submissions related to women goes to bothSpookyaki (submissions) (7 biographies about women) andvigilantcosmicpenguin (submissions) (21 related articles). And for the second year,simongraham (submissions) wins for the most reviews, having submitted 21!

Among the participants' contributions were 2 FAs, 5 FLs, 124 GAs, and an uncounted number of DYKs, ITNs, and reviews of every kind! Regardless of your level of participation, every contestant can be proud to have contributed towards a major step in countering thesystemic bias on Wikipedia. Every year, millions of readers and editors around the globe use Wikipedia to educate themselves and communicate with others about parts of the world that often receive less attention than they deserve. Thank you for participating with us in the contest and contributing to this effort. The DCWC will return next year, and we look forward to seeing you contribute again! However, before that...

We need your feedback! Join the conversation onthe talk page to discuss your reflections on the contest (even if you didn't participate!) and help us make it better.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on thecontest talk page or ask one of the coordinators:Arconning (talk ·contribs),sawyer777 (talk ·contribs), orTechnoSquirrel69 (talk ·contribs).(To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself fromthis list.) Sent viaMediaWiki message delivery (talk)—TechnoSquirrel69(sigh)16:43, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atWikipedia talk:Deletion review on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)05:30, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Qatar on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)12:30, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Smallangryplanet. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Days of Fury, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)15:06, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Love your username other then the books having a slightly harmful rep ofDID/Plurality (identity) in Oren.

Still loved the book ;P -Flower (she/her;Accounts)02:47, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Copenhagen Consensus Center on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)22:30, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atWikipedia talk:Article titles on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)23:31, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Ahmed al-Sharaa on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)08:30, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Smallangryplanet. After reviewing your request, I haveenabledrollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

• Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installingTwinkle orUltraviolet. It just adds a[rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
• Rollback should be used to revertclear and unambiguous cases of vandalismonly.Never use rollback to revert good faith edits. For more information about when rollback is appropriate, seeWikipedia:Rollback § When to use rollback.
• Rollback should never be used toedit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the permission will be revoked.
• Use common sense. If you're not sure about something,ask!

I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, and feel free to leave me a message on mytalk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate use of rollback. If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. For information on rollback, seeWikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin) andWikipedia:Rollback. Good luck and thanks!Malinaccier (talk)13:36, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, I want to stress that rollback should only be used to revert obvious vandalism and should never be used to revert good-faith edits or in the controversial topics space. In your request for rollback, an editor expressed concerns that you would use the rollback tool in the contentious topics space. After looking through your edits, I am hopeful that you will use rollback properly, but I did want to leave this extra note to emphasize that rollback only be used to revert vandalism. Happy editing,Malinaccier (talk)13:39, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely, thank you @Malinaccier. I will very definitely only be using this power to revert obvious vandalism, just as I've been using Twinkle in my counter-vandal work so far. Best,Smallangryplanet (talk)15:29, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Smallangryplanet. Per your request, your account has beengrantedtemporary-account-viewer rights. You are now able to reveal the IP addresses of individuals usingtemporary accounts that are not visible to the general public. This is very sensitive information that isonly to be used to aid in anti-abuse workflows. Please take a moment to reviewWikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer for more information on this user right. It is important to remember:

• You must not share IP address data with someone who does not have the same access permissions unless disclosure is permissible as per guidelines listed atFoundation:Policy:Wikimedia Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy.
• Accessmust not be used for political control, to apply pressure on editors, or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. There must be a valid reason to investigate a temporary user. Note that using multiple temporary accounts is not forbidden, so long as they are not used in violation of policies (for example, block or ban evasion).

It is also important to note that the following actions are logged for others to see:

• When a user accepts the preference that enables or disables IP reveal for their account.
• Revealing an IP address of a temporary account.
• Listing the temporary accounts that are associated with one or moreIP addresses (using theCIDR notation format).

Remember, even if a user is violating policy, avoid revealing personal information if possible. Use temporary account usernames rather than disclosing IP addresses directly, or give information such as same network/not same network or similar. If you do not want the user right anymore then please ask me or another administrator and it will be removed for you. You may also voluntarily give up access at any time by visitingSpecial:Preferences. Happy editing!– robertsky (talk)18:36, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Robertsky! I will follow the guidelines and only use this for counter-vandalism purposes. Appreciate it.Smallangryplanet (talk)18:39, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:54, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedComparisons between Israel and Nazi Germany, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageThe Telegraph.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)19:52, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread isUsers Smallangryplanet and Raskolnikov.Rev: persistent disruptive editing. --Corriebertus (talk)22:53, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atCategory talk:Canadian sportspeople by country of descent on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)11:30, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Smallangryplanet — thank you again for taking the time to review my earlier submission. I’ve now fully rewritten the draft based on your feedback, using only independent, reliable sources from 1971–1976 (Enterprise Sun, Boston Globe, Boston Herald, and Nieuwsblad van het Noorden), plus the 1985 BWDA trade magazine profile.The new version focuses on Richard Allen himself — his background, his transition from physicist to inventor, and the independent coverage of him during that period — and removes the product-focused content you flagged. I also added direct quotations from the original articles to make clear that the sources are biographical, not promotional.Thank you again for the helpful guidance.BigAl32963 (talk)17:10, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand why you re-added the sentence in the lead "to have been". But what i don't understand is why you deleted the Cambridge assessment. It is clearly relevant to the article and it discusses very obviously Hamas's intent to commit genocide and previous remarks pointing at their antisemitic doctrine. See below some quotes from the article, you are welcome to re-read the article. If there is a specific sentence or word you find wrong in what i wrote it can be corrected. please re-add the sub-chapter you deleted: Cambridge University Ideological Assessments.

From article:

"In Hamas' case, the systematic nature of the attacks – their careful planning, coordinated execution across multiple locations and deliberate targeting of civilians – provides the first indication of such intent."...

"The specific genocidal intent can be inferred from a careful examination of Hamas' antisemitic worldview enshrined in its foundational Covenant, the systematic anti-Jewish policies that it has advanced over decades, statements of top officials both before and during October 7th , and the existence of a specific plan to destroy Israel and its Jewish population."...

"UN Watch and the Institute for Monitoring Peace and Cultural Tolerance in School Education (IMPACT-se) released a report detailing the incitement to hatred, antisemitism and terrorism rampant in the United Nations Relief and Works Agency in the Near East (UNRWA) school system in Gaza. Examples given in the report are conspiracy theories about Jewish world domination; praising Hitler;..... According to ICTY case law, genocidal intent can also be inferred from 'the general context, the perpetration of other culpable acts systematically directed against the same group, the scale of atrocities committed, the systematic targeting of victims on account of their membership in a particular group, or the repetition of destructive and discriminatory acts'....the events of October 7th speak for themselves of Hamas' intent to murder Jews"Rockwizfan (talk)09:37, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Adding the paragraphs directly from the report, without making it clear that that's what is happening, is dicey, I would check withWP:TEAHOUSE or similar because I'm actually not sure where we stand on reproducing creative-commons text. I'm also not sure what you mean by "the Cambridge assessment" because that paper is from the Israel Law Review - it ispublished by Cambridge but that does not make it a "Cambridge University Ideological Assessment."Smallangryplanet (talk)19:33, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I saw you declinedDraft:Kath French Secure Care Centre and said "You need to address the comments brought up by the previous reviewer before this could be accepted" - I think that may have been regarding the comment I left on the draft, but I had not reviewed it, only commented some advice. You were the first reviewer.-- NotCharizard^🗨14:39, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, my bad. I'll edit my comment.Smallangryplanet (talk)14:41, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've tried very hard on this draft not to use any words that would read like an advertisement, and to stick only to verifiable facts and figures. Should I just remove the sections: "Impact", "Fundraising", "LWB Programs" entirely? And any EIN Press releases? Thank you for any guidance you can provide!Akindofmagick (talk)01:46, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think that could help - possibly summarise the LWB programs portion as well. Generally speaking though you also will need to find external sources that cover LWB, rather than press releases etc. You might see if you can find relevant publications on theWP:RSP list discussing the org.Smallangryplanet (talk)12:22, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed 75% of the content, and all references except those from third party and the IRS. Does that suffice? Thanks in advance!Akindofmagick (talk)02:54, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Total Articles, 2nd Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded toSmallangryplanet for copyediting 25 articles during theGOCE November 2025 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions!Miniapolis20:38, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Total Words, 4th Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded toSmallangryplanet for copyediting 37,299 total words during theGOCE November 2025 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions!Miniapolis20:38, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Old Articles, 3rd Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded toSmallangryplanet for copyediting 12 old articles during theGOCE November 2025 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions!Miniapolis20:38, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The (modern) Guild of Copy Editors Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded toSmallangryplanet for copy edits totaling over 40,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during theGOCE November 2025 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions!Miniapolis20:38, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Miniapolis! Looking forward continued copy editing and of course, to the next drive. :)Smallangryplanet (talk)12:20, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm aware that many pro-Palestinian activists get smeared with the antisemitic label unjustly, but Ken O'Keefe is an antisemite. This becomes clear if you review his career for the last ten or fifteen years. He's either changed or has shown his true colors. That's why many pro-Palestinian voices like George Galloway, the Free Gaza Movement, and six different pro-Palestinian student groups have officially renounced his support.

As much as some of his earlier actions might have been admirable, he's now openly associating with far-right figures like David Duke, spreading a variety of conspiracy theories, and making inflammatory comments about Jews in general, not just Israelis or Zionists. You can see this for yourself on his Twitter page. He's probably gone insane.

Of course that's not something we can just add to an article. But everything I changed was properly sourced. For example, he was kicked out of the Marine Corps for the use of illegal steroids, not for "speaking truth to power" as he later claimed. He's been described as peddling antisemitic conspiracy theories by several reliable sources. It was the leader of the flotilla to Gaza that blamed him for starting the violence on the ship.

I mentioned this stuff on the talk page, please add to it.ItsRainingCatsAndDogsAndMen (talk)03:58, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ItsRainingCatsAndDogsAndMen My revert did not change the text about him being an antisemite. The David Duke stuff in particular (amongst all of it) is damningand accurately sourced to the SPLC, which also discusses the ways in which Palestinian groups have distanced themselves from him. I'll update this to reflect what's in that article. A vague reference tothe Pro-Palestinian crowd is not how this is described in that source. The Marine Corps line was not sourced to anything and the current phrasing is correctly attributed - if there is an accurate source about this, it would beWP:DUE to include it alongside the current attribution.Smallangryplanet (talk)13:28, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Tetris on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)20:31, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors December 2025 Newsletter Hello, and welcome to the December newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since September. If you'd like to be notified of upcoming drives and blitzes, and other GOCE activities, the best method is to add ourannouncements box to your watchlist. Election news: The Guild's coordinators play an important role in the WikiProject, making surenearly everything runs smoothly and on time. Editors experienced in drives or blitzes and in good standing (unblocked and without sanctions) are invited tonominate themselves or another editor (with their permission, of course) to be a Guild coordinator until 23:59 on 15 December (UTC). The voting phase begins at 00:01 on 16 December and runs until 23:59 on 31 December. Questions may be asked of candidates at any stage in the process. Elected coordinators will serve a six-month term from 1 January through 30 June 2026. September Drive: 43 of the 63 editors who signed up for theSeptember Backlog Elimination Drive edited 693,541 words in 265 articles. Barnstars awarded arehere. October Blitz: 14 of the 15 editors who signed up for theOctober Copy Editing Blitz edited 75,108 words in 31 articles. Barnstars awarded arehere. November Drive: 38 of the 65 editors who signed up for theNovember Backlog Elimination Drive edited 590,816 words in 240 articles. Barnstars awarded are postedhere. December Blitz: The December Blitz will begin at 00:00 on 14 December (UTC) and will end on 20 December at 23:59.Sign up here. Barnstars awarded will be postedhere. Progress report: As of 01:49, 8 December 2025 (UTC), GOCE copy editors have completed 293 requests since 1 January, and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 1,730 articles. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators,Dhtwiki,GoldRomean,Miniapolis andMox Eden. To stop receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name fromour mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)02:26, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you toreview other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located atSpecial:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located atSpecial:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
  

HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?19:13, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @HJ Mitchell!Smallangryplanet (talk)20:17, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also check outWP:TPCR.Destinyokhiria💬22:19, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh nice, thank you! Very helpful.Smallangryplanet (talk)22:24, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

You recently rejected my draft due to sourcing, as well as another reviewer, yet I used a book to source my draft. I used the bookDe Nederlandse stalen helm 1916 - 1992 ISBN: 978-90-90-31777-9 by Kevin de Joode. This is a specialized book made by a dutch work group to collect all information on Dutch 20th century helmets and is a wealth of information.

Is this not an adequate source?

https://www.oorlogsmuseum.nl/nl/webshop/de-nederlandse-stalen-helm-1916--1992/protoj (talk)21:20, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Protoj I agree with the other reviewer that this draft needs additional sourcing to show what we callWP:SIGCOV. You might ask around atWikipedia:WikiProject Military history to see if anyone has ideas for more places to get info on this helmet.Smallangryplanet (talk)21:23, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If the problem is the source than the book covers it greatly. The helmet was the standard combat helmet of the Netherlands from 1955 to 1992. Meanwhile the book covers 1916-1992. It is not a trivial mention of the M53 or a small book. In fact it is one of the best sources on 20th century Dutch helmets. It contains pictures of every manufacturer stamp to M53s found and repurposed outside the Netherlands.protoj (talk)21:41, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that there's no sourcing (on the page)other than the book. As that SIGCOV page says,Lack of multiple sources suggests that the topic may be more suitable for inclusion in an article on a broader topic. Is there another page that this information could be added to, if there's no additional sourcing on the helmet?Smallangryplanet (talk)21:45, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I am here for an response from you regarding theRendezvous with Rebels: Journey to Meet India's Most Wanted Men where you have tagged Refimprove. May I know for which claim/statement in the article I shall improve references?SaTnamZIN (talk)07:43, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I tagged it as Refimprove because the sourcing was to the book's author / publisher and didn't have a lot ofWP:SIGCOV, I saw the ANI case you filed just now and if other editors are cool with the sourcing as is I am very happy to retract my refimprove tag. Sorry for the delayed response - I am in the UK and am not able to edit Wikipedia 24/7, please remember thatwe're all volunteers here. :)Smallangryplanet (talk)14:53, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedJeff Shelton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageDwell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)07:55, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.SaTnamZIN (talk)08:15, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your blatant mischaracterization of the Amnesty International report. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ASexual_and_gender-based_violence_in_the_October_7_attacks&diff=1327058759&oldid=1327026337RedrickSchu (talk)13:28, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC